Search

Background: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) or TIA face an elevated cardiovascular risk, warranting intensive lipid-lowering therapy. Despite recommendations, adherence to guidelines is suboptimal, leading to frequent undertreatment. This study aims to evaluate the statin use after IS and TIA., Methods: LIPYDS is a multicenter, observational, retrospective study including ≥ 18-year-old patients discharged after IS/TIA from 19 Italian centers in 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine (1) the association between statin prescription (Any-statin versus No-statin), type (High-Intensity-statin versus Other-statin [Moderate/Low-Intensity]) with stroke etiology (TOAST), (2) clinical variables independently associated with statin prescription in the entire cohort and within TOAST categories., Results: We included 3,740 patients (median age 75 [IQR 64-82]; median LDL-C 104 [IQR 79-131]). At discharge, 1,971 (52.7%) received a High-intensity-statin, 800 (21.4%) Other-statin, 969 (25.9%) No-statin therapy. Among patients not on statin therapy before the event (N = 2686 [71.8%]), 50.1% initiated High-intensity-statin (78.2% of those with Large-Artery-Atherosclerosis, 60.8% Small-Vessel-Disease, 34.7% Cardioembolic, 47.4% Undetermined etiology); in 33% the decision to abstain from initiating statin therapy persisted. Large-Artery-Atherosclerosis showed the strongest association with Any-statin (aOR 3.07 [95%CI 2.39-3.95], p < 0.001) and High-intensity-statin (aOR 4.51 [95%CI 3.39-6.00], p < 0.001), while Cardioembolic stroke showed an inverse association (respectively, aOR 0.36 [95%CI 0.31-0.43], p < 0.001 and aOR 0.52 [95%CI 0.44-0.62], p < 0.001). Stepwise regression highlighted LDL-C and previous statin therapy as consistent predictors of statin at discharge. Older patients and women were less likely to be on a high-intensity formulation., Conclusion: Statins, especially at high-intensity, are under-prescribed after IS and TIA, with older patients, women and those with non-atherosclerotic strokes being the most affected., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: Andrea Zini received funding for speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CSL Behring, Angels Initiative, Alexion-AstraZeneca, for scientific advisory board from Alexion-AstraZeneca and Bayer. Manuel Cappellari received consultancy or advisory board fees or speaker’s honoraria from Pfizer/Bristol-Meyer-Squibb, and Daiichi-Sankyo. All other co-authors have no relevant competing interests related to this study. Ethical statement: This study was approved by the local Ethical Committee (Comitato Etico Milano Area 3, n. 290-20042022)., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Aims: Ischemic strokes in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) despite optimal adherence pose a therapeutic challenge. We assessed the utility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in identifying potential competing cardiac causes for stroke that occurred despite adequate OAT., Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke between January 2022 and June 2023 who were on OAT for an established long-term indication. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, along with assessment of OAT adherence, were conducted. Demographic data, OAT details, and stroke characteristics were analysed to determine the influence of TEE findings on therapeutic decisions., Results: We included 26 patients. TEE identified potential cardiac competing stroke mechanisms in 88% of cases, with valvular thrombi and left atrial or appendage thrombus being predominant. Infective endocarditis, often asymptomatic, was unexpectedly prevalent. TEE significantly influenced therapeutic decisions, especially in cases where transthoracic echocardiography was inconclusive., Conclusions: TEE may be crucial for unravelling the mechanisms of ischemic stroke in patients on adequate OAT, guiding precise therapeutic strategies and potentially reducing the risk of recurrent embolic events. Our findings underscore the limitations of standard echocardiography in detecting cardiac embolic sources and emphasize the importance of tailored decision-making in secondary stroke prevention., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute intracranial occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) can be distinguished into (a) occlusion of the terminal ICA, involving the proximal segments of the middle or anterior cerebral artery (ICA-L/-T) and (b) non-terminal intracranial occlusions of the ICA with patent circle of Willis (ICA-I). While patients with ICA-L/-T occlusion were included in all randomized controlled trials on endovascular therapy (EVT) in anterior large vessel occlusion, data on EVT in ICA-I occlusion is scarce. We thus aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of EVT in ICA-I occlusions in comparison to ICA-L/-T occlusions., Methods: A large international multicentre cohort was searched for patients with intracranial ICA occlusion treated with EVT between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified by ICA occlusion pattern, differentiating ICA-I and ICA-L/-T occlusions. Baseline factors, technical (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) scale) and functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] at 3 months) as well as rates of (symptomatic) intracranial hemorrhage ([s]ICH) were analyzed., Results: Of 13,453 patients, 1825 (13.6%) had isolated ICA occlusion. ICA-occlusion pattern was ICA-I in 559 (4.2%) and ICA-L/-T in 1266 (9.4%) patients. Age (years: 74 vs 73), sex (female: 45.8% vs 49.0%) and pre-stroke functional independency (pre-mRS ⩽ 2: 89.9% vs 92.2%) did not differ between the groups. Stroke severity was lower in ICA-I patients (NIHSS at admission: 14 [7-19] vs 17 [13-21] points). EVT was similarly successful with respect to technical (mTICI2b/3: 76.1% (ICA-I) vs 76.6% (ICA-L/-T); aOR 1.01 [0.76-1.35]) and functional outcome (mRS ordinal shift cOR 1.01 [0.83-1.23] in adjusted analyses. Rates of ICH (18.9% vs 34.5%; aOR 0.47 [0.36-0.62] and sICH (4.7% vs 7.3%; aOR 0.58 [0.35-0.97] were lower in ICA-I patients., Conclusion: EVT might be performed safely and similarly successful in patients with ICA-I occlusions as in patients with ICA-L/-T occlusions., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: RRL received speaker honoraria from IscemaView, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Jansen, Biogen, Medtronic and Abott and advisory board honoraria from Jansen and Bayer.STE has received funding for travel or speaker honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi-Sankyo. He has served on scientific advisory boards for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, and MindMaze and on the editorial board of Stroke. His institutions have received an educational grant from Pfizer, compensation from Stago for educational efforts and research support from Daiichi-Sankyo, the Science Funds [Wissenschaftsfonds] of the University Hospital Basel, the University Basel, from the “Wissenschaftsfonds Rehabilitation” of the University Hospital for Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, the “Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel,” the Swiss Heart Foundation, and the Swiss National Science Foundation.HG has received research support from the Swiss National Science Foundation, advisory board honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo and funding for travel from BMS/Pfizer.AZ received speaker honoraria from CSL Behring, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Alexion-Astra Zeneca and Daiichi Sankyo and advisory board honoraria from Bayer, Astra Zeneca and Daiichi Sankyo.DRJ received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Boehringer Ingelheim.VP received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Boehringer Ingelheim.H.J.A. reports receiving personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, and Roche that all produce products for hyperacute stroke care.MRH reports grants from SITEM Research Support Funds and Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, not directly related to this manuscript.AS received travel grants from NovoNordiskPM received grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, and Faculty of Biology and Medicine of the Lausanne UniversityCHN reports receiving speaker honoraria from Abbot, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda, all outside the submitted work.All further authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the presented study.

Introduction: Most intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) trials assessed outcome at 3 months but the recovery trajectory of ICH survivors may continue up to 1 year after the index event. We aimed to describe the predictors of functional outcome improvement from 3 to 12 months after ICH., Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to six European Stroke Centers for supratentorial ICH. Functional outcome was measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 and 12 months. Predictors of functional outcome improvement were explored with binary logistic regression., Results: We included 703 patients, of whom 245 (34.9%) died within 3 months. Among survivors, 131 (28.6%) had an mRS improvement, 78 (17.0%) had a worse mRS and 249 (54.4%) had a stable functional status at 12 months. Older age and the presence of baseline disability (defined as pre-stroke mRS > 1), were associated with lower odds of functional outcome improvement (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.98 per year increase, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.96-1.00, p  = 0.017 and OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81, p  = 0.008 respectively). Conversely, deep ICH location increased the probability of long term mRS improvement (OR 1.67, 95% CI, 1.07-2.61, p  = 0.023). Patients with mild-moderate disability at 3 months (mRS 2-3) had the highest odds of improvement at 12 months (OR 8.76, 95% CI 3.68-20.86, p  < 0.001)., Discussion and Conclusion: Long term recovery is common after ICH and associated with age, baseline functional status, mRS at 3 months and hematoma location. Our findings might inform future trials and improve long-term prognostication in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. Morotti declared consulting and expert meeting honoraria for EMG-REG International and AstraZeneca. Jawed Nawabi is supported by the BIH Charité – Digital Clinician Scientist Program funded by Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, the Berlin Institute of Health and the German Research Foundation (DFG,Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). Dr. Paciaroni received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of Sanofi-Aventis, iRhythm, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Daiiki Sankyo and Pfizer. Dr. Zini declared consulting and speaker fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Alexion-AstraZeneca and CSL Behring, Bayer, Angels Iniziative, Daiichi-Sankio.All the other Authors report no disclosures.

Background: Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a time-dependent neurological disorder often misdiagnosed in the emergency setting. Electroencephalography (EEG) is often not available on a 24/7 basis, and Salzburg criteria may at times miss the diagnosis. Here, we tested the accuracy of hyperperfusion on CT perfusion imaging (CTP) in the identification of NCSE against Salzburg criteria, to define its potential role in a pragmatic diagnostic workflow., Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with suspected acute seizure or seizure disorder undergoing brain imaging with CTP and EEG from January 2021 to March 2023. EEG recordings, Salzburg criteria and CTP hyperperfusion were rated and adjudicated by two independent experts blinded to patient status. A reference standard including all clinical, lab, imaging, EEG and therapeutic data was used to adjudicate NCSE diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for CTP hyperperfusion and Salzburg criteria versus NCSE adjudicated according to reference standard., Results: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled. Among 21 NCSE cases, 17 were adjudicated according to Salzburg criteria (81%) and 4 received NCSE diagnosis according to reference standard. Agreement between EEG and CTP emerged in 16/21 NCSE cases, reaching sublobar level in 37.5% of cases. Receiver operator curve analysis suggested good accuracy for CTP hyperperfusion for the diagnosis of NCSE (AUROC 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.89). CTP hyperperfusion had a high NPV for NCSE (NPV 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1)., Conclusion: CTP hyperperfusion may be implemented in the emergency fast-track to rule out NCSE, given very high NPV. Further validation studies are needed to evaluate CTP application in real-world setting for NCSE codes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Although different studies have investigated career choices as cognitive acts of decision-making, non-cognitive components also play an important role. The study tries to develop an empirically based model of career decision-making process linking cognitive (search for work self-efficacy - SWSE) and non-cognitive (psychological well-being - PWB) components. In particular, the study investigates, among 148 never-employed Italian young adults, to what extent the relationship between SWSE and career indecision in terms of lack of readiness (LoR) can be explained by their common relationship with PWB. Results highlighted that SWSE is negatively associated with LoR when considered in absence of PWB. However, when PWB was included in one comprehensive model, it was positively associated with SWSE and negatively related to LoR. Moreover, the presence of PWB nullified the negative association between SWSE and LoR, meaning that PWB shares a large extent of variance with these variables. Implications are discussed in the light of theoretical expectations and limitations., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.