1. Midterm outcomes of the modified Lapidus arthrodesis using the Phantom® Intramedullary Nail System for the treatment of hallux valgus.
- Author
-
Benavente Valdivia JC and Reategui Villegas D
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Male, Female, Aged, Adult, Treatment Outcome, Hallux Valgus surgery, Hallux Valgus diagnostic imaging, Arthrodesis instrumentation, Arthrodesis methods, Bone Nails
- Abstract
Background: Lapidus arthrodesis is one of the most commonly used techniques in the correction of moderate and severe hallux valgus. We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes after using the Phantom® Lapidus intramedullary nail to find an effective technique with low complications., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 52 patients who underwent a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail at our center from November 2019 to September 2022. The mean follow-up period was 27 (range, 18-34) months. Clinical results were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the European Foot and Ankle Society score (EFAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS); three different radiological measures were analyzed., Results: The mean AOFAS score increased from 44.8 to 82 points. The mean EFAS score increased from 11.2 to 20.1 points. The mean VAS score decreased by 4.7 points. The mean EFAS Sport score was increased from 9.2 (SD 4.6) to 12.6 (SD 5.4) points. The intermetatarsal angle decreased from 15° to 6.9° and the hallux valgus angle by a mean of 17.9°. The forefoot width reduced from 93.6 to 84.7 mm. All results were statistically significant (p < .001). One case of nonunion was recorded. No implant-related complications were observed., Conclusions: This device was effective in correcting moderate to severe hallux valgus, with significant patient satisfaction. Its complication rate was not higher than that of other fixation devices. Correct compression of the arthrodesis, absence of extraosseous material, and multidirectional stability are important qualities of this implant for the correct treatment of this pathology., Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF