Search

The occurrence of recalls involving pathogenic Escherichia coli-contaminated wheat flours show the need for incorporating antimicrobial interventions in wheat milling. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of sodium bisulfate (SBS) tempering in reducing E. coli O121 (ATCC 2219) and O26 (ATCC 2196) wheat load and to evaluate the impact of effective (≥3.0 log reductions) SBS treatments on wheat flour quality. Wheat grains were inoculated with E. coli (~6 log CFU/g) and tempered (17% moisture, 24 h) using the following SBS concentrations (%wheat basis): 0, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.5% SBS. Reductions in E. coli O121 and O26 wheat load at different time intervals (0.5, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) during tempering were evaluated. The addition of SBS during tempering resulted in E. coli (O121 and O26) log reductions of 2.0 (0.5% SBS) to >4.0 logs (1.5% SBS) (p ≤ 0.05). SBS tempering (1.25 and 1.5% SBS) produced acidic wheat flours (pH = 4.51–4.60) but had comparable wheat flour properties in terms of composition, dough, and bread-making properties relative to the control (0% SBS). SBS tempering reduced the E. coli O121 and O26 load of wheat after tempering with minimal effects on wheat flour quality.

The occurrence of recalls involving pathogenic Escherichia coli-contaminated wheat flours show the need for incorporating antimicrobial interventions in wheat milling. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of sodium bisulfate (SBS) tempering in reducing E. coli O121 (ATCC 2219) and O26 (ATCC 2196) wheat load and to evaluate the impact of effective (≥3.0 log reductions) SBS treatments on wheat flour quality. Wheat grains were inoculated with E. coli (~6 log CFU/g) and tempered (17% moisture, 24 h) using the following SBS concentrations (%wheat basis): 0, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.5% SBS. Reductions in E. coli O121 and O26 wheat load at different time intervals (0.5, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) during tempering were evaluated. The addition of SBS during tempering resulted in E. coli (O121 and O26) log reductions of 2.0 (0.5% SBS) to >4.0 logs (1.5% SBS) (p ≤ 0.05). SBS tempering (1.25 and 1.5% SBS) produced acidic wheat flours (pH = 4.51–4.60) but had comparable wheat flour properties in terms of composition, dough, and bread-making properties relative to the control (0% SBS). SBS tempering reduced the E. coli O121 and O26 load of wheat after tempering with minimal effects on wheat flour quality.

Ammonia (NH₃) emissions from animal manure, such as poultry litter, can cause air quality problems. These emissions also result in excessive nitrogen (N) loading into aquatic environments which can lead to water quality problems where N is the limiting nutrient for eutrophication, such as the Chesapeake Bay. Poultry litter treatment (PLT, sodium bisulfate) is an acidic amendment that is applied to litter in poultry houses to decrease NH3 emissions, but currently it can only be applied before birds are placed in the houses. This project analyzed the effect of multiple PLT applications on litter properties and NH₃ release in a controlled and field environment. Volatility chambers with acid traps were used to compare multiple, single, and no applications of PLT to poultry litter. Both single and reapplied PLT caused a greater moisture content and lower pH in litter. Additionally, the E.coli in litter was decreased significantly with both single and reapplied PLT. After 15 days, NH₃ released from litter treated with reapplied PLT was significantly less than litter with both single and no applications. Furthermore, NH₄⁺-N content of litter was greatest in litter treated with reapplied PLT increasing its fertilizer value. The efficacy of a new farm scale system capable of applying several additions of PLT to poultry litter throughout the growth of a flock was also evaluated. Though litter pH, E.coli, and NH₃ volatilization were temporarily decreased with PLT application, the overhead reapplication auger system is not recommended at this time due to moisture and corrosion problems.

Ammonia (NH₃) emissions from animal manure, such as poultry litter, can cause air quality problems. These emissions also result in excessive nitrogen (N) loading into aquatic environments which can lead to water quality problems where N is the limiting nutrient for eutrophication, such as the Chesapeake Bay. Poultry litter treatment (PLT, sodium bisulfate) is an acidic amendment that is applied to litter in poultry houses to decrease NH3 emissions, but currently it can only be applied before birds are placed in the houses. This project analyzed the effect of multiple PLT applications on litter properties and NH₃ release in a controlled and field environment. Volatility chambers with acid traps were used to compare multiple, single, and no applications of PLT to poultry litter. Both single and reapplied PLT caused a greater moisture content and lower pH in litter. Additionally, the E.coli in litter was decreased significantly with both single and reapplied PLT. After 15 days, NH₃ released from litter treated with reapplied PLT was significantly less than litter with both single and no applications. Furthermore, NH₄⁺-N content of litter was greatest in litter treated with reapplied PLT increasing its fertilizer value. The efficacy of a new farm scale system capable of applying several additions of PLT to poultry litter throughout the growth of a flock was also evaluated. Though litter pH, E.coli, and NH₃ volatilization were temporarily decreased with PLT application, the overhead reapplication auger system is not recommended at this time due to moisture and corrosion problems.

Sodium bisulfate (NaHSO4) was evaluated as a means of chemically preserving soil samples to prevent the microbiological degradation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Laboratory sample treatment consisted of spiking soil samples held in glass ampoules with aqueous solutions containing eight different VOCs or gasoline and then sealing them to eliminate volatilization as a concern. Samples preserved with NaHSO4 were held at room temperature (22 deg C), while equal numbers of unpreserved samples were stored refrigerated (4 deg C) and at room temperature. Results show that concentrations of all of the halogenated hydrocarbons tested (14) remain fairly constant, independent of temperature or preservation. In contrast, all the aromatic hydrocarbons (10) tested as separate analytes, or ones that could easily be identified in gasoline, experienced a complete (>95%) loss when held for nine days at room temperature. Refrigeration reduced the rate of biodegradation, but two aromatic hydrocarbons showed substantial losses (>80%) within the currently recommended 14-day holding period. Over a 28-day refrigerated period, reductions of greater than 95% occurred for 9 of 10 aromatic hydrocarbons tested. With the exception of styrene, chemical preservation by introducing NaHSO4 mitigated the loss of all of aromatic hydrocarbons tested over a 28-day holding period when samples were stored at room temperature. Therefore, NaHSO4 preservation is one way of effectively eliminating biodegradation of VOCs in soil samples intended for low level (<1-micro g/g) analysis. jg

The purpose of this work was to establish the stability of volatile organic compounds in environmental water samples. The stability of common volatile organic compounds was determined in three types of waters, distilled water, a groundwater, and a surface water. Two concentration levels were studied: nominally 50 micron/L and 500 micron/L. Samples were stored at two conditions, room temperature and under refrigeration (4C). Samples were analyzed at intervals of 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, 112, and 365 days. The data from this study indicates that most volatile organic compounds are stable in water for longer than 365 days. Exceptions to this statement include compounds prone to dehydrohalogenation (e.g. 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane) and compounds prone to biological degradation, particularly the volatile aromatics. The stability of the compounds was matrix dependent and storage condition dependent. Within the limits of this study, the minimum holding time for an environmental water sample prior to analysis for volatile organic compounds is about ten days, although for most of the compounds, stability is not a problem up to 365 days.