Search

Introduction: We evaluated the UroVysion (Abbott Molecular, IL, USA) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for the diagnosis of urothelial cancer in patients diagnosed with or suspected to have bladder, upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and combined upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma (BC)., Materials and Methods: A single institution retrospective analysis comparing sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for FISH and urinary cytology. FISH within 6 months of endoscopic evaluation were obtained from outpatient voided urine samples. Our institutional pathology department confirmed pathologic disease from specimens obtained during endoscopic evaluations for lower tract disease. For upper tract disease, disease was confirmed by retrograde ureteroscopy, biopsies of visual lesions, and site-specific upper tract cytology., Results: A total of 415 patients submitted FISH specimens. Overall, FISH was more sensitive than cytology 54.9% in comparison with cytology 42.2% (p = 0.01), specificity favored cytology 92.9% compared to 73.5% with FISH (p < 0.01). For BC only patients, the same significant finding of increased sensitivity and decreased specificity was identified, but for UTUC alone and combined UTUC and BC, there was no significant difference. Cytology had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over FISH, 76.9% in comparison to 64.6% (p = 0.02). Negative predictive value (NPV) also favored cytology 74.2% versus 64.9% (p = 0.02). When analyzing individual cohorts, cytology had improved PPV for BC alone patients. UTUC showed no difference for PPV and NPV. For both UTUC and BC, NPV was slightly favored for FISH over cytology 93.2% versus 91.2% (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Voided urine FISH testing does offer a higher detection of urothelial carcinoma for BC compared to voided cytology; however, specificity was worse. FISH does not appear to improve detection of urothelial carcinoma in patients with either UTUC only or both BC and UTUC.

Objective: • To investigate both the feasibility and the adequacy of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) by comparing lymph node yields obtained during RALP with those obtained during traditional open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP)., Patients and Methods: • We retrospectively reviewed 1047 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2001 and 2009. • In all, 626 patients underwent RALP while 421 patients had traditional open RRP. All patients undergoing bilateral PLND were included in our analysis. • Lymph node yields and lymph node involvement for each surgical approach were calculated and examined. • PLND-related complications were analysed., Results: • Of the 1047 patients, 816 patients underwent bilateral PLND of whom 473 underwent RALP, while 343 underwent RRP. The mean lymph node yields for the RALP cohort (7.1, interquartile range 4-10) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than for the RRP cohort (6.0, interquartile range 3-8). • The percentage of patients with nodal involvement was 1.1 for RALP and 2.3 for RRP (P= 0.167). • Mean age, preoperative PSA values, and pre- and postoperative Gleason scores were similar between the two cohorts. • PLND-related complications were similar between both cohorts., Conclusions: • In patients undergoing RALP, PLND is feasible and provides lymph node yields comparable with those of the standard open approach. • PLND should be strongly considered in all radical prostatectomy patients when clinically indicated, regardless of surgical technique., (© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.)

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing. With the increasing emphasis on minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery, thermal ablation is playing a larger role in the management of patients with this disease. This review outlines imaging management, intraoperative and percutaneous ablation, and postprocedural follow-up of RCC., (Copyright (c) 2010 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)