Search

Background: Worldwide, there is limited knowledge regarding women’s views of future fertility in relation to contraceptive use. Few studies include material where women share their experiences at peer-written public domain websites, in spite of a larger portion of women discontinuing use of contraceptives. The objective of this study was to explore women’s experiences of contraceptive methods based on data gathered from individual blog posts. Methods: Explorative qualitative study including 123 individual blog posts as the data source analysed with inductive thematic analysis. Results: Two themes were identified. Theme 1, ‘Seeking control over reproduction and optimise fertility’ including the sub-themes; Having the possibility to decide if, and when, to become pregnant, The value of effective contraceptive methods and the impact of women’s sexuality, A wish to understand the body’s normal fertility function and Limited knowledge—sharing information about the menstrual cycle during counselling and Theme 2, ‘Making the complex decision on their own’ including the sub- themes; Limited or subpar guidance in counselling and need for information from social media, Relational and environmental factors influencing contraceptive decision making and Considering beneficial effects and fears of adverse health effects when using hormonal contraceptive methods. Conclusions: During counselling, women desired an extended dialogue regarding effectiveness, health effects of different methods and an increased understanding of their menstrual cycle. Insufficient understanding of contraceptive methods can lead to use of methods not providing the expected level of protection. Hormonal contraceptives, especially Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) were believed to inhibit fertility long after ending treatment.

Background: Among all women who experienced an abortion in Sweden 2017, 45% had previously underwent at least one abortion. This phenomenon of increasing rates of repeat abortions stimulated efforts to improve contraceptive services through a Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) with user involvement. The participating teams had difficulty in coordinating access post-abortion to the most effective contraception, Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), during the eight-month QIC. This prompted questions about the pace of change in contraceptive services post-abortion. The aim of the study is to evaluate the evolution and impact of QIC changes regarding patient outcomes, system performance and professional development over 12 months after a QIC designed to enhance contraceptive services in the context of abortion. Methods: This follow-up case study involves three multi-professional teams from abortion services at three hospitals in Sweden, which participated in a QIC during 2017. We integrated qualitative data on the evolution of changes and quantitative data regarding the monthly proportion of women initiating LARC, analysed in statistical control charts from before the QIC up until 12 months after its conclusion. Results: Teams A and B increased the average proportion of women who initiated LARC within 30 days post abortion in the 12 months after the QIC; Team A 16–25%; Team B 20–34%. Team C achieved more than 50% in individual months but not consistently in the Post-QIC period. Elusive during the QIC, they now could offer timely appointments for women to initiate LARC more frequently. Team members reported continued focus on how to create trustful relationships when counseling women. They described improved teamwork, leadership support and impact on organizing appointments for initiating LARC following the QIC. Conclusions: QIC teams further improved women’s timely access to LARC post abortion through continued changes in services 12 months after the QIC, d

BACKGROUND: Despite knowledge of the adverse health effects of passive smoking, children are still being exposed. Children's nurses play an important role in tobacco preventive work through dialogue with parents aimed at identifying how children can be protected from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure. The study describes the experiences of Child Health Care (CHC) nurses when using the validated instrument SiCET (Smoking in Children's Environment Test) in dialogue with parents. METHOD: In an intervention in CHC centres in south-eastern Sweden nurses were invited to use the SiCET. Eighteen nurses participated in focus group interviews. Transcripts were reviewed and their contents were coded into categories by three investigators using the method described for focus groups interviews. RESULTS: The SiCET was used in dialogue with parents in tobacco preventive work and resulted in focused discussions on smoking and support for behavioural changes among parents. The instrument had both strengths and limitations. The nurses experienced that the SiCET facilitated dialogue with parents and gave a comprehensive view of the child's ETS exposure. This gave nurses the possibility of taking on a supportive role by offering parents long-term help in protecting their child from ETS exposure and in considering smoking cessation. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the SiCET supports nurses in their dialogue with parents on children's ETS exposure at CHC. There is a need for more clinical use and evaluation of the SiCET to determine its usefulness in clinical practice under varying circumstances.