15 results on '"S. Prapa"'
Search Results
2. Validation of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitor InBody BPBIO750 for public spaces according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.
- Author
-
Ntineri A, Prapa S, Bountzona I, Menti A, and Stergiou GS
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Standards, Systole, Blood Pressure Monitors, Hypertension diagnosis
- Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the single upper-arm cuff oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor InBody BPBIO750 developed for self-measurement by adults in public spaces (kiosk) according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018)., Methods: Subjects were recruited to fulfil the age, gender, BP and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard in general population using the same arm sequential BP measurement method., Results: A total of 102 subjects were recruited and 85 were analyzed [mean age 56.7 ± 15.4 (SD) years, 40 men, arm circumference 32.3 ± 5.3 cm, range 22-42 cm]. For validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference BP readings was 2.2 ± 6.1/-2.2 ± 5.2 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). For criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences between the test device and reference BP per subject was 5.00/4.63 mmHg (systolic/diastolic)., Conclusion: The InBody BPBIO750 device fulfilled all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in general population and can be recommended for clinical use in adults., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Propranolol and oxytocin versus oxytocin alone for induction and augmentation of labor: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
- Author
-
Pergialiotis V, Frountzas M, Prodromidou A, Prapa S, Perrea DN, and Vlachos GD
- Subjects
- Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Oxytocics adverse effects, Oxytocin adverse effects, Pregnancy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Labor, Obstetric drug effects, Obstetric Labor Complications drug therapy, Oxytocics administration & dosage, Oxytocin administration & dosage, Propranolol administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: We sought to study the effect of propranolol co-administration with oxytocin during the latent and active phases of labor on labor outcomes., Materials and Methods: We searched Medline, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register databases. The meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan 5.1 software. Six studies were included in the present meta-analysis which enrolled 609 parturient., Results: According to the findings of our study, propranolol administration during the latent phase effectively reduces the cesarean section rates (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.27, 0.89). However, this beneficial effect is not observed during the active phase of labor. The 5 min neonatal Apgar scores are not influenced by its administration (MD -0.07, 95 % CI -0.017, 0.02). Respectively, the neonatal admissions to a NICU are similar to those of neonates exposed only to oxytocin (OR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.36, 2.53)., Conclusion: Propranolol's effect on the duration of the various stages of labor was underreported, however, evidence seem to support that it shortens the latent phase and possibly the total duration of labor. Firm results are, however, precluded due to the low number enrolled parturient and due to the significant methodological heterogeneity of included studies.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii and Rubella Vertical Transmission Rates According to Mid-trimester Amniocentesis: A Retrospective Study.
- Author
-
Margioula-Siarkou C, Kalogiannidis I, Petousis S, Prapa S, Dagklis T, Mamopoulos A, Prapas N, and Rousso D
- Abstract
Objective: To examine vertical transmission rates of Cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma Gondii and Rubella infections according to amniotic fluid PCR analysis., Methods: A retrospective analysis of mid-trimester amniocenteses performed in in pregnancies with diagnosed maternal infection by Cytomegavirus (CMV), Rubella or Toxoplasma gondii during 1994-2008 was performed. Vertical transmission rates were observed according to the presence of the infectious agent's DNA in the amniotic fluid. A univariate regression model was also performed to investigate possible correlations between transmission and epidemiological parameters., Results: Overall, 7033 amniocenteses were performed during study's period, of which 166 (2.4%) with the indication of maternal infection by CMV, Rubella or Toxoplasma. Mean maternal age was 27.4 ± 2.5 years and the mean gestational age at amniocentesis was 18.7 ± 2.5 weeks. Vertical transmission was observed in 21 cases (12.7%). Transmission rate was 17.3% in cases with infection from CMV, 9.5% from Toxoplasma gondii and 7.8% from Rubella (P = .05). Maternal age was the only parameter being significantly associated with increased risk for vertical transmission (P = .04)., Conclusions: According to our results, overall vertical transmission rate marginally exceeds 10%. CMV infection is characterized by relatively higher transplacental transmission rate, while increased maternal age appears to be associated with a higher risk for vertical transmission.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes in diamniotic twins: is there a difference compared to singleton pregnancies?
- Author
-
Kalogiannidis I, Petousis S, Prapa S, Dagklis T, Karkanaki A, Prapas Y, and Prapas N
- Subjects
- Abortion, Spontaneous epidemiology, Adolescent, Adult, Amniocentesis methods, Amniotic Fluid, Female, Greece epidemiology, Hemorrhage epidemiology, Humans, Incidence, Middle Aged, Oligohydramnios epidemiology, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Prenatal Diagnosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Amniocentesis adverse effects, Twins
- Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether diamniotic twin gestations are at increased risk of amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes compared to singleton pregnancies., Study Design: This was a retrospective study of mid-trimester amniocenteses performed during the period 1993-2009. Cases were divided in two groups, one including singleton (Group 1) and the other diamniotic twin pregnancies (Group 2). All amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes were reviewed, including aspiration of insufficient amniotic fluid, aspiration of hemorrhagic amniotic fluid, repeated puncture and miscarriage. The incidence of these adverse outcomes was compared between the two groups., Results: In total, 6270 cases were included in the study (Group 1, n=6150 and Group 2, n=120). Advanced maternal age was the main indication for amniocentesis in both singleton and twin pregnancies. There was no difference in the incidence of insufficient sample aspiration (0.2% in singletons vs. 0.0% in twins, P=NS), in the incidence of blood-stained amniotic fluid (3.7% in singletons vs. 4.6% in twins, P=NS), in the rate of need for second attempt (2.1% in singletons vs. 1.7% in twins, P=NS) or in the miscarriage rate (0.24% in singletons vs. 0% in twins)., Conclusion: In our experience, the incidence of amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes is not increased in diamniotic twins compared to singleton pregnancies., (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.)
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes according to placental location and risk factors for fetal loss after midtrimester amniocentesis.
- Author
-
Kalogiannidis I, Prapa S, Dagklis T, Karkanaki A, Petousis S, Prapas Y, and Prapas N
- Subjects
- Adult, Amniotic Fluid, Female, Hemorrhage etiology, Humans, Maternal Age, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Amniocentesis adverse effects, Fetal Death, Placenta diagnostic imaging, Pregnancy Trimester, Second
- Abstract
Purpose of Investigation: Amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies and possible risk factors for fetal loss after mid-trimester amniocentesis performed in a single institution were investigated., Methods: Amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes such as insufficient aspiration of amniotic fluid (AF), repeated puncture, and aspiration of hemorrhagic AF after mid-trimester amniocentesis were reviewed, while special consideration was given according to the placental location. Fetal loss rate up to 24 weeks of gestation and risk factors related to fetal losses were also investigated., Results: 5,948 cases with the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Advanced maternal age was the most common indication (53%) for amniocentesis. A need for repeated puncture was overall 2.1% (n = 128) and was associated with a fundal placental location. Aspiration of hemorrhagic amniotic fluid was observed in 3.7% (n = 222) and was significantly associated with an anterior or fundal placental position. Fetal loss rate was 0.3% and there was no relationship with advanced maternal age (> or = 35 years), gestational age at amniocentesis > 18 weeks, repeated procedure, aspiration of hemorrhagic AF or placental location., Conclusion: Anterior or fundal placental position is a risk factor for amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes, however without significant contribution to the fetal losses. Placental location, advanced maternal age, amniocentesis gestational age > 18 weeks, and the procedure's adverse outcomes seem to have no impact on fetal loss rate.
- Published
- 2011
7. Double GnRH-antagonist dose before HCG administration may prevent OHSS in oocyte-donor cycles: a pilot study.
- Author
-
Prapas Y, Panagiotidis I, Kalogiannidis I, Gjata E, Papatheodorou A, Prapa S, Kasapi L, Goudakou M, and Prapas N
- Subjects
- Adult, Estradiol blood, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Pilot Projects, Chorionic Gonadotropin administration & dosage, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone antagonists & inhibitors, Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome prevention & control, Tissue Donors
- Abstract
This pilot study evaluated the possibility of preventing early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by increasing the daily dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration (to twice a day) in oocyte-donor cycles stimulated with the antagonist protocol. The study included 72 oocyte donors who underwent ovarian stimulation using the GnRH antagonist protocol and might have had their cycle cancelled because of ovarian hyper-response. All women were donors presenting a rapid rise of oestradiol > or = 3000 pg/ml early in the stimulation period with more than 15 follicles of < or = 15 mm in diameter. By decreasing the rFSH dose to 75 IU a day with an additional daily dose of GnRH antagonist (0.25 mg twice a day), the oestradiol concentrations were lowered or reached a plateau before human chorionic gonadotrophin was given. A marked decrease in oestradiol concentrations and ovarian volume was observed on the day of oocyte retrieval and 3 days post retrieval. None of the donors needed coasting, were cancelled or developed OHSS. In over-responding oocyte donors, by increasing the usual GnRH-antagonist dose to twice a day during ovarian stimulation, the oestradiol rise can be blocked while a minimal follicular stimulation may continue without the risk of developing OHSS or affecting the outcome., (2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Poster presentations.
- Author
-
Aksu F, Topacoglu H, Arman C, Atac A, Tetik S, Hasanovic A, Kulenovic A, Mornjakovic Z, Pikula B, Sarac-Hadzihalilovic A, Voljevica A, Bamac B, Colak T, Alemdar M, Dundar G, Selekler M, Dincer O, Colak E, Ozbek A, Kilic C, Kamburoglu K, Ozen T, Kavak V, Kirici Y, Oztas E, Soysal HA, Unur E, Ekinci N, Karaca O, Malakhova O, Kocaoglu M, Toker S, Taser F, Kilincoglu V, Yurtgun MF, Dalcik C, Zeybek A, Baroncini M, Peltier J, Jissendi P, Pruvo JP, Francke JP, Prevot V, Kosif R, Arifoglu Y, Diramali M, Sarsilmaz M, Kose E, Ogeturk M, Akpinar B, Kus I, Meydan S, Kara A, Kurtoglu Z, Tekdemir I, Elhan A, Bas O, Odaci E, Mollaoglu H, Ucok K, Kaplan S, Senoglu M, Nacitarhan V, Kurutas EB, Senoglu N, Altun I, Atli Y, Ozbag D, Karakas S, Bilgin MD, Tellioglu AM, Ozlem S, Akcanal B, Yildiz Y, Gunes H, Kose H, Uzum I, Gundogmus UN, Caglayan C, Pavlova V, Dimitrova M, Georgieva L, Nikolova E, Uzmansel D, Ozturk NC, Saylam CY, Ozgiray E, Orhan M, Cagli S, Zileli M, Ozkan D, Akkaya T, Comert A, Balikci N, Ozdemir E, Gumus H, Ergul Z, Kaya O, Altun S, Unlu RE, Orbay H, Kim DI, Han SH, Kim YS, Kim HJ, Lee KS, Elcioglu O, Ozden H, Guven G, Imre N, Yalcin B, Ozan H, Akyer P, Guvencer M, Karatosun V, Sagoo MG, Aland RC, Ustuner D, Ustuner MC, Ai J, Ghazi SR, Mansouri SH, Tuncer MC, Aluclu MU, Karabulut O, Hatipoglu ES, Nazaroglu H, Icke C, Akbay E, Gunay T, Icke S, Yildiz S, Yazar F, Barlas BO, Zahoi DE, Kavakli A, Tas U, Dabak DO, Sapmaz HI, Kocabiyik N, Ozer CM, Ozcan A, Elevli L, Desdicioglu K, Alanbay I, Govsa F, Saylam CY, Akdogan I, Kiroglu Y, Onur S, Evcil EH, Cankara N, Malas MA, Kalcioglu MT, Duman S, Ulcay T, Uzun A, Karabulut Z, Barut C, Sevinc O, Yurdakan G, Kacar D, Erdogan AR, Kurt H, Demir B, Saltan M, Burukoglu D, Ustuner MC, Degirmenci I, Erdogan A, Damar O, Is M, Bayramoglu G, Kabay S, Uysal O, Senturk H, Bayramoglu A, Ozbayar C, Kutlu A, Canbek M, Cevli SC, Hancerlioglu O, Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Dikici F, Kale A, Gayretli O, Gurses IA, Ozdemir ST, Ercan I, Baskan EB, Yilmaz M, Ozkaya G, Saricaoglu H, Erturk M, Kayalioglu G, Uzel M, Kahraman G, Tanyeli E, Soyluoglu AI, Tacar O, Demirant A, Bilgin M, Karadede A, Aktas A, Evcil EH, Koyuncu E, Sulak O, Albay S, Ozguner G, Ozbek A, Ozbek E, Ozturk AH, Demirci T, Ciftcioglu E, Demir MT, Kopuz C, Eroglu E, Gedikli S, Ozyurek H, Nural MS, Incesu L, Ogur G, Kara E, Celebi B, Yildiz A, Altunkaynak BZ, Kuvat SV, Tagil SM, Ertekin C, Uysal H, Bademkiran F, Albayrak N, Esmer AF, Coskun NK, Sindel M, Kizilay F, Yalin S, Karapinar N, Tokdemir M, Karakurt L, Tumkaya L, Korkmaz A, Ayas B, Ciftci N, Terzi Y, Baran O, Nergiz Y, Akkus M, Aluclu U, Topal AE, Yuksel D, Acar HI, Kendir S, Hekimoglu E, Basman D, Duman S, Ozener B, Pelin C, Zagyapan R, Kurkcuoglu A, Koc M, Erdinc M, Erdinc L, Kelle I, Sancakdar E, Cetin N, Tunik S, Yildirim A, Kaplanoglu I, Ayaz E, Ilhan N, Okumus M, Yuksel KZ, Ciralik H, Yilmaz Z, Gumusalan Y, Gamsizkan M, Kazkayasi M, Unver Dogan N, Uysal II, Karalezli A, Fazliogullari Z, Buyukmumcu M, Bozkurt MC, Cicekcibasi AE, Demiryurek D, Ozsoy MH, Bayramoglu A, Tuccar E, Baran OP, Soker S, Bahceci S, Nasir Y, Yilmaz MT, Cicekcibasi EA, Ulusoy M, Gunaslan P, Bilge N, Akkaya M, Genc A, Akcer S, Gonul Y, Cosar E, Koken G, Ari I, Bakirci S, Kafa IM, Uysal M, Karabulut AK, Keles B, Emlik D, Uyar Y, Ozturk K, Yilmaz NA, Salbacak A, Kacira BK, Arazi M, Demirci S, Kiresi D, Gumus S, Seker M, Uyar M, Astaneh ME, Khorshid A, Uygur R, Songur A, Sonmez OF, Dogan KH, Kolcu G, Iliescu M, Bordei P, Iliescu D, Ciobotaru C, Lucescu V, Covaleov A, Ionescu C, Guirao M, Páramo E, Mutuberria R, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Roda O, Girón F, Lopez-Soler M, Roda O, Campos-López R, Guirao-Piñeiro M, Pascual-Morenilla MT, Sanchez-Montesinos I, Pascual MT, Garzon I, Serrato D, Nieto-Aguilar R, Sanchez-Montesinos I, Sanchez-Quevedo M, Ozdemir MB, Ozean RH, Bagdatli D, Adiguzel E, Dogan Z, Aycan O, Vardi N, Erkal HS, Ozturk H, Mocanu S, Stefanescu C, Ionescu A, Talpes R, Sapte E, Dina C, Surdu L, Bulbuc I, Medina MT, Medina J, López-Soler M, Martin-Oviedo C, Lowy-Benoliel A, Maranillo E, Martinez-Guirado T, Sañudo J, Scola B, Vazquez T, Arráez-Aybar LA, Conejo-Menor JL, Gonzáles-Gómez CC, Torres-García AJ, Nasu H, Chiba S, Gutierrez-Semillera M, Paksoy Y, Kalaycioglu A, Yildirim M, Ozyasar A, Ozdogmus O, Cakmak YO, Verimli U, Cavdar S, Yildizhan B, Aktan Ikiz ZA, Ucerler H, Ozgur Z, Yilmaz S, Demirtas A, Mavili E, Hacialiogullari M, Susar H, Arslan S, Aycan K, Ozkaya V, Pilmane M, Boka S, Ortug G, Ramirez C, Pascual-Font A, Valderrama-Canales F, Kucukalic A, Kapur E, Talovic E, Baca V, Grill R, Horak Z, Kachlik D, Dzupa V, Konarik M, Knize J, Veleminsky P, Smrzova T, Otcenasek M, Chmelova J, Kheck M, Kheck M Sr, Cupka T, Hnatek L, van der Meijs F, Cech P, Musil V, Ozkan HM, Muratli SK, Tayefi H, Ergur I, Kiray A, Toktas M, Alkoc O, Acar T, Uzun I, Ozen OA, Aycicek A, Alkoc OA, Unlu M, Corumlu U, Ikiz IC, Oygucu IH, Sendemir E, Kaner T, Caglar V, Eser O, Demir MT, Iyigun O, Pirzirenli G, Kaya AH, Aydin ME, Celik F, True H, Ozkaya S, Ergur BU, Zeybek G, Bacakoglu K, Tadjalli M, Poostpasand A, Mansouiri SH, Allahvaisi O, Soleimanirad J, Nikkhoo B, Nagato Y, Haruki Y, Yazawa K, Okazaki T, Haida M, Imai Y, Peirouvi T, Mahzad-Sadaghiani M, Noroozinia F, Siamak S, Farjah G, Mola S, Biegaj E, Skadorwa T, Pawlewicz K, Kapolka R, Chachulska A, Zabicka J, Krasowska A, Prusik A, Jaczewski G, Kolesnik A, Taghavi MM, Alavi SH, Moallem SA, Safikhani Z, Panahi M, Dabiri S, Shekaari MA, Latorre R, Soria F, Lopez-Albors O, Sarria R, Ayala I, Serrano I, Perez-Cuadrado E, Musienko V, Tkachenko D, Colakoglu N, Kus MA, Jalali M, Nikravesh MR, Moeen AA, Karimfar MH, Rafighdoost H, Mohammadi S, Korneeva M, Rafighdoust H, Lovasova K, Bolekova A, Kluchova D, Sulla I, Kapitonova MY, Syed Ahmad Fuad SB, Jayakaran F, Shams AR, Aghaee F, Baqer Z, Faroki M, Das S, Kassim N, Latiff A, Suhaimi F, Ghafar N, Hlaing KP, Maatoq I, Othman F, Kiray M, Bagriyanik HA, Pekcetin C, Ozogul C, Fidan M, Suhaimi F, Sun F, Sanchez-Margallo F, Gil F, Crisostomo V, Uson J, Ramirez G, Turamanlar O, Kirpiko O, Haktanir A, Climent S, Losilla S, Climent M, Sarikcioglu L, Senol Y, Yildirim FB, Utuk A, Kunicki J, Pasbakhsh P, Omidi N, Omidi H, Nazhvani FD, Ghalebi SR, Javan N, Mohagery A, Bideskan AR, Taheri MM, Fazel AR, Tiengo C, Macchi V, Stecco C, Porzionato A, Mazzoleni F, De Caro R, Clemente A, Morra A, Greco P, Pavan P, Natali A, Demir M, Dokur M, Acer N, Mavi A, Matveeva N, Lazarova D, Korneti K, Jovevska S, Jurkovik D, Papazova M, Havasi M, Alboghobeish N, Savari A, Salamat N, Sharifi M, Kwak HH, Hu KS, Kim GC, Park BS, Kim HJ, Sinav A, Gulati AK, Gulati NK, Alshammary H, Nazhvani SD, Vafafar A, Esmaeilpour T, Bahmanpour S, Elyasi L, Monabbati A, Ghanadi M, Paryani MR, Gilanpour H, Amirsam B, Omaña RE, López SG, De la Garza Castro O, Vega EU, Lopez SG, Talebpour F, Golmohammadi R, Dashti G, Atlasi MA, Mehdizadeh M, Bahadori MH, Joghataei MT, Hatami L, Boroujeni MB, Estakhr J, Esfandiary E, Marzban M, Bakhtiary M, Modiry N, Jafarpur M, Mofidpur H, Alavi SH, Mahmoudian A, Taghavi MM, Jafarpour M, Mahmoudian AR, Sanjarmousavi N, Doassans I, Sorrenti N, Decuadro G, Saibene A, Poumayrac M, Laza S, Almiron C, Vergara ME, Soria V, Lasa S, Perez A, Castro G, Maria AS, Soleimani M, Katebi M, Bakhshayesh M, Oner M, Halici M, Yikilmaz A, Guney A, Turk Y, Edizer M, Beden U, Icten N, Afshar M, Hasanzadeh Taheri MM, Moalem A, Golalipour MJ, Tamizi A, Ahi M, Mohammadpour S, Maiery A, Acikel C, Ulkur E, Karagoz H, Celikoz B, Bedi K, Ginus P, Golalipoor MJ, Mohammadi MR, Jhand P, Mansourian AR, Hosseinpoor K, Keshtkar AA, Alsaffar R, Balajadeh BK, Ghafari S, Azarhosh R, Fazeli SA, Jahanshahi M, Gharravi AM, Alicioglu B, Karakas HM, Harma A, Yang HM, Won SY, Lee JG, Lee JY, Lee JY, Kim YR, Song WC, Koh KS, Hwang EN, Choi HG, Kim SH, Kim SY, Hur MS, Ulucam E, Celbis O, Kim DH, Hong HS, Kim HJ, Choi JH, Park JT, Kim HC, Abbasi H, Hosseinipanah SM, Hosseini M, Amani A, Ashrafi HR, Sadeghimehr M, Kim HJ, Sheverdin V, Amani Z, Ashrafi A, Ashrafi AR, Javad H, Kachap MJ, Laza S, Poumayrac MC, Doassans I, Vergara ME, Almirón C, Soria V, Rivara A, Sirilo A, Freire D, Cirillo A, Veragara ME, Krmek V, Krmek N, Jo-Osvatic A, Nikolic V, Radic R, Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Fogg Q, Ashwood N, Cilingiroglu S, Ozbakir C, Mazoochi T, Sabanciogullari V, Gumus C, Erdil FH, Cimen M, Moodi H, Ghiasi F, Akbari A, Hami J, Khazei M, Haghparast E, Mitsakis I, Anastasiou A, Mitsakis M, Sianou K, Hainoglou R, Francisco M, Mitsaki C, Konstantinidi M, Prapa S, Leksan I, Mrcela T, Selthofer R, Kermanian F, Mahmoudian A, Ahmadpoor ME, Dalili N, Elian AH, Moaiery A, Jamalpour Z, Nourani MR, Asgari A, Hassanzadeh Taheri MM, Ebrahimzadeh A, Eftekharvaghefi SH, Mohammadi A, Sheibani V, Nematollahi-Mahani SN, Latifpour M, Deilami M, Soroure-Azimzadeh B, Nabipour F, Najafipour H, Nakhaee N, Yaghoobi M, Eftekharvaghefi R, Salehinejad P, Azizi H, Riasi HR, Nobakht M, Asalgoo S, Rahbar R, Najafzadeh N, Moosavizadeh K, Ezzatabadypour M, Majidi M, Malekpor-Afshar R, Karimzade F, Hoseini M, Bayat M, Gorgi A, Nezhadi A, Bakhtiari M, Jazi HR, Jafaryan M, Haghir H, Hosseini M, Rahimi S, Rassouli FB, Gorji A, Habibi A, Pouya F, Dabiri S, Mousavi A, Rajabalian S, Abolidokht A, Khanlarkhani N, Naderian H, Berjis N, Namavar MR, Talaei T, Mazaheri Z, Monabati A, Kosar MI, Karacan K, Chegini H, Nikzad H, Ayhan E, Ustundag S, Akkin SM, Ogut T, Rayegan P, Meibodi MA, Ghaem RM, Zargarpoor R, Eftekhar Vaghefi SH, Moshkdanian G, Poya F, Kohestani H, Abarghoeai RR, Abarghoeai PR, Eftekhar Vaghefi SH, Mahmodi AA, Poraboli A, Kohestani HR, Vaghefi RE, Eftekhar Vaghefy SH, Vaghefy RE, Abarghoeai PR, Saba M, Gharravi AM, Javadnia F, Zhaleh M, Nezhad DB, Gholami MR, Piagkou M, Aikaterini VK, Piagkos G, Douvetzemis S, Skandalakis P, Anagnostopoulou S, Papadopoulos N, Celik HH, Tatar I, Tatar EC, Mocan BO, Sargon MF, Denk CC, Rasoolijazi H, Joghataie MT, Roghani M, Akkin SM, Dinc G, Kurklu M, Ozboluk S, Komurcu M, Koebke J, Balioglu MB, Kaygusuz MA, Bozkus FS, Korkmaz O, Bayram SB, Can MA, Nasiri E, Jafar-Kazemi K, Hosseini M, Maghoul S, Soleimani M, Amini A, Hassanzade MM, Davari MH, Van Hoof T, Gomes GT, Audenaert E, Verstraete K, Kerckaert I, D'Herde K, Benninger B, Hedley G, Filipoiu FM, Tarta E, Enyedi M, Pantu C, Stanciulescu R, Skobowiat C, Calka J, Majewski M, Rezaian M, Yaghoobfar A, Hamedi S, and Shomali T
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. GnRH antagonists and endometrial receptivity in oocyte recipients: a prospective randomized trial.
- Author
-
Prapas N, Tavaniotou A, Panagiotidis Y, Prapa S, Kasapi E, Goudakou M, Papatheodorou A, and Prapas Y
- Subjects
- Adult, Algorithms, Double-Blind Method, Endometrium physiology, Female, Follicular Phase drug effects, Follicular Phase physiology, Hormone Antagonists therapeutic use, Humans, Male, Oocyte Donation methods, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Rate, Embryo Implantation drug effects, Endometrium drug effects, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone antagonists & inhibitors, Hormone Antagonists pharmacology, Oocytes transplantation, Transplantation physiology
- Abstract
The effect that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists exert on endometrial receptivity has not yet been elucidated. GnRH antagonists might directly affect oocytes, the embryo and/or the endometrium. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct effect of GnRH antagonists on the endometrium in oocyte donation cycles. In an oocyte donation programme, oocytes from each donor (n = 49), stimulated with gonadotrophins and a GnRH antagonist, were equally shared between two different matched recipients. Recipients were randomly allocated to either receive a GnRH antagonist concomitant to donor during their endometrial priming with oestradiol (group I, n = 49) or to solely continue with their endometrial preparation (group II, n = 49). Pregnancy rate was 55.1% in group I and 59.1% in group II. Implantation rate was 26.1% in group I and 24.4% in group II. Endometrial thickness was also similar between the two groups on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin injection to the donor. In conclusion, GnRH antagonist administration during the proliferative phase at a dose of 0.25 mg per day does not appear to adversely affect endometrial receptivity in oocyte recipients.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin during the proliferative phase may adversely affect endometrial receptivity in oocyte recipients.
- Author
-
Prapas N, Tavaniotou A, Panagiotidis Y, Prapa S, Kasapi E, Goudakou M, Papatheodorou A, and Prapas Y
- Subjects
- Adult, Chorionic Gonadotropin administration & dosage, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Endometrium drug effects, Female, Fertility Agents, Female administration & dosage, Fertilization in Vitro, Follicular Phase physiology, Humans, Infertility, Female therapy, Menotropins administration & dosage, Oocytes drug effects, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Rate, Chorionic Gonadotropin pharmacology, Embryo Implantation drug effects, Follicular Phase drug effects, Oocytes physiology
- Abstract
The effect of low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration in the proliferative phase of oocyte recipients was investigated in a prospective randomized trial. Sibling oocytes from the same donor were shared at random among two different recipients. In group I oocyte recipients received 750 IU of hCG every three days concomitant to endometrial preparation with estradiol until hCG injection to the donor, whereas in group II recipients received no hCG during endometrial priming with estradiol. Endometrial thickness was significantly lower in group I compared with group II, although similar endometrial thickness was detected during the mock cycle. Pregnancy rates were significantly lower in group I than in group II (13.6% vs. 45.4%, p<0.05). Implantation rates were also significantly lower in group I (1.7% vs. 22.4%, p<0.01). The study was discontinued prematurely for ethical reasons when 22 cycles were completed, as pregnancy rates were very low in group I. In conclusion, hCG administration in the proliferative phase might directly affect endometrial proliferation and receptivity.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study.
- Author
-
Prapas N, Prapas Y, Panagiotidis Y, Prapa S, Vanderzwalmen P, Schoysman R, and Makedos G
- Subjects
- Abortion, Spontaneous epidemiology, Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Embryo Implantation, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Follicle Stimulating Hormone therapeutic use, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone therapeutic use, Hormone Antagonists therapeutic use, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone blood, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone agonists, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone analogs & derivatives, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone antagonists & inhibitors, Oocyte Donation methods, Triptorelin Pamoate therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: The specific role of LH in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation is unclear. GnRH antagonists, when administered in the late follicular phase, induce a sharp decrease in serum LH which may be detrimental for IVF outcome. This study was performed to evaluate whether the replacement of GnRH agonist (triptorelin) by a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix; NV Organon) in oocyte donation cycles has any impact on pregnancy and implantation rates., Methods: A total of 148 donor IVF cycles was randomly assigned to use either a GnRH antagonist daily administered from the 8th day of stimulation (group I) or a GnRH agonist long protocol (group II) for the ovarian stimulation of their donors. The primary endpoints were the pregnancy and the implantation rates., Results: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (39.72%, 29/73 versus 41.33%, 31/75) based on transvaginal scan findings at 7 weeks of gestation, the implantation rate (23.9 versus 25.4%) and the first trimester abortion rate (10.34 versus 12.90%) were similar in the two groups., Conclusion: In oocyte donation cycles the replacement of GnRH agonist by a GnRH antagonist appears to have no impact on the pregnancy and implantation rates when its administration starts on day 8 of stimulation.
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers.
- Author
-
Prapas N, Prapas Y, Panagiotidis Y, Prapa S, Vanderzwalmen P, and Makedos G
- Subjects
- Adult, Catheterization, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Rate, Prospective Studies, Treatment Failure, Treatment Outcome, Embryo Transfer, Fertilization in Vitro methods, Labor Stage, First
- Abstract
Background: The difficulty of embryo transfer has been reported to affect success rates in some centres, but not in others. Cervical dilatation has been proposed as a means to overcome difficult embryo transfer, but consistent criteria for patient selection are lacking. In a prospective randomized study, we examined the influence of cervical dilatation 1-3 months before embryo transfer on the outcome of IVF in cases having difficult embryo transfer in two previously failed IVF cycles., Methods: Two alternative methods of embryo transfer preparation were evaluated in 283 randomly assigned women having difficult embryo transfers in two previously failed IVF attempts. Randomization was made using a computer-generated random number table. Cervical dilatation before starting any IVF treatment was used in 145 cases, and no dilatation was performed in 138 cases., Results: The cervical dilatation group yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate than the non-dilated group (40% versus 24%; P < 0.01). Likewise, the implantation rate (24.1% versus 14.9%; P < 0.01) and the live birth rate (34.48% versus 19.56%; P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the dilatation group than in the non-dilated group., Conclusions: In patients with prior difficult embryo transfer, cervical dilatation 1-3 months before embryo transfer lead to an improved pregnancy rate., (Copyright 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology)
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5.
- Author
-
Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Prapa S, and Vlassis G
- Subjects
- Culture Techniques, Embryo Implantation, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Embryo Transfer standards, Pregnancy Rate, Ultrasonography
- Abstract
Background: The use of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer has been reported to affect success rates in some centres but not others. In a prospective study, we examined the influence of ultrasound guidance in embryo transfer performed on different days after oocyte retrieval., Methods: Two different methods of embryo transfer were evaluated in 1069 consecutive transfers. The ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was used in 433 cases, whereas 636 embryo transfers were performed with the tactile assessment ('clinical feel') method., Results: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer yielded a higher overall pregnancy rate than the 'clinical feel' approach, 47 versus 36% (P < 0.001). This difference was statistically significant where embryos were transferred after 3 or 4 days of culture, 45.9 versus 37.1% (P = 0.001) and 42.3 versus 27% (P = 0.035) respectively but not significant (P = 0.112) on day 5 embryo transfer (56.3 versus 45.7%). Likewise, the implantation rate was significantly different between the two groups on day 3 and 4 embryo transfer, 23.3 versus 15.8% (P < 0.01) and 21.6 versus 15.7% (P < 0.05%) respectively but no statistical difference was noted on day 5 embryo transfer, 26.7 versus 23.6%., Conclusion: Ultrasound assistance in embryo transfer on day 3 and 4 significantly improved pregnancy rates in IVF but had no impact on day 5.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. The echoguide embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results.
- Author
-
Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Prapa S, Nijs M, Vanderzwalmen P, Vlassis G, and Jones EE
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Rate, Ultrasonography, Embryo Transfer methods, Fertilization in Vitro methods
- Abstract
The performance of two different methods of embryo transfer for IVF has been evaluated in 132 consecutive embryo transfers. Thirty Eight pregnancies were achieved, corresponding to a pregnancy rate of 28.7% of all embryos transfers. The embryo transfer under ultrasound control was used in 61 cases of our study whereas 71 cases were performed with the "clinical feel" method without ultrasound control. The echoguide embryo transfer procedure yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate than the blind method (36.06% versus 22.6%). The mean number of embryos transferred per attempt was similar in the two groups (3.1 +/- 0.1 and 3.0 +/- 0.1) as was the quality. The randomized comparative study will continue in order to get more data.
- Published
- 1995
15. Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy with intramuscular administration of methotrexate (MTX/CV).
- Author
-
Prapas J, Prapas N, Prapa S, Papanikolaou A, and Papanikolaou N
- Subjects
- Adult, Chorionic Gonadotropin blood, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hysterosalpingography, Injections, Intramuscular, Leucovorin therapeutic use, Methotrexate administration & dosage, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Ectopic diagnosis, Treatment Outcome, Methotrexate therapeutic use, Pregnancy, Ectopic drug therapy
- Abstract
20 cases of unruptured ectopic pregnancies were studied from August 1990 till May 1991. They were treated according to the Sauers et al. (1987) protocol with Methotrexate and rescuvolin. The treatment was successful in all but one case. Six out of 17 cases had a normal pregnancy in the 12 months following treatment. Seventeen out of 20 cases had tubal patency checked with HSG and laparoscopy. We conclude that conservative management of unruptured pregnancy with MTX must be the treatment of choice.
- Published
- 1992
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.