1. JWST detection of a supernova associated with GRB 221009A without an r-process signature.
- Author
-
Blanchard, Peter, Blanchard, Peter, Villar, V, Chornock, Ryan, Laskar, Tanmoy, Li, Yijia, Leja, Joel, Pierel, Justin, Berger, Edo, Margutti, Raffaella, Alexander, Kate, Barnes, Jennifer, Cendes, Yvette, Eftekhari, Tarraneh, Kasen, Daniel, LeBaron, Natalie, Metzger, Brian, Muzerolle Page, James, Rest, Armin, Sears, Huei, Siegel, Daniel, Yadavalli, S, Blanchard, Peter, Blanchard, Peter, Villar, V, Chornock, Ryan, Laskar, Tanmoy, Li, Yijia, Leja, Joel, Pierel, Justin, Berger, Edo, Margutti, Raffaella, Alexander, Kate, Barnes, Jennifer, Cendes, Yvette, Eftekhari, Tarraneh, Kasen, Daniel, LeBaron, Natalie, Metzger, Brian, Muzerolle Page, James, Rest, Armin, Sears, Huei, Siegel, Daniel, and Yadavalli, S
- Abstract
Identifying the sites of r-process nucleosynthesis, a primary mechanism of heavy element production, is a key goal of astrophysics. The discovery of the brightest gamma-ray burst (GRB) to date, GRB 221009A, presented an opportunity to spectroscopically test the idea that r-process elements are produced following the collapse of rapidly rotating massive stars. Here we present James Webb Space Telescope observations of GRB 221009A obtained +168 and +170 rest-frame days after the gamma-ray trigger, and demonstrate that they are well described by a SN 1998bw-like supernova (SN) and power-law afterglow, with no evidence for a component from r-process emission. The SN, with a nickel mass of approximately 0.09 M ⊙, is only slightly fainter than the brightness of SN 1998bw at this phase, which indicates that the SN is not an unusual GRB-SN. This demonstrates that the GRB and SN mechanisms are decoupled and that highly energetic GRBs are not likely to produce significant quantities of r-process material, which leaves open the question of whether explosions of massive stars are key sources of r-process elements. Moreover, the host galaxy of GRB 221009A has a very low metallicity of approximately 0.12 Z ⊙ and strong H2 emission at the explosion site, which is consistent with recent star formation, hinting that environmental factors are responsible for its extreme energetics.
- Published
- 2024