Search

Background: Inadvertent intra-arterial injection of sclerosants is an uncommon adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. This complication can result in significant tissue or limb loss and significant long-term morbidity., Objectives: To provide recommendations for diagnosis and immediate management of an unintentional intra-arterial injection of sclerosing agents., Methods: An international and multidisciplinary expert panel representing the endorsing societies and relevant specialities reviewed the published biomedical, scientific and legal literature and developed the consensus-based recommendations., Results: Actual and suspected cases of an intra-arterial sclerosant injection should be immediately transferred to a facility with a vascular/interventional unit. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is the key investigation to confirm the diagnosis and help select the appropriate intra-arterial therapy for tissue ischaemia. Emergency endovascular intervention will be required to manage the risk of major limb ischaemia. This includes intra-arterial administration of vasodilators to reduce vasospasm, and anticoagulants and thrombolytic agents to mitigate thrombosis. Mechanical thrombectomy, other endovascular interventions and even open surgery may be required. Lumbar sympathetic block may be considered but has a high risk of bleeding. Systemic anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, and platelet inhibitors and modifiers would complement the intra-arterial endovascular procedures. For risk of minor ischaemia, systemic oral anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, vasodilators and antiplatelet treatments are recommended., Conclusion: Inadvertent intra-arterial injection is an adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. Medical practitioners performing sclerotherapy must ensure completion of a course of formal training (specialty or subspecialty training, or equivalent recognition) in the management of venous and lymphatic disorders (phlebology), and be personally proficient in the use of duplex ultrasound in vascular (both arterial and venous) applications, to diagnose and provide image guidance to venous procedure. Expertise in diagnosis and immediate management of an intra-arterial injection is essential for all practitioners performing sclerotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: KG has declared consultancy for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Gore, Philips and Koya, research support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Gore and Philips and speaker for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Philips and Janssen. All other authors have no competing interests or conflicts of interest to declare.

Objective: To identify the effects of patient risk factors and pelvic venous reflux (PVR) patterns on treatment outcomes of Pelvic Vein Embolisation (PVE) for Pelvic Venous Disorder (PeVD)., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort review assessing population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) for women undergoing PVE for PVR January 2017-January 2021. We identified 190 patients who had completed both questionnaires and who had given consent for their information to be used for research (Median age 46, IQR 40-52). The distribution of pathological pelvic venous reflux found on transvaginal duplex ultrasound (TVDUS) was analysed for all patients. Pre- and post-procedure symptom burden scores were studied using a standardised questionnaire protocol. We used inferential univariate non-parametric statistics to describe our data., Results: 190 cases were reviewed; 62.6% (119/190) premenopausal, 11.1% (21/190) perimenopausal, 25.3% (48/190) postmenopausal and menopausal status not documented 1% (2/190). 10.1% (19/188) were nulliparous (average age 34 years; range 20-55 years). There was a statistically significant improvement in all symptoms and in the appearance of varicosities on TVDUS post-PVE ( P < 0.05) of the ovarian vein plexus, uterus plexus, arcuate veins, vaginal wall, peri-urethral, peri-anal, haemorrhoids, labial and proximal thigh. The locations of veins requiring embolisation having demonstrated reflux were analysed; 82.8% (154/186) underwent embolisation of at least one internal iliac vein tributary and ovarian vein embolisation. Age, parity, menopausal status and previous laparoscopy did not affect symptom improvement ( P > 0.05). No significant complications such as coil migration were observed., Conclusions: PVE is an effective treatment for pelvic pain due to PeVD and its diagnosis should not be limited to multiparous women of childbearing age, as a significant proportion of patients who benefited from PVE were either nulliparous and/or postmenopausal., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The rapid development of less invasive and traumatic medical procedures has resulted in a mixture of terms used to describe them, without any agreed definition for each. This is confusing to both medical professionals and patients and can lead to unrealistic patient expectations. The aim of this article is to show the current confused nomenclature and to suggest a new, simple classification based on access and invasiveness (AI) that can be applied to any medical procedure., Methods: We performed an online search for definitions for 'non-invasive', 'non-surgical', 'minimally invasive', 'minimal access', 'pinhole' and 'keyhole'. We then searched peer-reviewed medical papers (PRMPs) and patient facing websites (PFWs) for the following index procedures, to see which of the original 6 terms were used to describe them: transvaginal ultrasound, sclerotherapy for leg veins, botulinum toxin injections, dermal fillers, endovenous thermal ablation and laparoscopic gall bladder removal., Results: We found a wide variety of definitions for each of the initial terms. In both PRMPs and PFWs, there were a variety of terms used for each index procedure (i.e.: transvaginal ultrasound, injections of sclerotherapy, botulinum toxin or dermal fillers being both 'non-invasive' and 'minimally invasive') showing confusion in the classification of procedures. We suggested the 'AI classification' based on access (A - none, B - natural orifice or C - penetrating an epithelial surface) and invasiveness (1 - none, 2 - surface damage, 3 - needle = <21G, 4 - cannula >21G but not a surgical trocar, 5 - surgical trocars or small incisions and 6 - incisions)., Conclusion: The current confusion of terms used for procedures that are less invasive than the open surgical alternatives leads to confusion and possible false patient expectations. We have proposed an AI classification that can be applied easily to any procedure, giving a uniform classification for medical professionals and patients to understand., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.)

Aims: Endovenous microwave ablation (EMWA) is an endovenous thermoablation (EVTA) system to ablate incompetent truncal veins. Early results suggest that EMWA uses more power than endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to get the same results. We aimed to define the parameters for EMWA, which give the same tissue ablation as EVLA, using the validated porcine liver model., Methods: EVLA (1470 nm 600 micron radial fibre) treatments were performed at 6 W, 8 W and 10 W, at pullback speeds of 6, 7, 8 and 9 s/cm, giving Linear Endovenous Energy Densities (LEEDs) between 36 - 90 J/cm. Each combination of power and pullback was repeated 5 times. We then used EMWA in the same model. Powers of 35-75 W and pullback speeds of 4-9 s/cm were used (LEEDs 140-675 J/cm). Ablation tracts from both devices were analysed by 2 blinded observers, noting thermal spread and carbonisation., Results: For each commonly used parameter for EVLA, we identified a range of parameters for EMWA that produced similar tissue ablation in the porcine liver model. To keep the pullback speeds within the usual range, powers of 35-75 W were needed with EMWA, with mean EMWA LEEDs 3.9 - 5.8 times higher than EVLA LEEDs. We found the quicker the pullback speed, the higher the multiple of EMWA LEED we needed to get the same effect., Conclusion: We have identified parameters for EMWA that gave equivalent tissue ablation in the porcine liver model to commonly used parameters used for EVLA. These need to be validated clinically, but as the model used has already been validated against clinical outcome in endovenous thermal ablation, there is little reason to suspect that these results would not be valid. As the power during EMWA is higher than EVLA, EVMA LEEDs are approximately 4-6 times higher than EVLA LEEDs to achieve the same thermal effect on the tissues., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: The aim was to retrieve and analyse the serious adverse events of venous occlusion systems used in cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC) submitted to regulatory agencies., Methods: The Total Product Life Cycle (TPLC) database of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) of the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), and the Yellow Card database of the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) were reviewed. Three Freedom of Information (FOI) requests had to be submitted to the MHRA to obtain data., Results: The TPLC contained 899 reports which included 13 cases of death, 7 strokes, 211 thromboembolic events, and 482 immune reactions. The DAEN recorded three reportable adverse events, and the MHRA recorded seven adverse incidents including one death., Conclusion: CAC is associated with serious adverse events including death. These events are under-reported in the medical literature and only sub-optimally reported to the regulatory agencies., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Endovenous therapy is the first choice management for symptomatic varicose veins in NICE guidelines, with 56-70 000 procedures performed annually in the UK. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a known complication of endovenous therapy, occurring at a rate of up to 3.4%. Despite 73% of UK practitioners administering pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to reduce VTE, no high-quality evidence supporting this practice exists. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis may have clinical and cost benefit in preventing VTE; however, further evidence is needed. This study aims to establish whether when endovenous therapy is undertaken: a single dose or course of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alters the risk of VTE; pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is associated with an increased rate of bleeding events; pharmacological prophylaxis is cost effective., Methods and Analysis: A multi-centre, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT) will recruit 6660 participants from 40 NHS and private sites across the UK. Participants will be randomised to intervention (single dose or extended course of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis plus compression) or control (compression alone). Participants will undergo a lower limb venous duplex ultrasound scan at 21-28 days post-procedure to identify asymptomatic DVT. The duplex scan will be conducted locally by blinded assessors. Participants will be contacted remotely for follow-up at 7 days and 90 days post-procedure. The primary outcome is imaging-confirmed lower limb DVT with or without symptoms or PE with symptoms within 90 days of treatment. The main analysis will be according to the intention-to-treat principle and will compare the rates of VTE at 90 days, using a repeated measures analysis of variance, adjusting for any pre-specified strongly prognostic baseline covariates using a mixed effects logistic regression., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval was granted by Brent Research Ethics Committee (22/LO/0261). Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN18501431., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Linear Endovenous Energy Density (LEED) is the energy used per cm of vein in endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) but does not include time. This study examines the effect of time during EVTA., Method: EVTA was performed in a previously validated porcine liver model. LEEDs of 40, 60, 80 and 100 J/cm, using different powers were repeated 5 times each. Thermal spread, tissue carbonisation and device-tissue sticking during treatment were recorded., Result: LEED positively correlated to thermal spread and carbonisation of the tissue. Power was correlated with carbonisation but not thermal spread. Pullback had no correlations with thermal spread or carbonisation. Catheter sticking found occurred in powers >= 15 W or LEED >= 80 J/cm., Conclusion: LEED is a good measure of EVTA but does not include time. Power, which does include time, correlates with carbonisation and with device-tissue sticking. The power used must be quoted with the LEED.

Introduction: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) using 1470 nm, which targets water as its chromophore, has become the standard endovenous thermal treatment for incompetent truncal veins. Recently, there has been growing interest in the use of 1940 nm, due to the greater absorption by water. This increased absorption has led to claims that, with the longer wavelength, less power is needed to achieve the same biological effect during treatment, resulting in fewer adverse post-operative sequelae., Methods: Review of the current literature comparing 1940 nm and 1470 nm EVLA, which includes both laboratory-based and clinical studies. Reports on the use of 1920 nm were combined with those on 1940 nm., Results: Increased absorption of the longer wavelength by water results in more thermal damage closer to the EVLA device. Thus, there may be an advantage to using the longer wavelength in EVLA of thin-walled veins at low power. However, in saphenous veins, which have thicker walls, there is little evidence that this different energy distribution in the vein wall makes any clinical difference. Reduced pain is likely to be due to reduced power during treatment. This is likely to result in more long-term failures of ablation using 1940 nm., Conclusion: There is a difference in the distribution of thermal damage in the vein wall between EVLA at 1470 nm and 1940 nm. However, there is little evidence of any clinically significant difference when used in incompetent saphenous veins. Clinical studies looking for a difference need to report the size and wall thickness of the treated vein, the power used as well as the energy per centimetre (LEED), and long-term ablation rates in addition to early post-operative pain, induration, paraesthesia and ecchymosis. Also, power loss in different laser / fibre systems and technical differences, such as those that might allow blood to remain in the vein being treated, need to be considered.

This article outlines the current best practice in the management of varicose veins. "Varicose veins" traditionally means bulging veins, usually seen on the legs, when standing. It is now a general term used to describe these bulging veins, and also underlying incompetent veins that reflux and cause the surface varicose veins. Importantly, "varicose veins" is often used for superficial venous reflux even in the absence of visible bulging veins. These can be simply called "hidden varicose veins". Varicose veins usually deteriorate, progressing to discomfort, swollen ankles, skin damage, leg ulcers, superficial venous thrombosis and venous bleeds. Patients with varicose veins and symptoms or signs have a significant advantage in having treatment over conservative treatment with compression stockings or venotropic drugs. Small varicose veins or telangiectasia without symptoms or signs can be treated for cosmetic reasons. However, most have underlying venous reflux from saphenous, perforator or local "feeding veins" and so investigation with venous duplex should be mandatory before treatment. Best practice for investigating leg varicose veins is venous duplex ultrasound in the erect position, performed by a specialist trained in ultrasonography optimally not the doctor who performs the treatment. Pelvic vein reflux is best investigated with transvaginal duplex ultrasound (TVS), performed using the Holdstock-Harrison protocol. In men or women unable to have TVS, venography or cross-sectional imaging is needed. Best practice for treating truncal vein incompetence is endovenous thermal ablation. Increasing evidence suggests that significant incompetent perforating veins should be found and treated by thermal ablation using the transluminal occlusion of perforator (TRLOP) approach, and that incompetent pelvic veins refluxing into symptomatic varicose veins in the genital region or leg should be treated by coil embolisation. Bulging varicosities should be treated by phlebectomy at the time of truncal vein ablation. Monitoring and reporting outcomes is essential for doctors and patients; hence, participation in a venous registry should probably be mandatory., Competing Interests: Mark Steven Whiteley reports being the founder of the College of Phlebology, during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. The author reports no other potential conflicts of interest for this work., (© 2022 Whiteley.)

Current endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) practice favours 1470 nm, as water is a major chromophore for this wavelength. Water has a greater affinity for 1940 nm, leading to claims that lower powers or linear endovenous energy densities (LEEDs) are needed. We compared the thermal spread and carbonisation of EVLA using these two wavelengths, in the porcine liver model. Using the previously validated porcine liver model, we performed 5 treatments, at each power: 2 W, 4 W, 6 W, 8 W and 10 W using a standard pullback of 8 s/cm. This gave LEEDs for each wavelength of 16, 32, 48, 64 and 80 J/cm. Digital images were given random codes and analysed by two blinded observers. Thermal spread was measured using "SketchandCalc" online software and graded carbonisation from 0 (none) to 3 (black carbon tract). There was no significant difference in thermal spread between the two wavelengths at 6 W, 8 W and 10 W. At 2 W, the 1470-nm laser had a significantly increased thermal spread over the 1940 nm. Significantly more carbonisation was found with the 1940-nm laser compared to 1470 nm. In this model, there was no significant difference in thermal spread at powers of 6 W and more. At 2 W and potentially 4 W, 1470 nm showed spread than 1940 nm, due to increased absorption at the device/tissue interface. At powers and LEEDs used for saphenous ablation, we found no evidence to support reduced power or LEED when using 1940 nm. However, 1940 nm may be more advantageous than 1470 nm when ablating small thin-walled veins, near to the skin., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: International guidelines recommend endovenous laser ablation as one of the first-line treatments for truncal venous reflux associated with varicose veins. Clinicians use linear endovenous energy density to measure the energy used during treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the power output from the fiber tip and to see if this changed with use., Methods: We placed 15 mL of water in a thermally insulated 25-mL beaker. Two thermocouples were placed equidistantly adjacent to the laser fiber tip. A 1470-nm laser was fired at 5W for 2 minutes and the temperature change was measured. Three fibers were used on different days to allow the laser to cool for 24 hours between fibers. Each fiber was tested three times in a row. We also tested the "first treatment" effect by comparing the power output when the fiber was fired immediately after the laser was switched on, compared with treatments when the laser had been switched on for 1 hour. To assess whether this was due to the console being "cold" on the first firing of the day, we repeated the experiment having switched on the laser console 1 hour before firing to "prewarm" the console. However, the diode was not fired during this hour. To measure fiber degradation, three runs of the experiment were performed successively before firing the laser continuously for 20 minutes, then three more runs were conducted, resulting in delivery of approximately 10,000 J., Results: The actual power output seemed to be lower than the console suggested. The power output from the first fiber used in a succession of three with the same laser had a significantly lower power output than the following two runs (P = .0004 and P < .0001, respectively). When the laser was prewarmed for 1 hour without firing, no change in this output pattern was noted (P = .293). Fiber degradation was not found in any of the fibers that were tested within the maximum recommended for the fiber (10,000 J)., Conclusions: The first use of a fiber in a treatment session has a significantly lower power output from the treatment tip than subsequent uses, even if the machine is prewarmed and the console displays the same power for each. The authors believe that this phenomenon is due to the diode being less efficient when first used after switching it on. Clinicians need to be aware that the true power output at the fiber tip may not be as indicated by the console display and may be variable during a treatment session., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Successful endovenous thermoablation relies on transmural vein wall ablation. We investigated the pattern of thermal spread and tissue carbonisation from RadioFrequency-induced ThermoTherapy (RFiTT) at different powers and pull back methods, using a porcine liver model., Methods: We used a previously validated in-vitro porcine liver model. Different powers from 5-25 W were used to administer 150 J. We compared continuous and pulsed energy delivery. Length, lateral spread, and total area of thermal damage, together with any tissue carbonisation, was measured using digital analysis software., Results: All experiments used 150 J total energy. Total thermal damage area was smaller with lower power and pulsed energy. Continuous energy caused more tissue carbonisation than pulsed except at 25 W., Conclusion: Reduced thermal damage with lower power or pulsed energy results from cooling due to increased time of treatment. Increasing the power increases tissue carbonisation. Optimal treatment is determined by the highest power used continuously that does not cause tissue carbonisation.

Background: Many patients complain of prominent vertical veins in the center of their forehead, worse when smiling, wrinkling the forehead in bright light, leaning forward, and when vasodilated in heat, when exercising, or with alcohol. Previous attempts to treat these with external laser, sclerotherapy, and phlebectomy have not been successful., Objective: To describe a new method of treating prominent vertical forehead veins and to report the early results., Materials and Methods: We used endovenous laser ablation with a 1470 nm diode laser in 15 patients (F:M 12:3; mean age 38.4 years range 24-69). A bare fiber was used once and a 400-μm single ring radial fiber (Biolitec, Vienna, Austria) in all other cases. Tumescence was placed around the vein and a power of 2 to 3 W with a pullback of 7 to 10 seconds per centimeter., Results: Twelve of the 15 patients (80%) ended up with a good cosmetic result and were satisfied, although 2 needed redo treatment. One patient had minor skin tethering, and 2 (13%) suffered burns-one was the only bare fiber case and the other, the only one where 4 W was used., Conclusion: We present a novel technique to treat prominent vertical forehead veins, with apparently good early results., (Copyright © 2020 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The study aimed to investigate the biologic effects of the 1470-nm endovenous laser (EVL), with a jacketed fiber and a radial fiber, during EVL ablation of an ex vivo dominant extrafascial tributary of the great saphenous vein in our in vitro model by histology and immunohistochemistry., Methods: Ten segments of the dominant extrafascial tributary of the great saphenous vein were harvested by a consultant vascular surgeon from patients during routine varicose vein surgery. Six segments were treated using an ex vivo model of our design by a 1470-nm EVL with a jacketed fiber. The other four segments were also treated by a 1470-nm EVL but with a radial-firing fiber. Each segment was split into five sections and treated at five different linear endovenous energy densities (LEEDs) at 10 W: 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 J/cm. The veins were incubated and subsections collected at 6 and 24 hours after treatment. Subsections were immersed in buffered formalin and taken for histologic and immunohistochemical analysis. Histopathologic analysis was then performed., Results: Treatment with the radial fiber led to a pattern of damage that was more homogeneous than with the jacketed fiber, with no carbonization of tissue present. Significant transmural damage and necrosis were observed at LEEDs of 60 and 80 J/cm in both treatment groups. At the same LEEDs, p53 and caspase 3 analysis showed that transmural cell wall vein death (necrosis or apoptosis) occurred by 6 hours after treatment with both fibers., Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the effects of treatment with a jacketed fiber and a radial fiber in EVL ablation in vitro. Although both fibers caused transmural vein wall cell death at similar LEEDs, the pattern of damage with the radial fiber was more homogeneous. There was no overtreatment of tissue in terms of carbonization after treatment with the radial fiber. Treatment with the jacketed fiber showed carbonization of tissue at the same LEEDs., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives Pelvic vein embolisation is increasing in venous practice for the treatment of conditions associated with pelvic venous reflux. In July 2014, we introduced a local anaesthetic "walk-in walk-out" pelvic vein embolisation service situated in a vein clinic, remote from a hospital. Methods Prospective audit of all patients undergoing pelvic vein embolisation for pelvic venous reflux. All patients had serum urea and electrolytes tested before procedure. Embolisation coils used were interlock embolisation coils (Boston Scientific, USA) as they can be repositioned after deployment and before release. We noted (1) complications during or post-procedure (2) successful abolition of pelvic venous reflux on transvaginal duplex scanning (3) number of veins (territories) treated and number of coils used. Results In 24 months, 121 patients underwent pelvic vein embolisation. Three males were excluded as transvaginal duplex scanning was impossible and six females excluded due to lack of complete data. None of these nine had any complications. Of 112 females analysed, mean age 45 years (24-71), 104 were for leg varices, 48 vulval varices and 20 for pelvic congestion syndrome (some had more than one indication). There were no deaths or serious complications to 30 days. Two procedures were abandoned, one completed subsequently and one was technically successful on review. One more had transient bradycardia and one had a coil removed by snare during the procedure. The mean number of venous territories treated was 2.9 and a mean of 3.3 coils was used per territory. Conclusion Pelvic vein embolisation under local anaesthetic is safe and technically effective in a remote out-patient facility outside of a hospital.

Aims To report on great saphenous vein diameter distribution of patients undergoing endovenous laser ablation for lower limb varicose veins and the ablation technique for large diameter veins. Methods We collected retrospective data of 1929 (943 left leg and 986 right leg) clinically incompetent great saphenous vein diameters treated with endovenous laser ablation over five years and six months. The technical success of procedure, complications and occlusion rate at short-term follow-up are reported. Upon compression, larger diameter veins may constrict asymmetrically rather than concentrically around the laser fibre (the 'smile sign'), requiring multiple passes of the laser into each dilated segment to achieve complete ablation. Results Of 1929 great saphenous veins, 334 (17.31%) had a diameter equal to or over 15 mm, which has been recommended as the upper limit for endovenous laser ablation by some clinicians. All were successfully treated and occluded upon short-term follow-up. Conclusion We suggest that incompetent great saphenous veins that need treatment can always be treated with endovenous laser ablation, and open surgery should never be recommended on vein diameter alone.

Background Pelvic venous reflux is often treated with pelvic vein embolisation; however, atypical pelvic venous anatomy may provide therapeutic challenges. Methods We retrospectively reviewed seven patient files and reported symptoms, diagnostic imaging, aberrant anatomy and means by which the interventional radiologist successfully completed the procedure. Any follow-up data were included if available. Results Four anatomical abnormalities were found: internal iliac veins draining into the contralateral common iliac vein, duplicated inferior vena cava, reverse-angle renal veins with atypical left ovarian vein drainage and direct drainage of the internal iliac vein to the inferior vena cava. All patients were successfully treated with pelvic vein embolisation. Conclusion Abnormal embryologic development may cause variable pelvic venous anatomy. Knowledge of this will enable interventional radiologists to successfully treat such patients.

Objectives To report on a male cohort with pelvic vein reflux and associated primary and recurrent lower limb varicose veins. Methods Full lower limb duplex ultrasonography revealed significant pelvic contribution in eight males presenting with bilateral lower limb varicose veins. Testicular and internal iliac veins were examined with either one or a combination of computed tomography, magnetic resonance venography, testicular, transabdominal or transrectal duplex ultrasonography. Subsequently, all patients received pelvic vein embolisation, prior to leg varicose vein treatment. Results Pelvic vein reflux was found in 23 of the 32 truncal pelvic veins and these were treated by pelvic vein embolisation. Four patients have since completed their leg varicose vein treatment and four are undergoing leg varicose vein treatments currently. Conclusion Pelvic vein reflux contributes towards lower limb venous insufficiency in some males with leg varicose veins. Despite the challenges, we suggest that pelvic vein reflux should probably be investigated and pelvic vein embolisation considered in such patients.

Background During sclerotherapy, it has been recommended to confirm intravenous placement of the needle by aspirating blood into the sclerosant syringe. This may inactivate some, or all of the sclerosant. Aims To quantify the volume of human blood needed to completely inactivate 1 ml of sodium tetradecyl sulphate, and comparing fresh blood and blood that has been stored in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tube. Methods A series of manual titrations were carried out following a procedure developed at STD Pharmaceutical Products Ltd (Hereford, UK) and listed in the British Pharmacopeia. Three percent of sodium tetradecyl sulphate stock solutions were made with increasing volumes of blood and titrated against benzethonium chloride to determine the active concentration (% w/v) of sodium tetradecyl sulphate remaining in the solution. Results A calculated approximation showed 0.3 ml of blood is required to fully inactivate 1 ml of 3% sodium tetradecyl sulphate when made into a foam. A comparison was made between the use of fresh blood and blood stored in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes. Blood stored in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes showed more inactivation of sodium tetradecyl sulphate, but this was not significant at the P ≤ 0.05 level. Conclusion The data from our study have shown that a minimum of 0.3 ml of fresh blood is required to inactivate 1 ml of 3% sodium tetradecyl sulphate as a foam and it is not significantly affected by storing blood in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tube. Our methodology suggests that during foam sclerotherapy treatment, blood should not be aspirated into the syringe to confirm position, and that ultrasound guidance is more appropriate for needle placement.

Background In previous in vitro and ex vivo studies, we have shown increased thermal spread can be achieved with radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy when using a low power and slower, discontinuous pullback. We aimed to determine the clinical success rate of radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy using this optimised protocol for the treatment of superficial venous reflux in truncal veins. Methods Sixty-three patients were treated with radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy using the optimised protocol and were followed up after one year (mean 16.3 months). Thirty-five patients returned for audit, giving a response rate of 56%. Duplex ultrasonography was employed to check for truncal reflux and compared to initial scans. Results In the 35 patients studied, there were 48 legs, with 64 truncal veins treated by radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (34 great saphenous, 15 small saphenous and 15 anterior accessory saphenous veins). One year post-treatment, complete closure of all previously refluxing truncal veins was demonstrated on ultrasound, giving a success rate of 100%. Conclusions Using a previously reported optimised, low power/slow pullback radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy protocol, we have shown it is possible to achieve a 100% ablation at one year. This compares favourably with results reported at one year post-procedure using the high power/fast pullback protocols that are currently recommended for this device.

Objectives: To analyse the biological effects of a 1920 nm endovenous laser (EVL) on extra-fascial great saphenous vein (GSV) in vitro ., Methods: A 10 cm length of a large tributary bypassing a hypoplastic segment of the GSV (sometimes called an "extra-fascial GSV") was obtained during routine varicose vein surgery. The length was treated in five sections with different LEEDs (0 (control), 20, 40, 60, and 80 J/cm) with a 1920 nm EVL at 4W power, in a novel in vitro treatment model. The biological effects were assessed by histological staining of the samples for haematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Martius Scarlet Blue (MSB), and by immunofluorescent detection of p-p53 and VCAM-1., Results: Histological analysis showed significant structural damage at LEEDs above 60 J/cm, especially in the intima and media, with the treatment at 80 J/cm causing perforation of the vein wall. In addition, there was a significant increase in p-p53 expression in treated tissue at 60 and 80 J/cm., Conclusions: Using this ex vivo model, the results indicate that in vitro treatment with a 1920 nm EVL, at or above an LEED of 60 J/cm and 4 W power, causes significant vein wall cell death reaching deep into the media by a combination of direct thermal damage and apoptosis. A wavelength of 1920 nm appears to be effective for the endovenous ablation of truncal veins.

Objectives: Endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) of varicose veins was introduced in the late 1990s with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the VNUS Closure device. The results of the original VNUS Closure device for the abolition of truncal venous reflux at 15 years are reported., Methods: A prospective audit of a group of patients treated with VNUS Closure 15 years previously was carried out, using clinical assessment and duplex ultrasound. A total of 189 patients were treated with VNUS Closure between March 1999 and December 2001 and were invited for clinical assessment (subjective and objective) and duplex ultrasonography (DUS) to assess treatment outcome and de novo disease progression. DUS outcome of the treated vein was graded: 1, complete success (complete atrophy); 2, partial success (> 1 patent section; none giving rise to recurrent varicose veins); 3, partial failure (≥ 1 patent sections giving rise to recurrent varicose veins); 4, complete failure., Results: Fifty-eight patients (91 legs, 101 truncal veins) returned for follow-up DUS, giving a 31.5% response rate (many patients had moved or had died in the 15 years). Two truncal veins had been excluded following treatment elsewhere presumably for partial or complete failure. At a mean of 15.4 years post-procedure, 51 (56%) reported no varicose veins, 58 (100%) that they were pleased that they had the procedure and 57 (98%) that they would recommend the procedure. DUS showed 88% of patients achieved success with no clinical recurrence in the originally treated veins. De novo reflux was identified in 47 of 91 legs (51.6%), showing disease progression in veins that were originally competent., Conclusions: RFA with VNUS Closure achieved excellent long-term technical success in treating venous reflux in truncal veins 15 years post-procedure, demonstrated by DUS. This bodes well for the increased use of EVTA in treating truncal vein reflux., (Copyright © 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To investigate the thermal spread achieved in porcine liver when using an optimised radiofrequency ablation protocol and correlate findings with the effects seen in ex vivo great saphenous vein (GSV), in order to justify clinical use with the new treatment protocol., Material and Methods: Porcine liver and GSV sections were treated with radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (RFiTT) using the following settings: 20 W at 1 s/cm (linear endovenous energy density; LEED 20 J/cm), 18 W at 1 s/cm (LEED 18 J/cm), 18 W at 3 s/cm (LEED 54 J/cm), 6 W interrupted pull-back 6 s stationary every 0.5 cm (LEED 72 J/cm). Thermal spread in the liver was measured via digital imaging. GSV sections were sent to an independent laboratory for histological analysis. Previous work suggests a thermal spread of >0.65 mm in liver correlates with transmural thermoablation of a GSV., Results: Parameters giving a LEED of 72 J/cm produced the best results, with a clear transmural effect in the GSV and maximal thermal spread of 1.65 mm, without excessive thermal damage or carbonisation in the ablation tract., Conclusions: Our porcine liver model correlated well with histological findings and was representative of the thermoablative effects observed in the GSV wall treated with RFiTT. Clinical investigations are now being carried out to investigate the efficacy of this protocol in the clinical setting.

Objectives The objective is to identify the factors that affect the optimal linear endovenous energy density (LEED) to ablate incompetent truncal veins. Methods We performed a literature review of clinical studies, which reported truncal vein ablation rates and LEED. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flow diagram documents the search strategy. We analysed 13 clinical papers which fulfilled the criteria to be able to compare results of great saphenous vein occlusion as defined by venous duplex ultrasound, with the LEED used in the treatment. Results Evidence suggests that the optimal LEED for endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein is >80 J/cm and <100 J/cm in terms of optimal closure rates with minimal side-effects and complications. Longer wavelengths targeting water might have a lower optimal LEED. A LEED <60 J/cm has reduced efficacy regardless of wavelength. The optimal LEED may vary with vein diameter and may be reduced by using specially shaped fibre tips. Laser delivery technique and type as well as the duration time of energy delivery appear to play a role in determining LEED. Conclusion The optimal LEED to ablate an incompetent great saphenous vein appears to be >80 J/cm and <95 J/cm based on current evidence for shorter wavelength lasers. There is evidence that longer wavelength lasers may be effective at LEEDs of <85 J/cm.