1. Comparative study of pathogen detection methods for central nervous system infections: laboratory testing of tuberculous meningitis.
- Author
-
Liu Z, Zhu X, Zhang S, Li D, Wang D, Wang Y, Tang Y, Tong F, Xu W, Li G, Wei L, and Chu M
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Central Nervous System Infections diagnosis, Central Nervous System Infections cerebrospinal fluid, Central Nervous System Infections microbiology, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Young Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Tuberculosis, Meningeal diagnosis, Tuberculosis, Meningeal microbiology, Tuberculosis, Meningeal cerebrospinal fluid, Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetics, Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolation & purification, Sensitivity and Specificity
- Abstract
Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a severe central nervous system (CNS) infection with a challenging diagnosis due to inadequate detection methods. This study evaluated current clinical detection methods and their applicability., Methods: A cohort of 514 CNS infection patients from 2018 to 2020 was studied. Data on general demographics, Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) analysis, epidemiology, and clinical outcomes were collected. TBM patients were identified, and the sensitivities of mmetagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS), GeneXpert, and microbial culture were compared. Kappa statistic assessed the consistency between methods., Results: Among the patients involved, TBM (29%) and neurosyphilis (25%) were the two most prevalent CNS infections. CSF analysis indicated that 76% of patients had leukocytosis, suggesting a potential CNS inflammation. In TBM cases, 92.5% had elevated CSF protein and leukocyte counts. Moreover, the percentage of positive mNGS results was 55.6%. GeneXpert and MTB cultures alone had lower sensitivity, but combined use resulted in a 53.4% positive rate., Conclusions: This study highlights the high sensitivity of mNGS, comparable to GeneXpert and MTB culture. The combined methods are cost-effective and straightforward, and can partially substitute for mNGS, offering valuable alternatives for TBM diagnosis and providing insights into multiple diagnostic strategies in clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF