1. Enhancing home health mobile phone app usability through general smartphone training: usability and learnability case study.
- Author
-
ERC, Harte, Richard P., Hall, Tony, Glynn, Liam G., Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro, Scharf, Thomas, Quinlan, Leo R., ÓLaighin, Gearóid, ERC, Harte, Richard P., Hall, Tony, Glynn, Liam G., Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro, Scharf, Thomas, Quinlan, Leo R., and ÓLaighin, Gearóid
- Abstract
peer-reviewed, Each year, millions of older adults fall, with more than 1 out of 4 older people experiencing a fall annually, thereby causing a major social and economic impact. Falling once doubles oneâ s chances of falling again, making fall prediction an important aspect of preventative strategies. In this study, 22 older adults aged between 65 and 85 years were trained in the use of a smartphone-based fall prediction system. The system is designed to continuously assess fall risk by measuring various gait and balance parameters using a smart insole and smartphone, and is also designed to detect falls. The use case of the fall prediction system in question required the users to interact with the smartphone via an app for device syncing, data uploads, and checking system status. The objective of this study was to observe the effect that basic smartphone training could have on the user experience of a group that is not technically proficient with smartphones when using a new connected health system. It was expected that even short rudimentary training could have a large effect on user experience and therefore increase the chances of the group accepting the new technology. All participants received training on how to use the system smartphone app; half of the participants (training group) also received extra training on how to use basic functions of the smartphone, such as making calls and sending text messages, whereas the other half did not receive this extra training (no extra training group). Comparison of training group and no extra training group was carried out using metrics such as satisfaction rating, time taken to complete tasks, cues required to complete tasks, and errors made during tasks. The training group fared better in the first 3 days of using the system. There were significant recorded differences in number of cues required and errors committed between the two groups. By the fourth and fifth day of use, both groups were performing at the same level when using th, PUBLISHED, peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2020