Search

Background: Large electricity-generating wind turbines emit both audible sound and inaudible infrasound at very low frequencies that are outside of the normal human range of hearing. Sufferers of wind turbine syndrome (WTS) have attributed their ill-health and particularly their sleep disturbance to the signature pattern of infrasound. Critics have argued that these symptoms are psychological in origin and are attributable to nocebo effects., Objectives: We aimed to test the effects of 72 h of infrasound (1.6-20 Hz at a sound level of ∼ 90 dB pk re 20 μ Pa , simulating a wind turbine infrasound signature) exposure on human physiology, particularly sleep., Methods: We conducted a randomized double-blind triple-arm crossover laboratory-based study of 72 h exposure with a > 10 -d washout conducted in a noise-insulated sleep laboratory in the style of a studio apartment. The exposures were infrasound ( ∼ 90   dB pk), sham infrasound (same speakers not generating infrasound), and traffic noise exposure [active control; at a sound pressure level of 40-50 dB LA eq,night and 70 dB LAF max transient maxima, night (2200 to 0700 hours)]. The following physiological and psychological measures and systems were tested for their sensitivity to infrasound: wake after sleep onset (WASO; primary outcome) and other measures of sleep physiology, wake electroencephalography, WTS symptoms, cardiovascular physiology, and neurobehavioral performance., Results: We randomized 37 noise-sensitive but otherwise healthy adults (18-72 years of age; 51% female) into the study before a COVID19-related public health order forced the study to close. WASO was not affected by infrasound compared with sham infrasound ( - 1.36 min; 95% CI: - 6.60 , 3.88, p = 0.60 ) but was worsened by the active control traffic exposure compared with sham by 6.07 min (95% CI: 0.75, 11.39, p = 0.02 ). Infrasound did not worsen any subjective or objective measures used., Discussion: Our findings did not support the idea that infrasound causes WTS. High level, but inaudible, infrasound did not appear to perturb any physiological or psychological measure tested in these study participants. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10757.

Studies of human populations have produced conflicting evidence on whether increased intake of dietary fat increases the risk of female reproductive system cancer. Some animal studies have indicated that the perinatal period of development is the sensitive time for this effect. Since type of fat has been linked to cancer risk, the question is raised as to whether the perinatal period is also sensitive to type of fat. To test this question, mice were exposed perinatally to either corn oil, fish oil, olive oil, or lard, and tumor frequencies were determined for female offspring at the end of their lifespan. No significant differences were found between the 4 groups with respect to reproductive system tumor frequency. Also, there were no significant differences with respect to the variables of lifespan or body weight. Thus, there was no indication that the perinatal period of development was sensitive to type of fat with respect to carcinogenic effects.