1. Quantitating Mitral Regurgitation in Clinical Trials: The Need for a Uniform Approach
- Author
-
Judy Hung, Rachael W. Quinn, Paul A. Grayburn, James S. Gammie, and Sari D. Holmes
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Mitral regurgitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Percutaneous ,business.industry ,Clinical study design ,macromolecular substances ,law.invention ,Clinical trial ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Mitral valve ,Internal medicine ,Propensity score matching ,Medicine ,Surgery ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Grading (education) ,business - Abstract
Background There is an established relationship between the degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) and prognosis. Quantitation of MR severity guides therapeutic approaches. Inconsistent definitions and categorization of MR severity in clinical studies limit meaningful comparisons between trials and compromise development of an effective evidence base. The purpose of this study was to quantify heterogeneity in grading systems for MR severity in the contemporary literature. Methods We performed a systematic review of randomized (RCT) and propensity score (PS) adjusted clinical studies of MV interventions (surgical or percutaneous). A total of 35 articles from 2015-2020 were included (15 RCT, 20 PS). Results There were 22 studies that reported MR severity in numerical categories, either values from the historical “plus” system or numerical MR grades, while 9 studies reported MR severity using text-only descriptive categories. Among the studies that used numerical categories, 2+ MR was defined as moderate in 64% of studies, mild in 27%, and mild-moderate in 9% and 3+ MR was defined as moderate in 14%, moderate-severe in 52%, and severe in 14%. Conclusions There was substantial variability in MR severity definition and reporting in contemporary clinical studies of MV interventions. We recommend the historical “plus” numerical grading system be abandoned and that inclusion and outcome criteria in MR clinical trials be based on American and European guideline-recommended categories as none/trace, mild, moderate, and severe. Adoption of these simple recommendations will improve the consistency and quality of MR clinical trial design and reporting.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF