1. Tracheoplasty should be proactively considered in the surgical strategy for treating the ring-sling complex.
- Author
-
Du XW, Wang PH, Wang H, Zhang DW, Chen Q, Xu ZW, Zhu LM, Lu ZH, and Wang SM
- Abstract
Objective: To examine the safety and effectiveness of proactive tracheoplasty for pediatric ring-sling complex., Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 304 children who were diagnosed with a ring-sling complex and underwent surgery at 3 cardiac centers in China between January 2010 and June 2023. The children were categorized into 3 surgical groups: concurrent sling and tracheal surgery (group A; n = 258), staged sling and tracheal surgery (group B; n = 25), and sling-only surgery (group C; n = 21). We compared perioperative clinical characteristics, tracheal morphology changes, and outcomes across the 3 groups., Results: The median age of the children was 1.2 years (interquartile range, [IQR], 0.7-1.9 years). The anomalous tracheobronchial arborization rates were higher in group A (52.5%) and group B (60.0%) compared to group C (15.0%). The preoperative narrow-wide ratio (NWR) was lower in groups A and B than in group C, with values of 0.44 (IQR, 0.35-0.52), 0.44 (IQR, 0.33-0.59), and 0.68 (IQR, 0.54-0.72), respectively (P < .001). Preoperative subcarina angles were similar among the groups (P = .54). After specific surgeries, the NWR and subcarina angle were improved significantly in groups A and B but not in group C. There were 7 in-hospital deaths and 2 postdischarge deaths. Respiratory symptoms improved in groups A and B, but 7 children in group C remained in respiratory dysfunction. Six children presented with residual stenosis of the left pulmonary artery., Conclusions: Concurrent sling and tracheal surgeries for children with the ring-sling complex are safe and effective and are especially preferable for those with NWR ≤0.6, long-segment or diffuse tracheal stenosis, anomalous tracheobronchial arborization, and pronounced respiratory symptoms., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF