Search

Objectives: To investigate the agreement between continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement with the ClearSight system (cNIBP-CS) and standard intermittent noninvasive blood pressure measurement (iNIBP) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Additionally, the influence of vasoactive medication on potential measurement differences was assessed., Design: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial., Setting: At a university hospital., Participants: Thirty-four patients with PAD undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the lower limbs., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Continuous noninvasive blood pressures were measured with the "ClearSight" system and compared to standard iNIBPs. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of 13 mmHg (±15) between cNIBP-CS and iNIBP, with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) ranging from -17 to 42 mmHg. When comparing both medication groups, a similar mean bias was found for phenylephrine and dobutamine (12 mmHg [±13] and 13 mmHg [±13], respectively)., Conclusion: In this study, in patients with PAD, cNIBP-CS showed an underestimation of blood pressure compared to iNIBP in phenylephrine- and dobutamine-treated patients. Compared to previous studies, a larger bias and wider 95% LOA were found., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) leads to thoracic complications requiring surgery. This is challenging, particularly in patients supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) due to the need for continuous therapeutic anticoagulation. We aim to share our experience regarding the safety and perioperative management of video-assisted thoracic surgery for this specific population., Methods: Retrospective, single-center study between November 2020 and January 2022 at the ICU department of a 1.061-bed tertiary care and VV-ECMO referral center during the COVID-19 pandemic., Results: 48 COVID-19 patients were supported with VV-ECMO. A total of 14 video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedures were performed in seven patients. Indications were mostly hemothorax (85.7%). In eight procedures heparin was stopped at least 1 h before incision. A total of 10 circuit changes due to clot formation or oxygen transfer failure were required in six patients (85.7%). One circuit replacement seemed related to the preceding VATS procedure, although polytransfusion might be a contributing factor. None of the mechanical complications was fatal. Four VATS-patients (57.1%) died, of which two (50%) immediately perioperatively due to uncontrollable bleeding. All three survivors were treated with additional transarterial embolization., Conclusion: (1) Thoracic complications in COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO are common. (2) Indication for VATS is mostly hemothorax (3) Perioperative mortality is high, mostly due to uncontrollable bleeding. (4) Preoperative withdrawal of anticoagulation is not directly related to a higher rate of ECMO circuit-related complications, but a prolonged duration of VV-ECMO support and polytransfusion might be. (5) Additional transarterial embolization to control postoperative bleeding may further improve outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Preserving haemodynamics is expected to positively affect tissue oxygen saturation. We hypothesized that maintaining mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (using phenylephrine (PE) or dobutamine (Dobu)) would equally affect regional cerebral and paravertebral tissue saturation (rS c O 2 and rS pv O 2 , respectively). Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive either PE or Dobu, in order to keep MAP within 20% of the preoperative value. Their effect on haemodynamics, rS c O 2 and rS pv O 2 at thoracic level T 3 -T 4 , T 9 -T 10 and lumbar level L 1 -L 2 was calculated at different doses. Drug-induced haemodynamic effects differed between groups (∆MAP: -2%±21 and - 19%±17, ∆CI: -14.6%±14.6 and 24.1%±49.9, ∆HR: -21%±21 and 0%±16 for PE and Dobu, respectively). Both groups exhibited a significant decrease in rS c O 2 , with a more pronounced decline in the PE group (-14.1%±16.1) compared to the Dobu group (-5.9%±10.6). There were no significant changes at the paravertebral level in either group, but a slight but statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups at T 3 -T 4 and L 1 -L 2 . Current guidelines advocate maintaining adequate systemic blood pressures to prevent spinal cord ischaemia in specific procedures. However, it is still unknown which circulatory supportive drug is more beneficial for maintaining spinal cord perfusion. Our data indicates that, when used for maintenance of blood pressure within a 20% range of preoperative values, neither phenylephrine nor dobutamine affect paravertebral tissue saturation., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

In recent years, there has been an increasing scientific interest in the interaction between anaesthesia and cancer development. Retrospective studies show that the choice of anaesthetics may influence cancer outcome and cancer recurrence; however, these studies show contradictory results. Recently, some large randomized clinical trials have been completed, yet they show no significant effect of anaesthetics on cancer outcomes. In this scoping review, we compiled a body of in vivo and in vitro studies with the goal of evaluating the biological effects of anaesthetics on cancer cells in comparison to clinical effects as described in recent studies. It was found that sevoflurane, propofol, opioids and lidocaine are likely to display direct biological effects on cancer cells; however, significant effects are only found in studies with exposure to high concentrations of anaesthetics and/or during longer exposure times. When compared to clinical data, these differences in exposure and dose-effect relation, as well as tissue selectivity, population selection and unclear anaesthetic dosing protocols might explain the lack of outcome.

The novel coronavirus pandemic has radically changed the landscape of normal surgical practice. Lifesaving cancer surgery, however, remains a clinical priority, and there is an increasing need to fully define the optimal oncologic management of patients with varying stages of lung cancer, allowing prioritization of which thoracic procedures should be performed in the current era. Healthcare providers and managers should not ignore the risk of a bimodal peak of mortality in patients with lung cancer; an imminent spike due to mortality from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and a secondary peak reflecting an excess of cancer-related mortality among patients whose treatments were deemed less urgent, delayed, or cancelled. The European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Thoracic Anesthesia Subspecialty group has considered these challenges and developed an updated set of expert recommendations concerning the infectious period, timing of surgery, vaccination, preoperative screening and evaluation, airway management, and ventilation of thoracic surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Kidney transplantation is universally recognized as the gold standard treatment in patients with End-stage Kidney Disease (ESKD, or according to the latest nomenclature, CKD stage 5). Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) is gradually becoming preferred technique in adults, even if applied in very few centra, with potentially improved clinical outcomes compared with open kidney transplantation. To date, only very few RAKT procedures in children have been described. Kidney transplant recipient patients, being immunocompromised, might be at increased risk for perioperative surgical complications, which creates additional challenges in management. Applying techniques of minimally invasive surgery may contribute to the improvement of clinical outcomes for the pediatric transplant patients population and help mitigate the morbidity of KT. However, many challenges remain ahead. Minimally invasive surgery has been consistently shown to produce improved clinical outcomes as compared to open surgery equivalents. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has been able to overcome many restrictions of classical laparoscopy, particularly in complex and demanding surgical procedures. Despite the presence of these improvements, many challenges lie ahead in the surgical and technical-material realms, in addition to anesthetic and economic considerations. RALS in children poses additional challenges to both the surgical and anesthesiology team, due to specific characteristics such as a small abdominal cavity and a reduced circulating blood volume. Cost-effectiveness, esthetic and functional wound outcomes, minimal age and weight to undergo RALS and effect of RAKT on graft function are discussed. Although data on RAKT in children is scarce, it is a safe and feasible procedure and results in excellent graft function. It should only be performed by a RAKT team experienced in both RALS and transplantation surgery, fully supported by a pediatric nephrology and anesthesiology team. Further research is necessary to better determine the value of the robotic approach as compared to the laparoscopic and open approach. Cost-effectiveness will remain an important subject of debate and is in need of further evaluation as well., Competing Interests: KD is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, United States of America. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Grammens, Schechter, Desender, Claeys, Sinatti, VandeWalle, Vermassen, Raes, Vanpeteghem, Prytula, Silay, Breda, Decaestecker and Spinoit.)

The novel coronavirus has caused a pandemic around the world. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus infection who have to undergo thoracic surgery will be a challenge for the anesthesiologists. The thoracic subspecialty committee of European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) has conducted a survey of opinion in order to create recommendations for the anesthetic approach to these challenging patients. It should be emphasized that both the management of the infected patient with COVID-19 and the self-protection of the anesthesia team constitute a complicated challenge. The text focuses therefore on both important topics., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

While the effects of phenylephrine (PE) and ephedrine (E) on cerebral oxygen saturation (rS c O 2 ) already has been studied, the effect on paraspinal oxygen saturation (rS ps O 2 ) is still unexplored. This study aims to assess the effect of PE and E on rS c O 2 and rS ps O 2 , measured with near-infrared spectroscopy. A randomized 4-treatment cross-over trial was designed in 28 patients under BIS-titrated anaesthesia with sevoflurane. If MAP decreased more than 20% from baseline, incremental doses of PE and/or E were given according to the randomization (group I: E-PE-E, group II: PE-E-PE, group III: E-E-E, group IV: PE-PE-PE). rS c O 2 and rS ps O 2 on T 3 -T 4 , T 9 -T 10 and L 1 -L 2 were recorded. Differences in rSO 2 (post-pretreatment) within each group were analyzed with paired Student's t test. Differences in effects of PE and E on rS c O 2 and rS ps O 2 were analyzed with linear mixed-modelling. Following PE administration, rS c O 2 decreased significantly (- 2.7% ± 3.5), while it remained stable following E (- 0.6% ± 3.6). Contrastingly, rS ps O 2 at T 3 -T 4 , T 9 -T 10 and L 1 -L 2 slightly increased following PE (0.4% ± 2.5, 0.7% ± 2.0 and - 0.1% ± 1.4, respectively), while it decreased after E administration (- 1.3% ± 3.4%, - 0.7% ± 2.6% and - 1.3% ± 2.7%, respectively). Compared to E, PE administration was associated with a significant decrease in rS c O 2 (- 2.1%, 95% CI [- 3.1%, - 1.2%], p < 0.001). In contrast, compared to PE, E was associated with a significant decrease in rS ps O 2 at T 3 -T 4 , T 9 -T 10 and L 1 -L 2 (- 2.0%, 95% CI [- 2.8, - 1.1], p < 0.001; - 1.4%, 95% CI [- 2.4%, - 0.4%], p = 0.006; and - 1.5%, 95% CI [- 2.3%, - 0.8%], p < 0.001, respectively). An opposite effect on rS c O 2 and rS ps O 2 was observed after bolus administration of PE and E.

Introduction: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children. Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) in adults is becoming increasingly common with potentially improved morbidity compared with open KT. The study objective was to evaluate feasibility and outcomes of RAKT in children., Patients & Methods: An 8-years-old boy with ESRD received a kidney transplant from his mother. Simultaneously in two operation theatres, the boy underwent single-port (GelPOINT®) right laparoscopic nephro-ureterectomy (LNU), and his mother underwent robot-assisted left donor nephrectomy (RADN).Two full surgical teams were operating at the same time. Subsequently, the boy underwent RAKT, introducing the graft through the GelPOINT®., Results: Total operative time for LNU, RADN, and RAKT was 180, 140, and 195 min, respectively, with warm, cold, and rewarming ischemia times 1.5, 200, and 47 min, respectively. Blood loss was 300, 20, and 50 cc, respectively. No intraoperative complications were noted. Convalescence of both donor and recipient was uneventful, with good kidney function at 1-year follow-up., Conclusion: RAKT in children is technically feasible and safe, resulting in excellent graft function. Concomitant nephrectomy can be done laparoscopically through the single-site GelPOINT®. An experienced RAKT team with the full support of pediatric nephrologists is mandatory., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe a simple, noninvasive technique to detect changes in oxygen saturation at the level of the spinal cord and to suggest its suitability for individualized blood pressure management during and after thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair., Case Report: A 53-year-old man with a history of multiple arch and thoracic aortic procedures underwent staged hybrid treatment of a large TAAA due to chronic dissection from the distal aortic arch into the iliac arteries. During the procedures, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) sensors were applied over the 10th thoracic vertebra for continuous monitoring of tissue oxygen saturation (S(s)O(2)) during endovascular repair. After stent-graft deployment, mean S(s)O(2) decreased significantly. Moreover, the relationship between S(s)O(2) and arterial blood pressure became linear, reflecting pressure dependency of spinal cord perfusion after stent deployment., Conclusion: These data show that NIRS monitors post-endograft changes in S(s)O(2) that were strongly related to arterial blood pressure. Regional NIRS monitoring at the vertebral level may function as a valuable noninvasive guide to the management of blood pressure during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, both intra- and postoperatively.