Search

Objective: To assess whether an adjunctive therapy of Sodium Tanshinone II A Sulfonate Injection (STS) is effective and safe in improving clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)., Methods: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Knowledge Infrastructure Databases (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) and Wanfang Database up to August 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing STS with placebo or no additional treatments on the basis of standard conventional medicine therapies were included. The outcomes were all-cause mortality, major acute cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiac function and inflammatory factors. The risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane Handbook was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included trials. Revman 5.3 software was used for data analyses., Results: A total of 22 RCTs involving 1,873 participants were included. All of the trials used STS as adjunctive treatment to standard conventional medicine therapy. Due to the poor quality of methodologies of most trials, only limited evidence showed that a combination of STS with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolytic therapy (TT) might be more effective on reduction of all cause death rate than TT alone [risk ratio (RR) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.87] or PCI alone (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.36). The results of 6 trials comparing STS plus TT with TT alone showed that the addition of STS significantly reduced the incidence of cardiac shock (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.86), heart failure (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.83) and arrhythmia (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.46). STS combined with TT also showed a superior effect on cardiac function and inflammatory factor. No severe adverse event was reported related to STS., Conclusions: As an adjunctive therapy, STS combined with standard conventional medicine seems to be more effective on all-cause mortality or MACEs than conventional medicine treatment alone with less side effects. However, we cannot make a firm conclusion due to low quality of inclusion trials. Well-designed trials with high methodological quality are needed to validate the effect of STS for CHD patients.

Introduction: Acupuncture as one of the alternative therapies for insomnia is widely used in Asia and increasingly employed in western countries. Objectives: To provide updated evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for primary insomnia. Methods: A comprehensive literature search in 11 databases was conducted from January 2008 to October 2017. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias independently. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. According to predefined protocol, we combined data in meta-analysis and performed trial sequential analysis when appropriate. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was also conducted to assess the quality of evidence. Results: A total of 73 RCTs involving 5533 participants were analyzed. The pooled results showed better effect from real acupuncture than no treatment (mean difference [MD] -5.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.85 to -4.31, I 2  = 0%, p  < 0.00001, 2 trials, fixed effect model, 105 participants) on reducing Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores with "very low quality" evidence. Acupuncture plus drugs showed better improvement than drugs alone on decreasing the PSQI total scores (MD -3.17, 95% CI -4.74 to -1.61, I 2  = 72%, 4 trials, random-effects model (REM), p  < 0.0001, 253 participants, low quality). Similar benefit favored acupuncture compared with no treatment (MD -8.46, 95% CI -9.59 to -7.33, I 2  = 0%, p  < 0.00001, 2 trials, 65 participants). Acupuncture showed more benefit than estazolam on PSQI (with enough statistical power). Athens Insomnia Scale (MD -1.64, 95% CI -2.40 to -0.89, I 2  = 0%, p  < 0.0001, 3 trials, fixed-effects model, 180 participants) or SPIEGEL (MD -2.86, 95% CI -3.54 to -2.18, p  < 0.00001, I 2  = 0%, 5 trials, fixed-effects model, 326 participants) with "very low-quality" evidence. Furthermore, low-quality evidence showed less adverse events from acupuncture than western medications (risk ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.48, I 2  = 56%, p  < 0.0001, 11 trials, REM, 914 participants). Publication bias was likely present based on the PSQI total scores. Conclusions: The summary estimates indicate that acupuncture might result in improvement than no treatment on PSQI scores and appears safe. However, the quality of the evidence is varied from very low to low due to the potential risk of bias and inconsistency among included trials. Further large sample size and rigorously designed RCTs are still needed.

Dolittle algorithm is a numerical analysis method with high accuracy and low cost. In the present paper, the Dolittle algorithm is introduced into chemometrics. Dolittle multivariate correction method was put forward for the first time and was applied to solve the problem of overlapped spectra of multi-components. In addition, Dolittle multivariate correction method was used to resolve the problem of spectrum of mixed system of benzene homologs. The result shows that the Dolittle multivariate correction method is superior to the K-matrix method. The relative standard deviation of the Dolittle multivariate correction method is from -6. 35% to 8. 70%, while the relative standard deviation of K-matrix is from -14. 76% to 13. 40%. It was demonstrated that Doolittle algorithm is effective in analytical chemistry.

Aim: To study the synergistic effects of calmodulin (CaM) antagonist O-4-ethoxyl-butyl-berbamine (EBB) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) on hepatoma-22 (H(22)) in vivo., Methods: Hepatoma model was established in 50 Balb/c mice by inoculating H(22) cells (2.5 x 10(6)) subcutaneously into the right backs of the mice. These mice were divided into 5 groups, and treated with saline only, PLD only, doxorubicin (Dox) only, PLD plus EBB and Dox plus EBB, respectively. In the treatment groups, mice were given 5 intravenous of PLD or Dox on days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12. The first dosage of PLD or Dox was 4.5 mg/kg, the other 4 injections was 1 mg/kg. EBB (5 mg/kg) was coadministered with PLD or Dox in the corresponding groups. The effect of drugs on the life spans of hepatoma-bearing mice and tumor response to the drugs were recorded. Dox levels in the hepatoma cells were measured by a fluorescence assay. Light microscopy was performed to determine the histopathological changes in the major organs of these tumor-bearing mice. The MTT method was used to analyze the effect of Dox or PLD alone, Dox in combination with EBB, or PLD in combination with EBB on the growth of H(22) cells in an in vitro experiment., Results: EBB (5 mg/kg) significantly augmented the antitumor activity of Dox or PLD, remarkably prolonged the median survival time. The median survival time was 18.2 d for control group, but 89.2 d for PLD+EBB group and 70.1 d for Dox+EBB group, respectively. However, Dox alone did not show any remarkable antitumor activity, and the median survival time was just 29.7 d. Addition of EBB to Dox or PLD significantly increased the level of Dox in H(22) cells in vivo. Moreover, EBB diminished liver toxicity of Dox and PLD. In vitro, EBB reduced the IC50 value of Dox or PLD on H(22) cells from 0.050+/-0.006 mg/L and 0.054+/-0.004 mg/L to 0.012+/-0.002 mg/L and 0.013+/-0.002 mg/L, respectively (P<0.01)., Conclusion: EBB and liposomization could improve the therapeutic efficacy of Dox in liver cancer, while decreasing its liver toxicity.