13 results on '"Alexis Pelletier-Bui"'
Search Results
2. Away Rotation Applications in Emergency Medicine: Medical Student Behaviors, Outcomes, and Stressors
- Author
-
Xiao C. Zhang, David Gordon, Lucienne Lutfy-Clayton, Doug Franzen, Joshua Wallenstein, Jamie Shandro, David Wilson, Michael Kiemeney, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, and Ronnie Ren
- Subjects
Students, Medical ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Emergency Medicine ,Humans ,Internship and Residency ,Osteopathic Medicine - Abstract
Completing an emergency medicine (EM) away rotation is integral to matching successfully into an EM residency program. The demand for EM away rotations (ARs) drives students to submit numerous applications without evidence-based recommendations to guide stakeholders on the approach or number to submit.We conducted a survey study of EM-bound fourth-year medical students to gain insight into their AR application experiences, outcomes, and perceptions.We distributed a 40-item questionnaire to EM applicants in Fall 2018 via e-mail through the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine, Council of Residency Directors in EM, and Emergency Medicine Residents' Association listservs. Responses were evaluated using quantitative and qualitative analysis. Primary outcomes were the number of AR applications submitted and AR offers received by students. Secondary outcomes were students' self-assessment of their competitiveness, differences in AR application numbers by degree type, sources of student advising, and student perceptions of the AR application process.There were 253 respondents, consisting of 192 allopathic (MD) and 61 osteopathic (DO) medical students, who met the inclusion criteria, representing about 10% of the applicant pool. On average, students submitted 13.97 applications (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.59-16.35), received 3.25 offers (95% CI 3.01-3.49), and accepted 2.22 offers (95% CI 2.08-2.36). DO candidates submitted twice as many applications as MD candidates while experiencing a similar rate of offers received. Peer influence (n = 154, 61%), peer online advising networks (n = 83, 33%), and self-assessment (n = 114, 45%) were the most often reported causes of increased applications; cost (n = 104, 41%) and geographic limitations (n = 114, 45%) were the most often reported causes of decreased applications. Open-response analysis revealed frustration with lack of standardization (n = 44, 29.5%), insufficient transparency on available positions (n = 37, 24.8%), limited communication (n = 30, 20.1%), and cost (n = 12, 8.1%).This study showed that, as a whole, students received one away rotation offer for every four to five applications submitted. It clarified factors contributing to increased EM away rotation application submissions and associated stressors inherent in the application experience. Our findings offer insights to inform advising recommendations. They also suggest that stakeholders consider standardizing the process and improve communication over spot availability and application status.
- Published
- 2021
3. The revised Approved Instructional Resources score: An improved quality evaluation tool for online educational resources
- Author
-
Nadim Lalani, Shelaina Anderson, Jonas Wilmer, Marina Roure, Kristen Weersink, Katherine A. Stuart, Brent Benavides, Wisarut Bunchit, Colleen Sweeney, Robert R. Ehrman, Richard Tang, Kelvin Tran, Gregory Wanner, Drew Kalnow, Christine Roh, Kinjal Patel, Bill Fraser, Therese Mead, Stephen Carroll, Paul Schofield, Caley Flynn, Lindy Buzikievich, Lucy Chen, Tara Stratton, Jan Hansel, Hector C. Singson, Tanner Gronowski, Ali Jamal, Adeeb Saleh, Todd Taylor, Rayan Delbani, Phil Griffith, Michael J. Ward, Miranda Wan, Ashley Kilp, Anna Whalen-Browne, Logan Mills, Ali S. Raja, Perry Menzies, Christine Patterson, Sandra Viggers, Brendan Devine, Vanessa Rogers, Braeden Beaumont, Jennifer Baird, Paula Sneath, Natasha Chatham-Zvelebil, Brandon Herb, Harry Liu, Marie Decock, Sarah Mott, Elise Lovell, Mohammad Ali Jamil, Ken Edwards, Victor Jansen, Maia Dorsett, Jaasmit Khurana, Salim R. Rezaie, Alexander Hart, Fareen Zaver, Manpreet Singh, Ching-Hsing Lee, Suzanne Rannazzisi, Mike McDonnell, Loice Swisher, Rob Carey, Joe Walter, Andrew D. D’Alessandro, Bob Stuntz, James Stempien, Preston Fedor, Kelly Lien, Parisa Shahrabadi, Shauna Regan, Alan Taylor, Nilantha Lenora, Scott Anderson, Calvin H. Yeh, Jason Trickovic, David Calcara, Werner Oberholzer, Catherine Patocka, James Fukakusa, T. Oyedokun, Ivy Liu, Regina Hammock, Steve Liu, Kevin Cullison, Chris Belcher, Teresa Dunphy, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Zander Laurie, Ashley Lubberdink, James Pearlman, James Huffman, Nikhil Tambe, Carolyn McQuarrie, Gerhard Tiwald, Gregor Prosen, David Lowe, Henry Swoboda, Jennifer Weekes, Kimberly Connors, Aaron Tyagi, Anali Maneshi, Patrick M. Lank, Emina Hajdinjak, Levi Johnston, Eric Chen, Abdulaziz S. Almehlisi, Zach Jarou, Noorin Walji, Alvin Chin, Tanis Quaife, Nikytha Antony, Lawrence Yau, Alexander Zozula, Gregory Costello, Louise Rang, John Mayo, Evan S. Schwarz, Victoria Brazil, P. Mukherj, Taylor Duda, Jaime Jordan, Susan McLellan, Alim Pardhan, Jared Baylis, Allan Mix, Cathy Grossman, Sean Dyer, Emily House, Eric Shappell, Colin Andrews, Mark Woodcroft, William D.T. Kent, Anthony Bryson, Nelson Wong, Pawan Gupta, Diptesh Aryal, Owen Scheirer, Morgan Oakland, Patrick Vallance, Brendan Moore, Mary R C Haas, Kenn Ghaffarian, Steve Montag, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Julianna Deutscher, Nina House, Keith Rosenberg, Sushant Chhabra, Viktor Gawlik, Michael Benham, Andrew Baker, Brent Thoma, Ernest Leber, Larissa Hattin, Casey Lyons, Timothy Chaplin, Kamini Premkumar, Shahbaz Syed, Ivanna Kruhlak, Stephanie Louka, Haakon Lenes, Rene Verbeek, SueLin Hilbert, Joshua Rudner, Julia Nood, Kelly van Diepen, Brian Whiteside, Karthryn T. Eastley, Julia Sheffield, Damjan Gaco, Sam Smith, Quinten S. Paterson, Teresa M. Chan, Jeremy Christensen, Jocelyn Andruko, Youness Elkhalidy, Cory Meeuwisse, Sheena Nandalal, Cara Weessies, Scott Knapp, Sheng Hsiang Ma, Meagan Fu, Veronica Coppersmith, William Denq, Vivian Jia, Kristina Lea, Hugh MacLeod, Simon Huang, Yingchun Lin, Wyatt Warawa, Will Sanderson, Brian Ficiur, Jessica G.Y. Luc, Taylor Nikel, Jessica Yee, Tina Choudhri, Patricia Van den Berg, Andrew Grock, Samantha Lam, Andrew Guy, Keeth Krishnan, Taku Taira, Eric Funk, Rachel Taylor, Ali Mulla, Sebastian Kohler, Kyle Kelson, Nicholas Bouchard, Stanislaw Haciski, Jesse Leontowicz, Paul Trinquero, Charlie Inboriboon, Justin Dueweke, Julian Botta, Emily Brumfield, Kat Butler, Patrick Meloy, Laleh Gharahbaghian, Andrew K. Hall, Maria Rosa Carrillo, Aubrey Powell, Louise Cassidy, Jesse May, Isabelle N. Colmers-Gray, Evelyn Tran, Sarah Batty, Vishal Puri, Randi Ramunno, Luis Vargas, Stephen Miazga, Justin Morgenstern, Michelle Lin, Andrew Griffith, Michael Susalla, Charlotte Alexander, Alex Ireland, Kerstin de Wit, Marcia L. Edmonds, Robert Sobehart, Rob Woods, Kirsty Challen, Dave Slessor, Abby Cosgrove, Eric Chochi, Onyeka Otugo, Amy F. Ho, Alexandra Gustafson, Zlata Vlodaver, Kerry Spearing, Ryan Raffel, Milan L Ridderikhof, Barbra Backus, Saeed Alqahtani, Paul Schunk, Anne Messman, Seth Kelly, Puneet Kapur, Andrew Little, Kathryn Chan, Sean Nugent, Rishi Khakhkhar, Mohammed Alkhalifah, Rachel Wang, Jesse Hill, Marc Phan, Jaroslaw Gucwa, Nick Mancuso, Paxton Ting, Matthew Wagner, Zafrina Poonja, Elisha Targonsky, Britni Sternard, Katherine Yurkiw, Manrique Umana, Jeff Hill, Matthew Willis, and Sherri L. Rudinsky
- Subjects
Medical education ,education.field_of_study ,Intraclass correlation ,business.industry ,Best practice ,Population ,MEDLINE ,Context (language use) ,Usability ,Original Contribution ,Emergency Nursing ,Education ,Emergency Medicine ,Thematic analysis ,education ,business ,Psychology ,Quality assurance - Abstract
Background Free Open-Access Medical education (FOAM) use among residents continues to rise. However, it often lacks quality assurance processes and residents receive little guidance on quality assessment. The Academic Life in Emergency Medicine Approved Instructional Resources tool (AAT) was created for FOAM appraisal by and for expert educators and has demonstrated validity in this context. It has yet to be evaluated in other populations. Objectives We assessed the AAT's usability in a diverse population of practicing emergency medicine (EM) physicians, residents, and medical students; solicited feedback; and developed a revised tool. Methods As part of the Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality (METRIQ) study, we recruited medical students, EM residents, and EM attendings to evaluate five FOAM posts with the AAT and provide quantitative and qualitative feedback via an online survey. Two independent analysts performed a qualitative thematic analysis with discrepancies resolved through discussion and negotiated consensus. This analysis informed development of an initial revised AAT, which was then further refined after pilot testing among the author group. The final tool was reassessed for reliability. Results Of 330 recruited international participants, 309 completed all ratings. The Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) score was the component most frequently reported as difficult to use. Several themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: for ease of use-understandable, logically structured, concise, and aligned with educational value. Limitations include deviation from questionnaire best practices, validity concerns, and challenges assessing evidence-based medicine. Themes supporting its use include evaluative utility and usability. The author group pilot tested the initial revised AAT, revealing a total score average measure intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of moderate reliability (ICC = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0 to 0.962). The final AAT's average measure ICC was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.77 to 0.95). Conclusions We developed the final revised AAT from usability feedback. The new score has significantly increased usability, but will need to be reassessed for reliability in a broad population.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. More Is More: Drivers of the Increase in Emergency Medicine Residency Applications
- Author
-
Laura R. Hopson, Zachary J. Jarou, Robert Huang, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Jim Cranford, Douglas Franzen, Lucienne Lutfy-Clayton, and David Gordon
- Subjects
Service (business) ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Descriptive statistics ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,MEDLINE ,lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,Internship and Residency ,lcsh:Medicine ,Educational Commentary ,General Medicine ,Certification ,lcsh:RC86-88.9 ,Peer Group ,United States ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Emergency medicine ,medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Humans ,Female ,business ,Original Research - Abstract
Introduction The average number of applications per allopathic applicant to emergency medicine (EM) residency programs in the United States (US) has increased significantly since 2014. This increase in applications has caused a significant burden on both programs and applicants. Our goal in this study was to investigate the drivers of this application increase so as to inform strategies to mitigate the surge. Methods An expert panel designed an anonymous, web-based survey, which was distributed to US allopathic senior applicants in the 2017-2018 EM match cycle via the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine and the Emergency Medicine Residents Association listservs for completion between the rank list certification deadline and release of match results. The survey collected descriptive statistics and factors affecting application decisions. Results A total of 532 of 1748 (30.4%) US allopathic seniors responded to the survey. Of these respondents, 47.3% felt they had applied to too many programs, 11.8% felt they had applied to too few, and 57.7% felt that their perception of their own competitiveness increased their number of applications. Application behavior of peers going into EM was identified as the largest external factor driving an increase in applications (61.1%), followed by US Medical Licensing Exam scores (46.9%) - the latter was most pronounced in applicants who self-perceived as "less competitive." The most significant limiter of application numbers was the cost of using the Electronic Residency Application Service (34.3%). Conclusion A substantial group of EM applicants identified that they were over-applying to residencies. The largest driver of this process was individual applicant response to the behavior of their peers who were also going into EM. Understanding these motivations may help inform solutions to overapplication.
- Published
- 2020
5. COVID-19: A Driver for Disruptive Innovation of the Emergency Medicine Residency Application Process
- Author
-
Thomas K. Morrissey, Lucienne Lutfy-Clayton, Mary Ann Edens, Liza Smith, Kendra Parekh, Erin McDonough, David Gordon, Benjamin H. Schnapp, Doug Franzen, Michael Kiemeney, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Mark Olaf, and Laura R. Hopson
- Subjects
Educational Advances ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Process (engineering) ,Pneumonia, Viral ,Process improvement ,MEDLINE ,lcsh:Medicine ,Patient care ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,Betacoronavirus ,0302 clinical medicine ,Leverage (negotiation) ,medicine ,Disruptive innovation ,Humans ,School Admission Criteria ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Pandemics ,business.industry ,SARS-CoV-2 ,lcsh:R ,Equity (finance) ,lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,COVID-19 ,Internship and Residency ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,General Medicine ,lcsh:RC86-88.9 ,Organizational Innovation ,United States ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Videoconferencing ,business ,Coronavirus Infections - Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on undergraduate medical education with limitation of patient care activities and disruption to medical licensing examinations. In an effort to promote both safety and equity, the emergency medicine (EM) community has recommended no away rotations for EM applicants and entirely virtual interviews during this year's residency application cycle. These changes affect the components of the EM residency application most highly regarded by program directors - Standardized Letters of Evaluation from EM rotations, board scores, and interactions during the interview. The Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine Application Process Improvement Committee suggests solutions not only for the upcoming year but also to address longstanding difficulties within the process, encouraging residency programs to leverage these challenges as an opportunity for disruptive innovation.
- Published
- 2020
6. Addressing Challenges in Obtaining Emergency Medicine Away Rotations and Standardized Letters of Evaluation Due to COVID-19 Pandemic
- Author
-
Xiao Chi Zhang, Linda Katirji, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Mark Olaf, Michael Pasirstein, Ronnie Ren, Jazmyn Shaw, Liza Smith, Emily Hillman, and Douglas Franzen
- Subjects
Educational Advances ,medicine.medical_specialty ,2019-20 coronavirus outbreak ,Students, Medical ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,Pneumonia, Viral ,MEDLINE ,lcsh:Medicine ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,Betacoronavirus ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pandemic ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Pandemics ,Students medical ,Schools, Medical ,Travel ,business.industry ,SARS-CoV-2 ,lcsh:R ,lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,COVID-19 ,Internship and Residency ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,lcsh:RC86-88.9 ,General Medicine ,Organizational Policy ,United States ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Clinical Competence ,business ,Coronavirus Infections - Abstract
The Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD) Advising Students Committee in Emergency Medicine (ASC-EM) anticipates institutional and regional variability in both the spread and response to COVID-19. Travel restrictions and host institution rotation closures will impact the number of emergency medicine (EM) rotations EM-bound medical students can complete in an unprecedented manner. They may prevent students from completing any away rotations this academic cycle, challenging the students’ ability to obtain EM Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOEs). EM’s emphasis on residency group SLOEs over other letter types creates an undue burden on these vulnerable students and makes the application process intrinsically inequitable. This inequity warrants a reevaluation of the current application practice. This article outlines ASC-EM's proposed recommendations for all stakeholders, including EM program leadership, medical schools, and EM-bound medical students, to consider for the upcoming EM application cycle.
- Published
- 2020
7. Advising special population emergency medicine residency applicants: a survey of emergency medicine advisors and residency program leadership
- Author
-
Christopher W. Jones, Liza Smith, Caitlin Schrepel, Adam R. Kellogg, Xiao Chi Zhang, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Mary Ann Edens, and Emily Hillman
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Special populations ,lcsh:Medicine ,IMG ,Applying for residency ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Population Groups ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Emergency medicine match ,Multiple choice ,Medical education ,lcsh:LC8-6691 ,lcsh:Special aspects of education ,lcsh:R ,Internship and Residency ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,General Medicine ,computer.file_format ,Residency program ,United States ,Leadership ,Medical graduate ,Scale (social sciences) ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Psychology ,computer ,Medical student advising ,Research Article - Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to determine the advising and emergency medicine (EM) residency selection practices for special population applicant groups for whom traditional advice may not apply. Methods A survey was distributed on the Council of Residency Directors in EM and Clerkship Directors in EM Academy listservs. Multiple choice, Likert-type scale, and fill-in-the-blank questions addressed the average EM applicant and special population groups (osteopathic; international medical graduate (IMG); couples; at-risk; re-applicant; dual-accreditation applicant; and military). Percentages and 95% confidence intervals [CI] were calculated. Results One hundred four surveys were completed. Of respondents involved in the interview process, 2 or more standardized letters of evaluation (SLOEs) were recommended for osteopathic (90.1% [95% CI 84–96]), IMG (82.5% [73–92]), dual-accreditation (46% [19–73]), and average applicants (48.5% [39–58]). Recommendations for numbers of residency applications to submit were 21–30 (50.5% [40.7–60.3]) for the average applicant, 31–40 (41.6% [31.3–51.8]) for osteopathic, and > 50 (50.9% [37.5–64.4]) for IMG. For below-average Step 1 performance, 56.0% [46.3–65.7] were more likely to interview with an average Step 2 score. 88.1% [81.8–94.4] will consider matching an EM-EM couple. The majority were more likely to interview a military applicant with similar competitiveness to a traditional applicant. Respondents felt the best option for re-applicants was to pursue the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP) for a preliminary residency position. Conclusion Advising and residency selection practices for special population applicants differ from those of traditional EM applicants. These data serve as an important foundation for advising these distinct applicant groups in ways that were previously only speculative. While respondents agree on many advising recommendations, outliers exist.
- Published
- 2020
8. An Elderly Man in Septic Shock
- Author
-
Rebecca Fieles, Joshua S. Rempell, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Angela Ugorets, and Charles Ingram
- Subjects
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ,Male ,Rupture ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Septic shock ,MEDLINE ,medicine.disease ,Shock, Septic ,Anti-Bacterial Agents ,Diagnosis, Differential ,Cholecystitis ,Emergency Medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Intensive care medicine ,business ,Aged - Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Relationship Between Institutional Standardized Letter of Evaluation Global Assessment Ranking Practices, Interviewing Practices, and Medical Student Outcomes
- Author
-
Michael Pasirstein, Diane Rimple, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Michael Van Meter, and Christopher W. Jones
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Medical education ,Interview ,Brief Contributions ,education ,030106 microbiology ,Graduate medical education ,Emergency Nursing ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,Ranking ,Emergency Medicine ,Psychology - Abstract
Background Emergency medicine (EM) program directors rely largely on the standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) to help determine which applicants to interview in the face of an increasing number of applications. To further characterize the SLOE's role in the EM application process, particularly the global assessment (GA) ranking and its effect on interviewing practices and medical student outcomes, the leaders of EM programs were surveyed regarding their experiences in both generating and utilizing the SLOE. Methods Individuals on the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) and Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) Academy listservs were anonymously surveyed from March 21-30, 2015, with 18 questions in multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank formats. Results There were 99 respondents. Only 39 respondents (39%) reported adhering strictly to SLOE guidelines by evenly placing their students into thirds (top, middle, lower) on the SLOE GA. Most respondents interviewed individuals ranked in the lower third. Programs adhering strictly to ranking guidelines were more likely to interview students in the lower third than those adhering loosely or not at all. There was no relationship between a program's self-reported adherence to the SLOE ranking guidelines and the number of unmatched students in EM during the 2014 and 2015 academic years. Conclusion Many SLOE writers do not strictly adhere to CORD's SLOE writing guidelines when using the GA ranking, due to the fear of adversely impacting an applicant's ability to successfully match into EM. This calls into question the validity of the SLOE as it is currently used. However, this study suggests that adhering to recommended SLOE ranking guidelines is unlikely to substantially increase the risk that students will fail to match. If more evaluators were to adhere to the guidelines, the SLOE could become the valid evaluation instrument that graduate medical education has long been pursuing.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. The Social Media Index as an Indicator of Quality for Emergency Medicine Blogs: A METRIQ Study
- Author
-
Brent Thoma, Teresa M. Chan, Puneet Kapur, Derek Sifford, Marshall Siemens, Michael Paddock, Felix Ankel, Andy Grock, Michelle Lin, Charlotte Alexander, Mohammed Alkhalifah, Abdulaziz S. Almehlisi, Saeed Alqahtani, Scott Anderson, Shelaina Anderson, Colin Andrews, Jocelyn Andruko, Nikytha Antony, Diptesh Aryal, Barbra Backus, Jennifer Baird, Andrew Baker, Sarah Batty, Jared Baylis, Braeden Beaumont, Chris Belcher, Brent Benavides, Michael Benham, Julian Botta, Nicholas Bouchard, Victoria Brazil, Emily Brumfield, Anthony Bryson, Wisarut Bunchit, Kat Butler, Lindy Buzikievich, David Calcara, Rob Carey, Stephen Carroll, Louise Cassidy, Kirsty Challen, Kathryn Chan, Tim Chaplin, Natasha Chatham-Zvelebil, Eric Chen, Lucy Chen, Sushant Chhabra, Alvin Chin, Eric Chochi, Tina Choudhri, Jeremy Christensen, Isabelle Colmers-Gray, Kimberly Connors, Veronica Coppersmith, Abby Cosgrove, Gregory Costello, Kevin Cullison, Andrew D'Alessandro, Kerstin de Wit, Marie Decock, Rayan Delbani, William Denq, Julianna Deutscher, Brendan Devine, Maia Dorsett, Taylor Duda, Justin Dueweke, Teresa Dunphy, Sean Dyer, Karthryn T Eastley, Marcia Edmonds, Ken Edwards, Robert Ehrman, Youness Elkhalidy, Preston Fedor, Brian Ficiur, Caley Flynn, Bill Fraser, Meagan Fu, James Fukakusa, Eric Funk, Damjan Gaco, Viktor Gawlik, Kenn Ghaffarian, Laleh Gharahbaghian, Phil Griffith, Andrew Griffith, Andrew Grock, Tanner Gronowski, Cathy Grossman, Jaroslaw Gucwa, Pawan Gupta, Alexandra Gustafson, Andrew Guy, Mary Haas, Stanislaw Haciski, Emina Hajdinjak, Andrew K. Hall, Regina Hammock, Jan Hansel, Alexander Hart, Larissa Hattin, Brandon Herb, SueLin Hilbert, Jesse Hill, Jeff Hill, Amy Ho, Emily House, Nina House, James Huffman, Charlie Inboriboon, Alex Ireland, Ali Jamal, Mohammad Ali Jamil, Victor Jansen, Zach Jarou, Vivian Jia, Levi Johnston, Drew Kalnow, Seth Kelly, Kyle Kelson, William Kent, Rishi Khakhkhar, Jaasmit Khurana, Ashley Kilp, Scott Knapp, Sebastian Kohler, Ivanna Kruhlak, Nadim Lalani, Samantha Lam, Patrick Lank, Zander Laurie, Kristina Lea, Ernest Leber, Ching-Hsing Lee, Haakon Lenes, Nilantha Lenora, Jesse Leontowicz, Kelly Lien, Yingchun Lin, Andrew Little, Ivy Liu, Harry Liu, Steve Liu, Stephanie Louka, Elise Lovell, David Lowe, Ashley Lubberdink, Jessica Luc, Casey Lyons, Sheng-Hsiang Ma, Hugh MacLeod, Nick Mancuso, Anali Maneshi, Jesse May, John Mayo, Mike McDonnell, Susan McLellan, Carolyn McQuarrie, Julia Nood, Therese Mead, Cory Meeuwisse, Patrick Meloy, Perry Menzies, Anne Messman, Stephen Miazga, Logan Mills, Ken Milne, Allan Mix, Steve Montag, Brendan Moore, Justin Morgenstern, Sarah Mott, P. Mukherj, Ali Mulla, Sheena Nandalal, Taylor Nikel, Sean Nugent, Morgan Oakland, Werner Oberholzer, Onyeka Otugo, Taofiq Segun Oyedokun, Mike Paddock, Alim Pardhan, Kinjal Patel, Quinten Paterson, Catherine Patocka, Christine Patterson, James Pearlman, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Marc Phan, Zafrina Poonja, Aubrey Powell, Kamini Premkumar, Gregor Prosen, Vishal Puri, Tanis Quaife, Ryan Raffel, Ali Raja, Randi Ramunno, Louise Rang, Suzanne Rannazzisi, Shauna Regan, Salim R. Rezaie, Milan Ridderikhof, Vanessa Rogers, Christine Roh, Dra. Maria Rosa Carrillo, Keith Rosenberg, Marina Roure, Sherri Rudinsky, Joshua Rudner, Adeeb Saleh, Will Sanderson, Owen Scheirer, Paul Schofield, Paul Schunk, Evan Schwarz, Parisa Shahrabadi, Eric Shappell, Julia Sheffield, Jonathan Sherbino, Manpreet Singh, Hector C Singson, Dave Slessor, Sam Smith, Paula Sneath, Robert Sobehart, Kerry Spearing, James Stempien, Britni Sternard, Tara Stratton, Katherine Stuart, Bob Stuntz, Michael Susalla, Colleen Sweeney, Loice Swisher, Henry Swoboda, Shahbaz Syed, Taku Taira, Nikhil Tambe, Richard Tang, Elisha Targonsky, Rachel Taylor, Alan Taylor, Todd Taylor, Paxton Ting, Gerhard Tiwald, Kelvin Tran, Evelyn Tran, Jason Trickovic, Paul Trinquero, Seth Trueger, Aaron Tyagi, Manrique Umana, Patrick Vallance, Patricia Van den Berg, Luis Vargas, Rene Verbeek, Sandra Viggers, Zlata Vlodaver, Matthew Wagner, Noorin Walji, Joe Walter, Miranda Wan, Rachel Wang, Gregory Wanner, Wyatt Warawa, Mike Ward, Jennifer Weekes, Kristen Weersink, Cara Weessies, Anna Whalen-Browne, Brian Whiteside, Matthew Willis, Jonas Wilmer, Nelson Wong, Mark Woodcroft, Rob Woods, Lawrence Yau, Jessica Yee, Calvin Yeh, Simon York Ming Huang, Katherine Yurkiw, Fareen Zaver, Alexander Zozula, Emergency Department, Graduate School, ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias, and ACS - Diabetes & metabolism
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Index (economics) ,Blogging ,Cross-sectional study ,media_common.quotation_subject ,education ,MEDLINE ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,Social media ,Quality (business) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,media_common ,Web site ,business.industry ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Critical appraisal ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Gestalt psychology ,Female ,business ,Social Media - Abstract
Study objective Online educational resources such as blogs are increasingly used for education by emergency medicine clinicians. The Social Media Index was developed to quantify their relative impact. The Medical Education Translational Resources: Indicators of Quality (METRIQ) study was conducted in part to determine the association between the Social Media Index score and quality as measured by gestalt and previously derived quality instruments. Methods Ten blogs were randomly selected from a list of emergency medicine and critical care Web sites. The 2 most recent clinically oriented blog posts published on these blogs were evaluated with gestalt, the Academic Life in Emergency Medicine Approved Instructional Resources (ALiEM AIR) score, and the METRIQ-8 score. Volunteer raters (including medical students, emergency medicine residents, and emergency medicine attending physicians) were identified with a multimodal recruitment methodology. The Social Media Index was calculated in February 2016, November 2016, April 2017, and December 2017. Pearson's correlations were calculated between the Social Media Index and the average rater gestalt, ALiEM AIR score, and METRIQ-8 score. Results A total of 309 of 330 raters completed all ratings (93.6%). The Social Media Index correlated moderately to strongly with the mean rater gestalt ratings (range 0.69 to 0.76) and moderately with the mean rater ALiEM AIR score (range 0.55 to 0.61) and METRIQ-8 score (range 0.53 to 0.57) during the month of the blog post's selection and for 2 years after. Conclusion The Social Media Index's correlation with multiple quality evaluation instruments over time supports the hypothesis that it is associated with overall Web site quality. It can play a role in guiding individuals to high-quality resources that can be reviewed with critical appraisal techniques.
- Published
- 2018
11. Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review
- Author
-
Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Michael B. Roberts, Sundip N. Patel, Hope Kilgannon, Stephanie Smith, Brian W. Roberts, and Stephen Trzeciak
- Subjects
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,Medical Doctors ,020205 medical informatics ,Health Care Providers ,Emotions ,Social Sciences ,02 engineering and technology ,Database and Informatics Methods ,0302 clinical medicine ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Psychology ,Medical Personnel ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Database Searching ,media_common ,Multidisciplinary ,Education, Medical ,Research Assessment ,Professions ,Systematic review ,Medicine ,Curriculum ,Inclusion (education) ,Research Article ,Health care quality ,animal structures ,Patients ,Systematic Reviews ,Attitude of Health Personnel ,Science ,media_common.quotation_subject ,education ,MEDLINE ,Compassion ,Empathy ,CINAHL ,Research and Analysis Methods ,03 medical and health sciences ,Physicians ,Mental Health and Psychiatry ,Humans ,Behavior ,Physician-Patient Relations ,Medical education ,Verbal Behavior ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Health Care ,People and Places ,Population Groupings ,Delivery of Health Care - Abstract
BackgroundEmpathy and compassion are vital components of health care quality; however, physicians frequently miss opportunities for empathy and compassion in patient care. Despite evidence that empathy and compassion training can be effective, the specific behaviors that should be taught remain unclear. We synthesized the biomedical literature on empathy and compassion training in medical education to find the specific curricula components (skills and behaviors) demonstrated to be effective.MethodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using a previously published comprehensive search strategy. We screened reference lists of the articles meeting inclusion criteria to identify additional studies for potential inclusion. Study inclusion criteria were: (1) intervention arm in which subjects underwent an educational curriculum aimed at enhancing empathy and/or compassion; (2) clearly defined control arm in which subjects did not receive the curriculum; (3) curriculum was tested on physicians (or physicians-in-training); and (4) outcome measure assessing the effect of the curriculum on physician empathy and/or compassion. We performed a qualitative analysis to collate and tabulate effects of tested curricula according to recommended methodology from the Cochrane Handbook. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias.ResultsFifty-two studies (total n = 5,316) met inclusion criteria. Most (75%) studies found that the tested curricula improved physician empathy and/or compassion on at least one outcome measure. We identified the following key behaviors to be effective: (1) sitting (versus standing) during the interview; (2) detecting patients' non-verbal cues of emotion; (3) recognizing and responding to opportunities for compassion; (4) non-verbal communication of caring (e.g. eye contact); and (5) verbal statements of acknowledgement, validation, and support. These behaviors were found to improve patient perception of physician empathy and/or compassion.ConclusionEvidence suggests that training can enhance physician empathy and compassion. Training curricula should incorporate the specific behaviors identified in this report.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Individual Gestalt Is Unreliable for the Evaluation of Quality in Medical Education Blogs: A METRIQ Study
- Author
-
Brent Thoma, Stefanie S. Sebok-Syer, Keeth Krishnan, Marshall Siemens, N. Seth Trueger, Isabelle Colmers-Gray, Rob Woods, Emil Petrusa, Teresa Chan, Charlotte Alexander, Mohammed Alkhalifah, Saeed Alqahtani, Scott Anderson, Shelaina Anderson, Colin Andrews, Jocelyn Andruko, Felix Ankel, Nikytha Antony, Diptesh Aryal, Barbra Backus, Jennifer Baird, Andrew Baker, Sarah Batty, Jared Baylis, Braeden Beaumont, Chris Belcher, Brent Benavides, Michael Benham, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Julian Botta, Nicholas Bouchard, Victoria Brazil, Emily Brumfield, Anthony Bryson, Wisarut Bunchit, Kat Butler, Lindy Buzikievich, David Calcara, Rob Carey, Stephen Carroll, Casey Lyons, Louise Cassidy, Kirsty Challen, Tim Chaplin, Natasha Chatham-Zvelebil, Eric Chen, Lucy Chen, Sushant Chhabra, Alvin Chin, Eric Chochi, Tina Choudhri, Jeremy Christensen, Kimberly Connors, Veronica Coppersmith, Abby Cosgrove, Gregory Costello, Kevin Cullison, Andrew D'Alessandro, Kerstin de Wit, Marie Decock, Rayan Delbani, William Denq, Julianna Deutscher, Brendan Devine, Maia Dorsett, Taylor Duda, Justin Dueweke, Teresa Dunphy, Sean Dyer, Kathryn T. Eastley, Marcia Edmonds, Ken Edwards, Robert Ehrman, Youness Elkhalidy, Preston Fedor, Brian Ficiur, Caley Flynn, Bill Fraser, Meagan Fu, James Fukakusa, Eric Funk, Damjan Gaco, Viktor Gawlik, Kenn Ghaffarian, Laleh Gharahbaghian, Phil Griffith, Andrew Griffith, Andrew Grock, Tanner Gronowski, Cathy Grossman, Jaroslaw Gucwa, Pawan Gupta, Alexandra Gustafson, Andrew Guy, Mary Haas, Stanislaw Haciski, Emina Hajdinjak, Andrew K. Hall, Regina Hammock, Jan Hansel, Alexander Hart, Larissa Hattin, Brandon Herb, SueLin Hilbert, Jesse Hill, Jeff Hill, Amy Ho, Emily House, Nina House, James Huffman, Charlie Inboriboon, Alex Ireland, Mohammed Ali Jamal, Victor Jansen, Zach Jarou, Vivian Jia, Levi Johnston, Drew Kalnow, Puneet Kapur, Seth Kelly, Kyle Kelson, William Kent, Rishi Khakhkhar, Jaasmit Khurana, Ashley Kilp, Scott Knapp, Sebastian Kohler, Ivanna Kruhlak, Nadim Lalani, Samantha Lam, Patrick Lank, Zander Laurie, Kristina Lea, Ernest Leber, Ching-Hsing Lee, Haakon Lenes, Nilantha Lenora, Jesse Leontowicz, Kelly Lien, Yingchun Lin, Michelle Lin, Andrew Little, Ivy Liu, Harry Liu, Steve Liu, Stephanie Louka, Elise Lovell, David Lowe, Ashley Lubberdink, Jessica Luc, Sheng-Hsiang Ma, Hugh MacLeod, Nick Mancuso, Anali Maneshi, Dra. Maria Rosa Carrillo, Jesse May, John Mayo, Mike McDonnell, Susan McLellan, Carolyn McQuarrie, Julia Nood, Therese Mead, Cory Meeuwisse, Patrick Meloy, Perry Menzies, Anne Messman, Stephen Miazga, Logan Mills, Ken Milne, Allan Mix, Steve Montag, Brendon Moore, Justin Morgenstern, Sarah Mott, P. Mukherj, Ali Mulla, Sheena Nandalal, Taylor Nikel, Sean Nugent, Morgan Oakland, Werner Oberholzer, Onyeka Otugo, Taofiq Segun Oyedokun, Mike Paddock, Alim Pardhan, Kinjal Patel, Quinten Paterson, Catherine Patocka, Christine Patterson, James Pearlman, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Marc Phan, Zafrina Poonja, Aubrey Powell, Kamini Premkumar, Gregor Prosen, Vishal Puri, Tanis Quaife, Ryan Raffel, Ali Raja, Randi Ramunno, Louise Rang, Suzanne Rannazzisi, Shauna Regan, Milan Ridderikhof, Vanessa Rogers, Christine Roh, Keith Rosenberg, Marina Roure, Sherri Rudinsky, Joshua Rudner, Adeeb Saleh, Will Sanderson, Owen Scheirer, Paul Schofield, Paul Schunk, Evan Schwarz, Parisa Shahrabadi, Eric Shappell, Julia Sheffield, Jonathan Sherbino, Manpreet Singh, Hector C. Singson, Dave Slessor, Sam Smith, Paula Sneath, Robert Sobehart, Kerry Spearing, James Stempien, Britni Sternard, Tara Stratton, Katherine Stuart, Bob Stuntz, Michael Susalla, Colleen Sweeney, Loice Swisher, Henry Swoboda, Shahbaz Syed, Taku Taira, Nikhil Tambe, Richard Tang, Elisha Targonsky, Rachel Taylor, Alan Taylor, Todd Taylor, Paxton Ting, Gerhard Tiwald, Kelvin Tran, Evelyn Tran, Jason Trickovic, Paul Trinquero, Seth Trueger, Aaron Tyagi, Manrique Umana, Patrick Vallance, Patricia Van den Berg, Luis Vargas, Rene Verbeek, Sandra Viggers, Zlata Vlodaver, Matthew Wagner, Noorin Walji, Joe Walter, Miranda Wan, Rachel Wang, Gregory Wanner, Wyatt Warawa, Mike Ward, Jennifer Weekes, Kristen Weersink, Cara Weessies, Anna Whalen-Browne, Brian Whiteside, Matthew Willis, Jonas Wilmer, Nelson Wong, Mark Woodcroft, Lawrence Yau, Jessica Yee, Calvin Yeh, Simon York Ming Huang, Katherine Yurkiw, Fareen Zaver, Alexander Zozula, Graduate School, Emergency Department, ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias, and ACS - Diabetes & metabolism
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Students, Medical ,Blogging ,Intraclass correlation ,media_common.quotation_subject ,education ,MEDLINE ,Likert scale ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Evaluation methods ,Medicine ,Humans ,Quality (business) ,Generalizability theory ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Reliability (statistics) ,media_common ,Medical education ,Education, Medical ,business.industry ,Internship and Residency ,Reproducibility of Results ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Gestalt Theory ,Emergency Medicine ,Gestalt psychology ,Female ,Clinical Competence ,Educational Measurement ,business ,Social Media - Abstract
Study objective Open educational resources such as blogs are increasingly used for medical education. Gestalt is generally the evaluation method used for these resources; however, little information has been published on it. We aim to evaluate the reliability of gestalt in the assessment of emergency medicine blogs. Methods We identified 60 English-language emergency medicine Web sites that posted clinically oriented blogs between January 1, 2016, and February 24, 2016. Ten Web sites were selected with a random-number generator. Medical students, emergency medicine residents, and emergency medicine attending physicians evaluated the 2 most recent clinical blog posts from each site for quality, using a 7-point Likert scale. The mean gestalt scores of each blog post were compared between groups with Pearson's correlations. Single and average measure intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated within groups. A generalizability study evaluated variance within gestalt and a decision study calculated the number of raters required to reliably (>0.8) estimate quality. Results One hundred twenty-one medical students, 88 residents, and 100 attending physicians (93.6% of enrolled participants) evaluated all 20 blog posts. Single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients within groups were fair to poor (0.36 to 0.40). Average-measure intraclass correlation coefficients were more reliable (0.811 to 0.840). Mean gestalt ratings by attending physicians correlated strongly with those by medical students (r=0.92) and residents (r=0.99). The generalizability coefficient was 0.91 for the complete data set. The decision study found that 42 gestalt ratings were required to reliably evaluate quality (>0.8). Conclusion The mean gestalt quality ratings of blog posts between medical students, residents, and attending physicians correlate strongly, but individual ratings are unreliable. With sufficient raters, mean gestalt ratings provide a community standard for assessment.
- Published
- 2016
13. Curricula and methods for physician compassion training: protocol for a systematic review
- Author
-
Hope Kilgannon, Sundip N. Patel, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Michael B. Roberts, Stephen Trzeciak, Stephanie Smith, and Brian W. Roberts
- Subjects
media_common.quotation_subject ,education ,Psychological intervention ,MEDLINE ,Compassion ,CINAHL ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physicians ,Health care ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Curriculum ,media_common ,Protocol (science) ,Medical education ,Education, Medical ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,General Medicine ,Systematic review ,Research Design ,Empathy ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Systematic Reviews as Topic - Abstract
IntroductionCompassionate patient care has been associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients. However, current evidence suggests that healthcare is experiencing a compassion crisis, with physicians frequently overlooking opportunities to treat patients with compassion. Although there is evidence that compassionate care can be enhanced through training interventions, it is currently unclear what specific skills and behaviours ought to be taught and how best to transfer this information to the learner. The objectives of this systematic review are to collate the world’s literature on compassion training to determine (1) the specific skills and behaviours that should be taught (curriculum), and (2) the methods of training that are most effective at improving compassionate patient care.Methods and analysisWe will perform a qualitative systematic review of studies aimed at improving compassionate patient care among physicians and physicians in training. We will comprehensively search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Additional recommended techniques for systematic reviews of complex evidence will be performed including pursuing selected ‘references of references’, electronic citation tracking and consulting experts in the field. Two investigators will independently review all search results. After identification and inclusion of papers, we will use a standardised form for data extraction. We will use tables to describe the study populations, interventions tested (including specific skill/behaviours taught and training methods used), outcome measures and effects of interventions on outcome measures compared with control groups. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be used for quantitative analysis of the data.Ethics and disseminationThe proposed systematic review does not require ethical approval since no individual patient-level data will be collected. Results of this study will contribute to the understanding of compassion training and help inform the development of compassion training curricula.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018095040.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.