Search

Purpose: There are no well-recognized guidelines for antiemesis during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for cervical cancer (CC) and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) until now. The study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant combined with tropisetron and dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vomiting during 5 weeks of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly low-dose cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with CC or NPC., Methods: Patients with CC or NPC were scheduled to receive fractionated radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin (25-40 mg/m 2 ) chemotherapy for at least 5 weeks. Patients stratified by tumor type and induction chemotherapy were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive fosaprepitant, tropisetron, and dexamethasone or tropisetron plus dexamethasone as an antiemetic regimen. Efficacy was assessed primarily by the cumulative incidence of emesis after 5 weeks of treatment, and safety by adverse events (AEs)., Results: Between July 2020 and July 2022, 116 patients consented to the study of whom 103 were included in this interim analysis (fosaprepitant group [N = 52] vs control group [N = 51]). The cumulative incidence of emesis at 5 weeks (competing risk analysis) was 25% (95% CI 14.2-37.4) for the fosaprepitant group compared with 59% (95% CI 43.9-71.0) for the control group. There was a significantly lower cumulative risk of emesis in the fosaprepitant group (HR 0.35 [95% CI 0.19-0.64]; p < 0.001). Fosaprepitant was well tolerated as the incidences of adverse events in the two groups were comparable., Conclusion: The addition of fosaprepitant to tropisetron plus dexamethasone significantly reduced the risk of nausea and vomiting during 5 weeks of CCRT in patients with CC or NPC, and fosaprepitant was well tolerated., Trial Registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on October 3, 2022, number NCT05564286., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The relationship between the systemic immune inflammatory index (SII) and the prognosis of hypertensive patients is unclear. This study aims to explore the association of SII with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with hypertension., Methods: This study included 8524 adults with hypertension from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2011-2018, and followed for survival through December 31, 2019. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the associations between SII and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Restricted cubic spline, piecewise linear regression, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also used., Results: During a median follow-up of 4.58 years, 872 all-cause deaths occurred. After adjusting for covariates, higher SII was significantly associated with an elevated risk of CVD mortality. There was a 102% increased risk of CVD mortality per one-unit increment in natural log-transformed SII (lnSII) (P < 0.001). Consistent results were also observed when SII was examined as categorical variable (quartiles). The associations of SII with all-cause and cancer mortality were detected as U-shaped with threshold values of 5.97 and 6.18 for lnSII respectively. Below thresholds, higher SII was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR=0.79, 95%CI=0.64-0.97) and cancer mortality (HR=0.73, 95%CI=0.53-1.00). Above thresholds, SII was significantly positive associated with all-cause mortality (HR=1.93, 95%CI=1.55-2.40) and cancer mortality (HR=1.93, 95%CI=1.22-3.05). The results were robust in subgroup and sensitivity analyses., Conclusion: Higher SII (either as a continuous or categorical variable) were significantly associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality. The U-shaped associations were observed between SII and all-cause and cancer mortality., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Cao, Li, Zhang, Qiu, Li, Ma, Yan, Li and Han.)

Both diet and inflammation are strongly associated with hypertension. However, the relationship between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and the prognosis of hypertensive patients over 65 years of age is unclear. The objective of this study is to investigate the correlation between DII and all-cause mortality in older adults with hypertension. Data were obtained from the 2011−2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and followed for survival through December 31, 2019. DII was calculated by the 24 h dietary history interview. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the associations. A total of 2531 participants were finally included. During a median follow-up of 4.33 years, 471 participants were determined as all-cause mortality. After adjusting for confounding factors, DII was positively correlated with the risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01−1.16). Compared with the anti-inflammatory diet group (DII < 0), the pro-inflammatory diet group (DII > 0) had a 54% increased risk of all-cause death (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.13−2.10). The results were robust in subgroup and sensitivity analyses. DII was positively correlated with the all-cause mortality of elderly hypertensive patients. The results provided an aid to dietary evaluation in the nonpharmacologic management of hypertension., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objectives: In this study, we extend previous research by re-examining the ethnic density effects on mental health of British ethnic minorities and exploring how the relationship varies across generations at a lower geographic scale Lower Super Output Areas (official census geographical classification designed for the consistent reporting of local statistics). Methods: We used random intercept logistic multilevel models to analyze the second wave (2010-2011) of the United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS). Results: The results show that after controlling for neighborhood deprivation, respondents' socio-demographic characteristics, duration of stay in a neighborhood and moving preference, ethnic concentration has a detrimental effect on mental health for Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, black Caribbeans and black Africans. Moreover, the results show that the detrimental effects are particularly pronounced for the first-generation Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Indians compared to their second-generation counterparts. Conclusions: Policy interventions to ameliorate ethnic disadvantages in mental health may need to be more targeted to first-generation South Asian minorities living in ethnically clustered areas, and that previous research overlooking migration generation may conceal important internal differences within British ethnic minorities.