1. Patient Compliance in Assessing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Urologic Surgery
- Author
-
Gruene, Britta, Menold, Hanna, Lenhart, Maximilian, Muehlbauer, Julia, Walach, Margarete T., Waldbillig, Frank, Neuberger, Manuel, Nuhn, Philipp, Michel, Maurice S., Koenig, Julian, Kriegmair, Maximilian C., Wessels, Frederik, Gruene, Britta, Menold, Hanna, Lenhart, Maximilian, Muehlbauer, Julia, Walach, Margarete T., Waldbillig, Frank, Neuberger, Manuel, Nuhn, Philipp, Michel, Maurice S., Koenig, Julian, Kriegmair, Maximilian C., and Wessels, Frederik
- Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to assess patient compliance with a newly established electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system after urologic surgery and to identify influencing factors. Methods: Digital surveys were provided to patients undergoing cystectomy, radical or partial nephrectomy, or transurethral resection of bladder tumor via a newly established ePROM system. Participants received a baseline survey preoperatively and several follow-up surveys postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting compliance. Results: Of N = 435 eligible patients, n = 338 completed the baseline survey (78.0%). Patients who did not participate were significantly more likely male (p = 0.004) and older than 70 years (p = 0.005). Overall, 206/337 patients (61.3%) completed the survey at 1-month, 167/312 (53.5%) at 3-month, and 142/276 (51.4%) at 6-month follow-up. Lower baseline quality of life (odds ratio: 2.27; p = 0.004) was a significant predictor for dropout at 1-month follow-up. Low educational level was significantly associated with low compliance at 3- (OR: 1.92; p = 0.01) and 6-month follow-up (OR: 2.88; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Acceptable compliance rates can be achieved with ePROMs following urologic surgery. Several factors influence compliance and should be considered when setting-up ePROM surveys.
- Published
- 2023