Search

Introduction: Children receiving treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Evidence from pediatric studies support the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in reducing the burden of IFD in children receiving therapy for AML, yet existing antifungal agents have specific limitations and comparative data to inform the optimal prophylactic approach are lacking., Areas Covered: This review summarizes the epidemiology of invasive fungal disease (IFD) and current antifungal prophylaxis recommendations for children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Challenges with currently available antifungal agents and considerations related to the changing landscape of AML therapy are reviewed. A keyword search was conducted to identify pediatric studies regarding IFD and antifungal prophylaxis in children with AML up to December 2023., Expert Opinion: Children undergoing treatment for AML are recommended to receive antifungal prophylaxis to reduce risk of IFD, with tolerability, pharmacokinetics, feasibility of administration, and drug interactions all factors that require consideration in this context. With increased use of novel targeted agents for AML therapy, together with the development of new antifungal agents, data from well-designed clinical studies to optimize prophylactic approaches will be essential to limit the burden of IFD in this vulnerable cohort.

Background: The purpose of this study was to understand how transplant infectious disease (TID) physicians assess a potential donor with known or suspected infection and describe posttransplant management., Methods: We designed a survey of 10 organ offer scenarios and asked questions pertaining to organ acceptability for transplantation and management posttransplant. The survey was distributed to TID clinicians via transplant society listservs and email. Responses were recorded in REDCap, and descriptive statistics were employed., Results: One hundred thirteen infectious disease physicians responded to the survey, of whom 85 completed all cases. Respondents were generally in agreement regarding organ acceptability, although some divergence was seen when evaluating lungs from donors with influenza, tuberculosis, or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection. Posttransplant management showed more variation. Areas of optimization were identified: (1) Further understanding of where risk-mitigation strategies within the donor offer process may improve donor acceptability and therefore organ utilization; (2) importance of recipient considerations in assessing degree of infectious risk; and (3) gaps in evidenced-based data regarding optimal posttransplant management of recipients., Conclusion: Evaluation of donor offers by TID clinicians is a complex process. Although the survey does not itself serve to make recommendations regarding best practices, it highlights areas where generation of data to inform acceptance and management practices may allow for improved organ utilization and recipient management., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: The rising prevalence of difficult-to-treat, deep-seated invasive fungal diseases (IFD) has led to high mortality. Currently available antifungal treatments, administered predominantly orally or intravenously, may not sufficiently penetrate certain body sites, and/or are associated with systemic toxicity. Little is known about how to position alternative administration approaches such as inhalational and direct drug delivery routes., Areas Covered: This review provides an updated overview of unconventional drug delivery strategies for managing IFD, focusing on inhalational (to target the lungs) and direct delivery methods to the central nervous system, bone/joint, and eyes. Novel compounds (e.g. opelconazole) and existing antifungals with innovative drug delivery systems currently undergoing clinical trials and/or used off-label in the clinical setting are discussed., Expert Opinion: For both inhalational agents and direct delivery approaches, there are similar challenges that include the absence of: approved formulations for specific administration routes, delivery vehicles that are simple and safe to use whilst maintaining potency and efficiency of delivery, animal models suitable for investigating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of inhaled antifungals, and consensus on the composite endpoints and intervals for of follow-up in clinical trials. To meet these challenges, cooperation of all stakeholders in drug development and regulation is required.

Background: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a significant complication for children receiving treatment for leukaemia, contributing to morbidity and mortality. Recent regional paediatric epidemiological IFD data are lacking. Additionally uncertainty remains regarding the optimal prophylactic approach in this context., Methods: In a multi-centre Australian cohort study of children diagnosed with de novo acute leukaemia between 1st January 2017 and 30th June 2020, we characterised antifungal prophylaxis prescribing and IFD prevalence. Impact of antifungal prophylaxis was assessed using Kaplan Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazards regression adjusting for known IFD risk factors., Findings: A total of 434 children were included (47.2% female; median age 5.0 years, median follow-up 240 days). This cohort included 351 children with ALL (214 high-risk [HR-ALL]; 137 standard-risk [SR-ALL]), and 73 with AML. The prevalence of proven/probable IFD was 6.8% for AML, 14.0% for HR-ALL and 4.4% for SR-ALL. A mould was implicated as the causative pathogen in almost two thirds of cases. Antifungal prophylaxis was prescribed in 98.7% of chemotherapy cycles for AML, 56.7% for HR-ALL and 14.9% for SR-ALL. A mould-active agent was used in 77.4% of AML cycles and 21.2% of HR-ALL cycles. Mould-active prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of IFD overall and increased IFD-free survival in AML., Interpretation: These data demonstrate the persistent high regional burden of IFD in children with HR-ALL, and the potential for mould-active prophylaxis to ameliorate this. Strategies to increase uptake of appropriate prophylaxis are required in this cohort., Funding: This study was supported by a Perth Children's Hospital Foundation grant (PCHF9973)., Competing Interests: All authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this publication. MS has received honoraria from Gilead and F2G, outside of this work and participates on a Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Basilea, Pfizer, Roche and Merck. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Crown Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: The human gut microbiota has the potential to modulate the outcomes of several human diseases. This effect is likely to be mediated through interaction with the host immune system. This protocol details the establishment of a biorepository of clinically annotated samples, which we will use to explore correlations between the gut microbiota and the immune system of immune-compromised patients. We aim to identify microbiome-related risk factors for adverse outcomes., Methods and Analyses: This is a protocol for the development of a biorepository of clinically annotated samples collected prospectively across three centres in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be recruited across the following clinical streams: (1) acute leukaemia and allogeneic stem cell transplant; (2) end-stage liver disease and liver transplant; (3) patients receiving any cancer immunotherapies (eg, chimeric antigen receptor therapy); (4) deceased organ donors and (5) healthy adult controls. Participants will be asked to provide paired peripheral blood and microbiota samples (stool and saliva) at either (1) single time point for healthy controls and deceased organ donors or (2) longitudinally over multiple prespecified or event-driven time points for the remaining cohorts. Sampling of fluid from bronchoalveolar lavage and colonoscopy or biopsy of tissues undertaken during routine care will also be performed., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained from the relevant local ethics committee (The Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee). The results of this study will be disseminated by various scientific platforms including social media, international presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12623001105639. Date registered 20 October 2023., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: OS had financial support in the form of a postdoctoral scholarship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) for the submitted work (#1191571). MS is supported by NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant (#1173791). KAM is on the advisory board for and holds equity in Postbiotics Plus Research, and she also reports consulting fees from Crestone and Incyte. All authors have no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. KAM reports that she holds equity and is ok the advisory board for Postbiotics Plus, and consults for Crestone., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose of Review: Given the high mortality and morbidity associated with invasive fungal diseases (IFDs), the use of combination antifungal therapies is often considered despite the dearth of data. This review aims to summarize the current state of literature of combination antifungal therapies, discussing the potential roles of newer antifungal combinations and key considerations for their clinical use., Recent Findings: In infections other than cryptococcal meningitis or in the setting of empirical treatment for suspected azole-resistant Aspergillus infections, the utility of the combination antifungal approaches remains controversial given the paucity of well designed randomized controlled trials. Data on potential combined antifungal treatments have been primarily limited to in-vitro studies, animal models, case reports and/or observational studies. With availability of novel antifungal agents (e.g. ibrexafungerp, fosmanogepix), combination therapy to treat mould infections should be re-visited. A phase 2 clinical trial of ibrexafungerp combined with voriconazole to treat invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is on-going., Summary: There is a need to investigate the use of combination antifungal agents. This includes delineating the indication of these combined antifungal therapies and determining how to use them most appropriately in the clinical setting., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Many patients with hematological malignancy develop fever after chemotherapy/conditioning but before chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (preneutropenic fever [PNF]). The proportion of PNF with an infectious etiology is not well established., Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective observational substudy of PNF (neutrophils >0.5 cells/μL, ≥38.0°C) in adults receiving acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy, or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) conditioning enrolled in a neutropenic fever randomized controlled trial between 1 January and 31 October 2018. Eligible patients had anticipated neutropenia ≥10 days and exclusions included concurrent infection and/or neutropenia prior to chemotherapy or conditioning. PNF rates and infections encountered were described. Associations between noninfectious etiologies and fever were explored. Antimicrobial therapy prescription across preneutropenic and neutropenic periods was examined., Results: Of 62 consecutive patients included (43 allo-HCT, 19 AML), 27 had PNF (44%) and 5 (19%) had an infective cause. Among allo-HCT, PNF occurred in 14 of 17 (82%) who received thymoglobulin; only 1 of 14 (7%) had infection. During AML chemotherapy, 18 of 19 received cytarabine, of which 8 of 18 (44%) had PNF and 3 of 8 (38%) had infection. Most patients with PNF had antimicrobial therapy continued into the neutropenic period (19/27 [70%]). Those with PNF were more likely to be escalated to broader antimicrobial therapy at onset/during neutropenic fever (5/24 [21%] vs 2/30 [7%])., Conclusions: Rates of PNF were high, and documented infection low, leading to prolonged and escalating antimicrobial therapy. In the absence of infection, early cessation of empiric therapy after PNF is recommended as an important stewardship intervention., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. A. P. D. received honoraria paid to her institution from Gilead Sciences, unrelated to this manuscript. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) causes morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts (ICHs). Based on increasing recognition of the impact of IFD on human disease, a recent WHO priority list identified key areas of need., Objectives: This review examines changes in the epidemiology of IFD, in particular the emergence of antifungal-resistant pathogens and the current availability of rapid diagnostic tests and antifungal treatment options., Sources: Literature between 2000 and January 2024 regarding fungal epidemiology, diagnostic tests, antifungal resistance, emerging fungal pathogens, and novel antifungal agents in both adult and paediatric ICH were reviewed., Content: We describe the changing epidemiology and continued burden and mortality of IFD in ICH. Furthermore, we discuss the emergence of antifungal-resistant organisms driven by new immunosuppressed populations, climate change, and antifungal exposure in the individual and environment. We highlight novel antifungal agents and how they will address current unmet needs., Implications: The changing epidemiology and increased population at risk for IFD, lack of recognition or quantification of risks for IFD with new therapies, current gaps in the availability of rapid diagnostic tests, and the imminent availability of novel antifungals with distinct spectra of activity argue for improved availability of and access to rapid diagnostics, antifungal stewardship programmes, and global access to antifungal agents., (Copyright © 2024 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This case involves a 53-year-old female with concurrent acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and multiple myeloma. She underwent cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) induction chemotherapy followed by cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation, with an early AML relapse requiring azacitidine and venetoclax therapy. She achieved complete remission and incomplete count recovery. Following fludarabine, melphalan, and thymoglobulin induction chemotherapy, she underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant with failure to engraft, requiring autologous stem cell rescue, buffy coat, and granulocyte transfusions, eventually presenting with a diffuse skin rash consistent with Steven-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, persistent neutropenic fevers and positive blood cultures., (© 2024 The Authors. Transplant Infectious Disease published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Cryptococcus is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that can cause disseminated infection with predominant central nervous system involvement in patients with compromised immunity. Biologics are increasingly used in the treatment of neoplasms and autoimmune/inflammatory conditions and the prevention of transplant rejection, which may affect human defense mechanisms against cryptococcosis. In this review, we comprehensively investigate the association between cryptococcosis and various biologics, highlighting their risks of infection, clinical manifestations, and clinical outcomes. Clinicians should remain vigilant for the risk of cryptococcosis in patients receiving biologics that affect the Th1/macrophage activation pathways, such as tumor necrosis factor α antagonists, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, fingolimod, JAK/STAT inhibitors (Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription), and monoclonal antibody against CD52. Other risk factors-such as age, underlying condition, and concurrent immunosuppressants, especially corticosteroids-should also be taken into account during risk stratification., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

SUMMARYAlthough Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans are uncommon causes of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs), these infections are associated with high mortality and are costly to treat with a limited armamentarium of antifungal drugs. In light of recent advances, including in the area of new antifungals, the present review provides a timely and updated overview of these IFDs, with a focus on the taxonomy, clinical epidemiology, pathogenesis and host immune response, disease manifestations, diagnosis, antifungal susceptibility, and treatment. An expansion of hosts at risk for these difficult-to-treat infections has emerged over the last two decades given the increased use of, and broader population treated with, immunomodulatory and targeted molecular agents as well as wider adoption of antifungal prophylaxis. Clinical presentations differ not only between genera but also across the different Scedosporium species. L. prolificans is intrinsically resistant to most currently available antifungal agents, and the prognosis of immunocompromised patients with lomentosporiosis is poor. Development of, and improved access to, diagnostic modalities for early detection of these rare mold infections is paramount for timely targeted antifungal therapy and surgery if indicated. New antifungal agents (e.g., olorofim, fosmanogepix) with novel mechanisms of action and less cross-resistance to existing classes, availability of formulations for oral administration, and fewer drug-drug interactions are now in late-stage clinical trials, and soon, could extend options to treat scedosporiosis/lomentosporiosis. Much work remains to increase our understanding of these infections, especially in the pediatric setting. Knowledge gaps for future research are highlighted in the review., Competing Interests: C.F.N. has received a fellowship grant from Gilead Sciences Australia. S.C.-A.C. received untied research funding from MSD Australia and F2G outside of the submitted work. F.L. received speaker fees from Gilead, MSD, Pfizer, and F2G, and serves advisory board for F2G. S.Y.T. is supported by the University of Melbourne for her PhD and received a grant from Gilead Sciences for a project unrelated to the submitted work. S.E.K. received conference and travel funding from Pfizer, AusDiagnostics, received speaker fees from Pfizer, and serves advisory board for Gilead Sciences. D.C.M.K. received grants from F2G unrelated to the submitted work. M.H. received research funding from Gilead Sciences, Astellas, MSD, IMMY, Mundipharma, Pulmocide, Scynexis, F2G, and Pfizer—all outside of the submitted work. M.A.S. has been on data safety, adjudication or advisory committees for Gilead Sciences, F2G, Cidara, Takeda, Merck, Roche, and Pfizer; and received research funding from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and F2G unrelated to the submitted work. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Antiviral agents with activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have played a critical role in disease management; however, little is known regarding the efficacy of these medications in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised patients, particularly in the management of persistent SARS-CoV-2 positivity. This narrative review discusses the management of persistent coronavirus disease 2019 in immunocompromised hosts, with a focus on antiviral therapies. We identified 84 cases from the literature describing a variety of approaches, including prolonged antiviral therapy (n = 11), combination antivirals (n = 13), and mixed therapy with antiviral and antibody treatments (n = 60). A high proportion had an underlying haematologic malignancy (n = 67, 80%), and were in receipt of anti-CD20 agents (n = 51, 60%). Success was reported in 70 cases (83%) which varied according to the therapy type. Combination therapies with antivirals may be an effective approach for individuals with persistent SARS-CoV-2 positivity, particularly those that incorporate treatments aimed at increasing neutralizing antibody levels. Any novel approaches taken to this difficult management dilemma should be mindful of the emergence of antiviral resistance., (© 2024 The Author(s). Transplant Infectious Disease published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Investigation of infection risk with subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab and rituximab administration in an individual patient data (IPD) and published data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)., Methods: Databases were searched to September 2021. Primary outcomes were serious and high-grade infection. Relative-risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using random-effects models., Results: IPD meta-analysis (6 RCTs, 2971 participants, 2320 infections) demonstrated higher infection incidence with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration, without reaching statistical significance (serious: 12.2% versus 9.3%, RR 1.28, 95%CI 0.93to1.77, P = 0.13; high-grade: 12.2% versus 9.9%, RR 1.32, 95%CI 0.98to1.77, P = 0.07). With exclusion of an outlying study in post-hoc analysis, increased risks were statistically significant (serious: 13.1% versus 8.4%, RR 1.53, 95%CI 1.14to2.06, P = 0.01; high-grade: 13.2% versus 9.3%, RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.16to2.11, P < 0.01). Published data meta-analysis (8 RCTs, 3745 participants, 648 infections) demonstrated higher incidence of serious (HR 1.31, 95%CI 1.02to1.68, P = 0.04) and high-grade (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.17to1.98, P < 0.01) infection with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration., Conclusions: Results suggest increased infection risk with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration, although IPD findings are sensitive to exclusion of one trial with inconsistent results and identified risk-of-bias. Ongoing trials may confirm findings. Clinical surveillance should be considered when switching to subcutaneous administration. PROSPERO registration CRD42020221866/CRD42020125376., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: Critically ill patients are vulnerable to penicillin allergy labels that may be incorrect. The validity of skin testing in intensive care units (ICUs) is uncertain. Many penicillin allergy labels are low risk, and validated tools exist to identify those amenable to direct oral challenge. This pilot randomised controlled trial explored the feasibility, safety, and validity of direct enteral challenge for low-risk penicillin allergy labels in critical illness., Methods: Consenting patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy label (PAL) (PEN-FAST risk assessment score < 3) in four ICUs (Melbourne, Australia) were randomised 1:1 to penicillin (250 mg amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) direct enteral challenge versus routine care (2-h post-randomisation observation for each arm). Repeat challenge was performed post -ICU in the intervention arm. Patients were reviewed at 24 h and 5 days after each challenge/observation., Results: We screened 533 patients. 130 (24.4%) were eligible and 80/130 (61.5%) enrolled (age median 64.5 years (interquartile range, IQR 53.5, 74), PEN-FAST median 1 (IQR 0,1)), with 40 (50%) randomised to direct enteral challenge. A positive challenge rate of 2.5% was identified. No antibiotic-associated serious adverse events were identified. 32/40 (80%) received a repeat challenge (zero positive). Post-randomisation, 13 (32%) of the intervention arm and 4 (10%) of the control arm received penicillin (odds ratio, OR 4.33 [1.27, 14.78] p = 0.019)., Conclusion: These findings support the safety, validity, and feasibility of direct enteral challenge for critically ill patients with PEN-FAST assessed low-risk penicillin allergy. The absence of false negative results was confirmed by subsequent negative repeat challenges. A relatively low recruitment to screened ratio suggests that more inclusive eligibility criteria and integration of allergy assessment into routine ICU processes are needed to optimise allergy delabelling in critical illness., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Neutropenic sepsis frequently requires admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Differences between subgroups of patients with neutropenic sepsis are not well characterized., Aims: To investigate clinical outcomes among patients with neutropenic sepsis and hematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to ICU in Australia or New Zealand between January 2000 and December 2022 with a primary admission diagnosis of sepsis and total white cell count <1.0 × 10 9 cells/L., Results: We identified 8617 ICU admissions with neutropenic sepsis (hematological malignancy n = 4660; metastatic solid cancer n = 1034; no cancer n = 2800). Patients with hematological malignancy were younger (median, 61.5 years) with low rates of chronic comorbidities (4.7%) and were usually admitted to ICU from the ward (67.4%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 20.2% and in-hospital mortality was 30.6%. Patients with metastatic solid cancers were older (median, 66.3 years), with higher rates of chronic comorbidities (9.9%), and were usually admitted to the ICU from the emergency department (50.8%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 16.9% and in-hospital mortality was 42.4%. Patients with no documented cancer had highest rates of mechanical ventilation (41.7%) and mortality (46.3%). Neutropenia was independently associated with mortality among patients with solid cancers or no cancer but did not confer increased risk among patients with hematological malignancy (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, .90-1.06; P = .60)., Conclusions: Patients with neutropenic sepsis and hematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis constitute 3 distinct clinical groups. Management approaches should be tailored accordingly., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. R. W. declares research grant funding (Janssen, paid to institution); speaker fees (Janssen, Abbvie); advisory board participation (AbbVie, Beigene, Janssen); data safety monitoring boards (C-SMART DSMB NCT04534725, RATIONALISE steering committee ACTRN12622000359730). A. M. is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postgraduate scholarship (GNT2022415) and Z. M. is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leader Fellowship (GNT1194811). The authors have no competing interests to declare. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Sepsis occurs in 12-27% of patients with haematological malignancy within a year of diagnosis. Sepsis mortality has improved in non-cancer patients in the last two decades, but longitudinal trends in patients with haematological malignancy are not well characterised. We aimed to compare outcomes, including temporal changes, in patients with and without a haematological malignancy admitted to ICU with a primary diagnosis of sepsis in Australia and New Zealand over the past two decades., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 282,627 patients with a primary intensive care unit (ICU) admission diagnosis of sepsis including 17,313 patients with haematological malignancy, admitted to 216 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia or New Zealand between January 2000 and December 2022. Annual crude and adjusted in-hospital mortality were reported. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were determined using a mixed methods logistic regression model and were used to calculate annual changes in mortality., Results: In-hospital sepsis mortality decreased in patients with haematological malignancy, from 55.6% (95% CI 46.5-64.6%) in 2000 to 23.1% (95% CI 20.8-25.5%) in 2021. In patients without haematological malignancy mortality decreased from 33.1% (95% CI 31.3-35.1%) to 14.4% (95% CI 13.8-14.8%). This decrease remained significant after adjusting for mortality predictors including age, SOFA score and comorbidities, as estimated by adjusted annual odds of in-hospital death. The reduction in odds of death was of greater magnitude in patients with haematological malignancy than those without (OR 0.954, 95% CI 0.947-0.961 vs. OR 0.968, 95% CI 0.966-0.971, p < 0.001). However, absolute risk of in-hospital mortality remained higher in patients with haematological malignancy. Older age, higher SOFA score, presence of comorbidities, and mechanical ventilation were associated with increased mortality. Leukopenia (white cell count < 1.0 × 10 9  cells/L) was not associated with increased mortality in patients with haematological malignancy (p = 0.60)., Conclusions: Sepsis mortality has improved in patients with haematological malignancy admitted to ICU. However, mortality remains higher in patients with haematological malignancy than those without., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Patients with haematological malignancies might develop life-threatening toxoplasmosis, especially after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Reactivation of latent cysts is the primary mechanism of toxoplasmosis following HSCT; hence, patients at high risk are those who were seropositive before transplantation. The lack of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis and various immune status parameters of the patient are other associated risk factors. The mortality of toxoplasma disease-eg, with organ involvement-can be particularly high in this setting. We have developed guidelines for managing toxoplasmosis in haematology patients, through a literature review and consultation with experts. In allogeneic HSCT recipients seropositive for Toxoplasma gondii before transplant, because T gondii infection mostly precedes toxoplasma disease, we propose weekly blood screening by use of quantitative PCR (qPCR) to identify infection early as a pre-emptive strategy. As trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis might fail, prophylaxis and qPCR screening should be combined. However, PCR in blood can be negative even in toxoplasma disease. The duration of prophylaxis should be a least 6 months and extended during treatment-induced immunosuppression or severe CD4 lymphopenia. If a positive qPCR test occurs, treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine, or pyrimethamine-clindamycin should be started, and a new sample taken. If the second qPCR test is negative, clinical judgement is recommended to either continue or stop therapy and restart prophylaxis. Therapy must be continued until a minimum of two negative PCRs for infection, or for at least 6 weeks for disease. The pre-emptive approach is not indicated in seronegative HSCT recipients, after autologous transplantation, or in non-transplant haematology patients, but PCR should be performed with a high level of clinical suspicion., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reported outcomes in patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been variable owing to a combination of viral strain heterogeneity, differences in patient populations and health systems, and local availability of vaccination and specific COVID-19 therapies. There are few reports on the experience of Australian patients with PID during the pandemic., Objectives: In this retrospective study, we describe the baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with PID who were infected by COVID-19 and known to the Royal Melbourne Hospital, a major tertiary center in Victoria, Australia., Methods: Between April 2021 and April 2022, a total of 31 of 138 patients with PID were affected by COVID-19. More than half of them had 3 vaccine doses at the time of infection (which at the time was considered being fully vaccinated) and received COVID-19-targeted treatment., Results: All of the infected patients had ambulatory disease, with no cases of morbidity or mortality. In line with the current literature, the PID subtypes described did not appear to independently predict worse outcomes., Conclusions: Some protective factors include this cohort's relatively younger average age and its high uptake of vaccination and COVID-19 therapies., Competing Interests: Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: In the past 5 years, J. A. Douglass has received honoraria for educational presentations from Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Novartis, CSL; served on advisory boards for Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, GSK, Astra-Zeneca, Immunosis, and CSL; and undertaken contracted or investigator-initiated research on behalf of GSK, Novartis, Immunosis, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Grifols, CSL, BioCryst, and Equilium; in addition, he has a personal superannuation shareholding in CSL and received book royalties from the book Fast Facts: Asthma. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a common complication in patients receiving chemotherapy. Judicious antimicrobial use is paramount to minimize morbidity and mortality and to avoid antimicrobial-related harms., Objectives: To use an Australian national dataset of antimicrobial prescriptions for the treatment of NF to describe antimicrobial use, prescription guideline compliance and appropriateness; and to compare these findings across different healthcare settings and patient demographics. We also aimed to identify trends and practice changes over time., Methods: Data were extracted from the Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS) database from August 2013 to May 2022. Antimicrobial prescriptions with a NF indication were analysed for antimicrobial use, guideline compliance and appropriateness according to the Hospital NAPS methodology. Demographic factors, hospital classifications and disease characteristics were compared., Results: A total of 2887 (n = 2441 adults, n = 441 paediatric) NF prescriptions from 254 health facilities were included. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most prescribed antimicrobial. Overall, 87.4% of prescriptions were appropriate. Piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime had the highest appropriateness though incorrect piperacillin-tazobactam dosing was observed. Lower appropriateness was identified for meropenem, vancomycin, and gentamicin prescribing particularly in the private hospital and paediatric cohorts. The most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were spectrum too broad, incorrect dosing or frequency, and incorrect duration., Conclusions: This study provides insights into antimicrobial prescribing practices for NF in Australia. We have identified three key areas for improvement: piperacillin-tazobactam dosing, paediatric NF prescribing and private hospital NF prescribing. Findings from this study will inform the updated Australian and New Zealand consensus guidelines for the management of neutropenic fever in patients with cancer., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Competing Interests: APD has received honoraria paid to her institution from Gilead Sciences. MAS has received grants to her institution from F2G and Merck, honoraria paid to her institution by Shionogi, and participated on the data safety monitoring board of trials by Roche and Pfizer.

Background: Little is known about the short- and long-term healthcare costs of invasive Scedosporium/Lomentospora prolificans infections, particularly in patient groups without haematological malignancy. This study investigated excess index hospitalization costs and cumulative costs of these infections. The predictors of excess cost and length of stay (LOS) of index hospitalization were determined. These estimates serve as valuable inputs for cost-effectiveness models of novel antifungal agents., Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at six Australian hospitals. Cases of proven/probable invasive Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections between 2011 and 2021 (n = 34) were matched with controls (n = 66) by predefined criteria. Cost data were retrieved from activity-based costing systems and analysis was performed from the Australian public hospital perspective. All costs were presented in 2022 Australian dollars (AUD). Median regression analysis was used to adjust excess costs of index hospitalization whereas cumulative costs up to 1.5 years follow-up were estimated using interval-partitioned survival probabilities., Results: Invasive Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections were independently associated with an adjusted median excess cost of AUD36 422 (P = 0.003) and LOS of 16.27 days (P < 0.001) during index hospitalization. Inpatient stay was the major cost driver (42.7%), followed by pharmacy cost, of which antifungal agents comprised 23.8% of the total cost. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant increased the excess cost (P = 0.013) and prolonged LOS (P < 0.001) whereas inpatient death within ≤28 days reduced both cost (P = 0.001) and LOS (P < 0.001). The median cumulative cost increased substantially to AUD203 292 over 1.5 years in cases with Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections., Conclusions: The economic burden associated with invasive Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections is substantial., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Patients can be immunocompromised from a diverse range of disease and treatment factors, including malignancies, autoimmune disorders and their treatments, and organ and stem-cell transplantation. Infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, and the disease treatment landscape is continually evolving. Despite being a critical but preventable and curable adverse event, the reporting of infection events in randomised trials lacks sufficient detail while inconsistency of categorisation and definition of infections in observational and registry studies limits comparability and future pooling of data. A core reporting dataset consisting of category, site, severity, organism, and endpoints was developed as a minimum standard for reporting of infection events in immunocompromised patients across study types. Further additional information is recommended depending on study type. The standardised reporting of infectious events and attributable complications in immunocompromised patients will improve diagnostic, treatment, and prevention approaches and facilitate future research in this patient group., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests BWT has received grants from Seqirus and MSD, and has been on the advisory board for Takeda, CSL-Behring, and Moderna. RdlC has consulted for Moderna and AstraZeneca, and received honoraria from MSD, Shionogi, Astellas, Moderna, Atara, Pfizer, and Gilead. HHH has consulted for Molecular Partners, Roche, and Vero Tx, and received honoraria from Gilead, MSD, and Vero Tx. LO-Z has received grants from Scynexis, Pulmocide, Gilead, Astellas, Pfizer, T2, and the National Institutes of Health, and has consulted for F2G, GSK, Melinta, Pfizer, Viracor, Cidara, and Gilead. BHT is on the advisory board for Pfizer and MSD. RMLH is on the advisory board for Takeda. PAG has consulted for MSD, Allovir, and Takeda; received honoraria from MSD, Atara, Takeda, and Gilead; and is on the data safety and monitoring and advisory boards for Reithera. NJM has received a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation and meeting support from Bio Test and Pfizer. MAS has received grants from Gilead, MSD, and F2G. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: A recent randomised trial demonstrated [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in combination with low-dose CT (FDG-PET/CT), compared to standard of care computed tomography (CT) imaging, positively impacted antimicrobial management and outcomes of acute leukaemia and haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with persistent and recurrent neutropenic fever. We conducted an economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective alongside the clinical trial., Methods: Unit costs in Australian dollars were applied to all resources used (antimicrobials, diagnostic tests, ICU and hospital bed days). Effectiveness was measured as number of patients with antimicrobial rationalisation, 6-month mortality and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from patient-reported trial-based health-related quality-of-life. Generalised linear models were used to analyse costs and outcomes. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for all outcomes and net monetary benefit (NMB) for QALYs were calculated. We performed bootstrapping with 1000 replications using the recycled predictions method., Results: The adjusted healthcare costs were lower for FDG-PET/CT (mean $49,563; 95%CI 36,867, 65,133) compared to CT (mean $57,574; 95% CI 44,837, 73,347). The difference in QALYs between the two groups was small (0.001; 95% CI -0.001, 0.004). When simulated 1000 times, FDG-PET/CT was the dominant strategy as it was cheaper with better outcomes than the standard CT group in 74% of simulations. The estimated NMBs at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY were positive, thus FDG-PET/CT remained cost-effective at these thresholds., Conclusions: FDG-PET/CT is cost effective when compared to CT for investigation of persistent/recurrent neutropenic fever in high-risk patients, providing further support for incorporation of FDG-PET/CT into clinical guidelines and funding., Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03429387., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

T/Natural killer (NK) cell lymphomas (TCL) represent a heterogenous subgroup of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, associated with poorer prognosis and higher treatment toxicity. A cohesive synthesis of infection outcomes among TCL patients is lacking. International guidelines offer no specific recommendations regarding prophylaxis or supportive infection care for TCL patients. This systematic narrative review highlights infection outcomes in TCL patients treated with conventional, and novel therapies. Recommendations for infection screening, antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination strategies are outined.

A registered (PROSPERO - CRD42022346462) systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of all-grade infections amongst adult patients receiving CAR-T therapy for haematological malignancy. Meta-analysis of pooled incidence, using random effects model, was conducted. Cochran's Q test examined heterogeneity. 2678 patients across 33 studies were included in the primary outcome. Forty-percent of patients (95% CI: 0.33 - 0.48) experienced an infection of any grade. Twenty-five percent of infection events (95% CI: 0.16 - 0.34) were severe. Late infections were as common as early infections (IRR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.38 - 1.98). All-grade infections, bacterial and viral infections were highest in myeloma patients at 57%, 37% and 28% respectively. Patients with NHL more commonly experienced late infections. Pooled rate of invasive candidiasis/yeast infections was 2% in studies utilizing anti-yeast prophylaxis. This review identified a high rate of all-grade infections, moderate rate of severe infections, and myeloma as a high-risk haematological group., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In-depth immunogenicity studies of tixagevimab-cilgavimab (T-C) are lacking, including following breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in vaccinated patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) receiving T-C as pre-exposure prophylaxis., Methods: We performed a prospective, observational cohort study and detailed immunological analyses of 93 patients with HM who received T-C from May 2022, with and without breakthrough infection, during a follow-up period of 6 months and dominant Omicron BA.5 variant., Results: In 93 patients who received T-C, there was an increase in Omicron BA.4/5 receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titers that persisted for 6 months and was equivalent to 3-dose-vaccinated uninfected healthy controls at 1 month postinjection. Omicron BA.4/5 neutralizing antibody was lower in patients receiving B-cell-depleting therapy within 12 months despite receipt of T-C. COVID-19 vaccination during T-C treatment did not incrementally improve RBD or neutralizing antibody levels. In 16 patients with predominantly mild breakthrough infection, no change in serum neutralization of Omicron BA.4/5 postinfection was detected. Activation-induced marker assay revealed an increase in CD4 + (but not CD8 + ) T cells post infection, comparable to previously infected healthy controls., Conclusions: Our study provides proof-of-principle for a pre-exposure prophylaxis strategy and highlights the importance of humoral and cellular immunity post-breakthrough COVID-19 in vaccinated patients with HM., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. B. W. T. has been on the advisory board for Moderna, Takeda, and CSL-Behring; has received research funding from MSD and Seqirus; and has received honoraria from Pfizer, Alexion, and Janssen that were paid to his institution. M. A. S. has served on data safety monitoring and adjudication committees or advisory committees for Gilead Sciences, F2G, Cidara, Takeda, Merck, Roche, and Pfizer, and has received research funding from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and F2G. J. F. S. has served on the advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Gilead, Roche, and Janssen; served on a scientific advisory board for Genor Biopharma; has received research funding from AbbVie, BMS, and Roche; has served on speakers’ bureaus for AbbVie, BMS, and Roche; and is a consultant and has given expert testimony to TG Therapeutics. T. S. has received compensation for serving on scientific advisory boards, honoraria for consultancy, and funding for travel from Biogen. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

In recent years, advancements in the treatment landscape for hematological malignancies, such as acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, have significantly improved disease prognosis and overall survival. However, the treatment landscape is changing and the emergence of targeted oral therapies and immune-based treatments has brought forth new challenges in evaluating and preventing invasive fungal diseases (IFDs). IFD disproportionately affects immunocompromised hosts, particularly those undergoing therapy for acute leukemia and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pretransplant workup, identification, and prevention of IFD in patients with hematological malignancy. The pretransplant period offers a critical window to assess each patient's risk factors and implement appropriate prophylactic measures. Risk assessment includes evaluation of disease, host, prior treatments, and environmental factors, allowing a dynamic evaluation that considers disease progression and treatment course. Diagnostic screening, involving various biomarkers and radiological modalities, plays a crucial role in early detection of IFD. Antifungal prophylaxis choice is based on available evidence as well as individual risk assessment, potential for drug-drug interactions, toxicity, and patient adherence. Therapeutic drug monitoring ensures effective antifungal stewardship and optimal treatment. Patient education and counselling are vital in minimizing environmental exposures to fungal pathogens and promoting medication adherence. A well-structured and individualized approach, encompassing risk assessment, prophylaxis, surveillance, and patient education, is essential for effectively preventing IFD in hematological malignancies, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and overall survival., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer generally requires in-hospital care, but low-risk patients may be successfully managed in an outpatient setting, potentially reducing the overall healthcare costs. Updated data on the costs of FN care are lacking., Methods: A bottom-up microcosting analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective using data collected alongside the Australian PICNICC (Predicting Infectious Complications of Neutropenic sepsis In Children with Cancer) study. Inpatient costs were accessed from hospital administrative records and outpatient costs from Medicare data. Costs were stratified by risk status (low/high risk) according to the PICNICC criteria. Estimated mean costs were obtained through bootstrapping and using a linear model to account for multiple events across individuals and other clinical factors that may impact costs., Results: The total costs of FN care were significantly higher for FN events classified as high-risk ($17,827, 95% confidence interval [CI]: $17,193-$18,461) compared to low-risk ($10,574, 95% CI: $9818-$11,330). In-hospital costs were significantly higher for high-risk compared to low-risk events, despite no differences in the cost structure, mean cost per day, and pattern of resource use. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was the only modifiable factor significantly associated with total costs of care. Excluding antineoplastics, antimicrobials are the most commonly used medications in the inpatient and outpatient setting for the overall period of analysis., Conclusion: The FN costs are driven by in-hospital admission and LOS. This suggests that the outpatient management of low-risk patients is likely to reduce the in-hospital cost of treating an FN event. Further research will determine if shifting the cost to the outpatient setting remains cost-effective overall., (© 2023 The Authors. Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The preferred strategy for preventing CMV in at-risk populations in alloHCT has undergone a significant practice shift in recent years where the pendulum has swung from a pre-emptive approach to now offering letermovir prophylaxis to all CMV seropositive recipients. Letermovir prophylaxis has resulted in significant reductions in post-transplant clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) as well as other important outcomes such as CMV disease, resistant, and refractory CMV infections and nonrelapse mortality. However, prophylactic strategies are not without some limitations, namely delayed onset CMV infections, delayed CMV-specific T cell immune reconstitution, increased drug costs and limited data within pediatric populations. Thus, this review aims to provide an overview of prophylaxis and pre-emptive CMV preventative strategies, and how they are applicable in the current era of letermovir prophylaxis., (© 2023 The Authors. Transplant Infectious Disease published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

In patients early post-autologous stem cell transplant, seroprotection rates were high for Hemophilus influenzae type B and tetanus toxoid (70%-90%) but lower for Streptococcus pneumoniae (30%-50%) including after revaccination. There were high rates of seropositivity (67%-86%) to measles, mumps, and rubella and varicella zoster virus. Durability of protection requires assessment., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. V.G.H. is supported by an NHMRC postgraduate PhD scholarship (#2014210). M.Y. has received honoraria from MSD and Takeda. M.A.S. has been on data safety monitoring and adjudication committees for Cidara, Roche, and Pfizer. She has received research funding from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and F2G and sat on advisory boards for Gilead Sciences, F2G, Cidara, Takeda, and Merck. M.A.S. is supported by Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator (#1173791) and Synergy Grants (#2011100). B.W.T. has been on advisory boards for Moderna, Takeda, and CSL-Behring and received research funding from MSD and Seqirus. B.W.T. has received honoraria paid to the institution from Pfizer, Alexion, and Janssen. B.W.T. is supported by the Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund Investigator Fellowship (EL-2, #1195894). All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are increasingly recognized as being at risk for cryptococcosis. Knowledge of characteristics of cryptococcosis in these patients remains incomplete., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of cryptococcosis in 46 Australian and New Zealand hospitals to compare its frequency in patients with and without HIV and describe its characteristics in patients without HIV. Patients with cryptococcosis between January 2015 and December 2019 were included., Results: Of 475 patients with cryptococcosis, 90% were without HIV (426 of 475) with marked predominance in both Cryptococcus neoformans (88.7%) and Cryptococcus gattii cases (94.3%). Most patients without HIV (60.8%) had a known immunocompromising condition: cancer (n = 91), organ transplantation (n = 81), or other immunocompromising condition (n = 97). Cryptococcosis presented as incidental imaging findings in 16.4% of patients (70 of 426). The serum cryptococcal antigen test was positive in 85.1% of tested patients (319 of 375); high titers independently predicted risk of central nervous system involvement. Lumbar puncture was performed in 167 patients to screen for asymptomatic meningitis, with a positivity rate of 13.2% where meningitis could have been predicted by a high serum cryptococcal antigen titer and/or fungemia in 95% of evaluable cases. One-year all-cause mortality was 20.9% in patients without HIV and 21.7% in patients with HIV (P = .89)., Conclusions: Ninety percent of cryptococcosis cases occurred in patients without HIV (89% and 94% for C. neoformans and C. gattii, respectively). Emerging patient risk groups were evident. A high level of awareness is warranted to diagnose cryptococcosis in patients without HIV., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . T. S. has received consulting fees for serving on advisory boards and steering committees from Biogen. O. M. has received grants from Gilead Sciences and Merck, Sharp and Dohme Australia and honoraria from Gilead Sciences; support for attending meetings from F2G; and participated on data and safety monitoring boards (DSMB) or advisory boards for Gilead Sciences and Merck, Sharp and Dohme Australia. K. J. K. has received payment for expert testimony at the 46th Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia National Conference. A. R. T. has received honoraria from the Medical Journal of Australia, paid to institution, and reports grants or contracts from CTRA with the University of Melbourne (reimbursement of costs paid to institution). B. W. T. is supported by a Medical Research Future Fund Investigator Fellowship; has received grants from MSD and Seqirus; has received honoraria from Pfizer, Alexion, and Janssen; and participated on DSMBs or advisory boards for CSL­Behring, Takeda, and Moderna. S. C. A. C. has received educational grants from F2G and MSD Australia; reports untied educational grants from MSD Australia and F2G Pty Ltd; and reports a role as editor-in-chief for Medical Mycology (journal of ISHAM). M. A. S. has received grants from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and F2G; has received honoraria from F2G; and participated on DSMBs or advisory boards for Pfizer, Cidara, and Roche. R. J. L. reports paid participation on a GSK advisory board. S. A. L. reports grants or contracts as principal investigator on 3 projects funded through a Hot North fund grant and a UK Government Fleming Fund Grant (as part of broader funding for the Menzies School of Health Research; no salary, project costs remunerated only); unpaid participation on a DSMB or advisory board for the Australian Academy of Science and the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences roundtable of experts for the House of Representatives Committee on Health and Ageing; and an unpaid role as a National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee member. M. T. B. reports an unpaid role as an Advanced Training Committee member for General Medicine for the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and an unpaid member of the Vocational Training Committee for Medical Registrars in the Auckland region for the Northern Region Alliance. C. L. K. reports an unpaid role on the Australian Society of Infectious Diseases Board of Directors. E. W. reports a role as a committee member of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Equity and Diversity Committee (unpaid). K. C. G. reports a role as a member of the New Zealand Committee of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) are increasingly used to treat haematological malignancies. Strategies for preventing infections in CAR-T-treated patients rely on expert opinions and consensus guidelines., Objectives: This scoping review aimed to identify risk factors for infections in CAR-T-treated patients with haematological malignancies., Data Sources: A literature search utilized MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until 30 September 2022., Study Eligibility Criteria: Trials and observational studies were eligible., Participants: Studies required ≥10 patients treated for haematological malignancy to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either (a) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk factors for infections, or (b) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T-treated patients with infection., Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines., Data Sources: A literature search utilised MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until September 30, 2022. Eligibility/Participants/Intervention: Trials and observational studies were eligible. Studies required ≥ 10 patients treated for haematological malignancy, to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either A) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk-factors for infections, or B) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T treated patients with infection., Assessment of Risk of Bias: Bias assessment was undertaken according to Joanna Brigg's Institute criteria for observational studies., Methods of Data Synthesis: Data were synthesized descriptively because of the heterogeneity of reporting., Results: A total of 1522 patients across 15 studies were identified. All-cause infections across haematological malignancies were associated with lines of prior therapy, steroid administration, immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity and treatment-emergent neutropenia. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and cytokine profiles did not reliably predict infections. Predictors of viral, bacterial and fungal infections were poorly canvassed., Discussion: Meta-analysis of the current literature is not possible because of significant heterogeneity in definitions of infections and risk factors, and small, underpowered cohort studies. Radical revision of how we approach reporting infections for novel therapies is required to promptly identify infection signals and associated risks in patients receiving novel therapies. Prior therapies, neutropenia, steroid administration and immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity remain the most associated with infections in CAR-T-treated patients., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality for immunocompromised children, particularly for patients with acute leukaemia and those undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Timely diagnosis, using a combination of computed tomography (CT) imaging and microbiological testing, is key to improve prognosis, yet there are inherent challenges in this process. For CT imaging, changes in children are generally less specific than those reported in adults and recent data are limited. Respiratory sampling by either bronchoalveolar lavage or lung biopsy is recommended but is not always feasible in children, and serum biomarkers, including galactomannan, have important limitations. In this review we summarise the current paediatric data on available diagnostic tests for IPA and highlight key emerging diagnostic modalities with potential for future use., (© 2023. Crown.)

Background: New and emerging risks for invasive aspergillosis (IA) bring the need for contemporary analyses of the epidemiology and outcomes of IA, in order to improve clinical practice., Methods: The study was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort design of proven and probable IA in adults from 10 Australasian tertiary centres (January 2017-December 2020). Descriptive analyses were used to report patients' demographics, predisposing factors, mycological characteristics, diagnosis and management. Accelerated failure-time model was employed to determine factor(s) associated with 90-day all-cause mortality (ACM)., Findings: Of 382 IA episodes, 221 (in 221 patients) fulfilled inclusion criteria - 53 proven and 168 probable IA. Median patient age was 61 years (IQR 51-69). Patients with haematologic malignancies (HM) comprised 49.8% of cases. Fifteen patients (6.8%) had no pre-specified immunosuppression and eleven patients (5.0%) had no documented comorbidity. Only 30% of patients had neutropenia. Of 170 isolates identified, 40 (23.5%) were identified as non- Aspergillus fumigatus species complex. Azole-resistance was present in 3/46 (6.5%) of A. fumigatus sensu stricto isolates. Ninety-day ACM was 30.3%. HM (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.04-3.46, p = 0.036) and ICU admission (HR 4.89; 95% CI 2.93-8.17, p < 0.001) but not neutropenia (HR 1.45; 95% CI 0.88-2.39, p = 0.135) were associated with mortality. Chronic kidney disease was also a significant predictor of death in the HM subgroup (HR 3.94; 95% CI 1.15-13.44, p = 0.028)., Interpretation: IA is identified in high number of patients with mild/no immunosuppression in our study. The relatively high proportion of non- A. fumigatus species complex isolates and 6.5% azole-resistance rate amongst A. fumigatus sensu stricto necessitates accurate species identification and susceptibility testing for optimal patient outcomes., Funding: This work is unfunded. All authors' financial disclosures are listed in detail at the end of the manuscript., Competing Interests: This work itself is not funded. All authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this publication, or any financial support that could have influenced its outcome., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Infection remains a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients with myeloma. This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary group of clinicians who specialise in the management of patients with myeloma and infection from the medical and scientific advisory group from Myeloma Australia and the National Centre for Infections in Cancer. In addition to summarising the current epidemiology and risk factors for infection in patients with myeloma, this guideline provides recommendations that address three key areas in the prevention of infection: screening for latent infection, use of antimicrobial prophylaxis and immunoglobulin replacement and vaccination against leading respiratory infections (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, influenza and Streptococcus pneumoniae) and other preventable infections. This guideline provides a practical approach to the prevention of infection in patients with myeloma and harmonises the clinical approach to screening for infection, use of prophylaxis and vaccination to prevent infectious complications., (© 2023 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease impacts morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. This systematic review summarized data on the epidemiology, management, and burden of CMV post-HCT outside of Europe and North America., Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies and treatment guidelines in HCT recipients across 15 selected countries from Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East (search period: 1 January 2011-17 September 2021). Outcomes included incidence of CMV infection/disease, recurrence, risk factors, CMV-related mortality, treatments, refractory, resistant CMV, and burden., Results: Of 2708 references identified, 68 were eligible (67 studies and one guideline; 45/67 studies specific to adult allogeneic HCT recipients). The rates of CMV infection and disease within 1 year of allogeneic HCT were 24.9%-61.2% (23 studies) and 2.9%-15.7% (10 studies), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 19.8%-37.9% of cases (11 studies). Up to 10% of HCT recipients died of CMV-related causes. In all countries, first-line treatment for CMV infection/disease involved intravenous ganciclovir or valganciclovir. Conventional treatments were associated with serious adverse events such as myelosuppression (10.0%) or neutropenia only (30.0%, 39.8%) and nephrotoxicity (11.0%) (three studies), frequently leading to treatment discontinuation (up to 13.6%). Refractory CMV was reported in 2.9%, 13.0%, and 28.9% of treated patients (three studies) with resistant CMV diagnosed in 0%-10% of recipients (five studies). Patient-reported outcomes and economic data were scarce., Conclusion: The incidence of CMV infection and disease post-HCT is high outside of North America and Europe. CMV resistance and toxicity highlight a major unmet need with current conventional treatments., (© 2023 The Authors. Transplant Infectious Disease published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: To understand the drivers and barriers for COVID-19 vaccination in people with cancer in Australia., Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey, distributed nationally following the establishment of community vaccination programs, wider availability of COVID-19 vaccines and emergence of new variants. Consisting of 21 questions, the survey was designed to determine the behavioural and social drivers of vaccination, participant demographics, underlying disease and treatment, and vaccination status. It was open from the 10th of August 2021 to the 7th of September 2021, recruiting people who had a previous history of cancer (diagnosed or treated in the past 5 years)., Results: A total of 1506 responses were included in the final analysis. Overall, 87.8% reported a positive attitude toward vaccination and 83.1% had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Perceived risk of COVID-19 infection (for self and others) and engagement with a trusted health professional were key drivers for vaccination, while concerns about vaccine development, safety and side effects were barriers. Concerns about vaccination mostly stemmed from a place of misinformation, rather than a broader disregard of vaccines. Just over a third (497, 34.3%) of the respondents were concerned that the vaccine would impact their cancer treatment., Conclusion: Overall, participants had positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and thought it was safe. Findings supported the role of health professionals and cancer organisations as trusted information providers and calls for more, credible information to help people with cancer make informed decisions about the COVID-19 vaccine., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical stability and reliability of penicillin skin testing. Allergy assessment tools exist to identify low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes and facilitate direct oral challenge delabelling. PEN-FAST is a clinical decision rule that has been validated to predict true penicillin allergy in a cohort of non-critically ill patients. There is however limited evidence regarding the feasibility, safety and efficacy of direct oral challenges and the use of delabelling clinical decisions rules in the intensive care setting., Methods: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes (PEN-FAST score < 3) will be randomised 1:1 to direct oral penicillin challenge (single dose 250 mg oral amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) or routine care, followed by a 2-h observation period. Patients will receive a second oral challenge/observation prior to hospital discharge (with subsequent observation for 2 h). An assessment for antibiotic-associated adverse events will also be undertaken at 24 h and 5 days post each challenge/observation and again at 90 days post-randomisation. The primary outcome measures are feasibility (proportion of eligible patients recruited and protocol compliance) and safety (proportion of patients who experience an antibiotic-associated immune-mediated adverse event or serious adverse event)., Discussion: We will report the feasibility and safety of point-of-care penicillin direct oral challenge in this first randomised controlled trial of low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospitalised patients. Upon completion of the project, important findings will inform the design of planned large prospective multi-centre clinical trials in Australian and international ICUs, further examining safety and efficacy and exploring antimicrobial prescribing-related outcomes following penicillin oral challenge., Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ACTRN12621000051842 Date registered: 20/01/2021 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379735&isReview=true., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. M. A. S. reports grants or contracts from F2G (paid to institution), Gilead Sciences (paid to institution), and Merck (paid to institution); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F2G (paid to institution), participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche (paid to institution), Takeda (paid to institution), Cidara (paid to institution), and Pfizer (paid to institution). All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.