Search

Background: There is increasing concern regarding the lack of physicians and underresourcing of the medical system in Canada. The training of orthopedic surgeons has emerged as an area of particular concern. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the outcomes of graduates of orthopedic surgery residency programs in Ontario in the last 30 years., Methods: We invited graduates of orthopedic surgery residency programs in Ontario from 1992 to 2020 to participate in our survey regarding their practice patterns and career choices. Participants were asked whether they believed their residency had prepared them for independent practice and were asked about their practice patterns after graduation, including whether they completed fellowships., Results: A total of 618 graduates met the inclusion criteria. We had a response rate of 40.9% ( n = 253). A total of 62.8% of participants reported feeling ready to enter independent practice, which was less than the 80% expected threshold. This proportion varied by program and, overall, those who had graduated more recently reported feeling less ready. Nearly all participants had completed at least 1 fellowship, with most trainees having completed 2 fellowships. Earlier graduates were less likely to complete 2 or more fellowships. Completing a fellowship did not help with comfort in practice nor with earlier employment. Most respondents reported that their current surgical skills were primarily influenced by fellowship training, regardless of comfort level in entering practice directly out of residency., Conclusion: A substantial proportion of orthopedic graduates reported not feeling comfortable entering practice directly out of residency, with only 62.8% of participants reporting feeling ready for independent practice after graduation. Furtermore, graduates are incurring a significant opportunity cost completing 1 or often 2 fellowships. These findings necessitate an appraisal of our goals in residency education., Competing Interests: Competing interests:: Brent Lanting reports payments to his institution from Smith & Nephew, DePuy, Stryker, and Zimmer. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Aims: We aimed to compare reoperations following distal radial fractures (DRFs) managed with early fixation versus delayed fixation following initial closed reduction (CR)., Methods: We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to identify DRF patients aged 18 years or older from 2003 to 2016. We used procedural and fee codes within 30 days to determine which patients underwent early fixation (≤ seven days) or delayed fixation following CR. We grouped patients in the delayed group by their time to definitive fixation (eight to 14 days, 15 to 21 days, and 22 to 30 days). We used intervention and diagnostic codes to identify reoperations within two years. We used multivariable regression to compare the association between early versus delayed fixation and reoperation for all patients and stratified by age (18 to 60 years and > 60 years)., Results: We identified 14,960 DRF patients, 8,339 (55.7%) of whom underwent early surgical fixation (mean 2.9 days (SD 1.8)). In contrast, 4,042 patients (27.0%) underwent delayed fixation between eight and 14 days (mean 10.2 days (SD 2.2)), 1,892 (12.7%) between 14 and 21 days (mean 17.5 days (SD 1.9)) and 687 (4.6%) > 21 days (mean 24.8 days (SD 2.4)) post-fracture. Patients who underwent delayed fixation > 21 days post-fracture had a higher odds of reoperation (odds ratio (OR) 1.33 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.79) vs early fixation). This worsened for patients aged > 60 years (OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.79)). We found no difference in the odds of reoperation for patients who underwent delayed fixation within eight to 14 or 15 to 21 days post-fracture (vs early fixation)., Conclusion: These data suggest that DRF patients with fractures with unacceptable reduction following CR should be managed within three weeks to avoid detrimental outcomes. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: L. L. Nowak reports institutional funding via the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Resident Grant, related to this study. M. D. McKee reports royalties or licenses from Stryker, LOWW, Wolters-Kluwer, and Springer, consulting fees from Stryker and Exactech, and is a member of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons nominating committee, all of which are unrelated to this study. E. Schemitsch reports institutional grants from Stryker, Smith & Nephew, Zimmer Biomet and Depuy Synthes, royalties or licenses from Stryker and ITS, consulting fees from Stryker, Smith & Nephew, Amgen, and Sanofi, all of which are unrelated to this study., (© 2024 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)

Comminuted proximal humerus fractures are often repaired by metal plates, but potentially still experience bone refracture, bone "stress shielding," screw perforation, delayed healing, and so forth. This "proof of principle" investigation is the initial step towards the design of a new plate using alternative materials to address some of these problems. Finite element modeling was used to create design graphs for bone stress, plate stress, screw stress, and interfragmentary motion via three different fixations (no, 1, or 2 "kickstand" [KS] screws across the fracture) using a wide range of plate elastic moduli (E P  = 5-200 GPa). Well-known design optimization criteria were used that could minimize bone, plate, and screw failure (i.e., peak stress < ultimate tensile strength), reduce bone "stress shielding" (i.e., bone stress under the new plate ≥ bone stress for an intact humerus, titanium plate, and/or steel plate "control"), and encourage callus growth leading to early healing (i.e., 0.2 mm ≤ axial interfragmentary motion ≤ 1 mm; shear/axial interfragmentary motion ratio <1.6). The findings suggest that a potentially optimal configuration involves the new plate being manufactured from a material with an E P of 5-41.5 GPa with 1 KS screw; but, using no KS screws would cause immediate bone fracture and 2 KS screws would almost certainly lead to delayed healing. A prototype plate might be fabricated using alternative materials suggested for orthopedics and other industries, like fiber-metal laminates, fiber-reinforced polymers, metal foams, pure polymers, shape memory alloys, or 3D-printed porous metals., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The timing of major fracture care in polytrauma patients has a relevant impact on outcomes. Yet, standardized treatment strategies with respect to concomitant injuries are rare. This study aims to provide expert recommendations regarding the timing of major fracture care in the presence of concomitant injuries to the brain, thorax, abdomen, spine/spinal cord, and vasculature, as well as multiple fractures., Methods: This study used the Delphi method supported by a systematic review. The review was conducted in the Medline and EMBASE databases to identify relevant literature on the timing of fracture care for patients with the aforementioned injury patterns. Then, consensus statements were developed by 17 international multidisciplinary experts based on the available evidence. The statements underwent repeated adjustments in online- and in-person meetings and were finally voted on. An agreement of ≥75% was set as the threshold for consensus. The level of evidence of the identified publications was rated using the GRADE approach., Results: A total of 12,476 publications were identified, and 73 were included. The majority of publications recommended early surgery (47/73). The threshold for early surgery was set within 24 hours in 45 publications. The expert panel developed 20 consensus statements and consensus >90% was achieved for all, with 15 reaching 100%. These statements define conditions and exceptions for early definitive fracture care in the presence of traumatic brain injury (n = 5), abdominal trauma (n = 4), thoracic trauma (n = 3), multiple extremity fractures (n = 3), spinal (cord) injuries (n = 3), and vascular injuries (n = 2)., Conclusion: A total of 20 statements were developed on the timing of fracture fixation in patients with associated injuries. All statements agree that major fracture care should be initiated within 24 hours of admission and completed within that timeframe unless the clinical status or severe associated issues prevent the patient from going to the operating room., Level of Evidence: Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis; Level IV., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)

Bone fracture plates are usually made from titanium alloy or stainless steel, which are much stiffer than bone. However, overly stiff plates can restrict axial interfragmentary motion at the fracture leading to delayed callus formation and healing, as well as causing bone "stress shielding" under the plate leading to bone atrophy, bone resorption, and plate loosening. Consequently, there have been many prior efforts to develop nonmetallic bone fracture plates with customized material properties using synthetic fibers (e.g., aramid, carbon, glass) in polymer resin. Even so, plant fibers (e.g., flax, roselle, sisal) offer additional advantages over synthetic fibers, such as availability, biodegradability, less toxicity during processing, lower financial cost, and recyclability. As such, there is an emerging interest in using plant fibers alone, or combined with synthetic fibers, to reinforce polymers for various applications. Thus, this is the first review article on the material properties and engineering performance of innovative bone fracture plates made from composite materials reinforced by plant fibers alone or supplemented using synthetic fibers. This article presents material-level fiber properties (e.g., elastic modulus, ultimate strength), material-level plate properties (e.g., fatigue strength, impact toughness), and bone-plate engineering performance (e.g., overall stiffness, plate stress), as well as discussing general findings, study quality, and future work. This article may help engineers and surgeons to design, fabricate, analyze, and utilize novel bone fracture plates.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a dreaded and unpredictable complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). In addition to causing substantial morbidity, PJI may contribute to long-term mortality risk. Our objective was to determine the long-term mortality risk associated with PJI following THA., Methods: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included adult patients (≥18 years old) in Ontario, Canada, who underwent their first primary elective THA for arthritis between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2021. The primary outcome was death within 10 years after the index THA. Mortality was compared between propensity-score-matched groups (PJI within 1 year after surgery versus no PJI within 1 year after surgery) with use of survival analyses. Patients who died within 1 year after surgery were excluded to avoid immortal time bias., Results: A total of 175,432 patients (95,883 [54.7%] women) with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 67 ± 11.4 years underwent primary THA during the study period. Of these, 868 patients (0.49%) underwent surgery for a PJI of the replaced joint within 1 year after the index procedure. After matching, patients with a PJI within the first year had a significantly higher 10-year mortality rate than their counterparts (11.4% [94 of 827 patients] versus 2.2% [18 of 827 patients]; absolute risk difference, 9.19% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.81% to 11.6%]; hazard ratio, 5.49 [95% CI, 3.32 to 9.09])., Conclusions: PJI within 1 year after surgery is associated with over a fivefold increased risk of mortality within 10 years. The findings of this study underscore the importance of prioritizing efforts related to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PJIs., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: This study was supported by a strategic operating grant (21-0000000176) from the Arthritis Society and by ICES, an independent research institute funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. The funders and data providers had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H998 )., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

As North America is largely industrialized with a variety of available private transportation options, trauma is a common occurrence, resulting in significant burdens of disability and costs to the health care system. To meet increasing trauma care needs, there is a robust organization of trauma and rehabilitation systems, particularly within the United States and Canada. The American and Canadian health care systems share multiple similarities, including well-equipped Level I trauma centers, specialized inpatient rehabilitation units for polytrauma patients, and thorough evaluations for recovery and post-discharge placement. However, they also have several key differences. In Canada, the criteria for admission to inpatient rehabilitation vary by location, and inpatient rehabilitation is universally accessible, whereas outpatient rehabilitation services are generally not covered by insurance. In the United States, these admission criteria for post-acute inpatient rehabilitation are standardized, and both inpatient and outpatient services are covered by private and government-funded insurance with varying durations. Overall, both health care systems face challenges in post-acute rehabilitation, including benefit limitations and limited provider access in rural areas, and must continue to evolve to meet the rehabilitation needs of injured patients as they reintegrate into their communities., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

Background: This study experimentally validated a computationally optimized screw number and screw distribution far cortical locking distal femur fracture plate and compared the results to traditional implants., Methods: 24 artificial femurs were osteotomized with a 10 mm fracture gap 60 mm proximal to the intercondylar notch. Three fixation constructs were used. (i) Standard locking plates secured with three far cortical locking screws inserted according to a previously optimized distribution in the femur shaft (n = 8). (ii) Standard locking plates secured with four standard locking screws inserted in alternating plate holes in the femur shaft (n = 8). (iii) Retrograde intramedullary nail secured proximally with one anterior-posterior screw and distally with two oblique screws (n = 8). Axial hip forces (700 and 2800 N) were applied while measuring axial interfragmentary motion, shear interfragmentary motion, and overall stiffness., Findings: Experimental far cortical locking plate results compared well to published computational findings. Far cortical locking femurs contained the highest axial motion within the potential ideal range of 0.2-1 mm and a sheer-to-axial motion ratio < 1.6 at toe-touch weight-bearing (700 N). At full weight-bearing (2800 N), Standard locking-plated femurs had the only axial motion within 0.2-1 mm but had an excess shear-to-axial motion ratio. Nail-implanted femurs underperformed at both forces., Interpretation: For toe-touch weight-bearing, the far cortical locking construct provided optimal biomechanics to allow moderate motion, which has been suggested to encourage early callus formation. Conversely, at full weight-bearing, the standard locking construct offered the biomechanical advantage on fracture motion., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Emil H. Schemitsch previously received personal fees and research support from Zimmer Biomet. Radovan Zdero previously received “in kind” research support from Zimmer Biomet. No conflicts exist for the other authors., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) presents a formidable challenge to orthopaedic surgeons due to its complex and diverse manifestations. Accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance, as even mild pain following joint replacement surgery may indicate PJI in the absence of a definitive gold standard diagnostic test. Numerous diagnostic modalities have been suggested in the literature, and international societies have continually updated diagnostic criteria for this debilitating complication. This review article aims to comprehensively examine the latest evidence-based approaches for diagnosing PJI. Through a thorough analysis of current literature, we explore promising diagnostic strategies that have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying PJI. These strategies encompass the utilization of laboratory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), alongside imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and leukocyte scintigraphy. Additionally, we highlight the importance of synovial fluid analysis, including the potential role of alpha-defensin as a biomarker, and examine evolving international diagnostic criteria to standardize and improve diagnostic accuracy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests

The goal of this article was to review studies on distal humerus fracture plates (DHFPs) to understand the biomechanical influence of systematically changing the plate or screw variables. The problem is that DHFPs are commonly used surgically, although complications can still occur, and it is unclear if implant configurations are always optimized using biomechanical criteria. A systematic search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify English-language biomechanical optimization studies of DHFPs that parametrically altered plate and/or screw variables to analyze their influence on engineering performance. Intraarticular and extraarticular fracture (EAF) data were separated and organized under commonly used biomechanical outcome metrics. The results identified 52 eligible DHFP studies, which evaluated various plate and screw variables. The most common plate variables evaluated were geometry, hole type, number, and position. Fewer studies assessed screw variables, with number and angle being the most common. However, no studies examined nonmetallic materials for plates or screws, which may be of interest in future research. Also, articles used various combinations of biomechanical outcome metrics, such as interfragmentary fracture motion, bone, plate, or screw stress, number of loading cycles to failure, and overall stiffness (Os) or failure strength (Fs). However, no study evaluated the bone stress under the plate to examine bone "stress shielding," which may impact bone health clinically. Surgeons treating intraarticular and extraarticular distal humerus fractures should seriously consider two precontoured, long, thick, locked, and parallel plates that are secured by long, thick, and plate-to-plate screws that are located at staggered levels along the proximal parts of the plates, as well as an extra transfracture plate screw. Also, research engineers could improve new studies by perusing recommendations in future work (e.g., studying alternative nonmetallic materials or "stress shielding"), clinical ramifications (e.g., benefits of locked plates), and study quality (e.g., experimental validation of computational studies)., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Radovan Zdero et al.)

Bone fracture plates are usually made from steel or titanium, which are much stiffer than cortical bone. This may cause bone 'stress shielding' (i.e. bone resorption leading to plate loosening) and delayed fracture healing (i.e. fracture motion is less than needed to stimulate callus formation at the fracture). Thus, the authors previously designed, fabricated, and mechanically tested novel 'hybrid' composites made from inorganic and organic materials as potential bone fracture plates that are more flexible to reduce these negative effects. This is the first study to measure the cytotoxicity of these composites via the survival of rat cells. Cubes of carbon fiber/flax fiber/epoxy and glass fiber/flax fiber/epoxy had better cell survival vs. Kevlar fiber/flax fiber/epoxy (57% and 58% vs. 50%). Layers and powders made of carbon fiber/epoxy and glass fiber/epoxy had higher cell survival than Kevlar fiber/epoxy (96%-100% and 100% vs. 39%-90%). The presence of flax fibers usually decreased cell survival. Thus, carbon and glass fiber composites (with or without flax fibers), but not Kevlar fiber composites (with or without flax fibers), may potentially be used for bone fracture plates., (© 2024 IOP Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Underemployment is a reality for many new graduates, who accept locum or part-time work as an alternative to unemployment because of lack of opportunities. We sought to analyze orthopedic surgeons' Ontario Health Insurance Program (OHIP) billing data over a 20-year period as a proxy of practice patterns and hypothesized that billing in the first 6 years of practice would be affected by underemployment and locum., Methods: We analyzed the annual average billing totals of orthopedic surgeons, broken down by year of graduation, year of billings, and number of surgeons billing in that year. We analyzed public census data of the Ontario population size as a proxy of orthopedic demand., Results: A 2019 cross-sectional analysis showed that around 15 surgeons per graduating year were billing in Ontario from the 1995 to 2016 cohorts, while 2017 and 2018 saw an increase to 30 and 36 actively billing surgeons, respectively. The number returned to more historical numbers in 2019, with 20 actively billing surgeons. For those surgeons billing in Ontario, billing trends have been roughly stable, with average billings increasing each year for the first 6 years in practice ( p < 0.001). Year of graduation did not have an effect on the first 6 years of billings ( p > 0.5). Billings were stable after 6 years in practice ( p > 0.09)., Conclusion: The Ontario health care system has not expanded to support more orthopedic surgeons despite the aging and growing population; despite our growing population, the number of surgeons being trained and retained has not matched this growth. Further research needs to be done to guide optimal health human resource decision-making., Competing Interests: Competing interests:: None declared., (© 2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Objectives: Limb amputation is a possible outcome of acute compartment syndrome. We undertook this study to investigate the occurrence of fasciotomy and amputation in patients with tibial fractures in the Ontario adult population, aiming to evaluate variables that may be associated with each of these outcomes., Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study (April 1, 2003-March 31, 2016)., Setting: Canadian province of Ontario., Participants: Patients with tibial fracture, aged 14 years and older., Interventions: Fasciotomy after tibial fracture., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were fasciotomy and amputation within 1 year of fasciotomy. Secondary outcomes included repeat surgery, new-onset renal failure, and mortality, all within 30 days of fasciotomy., Results: We identified 76,299 patients with tibial fracture; the mean (SD) age was 47 (21) years. Fasciotomy was performed in 1303 patients (1.7%); of these, 76% were male and 24% female. Patients who were younger, male, or experienced polytrauma were significantly more likely to undergo fasciotomy. Limb amputation occurred in 4.3% of patients undergoing fasciotomy, as compared with 0.5% in those without fasciotomy; older age, male sex, presence of polytrauma, and fasciotomy were associated with an increased risk of amputation (age odds ratio [OR] of 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.03], P < 0.0001; sex OR of 2.04 [95% CI, 1.63-2.55], P < 0.0001; polytrauma OR of 9.37 [95% CI, 7.64-11.50], P < 0.0001; fasciotomy OR of 4.35 [95% CI, 3.21-5.90], P < 0.0001), as well as repeat surgery within 30 days (sex OR of 1.54 [95% CI, 1.14-2.07], P = 0.0053; polytrauma OR of 4.24 [95% CI, 3.33-5.38], P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Among tibial fracture patients, those who were male and who experienced polytrauma were at significantly higher risk of undergoing fasciotomy and subsequent amputation. Fasciotomy was also significantly associated with risk of amputation, a finding that is likely reflective of the severity of the initial injury., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

Postfracture survival rates provide prognostic information but are rarely reported along with other mortality outcomes in adults aged ≥50 yr. The timing of survival change following a fracture also needs to be further elucidated. This population-based, matched-cohort, retrospective database study examined 98 474 patients (73% women) aged ≥66 yr with an index fracture occurring at an osteoporotic site (hip, clinical vertebral, proximal non-hip non-vertebral [pNHNV], and distal non-hip non-vertebral [dNHNV]) from 2011 to 2015, who were matched (1:1) to nonfracture individuals based on sex, age, and comorbidities. All-cause 1- and 5-yr overall survival and relative survival ratios (RSRs) were assessed, and time trends in survival changes were characterized starting immediately after a fracture. In both sexes, overall survival was markedly decreased over 6 yr of follow-up after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, and as expected, worse survival rates were observed in older patients and males. The lowest 5-yr RSRs were observed after hip fractures in males (66-85 yr, 51.9%-63.9%; ≥86 yr, 34.5%), followed by vertebral fractures in males (66-85 yr, 53.2%-69.4%; ≥86 yr, 35.5%), and hip fractures in females (66-85 yr, 69.8%-79.0%; ≥86 yr, 52.8%). Although RSRs did not decrease as markedly after dNHNV fractures in younger patients, relatively low 5-yr RSRs were observed in females (75.9%) and males (69.5%) aged ≥86 yr. The greatest reduction in survival occurred within the initial month after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, indicating a high relative impact of short-term factors, with survival-reduction effects persisting over time. Therefore, the most critical period for implementing interventions aimed at improving post-fracture prognosis appears to be immediately after a fracture; however, considering the immediate need for introducing such interventions, primary fracture prevention is also crucial to prevent the occurrence of the initial fracture in high-risk patients., Competing Interests: E.S. has received consulting fees from Amgen. J.D.A. has received consulting fees from Amgen, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and Paladin; received research funding from Amgen and Radius; and served on speakers bureaus for Amgen, Gilead, and GlaxoSmithKline. J.P.B. has received research support from Mereo BioPharma, Radius Health, and Servier; has served as a consultant for Amgen, Gilead, Paladin, Pfizer, Servier, and Ultragenyx; and has served on speakers bureaus for Amgen. J.-E.T. has led educational workshops for Allergan; received consulting fees from Amgen, Analytica Laser International, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Edwards Lifesciences, the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC), Evidera, Flatiron, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, PCDI Canada, Pfizer Inc., and Roche; and received research funding from Amgen, Assurex/Myriad, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Edwards Lifesciences, Novo Nordisk, and Sage. G.V., R.J.W., and N.H. are employees of Amgen and own Amgen stock., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

We sought to compare outcomes and reoperation rates for the surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (excluding head-splitting fractures, fracture-dislocations, and isolated greater-tuberosity fractures) in men and women older than 60 years. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane through to Feb. 1, 2022, and included all English-language randomized trials comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment; open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plate versus intramedullary nail; arthroplasty versus ORIF; and reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Outcomes of interest were functional outcomes (e.g., Constant score), pain outcomes (visual analogue scale scores), and reoperation rates for the interventions of interest when available. We rated the quality of the evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. This guideline will benefit patients considering surgical intervention for fractures of the proximal humerus by improving counselling on surgical treatment options and possible outcomes. It will also benefit surgical providers by improving their knowledge of various surgical approaches. Data presented could be used to develop frameworks and tools for shared decision-making.Nous avons cherché à comparer les résultats et les taux de réintervention à la suite d'un traitement chirurgical pour une fracture de l'humérus proximal (excluant les fractures de la tête humérale, les fractures-luxations et les fractures isolées de la grande tubérosité) chez les hommes et les femmes âgés de plus de 60 ans. Nous avons effectué des recherches dans les bases de données MEDLINE, Embase, et Cochrane jusqu'au 1 er février 2022 et avons inclus tous les essais randomisés publiés en anglais comparant différents duos d'interventions : traitements chirurgicaux ou non chirurgicaux; réductions ouvertes avec fixation interne (ROFI) réalisées à l'aide d'une plaque verrouillée ou enclouages centromédullaires; arthroplasties ou ROFI; et arthroplasties inversées de l'épaule ou hémiarthroplasties. Les paramètres d'intérêt étaient la capacité fonctionnelle (p. ex., score de Constant), la douleur (p. ex., échelle analogique visuelle) et le taux de réintervention pour les interventions d'intérêt, selon les données disponibles. Nous avons évalué la qualité des données probantes et la solidité des recommandations à l'aide de l'approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Cette ligne directrice profitera aux patients qui envisagent une intervention chirurgicale après une fracture de l'humérus proximal en améliorant les consultations sur les options de traitement chirurgical et les résultats escomptés. Elle aidera aussi les chirurgiens en améliorant leurs connaissances sur différentes approches chirurgicales. Les données présentées pourraient servir à mettre au point des cadres et des outils pour une prise de décision partagée., Competing Interests: Competing interests:: None declared., (© 2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Geriatric trauma continues to rise, corresponding with the continuing growth of the older population. These fractures continue to expand, demonstrated by the incidence of hip fractures having grown to 1.5 million adults worldwide per year. This patient population and their associated fracture patterns present unique challenges to the surgeon, as well as having a profound economic impact on the health care system. Pharmacologic treatment has focused on prevention, with aging adults having impaired fracture healing in addition to diminished bone mineral density. Intraoperatively, novel ideas to assess fracture reduction to facilitate decreased fracture collapse have recently been explored. Postoperatively, pharmacologic avenues have focused on future fracture prevention, while shared care models between geriatrics and orthopaedics have shown promise regarding decreasing mortality and length of stay. As geriatric trauma continues to grow, it is imperative that we look to optimize all phases of care, from preoperative to postoperative., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

Background: Proximal humerus locked plates (PHLPs) are widely used for fracture surgery. Yet, non-union, malunion, infection, avascular necrosis, screw cut-out (i.e., perforation), fixation failure, and re-operation occur. Most biomechanical investigators compare a specific PHLP configuration to other implants like non-locked plates, nails, wires, and arthroplasties. However, it is unknown whether the PHLP configuration is biomechanically optimal according to some well-known biomechanical criteria. Therefore, this is the first review of the systematic optimization of plate and/or screw design variables for improved PHLP biomechanical performance., Methods: The PubMed website was searched for papers using the terms "proximal humerus" or "shoulder" plus "biomechanics/biomechanical" plus "locked/locking plates". PHLP papers were included if they were (a) optimization studies that systematically varied plate and screw variables to determine their influence on PHLP's biomechanical performance; (b) focused on plate and screw variables rather than augmentation techniques (i.e., extra implants, bone struts, or cement); (c) published after the year 2000 signaling the commercial availability of locked plate technology; and (d) written in English., Results: The 41 eligible papers involved experimental testing and/or finite element modeling. Plate variables investigated by these papers were geometry, material, and/or position, while screw variables studied were number, distribution, angle, size, and/or threads. Numerical outcomes given by these papers included stiffness, strength, fracture motion, bone and implant stress, and/or the number of loading cycles to failure. But, no paper fully optimized any plate or screw variable for a PHLP by simultaneously applying four well-established biomechanical criteria: (a) allow controlled fracture motion for early callus generation; (b) reduce bone and implant stress below the material's ultimate stress to prevent failure; (c) maintain sufficient bone-plate interface stress to reduce bone resorption (i.e., stress shielding); and (d) increase the number of loading cycles before failure for a clinically beneficial lifespan (i.e., fatigue life). Finally, this review made suggestions for future work, identified clinical implications, and assessed the quality of the papers reviewed., Conclusions: Applying biomechanical optimization criteria can assist biomedical engineers in designing or evaluating PHLPs, so orthopaedic surgeons can have superior PHLP constructs for clinical use., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The fixation of periprosthetic fractures remains challenging and controversial. It is important to achieve consensus opinions regarding the management of stable periprosthetic fractures with internal fixation. Key strategies to optimize surgical decision making and fixation and manage complications following these difficult injuries are addressed.

The management of periprosthetic fractures remains challenging and controversial. There continues to be a significant burden of disease and substantial resource implications associated with fractures following total joint arthroplasty. Achieving consensus opinions regarding the prevention and treatment of this problem has important implications given the profound effect on patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary care in the preoperative and postoperative settings is critical, with a specific focus on bone health.

The management of periprosthetic fractures with unstable prosthetic implants is a challenging and commonly encountered problem. It is important to address the many current issues and controversies regarding the treatment of periprosthetic fractures with revision total joint arthroplasty. Key strategies to optimize surgical decision making around the use of arthroplasty and management of complications following these complex injuries will be addressed.

Nonunion and segmental bone defects are complex issues in orthopedic trauma. The use of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), as part of a cell-based therapy for bone healing is a promising approach. In preclinical studies, culture medium (CM) is commonly used to deliver EPCs to the defect site, which has the potential for immunogenicity in humans. The goal of this study was to find an effective and clinically translatable delivery medium for EPCs. Accordingly, this study compared EPCs delivered in CM, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), platelet-poor plasma (PPP), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in a rat model of femoral critical-size defects. Fischer 344 rats (n = 35) were divided into six groups: EPC+CM, EPC+PBS, EPC+PPP, EPC+PRP, PPP alone, and PRP alone. A 5 mm mid-diaphyseal defect was created in the right femur and stabilized with a miniplate. The defect was filled with a gelatin scaffold impregnated with the corresponding treatment. Radiographic, microcomputed tomography and biomechanical analyses were performed. Overall, regardless of the delivery medium, groups that received EPCs had higher radiographic scores and union rates, higher bone volume, and superior biomechanical properties compared to groups treated with PPP or PRP alone. There were no significant differences in any outcomes between EPC subgroups or between PPP and PRP alone. These results suggest that EPCs are effective in treating segmental defects in a rat model of critical-size defects regardless of the delivery medium used. Consequently, PBS could be the optimal medium for delivering EPCs, given its low cost, ease of preparation, accessibility, noninvasiveness, and nonimmunogenic properties., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.)

Currently, there is no established finite element (FE) method to apply physiologically realistic loads and constraints to the humerus. This FE study showed that 2 'simple' methods involving direct head loads, no head constraints, and rigid elbow or mid-length constraints created excessive stresses and bending. However, 2 'intermediate' methods involving direct head loads, but flexible head and elbow constraints, produced lower stresses and bending. Also, 2 'complex' methods involving muscles to generate head loads, plus flexible head and elbow constraints, generated the lowest stresses and moderate bending. This has implications for FE modeling research on intact and implanted humeri.

Biomechanical engineers and physicists commonly employ biological bone for biomechanics studies, since they are good representations of living bone. Yet, there are challenges to using biological bone, such as cost, degradation, disease, ethics, shipping, sourcing, storage, variability, etc. Therefore, the Synbone® company has developed a series of synthetic bones that have been used by biomechanical investigators to offset some drawbacks of biological bone. There have been a number of published biomechanical reports using these bone surrogates for dental, injury, orthopedic, and other applications. But, there is no prior review paper that has summarized the mechanical properties of these synthetic bones in order to understand their general performance or how well they represent biological bone. Thus, the goal of this article was to survey the English-language literature on the mechanical properties of these synthetic bones. Studies were included if they quantitatively (a) characterized previously unknown values for synthetic bone, (b) validated synthetic versus biological bone, and/or (c) optimized synthetic bone performance by varying geometric or material parameters. This review of data, pros, cons, and future work will hopefully assist biomechanical engineers and physicists that use these synthetic bones as they develop experimental testing regimes and computational models., (Copyright © 2023 by ASME.)

Biomechanics investigators are interested in experimentally measuring stresses experienced by dental structures, whole bones, joint replacements, soft tissues, normal limbs, etc. To do so, various experimental methods have been used that are based on acoustic, optical, piezo-resistive, or other principles, like digital image correlation, fiber optic sensors, photo-elasticity, strain gages, ultrasound, etc. Several biomechanical review papers have surveyed these research technologies, but they do not mention thermography. Thermography can identify temperature anomalies indicating low- or high-stress areas on a bone, implant, prosthesis, etc., which may need to be repaired, replaced, or redesigned to avoid damage, degradation, or failure. In addition, thermography can accurately predict a structure's cyclic fatigue strength. Consequently, this article gives an up-to-date survey of the scientific literature on thermography for biomechanical stress analysis. This review (i) describes the basic physics of thermography, thermo-elastic properties of biomaterials, experimental protocols for thermography, advantages, and disadvantages, (ii) surveys published studies on various applications that used thermography for biomechanical stress measurements, and (iii) discusses general findings and future work. This article is intended to inform biomechanics investigators about the potential of thermography for stress analysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Biomechanics researchers often experimentally measure static or fluctuating dynamic contact forces, areas, and stresses at the interface of natural and artificial joints, including the shoulders, elbows, hips, and knees. This information helps explain joint contact mechanics, as well as mechanisms that may contribute to disease, damage, and degradation. Currently, the most common in vitro experimental technique involves a thin pressure-sensitive film inserted into the joint space; but, the film's finite thickness disturbs the joint's ordinary articulation. Similarly, the most common in vivo experimental technique uses video recording of 3D limb motion combined with dynamic analysis of a 3D link-segment model to calculate joint contact force, but this does not provide joint contact area or stress distribution. Moreover, many researchers may be unaware of older or newer alternative techniques that may be more suitable for their particular research application. Thus, this article surveys over 50 years of English-language scientific literature in order to (a) describe the basic working principles, advantages, and disadvantages of each technique, (b) examine the trends among the studies and methods, and (c) make recommendations for future directions. This article will hopefully inform biomechanics investigators about various in vitro and in vivo experimental methods for studying the contact mechanics of joints., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Radovan Zdero et al.)

After a distal humeral injury, olecranon osteotomy (OO) is a traditional way to visualize the distal humerus for performing fracture fixation. In contrast, the current authors previously showed that novel proximal ulna osteotomy (PUO) allows better access to the distal humerus without ligamentous compromise. Therefore, this study biomechanically compared plating repair following OO versus PUO. The left or right ulna from eight matched pairs of human cadaveric elbows were randomly assigned to receive OO or PUO and repaired using pre-contoured titanium plates. Destructive and non-destructive mechanical tests were performed to assess stability. Mechanical tests on OO versus PUO groups yielded average results for ulna cantilever bending stiffness at a 90° elbow angle (29.6 vs 30.5 N/mm, p  = 0.742), triceps tendon pull stiffness at a 90° elbow angle (28.2 vs 24.4 N/mm, p  = 0.051), triceps tendon pull stiffness at a 110° elbow angle (61.9 vs 59.5 N/mm, p  = 0.640), and triceps tendon pull failure load at a 110° elbow angle (1070.1 vs 1359.7 N, p  = 0.078). OO and PUO elbows had similar failure mechanisms, namely, tendon tear or avulsion from the ulna with or without some fracture of the proximal bone fragment, or complete avulsion of the proximal bone fragment from the plate. The similar biomechanical stability (i.e., no statistical difference for 4 of 4 mechanical measurements) and failure mechanisms of OO and PUO plated elbows support the clinical use of PUO as a possible alternative to OO for visualizing the distal humerus.

Biomedical engineers and physicists frequently use human or animal bone for orthopaedic biomechanics research because they are excellent approximations of living bone. But, there are drawbacks to biological bone, like degradation over time, ethical concerns, high financial costs, inter-specimen variability, storage requirements, supplier sourcing, transportation rules, etc. Consequently, since the late 1980s, the Sawbones® company has been one of the world's largest suppliers of artificial bones for biomechanical testing that counteract many disadvantages of biological bone. There have been many published reports using these bone analogs for research on joint replacement, bone fracture fixation, spine surgery, etc. But, there exists no prior review paper on these artificial bones that gives a comprehensive and in-depth look at the numerical data of interest to biomedical engineers and physicists. Thus, this paper critically reviews 25 years of English-language studies on the biomechanical properties of these artificial bones that (a) characterized unknown or unreported values, (b) validated them against biological bone, and/or (c) optimized different design parameters. This survey of data, advantages, disadvantages, and knowledge gaps will hopefully be useful to biomedical engineers and physicists in developing mechanical testing protocols and computational finite element models., (Copyright © 2023 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influences outcome in patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring multiple reoperations., Methods: Using the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures trial data, we categorized patients as those not requiring reoperation, those requiring a single reoperation and those requiring multiple reoperations, and we compared them by nail insertion technique (reamed v. unreamed) and fracture type (open v. closed). We then determined the number of patients whose first reoperation was in response to infection, and we compared other clinical outcomes between the reamed and unreamed groups., Results: Among 1226 patients included in this analysis, 175 (14.27%) experienced a single reoperation and 44 patients (3.59%) underwent multiple reoperations. Nail insertion techniques (reamed v. unreamed) did not play a role in the need to perform multiple reoperations. Seventy-five percent of patients requiring multiple reoperations had open tibial shaft fractures. An equal number of these were reamed and unreamed insertions. The majority of patients had their course complicated by infection and almost 50% of patients whose first reoperation was for infection required more than 2 reoperations for management. The rest required multiple procedures for nonunion or bone loss., Conclusion: Our findings corroborate those of other studies, in which open fracture type rather than nail insertion technique was found to be the cause of morbidity following intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures., Clinical Trial Registration: www., Clinicaltrials: gov, no. NCT00038129., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Emil Schemitsch received research support from Biocomposites and Smith & Nephew. He also received publishing royalties from Saunders/Mosby-Elsevier and Springer and intellectual property royalties from Stryker and Implants for Trauma Surgery (ITS). He was a paid consultant for Acumed, LLC; Amgen Co.; Heron Therapeutics; ITS; Pentopharm; Sanofi–Aventis; Smith & Nephew; Stryker; Swemac and Synthes. He was also an editorial board member for the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma and the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association. He was a board member for the Canadian Orthopaedic Association and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. He also received financial and material support from DePuy (a Johnson & Johnson company), Smith & Nephew, Stryker and Zimmer Biomet. Mohit Bhandari received research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Institutes of Health, Physicians’ Services Incorporated and the United States Department of Defense. He was a paid consultant for AgNovos Healthcare, Sanofi–Aventis and Smith & Nephew and a board member for the International Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. Marc Swiontkowski was a data safety and monitoring board chair for the Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium. David W. Sanders received research support from Arthrex, Inc. and from Stryker, where he was also a paid consultant. He was a board member for the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and an editorial board member with Wolters Kluwer Health– Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Paul Tornetta III received financial and material support and publishing royalties from Wolters Kluwer Health–Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. He received intellectual property royalties from Smith & Nephew. He was also an editorial board member for the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma., (© 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Clinical findings, manufacturer instructions, and surgeon's preferences often dictate the implantation of distal femur locked plates (DFLPs), but healing problems and implant failures still persist. Also, most biomechanical researchers compare a particular DFLP configuration to implants like plates and nails. However, this begs the question: Is this specific DFLP configuration biomechanically optimal to encourage early callus formation, reduce bone and implant failure, and minimize bone "stress shielding"? Consequently, it is crucial to optimize, or characterize, the biomechanical performance (stiffness, strength, fracture micro-motion, bone stress, plate stress) of DFLPs influenced by plate variables (geometry, position, material) and screw variables (distribution, size, number, angle, material). Thus, this article reviews 20 years of biomechanical design optimization studies on DFLPs. As such, Google Scholar and PubMed websites were searched for articles in English published since 2000 using the terms "distal femur plates" or "supracondylar femur plates" plus "biomechanics/biomechanical" and "locked/locking," followed by searching article reference lists. Key numerical outcomes and common trends were identified, such as: (a) plate cross-sectional area moment of inertia can be enlarged to lower plate stress at the fracture; (b) plate material has a larger influence on plate stress than plate thickness, buttress screws, and inserts for empty plate holes; (c) screw distribution has a major influence on fracture micro-motion, etc. Recommendations for future work and clinical implications are then provided, such as: (a) simultaneously optimizing fracture micro-motion for early healing, reducing bone and implant stresses to prevent re-injury, lowering "stress shielding" to avoid bone resorption, and ensuring adequate fatigue life; (b) examining alternate non-metallic materials for plates and screws; (c) assessing the influence of condylar screw number, distribution, and angulation, etc. This information can benefit biomedical engineers in designing or evaluating DFLPs, as well as orthopedic surgeons in choosing the best DFLPs for their patients.

Severe open fractures present challenges to orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, with increased risks of significant complications. Although different global regions have different resources and systems, there continue to be many consistent approaches to open fracture care. Management of these complex injures continues to evolve in areas ranging from timing of initial operative debridement to the management of critical-sized bone defects. This review, compiled by representative members of the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association, focuses on several critical areas of open fracture management, including antibiotic administration, timing of debridement, bone loss, soft tissue management, and areas of need for future investigation., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

Background: Trends over the past decade suggest a steady increase in the proportion of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed on an outpatient basis. However, the optimal patient selection criteria for outpatient TKA remain unclear. We aimed to describe longitudinal trends in patients selected for outpatient TKA and identify risk factors for 30-day morbidity following inpatient and outpatient TKA., Methods: We identified 379,959 primary TKA patients, 17,170 (4.5%) of whom underwent outpatient surgery from 2012 to 2020 within a large national database. We used regression models to evaluate trends in outpatient TKA, factors associated with undergoing outpatient (versus inpatient) TKA and 30-day morbidity following outpatient and inpatient TKA. We used receiver operating curves to examine cutoff points for continuous risk factors., Results: The proportion of patients undergoing outpatient TKA increased from 0.4% in 2012 to 14.1% in 2020. Younger age, male sex, lower body mass index (BMI), higher hematocrit, and fewer comorbidities were associated with receiving outpatient (versus inpatient) TKA. Variables associated with 30-day morbidity in the outpatient group included older age, chronic dyspnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and higher BMI. The receiver operating curves indicated outpatients aged 68 years and older, or with a BMI of 31.4 or higher were more likely to experience 30-day complications., Conclusion: The proportion of patients undergoing outpatient TKA has been increasing since 2012. Older age (≥68 years), a higher BMI (≥31.4), and comorbidities such as chronic dyspnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and hypertension were associated with an increased odd of 30-day morbidity following outpatient TKA., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Importance: Fractures of the hip have devastating effects on function and quality of life. Intramedullary nails (IMN) are the dominant implant choice for the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip. Higher costs of IMNs and inconclusive benefit in comparison with sliding hip screws (SHSs) convey the need for definitive evidence., Objective: To compare 1-year outcomes of patients with trochanteric fractures treated with the IMN vs an SHS., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 25 international sites across 12 countries. Participants included ambulatory patients aged 18 years and older with low-energy trochanteric (AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] type 31-A1 or 31-A2) fractures. Patient recruitment occurred between January 2012 and January 2016, and patients were followed up for 52 weeks (primary end point). Follow-up was completed in January 2017. The analysis was performed in July 2018 and confirmed in January 2022., Interventions: Surgical fixation with a Gamma3 IMN or an SHS., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL), measured by the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D) at 1-year postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included revision surgical procedure, fracture healing, adverse events, patient mobility (measured by the Parker mobility score), and hip function (measured by the Harris hip score)., Results: In this randomized clinical trial, 850 patients were randomized (mean [range] age, 78.5 [18-102] years; 549 [64.6% female) with trochanteric fractures to undergo fixation with either the IMN (n = 423) or an SHS (n = 427). A total of 621 patients completed follow-up at 1 year postsurgery (304 treated with the IMN [71.9%], 317 treated with an SHS [74.2%]). There were no significant differences between groups in EQ5D scores (mean difference, 0.02 points; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.07 points; P = .42). Furthermore, after adjusting for relevant covariables, there were no between-group differences in EQ5D scores (regression coefficient, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05; P = .81). There were no between-group differences for any secondary outcomes. There were also no significant interactions for fracture stability (β [SE] , 0.01 [0.05]; P = .82) or previous fracture (β [SE], 0.01 [0.10]; P = .88) and treatment group., Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that IMNs for the treatment of trochanteric fractures had similar 1-year outcomes compared with SHSs. These results suggest that the SHS is an acceptable lower-cost alternative for trochanteric fractures of the hip., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01380444.

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a major disease state associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Less than half of the individuals sustaining a low energy hip fracture are diagnosed and treated for the underlying osteoporosis., Objective: A multidisciplinary Canadian hip fracture working group has developed practical recommendations to meet Canadian quality indicators in post hip fracture care., Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted to identify and synthesize key articles on post hip fracture orthogeriatric care for each of the individual sections and develop recommendations. These recommendations are based on the best evidence available today., Conclusion: Recommendations are anticipated to reduce recurrent fractures, improve mobility and healthcare outcomes post hip fracture, and reduce healthcare costs. Key messages to enhance postoperative care are also provided., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Aims: Using data from the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemiarthroplasty (HEALTH) trial, we sought to determine if a difference in functional outcomes exists between monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA)., Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of patients aged 50 years or older with a displaced femoral neck fracture who were enrolled in the HEALTH trial and underwent monopolar and bipolar HA. Scores from the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and (MCS) were compared between the two HA groups using a propensity score-weighted analysis., Results: Of 746 HAs performed in the HEALTH trial, 404 were bipolar prostheses and 342 were unipolar. After propensity score weighting, adequate balance between the bipolar and unipolar groups was obtained as shown by standardized mean differences less than 0.1 for each covariable. A total of 24 months after HA, the total WOMAC score and its subcomponents showed no statistically significant difference between the unipolar and bipolar groups. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found in the PCS and MCS scores of the SF-12 questionnaire. In participants aged 70 years and younger, no difference was found in any of the functional outcomes., Conclusion: From the results of this study, the use of bipolar HA over unipolar design does not provide superior functional outcomes at 24 months postoperatively. The theoretical advantage of reduced acetabular wear with bipolar designs does not appear to influence functional outcomes in the first two years postoperatively., Competing Interests: The authors report the following, all of which are unrelated to this article: R. W. Poolman reports research support from Lima and Link Orthopaedics, being a board or committee member of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association, and on the dditorial or governing board of My Ortho Evidence. F. Frihagen declares being a paid presenter or speaker for Amgen and Zimmer, and being a board or committee member for AAOS. M. Bhandari reports research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Institutes of Health, and US Department of Defense, and being a paid consultant for AgNovos Healthcare, Sanofi-Aventis, and Smith & Nephew, and being a board or committee member for the International Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. S. Sprague declares being an employee of Global Research Solutions and McMaster University, and being on the editorial or governing board of BMC Women's Health. E. Schemitsch discloses being a paid consultant for Acumed, Amgen, Heron Therapeutics, ITS, Pentopharm, Sanofi-Aventis, and Swemac, getting other financial or material support from DePuy, Saunders/Mosby-Elsevier, Stryker, and Zimmer, being a board or committee member of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and on the editorial or governing board of the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma., (© 2023 Author(s) et al.)

At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were "Mechanics versus Biology-Which is 'More Important' to Consider?" "Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization-Which Way Should I Go?" and "Sawbones versus Cadaver Models-What Should I Believe Most?" These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear. The lack of clarity in this space has led to a spectrum of research with the common goal of helping surgeons make good decisions. Before reading further, the reader should understand that the questions posed in the debate titles are unanswerable and might represent a false choice. Instead, the reader should appreciate that the debates were held to gain a more thorough understanding of these topics based on the current state of the art of experimental and clinical studies, by using an engaging and thought-provoking format., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

To develop prediction models using machine-learning (ML) algorithms for 90-day and one-year mortality prediction in femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients aged 50 years or older based on the Hip fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip arthroplasty versus Hemiarthroplasty (HEALTH) and Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trials. This study included 2,388 patients from the HEALTH and FAITH trials, with 90-day and one-year mortality proportions of 3.0% (71/2,388) and 6.4% (153/2,388), respectively. The mean age was 75.9 years (SD 10.8) and 65.9% of patients (1,574/2,388) were female. The algorithms included patient and injury characteristics. Six algorithms were developed, internally validated and evaluated across discrimination (c-statistic; discriminative ability between those with risk of mortality and those without), calibration (observed outcome compared to the predicted probability), and the Brier score (composite of discrimination and calibration). The developed algorithms distinguished between patients at high and low risk for 90-day and one-year mortality. The penalized logistic regression algorithm had the best performance metrics for both 90-day (c-statistic 0.80, calibration slope 0.95, calibration intercept -0.06, and Brier score 0.039) and one-year (c-statistic 0.76, calibration slope 0.86, calibration intercept -0.20, and Brier score 0.074) mortality prediction in the hold-out set. Using high-quality data, the ML-based prediction models accurately predicted 90-day and one-year mortality in patients aged 50 years or older with a FNF. The final models must be externally validated to assess generalizability to other populations, and prospectively evaluated in the process of shared decision-making., Competing Interests: None declared., (© 2023 Author(s) et al.)

Objectives: Differences in function, pain, and reoperation rates were compared between the following treatment options: (1) operative vs. nonoperative treatment and (2) various surgical treatments including open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)., Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through February 1, 2022. All English-language randomized trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a control group in patients 18 years or older were included., Data Extraction: Demographic data, functional and pain scores and re-operation rates were extracted. Study quality was determined with the Cochran risk of bias tool and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Heterogeneity was determined with the I-squared statistic., Data Synthesis: Meta-analysis of included studies using mean difference and odds ratios where appropriate., Conclusions: Surgical treatment with either locked plates or HA results in similar functional scores and pain outcomes as nonoperative treatment, although plates were associated with higher reoperation rates in 3-part and 4-part fractures. In 3-part and 4-part fractures, RSA results in higher function and pain scores compared with HA. Further high-quality trials should focus on RSA, and further study is required to better define the role of open reduction internal fixation in the younger patient population., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The diagnosis and management of compartment syndrome remains challenging and controversial. There continues to be a significant burden of disease and substantial resource implications associated with fractures complicated by compartment syndrome. Achieving consensus opinions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of this problem has important implications given the profound effect on patient outcomes.

Introduction: Open fractures represent a major source of morbidity. Surgical site infections (SSIs) after open fractures are associated with a high rate of reoperations and hospitalizations, which are associated with a lower health-related quality of life. Early antibiotic delivery, typically chosen through an assessment of the size and contamination of the wound, has been shown to be an effective technique to reduce the risk of SSI in open fractures. The Gustilo-Anderson classification (GAC) was devised as a grading system of open fractures after a complete operative debridement of the wound had been undertaken but is commonly used preoperatively to help with the choice of initial antibiotics. Incorrect preoperative GAC, leading to less aggressive initial management, may influence the risk of SSI after open fracture. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) how often the GAC changed from the initial to definitive grading, (2) the injury and patient characteristics associated with increases and decreases of the GAC, and (3) whether a change in GAC was associated with an increased risk of SSI., Methods: Using data from the FLOW trial, a large multicenter randomized study, we used descriptive statistics to quantify how frequently the GAC changed from the initial to definitive grading. We used regression models to determine which injury and patient characteristics were associated with increases and decreases in GAC and whether a change in GAC was associated with SSI., Results: Of the 2420 participants included, 305 participants had their preoperative GAC change (12.6%). The factors associated with upgrading the GAC (from preoperative score to the definitive assessment) included fracture sites other than the tibia, bone loss at presentation, width of wound, length of wound, and skin loss at presentation. However, initial misclassification of type III fractures as type II fractures was not associated with an increased risk of SSI ( P = 0.14)., Conclusions: When treating patients with open fracture wounds, surgeons should consider that 12% of all injuries may initially be misclassified when using the GAC, particularly fractures that have bone loss at presentation or those located in sites different than the tibia. However, even in misclassified fractures, it did not seem to increase the risk of SSI., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

Background: Femoral neck fractures are common and are frequently treated with internal fixation. A major disadvantage of internal fixation is the substantially high number of conversions to arthroplasty because of nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, or implant failure. A clinical prediction model identifying patients at high risk of conversion to arthroplasty may help clinicians in selecting patients who could have benefited from arthroplasty initially., Question/purpose: What is the predictive performance of a machine-learning (ML) algorithm to predict conversion to arthroplasty within 24 months after internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures?, Methods: We included 875 patients from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial. The FAITH trial consisted of patients with low-energy femoral neck fractures who were randomly assigned to receive a sliding hip screw or cancellous screws for internal fixation. Of these patients, 18% (155 of 875) underwent conversion to THA or hemiarthroplasty within the first 24 months. All patients were randomly divided into a training set (80%) and test set (20%). First, we identified 27 potential patient and fracture characteristics that may have been associated with our primary outcome, based on biomechanical rationale and previous studies. Then, random forest algorithms (an ML learning, decision tree-based algorithm that selects variables) identified 10 predictors of conversion: BMI, cardiac disease, Garden classification, use of cardiac medication, use of pulmonary medication, age, lung disease, osteoarthritis, sex, and the level of the fracture line. Based on these variables, five different ML algorithms were trained to identify patterns related to conversion. The predictive performance of these trained ML algorithms was assessed on the training and test sets based on the following performance measures: (1) discrimination (the model's ability to distinguish patients who had conversion from those who did not; expressed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]), (2) calibration (the plotted estimated versus the observed probabilities; expressed with the calibration curve intercept and slope), and (3) the overall model performance (Brier score: a composite of discrimination and calibration)., Results: None of the five ML algorithms performed well in predicting conversion to arthroplasty in the training set and the test set; AUCs of the algorithms in the training set ranged from 0.57 to 0.64, slopes of calibration plots ranged from 0.53 to 0.82, calibration intercepts ranged from -0.04 to 0.05, and Brier scores ranged from 0.14 to 0.15. The algorithms were further evaluated in the test set; AUCs ranged from 0.49 to 0.73, calibration slopes ranged from 0.17 to 1.29, calibration intercepts ranged from -1.28 to 0.34, and Brier scores ranged from 0.13 to 0.15., Conclusion: The predictive performance of the trained algorithms was poor, despite the use of one of the best datasets available worldwide on this subject. If the current dataset consisted of different variables or more patients, the performance may have been better. Also, various reasons for conversion to arthroplasty were pooled in this study, but the separate prediction of underlying pathology (such as, avascular necrosis or nonunion) may be more precise. Finally, it may be possible that it is inherently difficult to predict conversion to arthroplasty based on preoperative variables alone. Therefore, future studies should aim to include more variables and to differentiate between the various reasons for arthroplasty., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Fragility fractures of the hip are known to be followed frequently by subsequent fragility fractures, including second hip fractures. Data on subsequent fractures are available for aggregated index femoral neck and intertrochanteric femoral fractures, grouped generically as hip fractures, but not specifically for femoral neck fractures. There is increasing recognition that a subsequent fracture often occurs early after a hip fracture in the elderly, creating an emphasis on the concept of "imminent fracture risk." Since 2000, there have been many reports on the care gap in interventions after a fragility fracture, with concern regarding the slow uptake of appropriate systemic treatments designed to prevent a subsequent fracture in high-risk patients., Methods: As planned a priori, we performed an analysis of subsequent fractures after an index femoral neck fracture in 2 prospective clinical trials involving 2,520 patients from 90 sites on 5 continents. We recorded the incidence and time of occurrence of all secondary fragility fractures as well as the reported use of bone-protective medication in all subjects., Results: In the 24 months following the index femoral neck fracture, 226 (9.0%) of 2,520 patients sustained at least 1 subsequent fragility fracture, including 113 hip fractures (4.5%). The median interval from the index fracture to a subsequent fracture was approximately 9.0 months. Only 25.2% (634) of the 2,520 patients reported using bone-protective medications at any time during follow-up. Female patients, those with nondisplaced index fractures, and those treated with arthroplasty, were more likely to have received protective medication., Conclusions: Subsequent fractures, including second hip fractures, occurred frequently and early following an index femoral neck fracture in 2 large global cohorts. Interventions to prevent a subsequent fracture were instituted in only 1 of 4 patients, even though a focused directive was included in both study protocols., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H218 )., (Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Wait times for many elective orthopedic surgical procedures in Ontario have become unacceptably long and substantially exceed the recommended guidelines. As a consequence, many patients experience chronic pain, disability and other poor health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to test a novel, resource-saving redesign of outpatient operating room (OR) services, based on tiered grouping of surgical cases, to maximize health benefits for patients while improving efficiency and decreasing wait times., Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients scheduled to undergo unilateral lower limb procedures that had a low requirement for surgical resources and did not require admission to the hospital (ambulatory surgical services) at an academic hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to a conventional OR group or a high-efficiency (tiered) OR group, in which the intensity of surgical, anesthesia and nursing resources was matched to the procedure and the patient's health status. The tiered OR made use of local anesthesia and a block room rather than general anesthesia. Primary outcomes were costs of surgical services provided and patient health outcomes; secondary outcomes were patient and staff satisfaction with each OR setup., Results: The costs associated with the high-efficiency OR were 60% lower than those associated with the conventional OR (this was primarily due to the streamlining of OR care and elimination of the need to use a postanesthetic care unit), with the same or equivalent patient health outcomes. No differences in patient and staff satisfaction were found between the 2 setups., Conclusion: The use of tiered, ambulatory services for elective orthopedic surgery does not compromise health outcomes and patient satisfaction, and it is associated with substantial cost savings., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Importance: Unstable chest wall injuries have high rates of mortality and morbidity. In the last decade, multiple studies have reported improved outcomes with operative compared with nonoperative treatment. However, to date, an adequately powered, randomized clinical trial to support operative treatment has been lacking., Objective: To compare outcomes of surgical treatment of acute unstable chest wall injuries with nonsurgical management., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted from October 10, 2011, to October 2, 2019, across 15 sites in Canada and the US. Inclusion criteria were patients between the ages of 16 to 85 years with displaced rib fractures with a flail chest or non-flail chest injuries with severe chest wall deformity. Exclusion criteria included patients with significant other injuries that would otherwise require prolonged mechanical ventilation, those medically unfit for surgery, or those who were randomly assigned to study groups after 72 hours of injury. Data were analyzed from March 20, 2019, to March 5, 2021., Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive operative treatment with plate and screws or nonoperative treatment., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was ventilator-free days (VFDs) in the first 28 days after injury. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and rates of complications (pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis, tracheostomy)., Results: A total of 207 patients were included in the analysis (operative group: 108 patients [52.2%]; mean [SD] age, 52.9 [13.5] years; 81 male [75%]; nonoperative group: 99 patients [47.8%]; mean [SD] age, 53.2 [14.3] years; 75 male [76%]). Mean (SD) VFDs were 22.7 (7.5) days for the operative group and 20.6 (9.7) days for the nonoperative group (mean difference, 2.1 days; 95% CI, -0.3 to 4.5 days; P = .09). Mortality was significantly higher in the nonoperative group (6 [6%]) than in the operative group (0%; P = .01). Rates of complications and length of stay were similar between groups. Subgroup analysis of patients who were mechanically ventilated at the time of randomization demonstrated a mean difference of 2.8 (95% CI, 0.1-5.5) VFDs in favor of operative treatment., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that operative treatment of patients with unstable chest wall injuries has modest benefit compared with nonoperative treatment. However, the potential advantage was primarily noted in the subgroup of patients who were ventilated at the time of randomization. No benefit to operative treatment was found in patients who were not ventilated., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01367951.

A vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is an injury to a vertebra of the spine affecting the cortical walls and/or middle cancellous section. The most common risk factor for a VCF is osteoporosis, thus predisposing the elderly and postmenopausal women to this injury. Clinical consequences include loss of vertebral height, kyphotic deformity, altered stance, back pain, reduced mobility, reduced abdominal space, and reduced thoracic space, as well as early mortality. To restore vertebral mechanical stability, overall spine function, and patient quality of life, the original percutaneous surgical intervention has been vertebroplasty, whereby bone cement is injected into the affected vertebra. Because vertebroplasty cannot fully restore vertebral height, newer surgical techniques have been developed, such as kyphoplasty, stents, jacks, coils, and cubes. But, relatively few studies have experimentally assessed the biomechanical performance of these newer procedures. This article reviews over 20 years of scientific literature that has experimentally evaluated the biomechanics of percutaneous VCF repair methods. Specifically, this article describes the basic operating principles of the repair methods, the study protocols used to experimentally assess their biomechanical performance, and the actual biomechanical data measured, as well as giving a number of recommendations for future research directions., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Sairam Gajavelli et al.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of discharge timing on 30-day complication rates following total hip arthroplasty., Methods: We identified patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty between 2011 and 2017 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Using propensity score matching, we matched patients who were discharged from the hospital on the day of surgery to those discharged on postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine if the rates of complications and readmission differed depending on length of stay., Results: We identified 141 594 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (average age 64.7 [standard deviation (SD) 11.4] yr) from the NSQIP database. The average length of stay was 2.3 days and decreased from 2.8 (SD 0.7) days in 2011 to 1.9 (0.9) days in 2017. The adjusted odds of a major complication increased by 1.33 (1.09-1.61) and 1.41 (1.05-2.21) for patients discharged on postoperative day 3 and 4, respectively, compared with patients discharged on postoperative day 2. Similarly, the adjusted odds of a minor complication increased by 1.22 (1.03-1.43) and 1.58 (1.11-2.26) for patients discharged on postoperative days 3 and 4, respectively, compared with those discharged on postoperative day 2. We found no difference in the risk of major or minor complications between patients discharged on the day of surgery or postoperative day 1 compared with patients discharged on postoperative day 2. We also found that a length of stay of 3 or 4 days increased the risk of readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.29, and OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.85, respectively) compared with a length of stay of 2 days., Conclusion: Our data suggest that discharge on postoperative days 0-2 is associated with the lowest risk of 30-day complications following total hip arthroplasty. These findings support early discharge after total hip arthroplasty; however, more prospective clinical data are required to determine the optimal length of stay following total hip arthroplasty., Competing Interests: Competing interests: E. Schemitsch has received consulting fees from Stryker, Smith & Nephew and Depuy Synthes and institutional research support from Stryker, Zimmer, Depuy Synthes and Smith & Nephew. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the functional results in a fitter subgroup of participants in the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemiarthroplasty (HEALTH) trial to determine whether there was an advantage of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemiarthroplasty (HA) in this population., Methods: We performed a post hoc exploratory analysis of a fitter cohort of patients from the HEALTH trial. Participants were aged over 50 years and had sustained a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF). The fittest participant cohort was defined as participants aged 70 years or younger, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II, independent walkers prior to fracture, and living at home prior to fracture. Multilevel models were used to estimate the effect of THA versus HA on functional outcomes. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the definition of the fittest participant cohort was performed., Results: There were 143 patients included in the fittest cohort. Mean age was 66 years (SD 4.5) and 103 were female (72%). No clinically relevant differences were found between the treatment groups in the primary and sensitivity analyses., Conclusion: This analysis found no differences in functional outcomes between HA and THA within two years of displaced low-energy FNF in a subgroup analysis of the fittest HEALTH patients. These findings suggest that very few patients above 50 years of age benefit in a clinically meaningful way from a THA versus a HA early after injury.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open  2022;3(8):611-617.

Background: To describe longitudinal trends in patients with obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the impact on complications., Methods: We identified primary TKA patients between 2006 and 2017 within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We recorded patient demographics and 30-day complications. We labeled those with an obese Body Mass Index (BMI ≥30), hypertension, and diabetes as having MetS. We used regression to evaluate trends in BMI and complications over time and variables associated with the odds of complication., Results: We identified 270,846 TKA patients, 63.71% of which were obese (n = 172,333), 15.21% morbidly obese (n = 41,130), and 12.37% met the criteria for MetS (n = 33,470). Mean BMI increased by 0.03 per year (0.02-0.05). Despite this, the odds of adverse events in obese patients decreased: major complications by 0.94 (0.93-0.96) and minor complications by 0.94 (0.93-0.95). The proportion of patients with MetS remained stable; however, we found improvements in major (0.94 [0.91-0.97]) and minor complications (0.97 [0.94-1.00]) over time. MetS components (hypertension, diabetes, and BMI ≥40) were associated with major and minor complications in obese patients, while neuraxial anesthesia lowered the odds of major complications in obese patients (0.87 [0.81-0.92])., Conclusion: Mean BMI in primary TKA patients increased from 2006 to 2017. MetS components diabetes and hypertension elevated the odds of complications in obese patients. Rates of complications in patients with obesity and MetS exhibited a longitudinal decline. These findings may reflect increased awareness and improved management of these patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The induced membrane technique (IMT) is a two-stage surgical procedure used to treat fracture nonunion and bone defects. Although there is an increasing number of animal studies investigating the IMT, few have examined the outcomes of bone healing after a second stage grafting procedure. This study aimed at comparing two bone grafting procedures, as part of the IMT, in order to establish a rat model providing consistent healing outcomes., Methods: In male Fischer 344 rats, we created a 5 mm defect in the right femur, stabilized the bone with a plate and screws, and inserted a polymethylmethacrylate spacer into the defect. Four weeks later, the spacer was removed. Bone graft was harvested from a donor rat and placed into the defect, followed by membrane and wound closure. Experiments were conducted in two groups. In group 1 (n = 11), the bone graft contained a variable amount of cortical and cancellous bone, the time from donor euthanasia to grafting was up to 240 min, and one donor rat provided graft for 5-6 recipients. In group 2 (n = 12), we reduced the contribution of cortical bone to the graft, included bone marrow, and kept donor euthanasia to grafting time under 150 min. One donor was used per 3-4 recipients. The volume of graft per recipient and all other elements of the protocol were the same across groups. Bone healing at 12 weeks post grafting was compared radiographically by two orthopaedic surgeons in a blinded fashion, based on union status and a modified Lane & Sandhu score., Results: Healing rates improved from 36.4% in Group 1 to 91.6% in Group 2. There was a significant relationship between the methods and resulting union status (p = 0.004). The odds of achieving full union were significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (odds ratio=19.25, 95% confidence interval [1.77-209.55]; p = 0.009). The average radiographic score was also significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.005)., Conclusion: The revised bone grafting method significantly improved the healing outcomes and contributed to establishing a consistent rat model of the IMT. This model can benefit preclinical investigations by allowing for reliable and clinically-relevant comparisons., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Comminuted proximal tibia fractures are an ongoing surgical challenge. This "proof of concept" study is the first step in designing a new percutaneous plate for this injury under toe-touch weight-bearing as prescribed after surgery. Finite element simulations generated design curves for overall stiffness, bone and implant stress, and interfragmentary motion using 3 fixations (no, 1, or 2 "kickstand" (KS) screws across the fracture gap) over a range of plate elastic moduli (E P  = 5 to 200 GPa). Combining well-established optimization criteria to enhance callus formation (i.e. 0.2 mm ≤ axial interfragmentary motion ≤ 1 mm; shear / axial interfragmentary motion ratio < 1.6), lessen stress shielding (i.e. bone stress under the proposed plate > bone stress under a traditional titanium or steel plate), and reduce steel screw breakage (i.e. screw max stress < ultimate tensile stress of steel) resulted in plate design recommendations: 172.6 ≤ E P < 200 GPa (no KS screw), 79.8 ≤ E P < 100 GPa (1 KS screw), and 4.9 ≤ E P < 100 GPa (2 KS screws). A prototype plate could be made from materials currently used or proposed for orthopaedics, such as polymers, fiber-reinforced polymers, fiber metal laminates, metal foams, or shape memory alloys., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: To (1) identify predictors of subsequent surgery after initial treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) and (2) generate valid risk prediction tools to predict subsequent surgery., Methods: We identified patients ≥50 years with PHF from 2004 to 2015 using health data sets in Ontario, Canada. We used procedural codes to classify patients into treatment groups of (1) surgical fixation, (2) shoulder replacement, and (3) conservative. We used procedural and diagnosis codes to capture subsequent surgery within 2 years after fracture. We developed regression models for two-thirds of each group to identify predictors of subsequent surgery and the regression equations to develop risk tools to predict subsequent surgery. We used the final third of each cohort to evaluate the discriminative ability of the risk tools using c-statistics., Results: We identified 20,897 patients with PHF, 2414 treated with fixation, 1065 with replacement, and 17,418 treated conservatively. Predictors of reoperation after fixation included bone grafting and nail or wire fixation versus plate fixation, whereas poor bone quality was associated with reoperation after initial replacement. In conservatively treated patients, more comorbidities were associated with subsequent surgery, whereas age 70+ and discharge home after presentation lowered the odds of subsequent surgery. The risk tools were able to discriminate with c-statistics of 0.75-0.88 (derivation) and 0.51-0.79 (validation)., Conclusions: Our risk tools showed good to strong discriminative ability for patients treated conservatively and with fixation. These data may be used as the foundation to develop a clinically informative tool., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)