Search

Nexus research can help address issues arising at the intersection of traditionally independently treated management, policy, and research areas. While an extensive body of literature and reviews have been published on the water, food and energy nexus, biodiversity is less commonly featured in food and water nexus research, particularly in India. India hosts a large proportion of the world’s biological diversity. At the same time, it is facing one of the world's highest habitat conversion rates, among others for agricultural production, as well as increasing water scarcity. Hence, the integration of biodiversity considerations into food and water nexus management and governance decisions is particularly critical in India. Here, we explore linkages at the food, water and biodiversity (FWB) nexus in India using a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature. A total of 208 nexus linkages were extracted from 55 articles and mapped using a qualitative systems mapping approach. Results show a strong interdependence between all three nexus nodes, with biodiversity exhibiting the highest number of linkages across the system (137 linkages), followed by water (131 linkages) and food (120 linkages). Our results reflect the state-of-the-art of research on biodiversity at the food-water nexus in India and highlight the importance of better understanding the linkages and tradeoffs at India's FWB nexus.

Effective conservation and restoration actions, if carefully and strategically implemented, can help to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Yet, conflicting societal objectives and climate change can constraint such actions, and there is a need for context-specific and integrated solutions that work for biodiversity and people. We investigate conservation and restoration options within the Neusiedl lake and surrounding cross-border region, situated in Austria and Hungary. This region contains the largest central-European endorheic lake, rare ecosystems such as steppe salt ponds and provides a habitat for many species. Critically it is cultural landscape with a complex governance system and the competing demands give rise to a series of land-use and resource conflicts with biodiversity. We apply a systematic conservation planning framework customized for cross-realm and integrated conservation problems. It is integrated as it critically considers not only biodiversity, but also other perspectives towards sustainable land and water management discussed together with stakeholders in the region. Further a range of state-of-the-art remote sensing, machine learning, socio-ecological valuation techniques will be applied to identify where and how biodiversity can be preserved. Our holistic framework has the potential to provide actionable insights for stakeholders and entry points towards implementing nature-positive policies.

Climate change interacts with a multitude of socioeconomic characteristics (i.e. income, age, employment), determining individual risk and coping capacities. However, existing impact assessments of climate risk commonly focus on aggregate levels, leaving blind spots with respect to within-country distributional effects. Adhering to the concept of intersectionality, this study examines differential vulnerabilities and factors determining heterogeneities on a household level in the context of heat and flood related risks in Austria. We extend upon previous research by identifying differential vulnerabilities and the patterns determining heterogeneities among agents. To this end, we develop a mixed-methods approach, bringing together two ends of the spectrum: the generic representation of a single representative household and highly context specific individual risk determinants. Building on the engagement with stakeholders at different governance levels, qualitative insights from workshops and interviews are developed into narratives and storylines. These are vital for identifying key drivers of vulnerability and later integrated and combined with multivariate statistical analysis. Using the K-modes clustering algorithm, we combine geocoded socioeconomic data (e.g. age, sector and type of employment and income) with climate impact data (flood inundation level for different return periods, kysely days) on a 1kmx1km scale. Such development of archetypes aligns quantitative clusters with qualitative narratives, fostering mutual validation and a profound understanding of differential climate risk. Thus, the iterative exchange between quantitative and qualitative methods constitutes the backbone of this study. Through this approach, we identify reoccurring indicator combinations to disentangle the socioeconomic drivers of differential vulnerabilities and coping capacities in the context of flood- and heat-related climate risk. This sheds light on the within-country distribu

Climate change interacts with a multitude of social structures, determining individual risk and coping capacities. Existing socio-economic impact assessments of climate risk commonly focus on aggregate levels, such as GDP, leaving severe blind spots with respect to within-country distributional effects of climate change impacts. While research addressing this gap remains scarce, a profound understanding of social vulnerabilities across societal groups and the integration of these insights in impact and adaptation assessments is key for effective adaptation policy processes. Our study extends upon previous research assessing socioeconomic aggregates by shedding light on distributional effects of flood and heat-related climate risks within the Austrian society. We explore differential vulnerabilities and the patterns determining heterogeneities among agents through developing household archetypes. As this requires impact assessments to move beyond representing average regional effects, we bring together two ends of the spectrum: namely the generic representation of a single representative household and highly context specific risk determinants of individual households, by means of identifying recurring patterns.

Climate change interacts with a multitude of socioeconomic characteristics, for example, income, age, and employment, determining individual vulnerability and coping capacities. However, existing impact assessments of climate risk commonly focus on aggregate levels, leaving blind spots with respect to within-country distributional effects. Adhering to the concept of intersectionality, this study examines differential vulnerabilities and factors determining heterogeneities on a household level in the context of heat and flood related risks in Austria. To this end, we apply a mixed-methods approach to create narratives and storylines, integrating findings from a comprehensive literature review, stakeholder workshops, semi-structured interviews, and a multivariate statistical analysis. By exploring expert’s perceptions and framings around vulnerability, we identify and highlight the complex interrelationships between drivers of social vulnerability and the distribution across society for heat and flood related risk respectively. The knowledge generated is then developed into storylines and further contextualized by insights from a K-modes clustering algorithm that is based on geocoded socioeconomic data and climate impact data on a 1kmx1km scale. Through this integrated and participatory approach, three comprehensive storylines are developed per climate risk. The storylines i) contribute to a more effective communication of social vulnerability to stakeholders working on risk management, ii) allow for a more nuanced representation of society in climate impact assessments, and iii) inform the development of just and targeted adaptation measures and pathways for the equitable distribution of adaptation benefits.

Climate change and decarbonization raise complex justice questions that researchers and policymakers must address. The distributions of greenhouse gas emissions rights and mitigation efforts have dominated justice discourses within scenario research, an integrative element of the IPCC. However, the space of justice considerations is much larger. At present, there is no consistent approach to comprehensively incorporate and examine justice considerations. Here we propose a conceptual framework grounded in philosophical theory for this purpose. We apply this framework to climate mitigation scenarios literature as proof of concept, enabling a more holistic and multidimensional investigation of justice. We identify areas of future research, including new metrics of service provisioning essential for human well-being.

Climate change and decarbonization raise complex justice questions that researchers and policymakers must address. The distributions of greenhouse gas emissions rights and mitigation efforts have dominated justice discourses within scenario research, an integrative element of the IPCC. However, the space of justice considerations is much larger. At present, there is no consistent approach to comprehensively incorporate and examine justice considerations. Here we propose a conceptual framework grounded in philosophical theory for this purpose. We apply this framework to climate mitigation scenarios literature as proof of concept, enabling a more holistic and multidimensional investigation of justice. We identify areas of future research, including new metrics of service provisioning essential for human well-being.

Climate change and decarbonization raise complex justice questions that researchers and policymakers must address. The distributions of greenhouse gas emissions rights and mitigation efforts have dominated justice discourses within scenario research, an integrative element of the IPCC. However, the space of justice considerations is much larger. At present, there is no consistent approach to comprehensively incorporate and examine justice considerations. Here we propose a conceptual framework grounded in philosophical theory for this purpose. We apply this framework to climate mitigation scenarios literature as proof of concept, enabling a more holistic and multidimensional investigation of justice. We identify areas of future research, including new metrics of service provisioning essential for human well-being.

Researchers in sustainability science deal with increasingly complex problems that cross administrative, geographical, disciplinary, and sectoral boundaries, and are characterized by high stakes and deep uncertainties. This in turn creates methodological challenges to frame, structure, and solve complex problems in science and practice. There is a long tradition in visualizing systems as diagrams, and concept and cognitive maps, but there is insufficient differentiation and comparison between these methods and no clear umbrella term has yet been established. Against this background, we systematically review three foundational methods from different academic disciplines—causal diagrams, concept mapping, and cognitive mapping. Comparing and contrasting them, we facilitate a coherent understanding of qualitative systems mapping (QSM) as an umbrella term. We then proceed to explore the evident intersections between these methods to showcase some of the inter- and transdisciplinary opportunities and challenges crystallizing in integrated QSM approaches. Finally, we share case study insights from the food–water–biodiversity nexus in Austria and elaborate on some of the methodological nuances to data integration in QSM. Overall, with this overview paper, we lay the groundwork for a systematic, transparent, and yet flexible development and application of QSM methods to support mixed-methods research design and clear case study documentation, as well as fostering effective inter- and transdisciplinary communication in sustainability science. Further research needs to explore these QSM applications in depth across alternative sustainability science contexts, particularly with respect to efficient and rigorous protocols for knowledge and data integration vis-a-vis complex problems and transdisciplinary research processes.

Researchers in sustainability science deal with increasingly complex problems that cross administrative, geographical, disciplinary, and sectoral boundaries, and are characterized by high stakes and deep uncertainties. This in turn creates methodological challenges to frame, structure, and solve complex problems in science and practice. There is a long tradition in visualizing systems as diagrams, and concept and cognitive maps, but there is insufficient differentiation and comparison between these methods and no clear umbrella term has yet been established. Against this background, we systematically review three foundational methods from different academic disciplines—causal diagrams, concept mapping, and cognitive mapping. Comparing and contrasting them, we facilitate a coherent understanding of qualitative systems mapping (QSM) as an umbrella term. We then proceed to explore the evident intersections between these methods to showcase some of the inter- and transdisciplinary opportunities and challenges crystallizing in integrated QSM approaches. Finally, we share case study insights from the food–water–biodiversity nexus in Austria and elaborate on some of the methodological nuances to data integration in QSM. Overall, with this overview paper, we lay the groundwork for a systematic, transparent, and yet flexible development and application of QSM methods to support mixed-methods research design and clear case study documentation, as well as fostering effective inter- and transdisciplinary communication in sustainability science. Further research needs to explore these QSM applications in depth across alternative sustainability science contexts, particularly with respect to efficient and rigorous protocols for knowledge and data integration vis-a-vis complex problems and transdisciplinary research processes.

Researchers in sustainability science deal with increasingly complex problems that cross administrative, geographical, disciplinary, and sectoral boundaries, and are characterized by high stakes and deep uncertainties. This in turn creates methodological challenges to frame, structure, and solve complex problems in science and practice. There is a long tradition in visualizing systems as diagrams, and concept and cognitive maps, but there is insufficient differentiation and comparison between these methods and no clear umbrella term has yet been established. Against this background, we systematically review three foundational methods from different academic disciplines—causal diagrams, concept mapping, and cognitive mapping. Comparing and contrasting them, we facilitate a coherent understanding of qualitative systems mapping (QSM) as an umbrella term. We then proceed to explore the evident intersections between these methods to showcase some of the inter- and transdisciplinary opportunities and challenges crystallizing in integrated QSM approaches. Finally, we share case study insights from the food–water–biodiversity nexus in Austria and elaborate on some of the methodological nuances to data integration in QSM. Overall, with this overview paper, we lay the groundwork for a systematic, transparent, and yet flexible development and application of QSM methods to support mixed-methods research design and clear case study documentation, as well as fostering effective inter- and transdisciplinary communication in sustainability science. Further research needs to explore these QSM applications in depth across alternative sustainability science contexts, particularly with respect to efficient and rigorous protocols for knowledge and data integration vis-a-vis complex problems and transdisciplinary research processes.

Path dependency occurs when a contingent event predetermines what further steps can be taken and self-reinforcing mechanisms lock-in any further development on a sub-optimal trajectory. Path dependency is a prominent concept in the adaptation pathways literature, but insufficiently defined and operationalised. The present paper empirically tracks all constitutive elements of path dependency for four decades of flood risk management (FRM) in two alpine mountain regions in Austria, the Ennstal and Aist river catchments, using a mixed-methods approach. FRM governance has a critical role whether decisions lead to path dependency. Lock-in manifests not just in technical structures, but also in inertia of incumbent actor coalitions and management paradigms. Sub-optimality is hard to assess for lack of clearly defined protection targets; however, it appears in the ways that structural measures are implemented—too little, too late or with negative impacts on nature conservation. Past floods do not qualify as contingent events, as they have not fundamentally changed FRM practice. By contrast, technological and institutional shifts over longer periods, such as digital hazard maps and EU directives, have gradually reoriented FRM strategies. Institution-based self-reinforcing mechanisms are more prevalent than technology-based self-reinforcing mechanisms. Established actor coalitions combined with institutional density illustrate how those in charge uphold a path to defend their position, power and resources. Our recommendations for how to overcome path dependency in FRM governance are: encourage niche experiments, link FRM more closely with climate change adaptation, revise the national policy framework towards polycentric governance approaches and improve professional training.

The need for a compound risk governance system and management practice is argued in this paper. We find that, historically, risk management strategies have been developed for single hazards and are often subject to path dependency. It is thus difficult to adapt them to a situation that has compound risks. The lack of attention to compound risks in current risk management practices often leads to potential side effects—positive or negative—on other risks and can also result in related management strategies being overlooked. This can ultimately cause barriers to larger transformational adaptation efforts and lead to the intensification of existing societal inequalities or to the creation of new ones. To alert policy- and decision-makers to the need to move towards compound-risk management strategies, we argue that risk management must explicitly highlight various elements of path dependencies, the positive and negative side effects of single-hazard risk management, the appearance of new social inequalities, and the intensification of existing ones.

Klimabedingt zunehmende Hitze und Trockenheit wirken sich negativ auf die landwirtschaftliche Produktion im Seewinkel aus. Als Anpassungsmaßnahme wird oft die landwirtschaftliche Bewässerung intensiviert. Dies wiederum wirkt sich negativ auf die Grundwasserstände und indirekt auf die selbst vom Klimawandel stark betroffenen Ökosysteme aus. Eine qualitative Analyse zeigt systematisch auf, ob und wie die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik (GAP) den Wasserverbrauch der Landwirtschaft beeinflussen kann. Basierend darauf wurden Lösungsansätze formuliert, die es zur Reduktion der Bewässerung von unterschiedlichen Stakeholder*innen wie weiterverarbeitenden Betrieben, Handel, und Konsument*innen braucht. Increasing climate-related heat and drought are having a negative impact on agricultural production in Seewinkel. Agricultural irrigation is often intensified as an adaptation measure. This in turn has a negative impact on groundwater levels and indirectly on the ecosystems themselves that are severely affected by climate change. A qualitative analysis systematically shows whether and how the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) can influence water consumption in agriculture. Based on this, possible solutions, which are needed to reduce agricultural irrigation and require uptake from various stakeholders such as processing companies, retailers and consumers, were formulated.

Systems approaches provide tools to address the increasing complexity of societal challenges. However, current qualitative system map (QSM) approaches lack the ability to visualize findings early on in a research process and systematically document and integrate qualitative data in an efficient, low-resources manner. Therefore, we propose a novel application for QSM – Integrative Qualitative System Map (IQSM) – which was developed in the WaterStressAT project.

In most of Europe, the decarbonisation of the building and transport sectors lags behind emission targets. Achieving full decarbonisation requires not only the diffusion of net-zero emission technologies but also the phase-out of technologies that emit greenhouse gases (GHG). However, implementing policy changes in these sectors can have an immediate and significant impact on people's day-to-day life, leading to a higher risk of political backlash, as exemplified by the yellow vest movement in France. In this study, we investigate public preferences for phase-out policy packages in both sectors in Germany by conducting two conjoint experiments with 1,777 respondents in March 2022. Respondents collectively evaluated a total of 17,770 policy packages per sector, specifically targeting the phase-out of fossil fuel-based heating systems and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). We find that respondents favour earlier phase-out dates for both technologies, but the type of preferred instruments varies: while regulatory instruments like bans are preferred for heating systems, economic instruments like taxes are preferred for ICEVs. These preferences are even more pronounced in people most concerned about climate change. In addition, we find that people with higher knowledge about sector emissions tend to demonstrate higher acceptance of policy interventions and that supportive measures significantly enhance the attractiveness of policy packages. Our findings can inform the design of phase-out policy packages, potentially increasing their acceptability and political feasibility.

Klimabedingt zunehmende Hitze und Trockenheit wirken sich negativ auf die landwirtschaftliche Produktion im Seewinkel aus. Als Anpassungsmaßnahme wird oft die landwirtschaftliche Bewässerung intensiviert. Dies wiederum wirkt sich negativ auf die Grundwasserstände und indirekt auf die selbst vom Klimawandel stark betroffenen Ökosysteme aus. Eine qualitative Analyse zeigt systematisch auf, ob und wie die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik (GAP) den Wasserverbrauch der Landwirtschaft beeinflussen kann. Basierend darauf wurden Lösungsansätze formuliert, die es zur Reduktion der Bewässerung von unterschiedlichen Stakeholder*innen wie weiterverarbeitenden Betrieben, Handel, und Konsument*innen braucht. Increasing climate-related heat and drought are having a negative impact on agricultural production in Seewinkel. Agricultural irrigation is often intensified as an adaptation measure. This in turn has a negative impact on groundwater levels and indirectly on the ecosystems themselves that are severely affected by climate change. A qualitative analysis systematically shows whether and how the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) can influence water consumption in agriculture. Based on this, possible solutions, which are needed to reduce agricultural irrigation and require uptake from various stakeholders such as processing companies, retailers and consumers, were formulated.

Systems approaches provide tools to address the increasing complexity of societal challenges. However, current qualitative system map (QSM) approaches lack the ability to visualize findings early on in a research process and systematically document and integrate qualitative data in an efficient, low-resources manner. Therefore, we propose a novel application for QSM – Integrative Qualitative System Map (IQSM) – which was developed in the WaterStressAT project.

In most of Europe, the decarbonisation of the building and transport sectors lags behind emission targets. Achieving full decarbonisation requires not only the diffusion of net-zero emission technologies but also the phase-out of technologies that emit greenhouse gases (GHG). However, implementing policy changes in these sectors can have an immediate and significant impact on people's day-to-day life, leading to a higher risk of political backlash, as exemplified by the yellow vest movement in France. In this study, we investigate public preferences for phase-out policy packages in both sectors in Germany by conducting two conjoint experiments with 1,777 respondents in March 2022. Respondents collectively evaluated a total of 17,770 policy packages per sector, specifically targeting the phase-out of fossil fuel-based heating systems and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). We find that respondents favour earlier phase-out dates for both technologies, but the type of preferred instruments varies: while regulatory instruments like bans are preferred for heating systems, economic instruments like taxes are preferred for ICEVs. These preferences are even more pronounced in people most concerned about climate change. In addition, we find that people with higher knowledge about sector emissions tend to demonstrate higher acceptance of policy interventions and that supportive measures significantly enhance the attractiveness of policy packages. Our findings can inform the design of phase-out policy packages, potentially increasing their acceptability and political feasibility.

Klimabedingt zunehmende Hitze und Trockenheit wirken sich negativ auf die landwirtschaftliche Produktion im Seewinkel aus. Als Anpassungsmaßnahme wird oft die landwirtschaftliche Bewässerung intensiviert. Dies wiederum wirkt sich negativ auf die Grundwasserstände und indirekt auf die selbst vom Klimawandel stark betroffenen Ökosysteme aus. Eine qualitative Analyse zeigt systematisch auf, ob und wie die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik (GAP) den Wasserverbrauch der Landwirtschaft beeinflussen kann. Basierend darauf wurden Lösungsansätze formuliert, die es zur Reduktion der Bewässerung von unterschiedlichen Stakeholder*innen wie weiterverarbeitenden Betrieben, Handel, und Konsument*innen braucht. Increasing climate-related heat and drought are having a negative impact on agricultural production in Seewinkel. Agricultural irrigation is often intensified as an adaptation measure. This in turn has a negative impact on groundwater levels and indirectly on the ecosystems themselves that are severely affected by climate change. A qualitative analysis systematically shows whether and how the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) can influence water consumption in agriculture. Based on this, possible solutions, which are needed to reduce agricultural irrigation and require uptake from various stakeholders such as processing companies, retailers and consumers, were formulated.

In most of Europe, the decarbonisation of the building and transport sectors lags behind emission targets. Achieving full decarbonisation requires not only the diffusion of net-zero emission technologies but also the phase-out of technologies that emit greenhouse gases (GHG). However, implementing policy changes in these sectors can have an immediate and significant impact on people's day-to-day life, leading to a higher risk of political backlash, as exemplified by the yellow vest movement in France. In this study, we investigate public preferences for phase-out policy packages in both sectors in Germany by conducting two conjoint experiments with 1,777 respondents in March 2022. Respondents collectively evaluated a total of 17,770 policy packages per sector, specifically targeting the phase-out of fossil fuel-based heating systems and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). We find that respondents favour earlier phase-out dates for both technologies, but the type of preferred instruments varies: while regulatory instruments like bans are preferred for heating systems, economic instruments like taxes are preferred for ICEVs. These preferences are even more pronounced in people most concerned about climate change. In addition, we find that people with higher knowledge about sector emissions tend to demonstrate higher acceptance of policy interventions and that supportive measures significantly enhance the attractiveness of policy packages. Our findings can inform the design of phase-out policy packages, potentially increasing their acceptability and political feasibility.

Systems approaches provide tools to address the increasing complexity of societal challenges. However, current qualitative system map (QSM) approaches lack the ability to visualize findings early on in a research process and systematically document and integrate qualitative data in an efficient, low-resources manner. Therefore, we propose a novel application for QSM – Integrative Qualitative System Map (IQSM) – which was developed in the WaterStressAT project.

The need for a compound risk governance system and management practice is argued in this paper. We find that, historically, risk management strategies have been developed for single hazards and are often subject to path dependency. It is thus difficult to adapt them to a situation that has compound risks. The lack of attention to compound risks in current risk management practices often leads to potential side effects—positive or negative—on other risks and can also result in related management strategies being overlooked. This can ultimately cause barriers to larger transformational adaptation efforts and lead to the intensification of existing societal inequalities or to the creation of new ones. To alert policy- and decision-makers to the need to move towards compound-risk management strategies, we argue that risk management must explicitly highlight various elements of path dependencies, the positive and negative side effects of single-hazard risk management, the appearance of new social inequalities, and the intensification of existing ones.

The need for a compound risk governance system and management practice is argued in this paper. We find that, historically, risk management strategies have been developed for single hazards and are often subject to path dependency. It is thus difficult to adapt them to a situation that has compound risks. The lack of attention to compound risks in current risk management practices often leads to potential side effects—positive or negative—on other risks and can also result in related management strategies being overlooked. This can ultimately cause barriers to larger transformational adaptation efforts and lead to the intensification of existing societal inequalities or to the creation of new ones. To alert policy- and decision-makers to the need to move towards compound-risk management strategies, we argue that risk management must explicitly highlight various elements of path dependencies, the positive and negative side effects of single-hazard risk management, the appearance of new social inequalities, and the intensification of existing ones.

Path dependency occurs when a contingent event predetermines what further steps can be taken and self-reinforcing mechanisms lock-in any further development on a sub-optimal trajectory. Path dependency is a prominent concept in the adaptation pathways literature, but insufficiently defined and operationalised. The present paper empirically tracks all constitutive elements of path dependency for four decades of flood risk management (FRM) in two alpine mountain regions in Austria, the Ennstal and Aist river catchments, using a mixed-methods approach. FRM governance has a critical role whether decisions lead to path dependency. Lock-in manifests not just in technical structures, but also in inertia of incumbent actor coalitions and management paradigms. Sub-optimality is hard to assess for lack of clearly defined protection targets; however, it appears in the ways that structural measures are implemented—too little, too late or with negative impacts on nature conservation. Past floods do not qualify as contingent events, as they have not fundamentally changed FRM practice. By contrast, technological and institutional shifts over longer periods, such as digital hazard maps and EU directives, have gradually reoriented FRM strategies. Institution-based self-reinforcing mechanisms are more prevalent than technology-based self-reinforcing mechanisms. Established actor coalitions combined with institutional density illustrate how those in charge uphold a path to defend their position, power and resources. Our recommendations for how to overcome path dependency in FRM governance are: encourage niche experiments, link FRM more closely with climate change adaptation, revise the national policy framework towards polycentric governance approaches and improve professional training.

Path dependency occurs when a contingent event predetermines what further steps can be taken and self-reinforcing mechanisms lock-in any further development on a sub-optimal trajectory. Path dependency is a prominent concept in the adaptation pathways literature, but insufficiently defined and operationalised. The present paper empirically tracks all constitutive elements of path dependency for four decades of flood risk management (FRM) in two alpine mountain regions in Austria, the Ennstal and Aist river catchments, using a mixed-methods approach. FRM governance has a critical role whether decisions lead to path dependency. Lock-in manifests not just in technical structures, but also in inertia of incumbent actor coalitions and management paradigms. Sub-optimality is hard to assess for lack of clearly defined protection targets; however, it appears in the ways that structural measures are implemented—too little, too late or with negative impacts on nature conservation. Past floods do not qualify as contingent events, as they have not fundamentally changed FRM practice. By contrast, technological and institutional shifts over longer periods, such as digital hazard maps and EU directives, have gradually reoriented FRM strategies. Institution-based self-reinforcing mechanisms are more prevalent than technology-based self-reinforcing mechanisms. Established actor coalitions combined with institutional density illustrate how those in charge uphold a path to defend their position, power and resources. Our recommendations for how to overcome path dependency in FRM governance are: encourage niche experiments, link FRM more closely with climate change adaptation, revise the national policy framework towards polycentric governance approaches and improve professional training.

Agricultural ecosystems provide essential services mainly through food, feed, fiber and consequently income but they also contribute cultural, supporting and regulating services. In turn, farming can adversely affect ecosystem services, especially those from natural ecosystems, if farming practices are unsustainable. Recently, a Sustainable Agriculture Matrix (SAM; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.015) of indicators across environmental, economic, and social dimensions has been developed by an international research team to coherently quantify the sustainability of countries’ farming systems globally. The focus was on indicators that can be tracked over time and relate to performance to facilitate analyzes of synergies and trade-offs. At present, this indicator system is being co-evaluated with stakeholders in ten countries within an international consortium including Austria, to elicit stakeholders’ appraisal of the framework’s applicability in their specific geographical and socioeconomic context and eventually co-design a revised matrix based on stakeholders’ requirements. A first workshop has shown that most indicators from the environmental dimension are useful for stakeholders in the Austrian context, but some need further refinements. Biodiversity, for example, is only considered via land cover change whereas threats to (agro-)biodiversity in Austria and the EU foremost occur in-situ. The economic dimension is ranking second in its usefulness for Austrian stakeholders with few indicators such as food loss being of little relevance. The indicators presently included in the social dimension are least relevant as they cover aspects such as land rights, undernourishment, and rural poverty, which do not pose major issues in Austria and more broadly the EU. General concerns of stakeholders are the directionality of indicator ratings and their scope which is in part considered too narrow. E.g., high government expenditure for agriculture is considered positi

Agricultural ecosystems provide essential services mainly through food, feed, fiber and consequently income but they also contribute cultural, supporting and regulating services. In turn, farming can adversely affect ecosystem services, especially those from natural ecosystems, if farming practices are unsustainable. Recently, a Sustainable Agriculture Matrix (SAM; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.015) of indicators across environmental, economic, and social dimensions has been developed by an international research team to coherently quantify the sustainability of countries’ farming systems globally. The focus was on indicators that can be tracked over time and relate to performance to facilitate analyzes of synergies and trade-offs. At present, this indicator system is being co-evaluated with stakeholders in ten countries within an international consortium including Austria, to elicit stakeholders’ appraisal of the framework’s applicability in their specific geographical and socioeconomic context and eventually co-design a revised matrix based on stakeholders’ requirements. A first workshop has shown that most indicators from the environmental dimension are useful for stakeholders in the Austrian context, but some need further refinements. Biodiversity, for example, is only considered via land cover change whereas threats to (agro-)biodiversity in Austria and the EU foremost occur in-situ. The economic dimension is ranking second in its usefulness for Austrian stakeholders with few indicators such as food loss being of little relevance. The indicators presently included in the social dimension are least relevant as they cover aspects such as land rights, undernourishment, and rural poverty, which do not pose major issues in Austria and more broadly the EU. General concerns of stakeholders are the directionality of indicator ratings and their scope which is in part considered too narrow. E.g., high government expenditure for agriculture is considered positi

Agricultural ecosystems provide essential services mainly through food, feed, fiber and consequently income but they also contribute cultural, supporting and regulating services. In turn, farming can adversely affect ecosystem services, especially those from natural ecosystems, if farming practices are unsustainable. Recently, a Sustainable Agriculture Matrix (SAM; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.015) of indicators across environmental, economic, and social dimensions has been developed by an international research team to coherently quantify the sustainability of countries’ farming systems globally. The focus was on indicators that can be tracked over time and relate to performance to facilitate analyzes of synergies and trade-offs. At present, this indicator system is being co-evaluated with stakeholders in ten countries within an international consortium including Austria, to elicit stakeholders’ appraisal of the framework’s applicability in their specific geographical and socioeconomic context and eventually co-design a revised matrix based on stakeholders’ requirements. A first workshop has shown that most indicators from the environmental dimension are useful for stakeholders in the Austrian context, but some need further refinements. Biodiversity, for example, is only considered via land cover change whereas threats to (agro-)biodiversity in Austria and the EU foremost occur in-situ. The economic dimension is ranking second in its usefulness for Austrian stakeholders with few indicators such as food loss being of little relevance. The indicators presently included in the social dimension are least relevant as they cover aspects such as land rights, undernourishment, and rural poverty, which do not pose major issues in Austria and more broadly the EU. General concerns of stakeholders are the directionality of indicator ratings and their scope which is in part considered too narrow. E.g., high government expenditure for agriculture is considered positi

IT systems design and architecture have many similarities with the design of organisations and institutions. Both pay attention to social concepts such as rules, norms, and values. Justice is one of the key concepts that can be relevant for any institutional design from a systems perspective. This paper outlines an ontology of justice based on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). We envisage that it can support designers in recognising and addressing the issues of justice during systems design and analysis, including elicitation of requirements, rules analysis, systems evaluation, and policy analysis.

IT systems design and architecture have many similarities with the design of organisations and institutions. Both pay attention to social concepts such as rules, norms, and values. Justice is one of the key concepts that can be relevant for any institutional design from a systems perspective. This paper outlines an ontology of justice based on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). We envisage that it can support designers in recognising and addressing the issues of justice during systems design and analysis, including elicitation of requirements, rules analysis, systems evaluation, and policy analysis.

IT systems design and architecture have many similarities with the design of organisations and institutions. Both pay attention to social concepts such as rules, norms, and values. Justice is one of the key concepts that can be relevant for any institutional design from a systems perspective. This paper outlines an ontology of justice based on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). We envisage that it can support designers in recognising and addressing the issues of justice during systems design and analysis, including elicitation of requirements, rules analysis, systems evaluation, and policy analysis.

Adaptation pathway approaches (APAs) have become an increasingly popular means of facilitating local and regional anticipatory planning under the influence of climate change. Many studies in this field of research identify path dependencies as a key barrier to adaptation efforts. However, their respective definitions of path dependency are often vague and impede a comprehensive integration of this concept into APAs. We fill this gap by systematically exploring the constituent characteristics and conditions of path dependency based on the original theoretical literature that emerged in the 1980s and early 2000s. We then propose an operationalization based on examples of flood risk management practice, and highlight ways in which APAs may contribute to revealing and anticipating technological and institutional path dependencies. This conceptual work serves as a comprehensive and systematic baseline for analyzing path dependency in empirical studies using APAs within and beyond the flood risk context.

Entscheidungen im lokalen Management von klimabedingten Risiken, wie z.B. im Hochwasserrisikomanagement, erfolgen regelmäßig sehr rasch nach einem Ereignis, u.a. auch aufgrund massiven Drucks der lokalen Bevölkerung. Dabei werden meist Maßnahmen umgesetzt, die allgemein bekannt sind und dem Stand der Technik entsprechen. Diese singulären und sich an der Vergangenheit orientierenden Entscheidungen führen aber dazu, dass sich das Schadenspotential in den Gemeinden und Regionen meist weiterentwickelt und den zukünftigen Herausforderungen im Risikomanagement aufgrund des Klimawandels nur unzureichend genügt. Deshalb ist es wichtig, aktuelle Pfadabhängigkeiten frühzeitig zu erkennen und eine Entkoppelung davon zu erzielen. Nur so kann ein antizipatives Klimarisikomanagement umgesetzt und verstetigt werden, welches auch über einzelne klimabedingte Risiken hinweg agiert. Der Leitfaden „Gestaltung von Anpassungspfaden im Klimarisikomanagement“ dient als mögliche Erweiterung des „Vorsorgechecks Naturgefahren im Klimawandel“, welcher den Status Quo aller in einer Gemeinde möglichen Naturgefahren abhandelt. Dieser Leitfaden richtet sich somit vorrangig an jene österreichischen Gemeinden, die entweder bereits einen solchen „Naturgefahrencheck“ absolviert haben oder dies in Zukunft noch vorhaben. Der Leitfaden schlägt fünf konkrete Schritte vor, um im Anschluss an die Methodik des Naturgefahrenchecks (1) das Bewusstsein für die Zusammenhänge zwischen einzelnen klimabedingten Risiken zu schärfen, (2) aus den bisher gemachten Erfahrungen im Naturgefahrenmanagement für die „neuen“ Risiken zu lernen und (3) gemeinsam konkrete Maßnahmen zu entwerfen und nächste Umsetzungsschritte zu definieren, wie diese Risiken in Zukunft zusammen gedacht und proaktiv angegangen werden können. Der Leitfaden ist so aufgebaut, dass bei Bedarf auch jeder Schritt als einzelnes gesondertes Erweiterungsmodul für den „Vorsorgechecks Naturgefahren im Klimawandel“ dienen kann.

In fairSTREAM, we propose a transdisciplinary research approach using a combination of qualitative and quantitative systems tools to explore challenges related to food, water and biodiversity (FWB), their cross-sectoral interlinkages and emerging aspects related to fairness in the Upper Bhima Basin (India). We do so by co-producing qualitative storylines with local stakeholders (e.g., farmers, NGOs, water managers, politicians) to address issues at and future developments of the FWB-nexus.

In fairSTREAM, we propose a transdisciplinary research approach using a combination of qualitative and quantitative systems tools to explore challenges related to food, water and biodiversity (FWB), their cross-sectoral interlinkages and emerging aspects related to fairness in the Upper Bhima Basin (India). We do so by co-producing qualitative storylines with local stakeholders (e.g., farmers, NGOs, water managers, politicians) to address issues at and future developments of the FWB-nexus.

Entscheidungen im lokalen Management von klimabedingten Risiken, wie z.B. im Hochwasserrisikomanagement, erfolgen regelmäßig sehr rasch nach einem Ereignis, u.a. auch aufgrund massiven Drucks der lokalen Bevölkerung. Dabei werden meist Maßnahmen umgesetzt, die allgemein bekannt sind und dem Stand der Technik entsprechen. Diese singulären und sich an der Vergangenheit orientierenden Entscheidungen führen aber dazu, dass sich das Schadenspotential in den Gemeinden und Regionen meist weiterentwickelt und den zukünftigen Herausforderungen im Risikomanagement aufgrund des Klimawandels nur unzureichend genügt. Deshalb ist es wichtig, aktuelle Pfadabhängigkeiten frühzeitig zu erkennen und eine Entkoppelung davon zu erzielen. Nur so kann ein antizipatives Klimarisikomanagement umgesetzt und verstetigt werden, welches auch über einzelne klimabedingte Risiken hinweg agiert. Der Leitfaden „Gestaltung von Anpassungspfaden im Klimarisikomanagement“ dient als mögliche Erweiterung des „Vorsorgechecks Naturgefahren im Klimawandel“, welcher den Status Quo aller in einer Gemeinde möglichen Naturgefahren abhandelt. Dieser Leitfaden richtet sich somit vorrangig an jene österreichischen Gemeinden, die entweder bereits einen solchen „Naturgefahrencheck“ absolviert haben oder dies in Zukunft noch vorhaben. Der Leitfaden schlägt fünf konkrete Schritte vor, um im Anschluss an die Methodik des Naturgefahrenchecks (1) das Bewusstsein für die Zusammenhänge zwischen einzelnen klimabedingten Risiken zu schärfen, (2) aus den bisher gemachten Erfahrungen im Naturgefahrenmanagement für die „neuen“ Risiken zu lernen und (3) gemeinsam konkrete Maßnahmen zu entwerfen und nächste Umsetzungsschritte zu definieren, wie diese Risiken in Zukunft zusammen gedacht und proaktiv angegangen werden können. Der Leitfaden ist so aufgebaut, dass bei Bedarf auch jeder Schritt als einzelnes gesondertes Erweiterungsmodul für den „Vorsorgechecks Naturgefahren im Klimawandel“ dienen kann.

Entscheidungen im lokalen Management von klimabedingten Risiken, wie z.B. im Hochwasserrisikomanagement, erfolgen regelmäßig sehr rasch nach einem Ereignis, u.a. auch aufgrund massiven Drucks der lokalen Bevölkerung. Dabei werden meist Maßnahmen umgesetzt, die allgemein bekannt sind und dem Stand der Technik entsprechen. Diese singulären und sich an der Vergangenheit orientierenden Entscheidungen führen aber dazu, dass sich das Schadenspotential in den Gemeinden und Regionen meist weiterentwickelt und den zukünftigen Herausforderungen im Risikomanagement aufgrund des Klimawandels nur unzureichend genügt. Deshalb ist es wichtig, aktuelle Pfadabhängigkeiten frühzeitig zu erkennen und eine Entkoppelung davon zu erzielen. Nur so kann ein antizipatives Klimarisikomanagement umgesetzt und verstetigt werden, welches auch über einzelne klimabedingte Risiken hinweg agiert. Der Leitfaden „Gestaltung von Anpassungspfaden im Klimarisikomanagement“ dient als mögliche Erweiterung des „Vorsorgechecks Naturgefahren im Klimawandel“, welcher den Status Quo aller in einer Gemeinde möglichen Naturgefahren abhandelt. Dieser Leitfaden richtet sich somit vorrangig an jene österreichischen Gemeinden, die entweder bereits einen solchen „Naturgefahrencheck“ absolviert haben oder dies in Zukunft noch vorhaben. Der Leitfaden schlägt fünf konkrete Schritte vor, um im Anschluss an die Methodik des Naturgefahrenchecks (1) das Bewusstsein für die Zusammenhänge zwischen einzelnen klimabedingten Risiken zu schärfen, (2) aus den bisher gemachten Erfahrungen im Naturgefahrenmanagement für die „neuen“ Risiken zu lernen und (3) gemeinsam konkrete Maßnahmen zu entwerfen und nächste Umsetzungsschritte zu definieren, wie diese Risiken in Zukunft zusammen gedacht und proaktiv angegangen werden können. Der Leitfaden ist so aufgebaut, dass bei Bedarf auch jeder Schritt als einzelnes gesondertes Erweiterungsmodul für den „Vorsorgechecks Naturgefahren im Klimawandel“ dienen kann.

In fairSTREAM, we propose a transdisciplinary research approach using a combination of qualitative and quantitative systems tools to explore challenges related to food, water and biodiversity (FWB), their cross-sectoral interlinkages and emerging aspects related to fairness in the Upper Bhima Basin (India). We do so by co-producing qualitative storylines with local stakeholders (e.g., farmers, NGOs, water managers, politicians) to address issues at and future developments of the FWB-nexus.

Adaptation pathway approaches (APAs) have become an increasingly popular means of facilitating local and regional anticipatory planning under the influence of climate change. Many studies in this field of research identify path dependencies as a key barrier to adaptation efforts. However, their respective definitions of path dependency are often vague and impede a comprehensive integration of this concept into APAs. We fill this gap by systematically exploring the constituent characteristics and conditions of path dependency based on the original theoretical literature that emerged in the 1980s and early 2000s. We then propose an operationalization based on examples of flood risk management practice, and highlight ways in which APAs may contribute to revealing and anticipating technological and institutional path dependencies. This conceptual work serves as a comprehensive and systematic baseline for analyzing path dependency in empirical studies using APAs within and beyond the flood risk context.

Adaptation pathway approaches (APAs) have become an increasingly popular means of facilitating local and regional anticipatory planning under the influence of climate change. Many studies in this field of research identify path dependencies as a key barrier to adaptation efforts. However, their respective definitions of path dependency are often vague and impede a comprehensive integration of this concept into APAs. We fill this gap by systematically exploring the constituent characteristics and conditions of path dependency based on the original theoretical literature that emerged in the 1980s and early 2000s. We then propose an operationalization based on examples of flood risk management practice, and highlight ways in which APAs may contribute to revealing and anticipating technological and institutional path dependencies. This conceptual work serves as a comprehensive and systematic baseline for analyzing path dependency in empirical studies using APAs within and beyond the flood risk context.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: There is heterogeneity in the names and anatomical descriptions of regional anesthetic techniques. This may have adverse consequences on education, research, and implementation into clinical practice. We aimed to produce standardized nomenclature for abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall regional anesthetic techniques. METHODS: We conducted an international consensus study involving experts using a three-round Delphi method to produce a list of names and corresponding descriptions of anatomical targets. After long-list formulation by a Steering Committee, the first and second rounds involved anonymous electronic voting and commenting, with the third round involving a virtual round table discussion aiming to achieve consensus on items that had yet to achieve it. Novel names were presented where required for anatomical clarity and harmonization. Strong consensus was defined as >/=75% agreement and weak consensus as 50% to 74% agreement. RESULTS: Sixty expert Collaborators participated in this study. After three rounds and clarification, harmonization, and introduction of novel nomenclature, strong consensus was achieved for the names of 16 block names and weak consensus for four names. For anatomical descriptions, strong consensus was achieved for 19 blocks and weak consensus was achieved for one approach. Several areas requiring further research were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Harmonization and standardization of nomenclature may improve education, research, and ultimately patient care. We present the first international consensus on nomenclature and anatomical descriptions of blocks of the abdominal wall, chest wall, and paraspinal blocks. We recommend using the consensus results in academic and clinical practice.