Search

Manifestacija Holokaust: nasleđe fašizma u organizaciji Spomen-parka "Kragujevački oktobar" i Laboratorije za izučavanje Holokausta Instituta za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju održava se povodom Međunarodnog dana sećanja na žrtve Holokausta (27. januar). Manifestacija pristupa komemoraciji kroz negovanje mišljenja, znanja i obrazovanja o Holokaustu i njegovim posledica na prostoru Republike Srbije i šire. U okviru programa ovogodišnje, četvrte po redu manifestacije, o memorijalima i antifašističkom nasleđu u doba kulture održivog zaborava govorio je dr Branislav Dimitrijević., The event Holocaust: The legacy of fascism is organized by the Memorial Park "Kragujevac October" on the occasion of the International Holocaust Remembrance Day (January 27th). The event frames commemoration through nurturing thinking, knowledge and education about the Holocaust and its consequences on the territory of the Republic of Serbia and beyond. As part of this year's program, Dr Branislav Dimitrijevic spoke about memorials and anti-fascist heritage in the age of the culture of sustainable oblivion.

This article focuses on the collection of funeral notices and memorabilia held in the resources of the Social Life Documents unit of the University Library in Poznań. The collection includes a large number of funeral notices and commemorative cards. Both types of texts can be distinguished by their function and characteristic features, though both are related components of the consituation of the contents of the text in terms of their approach to identifying the death of a specific person. Both funeral notices and funeral cards provide significant insights and constitute an important source in relevant social research that supports a deeper understanding of our communities., Tekst traktuje o zbiorach funeralnych znajdujących się w zasobach Pracowni Dokumentów Życia Społecznego Biblioteki Uniwersyteckiej w Poznaniu. Należą do nich m.in. nekrologii oraz obrazki komemoratywne. Oba rodzaje tekstów można zróżnicować ze względu na funkcję i cechy zewnętrzne, łączy je natomiast konsytuacyjność w odniesieniu do śmierci konkretnej osoby. Zarówno nekrologi, jak i karty pogrzebowe pozostają ważnym źródłem do badań.

This article focuses on the collection of funeral notices and memorabilia held in the resources of the Social Life Documents unit of the University Library in Poznań. The collection includes a large number of funeral notices and commemorative cards. Both types of texts can be distinguished by their function and characteristic features, though both are related components of the consituation of the contents of the text in terms of their approach to identifying the death of a specific person. Both funeral notices and funeral cards provide significant insights and constitute an important source in relevant social research that supports a deeper understanding of our communities., Tekst traktuje o zbiorach funeralnych znajdujących się w zasobach Pracowni Dokumentów Życia Społecznego Biblioteki Uniwersyteckiej w Poznaniu. Należą do nich m.in. nekrologii oraz obrazki komemoratywne. Oba rodzaje tekstów można zróżnicować ze względu na funkcję i cechy zewnętrzne, łączy je natomiast konsytuacyjność w odniesieniu do śmierci konkretnej osoby. Zarówno nekrologi, jak i karty pogrzebowe pozostają ważnym źródłem do badań.

Manifestacija Holokaust: nasleđe fašizma u organizaciji Spomen-parka "Kragujevački oktobar" i Laboratorije za izučavanje Holokausta Instituta za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju održava se povodom Međunarodnog dana sećanja na žrtve Holokausta (27. januar). Manifestacija pristupa komemoraciji kroz negovanje mišljenja, znanja i obrazovanja o Holokaustu i njegovim posledica na prostoru Republike Srbije i šire. U okviru programa ovogodišnje, četvrte po redu manifestacije, o memorijalima i antifašističkom nasleđu u doba kulture održivog zaborava govorio je dr Branislav Dimitrijević., The event Holocaust: The legacy of fascism is organized by the Memorial Park "Kragujevac October" on the occasion of the International Holocaust Remembrance Day (January 27th). The event frames commemoration through nurturing thinking, knowledge and education about the Holocaust and its consequences on the territory of the Republic of Serbia and beyond. As part of this year's program, Dr Branislav Dimitrijevic spoke about memorials and anti-fascist heritage in the age of the culture of sustainable oblivion.

В статье рассматривается место второй мировой войны в мемориальном наследии Великобритании. Показывается многоуровневое отношение к войне в общественном сознании. В коллективной памяти о войне соединяются различные эмоциональные и рассудочные компоненты, непосредственный опыт участников событий и превалирующий в послевоенный период исторический нарратив, связанный с представлениями о войне. Обращается внимание на эволюцию представлений о войне в ходе трансформации самого британского общества и изменения места Великобритании в мировой политике., The article examines the place of the World War II in the memorial heritage of Britain. The article shows a multi-level attitude to war in the public consciousness. The collective memory of the war combines various emotional and intellectual components, the direct experience of the participants, and the historical narrative that prevails in the postwar period, associated with ideas about the war. Attention is drawn to the evolution of ideas about war in the course of the transformation of British society itself and the changing place of Britain in world politics.

U članku se vodi polemika s tekstom Dragiše Vasića objavljenom u prethodnom broju Tokova istorije. Analizira se metodologija koju Vasić koristi, izvori na kojima je zasnovao svoje teze, argumentacija koja se koristi, literatura na koju se autor poziva. Posebna pažnja je poklonjenja završnom delu njegovog teksta, koji je ocenjen kao politički pamflet nedostojan naučnog časopisa., The article is a polemic with the text by Dragiša Vasić entitled "History and Ethnic Identity in Sarajevo Fog: Examples of Politicizing and Mythologizing the Bosniak Historical Narrative," published in the previous issue of Tokovi istorije. It analyzes the methodology used by Vasić, the sources on which he based his thesis, his argumentation, and his references. Special attention is given to the final part of Vasić's text, which was assessed as a political pamphlet unworthy of a scientific journal.

Tekst o održanom nastavnom času povodom Dana sjećanja na žrtve Drugog svjetskog rata opisuje ideju i realizaciju samog časa. Akcenat je na pojmovima: genocid, holokaust, kultura sjećanja te na korištenju stečenih znanja iz različitih oblasti., The text on a school class apropos the Second World War Victims Memorial Day describes the premise and the practical realization of this class. The accent is placed on keywords such as genocide, holocaust, and memory culture. Additional focus is directed toward using a wide array of knowledge taken from other fields of inquiry.

U članku se vodi polemika s tekstom Dragiše Vasića objavljenom u prethodnom broju Tokova istorije. Analizira se metodologija koju Vasić koristi, izvori na kojima je zasnovao svoje teze, argumentacija koja se koristi, literatura na koju se autor poziva. Posebna pažnja je poklonjenja završnom delu njegovog teksta, koji je ocenjen kao politički pamflet nedostojan naučnog časopisa., The article is a polemic with the text by Dragiša Vasić entitled "History and Ethnic Identity in Sarajevo Fog: Examples of Politicizing and Mythologizing the Bosniak Historical Narrative," published in the previous issue of Tokovi istorije. It analyzes the methodology used by Vasić, the sources on which he based his thesis, his argumentation, and his references. Special attention is given to the final part of Vasić's text, which was assessed as a political pamphlet unworthy of a scientific journal.

У раду се кроз широк хронолошки оквир проучава један сегмент српско-руских односно југословенско-совјетских односа у периоду од 1914. до 1991. г. Руски гробни комплекси, под којима се подразумевају гробља, парцеле, гробнице, костурнице, споменици и надгробници настали током 20. века на територији данашње Србије, представљају добре илустрације динамике односа између две државе и два народа у претходном веку. На њиховом примеру праћени су (дис)континуитети на релацији Београд-Москва(Петроград) и истовремено је анализирана меморијална и комеморативна пракса, и култура сећања два идеолошки супротна режима – Краљевине Срба Хрвата и Словенаца/Краљевине Југославије и Демократске Федеративне Југославије/Федеративне Народне Републике Југославије/ Социјалистичке Федеративне Републике Југославије. Однос државе према комплексима руских војника, бранилаца Београда, бораца са Солунског фронта и аустроугарских заробљеника из Првог светског рата; руских емиграната; ратника из редова Црвене Армије погинулих током Другог светског рата и совјетских ратних ветерана настрадалих 1964. г. на Авали, био је у директној вези, међузависности од југословенске спољне политике, њених промена и заокрета, као и совјетско-југословенских међудржавних односа. Тај однос је могуће свести на бригу, упросторавање и материјализацију успомена на настрадале припаднике руског народа; индиферентност, односно нехај и заборав. Еволуција и борба сећања су пратиле промене на државном, спољнополитичком, плану и биле су у већој мери везане за периоде сарадње односно неслагања две земље. Међутим, слика односа према руским гробним комплексима није тако једнострана и једноставна – попут и самих српско-руских односно југословенско-совјетских односа. Иако је политика представљала најважнији фактор, постојао је и известан број других, које не би требало занемаривати. Поред културе сећања, у средишту пажње дисертације је и танатополитика – употреба смрти, уопштено говорећи, Руса (с обзиром да су етнички Руси сачињавали ок

The article analyzes the correlation and struggle between the tendencies of self-affirmation and repentance in the official politics of memory of modern Russia. The material for observation was the process of elaboration of historical memory in connection with the problem of rehabilitation of repressed citizens of the USSR. The methodological basis of the study was the conceptual apparatus of the concept of a “new memorial culture”. The state of the ongoing ideological civil war in the field of perpetuating the memory of victims of political repression is stated. The author focuses on the category “memory culture”, which determines the need for public rehabilitation and overcoming disunity with other peoples on the basis of the historical memory of a single totalitarian past., В статье проанализировано соотношение и борьба между тенденциями самоутверждения и покаяния в официальной политике памяти современной России. Материалом для наблюдения избран процесс проработки исторической памяти в связи с проблемой реабилитации репрессированных граждан СССР. Методологической основой исследования стал понятийный аппарат концепции «новой мемориальной культуры». Констатируется состояние продолжающейся идеологической гражданской войны в сфере увековечения памяти жертв политических репрессий. Автор акцентирует внимание на категории «культура памяти», которая определяет необходимость публичной реабилитации и преодоления разобщенности с другими народами на почве исторической памяти единого тоталитарного прошлого.

Вивчено культурологічні аспекти взаємодії сучасних мистецьких практик з digital-технологіями в умовах гібридних технологій інформаційних просторів посткультури, з’ясовано ризики процесів комодифікації візуальних практик та культивації історико-культурної амнезії, що деформують культурну пам’ять суспільної свідомості та нівелюють сутнісну ідентифікацію мистецтва. Аргументаційна база наукового дослідження спирається на корпус аналітичних міркувань відомих західних і вітчизняних фахівців., The paper is focused on the cultural aspects of the interaction of contemporary art practices with the digital technologies under hybrid conditions of post-culture information spaces. The risks of the commodification processes of visual practices and cultivation of historical and cultural amnesia, which deform the cultural memory of the public consciousness and level the essential identification of art, are clarified. The reasoning of the paper is based on a substantive body of analytical considerations by well-known Western and domestic experts.

U radu se analiziraju stavovi građana Srbije prema Socijalističkoj Federativnoj Republici Jugoslaviji, iskazani u periodu postepene stabilizacije kapitalističkog poretka. Analiza se temelji na podacima prikupljenim 2012. godine na reprezentativnom uzorku stanovništva Srbije, u okviru projekta Instituta za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu. Nalazi istraživanja su pokazali da je u periodu ubrzane transformacije društva pozitivno mišljenje o socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji veoma prisutno među građanima Srbije. Ipak, postoje statistički značajne razlike u stepenu prihvatanja projugoslovenskih stavova među različitim društvenim grupama, pri čemu se kao važni faktori izdvajaju starost, klasno-slojna pripadnost i vrednosne orijentacije ispitanika., The paper analyzes the attitudes of Serbian citizens towards the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, expressed during the period of gradual stabilization of the capitalist order. The analysis is based on the data collected in 2012 on a representative sample of population in Serbia, within a project of the Institute for Sociological Research of the University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy. Research findings showed that, in the period of accelerated transformation of society, positive opinion about socialist Yugoslavia was very pronounced among Serbian citizens. However, there are statistically significant differences in the level of agreement with pro-Yugoslav attitudes among different social groups, as respondents' age, social class and value orientations are identified as important factors.

U radu se analiziraju stavovi građana Srbije prema Socijalističkoj Federativnoj Republici Jugoslaviji, iskazani u periodu postepene stabilizacije kapitalističkog poretka. Analiza se temelji na podacima prikupljenim 2012. godine na reprezentativnom uzorku stanovništva Srbije, u okviru projekta Instituta za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu. Nalazi istraživanja su pokazali da je u periodu ubrzane transformacije društva pozitivno mišljenje o socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji veoma prisutno među građanima Srbije. Ipak, postoje statistički značajne razlike u stepenu prihvatanja projugoslovenskih stavova među različitim društvenim grupama, pri čemu se kao važni faktori izdvajaju starost, klasno-slojna pripadnost i vrednosne orijentacije ispitanika., The paper analyzes the attitudes of Serbian citizens towards the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, expressed during the period of gradual stabilization of the capitalist order. The analysis is based on the data collected in 2012 on a representative sample of population in Serbia, within a project of the Institute for Sociological Research of the University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy. Research findings showed that, in the period of accelerated transformation of society, positive opinion about socialist Yugoslavia was very pronounced among Serbian citizens. However, there are statistically significant differences in the level of agreement with pro-Yugoslav attitudes among different social groups, as respondents' age, social class and value orientations are identified as important factors.

У раду се, применом методе квантитативне и квалитативне анализе и интерпретације те каузалне методе, разматра савремена косовскометохијска ходонимија. Општа запажања илуструју се делом актуелне урбанонимије Косовске Митровице. Анализом албанојезичке ходонимије у јужном и српскојезичке ходонимије у северном делу града сагледавају се разлике на нивоу културних и друштвених приоритета житеља с једне и друге стране Ибра, начин и степен потирања старог и успостављања новог идентитета града, улога и значај ходонима у обликовању културе сећања, јавног мишљења и вредносног система друштва. Утврђује се да албанојезичке, као и српскојезичке ходониме карактеришу они меморативног типа, да у оквиру албанојезичких меморатива примарно место заузимају имена учесника побуна и ратова, док међу српским меморативима то место припада људима из области културе, да, иако вишеструко мањи у односу на албанојезички, српскојезички корпус ходонима одликује донекле већа мотивска разноврсност, као и да је актуелна политизација далеко израженија у албанојезичкој неголи српскојезичкој ходонимији., В статье на материале албаноязычной годонимии в южной части и сербоязычной годонимии в северной части Косовской Митровицы рассматриваются актуальная идейно-политическая ориентация, различия в сфере культурных и общественных приоритетов жителей по ту и другую стороны реки Ибар, степень и способы стирания старой и становления новой идентичности города. Утверждается, что годонимы, кроме всего прочего, играют важную роль в формировании общественного мнения и ценностной ориентации населения. Анализ показал, что албаноязычную, так же, как и сербоязычную годонимии характеризуют годонимы меморативного типа; среди албаноязычных меморативов ведущее место занимают имена участников бунтов и войн, в то время как среди сербских годонимов это место принадлежит деятелям культуры; несмотря на значительно меньшее количество примеров относительно албаноязычного корпуса, сербоязычный корпус годонимов отличается большим разнообразием мотивирующих основ., This paper, based on the analysis of Albanian odonyms in the southern part of Kosovska Mitrovica and Serbian odonyms in the northern part of Kosovska Mitrovica, examines the current ideological and political orientations, differences in regard to cultural and social priorities of residents living on both sides of the Ibar River, as well as the manner and extent of abolishing the old and establishing the new town identity. It is established that odonyms, among other things, play an important role in shaping the public opinion and value system of the population. The research has shown that both Albanian and Serbian odonyms are of the commemorative type, and that Albanian commemorative odonyms primarily consist of names of war and rebellion participants, whereas Serbian commemorative odonyms are devoted to cultural dignitaries. Furthermore, although Albanian odonyms considerably outnumber the Serbian odonym corpus, the latter is characterised by a greater variety of motifs.

In the context of multiculturalism, the processes of seeking and creating of collective identity of the local community are quite specifi c. In these processes, it is the collective memory that plays a major role as a deciding and organizing factor of the integration of the community at all levels. A town unique – Borne Sulinowo – has existed within the state borders for only 21 years now. In the past, it was a military base of for the Third Reich, and aft er the World War II, it served as a military base for Soviet Army. Th e community of Borne Sulinowo is still in the process of seeking of its identity and its place in history. In 1993, when the town was created and organized, the prospective citizens came from 36 regions of Poland. Th e interesting process of entering of incoming people into the new achitectural and cultural space, the space which never belonged to the cultural heritage of Poland, has begun. People from diff erent backgrounds, diff erentiated in view of the place where they came from, in view of age, profession, education and life experience, were trying to accustom the new space. Th e process of shaping the local community in Borne Sulinowo is still in progress and has not fi nished yet. One of the major factor that infl uence the above mentioned process is the collective memory of particular groups of people, such as the groups from Upper and Lower Silesia or Western Pomerania.

Last Autumn has been launched in Osnabrück a new graduate school, in cooperation with the Herzog August Bibliothek in Wolfenbüttel, entirely devoted to the history of early modern libraries. For the next three years a group of 12 graduate students will work on their own projects, using the rich collection from Wolfenbüttel and benefiting from the expertise of scholars working in the library and engaged since many years in the promotion of the rich heritage of the collection. The graduate program is financed by the Ministery for research and culture of the region Niedersachsen. In order to understand how the project was conceived, what ideas underpin its creation, and what are the biographies and expectations of single students, Paola Molino (member of the editorial board of «Bibliothecae.it») has interviewed the coordinator of the program, Prof. Wolfgang Adam, specialist on early modern German literature, and a group of students.

In the context of multiculturalism, the processes of seeking and creating of collective identity of the local community are quite specifi c. In these processes, it is the collective memory that plays a major role as a deciding and organizing factor of the integration of the community at all levels. A town unique – Borne Sulinowo – has existed within the state borders for only 21 years now. In the past, it was a military base of for the Third Reich, and aft er the World War II, it served as a military base for Soviet Army. Th e community of Borne Sulinowo is still in the process of seeking of its identity and its place in history. In 1993, when the town was created and organized, the prospective citizens came from 36 regions of Poland. Th e interesting process of entering of incoming people into the new achitectural and cultural space, the space which never belonged to the cultural heritage of Poland, has begun. People from diff erent backgrounds, diff erentiated in view of the place where they came from, in view of age, profession, education and life experience, were trying to accustom the new space. Th e process of shaping the local community in Borne Sulinowo is still in progress and has not fi nished yet. One of the major factor that infl uence the above mentioned process is the collective memory of particular groups of people, such as the groups from Upper and Lower Silesia or Western Pomerania.

Arheologija sećanja, predstavlja prvu celovitu studiju o problemu spomenika kao mestu izgradnje i razgradnje spomeničke kulture koja kroz konzistentan i samorefleksivan teorijski fokus postavlja i rešava mnoga važna pitanja iz nekoliko naučnih disciplina, kao što su društvena istorija, kultura sećanja i istorija arhitekture i umetnosti. Međutim, arheologija sećanja posve je simptomatična za teorijski pristup i interpretativni postupak koji predstavlja mnogo više od prigodno sročene i zvučne fraze. Ako je arheologija naučno proučavanje aktivnosti čoveka u prošlosti kroz studiju njegovih artefakata, odnosno materijalne kulture, onda "arheologija sećanja" govori o jednom, esencijalno važnom aspektu u životu ljudi i zajednica koji obično izmiče standardnom fokusu usmerenom na artefakte prošlosti.

One of the most common forms of public monument in the nineteenth-century Serbian memorial culture was the memorial tomb. Marking the graves of prominent people is one of the oldest forms of memorialization. In the nineteenth century, memorial tombs were erected on sacred ground, something that was made possible by the fact that the church in Serbia was not only a religious institution but a national, public one as well. In the nineteenth-century culture of remembrance, memorial tombs placed in sacred spaces were erected for wa heroes, and heroes of cultural, political and religious life. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the graves of prominent members of the nation were, according to the national ideology, promoted into public national monuments and thus functioned as an important place of remembrance and active agents in the construction of national identity. During the second half of the nineteenth century, the strengthening of nationalism raised the need for the erection of national monuments. This led to the adoption of contemporary European monument forms, which could be found among numerous examples of memorial tombs erected in sacred spaces during the nineteenth century. The aim of this paper is to give a survey of public monuments in sacred spaces in nineteenth-century Serbia, to analyse the reasons for the erection of national monuments in sacred spaces, and to consider their place within that space, as well as differentiating the practices of their erection.

The process of establishing a common Yugoslav identity saw the development of cultural cooperation between Serbia and Slovenia. The foundations of Serbo-Slovenian cultural and political cooperation were based on the historic association between Vuk Stefanoviæ Karadžiæ and Jernej Kopitar. This led to the organization of a joint funeral spectacle, which saw the transfer of their bodies from Vienna to Belgrade and Ljubljana in 1897. The significance of the repatriation of Kopitar and Vuk Karadžiæ's remains from Vienna to Ljubljana and Belgrade is multifold. This event represents the first joint Serbian-Slovenian public political action, which also constructed a common South Slavic-Yugoslav identity. On the other hand, the repatriation of Kopitar and Vuk Karadžiæ's remains shows and confirms the connection between funerary culture and public monuments.

This article discusses the relationship between the current sense of post-conflict in Colombia and a number of cultural and political initiatives that are committed to the construction of collective memory from the perspective of violence and minorities. To address the analysis it uses theoretical discussion around the notion of post-conflict, as well as empirical observation of some of the political and legal processes, and descriptive analysis on the cultural spaces that relate to this context, Este artículo aborda la relación entre la actual sensación de posconflicto que atraviesa Colombia y una serie de iniciativas culturales y políticas que apuestan por la construcción de la memoria colectiva desde las perspectivas de la violencia y las minorías. Para desarrollar el análisis se combinan las discusiones teóricas alrededor de la noción de posconflicto con la observación empírica de algunos de sus procesos políticos y legales, y la descripción y reflexión sobre los espacios culturales que se relacionan con este contexto

The process of establishing a common Yugoslav identity saw the development of cultural cooperation between Serbia and Slovenia. The foundations of Serbo-Slovenian cultural and political cooperation were based on the historic association between Vuk Stefanoviæ Karadžiæ and Jernej Kopitar. This led to the organization of a joint funeral spectacle, which saw the transfer of their bodies from Vienna to Belgrade and Ljubljana in 1897. The significance of the repatriation of Kopitar and Vuk Karadžiæ's remains from Vienna to Ljubljana and Belgrade is multifold. This event represents the first joint Serbian-Slovenian public political action, which also constructed a common South Slavic-Yugoslav identity. On the other hand, the repatriation of Kopitar and Vuk Karadžiæ's remains shows and confirms the connection between funerary culture and public monuments.

One of the most common forms of public monument in the nineteenth-century Serbian memorial culture was the memorial tomb. Marking the graves of prominent people is one of the oldest forms of memorialization. In the nineteenth century, memorial tombs were erected on sacred ground, something that was made possible by the fact that the church in Serbia was not only a religious institution but a national, public one as well. In the nineteenth-century culture of remembrance, memorial tombs placed in sacred spaces were erected for wa heroes, and heroes of cultural, political and religious life. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the graves of prominent members of the nation were, according to the national ideology, promoted into public national monuments and thus functioned as an important place of remembrance and active agents in the construction of national identity. During the second half of the nineteenth century, the strengthening of nationalism raised the need for the erection of national monuments. This led to the adoption of contemporary European monument forms, which could be found among numerous examples of memorial tombs erected in sacred spaces during the nineteenth century. The aim of this paper is to give a survey of public monuments in sacred spaces in nineteenth-century Serbia, to analyse the reasons for the erection of national monuments in sacred spaces, and to consider their place within that space, as well as differentiating the practices of their erection.

Kompleks Starog sajmišta jedno je od centralnih mesta sećanja u Beogradu. Izgradjen kao "sajam uzoraka" od strane eminentnih arhitekata Beogradske opoštine 1937. godine, ovaj prostor je funkcionisao kao koncentracioni logor u vreme Drugog svetskog rata, te kao sedište umetničkih ateljea u vreme socijalističke Jugoslavije. Danas je prostor Starog sajmišta sasvim marginalizovan, naseljen ljudima s margine društva – siromašnim stanovništvom koje je, poput nekadašnjih zatočenika koncentracionog logora, postalo sasvim nevidljivo. Zbog opšte zapuštenosi i potrebe da se i taj deo integriše u urbani prostor grada, Skupština grada Beograda usvojila je još 1992. godine Detaljni urbanistički plan spomeničkog kompleksa kojim se “postiže vraćanje celovitog izgleda prostoru Starog beogradskog sajmišta, kakav je bio u momentu pretvaranja u logor i istovremeno pruža mogućnost da se kompleks obnovi i u funkciji sajma uzoraka”. Tako ambivalentna formulacija, u kojoj se zapravo ne može razlučiti šta je prioritet rekonstrukcije u pogledu vrednosti, ponovljena je u Generalnom urbanističkom planu Beograda 2021, koji je Skupština grada Beograda usvojila u septembru 2003. godine. Sudeći po sve glasnijim zahtevima da se ovaj prostor obnovi kao mesto sećanja na žrtve Drugog svetskog rata i, posebno, na hiljade Beograđana koji su u njemu stradali samo zbog toga što im je identitet bio nepodban, prilika da se sloboda sećanja na holokaust i pravo na njegovo javno prikazivanje u Srbiji konačno ostvari sve je izvesnija.

Memories of the WWII are crucial to process of forging Serbian national identity. Respectable parts of this process are places of commemoration of the WWII. These are essential not only for constructing and transforming advisable forms of memorialization, but also for constructing value systems, which govern Serbian society. Belgrade topography is distinguished by several important interconnected places that stand as War memorials. Their interconnected relations reflect complex and symptomatic attitudes toward victims of the War, at the same time being witness of eligible system of national, social and moral standards. Case study of the Staro sajmište (the Old Fairground) in Belgrade is rather illustrative, for social semiotics of the place ― which used to be a Jewish concentration camp ― was generally based on certain, but profoundly tendentious system of both remembrance and oblivion, and of substitution of memory. Seen in comparative perspective with central commemorative places ― and that is, surely, the Memorial of Jajinci ― the places that memorialize Jewish victims of WWII (the Old Fairground, Sephardic Synagogue in Dorćol, Memorials in the Jewish Cemetery and in Topovske Šupe) testify to rigidity of consciously exclusive and totalitarian concept of collective identity. More to the point, recent psychical interventions that took place on these diverse places of memory, different layouts that have predetermined courses of events and functions of these memorials, along with constantly changing interpretation of the meaning of these memorials have one thing in common. These reveal a fact that changeable spatialization of memory of WWII is fundamental not only to unstable and shifting relationships toward recent past, but also to process of creating and stabilizing the borders of collective identities in Serbia., Sećanje na Drugi svetski rat predstavlja jednu od najvažnijih instanci u procesu generisanja sadržaja srpskog nacionalnog identiteta. Važan deo toga procesa jesu prostori komemoracije žrtava Drugog svetskog rata, mesta putem kojih su konstruisani i transformisani ne samo poželjni oblici sećanja, već i izgrđivani dominantni sistemi vrednosti unutar srpskog društva. U topografiji Beograda posebno se izdvaja nekoliko ključnih mesta sećanja na Drugi svetski rat koje je važno dovesti u međusobnu vezu. Njihove relacije dobro odslikavaju složenu i simptomatičnu prirodu odnosa prema problemu žrtava rata, ali i prema prihvatljivom sistemu nacionalnih, društvenih i moralnih standarda. Primer Starog sajmišta u Beogradu veoma je ilustrativan, budući da je značenje toga mesta ― nekadašnjeg koncentracionog logora za Jevreje ― u javnom prostoru mahom bilo zasnovano na kompleksnom sistemu sećanja, zaboravljanja i supstituisanja memorije. Staro sajmište, kao i drugi prostori sećanja na Drugi svetski rat koji se dovode u vezu sa jevrejskim žrtvama (Sefardska sinagoga na Dorćolu, Spomenik jevrejskim žrtvama fašizma na Jevrejskom groblju i Memorijal Topovske šupe), posmatrani u perspektivi odnosa prema drugim, centralnim mestima sećanja na rat (pre svega Spomen-parkom Jajinci), svedoče o rigidnom, tendenciozno isključivom i totalizujućem konceptu društvenog identiteta. Štaviše, savremene intervencije u fizičkoj strukturi i funkciji ovih memorijala, različiti planovi koji su odredili njihovu dalju sudbinu, kao i promena interpretacije njihove sadržine jasan su pokazatelj da je transformacija uprostoravanja sećanja na Drugi svetski rat temeljno značajan aspekt ne samo promenljivog i nestabilnog odnosa prema recentnoj prošlosti, već i procesa opcrtavanja granica kolektivnih identiteta u Srbiji.

Indledning til antologi om fortidspolitik og erindringskulturer i Tyskland og Skandinavien

Antologi omhandlende erindringskultur og fortidspolitik i tyskland og Skandinavien efter 1945.

Udgivelsesdato: forår

Indledning til antologi om fortidspolitik og erindringskulturer i Tyskland og Skandinavien

Antologi omhandlende erindringskultur og fortidspolitik i tyskland og Skandinavien efter 1945.

Udgivelsesdato: forår

Englandskrigene kickstartede dansk nationalisme, men det var ikke fjendskabet med England, der dannede det danske Danmarksbillede, det var derimod den nye arvefjende Tyskland. At et jubilæum som 200-året for 1807 kan festligholdes som i dag er et tegn på, at forsoning er mulig.

Kommentar til den diplomatiske krise mellem Italien og Kroatien i februar 2007 omkring erindringen af henholdsvis italienske og kroatiske krigsforbrydelser under anden verdenskrig. Krisen bruges som et eksempel på, at gamle medlemslande i EU stiller større krav om til erindringskulturen i ansøgerlandene, end de gør til sig selv.

Kommentar til den diplomatiske krise mellem Italien og Kroatien i februar 2007 omkring erindringen af henholdsvis italienske og kroatiske krigsforbrydelser under anden verdenskrig. Krisen bruges som et eksempel på, at gamle medlemslande i EU stiller større krav om til erindringskulturen i ansøgerlandene, end de gør til sig selv.

Englandskrigene kickstartede dansk nationalisme, men det var ikke fjendskabet med England, der dannede det danske Danmarksbillede, det var derimod den nye arvefjende Tyskland. At et jubilæum som 200-året for 1807 kan festligholdes som i dag er et tegn på, at forsoning er mulig.