Search

Chronic drainage of the thoracic duct to the esophagus was developed in dogs, and its efficacy in immunomodulation was tested using kidney transplantation. Compared to 9.7 days in the control, the mean animal survival was prolonged to 9.9 days, 17.8 days, and 18.5 days when TDD was applied preoperatively for 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 9 weeks, respectively. Prolongation was significant after 6 weeks. Patency of the fistula was 93.5, 80.4, and 76.1% at respective weeks. Number of peripheral T-lymphocytes determined by a new monoclonal antibody diminished after 3 weeks. All animals were in normal health, requiring no special care for fluid, electrolyte, or protein replacement.

Control serum levels of IL-6 measured by ELISA in 30 healthy blood donors or volunteers were 18±34 pg/ml (mean ± SD). Pretransplant serum levels of IL-6 in 169 adult candidates for liver transplantation were significantly higher than control in those with fulminant hepatitis (203±232 pg/ml), alcoholic cirrhosis (116±257 pg/ml), and hepatocellular carcinoma (82± 105 pg/ml). With these data as background, plasma or serum levels of IL-6 were monitored in 24 adult patients after first OLT and correlated with the clinical courses and the histopathological diagnosis of rejection. Serum or plasma levels of IL-6 decreased after transplantation regardless of pretransplant value. Four patients with infection subsequently developed continuously high IL-6 values. In the 20 of 24 patients who did not have infection, significantly higher levels of IL-6 were consistently found 0-4 days before histopathological diagnosis of rejection (131±78 pg/ml) compared with significantly lower values in patients without rejection episodes (40±21 pg/ml). The elevations of IL-6 were spike shaped, did not correlate well with the histopathological grades of rejection, and were highly responsive to augmented immunosuppression. These 20 cases were classified as: Group 1, no spikes of IL-6 after liver transplantation; group 2, single spike of IL-6 after liver transplantation; and group 3, multiple spikes of IL-6 after liver transplantation. The combined early and late graft loss of each group was 0% (group 1), 25% (group 2), and 67% (group 3). We conclude that daily monitored serum or plasma IL-6 levels can be a good premonitor of liver allograft rejection and also a useful predictor of long-term graft outcome. © 1994 by Williams & Wilkins.

Control serum levels of IL-6 measured by ELISA in 30 healthy blood donors or volunteers were 18±34 pg/ml (mean ± SD). Pretransplant serum levels of IL-6 in 169 adult candidates for liver transplantation were significantly higher than control in those with fulminant hepatitis (203±232 pg/ml), alcoholic cirrhosis (116±257 pg/ml), and hepatocellular carcinoma (82± 105 pg/ml). With these data as background, plasma or serum levels of IL-6 were monitored in 24 adult patients after first OLT and correlated with the clinical courses and the histopathological diagnosis of rejection. Serum or plasma levels of IL-6 decreased after transplantation regardless of pretransplant value. Four patients with infection subsequently developed continuously high IL-6 values. In the 20 of 24 patients who did not have infection, significantly higher levels of IL-6 were consistently found 0-4 days before histopathological diagnosis of rejection (131±78 pg/ml) compared with significantly lower values in patients without rejection episodes (40±21 pg/ml). The elevations of IL-6 were spike shaped, did not correlate well with the histopathological grades of rejection, and were highly responsive to augmented immunosuppression. These 20 cases were classified as: Group 1, no spikes of IL-6 after liver transplantation; group 2, single spike of IL-6 after liver transplantation; and group 3, multiple spikes of IL-6 after liver transplantation. The combined early and late graft loss of each group was 0% (group 1), 25% (group 2), and 67% (group 3). We conclude that daily monitored serum or plasma IL-6 levels can be a good premonitor of liver allograft rejection and also a useful predictor of long-term graft outcome. © 1994 by Williams & Wilkins.

Twenty‐six adult patients with preformed IgG donor lymphocytotoxic antibodies received primary liver allografts under FK 506 immunosuppression. The effect of the crossmatch‐positive state on early graft function and on the immunopathological and histopathological findings was compared with that of 52 crossmatch‐negative control recipients. The presensitized (crossmatch‐positive) patients had prolongation of early graft dysfunction, underwent more clinically indicated biopsies and had a higher incidence of cellular rejection, both overall (p < 0.05) and within 10 days of transplantation (p < 0.01). They also had a higher incidence of graft failure in the first 180 days (p < 0.01). Hyperacute rejection with necrotizing or neutrophilic arteritis was not seen in the crossmatchpositive grafts. However, histological findings associated with presensitization included platelet margination in central veins and sinusoids in biopsy specimens 60 to 90 min after graft revascularization. Later biopsy specimens had neutrophilic portal venulitis followed by cholangiolar proliferation, acute cholangiolitis and centrilobular hepatocyte swelling that mimicked preservation injury, endothelial activation of arteries with medial changes and relapsing episodes of acute cellular rejection. These clinicopathological observations suggest that lymphocytotoxic antibodies can have a deleterious effect on liver allograft function and survival, even if they do not precipitate immediate or hyperacute rejection. (HEPATOLOGY 1992;16:671–681.) Copyright © 1992 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Because of the liver graft's ability to resist cytotoxic antibody-mediated rejection, it has become dogma that the conventional transplant crossmatch used to avoid hyperacute rejection of other organs is irrelevant to the liver. We examined this hypothesis in a consecutive series of adult primary liver recipients treated with FK506 and low-dose steroids. Twenty-five of 231 (10.8%) patients received a liver from a cytotoxic-positive crossmatch donor (more than 50% of donor T lymphocytes were killed by dithiothre-itol-pretreated recipient serum). The outcome was compared with that of 50 negative crossmatch patients who had their transplantations just before and after the crossmatch positive cases. The one-year graft and patient survivals were 56% and 68%, for positive and 82% and 86% for negative crossmatch patients (P=0.004, P=0.03, respectively). The difference between patient and first graft survival was accounted for by retransplantation, which was 4 times more frequent in the positive-crossmatch cases. Histologically, failed allografts obtained at the time of retransplantation revealed a spectrum of pathologic findings related to vascular injury. This study showed a higher difficulty of intraoperative blood product management, a degraded prognosis, and a poorer average quality of ultimate graft function when liver transplantation was performed against positive cytotoxic crossmatches. In such patients for whom crossmatch-negative donors may never be found because of the broad extent and intensity of sensitization, special therapeutic strategies perioperatively must be evolved if results are to improve. © 1992 by Williams and Wilkins.

Five patients had complete cadaveric small bowel transplants under FK506 immunosuppression, one as an isolated graft and the other 4 in continuity with a liver. Three were children and two were adults. The five patients are living 2-13 months posttransplantation with complete alimentation by the intestine. The typical postoperative course was stormy, with sluggish resumption of gastrointestinal function. The patient with small intestinal transplantation alone had the most difficult course of the five, including two severe rejections, bacterial and fungal translocation with bacteremia, renal failure with the rejections, and permanent consignment to renal dialysis. The first four patients (studies on the fifth were incomplete) had replacement of the lymphor-eticular cells in the graft lamina propria by their own lymphoreticular cells. Although the surgical and aftercare of these patients was difficult, the eventual uniform success suggests that intestinal transplantation has moved toward becoming a practical clinical service. © 1992 by Williams and Wilkins.

Twenty‐six adult patients with preformed IgG donor lymphocytotoxic antibodies received primary liver allografts under FK 506 immunosuppression. The effect of the crossmatch‐positive state on early graft function and on the immunopathological and histopathological findings was compared with that of 52 crossmatch‐negative control recipients. The presensitized (crossmatch‐positive) patients had prolongation of early graft dysfunction, underwent more clinically indicated biopsies and had a higher incidence of cellular rejection, both overall (p < 0.05) and within 10 days of transplantation (p < 0.01). They also had a higher incidence of graft failure in the first 180 days (p < 0.01). Hyperacute rejection with necrotizing or neutrophilic arteritis was not seen in the crossmatchpositive grafts. However, histological findings associated with presensitization included platelet margination in central veins and sinusoids in biopsy specimens 60 to 90 min after graft revascularization. Later biopsy specimens had neutrophilic portal venulitis followed by cholangiolar proliferation, acute cholangiolitis and centrilobular hepatocyte swelling that mimicked preservation injury, endothelial activation of arteries with medial changes and relapsing episodes of acute cellular rejection. These clinicopathological observations suggest that lymphocytotoxic antibodies can have a deleterious effect on liver allograft function and survival, even if they do not precipitate immediate or hyperacute rejection. (HEPATOLOGY 1992;16:671–681.) Copyright © 1992 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Five patients had complete cadaveric small bowel transplants under FK506 immunosuppression, one as an isolated graft and the other 4 in continuity with a liver. Three were children and two were adults. The five patients are living 2-13 months posttransplantation with complete alimentation by the intestine. The typical postoperative course was stormy, with sluggish resumption of gastrointestinal function. The patient with small intestinal transplantation alone had the most difficult course of the five, including two severe rejections, bacterial and fungal translocation with bacteremia, renal failure with the rejections, and permanent consignment to renal dialysis. The first four patients (studies on the fifth were incomplete) had replacement of the lymphor-eticular cells in the graft lamina propria by their own lymphoreticular cells. Although the surgical and aftercare of these patients was difficult, the eventual uniform success suggests that intestinal transplantation has moved toward becoming a practical clinical service. © 1992 by Williams and Wilkins.

Because of the liver graft's ability to resist cytotoxic antibody-mediated rejection, it has become dogma that the conventional transplant crossmatch used to avoid hyperacute rejection of other organs is irrelevant to the liver. We examined this hypothesis in a consecutive series of adult primary liver recipients treated with FK506 and low-dose steroids. Twenty-five of 231 (10.8%) patients received a liver from a cytotoxic-positive crossmatch donor (more than 50% of donor T lymphocytes were killed by dithiothre-itol-pretreated recipient serum). The outcome was compared with that of 50 negative crossmatch patients who had their transplantations just before and after the crossmatch positive cases. The one-year graft and patient survivals were 56% and 68%, for positive and 82% and 86% for negative crossmatch patients (P=0.004, P=0.03, respectively). The difference between patient and first graft survival was accounted for by retransplantation, which was 4 times more frequent in the positive-crossmatch cases. Histologically, failed allografts obtained at the time of retransplantation revealed a spectrum of pathologic findings related to vascular injury. This study showed a higher difficulty of intraoperative blood product management, a degraded prognosis, and a poorer average quality of ultimate graft function when liver transplantation was performed against positive cytotoxic crossmatches. In such patients for whom crossmatch-negative donors may never be found because of the broad extent and intensity of sensitization, special therapeutic strategies perioperatively must be evolved if results are to improve. © 1992 by Williams and Wilkins.

The early events of liver allograft rejection in untreated rats were studied in the DA to BN rejection strain combination and compared with DA and BN liver isograft recipients. In the liver allografts, T-cell infiltration first occurred at 2 days after transplantation and localized to the portal triads and subjacent to the terminal hepatic venules (THV), regions rich in intensely Ia+ spindle and dendritic-shaped interstitial cells. Double staining showed distinct 'clustering' between donor Ia-positive dendritic shaped cells and W3/25+ infiltrating lymphocytes, or to a lesser extent, 0X8+ cells. The infiltrating mononuclear cells underwent blastogenesis and proliferated in both the triads and THV regions at 3 and 4 days. Donor Ia-positive cells were also noted in the W3/25+ periarterial lymphatic sheath and marginal zone of the recipient spleen 1 day after transplantation. The number of these cells in the spleen peaked at 3 to 4 days, but were no longer detectable by 10 to 12 days. Mitotic activity became evident in these same regions by days 3 and 4. Paracortical blastogenesis (day 2) and proliferation (days 3 and 4) were also noted in the regional lymph nodes of liver allograft recipients, but no donor Ia+ cells were found in the mesenteric nodes or thymus of the allograft recipients. These results demonstrate that sensitization of the recipient lymphoid tissue to liver allografts can occur both peripherally (intragraft) and centrally (spleen and lymph nodes). Passenger leukocytes (donor dendritic cells) are likely the primary stimulators of the rejection reaction. Still, it is probable that other pathways of sensitization exist.