Search

The use of a subcostal (or sub-xiphisternal) approach to biopsy of the left lobe of the liver is less painful and causes lower rates of pneumothorax and damage to intercostal vessels and nerves, although necessitating a steeper needle angle and deeper hepatic penetration. We report a case of superior epigastric artery haemorrhage following percutaneous liver biopsy through this approach. Emergency ligation of the left superior epigastric artery achieved haemostasis. Multi-phase computed tomography angiography may aid the detection of small bleeding from the artery. The presence of a midline extraperitoneal haemorrhage should raise suspicion of superior epigastric artery injury.Copyright © 2017 Hong Kong College of Radiologists.

The use of a subcostal (or sub-xiphisternal) approach to biopsy of the left lobe of the liver is less painful and causes lower rates of pneumothorax and damage to intercostal vessels and nerves, although necessitating a steeper needle angle and deeper hepatic penetration. We report a case of superior epigastric artery haemorrhage following percutaneous liver biopsy through this approach. Emergency ligation of the left superior epigastric artery achieved haemostasis. Multi-phase computed tomography angiography may aid the detection of small bleeding from the artery. The presence of a midline extraperitoneal haemorrhage should raise suspicion of superior epigastric artery injury.Copyright © 2017 Hong Kong College of Radiologists.

La reconstrucción mamaria postmastectomía puede suponer un importante consumo de recursos humanos y económicos para cualquier sistema sanitario. El propósito de este estudio es saber si el peso económico asignado por el Sistema Nacional de Salud Español según codificación mediante Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico a los dos procedimientos principales de reconstrucción mamaria, se ajusta al gasto inferido según el consumo de recursos real de las pacientes. Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de cohortes para evaluar el coste económico de 134 pacientes intervenidas de reconstrucción mamaria unilateral diferida mediante los procedimientos expansor-prótesis (E-P) y colgajo de perforantes de la arteria epigástrica inferior profunda (DIEP), durante el periodo comprendido entre 2005 y 2013. Los datos analizados e inferidos de las pacientes fueron los costes directos intrahospitalarios y extrahospitalarios tanto de la cirugía inicial de reconstrucción como de los procedimientos secundarios. Las pacientes reconstruidas con E-P precisaron un mayor número de cirugías para completar su reconstrucción, y presentaron mayor porcentaje de complicaciones relacionadas con la cirugía. El porcentaje de cirugías de retoque estético fue superior en la reconstrucción DIEP. No encontramos diferencias significativas en el coste total inferido de las pacientes entre ambas cohortes (18.857,77 € DIEP frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p=0,89). El coste total de la reconstrucción mamaria según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico fue inferior al coste total inferido de las pacientes para ambas cohortes (11.596,43 € frente a 18.857,77 €, p<0,001 DIEP; 13.565,82 € frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p<0,001). El coste de la reconstrucción mamaria está inadecuadamente tarifado por los gestores sanitarios; el coste según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico es inferior al coste inferido de las pacientes para cualquiera de los dos procedimientos. Consideramos que la reconstrucción con colgajo DIEP es más cost, Mastectomy breast reconstruction can be a significant consumption of human and financial resources for any health system. The purpose of this study is whether the economic weight assigned by the Spanish National Health System as encoding by Healthcare Resource Groups to two major breast reconstruction procedures fits true estimate of patients. A retrospective cohort study has been performed to evaluate the economic cost of 134 patients operated on for unilateral breast reconstruction delayed by the expander-prosthesis (E-P) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) procedures during the period between 2005 and 2013. The data analyzed and economic cost estimated of the patients were in-hospital and out-patient direct costs of both the initial reconstruction surgery as secondary procedures. Patients undergoing E-P reconstruction required a higher number of surgery sessions to complete the reconstruction procedure and showed higher rates of surgery-related complications. The percentage of surgery required for aesthetic retouch was higher in patients reconstituted with DIEP flap. No statistically significant differences were found regarding total cost between the two cohorts (18.857,77 € DIEP vs 20.502,08 € E-P, p = 0,89). Total cost of breast reconstruction according Healthcare Resource Groups was lower than total estimated cost of patients for both cohorts (11.596,43 € vs € 18.857,77 €, p < 0.001 DIEP; 13,565.82 vs 20,502.08 €, p < 0.001 E-P). The cost of breast reconstruction is inadequately tariffed by health managers; the cost using Healthcare Resource Groups is less than the estimated cost of the patients to either procedures. We consider that DIEP flap reconstruction is more cost- effective than E-P reconstruction, as it requires less surgical procedures, presents lower complication rate and remains more stable over time.

La reconstrucción mamaria postmastectomía puede suponer un importante consumo de recursos humanos y económicos para cualquier sistema sanitario. El propósito de este estudio es saber si el peso económico asignado por el Sistema Nacional de Salud Español según codificación mediante Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico a los dos procedimientos principales de reconstrucción mamaria, se ajusta al gasto inferido según el consumo de recursos real de las pacientes. Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de cohortes para evaluar el coste económico de 134 pacientes intervenidas de reconstrucción mamaria unilateral diferida mediante los procedimientos expansor-prótesis (E-P) y colgajo de perforantes de la arteria epigástrica inferior profunda (DIEP), durante el periodo comprendido entre 2005 y 2013. Los datos analizados e inferidos de las pacientes fueron los costes directos intrahospitalarios y extrahospitalarios tanto de la cirugía inicial de reconstrucción como de los procedimientos secundarios. Las pacientes reconstruidas con E-P precisaron un mayor número de cirugías para completar su reconstrucción, y presentaron mayor porcentaje de complicaciones relacionadas con la cirugía. El porcentaje de cirugías de retoque estético fue superior en la reconstrucción DIEP. No encontramos diferencias significativas en el coste total inferido de las pacientes entre ambas cohortes (18.857,77 € DIEP frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p=0,89). El coste total de la reconstrucción mamaria según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico fue inferior al coste total inferido de las pacientes para ambas cohortes (11.596,43 € frente a 18.857,77 €, p<0,001 DIEP; 13.565,82 € frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p<0,001). El coste de la reconstrucción mamaria está inadecuadamente tarifado por los gestores sanitarios; el coste según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico es inferior al coste inferido de las pacientes para cualquiera de los dos procedimientos. Consideramos que la reconstrucción con colgajo DIEP es más cost, Mastectomy breast reconstruction can be a significant consumption of human and financial resources for any health system. The purpose of this study is whether the economic weight assigned by the Spanish National Health System as encoding by Healthcare Resource Groups to two major breast reconstruction procedures fits true estimate of patients. A retrospective cohort study has been performed to evaluate the economic cost of 134 patients operated on for unilateral breast reconstruction delayed by the expander-prosthesis (E-P) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) procedures during the period between 2005 and 2013. The data analyzed and economic cost estimated of the patients were in-hospital and out-patient direct costs of both the initial reconstruction surgery as secondary procedures. Patients undergoing E-P reconstruction required a higher number of surgery sessions to complete the reconstruction procedure and showed higher rates of surgery-related complications. The percentage of surgery required for aesthetic retouch was higher in patients reconstituted with DIEP flap. No statistically significant differences were found regarding total cost between the two cohorts (18.857,77 € DIEP vs 20.502,08 € E-P, p = 0,89). Total cost of breast reconstruction according Healthcare Resource Groups was lower than total estimated cost of patients for both cohorts (11.596,43 € vs € 18.857,77 €, p < 0.001 DIEP; 13,565.82 vs 20,502.08 €, p < 0.001 E-P). The cost of breast reconstruction is inadequately tariffed by health managers; the cost using Healthcare Resource Groups is less than the estimated cost of the patients to either procedures. We consider that DIEP flap reconstruction is more cost- effective than E-P reconstruction, as it requires less surgical procedures, presents lower complication rate and remains more stable over time.

La reconstrucción mamaria postmastectomía puede suponer un importante consumo de recursos humanos y económicos para cualquier sistema sanitario. El propósito de este estudio es saber si el peso económico asignado por el Sistema Nacional de Salud Español según codificación mediante Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico a los dos procedimientos principales de reconstrucción mamaria, se ajusta al gasto inferido según el consumo de recursos real de las pacientes. Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de cohortes para evaluar el coste económico de 134 pacientes intervenidas de reconstrucción mamaria unilateral diferida mediante los procedimientos expansor-prótesis (E-P) y colgajo de perforantes de la arteria epigástrica inferior profunda (DIEP), durante el periodo comprendido entre 2005 y 2013. Los datos analizados e inferidos de las pacientes fueron los costes directos intrahospitalarios y extrahospitalarios tanto de la cirugía inicial de reconstrucción como de los procedimientos secundarios. Las pacientes reconstruidas con E-P precisaron un mayor número de cirugías para completar su reconstrucción, y presentaron mayor porcentaje de complicaciones relacionadas con la cirugía. El porcentaje de cirugías de retoque estético fue superior en la reconstrucción DIEP. No encontramos diferencias significativas en el coste total inferido de las pacientes entre ambas cohortes (18.857,77 € DIEP frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p=0,89). El coste total de la reconstrucción mamaria según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico fue inferior al coste total inferido de las pacientes para ambas cohortes (11.596,43 € frente a 18.857,77 €, p<0,001 DIEP; 13.565,82 € frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p<0,001). El coste de la reconstrucción mamaria está inadecuadamente tarifado por los gestores sanitarios; el coste según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico es inferior al coste inferido de las pacientes para cualquiera de los dos procedimientos. Consideramos que la reconstrucción con colgajo DIEP es más cost, Mastectomy breast reconstruction can be a significant consumption of human and financial resources for any health system. The purpose of this study is whether the economic weight assigned by the Spanish National Health System as encoding by Healthcare Resource Groups to two major breast reconstruction procedures fits true estimate of patients. A retrospective cohort study has been performed to evaluate the economic cost of 134 patients operated on for unilateral breast reconstruction delayed by the expander-prosthesis (E-P) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) procedures during the period between 2005 and 2013. The data analyzed and economic cost estimated of the patients were in-hospital and out-patient direct costs of both the initial reconstruction surgery as secondary procedures. Patients undergoing E-P reconstruction required a higher number of surgery sessions to complete the reconstruction procedure and showed higher rates of surgery-related complications. The percentage of surgery required for aesthetic retouch was higher in patients reconstituted with DIEP flap. No statistically significant differences were found regarding total cost between the two cohorts (18.857,77 € DIEP vs 20.502,08 € E-P, p = 0,89). Total cost of breast reconstruction according Healthcare Resource Groups was lower than total estimated cost of patients for both cohorts (11.596,43 € vs € 18.857,77 €, p < 0.001 DIEP; 13,565.82 vs 20,502.08 €, p < 0.001 E-P). The cost of breast reconstruction is inadequately tariffed by health managers; the cost using Healthcare Resource Groups is less than the estimated cost of the patients to either procedures. We consider that DIEP flap reconstruction is more cost- effective than E-P reconstruction, as it requires less surgical procedures, presents lower complication rate and remains more stable over time.

La reconstrucción mamaria postmastectomía puede suponer un importante consumo de recursos humanos y económicos para cualquier sistema sanitario. El propósito de este estudio es saber si el peso económico asignado por el Sistema Nacional de Salud Español según codificación mediante Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico a los dos procedimientos principales de reconstrucción mamaria, se ajusta al gasto inferido según el consumo de recursos real de las pacientes. Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de cohortes para evaluar el coste económico de 134 pacientes intervenidas de reconstrucción mamaria unilateral diferida mediante los procedimientos expansor-prótesis (E-P) y colgajo de perforantes de la arteria epigástrica inferior profunda (DIEP), durante el periodo comprendido entre 2005 y 2013. Los datos analizados e inferidos de las pacientes fueron los costes directos intrahospitalarios y extrahospitalarios tanto de la cirugía inicial de reconstrucción como de los procedimientos secundarios. Las pacientes reconstruidas con E-P precisaron un mayor número de cirugías para completar su reconstrucción, y presentaron mayor porcentaje de complicaciones relacionadas con la cirugía. El porcentaje de cirugías de retoque estético fue superior en la reconstrucción DIEP. No encontramos diferencias significativas en el coste total inferido de las pacientes entre ambas cohortes (18.857,77 € DIEP frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p=0,89). El coste total de la reconstrucción mamaria según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico fue inferior al coste total inferido de las pacientes para ambas cohortes (11.596,43 € frente a 18.857,77 €, p<0,001 DIEP; 13.565,82 € frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p<0,001). El coste de la reconstrucción mamaria está inadecuadamente tarifado por los gestores sanitarios; el coste según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico es inferior al coste inferido de las pacientes para cualquiera de los dos procedimientos. Consideramos que la reconstrucción con colgajo DIEP es más cost, Mastectomy breast reconstruction can be a significant consumption of human and financial resources for any health system. The purpose of this study is whether the economic weight assigned by the Spanish National Health System as encoding by Healthcare Resource Groups to two major breast reconstruction procedures fits true estimate of patients. A retrospective cohort study has been performed to evaluate the economic cost of 134 patients operated on for unilateral breast reconstruction delayed by the expander-prosthesis (E-P) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) procedures during the period between 2005 and 2013. The data analyzed and economic cost estimated of the patients were in-hospital and out-patient direct costs of both the initial reconstruction surgery as secondary procedures. Patients undergoing E-P reconstruction required a higher number of surgery sessions to complete the reconstruction procedure and showed higher rates of surgery-related complications. The percentage of surgery required for aesthetic retouch was higher in patients reconstituted with DIEP flap. No statistically significant differences were found regarding total cost between the two cohorts (18.857,77 € DIEP vs 20.502,08 € E-P, p = 0,89). Total cost of breast reconstruction according Healthcare Resource Groups was lower than total estimated cost of patients for both cohorts (11.596,43 € vs € 18.857,77 €, p < 0.001 DIEP; 13,565.82 vs 20,502.08 €, p < 0.001 E-P). The cost of breast reconstruction is inadequately tariffed by health managers; the cost using Healthcare Resource Groups is less than the estimated cost of the patients to either procedures. We consider that DIEP flap reconstruction is more cost- effective than E-P reconstruction, as it requires less surgical procedures, presents lower complication rate and remains more stable over time.

La reconstrucción mamaria postmastectomía puede suponer un importante consumo de recursos humanos y económicos para cualquier sistema sanitario. El propósito de este estudio es saber si el peso económico asignado por el Sistema Nacional de Salud Español según codificación mediante Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico a los dos procedimientos principales de reconstrucción mamaria, se ajusta al gasto inferido según el consumo de recursos real de las pacientes. Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de cohortes para evaluar el coste económico de 134 pacientes intervenidas de reconstrucción mamaria unilateral diferida mediante los procedimientos expansor-prótesis (E-P) y colgajo de perforantes de la arteria epigástrica inferior profunda (DIEP), durante el periodo comprendido entre 2005 y 2013. Los datos analizados e inferidos de las pacientes fueron los costes directos intrahospitalarios y extrahospitalarios tanto de la cirugía inicial de reconstrucción como de los procedimientos secundarios. Las pacientes reconstruidas con E-P precisaron un mayor número de cirugías para completar su reconstrucción, y presentaron mayor porcentaje de complicaciones relacionadas con la cirugía. El porcentaje de cirugías de retoque estético fue superior en la reconstrucción DIEP. No encontramos diferencias significativas en el coste total inferido de las pacientes entre ambas cohortes (18.857,77 € DIEP frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p=0,89). El coste total de la reconstrucción mamaria según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico fue inferior al coste total inferido de las pacientes para ambas cohortes (11.596,43 € frente a 18.857,77 €, p<0,001 DIEP; 13.565,82 € frente a 20.502,08 € E-P, p<0,001). El coste de la reconstrucción mamaria está inadecuadamente tarifado por los gestores sanitarios; el coste según Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico es inferior al coste inferido de las pacientes para cualquiera de los dos procedimientos. Consideramos que la reconstrucción con colgajo DIEP es más cost, Mastectomy breast reconstruction can be a significant consumption of human and financial resources for any health system. The purpose of this study is whether the economic weight assigned by the Spanish National Health System as encoding by Healthcare Resource Groups to two major breast reconstruction procedures fits true estimate of patients. A retrospective cohort study has been performed to evaluate the economic cost of 134 patients operated on for unilateral breast reconstruction delayed by the expander-prosthesis (E-P) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) procedures during the period between 2005 and 2013. The data analyzed and economic cost estimated of the patients were in-hospital and out-patient direct costs of both the initial reconstruction surgery as secondary procedures. Patients undergoing E-P reconstruction required a higher number of surgery sessions to complete the reconstruction procedure and showed higher rates of surgery-related complications. The percentage of surgery required for aesthetic retouch was higher in patients reconstituted with DIEP flap. No statistically significant differences were found regarding total cost between the two cohorts (18.857,77 € DIEP vs 20.502,08 € E-P, p = 0,89). Total cost of breast reconstruction according Healthcare Resource Groups was lower than total estimated cost of patients for both cohorts (11.596,43 € vs € 18.857,77 €, p < 0.001 DIEP; 13,565.82 vs 20,502.08 €, p < 0.001 E-P). The cost of breast reconstruction is inadequately tariffed by health managers; the cost using Healthcare Resource Groups is less than the estimated cost of the patients to either procedures. We consider that DIEP flap reconstruction is more cost- effective than E-P reconstruction, as it requires less surgical procedures, presents lower complication rate and remains more stable over time.

A retrospective review of medical records was performed to assess the incidence and type of significant complications encountered during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Two hundred and sixty-five consecutive patients were reviewed between the years 1994 and August 2001. Two hundred and thirty-two laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomies and 33 total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed. The operations were performed at Monash Medical Centre, a Melbourne tertiary public hospital, and two Melbourne private hospitals, by three surgeons. Ten significant complications occurred. There were two cases of ureteric fistula, two bladder injuries, two bowel obstructions, two postoperative haematomas, one case of a bladder fistula and one superficial epigastric artery injury In-patient stay ranged from two to six days. Our complication and in-patient stay rates are consistent with previously reported rates.

A retrospective review of medical records was performed to assess the incidence and type of significant complications encountered during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Two hundred and sixty-five consecutive patients were reviewed between the years 1994 and August 2001. Two hundred and thirty-two laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomies and 33 total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed. The operations were performed at Monash Medical Centre, a Melbourne tertiary public hospital, and two Melbourne private hospitals, by three surgeons. Ten significant complications occurred. There were two cases of ureteric fistula, two bladder injuries, two bowel obstructions, two postoperative haematomas, one case of a bladder fistula and one superficial epigastric artery injury In-patient stay ranged from two to six days. Our complication and in-patient stay rates are consistent with previously reported rates.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography versus color Doppler ultrasonography (US) for perforating artery identification, intramuscular course of perforator vessel assessment, and superficial venous communication detection before a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) procedure for breast reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent and institutional review board approval were obtained. Forty-five patients underwent multidetector CT angiography and color Doppler US to identify the DIEP vessel prior to breast reconstruction surgery. Findings at surgery were used as a reference for accuracy evaluations. RESULTS: The accuracy for identifying dominant perforator arteries was 97% for color Doppler US and 91% for CT angiography. Perforator arteries suitable for surgery were identified in 90% of cases with color Doppler US and in 95% of cases with CT angiography. For measurement of perforator calibers, surgical findings were similar to color Doppler US measurements (P = .33) but were significantly different than CT measurements (P < .0001). The accuracies for intramuscular course of perforator vessel assessment and superficial venous communication detection were 95% and 97% for CT and 84% and 80% for color Doppler US, respectively. In our population, the absence of superficial venous communication was associated with a risk for flap morbidity (P = .009). CONCLUSION: Both color Doppler US and CT angiography resulted in accurate DIEP mapping. Color Doppler US was superior for measuring perforator artery calibers, and CT angiography was superior for estimating the intramuscular course of the perforator vessel and identifying superficial venous communications. Considering x-ray exposure and results of this study, employing multidetector CT angiography is suggested only in selected cases.

A retrospective review of medical records was performed to assess the incidence and types of significant complications encountered during laparoscopic hysterectomy which would affect the use of a laparoscopic approach versus other routes of hysterectomy. A total of 526 consecutive patients' medical data between January 1994 and August 2007 were reviewed. Two hundred and thirty-two laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and 294 total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed at Monash Medical Centre, a Melbourne tertiary public hospital, and three Melbourne private hospitals, by or under the supervision of three surgeons. Sixteen significant complications occurred. There were two cases of ureteric fistula, two bladder injuries, two bowel obstructions, four postoperative haematomas, one case of a bladder fistula, four conversions to laparotomy and one superficial epigastric artery injury. Inpatient stay ranged from two to six days. Our complication and inpatient stay rates are consistent with the previously reported rates, although there has been a reduction of incidence of visceral injuries with experience and introduction of new equipment. © 2009 The Authors.

A retrospective review of medical records was performed to assess the incidence and types of significant complications encountered during laparoscopic hysterectomy which would affect the use of a laparoscopic approach versus other routes of hysterectomy. A total of 526 consecutive patients' medical data between January 1994 and August 2007 were reviewed. Two hundred and thirty-two laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and 294 total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed at Monash Medical Centre, a Melbourne tertiary public hospital, and three Melbourne private hospitals, by or under the supervision of three surgeons. Sixteen significant complications occurred. There were two cases of ureteric fistula, two bladder injuries, two bowel obstructions, four postoperative haematomas, one case of a bladder fistula, four conversions to laparotomy and one superficial epigastric artery injury. Inpatient stay ranged from two to six days. Our complication and inpatient stay rates are consistent with the previously reported rates, although there has been a reduction of incidence of visceral injuries with experience and introduction of new equipment. © 2009 The Authors.