Search

Air pollution is a major concern of the new civilized world due to its adverse impact on human health and environment. As typical air pollutants, nitrogen oxide (NO X ) and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) not only pollute the atmosphere by forming acid rain and particulate matter, but are also harmful to the human respiratory system. Significant emissions of NO X and SO 2 in the production phases make the textile industry under enormous environmental pressure. Chemical footprint (ChF) is an effective method for transforming the potential environmental risks of pollutant emissions into an intuitive form of toxicity. In this study, we present a ChF assessment method for NO X and SO 2 emissions from textiles production. For this purpose, we adopt the USEtox model and calculate the relevant characterization factors (CFs) by considering the physicochemical properties and toxicity of NO X and SO 2 . The textile industry in Zhejiang Province, China, is chosen as a case study to demonstrate the feasibility of this proposed ChF assessment methodology. Results indicate that ChF caused by NO X emission in Zhejiang's textile industry is approximately eight times larger than that caused by SO 2 emission. The four sub-sectors of Zhejiang's textile industry (textile manufacturing sector; textile wearing apparel, footware, and caps manufacturing sector; leather, fur, feather and related products manufacturing sector; chemical fibers manufacturing sector) also have similar proportional distributions of ChFs. Besides, the textile manufacturing sector has the largest ChF, accounting for 73% of the total ChF caused by NO X and SO 2 emissions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pesticides are widely used in food production, yet the potential harm associated with their emission into the environment is rarely considered in the context of sustainable diets. In this study, a life cycle assessment was used to quantify the freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity carcinogenic effects, and human toxicity noncarcinogenic effects associated with pesticide use in relation to 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. The three environmental indicators were also combined into a pesticide toxicity footprint, and a diet quality score was applied to each diet. Energy-dense and nutrient-poor discretionary foods, fruits, and protein-rich foods were the sources of most of the dietary pesticide impacts. Problematically, a dietary shift toward recommended diets was found to increase the pesticide toxicity footprint compared to the current average diet. Using a quadrant analysis, a recommended diet was identified with a 38% lower pesticide toxicity footprint. This was achieved mainly through a reduction in the discretionary food intake and by limiting the choice of fresh fruits. As the latter contradicts dietary recommendations to eat a variety of fruits of different types and colors, we concluded that dietary change may not be the best approach to lowering the environmental impacts of pesticides in the food system. Instead, targeted action in the horticultural industry may be more effective. Consumers might encourage this transition by supporting growers that reduce pesticide use and apply less environmentally harmful active ingredients.