1. Safety and efficacy of givinostat in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (EPIDYS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
- Author
-
Mercuri, Eugenio Maria, Vilchez, Juan J, Boespflug-Tanguy, Odile, Zaidman, Craig M, Mah, Jean K, Goemans, Nathalie, Müller-Felber, Wolfgang, Niks, Erik H, Schara-Schmidt, Ulrike, Bertini, Enrico, Comi, Giacomo P, Mathews, Katherine D, Servais, Laurent, Vandenborne, Krista, Johannsen, Jessika, Messina, Sonia, Spinty, Stefan, Mcadam, Laura, Selby, Kathryn, Byrne, Barry, Laverty, Chamindra G, Carroll, Kevin, Zardi, Giulia, Cazzaniga, Sara, Coceani, Nicoletta, Bettica, Paolo, Mcdonald, Craig M, Mercuri, Eugenio (ORCID:0000-0002-9851-5365), Mercuri, Eugenio Maria, Vilchez, Juan J, Boespflug-Tanguy, Odile, Zaidman, Craig M, Mah, Jean K, Goemans, Nathalie, Müller-Felber, Wolfgang, Niks, Erik H, Schara-Schmidt, Ulrike, Bertini, Enrico, Comi, Giacomo P, Mathews, Katherine D, Servais, Laurent, Vandenborne, Krista, Johannsen, Jessika, Messina, Sonia, Spinty, Stefan, Mcadam, Laura, Selby, Kathryn, Byrne, Barry, Laverty, Chamindra G, Carroll, Kevin, Zardi, Giulia, Cazzaniga, Sara, Coceani, Nicoletta, Bettica, Paolo, Mcdonald, Craig M, and Mercuri, Eugenio (ORCID:0000-0002-9851-5365)
- Abstract
Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the most common childhood muscular dystrophy, is caused by dystrophin deficiency. Preclinical and phase 2 study data have suggested that givinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, might help to counteract the effects of this deficiency. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of givinostat in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Methods: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 41 tertiary care sites in 11 countries. Eligible participants were ambulant, male, and aged at least 6 years, had a genetically confirmed diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, completed two four-stair climb assessments with a mean of 8 s or less (≤1 s variance), had a time-to-rise of at least 3 s but less than 10 s, and had received systemic corticosteroids for at least 6 months. Participating boys were randomly assigned (2:1, allocated according to a list generated by the interactive response technology provider) to receive either oral givinostat or matching placebo twice a day for 72 weeks, stratified by concomitant steroid use. Boys, investigators, and site and sponsor staff were masked to treatment assignment. The dose was flexible, based on weight, and was reduced if not tolerated. Boys were divided into two groups on the basis of their baseline vastus lateralis fat fraction (VLFF; measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy): group A comprised boys with a VLFF of more than 5% but no more than 30%, whereas group B comprised boys with a VLFF of 5% or less, or more than 30%. The primary endpoint compared the effects of givinostat and placebo on the change in results of the four-stair climb assessment between baseline and 72 weeks, in the intention-to-treat, group A population. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned boys who received at least one dose of study drug. When the first 50 boys in group A completed 12 months of treatment, an interim futility assessment was conducted
- Published
- 2024