Search

Background. Easy accessibility of psychosocial care is recommended for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their families. Objective. The study aimed to evaluate the availability of psychological care and its associations with glycemic control in centers from the multinational SWEET (Better control in Pediatric and Adolescent diabeteS: Working to crEate CEnTers of Reference) registry. Subjects. Centers participating in SWEET (n = 112) were invited to complete a structured online survey, designed for the study, regarding their psychology service. Methods. Linear/logistic regression models adjusted for several confounders were used to determine the patient’s HbA1c (mmol/mol) and odds ratios (ORs) for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and severe hypoglycemia (SH) related to survey responses. Results. 76 (68%) centers with relevant data in the SWEET database responded to the survey. Psychological services were provided in 89% of the centers. The availability of psychological service in centers was associated with a slightly lower HbA1c of the patients (72 (62–82) vs. 67 (57–78) mmol/mol, ) and significantly lower odds for DKA (1.8 (1.1–2.9), ). Conclusions. Most centers from the SWEET registry offered some form of structured psychological care, consistent with the recommendations of easy access to psychosocial care for children and adolescents with T1D and their families. The main benefit of this psychological care appears to be in the incidence of DKA between centers. The study data also continues to emphasize the importance of treatment targets in shaping the outcomes of pediatric diabetes care. These findings should inform health-service planners and the diabetes community of the importance of mental healthcare in multidisciplinary diabetes teams.

Background. Easy accessibility of psychosocial care is recommended for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their families. Objective. The study aimed to evaluate the availability of psychological care and its associations with glycemic control in centers from the multinational SWEET (Better control in Pediatric and Adolescent diabeteS: Working to crEate CEnTers of Reference) registry. Subjects. Centers participating in SWEET (n = 112) were invited to complete a structured online survey, designed for the study, regarding their psychology service. Methods. Linear/logistic regression models adjusted for several confounders were used to determine the patient’s HbA1c (mmol/mol) and odds ratios (ORs) for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and severe hypoglycemia (SH) related to survey responses. Results. 76 (68%) centers with relevant data in the SWEET database responded to the survey. Psychological services were provided in 89% of the centers. The availability of psychological service in centers was associated with a slightly lower HbA1c of the patients (72 (62–82) vs. 67 (57–78) mmol/mol, ) and significantly lower odds for DKA (1.8 (1.1–2.9), ). Conclusions. Most centers from the SWEET registry offered some form of structured psychological care, consistent with the recommendations of easy access to psychosocial care for children and adolescents with T1D and their families. The main benefit of this psychological care appears to be in the incidence of DKA between centers. The study data also continues to emphasize the importance of treatment targets in shaping the outcomes of pediatric diabetes care. These findings should inform health-service planners and the diabetes community of the importance of mental healthcare in multidisciplinary diabetes teams.