Search

Climate change has emerged as a major threat to biodiversity, but there have been few assessments of variability in sensitivity to climate across species’ ranges. We examined the sensitivity of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), a common, commercially important tree species found throughout the western United States, to climate variability using tree rings mostly from the International Tree Ring Data Bank (161 chronologies) and multiple climate products for 1930–1979. We compared interannual tree ring variation to water-year precipitation (wy ppt), May-July vapor pressure deficit (MJJ VPD), April-July precipitation (AMJJ ppt) and average winter (Dec-Feb) minimum temperature (winter tmn). We mapped growth-climate correlations for each variable and applied hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis to identify five main groups of climate sensitivities, one of which contained mostly climate-insensitive populations. Ponderosa pine growth was positively correlated with wy ppt and AMJJ ppt and negatively correlated with MJJ VPD throughout its range, but sensitivities were greater in the Southern Rockies and Northern Great Plains than in Pacific and Southwestern populations. Sensitivities to winter tmn were weaker than responses to other climate variables, but Pacific and interior populations mostly demonstrated positive and negative responses, respectively. In summary, our analyses revealed the general pattern that interior populations of ponderosa pine were more climate-sensitive than Pacific populations, but there is considerable heterogeneity in sensitivity throughout the species’ range. Sensitivities to climate variables were related to position along corresponding climate gradients for all variables except MJJ VPD, but the unevenness of these relationships suggests a role of local adaptation. Our results illustrate the variation in climate response for a uniquely wide-ranging species and suggest that “leading” and “trailing” range edge concepts can oversimplify patte

Climate change has emerged as a major threat to biodiversity, but there have been few assessments of variability in sensitivity to climate across species’ ranges. We examined the sensitivity of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), a common, commercially important tree species found throughout the western United States, to climate variability using tree rings mostly from the International Tree Ring Data Bank (161 chronologies) and multiple climate products for 1930–1979. We compared interannual tree ring variation to water-year precipitation (wy ppt), May-July vapor pressure deficit (MJJ VPD), April-July precipitation (AMJJ ppt) and average winter (Dec-Feb) minimum temperature (winter tmn). We mapped growth-climate correlations for each variable and applied hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis to identify five main groups of climate sensitivities, one of which contained mostly climate-insensitive populations. Ponderosa pine growth was positively correlated with wy ppt and AMJJ ppt and negatively correlated with MJJ VPD throughout its range, but sensitivities were greater in the Southern Rockies and Northern Great Plains than in Pacific and Southwestern populations. Sensitivities to winter tmn were weaker than responses to other climate variables, but Pacific and interior populations mostly demonstrated positive and negative responses, respectively. In summary, our analyses revealed the general pattern that interior populations of ponderosa pine were more climate-sensitive than Pacific populations, but there is considerable heterogeneity in sensitivity throughout the species’ range. Sensitivities to climate variables were related to position along corresponding climate gradients for all variables except MJJ VPD, but the unevenness of these relationships suggests a role of local adaptation. Our results illustrate the variation in climate response for a uniquely wide-ranging species and suggest that “leading” and “trailing” range edge concepts can oversimplify patte

A crucial gap exists between the static nature of the United States' existing protected areas and the dynamic impacts of 21st century stressors, such as habitat loss and fragmentation and climate change. Connectivity is a valuable element for bridging that gap and building the ecological resilience of existing protected areas. However, creating terrestrial connectivity by designing individual migration corridors across fragmented landscapes is arguably untenable at a national scale. We explore the potential for use of riverine corridors in a Riparian Connectivity Network (RCN) as a potential contributor to a more resilient network of protected areas. There is ample scientific support for the conservation value of riparian areas, including their habitat, their potential to connect environments, and their ecosystem services. Our spatial analysis suggests that they could connect protected areas and have a higher rate of conservation management than terrestrial lands. Our results illustrate that the spatial backbone for an RCN is already in place, and existing policies favor riparian area protection. Furthermore, existing legal and regulatory goals may be better served if governance requirements and incentives are aligned with conservation efforts focused on riparian connectivity, as part of a larger landscape connectivity strategy. While much research on the effectiveness of riparian corridors remains to be done, the RCN concept provides a way to improve connectivity among currently protected areas. With focused attention, increased institutional collaboration, and improved incentives, these pieces could coalesce into a network of areas for biological conservation.

A crucial gap exists between the static nature of the United States' existing protected areas and the dynamic impacts of 21st century stressors, such as habitat loss and fragmentation and climate change. Connectivity is a valuable element for bridging that gap and building the ecological resilience of existing protected areas. However, creating terrestrial connectivity by designing individual migration corridors across fragmented landscapes is arguably untenable at a national scale. We explore the potential for use of riverine corridors in a Riparian Connectivity Network (RCN) as a potential contributor to a more resilient network of protected areas. There is ample scientific support for the conservation value of riparian areas, including their habitat, their potential to connect environments, and their ecosystem services. Our spatial analysis suggests that they could connect protected areas and have a higher rate of conservation management than terrestrial lands. Our results illustrate that the spatial backbone for an RCN is already in place, and existing policies favor riparian area protection. Furthermore, existing legal and regulatory goals may be better served if governance requirements and incentives are aligned with conservation efforts focused on riparian connectivity, as part of a larger landscape connectivity strategy. While much research on the effectiveness of riparian corridors remains to be done, the RCN concept provides a way to improve connectivity among currently protected areas. With focused attention, increased institutional collaboration, and improved incentives, these pieces could coalesce into a network of areas for biological conservation.