Search

Introduction: in hospitals across Africa, the case fatality rates of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) have remained consistently high (over 20%), despite the existence of the WHO treatment guideline. This has been attributed to inconsistencies in the implementation of the WHO treatment guidelines in sub-Saharan African countries. In spite of this awareness, the SAM treatment guidelines adopted by various sub-Saharan African countries and hospitals are unknown. Knowledge of the exact treatment practices employed in the management of SAM in different hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa is not known. This study aims to investigate the admission criteria, in-patient treatment guidelines and practices and outcomes of complicated SAM in sub-Saharan African children aged 0-59 months. Methods: this is an observational study which involves the extraction of admission, treatment and discharge data from the medical records of infants and children aged 0-59 months diagnosed and treated for complicated SAM in sub-Saharan Africa. This information is being used to develop a comprehensive database on the treatment of complicated SAM across sub-Saharan Africa. Information on the national and hospital guidelines for the treatment of complicated SAM is also collected. Results: results of this study will serve as a useful resource on the true reflection of the treatment of complicated SAM across sub-Saharan Africa and will provide valuable information for optimising SAM treatment. Conclusion: in order to advocate best practice and reduce SAM-related mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, the identification of the different diagnostic and treatment methods and respective outcomes across different hospitals and countries is imperative

Introduction: in hospitals across Africa, the case fatality rates of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) have remained consistently high (over 20%), despite the existence of the WHO treatment guideline. This has been attributed to inconsistencies in the implementation of the WHO treatment guidelines in sub-Saharan African countries. In spite of this awareness, the SAM treatment guidelines adopted by various sub-Saharan African countries and hospitals are unknown. Knowledge of the exact treatment practices employed in the management of SAM in different hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa is not known. This study aims to investigate the admission criteria, in-patient treatment guidelines and practices and outcomes of complicated SAM in sub-Saharan African children aged 0-59 months. Methods: this is an observational study which involves the extraction of admission, treatment and discharge data from the medical records of infants and children aged 0-59 months diagnosed and treated for complicated SAM in sub-Saharan Africa. This information is being used to develop a comprehensive database on the treatment of complicated SAM across sub-Saharan Africa. Information on the national and hospital guidelines for the treatment of complicated SAM is also collected. Results: results of this study will serve as a useful resource on the true reflection of the treatment of complicated SAM across sub-Saharan Africa and will provide valuable information for optimising SAM treatment. Conclusion: in order to advocate best practice and reduce SAM-related mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, the identification of the different diagnostic and treatment methods and respective outcomes across different hospitals and countries is imperative

Background: Uterine prolapse (UP) is a main contributor to reproductive health problems that influence women’s quality of life. In Nepal, the UP prevalence ranges from 7-27%. Women experience various difficulties and symptoms due to UP, which are determined by the type as well as thestage of UP. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the knowledge, prevalence and treatment practices of uterine prolapse among women of reproductive age in the peri-urban Jhaukhel-Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site (JD-HDSS) in the Bhaktapur district of Nepal. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data in two stages. A structured survey of 3,124 households in JD-HDSS, incorporating 60% of all women of reproductive age, assessed knowledge of uterine prolapse and identified self-reported disease prevalence (symptomatic). Next, we organised a five day clinical screening camp at JD-HDSS to identify the prevalence of uterine prolapse in attendees. The household survey was conducted on September-December 2012 and the UP screening camp on May-June 2013. Descriptive statistics was used to analyse the proportion of comprehensive knowledge regarding UP and the prevalence of UP. Results: Ninety-three percent of women in JD-HDSS had heard of uterine prolapse and 55% of those had comprehensive knowledge. Self-reported (symptomatic) prevalence was 2.11% (8.5% including women who had undergone hysterectomy for uterine prolapse). Among these, 52.6% had received no treatment. The most common reported treatments of uterine prolapse included surgery (53.2%), exercise and medicine (35.5%) and pessary (11.3%). Among women attending the outreach camp (N=303), UP prevalence was 15.18%. Conclusion: Knowledge of uterine prolapse among women in JD-HDSS is almost double that reported in a national survey. Similarly, the prevalence of self-reported uterine prolapse in JD-HDSS is almost three fold less than the national prevalence. Knowledge, early healthcare practices and availability of surgica