Search

During class, taking notes helps the encoding process, especially when students reformulate what is presented. After class, notes can be used for revision. Previous studies, mostly conducted in laboratory contexts, showed that note-taking on paper seems to be more efficient than on computer, probably because students are more likely to reformulate on paper. The originality of this study is to investigate students’ perceptions and strategies depending on their note-taking method during but also after class. Data of 108 students showed that students on paper (30%) declare making more reformulations and less multitasking that students on computer (70%). After class, review sheets are written for a large majority of the students on paper, whatever the method they used during class. These results suggest that even if computer is the most used method during class, paper is still used after class, and with paper are associated better strategies.

How did monolingual bias emerge and why does it persist? What are the epistemologies concerning human language? How do language and languages develop? What do the terms monolingual, bilingual, and multilingual mean? What does “typical” language development entail? What constitutes “atypical” language development? To answer these questions, this paper foregrounds that language is a human cognitive skill for communication, and that Anglo-American and European notions of language diversity, monolingualism, bilingualism, and multilingualism disseminate monolingual bias. Monolingual bias extends to educational and clinical contexts where children from bi/multilingual households and/or communities face inappropriate scrutiny when language practitioners assess and support them based on normative monolingual expectations or standards. Monolingual bias is then linked to conceptual issues on “typical” and “atypical” language development. Ultimately, this paper attempts to explain why Anglo-American and European notions of bi/multilingualism are less relevant for most, if not all, of the world’s multilingual contexts, especially in the Philippines.

Since the landmark paper of Spivey et al. (2005), there has been an explosion in the use of continuous trajectories for studying decision-making. In these studies, the participant makes their decision by reaching to a target. By extracting trajectory-based measures, it is possible to observe how the decision unfolds over time. However, studies have shown that these trajectories may not continuously track the decision-making process, but rather result from several discrete submovements executed intermittently. Due to this, the conclusions of papers using purely kinematic measures may be affected by these motor control properties. This study presents simulations of trajectories using human motor control models and demonstrates the relationship between non-decision-related parameters and outcome measures typically used. We also comment on the implications of these findings for using kinematic measures in decision-making and make recommendations for how the decision variable can be more appropriately sampled.

This paper introduces Waymaking, a philosophy that defines cognition by the trajectories of an agent’s movement through its ongoing encounter, whereby those trajectories are themselves dynamic patterns of nested (i.e., whole-body, neural) spatiotemporal movement. Here, an agent’s encounter incudes all realms traditionally named mental, physical, and virtual, distinguishing these by their affordances and sensory landscapes relative to the agent-base. Recent research on the hippocampal formation and entorhinal cortex has opened a way for cognition to be understood as trajectories within nested landscapes: We can now posit knowledge-acquisition, remembering, and spatiotemporal navigation as a common process through statistically diverse clustered regularities. This paper formulates these findings into a general framework that can be used heuristically to provide a practical definition of cognition applicable across disciplines and species, thus alleviating stubborn dichotomies such as those at the heart of the so-called mind-body problem and arguments around potential plant or animal cognition.

The aim of this paper is to import basic concepts from information theory into the epistemological debate about probabilistic measures of coherence. Rather than putting forward and defending a new measure, this paper will sketch an account of `external' coherence, which will be defined as a relation between a target variable of interest, sources containing (more or less) information about the target, and a rule or theoretical hypothesis that postulates the relevant connections between source and target. Relations with and potential insights for standard notions of coherence in formal epistemology are explored. More generaly, the paper explores the potential benefits of applying information theory to the epistemological debate about coherence.

People tend to avoid wasting resources, but little is known about when this emerges in development. Though young children are often wasteful with food and other items, previous work suggests that children consider waste in other judgments. Here, we examined if children anticipate that others should minimize waste. In two experiments (total N = 195), children chose which of two foods someone should eat (Experiment 1; 3-7-year-olds) or two papers someone should make a snowflake with (Experiment 2; 5-year-olds). One of the options would result in minimal waste (i.e., a small food/paper) while the other would result in greater waste (i.e., a large food/paper). Children did not anticipate that others would choose smaller foods, however, at around five years they predicted that others would choose smaller paper. These findings contribute to our knowledge of the development of waste aversion and may extend our understanding of waste aversion as a form of efficiency.

The lexica of natural languages are ambiguous, but the de- gree of ambiguity is unequal between words. Some words have more meanings than others. However, the exact prop- erties that favor some words over others when acquiring a new meaning are not very well understood. In recent years, several studies suggested that some words gain more meanings than others based on selection for efficient communication, which could explain the correlation between meaning and frequency discovered by Zipf (Piantadosi, Tily, & Gibson, 2012; Gib- son et al., 2019). The object of this study is to assess the role of selection in the meaning-frequency correlation using a neu- tral model that yields a meaning-frequency correlation without selection pressures. We provide a model where words gain additional meanings through reuse. In the neutral model pre- sented in this paper, words are chosen to be reused at random, independently of their frequency, hence there is no selection mechanism favoring efficient communication. Unlike previous attempts to introduce null models of the meaning-frequency correlation (Caplan, Kodner, & Yang, 2020; Trott & Bergen, 2020), it truly does not rely on selection for frequency. We show that statistical regularities related to ambiguity, such as Zipf’s meaning-frequency correlation, can arise in conditions when words are not undergoing any selective pressures. This model has the additional property of matching word frequency distributions of natural languages. It can provide the baseline against which the presence of selection for efficient communi- cation in natural languages can be assessed.

Embodied simulation hypothesis supposes that language processing involves the activation of perceptual-motor systems to recreate the described scene (Bergen, 2012, 2019). The paper investigates whether and how adolescent second language (L2) learners’ online processing of prepositions engages mental simulation. Specifically, the study examines whether any observed mental simulation effect was modulated by prepositions, abstractness of senses, and Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA). 40 Chinese adolescents completed a diagram-picture matching task followed by a semantic priming task in English, where participants saw a diagrammatic prime and made phrasal acceptability judgement. Results showed a compatibility effect of schematic diagrams on adolescent L2 English learners’ accuracy rates (ARs) of processing prepositional phrases (PPs), while response times (RTs) results did not reveal mental simulation effects. The findings suggest that schematic diagrams could serve as effective perceptual cues to prime adolescent L2 learners’ processing of schema-compatible English PPs by improving judgement accuracy but not processing speed.

In this paper, we study human sequential behavior by integrating cognitive, evolutionary, and computational approaches. Our work centers around the emergence of shared vocabularies in the Embodied Communication Game (ECG). Here, participant pairs solve a shared task without access to conventional means of communication, enforcing the emergence of a new communication system. This problem is solved typically by negotiating a shared set of sequential signals that acquire meaning through interactions. Individual differences in Personal Need for Structure (PNS) have been found to influence how this process develops. We trained deep neural networks to mimic the emergence of new communicative systems and used hyperparameter optimization to approximate latent human cognitive variables to explain human behavior. We demonstrate that models based on bidirectional LSTM networks are better at capturing human behavior than unidirectional LSTM networks. This suggests that human sequence processing in the ECG is influenced by expected future states. The approximated variables cannot explain the differences in PNS, but we do provide evidence suggesting that random and uncertainty-directed exploration strategies are combined to develop optimal behavior.

Causal perception is a cornerstone of early cognitive development. A large database of research attests to the fact that infant causal perception emerges between 6 and 10 months of age. However, it remains unknown how infants learn about the causal properties of more realistic categories such as people and objects. For example, how do infants learn that people can cause other people to act and behave at a distance, whereas inanimate objects require contact to move and act? One answer to this question is that this knowledge is present from birth or shortly thereafter and is underpinned by core knowledge systems. An alternative perspective maintains that infants acquire this knowledge via domain-general associative learning. The goal of the present paper is to demonstrate that this alternative perspective—implemented in a connectionist computational model—is sufficient to explain infants’ developing knowledge about people and object causal action.