Sousa Da Silva RX, Breuer E, Shankar S, Kawakatsu S, Hołówko W, Santos Coelho J, Jeddou H, Sugiura T, Ghallab M, Da Silva D, Watanabe G, Botea F, Sakai N, Addeo P, Tzedakis S, Bartsch F, Balcer K, Lim C, Werey F, Lopez-Lopez V, Peralta Montero L, Sanchez Claria R, Leiting J, Vachharajani N, Hopping E, Torres OJM, Hirano S, Andel D, Hagendoorn J, Psica A, Ravaioli M, Ahn KS, Reese T, Montes LA, Gunasekaran G, Alcázar C, Lim JH, Haroon M, Lu Q, Castaldi A, Orimo T, Moeckli B, Abadía T, Ruffolo L, Dib Hasan J, Ratti F, Kauffmann EF, de Wilde RF, Polak WG, Boggi U, Aldrighetti L, McCormack L, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Serrablo A, Toso C, Taketomi A, Gugenheim J, Dong J, Hanif F, Park JS, Ramia JM, Schwartz M, Ramisch D, De Oliveira ML, Oldhafer KJ, Kang KJ, Cescon M, Lodge P, Rinkes IHMB, Noji T, Thomson JE, Goh SK, Chapman WC, Cleary SP, Pekolj J, Regimbeau JM, Scatton O, Truant S, Lang H, Fuks D, Bachellier P, Ohtsuka M, Popescu I, Hasegawa K, Lesurtel M, Adam R, Cherqui D, Uesaka K, Boudjema K, Pinto-Marques H, Grąt M, Petrowsky H, Ebata T, Prachalias A, Robles-Campos R, and Clavien PA
Objective: This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities., Background: Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures., Methods: A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient., Results: Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months., Conclusion: These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)