1. An analysis of retracted papers in Computer Science
- Author
-
Martin Shepperd and Leila Yousefi
- Subjects
cellular neuroscience ,FOS: Computer and information sciences ,Multidisciplinary ,systematic reviews ,computer and information sciences ,Computer Science - Digital Libraries ,database searching ,Computer Science - Information Retrieval ,meta-analysis ,scientific misconduct ,citation analysis ,Digital Libraries (cs.DL) ,archives ,Information Retrieval (cs.IR) - Abstract
Context: The retraction of research papers, for whatever reason, is a growing phenomenon. However, although retracted paper information is publicly available via publishers, it is somewhat distributed and inconsistent. Objective: The aim is to assess: (i) the extent and nature of retracted research in Computer Science (CS) (ii) the post-retraction citation behaviour of retracted works and (iii) the potential impact on systematic reviews and mapping studies. Method: We analyse the Retraction Watch database and take citation information from the Web of Science and Google scholar. Results: We find that of the 33,955 entries in the Retraction watch database (16 May 2022), 2,816 are classified as CS, i.e., approximately 8.3%. For CS, 56% of retracted papers, provide little or no information as to the reasons. This contrasts with 26% for other disciplines. There is also a remarkable disparity between different publishers, a tendency for multiple versions of a retracted paper over and above the Version of Record (VoR), and for new citations long after a paper is officially retracted. Conclusions: Unfortunately retraction seems to be a sufficiently common outcome for a scientific paper that we as a research community need to take it more seriously, e.g., standardising procedures and taxonomies across publishers and the provision of appropriate research tools. Finally, we recommend particular caution when undertaking secondary analyses and meta-analyses which are at risk of becoming contaminated by these problem primary studies., Comment: This is a preprint of the paper submitted to PLOS ONE
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF