Search

Background: Implications of life-long, perceived discrimination on nutrient intake during the preconception period are unclear., Objective: The objective is to identify associations between perceived discrimination and consumption of specific nutrients associated with risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes., Design: This is a secondary data analysis of the prospective Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (NuMom2b) cohort. Participants completed a Block Food Frequency Questionnaire assessing diet in the three months prior to pregnancy and a Krieger Experiences of Discrimination Scale assessing personal encounters of discrimination., Participants/setting: Participants were recruited from eight clinical centers across the US between 2010-2013. Each participant completed the Food Frequency and Krieger questionnaires and self-identified as belonging to a minoritized racial or ethnic group for this analysis (n=2457)., Main Outcome Measures: Main outcomes include reported total energy and macronutrient intake, percent of energy from macronutrients, saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (FA), added sugar, sodium, dietary fiber, and Healthy Eating Index-2010 Seafood and Plant Proteins component score., Statistical Analyses Performed: Participants were grouped as reporting fewer (<3) or more (≥3) circumstances of discrimination on the Krieger Scale. Multivariable regression models examined associations between discrimination group and nutrient intake. Variables with non-normal distributions were log transformed. Associations were adjusted for total energy intake. Primary outcomes underwent false discovery rate correction (FDR)., Results: Those reporting three or more circumstances of discrimination had higher reported energy intake (p=0.002) and higher reported intake of total fat, saturated fat, unsaturated fats, protein, added sugar and sodium after FDR (all p<0.05) as compared to those reporting fewer circumstances. After adjustment for total energy intake, reporting three or more circumstances was associated with greater reported intake of saturated fat and n-3 polyunsaturated FA, and lower reported intake of dietary fiber (all p<0.05)., Conclusion: Reporting three or more circumstances of discrimination was associated with higher reported total energy intake. After adjustment for total energy, reporting three or more circumstances of perceived discrimination was associated with less nutritious intake for some (higher saturated fat and lower dietary fiber) but not all (higher eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids) nutrients., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Perinatal depression has been suggested to adversely impact child neurodevelopment. However, the complexity of the early childhood environment challenges conclusive findings., Objective: To evaluate whether there is an association between perinatal depressive symptoms and child intelligence quotient (IQ) at 5 years of age., Study Design: Secondary analysis of an ancillary study to a multicenter randomized trial of thyroxine therapy for pregnant individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism. Dyads of infants and birthing parent, with completed Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) screens during pregnancy and postpartum and child neurodevelopment testing completed at five years of age (n=209) were included. CES-D screening was performed at 11-20 weeks, 34-38 weeks, and one-year postpartum. Depressive symptoms were categorized as antenatal (i.e., a positive screen at any point during pregnancy) or postpartum. The primary outcome was child IQ score < 85 at 5 years of age using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence III (WPPSI-III) Full Scale test. Secondary outcomes included other assessments of childhood neurodevelopment. Bivariable analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were utilized., Results: Of the 209 birthing people included, 72 (34%) screened positive for depression during pregnancy and 32 (15%) screened positive one year postpartum. Children born to individuals with a positive antenatal depression screen had a higher odds of IQ < 85 at 5 years of age compared with children born to individuals with a CES-D < 16 (35% vs. 18%, OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.7). Similar findings were seen for children born to individuals with a positive postpartum depression screen (47% vs. 21%, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.5-7.3). These associations did not persist in multivariable analyses that controlled for social determinants of health and clinical characteristics (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-3.1; aOR 2.1, 95% CI 0.9-5.1, for antenatal and postpartum depressive symptoms, respectively). Similar findings were observed for other adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes., Conclusions: Having a positive perinatal depression screen was not associated with child cognitive outcomes after controlling for covariates including social determinants of health., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Suboptimal prenatal care is linked to increased risk of stillbirth, but this association is not well-understood. The study objective was to evaluate the relationship between prenatal visit adherence and cause of death in stillbirths., Study Design: This is a secondary analysis from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network of data with complete cause of death evaluation. Appropriateness of prenatal visit frequency was determined per American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/American Academy of Pediatrics (ACOG/AAP) recommendations and the novel Michigan Plan for Appropriately Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy (MiPATH) guidelines. Multivariate regression controlled for differences between groups., Results: Among 451 stillbirths included, 63.6% and 55.9% were non-adherent to ACOG/AAP and MiPATH recommendations, respectively. Non-adherent parturients according to the Michigan plan were more likely to have a stillbirth due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy., Conclusion: Non-adherence to prenatal visit guidelines is associated with higher risk of stillbirth due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective:  This study aimed to evaluate the safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor agents among patients with circulatory shock., Study Design:  We reviewed the published literature evaluating the use of peripheral norepinephrine in patients with shock and proposed a protocol for use in labor and delivery units., Results:  Peripheral administration of norepinephrine is a safe and potentially lifesaving intervention for patients in labor and delivery with extremely low complication rates., Conclusion:  Adoption of a protocol for peripheral administration of vasopressors in labor and delivery is safe and may prevent life threatening delays in hemodynamic resuscitation., Key Points: · Administering vasopressors through a peripheral line is safe and helps avoid delays in care.. · An established protocol is essential for the safe peripheral administration of vasopressors.. · Understanding continuous blood pressure monitoring is crucial for managing critically ill patients.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We examined the association between iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) during delivery and up to 1-year postpartum., Methods: In a retrospective cohort study across 3 states, we computed adjusted relative risks (aRR) for SMM comparing individuals with IDA versus those without, using modified Poisson regression models., Results: Among 2459,106 individuals, 10.3 % (n = 252,240) had IDA. Individuals with IDA experienced higher rates of blood transfusion and non-transfusion SMM (329 and 122 per 10,000 deliveries, respectively) than those without IDA (33 and 46 per 10,000 deliveries, respectively). The risk of blood transfusion (aRR: 8.2; 95 % CI 7.9-8.5) and non-transfusion SMM (aRR: 1.9; 95 % CI: 1.8-2.0) were higher among individuals with IDA. The attributable risk per 10,000 deliveries due to IDA for blood transfusion and non-transfusion SMM during delivery were 29.5 (95 % CI: 28.9-30.0) and 5.7 (95 % CI: 5.3-6.2), respectively. Within 1-year postpartum, the relative risk of non-transfusion SMM (aRR:1.3; 95 % CI: 1.2-1.3) was 30 % higher among individuals with IDA., Conclusion: IDA is associated with increased SMM risk. Addressing IDA in pregnant individuals may reduce SMM rates., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Nansi Boghossian reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Samuel Nyarko reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Lucy Greenberg reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Molly Passarella reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Scott Lorch reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Ciaran Phibbs reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. George Saade reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Jeff Buzas reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. None If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with pregnancies complicated by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of HCV infection in pregnancy. Participants were screened for HCV infection with serum antibody tests, and each participant with a positive HCV result (case group) was matched with up to two individuals with negative HCV results (control group) prospectively by gestational age (±2 weeks) at enrollment. Maternal outcomes included gestational diabetes, abruption, preeclampsia or gestational hypertension, cholestasis, and preterm delivery. Neonatal outcomes included hyperbilirubinemia, admission to neonatal intensive care (NICU); small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight; and neonatal infection , defined as sepsis or pneumonia. Models were adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, injection drug use, and maternal medical comorbidities., Results: The 249 individuals in the case group were prospectively matched to 486 individuals in the control group who met eligibility criteria. There were significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups, including race, socioeconomic markers, education, insurance status, and drug and tobacco use. The frequencies of maternal outcomes of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and abruption were similar between the case and control groups. Preterm birth was similar between groups, but neonates born to individuals in the case group were more likely to be admitted to the NICU (45.1% vs 19.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.6, 95% CI, 1.8-3.8) and to have SGA birth weights below the 5th percentile (10.6% vs 3.1%, aOR 2.9, 95% CI, 1.4-6.0). There were no increased odds of hyperbilirubinemia or neonatal infection., Conclusion: Despite no increased odds of preterm birth or other adverse maternal outcomes in adjusted analyses, maternal HCV infection was associated with twofold increased odds of NICU admission and nearly threefold increased odds of SGA birth weight below the 5th percentile., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Brenna Hughes reports an ongoing financial relationship with UpToDate. Rebecca Clifton reports funding from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences for DSMB meetings and from the NIH to her institution. Anna Bartholomew reports money paid to her institution by NICHD and George Washington University. Alan Tita reports money paid to his institution from Pfizer. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Money was paid to her institution from Pfizer (site PI for phase III respiratory syncytial virus [RSV] vaccine trial and site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy). Geeta Swamy reports receiving past funding from GlaxoSmithKline and ongoing funding from Pfizer, Medscape, UpToDate, Moderna, and Sanofi. The other authors did not disclose any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Following the results of the A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management trial, which demonstrated a reduction in cesarean delivery with no increase in adverse perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor in low-risk nulliparous patients at 39 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management, the use of induction of labor has increased. Current evidence is insufficient to recommend mid- to high-dose regimens over low-dose regimens for routine induction of labor., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between oxytocin regimen and cesarean delivery and an adverse perinatal composite outcome in low-risk nulliparous patients undergoing induction of labor at ≥39 weeks of gestation., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network's A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management randomized trial. Patients who received a mid- to high-dose oxytocin regimen (starting or incremental increase >2 mU/min) were compared with those who received a low-dose oxytocin regimen (starting and incremental increase ≤2 mU/min). The co-primary outcomes for this secondary analysis were (1) cesarean delivery and (2) composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks and 97.5% confidence intervals for the co-primary endpoints and 95% confidence intervals for binomial outcomes, and multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% adjusted relative risks for multinomial outcomes., Results: Of 6106 participants enrolled in the primary trial, 2933 underwent induction of labor with oxytocin: 861 in the mid- to high-dose group and 2072 in the low-dose group. The lower frequency of cesarean delivery in the mid- to high-dose group than in the low-dose group (20.3% vs 25.2%, respectively; relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.94) was not significant after adjustment (adjusted relative risk, 0.90; 97.5% confidence interval, 0.76-1.07). The composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications was more frequent in the mid- to high-dose group than in the low-dose group (6.7% vs 4.3%, respectively; relative risk, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.14) and remained significant after adjustment (adjusted relative risk, 1.61; 97.5% confidence interval, 1.11-2.35). Most cases in the composite were from the respiratory support (5.2% in the mid- to high-dose group vs 3.1% in the low-dose group) component, with an increase in transient tachypnea in newborns (3.8% in the mid- to high-dose group vs 2.5% in the low-dose group; adjusted relative risk, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.54). The duration of neonatal respiratory support for 1 day was significantly longer in the mid- to high-dose group than in the low-dose group (3.5% vs 1.4%, respectively; adjusted relative risk, 2.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-4.39). However, support beyond 1 day was not different between the 2 groups. Compared with the low-dose group, the mid- to high-dose group had a higher operative vaginal delivery rate (10.0% vs 7.0%, respectively; adjusted relative risk, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.00) and shorter duration of time from start of oxytocin to delivery (crude median: 12 hours [interquartile range, 8-17] vs 13 hours [interquartile range 9-19], respectively; adjusted median difference: -2 [95% CI, -2 to -1]; P<.001)., Conclusion: The use of mid-to high-dose oxytocin regimens for induction of labor in nulliparas at ≥39 weeks of gestation was not associated with a lower cesarean delivery rate or improved neonatal outcomes compared with the use of low-dose oxytocin regimens. Although the use of mid- to high-dose oxytocin regimens was associated with a shorter duration of labor, there was an increase in self-limited neonatal respiratory support and no difference in cesarean delivery rates. More evidences are needed to define the magnitude of potential maternal and neonatal benefits and risks associated with oxytocin regimens., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Study demonstrated that a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg during pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Outside of pregnancy, pharmacologic therapy for patients with diabetes and hypertension is adjusted to a target blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg. During pregnancy, patients with both diabetes and chronic hypertension may also benefit from tighter control with a target blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg., Objective: We compared perinatal outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who achieved blood pressure <130/80 vs 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of a multcenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were included in this secondary analysis if they had diabetes diagnosed prior to pregnancy or at <20 weeks of gestation and at least 2 recorded blood pressure measurements prior to delivery. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated using ambulatory antenatal blood pressures. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome, cesarean delivery, fetal or neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and small for gestational age. Comparisons were made between those with an average systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg and average diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg and those with an average systolic blood pressure 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg using Student's t test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate risk ratios between blood pressure groups for dichotomous outcomes while accounting for baseline covariates., Results: Of 434 participants included, 150 (34.6%) had an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 were more likely to be on antihypertensive medications at the start of pregnancy and more likely to have newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus prior to 20 weeks. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg were less likely to have the primary adverse perinatal outcome (19.3% vs 46.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.61, P<.01), with decreased risks specifically of preeclampsia with severe features (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.54) and indicated preterm birth prior to 35 weeks (adjusted relative risk 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.79). The risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.94). No differences were noted in cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.20), fetal or neonatal death (adjusted relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.12-2.92). Small for gestational age less than the 10th percentile was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.96)., Conclusion: In those with chronic hypertension and diabetes prior to 20 weeks, achieving an average goal blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To examine the incidence of overt hypothyroidism 1 and 5 years after pregnancies where screening before 21 weeks identified subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) or hypothyroxinemia (HT). Methods: Secondary analysis of two multicenter treatment trials for either SH or HT diagnosed between 8 and 20 weeks gestation. Current analyses focus only on individuals randomized to the placebo groups in the two parallel studies. SH was diagnosed with thyrotropin (TSH) ≥4.0 mU/L and normal free T4 (fT4) (0.86-1.9 ng/dL). HT was diagnosed with normal TSH (0.08-3.99 mU/L) but fT4 <0.86 ng/dL. Serum from initial testing was stored for later thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibody assay; results were not returned for clinical management. At 1 and 5 years after delivery, participants were asked whether they had either been diagnosed with or were being treated for a thyroid condition. Maternal serum was collected at these visits and thyroid function measured. Subsequent overt hypothyroidism was defined as TSH ≥4.0 mU/L with fT4 <0.86 ng/dL. Results: Data for 1- and 5-year follow-up were available in 307 of the 338 participants with SH and 229 of the 261 with HT. Subsequent hypothyroidism was more common both at year 1 (13.4% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001) and year 5 (15.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001) for participants with SH compared with those with HT. This progression was more common in individuals with TSH values >10 mIU/mL. Baseline TPO level >50 IU/mL in participants with SH was associated with higher rates of hypothyroidism at year 1 (26.7% vs. 6.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 5.3 [confidence interval (CI) 2.6-10.7]) and year 5 (30.5% vs. 7.5%, OR = 5.4 [CI: 2.8-10.6]) compared with those with TPO levels ≤50 IU/mL. For participants with HT, no differences in overt hypothyroidism were seen at 1 year related to baseline TPO level >50 IU/mL (1/10 (10%) vs. 6/218 (2.8%), OR = 3.9 [CI: 0.43-36.1]), but more participants with TPO levels >50 IU/mL developed hypothyroidism by year 5 (2/10 (20%) vs. 4/218 (1.8%), OR = 13.4 [CI: 2.1-84.1]). Conclusion: SH is associated with higher rates of overt hypothyroidism or thyroid replacement therapy within 5 years of delivery than is HT when these conditions are diagnosed in the first half of pregnancy.

Importance: There is no consensus regarding the best method for prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including gestational hypertension and preeclampsia., Objective: To determine predictive ability in early pregnancy of large-scale proteomics for prediction of HDP., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a nested case-control study, conducted in 2022 to 2023, using clinical data and plasma samples collected between 2010 and 2013 during the first trimester, with follow-up until pregnancy outcome. This multicenter observational study took place at 8 academic medical centers in the US. Nulliparous individuals during first-trimester clinical visits were included. Participants with HDP were selected as cases; controls were selected from those who delivered at or after 37 weeks without any HDP, preterm birth, or small-for-gestational-age infant. Age, self-reported race and ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, health insurance, and fetal sex were available covariates., Exposures: Proteomics using an aptamer-based assay that included 6481 unique human proteins was performed on stored plasma. Covariates were used in predictive models., Main Outcomes and Measures: Prediction models were developed using the elastic net, and analyses were performed on a randomly partitioned training dataset comprising 80% of study participants, with the remaining 20% used as an independent testing dataset. Primary measure of predictive performance was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)., Results: This study included 753 HDP cases and 1097 controls with a mean (SD) age of 26.9 (5.5) years. Maternal race and ethnicity were 51 Asian (2.8%), 275 non-Hispanic Black (14.9%), 275 Hispanic (14.9%), 1161 non-Hispanic White (62.8% ), and 88 recorded as other (4.8%), which included those who did not identify according to these designations. The elastic net model, allowing for forced inclusion of prespecified covariates, was used to adjust protein-based models for clinical and demographic variables. Under this approach, no proteins were selected to augment the clinical and demographic covariates. The predictive performance of the resulting model was modest, with a training set AUC of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.61-0.67) and a test set AUC of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.68). Further adjustment for study site yielded only minimal changes in AUCs., Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study with detailed clinical data and stored plasma samples available in the first trimester, an aptamer-based proteomics panel did not meaningfully add to predictive utility over and above clinical and demographic factors that are routinely available.

Objective: To investigate the optimal gestational age to deliver pregnant people with chronic hypertension to improve perinatal outcomes., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of chronic hypertension treatment to different blood pressure goals. Participants with term, singleton gestations were included. Those with fetal anomalies and those with a diagnosis of preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation were excluded. The primary maternal composite outcome included death, serious morbidity (heart failure, stroke, encephalopathy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, intensive care unit admission, intubation, renal failure), preeclampsia with severe features, hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, or abruption. The primary neonatal outcome included fetal or neonatal death, respiratory support beyond oxygen mask, Apgar score less than 3 at 5 minutes, neonatal seizures, or suspected sepsis. Secondary outcomes included intrapartum cesarean birth, length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn, and hypoglycemia. Those with a planned delivery were compared with those expectantly managed at each gestational week. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs are reported., Results: We included 1,417 participants with mild chronic hypertension; 305 (21.5%) with a new diagnosis in pregnancy and 1,112 (78.5%) with known preexisting hypertension. Groups differed by body mass index (BMI) and preexisting diabetes. In adjusted models, there was no association between planned delivery and the primary maternal or neonatal composite outcome in any gestational age week compared with expectant management. Planned delivery at 37 weeks of gestation was associated with RDS (7.9% vs 3.0%, aOR 2.70, 95% CI, 1.40-5.22), and planned delivery at 37 and 38 weeks was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia (19.4% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.27-3.08 in week 37; 14.4% vs 7.7%, aOR 1.82, 95% CI, 1.06-3.10 in week 38)., Conclusion: Planned delivery in the early-term period compared with expectant management was not associated with a reduction in adverse maternal outcomes. However, it was associated with increased odds of some neonatal complications. Delivery timing for individuals with mild chronic hypertension should weigh maternal and neonatal outcomes in each gestational week but may be optimized by delivery at 39 weeks., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure: Torri D. Metz reports personal fees from Pfizer for her role as a medical consultant for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, and grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for RSV vaccination in pregnancy study outside the submitted work. Sherri Longo reports that UAB received NIH funding for the CHAP trial and Ochsner was one of the sites participating in the trial. Ochsner received a subaward from UAB for participation in the trial. Ochsner is a subsite to UAB, who is in the MFMU network; therefore, they have participated in trials. They have participated in other studies with UAB, including the CSOAP trial. They have collaborated on studies with Tulane and have subawards. Kelly Gibson reports money was paid to her institution from NHLBI, NICHD, and Materna Medical. Lauren Plante reports receiving payment from Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis for textbook royalties. She also received an honorarium speaking fee from Monmouth Medical Center. Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie and Nemo Health. Heather Frey and Wendy Kinzler received payment from UpToDate. Todd Rosen's institution received payment from Materna, Inc. and Myriad, Inc. Mary Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski received payment from Organon and Cooper Surgical. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment for a Johnson & Johnson clinical trial. He received payment from Prehevbrio for serving on the data safety monitoring board for hepatitis vaccine in pregnancy. Namasivayam Ambalavanan received payment from Oak Hill Bio and for serving on the advisory board and holding intellectual property with AlveolusBio and Resbiotic. Alan T. N. Tita's institution received payment from Pfizer. Everett Magann received payment from UpToDate for co-authorship of the Ultrasound Assessment of Amniotic Fluid Volume chapter. Lorraine Dugoff reports that money was paid to her institution from Myriad and Natera. Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving funding from UpToDate and Moderna. Eugene Chang reports money was paid to his institution from Roche Diagnostics and Roche. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (PASC) after infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and to characterize associated risk factors., Methods: In a multicenter cohort study (NIH RECOVER [Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery]-Pregnancy Cohort), individuals who were pregnant during their first SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled across the United States from December 2021 to September 2023, either within 30 days of their infection or at differential time points thereafter. The primary outcome was PASC , defined as score of 12 or higher based on symptoms and severity as previously published by the NIH RECOVER-Adult Cohort, at the first study visit at least 6 months after the participant's first SARS-CoV-2 infection. Risk factors for PASC were evaluated, including sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics before SARS-CoV-2 infection (baseline comorbidities, trimester of infection, vaccination status), and acute infection severity (classified by need for oxygen therapy). Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to estimate associations between these characteristics and presence of PASC., Results: Of the 1,502 participants, 61.1% had their first SARS-CoV-2 infection on or after December 1, 2021 (ie, during Omicron variant dominance); 51.4% were fully vaccinated before infection; and 182 (12.1%) were enrolled within 30 days of their acute infection. The prevalence of PASC was 9.3% (95% CI, 7.9-10.9%) measured at a median of 10.3 months (interquartile range 6.1-21.5) after first infection. The most common symptoms among individuals with PASC were postexertional malaise (77.7%), fatigue (76.3%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (61.2%). In a multivariable model, the proportion PASC positive with vs without history of obesity (14.9% vs 7.5%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.65, 95% CI, 1.12-2.43), depression or anxiety disorder (14.4% vs 6.1%, aOR 2.64, 95% CI, 1.79-3.88) before first infection, economic hardship (self-reported difficulty covering expenses) (12.5% vs 6.9%, aOR 1.57, 95% CI, 1.05-2.34), and treatment with oxygen during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (18.1% vs 8.7%, aOR 1.86, 95% CI, 1.00-3.44) were associated with increased prevalence of PASC., Conclusion: The prevalence of PASC at a median time of 10.3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was 9.3% in the NIH RECOVER-Pregnancy Cohort. The predominant symptoms were postexertional malaise, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Several socioeconomic and clinical characteristics were associated with PASC after infection during pregnancy., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05172024., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Torri D. Metz is the site PI for a Pfizer study of Paxlovid in pregnancy and was the site PI for a Pfizer study of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. She has received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Carmen J. Beamon disclosed receiving payments from Wellcare of North Carolina. Ann Chang's institution received payment from New York University for her efforts on this study. Kelly S. Gibson disclosed that her institution received funding from the NICHD, NHLBI, and Materna. Rachel Hess received payment from Astellas Pharmaceuticals. M. Camile Hoffman disclosed her institution received payment for her expert testimony for one medicolegal trial from Wheeler, Trigg, and Associates (a defense attorneys firm). Her institution also received payment for a disease state presentation on postpartum depression and zuranolone from SAGE/Biogen. Brenna L. Hughes disclosed receiving payments from UpToDate and Moderna. Stuart Katz disclosed payments for providing expert testimony for Venable LLP. Jennifer Hadlock has received funding (paid to institution) for retrospective studies of COVID-19 from Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, and Gilead. Grace A. McComsey served as an advisor for Gilead and ViiVGlaxoSmithKline. Patrick Ramsey disclosed receiving royalties from UpToDate. His institution was paid by the Texas Collaborative for Healthy Mothers and Babies (TCHMB)—Texas PQC for part of his efforts. Daniel W. Skupski reports receiving payments from Organon, Inc and Cooper Surgical. Alan T.N. Tita disclosed money paid to his institution from Pfizer for his efforts in this study. Andrea Foulkes disclosed receiving past payments from Round Table, Inc. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective:  This study aimed to develop a prediction model that estimates the probability that a pregnant person who has had asymptomatic or mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prior to delivery admission will progress in severity to moderate, severe, or critical COVID-19., Study Design:  This was a secondary analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive patients who delivered from March through December 2020 at hospitals across the United States. Those eligible for this analysis presented for delivery with a current or previous asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was moderate, severe, or critical COVID-19 during the delivery admission through 42 days postpartum. The prediction model was developed and internally validated using stratified cross-validation with stepwise backward elimination, incorporating only variables that were known on the day of hospital admission., Results:  Of the 2,818 patients included, 26 (0.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.3%) developed moderate-severe-critical COVID-19 during the study period. Variables in the prediction model were gestational age at delivery admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08-1.22 per 1-week decrease), a hypertensive disorder in a prior pregnancy (aOR 3.05; 95% CI, 1.25-7.46), and systolic blood pressure at admission (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05 per mm Hg increase). This model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.91)., Conclusion:  Among individuals presenting for delivery who had asymptomatic-mild COVID-19, gestational age at delivery admission, a hypertensive disorder in a prior pregnancy, and systolic blood pressure at admission were predictive of delivering with moderate, severe, or critical COVID-19. This prediction model may be a useful tool to optimize resources for SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant individuals admitted for delivery., Key Points: · Three factors were associated with delivery with more severe COVID-19.. · The developed model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 and model fit was good.. · The model may be useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnancies admitted for delivery.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery., Study Design: A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age., Results: The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata ( p  = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata., Conclusion: Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.

Objective: To test whether an individualized opioid-prescription protocol (IOPP) with a shared decision-making component can be used without compromising postcesarean pain management., Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial, we compared IOPP with shared decision making with a fixed quantity of opioid tablets at hospital discharge. We recruited at 31 centers participating in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Study participants had uncomplicated cesarean births. Follow-up occurred through 12 weeks postdischarge. Individuals with complicated cesarean births or history of opioid use in the pregnancy were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to IOPP with shared decision making or fixed quantity (20 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone). In the IOPP group, we calculated recommended tablet quantity based on opioid use in the 24 hours before discharge. After an educational module and shared decision making, participants selected a quantity of discharge tablets (up to 20). The primary outcome was moderate to severe pain (score 4 or higher [possible range 0-10]) on the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) at 1 week after discharge. A total sample size of 5,500 participants was planned to assess whether IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to the fixed quantity of 20 tablets., Results: From September 2020 to March 2022, 18,990 individuals were screened and 5,521 were enrolled (n=2,748 IOPP group, n=2,773 fixed-quantity group). For the primary outcome, IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to fixed quantity (59.5% vs 60.1%, risk difference 0.67%; 95% CI, -2.03% to 3.37%, noninferiority margin -5.0) and resulted in significantly fewer tablets received (median 14 [interquartile range 4-20] vs 20, P <.001) through 90 days postpartum., Conclusion: Compared with fixed quantity, IOPP with shared decision making was noninferior for outpatient postcesarean analgesia at 1 week postdischarge and resulted in fewer prescribed opioid tablets at discharge., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04296396., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Unrelated to this work, Marcela C. Smid reports that she serves as a consultant for Gilead Science Inc and Alydia/Organon. Her institution receives research funding from both organizations. Rebecca Clifton reports payment from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences for DSMB reviews. Sindhu Srinivas reports receiving payments from Goodall, Decries, Leech & Dawn, LLP, and Huff Powell Bailey. Ruth Landau reports receiving payments from PACIRA Biosciences and Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Cora MacPherson reports receiving payments from PCORI and Natera. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous studies examining racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) have mainly focused on intrapartum hospitalization. There is limited information regarding the racial and ethnic distribution of SMM occurring in the antepartum and postpartum periods, including SMM occurring beyond the traditional 6 weeks postpartum period., Objective: To examine the racial and ethnic distribution of SMM during antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum hospitalizations through 1-year postpartum, overall and stratified by maternal sociodemographic factors, and to estimate the percent increase in SMM by race and ethnicity and maternal sociodemographic factors within each racial and ethnic group after accounting for both antepartum and postpartum SMM through 1-year postpartum rather than just SMM occurring during the intrapartum hospitalization., Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificate data linked to hospital discharge records from Michigan, Oregon, and South Carolina from 2008-2020. We examined the distribution of non-transfusion SMM and total SMM per 10,000 cases during antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum hospitalizations through 365 days postpartum by race and ethnicity and by maternal education and insurance type within each racial and ethnic group. We subsequently examined "SMM cases added" by race and ethnicity and by maternal education and insurance type within each racial and ethnic group. The "SMM cases added" represent cases among unique individuals that are identified by considering the antepartum and postpartum periods but that would be missed if only the intrapartum hospitalization cases were included., Results: Among 2,584,206 birthing individuals, a total of 37,112 (1.4%) individuals experienced non-transfusion SMM and 64,661 (2.5%) experienced any SMM during antepartum, intrapartum, and/or postpartum hospitalization. Black individuals had the highest rate of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum non-transfusion and total SMM followed by American Indian individuals. Asian individuals had the lowest rate of non-transfusion and total SMM during antepartum and postpartum hospitalizations while White individuals had the lowest rate of non-transfusion and total SMM during the intrapartum hospitalization. Black individuals were 1.9 times more likely to experience non-transfusion SMM during the intrapartum hospitalization than White individuals, which increased to 2.8 times during the antepartum period and to 2.5 times during the postpartum period. Asian and Hispanic individuals were less likely to experience SMM in the postpartum period than White individuals. Including antepartum and postpartum hospitalizations resulted in disproportionately more cases among Black and American Indian individuals than among White, Hispanic, and Asian individuals. The additional cases were also more likely to occur among individuals with lower educational levels and individuals on government insurance., Conclusion: Racial disparities in SMM are underreported in estimates that focus on the intrapartum hospitalization. Additionally, individuals with low socio-economic status bear the greatest burden of SMM occurring during the antepartum and postpartum periods. Approaches that focus on mitigating SMM during the intrapartum period only do not address the full spectrum of health disparities. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent data in nonpregnant individuals suggest a protective effect of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity., Objectives: Our primary objective was to evaluate whether influenza vaccination was associated with COVID-19 severity and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among those infected with SARS-CoV-2. The secondary objective was to examine the association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection., Study Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of pregnant people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020, and a cohort of random deliveries during the same time period. The associations between 2019 influenza vaccination and the primary outcome of moderate-to-critical COVID-19 as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes were examined among all people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020. The association between 2019 influenza vaccination and having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was examined among a cohort of individuals who delivered on randomly selected dates between March and August 2020. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed., Results: Of 2325 people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1068 (45.9%) were vaccinated against influenza in 2019. Those who received the influenza vaccine were older, leaner, more likely to have private insurance, and identify as White or Hispanic. They were less likely to smoke tobacco and identify as Black. Overall, 419 (18.0%) had moderate, 193 (8.3%) severe, and 52 (2.2%) critical COVID-19. There was no association between influenza vaccination and moderate-to-critical COVID-19 (29.2% vs. 28.0%, adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.34) or adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes among those who tested positive. Of 8152 people who delivered in 2020, 4658 (57.1%) received the influenza vaccine. Prior vaccination was not associated with a difference in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.8% vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19)., Conclusion: Prior influenza vaccination was not associated with decreased severity of COVID-19 or lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To estimate the association between mean arterial pressure during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in participants with chronic hypertension using data from the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy) trial., Methods: A secondary analysis of the CHAP trial, an open-label, multicenter randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy, was conducted. The CHAP trial enrolled participants with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 140-159/90-104 mm Hg) and singleton pregnancies less than 23 weeks of gestation, randomizing them to active treatment (maintained on antihypertensive therapy with a goal BP below 140/90 mm Hg) or standard treatment (control; antihypertensives withheld unless BP reached 160 mm Hg systolic BP or higher or 105 mm Hg diastolic BP or higher). We used logistic regression to measure the strength of association between mean arterial pressure (average and highest across study visits) and to select neonatal outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (per 1-unit increase in millimeters of mercury) of the primary neonatal composite outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4) and individual secondary outcomes (neonatal intensive care unit admission [NICU], low birth weight [LBW] below 2,500 g, and small for gestational age [SGA]) were calculated., Results: A total of 2,284 participants were included: 1,155 active and 1,129 control. Adjusted models controlling for randomization group demonstrated that increasing average mean arterial pressure per millimeter of mercury was associated with an increase in each neonatal outcome examined except NEC, specifically neonatal composite (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), NICU admission (aOR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.06-1.08), LBW (aOR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.11-1.14), SGA below the fifth percentile (aOR 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and SGA below the 10th percentile (aOR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.04). Models using the highest mean arterial pressure as opposed to average mean arterial pressure also demonstrated consistent associations., Conclusion: Increasing mean arterial pressure was positively associated with most adverse neonatal outcomes except NEC. Given that the relationship between mean arterial pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes may not be consistent at all mean arterial pressure levels, future work should attempt to further elucidate whether there is an absolute threshold or relative change in mean arterial pressure at which fetal benefits are optimized along with maternal benefits., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Rodney K. Edwards' institution received grants from the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology for a pilot study related to postcesarean opioids, and from the NIH through Oklahoma CTR for a pilot trial on warming preterm infants during delayed cord clamping, a Presbyterian Health Foundation Team Science grant for a pilot trial evaluating effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on maternal triglycerides and fetal growth, an NIH grant to evaluate changes in atherogenic apolipoproteins with immediate prepregnancy intervention and whether they were maintained during pregnancy, a grant from Cepheid for clinical evaluation of the Xpert Xpress GBS test using vaginal/rectal dual swabs collected intrapartum, and an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT evaluating intensive glycemic targets in overweight and obese women with GDM. He has a pending NIH grant for a multicenter RCT evaluating prophylactic antibiotics for inductions of labor in nulliparous women with obesity at term. Dr. Edwards served as an expert witness in a case regarding a malpractice claim. Kelly S. Gibson's institution received funding for the Materna Medical research study (EASE). She received payment from the NIH for serving on the RADX grant review committee. She has been a speaker at an ACOG-AIM webinar and received a Ohio State AIM grant for hypertension treatment. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial, a COVID-19 vaccine trial in pregnancy, and pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (institution received money to conduct studies). Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie. Anna Palatnik received payment from the American Heart Association career development award and from NHLBI HL165013 to evaluate intensive postpartum antihypertensive treatment following gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Mary E. Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment from Johnson & Johnson/Janssen pharmaceuticals to support a clinical trial in alloimmunized patients. Everett F. Magann received a royalty as an author of the UpToDate chapter on ultrasound estimate of amniotic fluid volume. Eugene Chang's institution received payment from Roche Diagnostics. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received payment from Pfizer. Sherri Longo acknowledges the financial support received for the Prospect study and other NIH-funded studies including CHAP maternal follow-up and CSOAP follow-up. She is also an investigator for the Moms on the Bayou research project with Tulane University and is receiving funding from the NIH Maternal Health Research Center of Excellence awarded to a collaborative effort between Tulane University, Ochsner Health, and RHI. Todd Rosen acknowledges the financial support received as a co-investigator from Materna Medical Inc to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Materna Prep Device; NEIHS/HIN for the Ambient Air Pollution, Weather, and Placental Abruption (APWA) study; NIH/NICHD for The Genomic Architecture of Pregnancy Loss study and Multicenter Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Research Network—MFMU Clinical Center (TAC); NIH/NHLBI for Pregnancy as a Window to the Future study (a CHAP maternal follow-up study) and for Cardiovascular Health After Placental Abruption study; and as a principal investigator for Sulfasalazine to Prevent Preterm Birth, funded by the Hudson Shea Foundation and The Perinatal Research Consortium. Daniel Skupski's institution received payment from Pfizer, as he served as a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial (institution received money to conduct study). His institution also received payment for her to serve as a site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy. Dr. Skupski is also a paid consultant for the Organon company in relation to a medical device (Fetal Pillow) used to manage cesarean deliveries performed during the second stage of labor. Rachel Sinkey received funding paid to her institution from the NIH and the American Heart Association. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by type of antihypertensive used in participants of the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy) trial., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP, an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment compared with standard care (no treatment unless severe hypertension developed) in pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-104 mm Hg before 20 weeks of gestation) and singleton pregnancies. We performed three comparisons based on medications prescribed at enrollment: labetalol compared with standard care, nifedipine compared with standard care, and labetalol compared with nifedipine. Although active compared with standard care groups were randomized, medication assignment within the active treatment group was not random but based on clinician or patient preference. The primary outcome was the occurrence of superimposed preeclampsia with severe features, preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The key secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We also compared medication adverse effects between groups. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with log binomial regression to adjust for confounding., Results: Of 2,292 participants analyzed, 720 (31.4%) received labetalol, 417 (18.2%) received nifedipine, and 1,155 (50.4%) received no treatment. The mean gestational age at enrollment was 10.5±3.7 weeks; nearly half of participants (47.5%) identified as non-Hispanic Black; and 44.5% used aspirin. The primary outcome occurred in 217 (30.1%), 130 (31.2%), and 427 (37.0%) in the labetalol, nifedipine, and standard care groups, respectively. Risk of the primary outcome was lower among those receiving treatment (labetalol use vs standard adjusted RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; nifedipine use vs standard adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), but there was no significant difference in risk when labetalol was compared with nifedipine (adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.82-1.18). There were no significant differences in SGA or serious adverse events between participants receiving labetalol and those receiving nifedipine., Conclusion: No significant differences in predetermined maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected on the basis of the use of labetalol or nifedipine for treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02299414., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving payment from UpToDate. Rodney K. Edwards' institution received payment from the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology and the Presbyterian Health Foundation. He received payment from the NIH through Oklahoma CTR grant for a pilot trial on warming preterm infants during delayed cord clamping. He received a Presbyterian Health Foundation grant for a pilot trial on omega-3 fatty acid supplementation effects on maternal triglycerides and fetal growth. He received an NIH grant for evaluation of atherogenic lipoproteins changes with immediate prepregnancy intervention and whether they were maintained during pregnancy. He received a grant from Cepheid for the clinical evaluation of the Xpert Xpress GBS test using vaginal/rectal swabs collected intrapartum. He was awarded an Oklahoma State DOH contract for support for patient-centered, comprehensive pregnancy care for women with substance use disorders. He received an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of intensive glycemic targets in women with overweight and obesity with GDM. Lastly, he has a pending NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of prophylactic antibiotics for induction of labor in women with obesity. He has served on an expert witness case regarding a medical malpractice claim. Kelly S. Gibson's institution received an NHCID-MFMU network grant and Materna Medical research support (EASE). She received payment from NIH as a RADx grant reviewer and was an Ohio AIM grant recipient as an AIM webinar speaker. Rachel Sinkey received funding paid to her institution from the NIH and the American Heart Association. Kelly S. Gibson reports her institution received an NHCID-MFMU network grant and Materna Medical research support (EASE). She received payment as a NIH-RADx grant reviewer. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial (institution received money to conduct study). Her institution also received payment for her to serve as a site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy. She has received payment from Pfizer as a site PI for a pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie. Mary E. Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski received payment from Organon and Cooper Surgical. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment from Johnson & Johnson/Janssen Pharmaceuticals for an FDA trial on alloimmunization management. Everett F. Magann is a co-author on and UpToDate chapter on amniotic fluid volume assessment. Heather Frey also received royalties for contributions to UpToDate on the topic of uterine rupture. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received funding from Pfizer. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial, a COVID-19 vaccine trial in pregnancy, and pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (institution received money to conduct studies). Kara K. Hoppe's institution received an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of remote blood pressure monitoring with health coaching versus standard of care, HHS funding for a hypertension challenge initiative, Marani to study implementation of their remote patient monitoring platform for hypertensive patients in pregnancy and postpartum. Additionally, she received payment for the NIH as a grant reviewer and WisPQC for providing physician leadership for the state quality initiative on hypertension in pregnancy. Eugene Chang received payment from Roche diagnostics for research on sflt-1/plgf. Sherri Longo acknowledges the financial support received for the Prospect study and other NIH-funded studies including CHAP maternal follow-up and CSOAP follow-up. She is also an investigator for the Moms on the Bayou research project with Tulane University and is receiving funding from the NIH Maternal Health Research Center of Excellence awarded to a collaborative effort between Tulane University, Ochsner Health, and RHI. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received funding from Pfizer. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few recent studies have examined the rate of severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal and/or postpartum period to 42 days after delivery. However, little is known about the rate of severe maternal morbidity occurring beyond 42 days after delivery., Objective: This study aimed to examine the distribution of severe maternal morbidity and its indicators during antenatal, delivery, and postpartum hospitalizations to 365 days after delivery and to estimate the increase in severe maternal morbidity rate and its indicators after accounting for antenatal and postpartum severe maternal morbidity to 365 days after delivery., Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificate data linked to hospital discharge records from Michigan, Oregon, and South Carolina from 2008 to 2020. This study examined the distribution of severe maternal morbidity, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity, and severe maternal morbidity indicators during antenatal, delivery, and postpartum hospitalizations to 365 days after delivery. Subsequently, this study examined "severe maternal morbidity cases added," which represent cases among unique individuals that are included by considering the antenatal and postpartum periods but that would be missed if only the delivery hospitalization cases were included., Results: A total of 64,661 (2.5%) individuals experienced severe maternal morbidity, whereas 37,112 (1.4%) individuals experienced nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during antenatal, delivery, and/or postpartum hospitalization. A total of 31% of severe maternal morbidity cases were added after accounting for severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal or postpartum hospitalization to 365 days after delivery, whereas 49% of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity cases were added after accounting for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal or postpartum periods. Severe maternal morbidity occurring between 43 and 365 days after delivery contributed to 12% of all severe maternal morbidity cases, whereas nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity occurring between 43 and 365 days after delivery contributed to 19% of all nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity cases., Conclusion: Our study showed that a total of 31% of severe maternal morbidity and 49% of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity cases were added after accounting for severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal or postpartum hospitalization to 365 days after delivery. Our findings highlight the importance of expanding the severe maternal morbidity definition beyond the delivery hospitalization to better capture the full period of increased risk, identify contributing factors, and design strategies to mitigate this risk. Only then can we improve outcomes for mothers and subsequently the quality of life of their infants., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Venous thromboembolism accounts for approximately 9% of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States. National guidelines recommend postpartum risk stratification and pharmacologic prophylaxis in at-risk individuals. Knowledge on modern rates of postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and its associated risks is limited., Objective: This study aimed to describe the rate of, and factors associated with, initiation of postpartum pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, and to assess associated adverse outcomes., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter cohort of individuals delivering on randomly selected days at 17 US hospitals (2019-2020). Medical records were reviewed by trained and certified personnel. Those with an antepartum diagnosis of venous thromboembolism, receiving antepartum anticoagulation, or known SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. The primary outcome was use of postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included bleeding complications, surgical site infection, hospital readmission, and venous thromboembolism through 6 weeks postpartum. The rate of thromboprophylaxis administration was assessed by mode of delivery, institution, and continuance to the outpatient setting. Multivariable regression models were developed using k-fold cross-validation with stepwise backward elimination to evaluate factors associated with thromboprophylaxis administration. Univariable and multivariable logistic models with propensity score covariate adjustment were performed to assess the association between thromboprophylaxis administration and adverse outcomes., Results: Of 21,114 individuals in the analytical cohort, 11.9% (95% confidence interval, 11.4%-12.3%) received postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis; the frequency of receipt was 29.8% (95% confidence interval, 28.7%-30.9%) following cesarean and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.2%-3.8%) following vaginal delivery. Institutional rates of prophylaxis varied from 0.21% to 34.8%. Most individuals (83.3%) received thromboprophylaxis only as inpatients. In adjusted analysis, cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 19.17; 95% confidence interval, 16.70-22.00), hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 15.70; 95% confidence interval, 4.35-56.65), and obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 3.02-3.95) were the strongest factors associated with thromboprophylaxis administration. Thromboprophylaxis administration was not associated with surgical site infection (0.9% vs 0.6%; odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-2.74), bleeding complications (0.2% vs 0.1%; odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-6.80), or postpartum readmission (0.9% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-2.81). The overall rate of venous thromboembolism was 0.06% (95% confidence interval, 0.03%-0.10%) and was higher in those receiving prophylaxis (0.2%) compared with those not receiving prophylaxis (0.04%)., Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 10 patients received postpartum pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this US cohort. Rates of prophylaxis varied widely by institution. Cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, and obesity were predominant factors associated with postpartum thromboprophylaxis administration., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: We sought to (1) use the Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS), which classifies deliveries into 10 mutually exclusive groups, to characterize the groups that are primary contributors to cesarean delivery frequencies, (2) describe inter-hospital variations in cesarean delivery frequencies, and (3) evaluate the contribution of patient characteristics by TGCS group to hospital variation in cesarean delivery frequencies., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of an observational cohort of 115,502 deliveries from 25 hospitals between 2008 and 2011. The TGCS was applied to the cohort and each hospital. We identified and compared the TGCS groups with the greatest relative contributions to cohort and hospital cesarean delivery frequencies. We assessed variation in hospital cesarean deliveries attributable to patient characteristics within TGCS groups using hierarchical logistic regression., Results: A total of 115,211 patients were classifiable in the TGCS (99.7%). The cohort cesarean delivery frequency was 31.4% (hospital range: 19.1-39.3%). Term singletons in vertex presentation with a prior cesarean delivery (group 5) were the greatest relative contributor to cohort (34.8%) and hospital cesarean delivery frequencies (median: 33.6%; range: 23.8-45.5%). Nulliparous term singletons in vertex (NTSV) presentation (groups 1 [spontaneous labor] and 2 [induced or absent labor]: 28.9%), term singletons in vertex presentation with a prior cesarean delivery (group 5: 34.8%), and preterm singletons in vertex presentation (group 10: 9.8%) contributed to 73.2% of the relative cesarean delivery frequency for the cohort and were correlated with hospital cesarean delivery frequencies (Spearman's rho = 0.96). Differences in patient characteristics accounted for 34.1% of hospital-level cesarean delivery variation in group 2., Conclusion: The TGCS highlights the contribution of NTSV presentation to cesarean delivery frequencies and the impact of patient characteristics on hospital-level variation in cesarean deliveries among nulliparous patients with induced or absent labor., Key Points: · We report on the cesarean delivery frequencies in a multicenter U.S., Cohort: . · NTSV gestations (groups 1 and 2) are a primary driver of cesarean deliveries.. · Patient characteristics contributed most to hospital variation in cesarean deliveries in group 2.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective:  This study aimed to test the hypothesis that being pregnant and delivering during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with changes in gestational weight gain (GWG) or frequency of small- (SGA) or large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates., Study Design:  Secondary analysis of a multicenter observational cohort comparing pregnant people who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic (June-December 2020) to people who delivered prior to the pandemic (March-December 2019). Those with multiple gestations, fetuses with major congenital anomalies, implausible GWG values, unavailable body mass index (BMI), or who were severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2-positive were excluded. The primary outcome was frequency of optimal recommended GWG based on prepregnancy BMI. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, ponderal index, and frequency of SGA, LGA, and small head circumference for live births. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess associations between exposure to the pandemic and outcomes., Results:  A total of 10,717 pregnant people were included in our analysis. A total of 4,225 pregnant people were exposed to the pandemic and 6,492 pregnant people delivered prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pregnant people exposed to the pandemic were older and more likely to have gestational diabetes. The frequency of appropriate GWG was 28.0% during the pandemic and 27.6% before the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.11). Excessive GWG was more likely (54.9 vs. 53.1%; aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.001-1.17), and inadequate GWG was less likely during the pandemic (17.0 vs. 19.3%; aOR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95). The frequency of SGA was 5.4% during the pandemic and 6.1% before the pandemic (aOR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.76-1.06), and the frequency of LGA was 16.0% during the pandemic versus 15.0% before the pandemic (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95-1.18). Other neonatal outcomes including birth weight percentile (62.1 [35.8-83.2] vs. 60.2 [34.4-82.2]; adjusted mean difference (aMD) = 1.50, 95% CI: -0.28 to 3.29), ponderal index (2.6 g/cm 3 [2.4-2.8] in both groups; aMD = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.02), and small head circumference for livebirths (<10th percentile [8.2 vs. 8.1%; aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.19], <3rd percentile [3.5 vs. 3.1%; aOR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.93-1.44]) were similar between groups as well., Conclusion:  Being pregnant and delivering during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a higher likelihood of excessive GWG and a lower likelihood of inadequate GWG., Key Points: · Delivering during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with higher likelihood of excessive GWG.. · Delivering during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with lower likelihood of inadequate GWG.. · COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with changes in frequency of SGA or LGA.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Importance: The Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) trial changed clinical practice in the United States by finding that antenatal betamethasone at 34 to 36 weeks decreased short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. However, the trial also found increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia after betamethasone. This follow-up study focused on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after late preterm steroids., Objective: To evaluate whether administration of late preterm (34-36 completed weeks) corticosteroids affected childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes., Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective follow-up study of children aged 6 years or older whose birthing parent had enrolled in the multicenter randomized clinical trial, conducted at 13 centers that participated in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network cycle from 2011-2016. Follow-up was from 2017-2022., Exposure: Twelve milligrams of intramuscular betamethasone administered twice 24 hours apart., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome of this follow-up study was a General Conceptual Ability score less than 85 (-1 SD) on the Differential Ability Scales, 2nd Edition (DAS-II). Secondary outcomes included the Gross Motor Function Classification System level and Social Responsiveness Scale and Child Behavior Checklist scores. Multivariable analyses adjusted for prespecified variables known to be associated with the primary outcome. Sensitivity analyses used inverse probability weighting and also modeled the outcome for those lost to follow-up., Results: Of 2831 children, 1026 enrolled and 949 (479 betamethasone, 470 placebo) completed the DAS-II at a median age of 7 years (IQR, 6.6-7.6 years). Maternal, neonatal, and childhood characteristics were similar between groups except that neonatal hypoglycemia was more common in the betamethasone group. There were no differences in the primary outcome, a general conceptual ability score less than 85, which occurred in 82 (17.1%) of the betamethasone vs 87 (18.5%) of the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.22). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed. Sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weighting or assigning outcomes to children lost to follow-up also found no differences between groups., Conclusion and Relevance: In this follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial, administration of antenatal corticosteroids to persons at risk of late preterm delivery, originally shown to improve short-term neonatal respiratory outcomes but with an increased rate of hypoglycemia, was not associated with adverse childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 6 years or older.

Background: The optimal timing of amniotomy during labor induction is a topic of ongoing debate due to the potential risks associated with both amniotomy and prolonged labor. As such, individuals in the field of obstetrics and gynecology must carefully evaluate the associated benefits and drawbacks of this procedure. While amniotomy can expedite the labor process, it may also lead to complications such as umbilical cord prolapse, fetal distress, and infection. Therefore, a careful and thorough examination of the risks and benefits of amniotomy during labor induction is essential in making an informed decision regarding the optimal timing of this procedure., Objective: This study aimed to determine if an amniotomy within 2 hours after Foley balloon removal reduced the duration of active labor and time taken to achieve vaginal delivery when compared with an amniotomy ≥4 hours after balloon removal among term pregnant women who underwent labor induction., Study Design: This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial that was conducted at a single academic center from October 2020 to March 2023. Term participants who were eligible for preinduction cervical ripening with a Foley balloon were randomized into 2 groups, namely the early amniotomy (rupture of membranes within 2 hours after Foley balloon removal) and delayed amniotomy (rupture of membranes performed more than 4 hours after Foley balloon removal) groups. Randomization was stratified by parity. The primary outcome was time from Foley balloon insertion to active phase of labor. Secondary outcomes, including time to delivery, cesarean delivery rates, and maternal and neonatal complications, were analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses., Results: Of the 150 participants who consented and were enrolled, 149 were included in the analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, an early amniotomy did not significantly shorten the time between Foley balloon insertion and active labor when compared with a delayed amniotomy (885 vs 975 minutes; P=.08). An early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time from Foley balloon placement to active labor in nulliparous individuals (1211; 584-2340 vs 1585; 683-2760; P=.02). When evaluating the secondary outcomes, an early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time to active labor onset (312.5 vs 442.5 minutes; P=.02) and delivery (484 vs 587 minutes; P=.03) from Foley balloon removal with a higher rate of delivery within 36 hours (96% vs 85%; P=.03). Individuals in the early amniotomy group reached active labor 1.5 times faster after Foley balloon insertion than those in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.2; P=.02). Those with an early amniotomy also reached vaginal delivery 1.5 times faster after Foley balloon removal than those in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1-2.2; P=.03). A delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (0% vs 9.5%; P=.01). No significant differences were observed in the cesarean delivery rates, length of hospital stay, maternal infection, or neonatal outcomes., Conclusion: Although an early amniotomy does not shorten the time from Foley balloon insertion to active labor, it shortens time from Foley balloon removal to active labor and delivery without increasing complications. The increased postpartum hemorrhage rate in the delayed amniotomy group suggests increased risks with delayed amniotomy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate whether there is an association between in-utero exposure to nicotine and subsequent hearing dysfunction., Materials and Methods: Secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection among gravidas with primary CMV infection was conducted. Monthly intravenous immunoglobulin hyperimmune globulin therapy did not influence the rate of congenital CMV. Dyads with missing urine, fetal or neonatal demise, infants diagnosed with a major congenital anomaly, congenital CMV infection, or with evidence of middle ear dysfunction were excluded. The primary outcome was neonatal hearing impairment in one or more ears defined as abnormal distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs; 1 to 8 kHz) that were measured within 42 days of birth. DPOAEs were interpreted using optimized frequency-specific level criteria. Cotinine was measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits in maternal urine collected at enrollment and in the third trimester (mean gestational age 16.0 and 36.7 weeks, respectively). Blinded personnel ran samples in duplicates. Maternal urine cotinine >5 ng/mL at either time point was defined as in-utero exposure to nicotine. Multivariable logistic regression included variables associated with the primary outcome and with the exposure ( p  < 0.05) in univariate analysis., Results: Of 399 enrolled patients in the original trial, 150 were included in this analysis, of whom 46 (31%) were exposed to nicotine. The primary outcome occurred in 18 (12%) newborns and was higher in nicotine-exposed infants compared with those nonexposed (15.2 vs. 10.6%, odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-4.20), but the difference was not significantly different (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.0, 95% CI 0.30-3.31). This association was similar when exposure was stratified as heavy (>100 ng/mL, aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.15-3.51) or mild (5-100 ng/mL, aOR 1.28, 95% CI 0.33-4.95). There was no association between nicotine exposure and frequency-specific DPOAE amplitude., Conclusion: In a cohort of parturients with primary CMV infection, nicotine exposure was not associated with offspring hearing dysfunction assessed with DPOAEs., Key Points: · Nicotine exposure was quantified from maternal urine.. · Nicotine exposure was identified in 30% of the cohort.. · Exposure was not associated with offspring hearing dysfunction.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether being small for gestational age (SGA) or large for gestational age (LGA) or having a small or large head circumference (HC) at birth is associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes., Study Design: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter negative randomized trial of thyroxine therapy for subclinical hypothyroid disorders in pregnancy. The primary outcome was child intelligence quotient (IQ) at 5 years of age. Secondary outcomes included several neurodevelopmental measures. Associations between the outcomes in children with SGA (<10th percentile) or LGA (>90th percentile) birth weights, using ethnicity- and sex-specific population nomogram as well as nomograms from the National Fetal Growth (NFG) study, were compared with the referent of those with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) birth weight. Similar analyses were performed for HC., Results: Using the population nomogram, 90 (8.2%) were SGA and 112 (10.2%) were LGA. SGA neonates were more likely to be born preterm to mothers who were younger, smoked, and were less likely to have less than a high school education, whereas LGA neonates were more likely to be born to mothers who were older and have higher body mass index, compared with AGA neonates. SGA at birth was associated with a decrease in the child IQ at 5 years of age by 3.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-6.14) points, and an increase in odds of child with an IQ < 85 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2). There was no association between SGA and other secondary outcomes, or between LGA and the primary or secondary outcomes. Using the NFG standards, SGA at birth remained associated with a decrease in the child IQ at 5 years of age by 3.14 (95% CI, 0.22-6.05) points and higher odds of an IQ < 85 (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.1), but none of the other secondary outcomes. HC was not associated with the primary outcome, and there were no consistent associations of these standards with the secondary outcomes., Conclusion: In this cohort of pregnant individuals with hypothyroid disorders, SGA birth weight was associated with a decrease in child IQ and greater odds of child IQ < 85 at 5 years of age. Using a fetal growth standard did not appear to improve the detection of newborns at risk of adverse neurodevelopment., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the effects of applying tension to a transcervical Foley balloon on delivery time in term nulliparous patients undergoing labor induction., Methods: This cluster randomized clinical trial included 279 term nulliparous women presenting for labor induction with a plan for cervical ripening through transcervical Foley balloon placement. Participants were assigned to either the tension group (n=138) or the no-tension group (n=141) on the basis of randomized, weekly clusters (26 total clusters). The primary outcome measured was the time from initial Foley balloon insertion to delivery. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery rates, peripartum infection, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Our prior data suggested that delivery time in the tension group would be about 1,053 minutes. We estimated a sample size of 260 (130 per group, 26 clusters) on the basis of a 25% difference, power of 80%, and two-sided α of 0.05., Results: A total of 279 term nulliparous patients were included in the analysis. The median time from Foley placement to delivery was 1,596 minutes (range 430-3,438 minutes) for the tension group and 1,621 minutes (range 488-3,323 minutes) for the no-tension group ( P =.8); similar results were noted for time to vaginal delivery. No significant differences were observed in the secondary outcomes, including the rates of cesarean delivery (34.1% vs 29.8%, P =.7), peripartum infection, and NICU admission, between the two groups., Conclusion: Applying tension to a transcervical Foley balloon in term nulliparous women undergoing labor induction did not significantly reduce delivery time or improve secondary outcomes., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05404776., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate whether iodine status in pregnant patients with either subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia in the first half of pregnancy is associated with measures of behavior and neurodevelopment in children through the age of 5 years., Study Design: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter study consisting of two randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled treatment trials conducted in parallel. Patients with a singleton gestation before 20 weeks' gestation underwent thyroid screening using serum thyrotropin and free thyroxine. Participants with subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia were randomized to levothyroxine replacement or an identical placebo. At randomization, maternal urine was collected and stored for subsequent urinary iodine excretion analysis. Urinary iodine concentrations greater than 150 μg/L were considered iodine sufficient, and concentrations of 150 μg/L or less were considered iodine insufficient. The primary outcome was a full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) score at the age of 5 years, the general conceptual ability score from the Differential Ability Scales-II at the age of 3 if IQ was not available, or death before 3 years., Results: A total of 677 pregnant participants with subclinical hypothyroidism and 526 with hypothyroxinemia were randomized. The primary outcome was available in 1,133 (94%) of children. Overall, 684 (60%) of mothers were found to have urinary iodine concentrations >150 μg/L. Children of iodine-sufficient participants with subclinical hypothyroidism had similar primary outcome scores when compared to children of iodine-insufficient participants (95 [84-105] vs. 96 [87-109], P adj  = 0.73). After adjustment, there was also no difference in IQ scores among children of participants with hypothyroxinemia at 5 to 7 years of age (94 [85 - 102] and 91 [81 - 100], P adj 1/4 0.11). Treatment with levothyroxine was not associated with neurodevelopmental or behavioral outcomes regardless of maternal iodine status ( p  > 0.05)., Conclusion: Maternal urinary iodine concentrations ≤150 μg/L were not associated with abnormal cognitive or behavioral outcomes in offspring of participants with either subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia., Key Points: · Most pregnant patients with subclinical thyroid disease are iodine sufficient.. · Mild maternal iodine insufficiency is not associated with lower offspring IQ at 5 years.. · Iodine supplementation in subclinical thyroid disease is unlikely to improve IQ.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation, is a leading cause of perinatal and infant mortality throughout the world. Preterm birth is also associated with long-term neurological disabilities and other significant health issues in children. A short cervix in the second trimester has been noted to be one of the strongest predictors of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth in both singleton and multiple pregnancies. Some studies have shown that cervical support in the form of an Arabin pessary lowers the risk of preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation and short cervical length; however, other studies have conflicting results. Our objective was to form an international collaborative of planned or ongoing randomized trials of pessary in singleton and twin gestations with a short cervix., Study Design: In November 2014, an international group of investigators, who had initiated or were planning randomized trials of pessary for pregnant people with a short cervix and singleton or twin gestation to prevent preterm birth, formed a collaboration to plan a prospective individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized trials (PROspective Meta-analysis of Pessary Trials [PROMPT]). The PROMPT investigators agreed on meta-analysis IPD hypotheses for singletons and twins, eligibility criteria, and a set of core baseline and outcome measures. The primary outcome is a composite of fetal death or preterm delivery before 32 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidities. The PROMPT protocol may be viewed as a written agreement among the study investigators who make up the PROMPT consortium (PROSPERO ID# CRD42018067740)., Results: Results will be published in phases as the individual participating studies are concluded and published. Results of the first phase of singleton and twin pessary trials are expected to be available in late 2022. Updates are planned as participating trials are completed and published., Key Points: · Short cervical length predicts preterm birth.. · Results of prior cervical pessary trials are mixed.. · Meta-analysis of pessary trials protocol.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ANCS) is recommended for individuals expected to deliver between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Properly timed administration of ANCS achieves maximal benefit. However, more than 50% of individuals receive ANCS outside the recommended window. This study aimed to examine maternal and hospital factors associated with suboptimal receipt of ANCS among individuals who deliver between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation., Study Design: Secondary analysis of the Assessment of Perinatal Excellence (APEX), an observational study of births to 115,502 individuals at 25 hospitals in the United States from March 2008 to February 2011, was conducted. Data from 3,123 individuals who gave birth to a nonanomalous live-born infant between 24 0/7 to 34 0/7 weeks of gestation, had prenatal records available at delivery, and data available on the timing of ANCS use were included in this analysis. Eligible individuals' ANCS status was categorized as optimal (full course completed >24 hours after ANCS but not >7 days before birth) or suboptimal (none, too late, or too early). Maternal and hospital-level variables were compared using optimal as the referent group. Hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models, with site as a random effect, were used to identify maternal and hospital-level characteristics associated with optimal ANCS use., Results: Overall, 83.6% (2,612/3,123) of eligible individuals received any treatment: 1,216 (38.9%) optimal and 1,907 (61.1%) suboptimal. Within suboptimal group, 495 (15.9%) received ANCS too late, 901 (28.9%) too early, and 511 (16.4%) did not receive any ANCS. Optimal ANCS varied depending on indication for hospital admission ( p  < 0.001). Individuals who were admitted with intent to deliver were less likely to receive optimal ANCS while individuals admitted for hypertensive diseases of pregnancy were most likely to receive optimal ANCS (10 vs. 35%). The median gestational age of individuals who received optimal ANCS was 31.0 weeks. Adjusting for hospital factors, hospitals with electronic medical records and who receive transfers have fewer eligible individuals who did not receive ANCS. ANCS administration and timing varied substantially by hospital, optimal frequencies ranged from 9.1 to 51.3%, and none frequencies from 6.1 to 61.8%. When evaluating variation by hospital site, models with maternal and hospital factors did not explain any of the variation in ANCS use., Conclusion: Optimal ANCS use varied by maternal and hospital factors and by hospital site, indicating opportunities for improvement., Key Points: · Majority of individuals who deliver between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation do not receive properly timed antenatal corticosteroids.. · Optimal use of antenatal corticosteroids varies by maternal and hospital factors and hospital site.. · Significant variation in hospital sites regarding optimally timed administration of antenatal corticosteroids indicates opportunities for improvement.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether there are genetic variants associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants., Study Design: We conducted a candidate gene association study in two well-defined cohorts of ELBW infants (<1,000 g). One cohort was for discovery and the other for replication. The discovery case-control analysis utilized anonymized DNA samples and evaluated 1,614 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 145 genes concentrated in inflammation, angiogenesis, brain development, and oxidation pathways. Cases were children who died by age one or who were diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP) or neurodevelopmental delay (Bayley II mental developmental index [MDI] or psychomotor developmental index [PDI] < 70) by 18 to 22 months. Controls were survivors with normal neurodevelopment. We assessed significant epidemiological variables and SNPs associated with the combined outcome of CP or death, CP, mental delay (MDI < 70) and motor delay (PDI < 70). Multivariable analyses adjusted for gestational age at birth, small for gestational age, sex, antenatal corticosteroids, multiple gestation, racial admixture, and multiple comparisons. SNPs associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes with p  < 0.01 were selected for validation in the replication cohort. Successful replication was defined as p  < 0.05 in the replication cohort., Results: Of 1,013 infants analyzed (452 cases, 561 controls) in the discovery cohort, 917 were successfully genotyped for >90% of SNPs and passed quality metrics. After adjusting for covariates, 26 SNPs with p  < 0.01 for one or more outcomes were selected for replication cohort validation, which included 362 infants (170 cases and 192 controls). A variant in SERPINE1, which encodes plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI1), was associated with the combined outcome of CP or death in the discovery analysis ( p  = 4.1 × 10 -4 ) and was significantly associated with CP or death in the replication cohort (adjusted odd ratio: 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.2-1.0; p  = 0.039)., Conclusion: A genetic variant in SERPINE1, involved in inflammation and coagulation, is associated with CP or death among ELBW infants., Key Points: · Early preterm and ELBW infants have dramatically increased risks of CP and developmental delay.. · A genetic variant in SERPINE1 is associated with CP or death among ELBW infants.. · The SERPINE1 gene encodes the serine protease inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered: a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared., Results: Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI: 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82), respectively ( p  = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion., Conclusion: Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S., Cohort: Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed., Key Points: · A total of 3.9% of individuals received a blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission.. · Three models used in clinical practice are externally valid for blood transfusion prediction.. · Institutional model selection should be based on ease of application until further research identifies the optimal approach.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to assess the association of maternal body mass index (BMI) with a composite of severe maternal outcomes., Study Design: Secondary analysis of a cohort of deliveries on randomly selected days at 25 hospitals from 2008 to 2011. Data on comorbid conditions, intrapartum events, and postpartum course were collected. The reference group (REF, BMI: 18.5-29.9kg/m 2 ), obese (OB; BMI: 30-39.9kg/m 2 ), morbidly obese (MO; BMI: 40-49.9kg/m 2 ), and super morbidly obese (SMO; BMI ≥ 50kg/m 2 ) women were compared. The composite of severe maternal outcomes was defined as death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilator use, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus (DVT/PE), sepsis, hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), unplanned operative procedure, or stroke. Patients in the REF group were matched 1:1 with those in all other obesity groups based on propensity score using the baseline characteristics of age, race/ethnicity, previous cesarean, preexisting diabetes, chronic hypertension, parity, cigarette use, and insurance status. Multivariable Poisson's regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between BMI and the composite outcome. Because cesarean delivery may be in the causal pathway between obesity and adverse maternal outcomes, models were then adjusted for mode of delivery to evaluate potential mediation., Results: A total of 52,162 pregnant patients are included in the analysis. Risk of composite maternal outcomes was increased for SMO compared with REF but not for OB and MO [OB: aRR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.99-1.14; MO: aRR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.97-1.25; SMO: aRR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.70]. However, in the mediation analysis, cesarean appears to mediate 46% (95% CI: 31-50%) of the risk of severe morbidity for SMO compared with REF., Conclusion: Super morbid obesity is significantly associated with increased serious maternal morbidity and mortality; however, cesarean appears to mediate this association. Obesity and morbid obesity are not associated with maternal morbidity and mortality., Key Points: · Super morbid obesity is associated with increased morbidity.. · Cesarean appears to mediate the association between super morbid obesity and morbidity.. · Obesity and morbid maternal obesity are not associated with morbidity.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) ST changes are associated with fetal cardiac hypoxia. Our objective was to evaluate ST changes by maternal diabetic status and stage of labor., Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a multicentered randomized-controlled trial in which laboring patients with singleton gestations underwent fetal ECG scalp electrode placement and were randomly assigned to masked or unmasked ST-segment readings. Our primary outcome was the frequency of fetal ECG tracings with ST changes by the stage of labor. ECG tracings were categorized into mutually exclusive groups (ST depression, ST elevation without ST depression, or no ST changes). We compared participants with DM, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and no DM., Results: Of the 5,436 eligible individuals in the first stage of labor (95 with pregestational DM and 370 with GDM), 4,427 progressed to the second stage. ST depression occurred more frequently in the first stage of labor in participants with pregestational DM (15%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-4.24) and with GDM (9.5%, aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.25) as compared with participants without DM (5.7%). The frequency of ST elevation was similar in participants with pregestational DM (33%, aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.48-1.30) and GDM (33.2%, aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-1.17) as compared with those without DM (34.2%). In the second stage, ST depression did not occur in participants with pregestational DM (0%) and occurred more frequently in participants with GDM (3.5%, aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.02-3.98) as compared with those without DM (2.0%). ST elevation occurred more frequently in participants with pregestational DM (30%, aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.02-3.22) but not with GDM (19.0%, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.47) as compared with those without DM (17.8%)., Conclusion: ST changes in fetal ECG occur more frequently in fetuses of diabetic mothers during labor., Clinicaltrials: gov number, NCT01131260., Precis: ST changes in fetal ECG, a marker of fetal cardiac hypoxia, occur more frequently in fetuses of diabetic parturients., Key Points: · Fetal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and cardiac dysfunction occur frequently among fetuses of diabetic patients.. · Fetal ECG changes such as ST elevation and depression reflect cardiac hypoxia.. · Fetuses of diabetic patients demonstrate a higher prevalence of fetal ECG tracings with ST changes.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Pregnant patients are often on immunosuppressant medications, most commonly to manage transplantation or autoimmune disorders. Most immunosuppressant agents, including tacrolimus, corticosteroids, azathioprine, and calcineurin inhibitors, are safe during pregnancy and lactation. However, mycophenolic acid is associated with higher risks of birth defects and should be avoided in pregnancy. Tacrolimus, the commonly used drug in transplantation medicine and autoimmune disorders, requires monitoring of serum levels for dose adjustment, particularly during pregnancy. Although no pregnancy-specific therapeutic range exists, the general target range is 5-15 ng/mL, and pregnant patients may require higher doses to achieve therapeutic levels. Adherence to prescribed immunosuppressive regimens is crucial to prevent graft rejection and autoimmune disorder flare-ups. This review aims to provide essential information about the use of immunosuppressant medications in pregnant individuals. With a rising number of pregnant patients undergoing organ transplantations or having autoimmune disorders, it is important to understand the implications of the use of these medications during pregnancy., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is rapidly increasing in the United States. We hypothesized that prediction models using data obtained during pregnancy can accurately predict the future development of metabolic syndrome., Objective: This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict the development of metabolic syndrome using factors ascertained in nulliparous pregnant individuals., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study (Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be Heart Health Study [nuMoM2b-HHS]). Data were collected from October 2010 to October 2020, and analyzed from July 2023 to October 2023. Participants had in-person visits 2 to 7 years after their first delivery. The primary outcome was metabolic syndrome, defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria, which was measured within 2 to 7 years after delivery. A total of 127 variables that were obtained during pregnancy were evaluated. The data set was randomly split into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). We developed a random forest model and a lasso regression model using variables obtained during pregnancy. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both models. Using the model with the better area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, we developed models that included fewer variables based on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values and compared them with the original model. The final model chosen would have fewer variables and noninferior areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve., Results: A total of 4225 individuals met the inclusion criteria; the mean (standard deviation) age was 27.0 (5.6) years. Of these, 754 (17.8%) developed metabolic syndrome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the random forest model was 0.878 (95% confidence interval, 0.846-0.909), which was higher than the 0.850 of the lasso model (95% confidence interval, 0.811-0.888; P<.001). Therefore, random forest models using fewer variables were developed. The random forest model with the top 3 variables (high-density lipoprotein, insulin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) was chosen as the final model because it had the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.867 (95% confidence interval, 0.839-0.895), which was not inferior to the original model (P=.08). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the final model in the test set was 0.847 (95% confidence interval, 0.821-0.873). An online application of the final model was developed (https://kawakita.shinyapps.io/metabolic/)., Conclusion: We developed a model that can accurately predict the development of metabolic syndrome in 2 to 7 years after delivery., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Severe maternal morbidity has been increasing in the past few decades. Few studies have examined the risk of severe maternal morbidity among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries., Objective: This study aimed to examine the prevalence and risk of severe maternal morbidity among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries during delivery hospitalization as a primary outcome and during the postpartum period as a secondary outcome., Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificate data linked to hospital discharge records from California (2008-2018), Michigan (2008-2020), Missouri (2008-2014), Pennsylvania (2008-2014), and South Carolina (2008-2020). Relative risk regression analysis was used to examine the crude and adjusted relative risks of severe maternal morbidity along with 95% confidence intervals among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries, adjusting for birth year, state of residence, maternal sociodemographic characteristics, and the obstetric comorbidity index., Results: Of the 8,694,912 deliveries, 35,012 (0.40%) were stillbirths. Compared with individuals with live-birth deliveries, those with stillbirths were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (10.8% vs 20.5%); have Medicaid (46.5% vs 52.0%); have pregnancy complications, including preexisting diabetes mellitus (1.1% vs 4.3%), preexisting hypertension (2.3% vs 6.2%), and preeclampsia (4.4% vs 8.4%); have multiple pregnancies (1.6% vs 6.2%); and reside in South Carolina (7.4% vs 11.6%). During delivery hospitalization, the prevalence rates of severe maternal morbidity were 791 cases per 10,000 deliveries for stillbirths and 154 cases per 10,000 deliveries for live-birth deliveries, whereas the prevalence rates for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity were 502 cases per 10,000 deliveries for stillbirths and 68 cases per 10,000 deliveries for live-birth deliveries. The crude relative risk for severe maternal morbidity was 5.1 (95% confidence interval, 4.9-5.3), whereas the adjusted relative risk was 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.8). For nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity among stillbirths vs live-birth deliveries, the crude relative risk was 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 7.0-7.7), whereas the adjusted relative risk was 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.3). This risk was not only elevated among individuals with stillbirth during the delivery hospitalization but also through 1 year after delivery (severe maternal morbidity adjusted relative risk, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.4; nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity adjusted relative risk, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3)., Conclusion: Stillbirth was found to be an important contributor to severe maternal morbidity., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To characterize breastfeeding behaviors and identify factors associated with breastfeeding initiation among people with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational cohort of pregnant people with singleton gestations and HCV seropositivity. This analysis includes individuals with data on breastfeeding initiation and excludes those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection. The primary outcome was self-reported initiation of breastfeeding or provision of expressed breast milk. Secondary outcomes included duration of breastfeeding. Demographic and obstetric characteristics were compared between those who initiated breastfeeding and those who did not to identify associated factors. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed., Results: Overall, 579 individuals (75.0% of participants in the parent study) were included. Of those, 362 (62.5%) initiated breastfeeding or provided breast milk to their infants, with a median duration of breastfeeding of 1.4 months (interquartile range 0.5-6.0). People with HCV viremia , defined as a detectable viral load at any point during pregnancy, were less likely to initiate breastfeeding than those who had an undetectable viral load (59.4 vs 71.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.61, 95% CI, 0.41-0.92). People with private insurance were more likely to initiate breastfeeding compared with those with public insurance or no insurance (80.0 vs 60.1%; aOR 2.43, 95% CI, 1.31-4.50)., Conclusion: Although HCV seropositivity is not a contraindication to breastfeeding regardless of viral load, rates of breastfeeding initiation were lower among people with HCV viremia than among those with an undetectable viral load., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01959321 ., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Alan T.N. Tita reports money was paid to his institution from Pfizer. Torri D. Metz reports receiving royalties from UpToDate for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, when she was a site PI for Phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial, and when she was a site PI for a pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Geeta K Swamy reports receiving payment from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, UpToDate, Sanofi, Medscape, and Moderna. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In randomized trials, 1 primary outcome is typically chosen to evaluate the consequences of an intervention, whereas other important outcomes are relegated to secondary outcomes. This issue is amplified for many obstetrical trials in which an intervention may have consequences for both the pregnant person and the child. In contrast, desirability of outcome ranking, a paradigm shift for the design and analysis of clinical trials based on patient-centric evaluation, allows multiple outcomes-including from >1 individual-to be considered concurrently., Objective: This study aimed to describe desirability of outcome ranking methodology tailored to obstetrical trials and to apply the methodology to maternal-perinatal paired (dyadic) outcomes in which both individuals may be affected by an intervention but may experience discordant outcomes (eg, an obstetrical intervention may improve perinatal but worsen maternal outcomes)., Study Design: This secondary analysis applies the desirability of outcome ranking methodology to data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network ARRIVE trial. The original analysis found no substantial difference in the primary (perinatal composite) outcome, but a decreased risk of the secondary outcome of cesarean delivery with elective induction at 39 weeks. In the present desirability-of-outcome-ranking analysis, dyadic outcomes ranging from spontaneous vaginal delivery without severe neonatal complication (most desirable) to cesarean delivery with perinatal death (least desirable) were classified into 8 categories ranked by overall desirability by experienced investigators. Distributions of the desirability of outcome ranking were compared by estimating the probability of having a more desirable dyadic outcome with elective induction at 39 weeks of gestation than with expectant management. To account for various perspectives on these outcomes, a complementary analysis, called the partial credit strategy, was used to grade outcomes on a 100-point scale and estimate the difference in overall treatment scores between groups using a t test., Results: All 6096 participants from the trial were included. The probability of a better dyadic outcome for a randomly selected patient who was randomized to elective induction was 53% (95% confidence interval, 51-54), implying that elective induction led to a better overall outcome for the dyad when taking multiple outcomes into account concurrently. Furthermore, the desirability-of-outcome-ranking probability of averting cesarean delivery with elective induction was 52% (95% confidence interval, 51-53), which was not at the expense of an operative vaginal delivery or a poorer outcome for the perinate (ie, survival with a severe neonatal complication or perinatal death). Randomization to elective induction was also advantageous in most of the partial credit score scenarios., Conclusion: Desirability-of-outcome-ranking methodology is a useful tool for obstetrical trials because it provides a concurrent view of the effect of an intervention on multiple dyadic outcomes, potentially allowing for better translation of data for decision-making and person-centered care., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Pregnancy induces unique physiologic changes to the immune response and hormonal changes leading to plausible differences in the risk of developing post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), or Long COVID. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy may also have long-term ramifications for exposed offspring, and it is critical to evaluate the health outcomes of exposed children. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Multi-site Observational Study of PASC aims to evaluate the long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in various populations. RECOVER-Pregnancy was designed specifically to address long-term outcomes in maternal-child dyads., Methods: RECOVER-Pregnancy cohort is a combined prospective and retrospective cohort that proposes to enroll 2,300 individuals with a pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic and their offspring exposed and unexposed in utero, including single and multiple gestations. Enrollment will occur both in person at 27 sites through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Health Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network and remotely through national recruitment by the study team at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). Adults with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy are eligible for enrollment in the pregnancy cohort and will follow the protocol for RECOVER-Adult including validated screening tools, laboratory analyses and symptom questionnaires followed by more in-depth phenotyping of PASC on a subset of the overall cohort. Offspring exposed and unexposed in utero to SARS-CoV-2 maternal infection will undergo screening tests for neurodevelopment and other health outcomes at 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months of age. Blood specimens will be collected at 24 months of age for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, storage and anticipated later analyses proposed by RECOVER and other investigators., Discussion: RECOVER-Pregnancy will address whether having SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy modifies the risk factors, prevalence, and phenotype of PASC. The pregnancy cohort will also establish whether there are increased risks of adverse long-term outcomes among children exposed in utero., Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05172011., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr. Metz reports personal fees from Pfizer for her role as a medical consultant for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy study, grants from Pfizer for role as a site PI for RSV vaccination in pregnancy study, and grants from Gestvision for role as a site PI for a preeclampsia study outside the submitted work. Dr. Horwitz reported serving as a member of the National Academy of Medicine Committee on the Long-Term Health Effects Stemming from COVID-19 and Implications for the Social Security Administration. Dr. Costantine reported receiving grant support for work not related to this paper from Baxter International and Siemens Healthcare and personal consulting fees not related to this paper from Progenity and Siemens Healthcare. These disclosures do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2023 Metz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Importance: Cannabis use is increasing among reproductive-age individuals and the risks associated with cannabis exposure during pregnancy remain uncertain., Objective: To evaluate the association between maternal cannabis use and adverse pregnancy outcomes known to be related to placental function., Design, Setting, and Participants: Ancillary analysis of nulliparous individuals treated at 8 US medical centers with stored urine samples and abstracted pregnancy outcome data available. Participants in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be cohort were recruited from 2010 through 2013; the drug assays and analyses for this ancillary project were completed from June 2020 through April 2023., Exposure: Cannabis exposure was ascertained by urine immunoassay for 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol using frozen stored urine samples from study visits during the pregnancy gestational age windows of 6 weeks and 0 days to 13 weeks and 6 days (visit 1); 16 weeks and 0 days to 21 weeks and 6 days (visit 2); and 22 weeks and 0 days to 29 weeks and 6 days (visit 3). Positive results were confirmed with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The timing of cannabis exposure was defined as only during the first trimester or ongoing exposure beyond the first trimester., Main Outcome and Measure: The dichotomous primary composite outcome included small-for-gestational-age birth, medically indicated preterm birth, stillbirth, or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy ascertained by medical record abstraction by trained perinatal research staff with adjudication of outcomes by site investigators., Results: Of 10 038 participants, 9257 were eligible for this analysis. Of the 610 participants (6.6%) with cannabis use, 32.4% (n = 197) had cannabis exposure only during the first trimester and 67.6% (n = 413) had ongoing exposure beyond the first trimester. Cannabis exposure was associated with the primary composite outcome (25.9% in the cannabis exposure group vs 17.4% in the no exposure group; adjusted relative risk, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.07-1.49]) in the propensity score-weighted analyses after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index, medical comorbidities, and active nicotine use ascertained via urine cotinine assays. In a 3-category cannabis exposure model (no exposure, exposure only during the first trimester, or ongoing exposure), cannabis use during the first trimester only was not associated with the primary composite outcome; however, ongoing cannabis use was associated with the primary composite outcome (adjusted relative risk, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.09-1.60])., Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter cohort, maternal cannabis use ascertained by biological sampling was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes related to placental dysfunction.

Background: Previous studies identified microscopic changes associated with intrauterine retention of stillbirths based on clinical time of death. The objective of this study was to utilize unsupervised machine learning (not reliant on subjective measures) to identify features associated with time from death to delivery. Methods: Data were derived from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Features were chosen a priori for entry into hierarchical cluster analysis, including fetal and placental changes. Results: A four-cluster solution (coefficient = 0.983) correlated with relative time periods of "no retention," "mild retention," "moderate retention," and "severe retention." Loss of nuclear basophilia within fetal organs were found at varying rates among these clusters. Conclusions: Hierarchical cluster analysis is able to classify stillbirths based on histopathological changes, roughly correlating to length of intrauterine retention. Such clusters, which rely solely on objective fetal and placental findings, can help clinicians more accurately assess the interval from death to delivery.

Objective: To evaluate the association between maternal blood pressure (BP) below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and pregnancy outcomes., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy), an open label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Participants with mean BP below 140/90 mm Hg were grouped as below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg by averaging postrandomization clinic BP throughout pregnancy. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA)., Results: Of 2,408 patients in CHAP, 2,096 met study criteria; 1,328 had mean BP 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and 768 had mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg were more likely to be older, on antihypertensive medication, in the active treatment arm, and to have lower BP at enrollment. Mean clinic BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with lower frequency of the primary outcome (16.0% vs 35.8%, adjusted relative risk 0.45; 95% CI 0.38-0.54) as well as lower risk of severe preeclampsia and indicated birth before 35 weeks of gestation. There was no association with SGA., Conclusion: In pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension, mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes without increased risk of SGA., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Alan T.N. Tita reported money was paid to his institution by Pfizer for his efforts on this study. Torri D. Metz disclosed money was paid to her from UpToDate for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean, and money was paid to her institution from Gestvision as a site PI for a preeclampsia point-of-care test; her institution received money to conduct the study (ended August 2020). She has been a site PI for Pfizer on a phase III RSV vaccine trial, and her institution received money to conduct the study. She has also been a member of the Pfizer medical advisory board (1/15/21) and site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy. She has served on the SMFM Board of Directors. Lorraine Dugoff reports money was paid to her institution from Laboratory Holdings, Inc. and Natera, Inc. Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving payment from UpToDate. Mary E. Norton reports receiving payment from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski disclosed he is a consultant for Cooper Surgical, Inc, and has received payment from Organon. Namasivayam Ambalayanan reports receiving payment from Resbiotic/AlveolusBio and Shire/Oak Hill Bio. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)