Search

Background: To evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy, in vivo purging and high-dose therapy with autotransplant. Patients and methods: Sixty-four patients were enrolled in the trial. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were the in vivo purging effect on stem-cell harvest and the impact of molecular response on the outcome. Results: At enrollment, 59% of patients were PCR+ for bcl-2 rearrangement in bone marrow (PCR-informative). After the immunochemotherapy, before mobilization, 97% obtained complete response or partial response and 87% of patients informative for bcl-2 were molecularly negative. Sixty-one patients proceeded to in vivo purging and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization with rituximab and high-dose AraC. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 16.6 × 106/kg. Of 33 PCR-informative patients, the harvests resulted in PCR- in all. Fifty-eight patients received high-dose therapy and autotransplant of in vivo purged PBSC. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 41 patients are in complete remission. Five-year PFS is 59%. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients with advanced relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy, in vivo purging and autotransplant may obtain long-lasting PFS. In bcl-2-positive patients, in vivo purging allows the harvest of lymphoma-free PBSC. Absence of the bcl-2 rearrangement after autotransplant is associated with persistent clinical remission.

Systematic data on the ability of pegfilgrastim to mobilize stem cells after chemotherapy are scarce. We evaluated the efficacy of a single 6mg dose of pegfilgrastim for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in aggressive lymphoma patients. Between July 2004 and October 2005, 17 aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and 11 poor-risk Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with cycles containing cisplatin-aracytin. At the end of chemotherapy, the patients received 6mg of pegfilgrastim. Duration of grade 4 neutropenia, adverse events, time to neutrophil recovery, peak and harvest of CD34+ cells were recorded. Twenty-seven out of 28 patients harvested a median of 17.3 × 106/CD34+ cells (range 2.5-28.9) after a median of 9 days (range 8-12 days), with a single apheresis procedure in 25 cases. All patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia, median duration 3 days. The only adverse event was mild bone pain. To date, 13 patients have been autografted with a median of 15.4 × 106 CD34+ pegfilgrastim-mobilized cells per kg (range 2.5-28.9) with rapid and sustained engraftment. Mobilization, harvesting and autografting of pegfilgrastim-mobilized PBC can be successfully achieved in pretreated patients with aggressive lymphoma.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of an early intensification programme including chemotherapy (CHT), autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (MLCL) with sclerosis presenting with adverse prognostic factors. Between 1993 and 1999, 19 patients with MLCL were referred to our institution. Four patients were classified as low risk according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (AA-IPI). Fifteen (79%) were categorised in the high-intermediate or high risk group and were considered eligible for ASCT. Induction therapy consisted of VACOP-B (etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) for 12 weeks. After induction therapy the four low risk patients achieved a complete remission (CR) and did not undergo ASCT. Of the 15 poor risk patients, five achieved CR, seven partial remission (PR), and three showed refractory disease (RD). All these patients received mobilising therapy consisting of high-dose cyclophosphamide. After peripheral stem cell (PSC) collection, to obtain a greater tumor mass reduction before transplantation, the seven patients in PR underwent further treatment with high-dose etoposide and those with RD received two cycles of DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin). At the time of ASCT, seven patients were in CR, six in PR and two had RD. After transplantation using BEAM as preparative regimen, all patients but one achieved a CR. Seven patients with minimal (<25%) residual mass at computed tomography scan received further mediastinal RT even if they had a negative Ga67 scan. At a median follow-up of 35 months from transplantation the disease free survival is 93%. The outcome following this programme of early intensification in poor prognosis MLCL results in a high incidence of durable remissions even in patients with refractory disease.

Options for relapsed/refractory indolent lymphoma include chemotherapy, immunotherapy and high-dose therapy with autologous support. The best combination of these approaches, however, is not defined. We treated 10 patients with relapsed/refractory follicular (n = 7) or mantle cell lymphoma (n = 3) using chemotherapy, immunotherapy, high-dose therapy and autotransplant in a sequence of four phases, each designed to play a specific role in tumour eradication. After the debulking with VACOP-B (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin) (phase 1), 9/10 patients responded but none achieved a molecular response. After the immuno-chemotherapy phase, which combined Rituximab with vincristine and cyclophosphamide, seven patients were in complete response (CR) and three in good partial response (PR), and all those with a molecular marker of disease showed a disappearance of the signal from marrow and blood. Phase 3, which coupled high-dose cytarabine with Rituximab, was effective in mobilizing an adequate number of progenitor cells that were polymerase chain reaction negative in all informative cases. Phase 4 consisted of high-dose therapy with autologous support followed by two doses of Rituximab. Autograft was performed in nine patients. The haematopoietic recovery was as expected. This sequence of chemotherapy, immuno-chemotherapy, stem cell mobilization with in vivo purging and autotransplant, organized in four blocks of treatment, was simple to administer and devoid of toxic effects. It permits rapid attainment of clinical and molecular response and enables the harvest of lymphoma-free peripheral blood progenitor cells even in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory disease.