Search

Background: Real-world data are limited for patients with brain metastases secondary to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). This study describes real-world outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) MBC with brain metastases diagnosis before abemaciclib initiation., Patients and Methods: A nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified MBC database (January 2011-December 2021) was assessed retrospectively. Patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who were treated with abemaciclib (monotherapy or in combination) following diagnosis of brain metastases were included. Real-world best response reflected clinician-documented response assessment of the brain imaging (intracranial) and change in disease burden following radiographic imaging (extracranial); these were reported descriptively. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (rwOS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods from abemaciclib initiation (index date)., Results: Among 82 included patients (mean age 57.0 years; 98.8% female), 22.0% and 19.5% received CDK4/6i and chemotherapy before abemaciclib initiation, respectively, and the majority (80.5%) received radiation/local surgery to the brain before abemaciclib initiation. Patients mostly received abemaciclib as monotherapy (n = 6) or in combination with endocrine therapy (n = 68). Median TTD was 7.1 (95% CI 4.6-11.3) months, rwPFS was 9.2 (95% CI 6.0-11.6) months, and rwOS was 20.8 (95% CI 13.9-26.0) months. Intracranial and extracranial objective response rates, as determined by treating physicians, were 45.1% (n = 23/51) and 56.7% (n = 34/60), respectively. Intracranial and extracranial clinical benefit rates were 62.7% (n = 32/51) and 70.0% (n = 42/60), respectively., Conclusion: In this real-world study of patients diagnosed with brain metastases and initiating abemaciclib, most patients received radiation/local surgery to the brain before abemaciclib initiation. Although the outcomes in this real-world study are encouraging, it is unclear if the benefit was due to local therapy, abemaciclib, or the combination, and causality cannot be inferred. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm the clinical benefit of this approach., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) is the most frequently diagnosed metastatic breast cancer (mBC) subtype. Combinations of endocrine therapy (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4 & 6is) improve outcomes compared with ET alone. The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC has been demonstrated in the MONARCH clinical trials; however, there is a paucity of real-world evidence, particularly in older patients., Methods and Materials: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the electronic medical record data/charts of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving abemaciclib in US-based community oncology settings (1 September 2017 to 30 September 2019). Patients with other primary malignancies, clinical trial enrollment, and incomplete charts were excluded. Patient characteristics, treatment attributes and patterns, and real-world outcomes (clinical benefit rate [CBR] and stable disease among patients with response data available, time to chemotherapy [TTC], time to treatment discontinuation [TTD], and progression-free survival [PFS]) were summarized. Multivariable models evaluated the association between demographic/clinical characteristics and outcomes., Results: Of the 448 final patients, 99% were female, with a median age of 67 years (25% were ≥ 75 years) and median follow-up of 11 months; most (60%) initiated abemaciclib within 2 years of mBC diagnosis. Patients received a median of 1 (P25 = 0, P75 = 3) prior line of therapy for mBC before abemaciclib, including other CDK4 & 6is (48%) and prior chemotherapy (31%); most (57%) had visceral disease. The CBR for the overall population was 53%, with 48% achieving stable disease. The median TTC was not reached; median TTD was 249 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 202, 304). The median PFS was 329 days (95% CI 266, 386). The discontinuation rate of abemaciclib owing to adverse events (30%) trended higher with age (years) (P = 0.027): 18-49 (n = 42; 19%), 50-64 (n = 155; 25%), 65-74 (n = 138; 32%), 75-84 (n = 82; 37%), ≥ 85 (n = 31; 49%); only 23% of patients overall had a dose hold or reduction prior to discontinuation., Conclusions: These patients were older than those in the MONARCH studies with substantial visceral disease, and prior chemotherapy and CDK4 & 6i use. Discontinuation rates were higher than in previous real-world studies (11.9%), highlighting the need for proactive management to optimize outcomes, particularly in older patients with mBC., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Breast cancer in males constitutes approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases globally. Despite extensive treatment experience with abemaciclib in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), real-world evidence in male MBC is lacking., Methods: This analysis was a part of a broader, retrospective study that analyzed electronic medical records and charts of 448 men and women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) MBC who initiated an abemaciclib-containing regimen from January 2017 through September 2019. Data were collected from the Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute and the Electronic Medical Office Logistics Health Oncology Warehouse Language™ databases and summarized descriptively. Real-world best response was described: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD)., Results: Data for six male patients with MBC who were treated with abemaciclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant are presented. Four patients were aged ≥ 75 years, and four patients had ≥ 3 metastatic sites, including visceral involvement. Abemaciclib was initiated in/after third-line (≥ 3L) in four patients, and patients had history of treatment with AI (n = 4), chemotherapy (n = 3), and/or prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (n = 2) in the metastatic setting. Abemaciclib + fulvestrant was the most common abemaciclib-containing regimen (n = 4). Best response was documented in four patients: 1 each with CR, PR, SD, and PD., Conclusion: Prevalence of male MBC in this dataset was consistent with expected prevalence in the broader population. Most male patients received an abemaciclib-containing regimen in ≥ 3L, with anti-cancer activity observed despite heavy metastatic burden and prior treatments in a metastatic setting., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Abemaciclib is the most recent oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4 & 6i) to receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval to treat hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Administrative claims data were used to describe patient characteristics and select clinical and economic outcomes in US patients treated in routine clinical practice. Prior analyses from electronic health records data indicate approximately 25% of patients received either palbociclib or ribociclib for MBC before initiating abemaciclib treatment; this work further explored these findings and associated outcomes., Methods: This retrospective study analyzed medical and pharmacy claims from the IBM ® MarketScan ® Research Databases between 1 January 2007 to 31 January 2020. Patients with HR+, HER2- MBC newly initiating abemaciclib between 1 September 2017 and 31 October 2019 were included and grouped by concomitant therapy (+aromatase inhibitor (AI), +fulvestrant (F), 200 mg abemaciclib monotherapy (Mono), or +other), and outcomes were analyzed by prior CDK4 & 6i use. Patient and treatment characteristics were summarized with descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier methods assessed time-to-discontinuation (TTD; i.e., persistency) and time-to-chemotherapy (TTC). Adherence (defined by the medication possession ratio) and drug wastage were determined., Results: This analysis included 454 patients (mean age 57.7 years), with 35.0% (n = 159) in the +F group, 29.3% (n = 133) in the +AI group, 10.4% (n = 47) in the 200 mg Mono group, and 25.3% (n = 115) in the +other group. Prior chemotherapy and CDK 4 & 6i use were present in 23.8% and 49.8% of all patients, respectively. Visceral metastases were present at abemaciclib initiation in 50.4% in the +AI group; 49.7% in the +F group; and 55.3% in the 200 mg Mono group. Liver metastases were present in 33.7% of the overall population. Among patients without prior CDK4 & 6i use, the median TTD for patients receiving abemaciclib + AI was not reached [95% CI 430-not reached (NR) days], abemaciclib + F [531 days (95% CI 281-NR)], and abemaciclib mono [141 days (95% CI 80-NR)]. Median TTC for abemaciclib + AI and abemaciclib + F groups were not reached and the median TTC for abemaciclib mono was 535 days (95% CI 181-NR). Medication adherence was 88.7% and medication wastage costs among those with at least one dose modification were $808.12 and $452.2 per patient per month based on amount paid and wholesale acquisition cost (WAC), respectively. Mean length of follow-up for all patients was 350 days (SD 187)., Conclusion: These real-world data complement clinical trial results by examining abemaciclib use among patients treated in routine clinical practice. The sizeable number of patients treated with prior CDK4 & 6i, chemotherapy, and/or visceral metastases at abemaciclib initiation suggest that many patients had very advanced disease and/or were in later stages of their treatment. These data confirm a higher percentage of patients treated with previous CDK4 & 6i than reported previously, reinforcing the importance of the ongoing, prospective clinical trials evaluating outcomes following progression on CDK4 & 6i., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: To examine the real-world incidence and management of select adverse events (AEs) among female patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), receiving a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4 and 6) inhibitor (palbociclib, abemaciclib, or ribociclib)., Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from the US Oncology Network iKnowMed electronic health record database for 396 patients with an initial MBC diagnosis on/after 1 January 2014 and receipt of first CDK4 and 6 regimen between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018. In this descriptive study, the proportion of patients who experienced select AEs and associated dose modifications or discontinuations were reported. The occurrence of select healthcare resource utilization categories was also reported., Results: Median follow-up time was 451, 262, and 355 days for patients in the palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib cohorts, respectively. The most common AEs were neutropenia (palbociclib, 44.8%; abemaciclib, 10.6%; ribociclib, 36.3%), diarrhea (palbociclib, 8.0%; abemaciclib, 43.0%; ribociclib, 8.8%), and fatigue (palbociclib, 12.9%; abemaciclib, 17.6%; ribociclib, 16.5%). AEs resulted in a treatment hold among 91 (23.0%), a dose reduction among 86 (21.7%), and permanent discontinuation among 48 (12.1%) patients overall., Conclusions: This real-world study provides insight into the occurrence of AEs which varied by CDK4 and 6 inhibitor. Compared to clinical trials, frequencies of AEs were numerically lower but dose reductions due to AEs were numerically higher. It is possible these differences reflect proactive management of AEs on the part of clinicians to help patients remain on therapy.

Background: This study explored the impact of multiple prognostic factors on patient overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2 - ) metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used electronic health record data of patients in the United States from community oncology practices from January 1, 2008 to April 30, 2017. Eligibility included HR + /HER2 - MBC diagnosis in 2008 or later and prior systemic therapy for MBC. An index variable was created to assess the effect of multiple clinical prognostic factors collectively, including liver metastases (LM), primary endocrine resistance (PER), negative progesterone receptor (PR - ) status, and high tumor grade (TG). Patients were grouped based on the number of prognostic factors present at MBC diagnosis: 0, 1, and 2+. Differences in rwPFS and OS from start of first-line therapy were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression., Results: Approximately 29.1% of the 378 eligible patient sample had 0, 36.0% had 1, and 34.9% had 2+ prognostic factors. For the patients with 1 of the prognostic factors, 24.3% had high TG, 14.7% were LM+, 39.7% had PER, and 21.3% were PR - . Univariate and multivariate results showed that rwPFS and OS were significantly (P < .05) shorter in patients with 1 and 2+ prognostic factors compared with patients with 0., Conclusions: The individual prognostic factors and the prognostic factor index may enable early identification of patients with a less favorable prognosis across the HR + /HER2 - MBC population and help inform treatment decisions in difficult-to-treat populations., (Copyright © 2021 Eli Lilly and Company. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This retrospective observational study described baseline characteristics, real-world treatment patterns, and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with abemaciclib in the United States., Methods: De-identified electronic health record-derived data were used to describe patients who began abemaciclib treatment on or after 30 June 2016 and ≥4 months before data cutoff (31 December 2018). Real-world response (rwR) and real-world progression assessments were abstracted from clinical documentation. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the real-world best response. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated real-world time to first response (rwTTFR) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS)., Results: The median age of 118 female patients at abemaciclib initiation was 66.5 years (interquartile range, 57.0, 73.0). The breakdown of patients who received abemaciclib in first, second, third, or later lines was 28.8%, 21.2%, 20.3%, and 29.7%, respectively. Patients received abemaciclib as monotherapy (12.7%) or in combination with endocrine therapy: fulvestrant (59.3%); aromatase inhibitor (22.9%); aromatase inhibitor and fulvestrant (5.1%). There were 68 patients (57.6%) with ≥1 rwR assessment: 41.2% with a real-world complete response or real-world partial response. Median rwTTFR was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval, 3.5, 5.2). Twelve-month rwPFS probability was 61.7%., Conclusions: This study represents utilization and outcomes associated with abemaciclib approximately 1 year following FDA approval. Treatment patterns demonstrated heterogeneity and, as in clinical trials, patients appeared to benefit from abemaciclib treatment in the real world. More research investigating outcomes associated with abemaciclib treatment is needed, with larger samples and longer follow-up to enable closer evaluation by subgroup, regimen, and line of therapy.

Objectives: To compare user satisfaction and adverse events (AEs) with a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 8; average levonorgestrel release rate approximately 8 μg/24 h over the first year [total content 13.5 mg]) and a 30 μg ethinyl estradiol/3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSP) combined oral contraceptive (COC) in a population of young women., Methods: Nulliparous and parous women (aged 18-29 years) with regular menstrual cycles (21-35 days) were randomised to LNG-IUS 8 or EE/DRSP for 18 months. The primary endpoint was the overall user satisfaction rate at month 18/end of study visit., Results: Overall, 279 women were randomised to LNG-IUS 8 with attempted placement and 281 women were randomised to EE/DRSP and took ≥1 pill; the mean age was 23.7 and 23.9 years, and 77.4% and 73.3% were nulliparous, respectively. At month 18/end of study, 82.1% and 81.9% of women, respectively, reported being 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with their treatment; however, significantly more LNG-IUS 8 users reported a preference to continue their treatment post-study (66.2% vs 48.8%; p = 0.0001). There were two pregnancies (one ectopic pregnancy, one spontaneous abortion) reported in the LNG-IUS 8 group and six (three live births, two spontaneous abortions, one induced abortion) in the EE/DRSP group., Conclusions: LNG-IUS 8 and EE/DRSP were associated with similarly high user satisfaction rates. However, LNG-IUS 8 users were significantly more likely to prefer to continue their contraceptive method post-study, indicating that a levonorgestrel intrauterine system is an appealing contraceptive option for young women.

Objective: To compare the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 8), which has an average levonorgestrel release rate of ∼8 μg/24 hours during the first year (total levonorgestrel content 13.5 mg; Jaydess/Skyla), with the etonogestrel (ENG) subdermal implant (total content, 68 mg) with regard to the 12-month discontinuation rate (primary outcome)., Design: Randomized, open-label, phase III study., Setting: Thirty-eight centers in six European countries., Patient(s): Study population of 766 healthy nulliparous and parous women aged 18-35 years., Intervention(s): The LNG-IUS 8 or the ENG implant., Main Outcome Measure(s): Discontinuation rate, by treatment group, at Month 12., Result(s): The 12-month discontinuation rates were 19.6% and 26.8% in the LNG-IUS 8 and ENG implant groups, respectively. The -7.2% difference was statistically significant (95% confidence interval -13.2%, -1.2%). Fewer women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group discontinued because of increased bleeding (3.2% vs. 11.3%) or adverse events (14.3% vs. 21.8%). At 12 months, more women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group were "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern (60.9% vs. 33.6%) and reported a preference to use their study treatment after study completion (70.1% vs. 58.5%)., Conclusion(s): The LNG-IUS 8 was associated with a significantly lower 12-month discontinuation rate compared with the ENG implant; mainly because ENG implant users frequently discontinued due to increased bleeding. More LNG-IUS 8 users than ENG implant users reported being "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern, and reported a preference to continue using their study treatment after the study., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01397097., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems (LNG-IUSs; total content 13.5 mg [average approx. 8 μg/24 hours over the first year; LNG-IUS 8] and total content 19.5 mg [average approx. 13 μg/24 hours over the first year; LNG-IUS 13]) have previously been shown to be highly effective (3-year Pearl Indices: 0.33 and 0.31, respectively), safe and well tolerated. The present subgroup analyses evaluated whether or not outcomes were affected by parity, age (18-25 vs 26-35 years), or body mass index (BMI, <30 vs ≥30 kg/m2)., Methods: Nulliparous and parous women aged 18‒35 years with regular menstrual cycles (21‒35 days) requesting contraception were randomized to 3 years of LNG-IUS 8 or LNG-IUS 13 use., Results: In the LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 groups, 1432 and 1452 women, respectively, had a placement attempted and were included in the full analysis set; 39.2%, 39.2% and 17.1% were 18-25 years old, nulliparous and had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, respectively. Both systems were similarly effective regardless of age, parity or BMI; the subgroup Pearl Indices had widely overlapping 95% confidence intervals. Placement of LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 was easier (p < 0.0001) and less painful (p < 0.0001) in women who had delivered vaginally than in women who had not. The complete/partial expulsion rate was 2.2-4.2% across all age and parity subgroups and higher in parous than in nulliparous women (p = 0.004). The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 0.1-0.6% across all age and parity subgroups: nulliparous and younger women were not at higher risk than parous and older women, respectively. The ectopic pregnancy rate was 0.3-0.4% across all age and parity subgroups. Across all age and parity subgroups, the 3-year completion rate was 50.9-61.3% for LNG-IUS 8 and 57.9-61.1% for LNG-IUS 13, and was higher (p = 0.0001) among older than younger women in the LNG-IUS 8 group only., Conclusions: LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 were highly effective, safe and well tolerated regardless of age or parity., Trial Registration: Clinical trials.gov NCT00528112.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems., Methods: Nulliparous and parous women aged 18-35 years with regular menstrual cycles (21-35 days) requesting contraception were randomized to 3 years of treatment with one of two levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems: 13.5 mg total content or 19.5 mg total content. The primary outcome was the pregnancy rate, calculated as the Pearl Index., Results: Overall, 1,432 and 1,452 women in the 13.5 mg intrauterine contraceptive system and 19.5 mg intrauterine contraceptive system groups, respectively, had a placement attempted and were included in the full analysis set to evaluate efficacy and safety. Mean (standard deviation) age was 27.1 (4.8) years; 39.2% were nulliparous. Over the 3-year study period, 0.33 pregnancies per 100 women-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.60) were observed with the 13.5 mg intrauterine contraceptive system compared with 0.31 per 100 women-years (95% CI 0.15-0.57) with the 19.5 mg intrauterine contraceptive system. Kaplan-Meier estimates for that period were 0.009 and 0.010, respectively. At least partial expulsions occurred in 4.56% and 3.58% and discontinuation rates resulting from a reported adverse event occurred in 21.9% and 19.1%, respectively. Ten of the 20 pregnancies were ectopic. Serious adverse events included six cases of pelvic inflammatory disease and one partial uterine perforation., Conclusions: Both lower-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems were highly effective for 3 years of use and generally well tolerated., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00528112., Level of Evidence: : I.

Objective: Monthly bleeding can be uncomfortable and inconvenient. Fifty years after the introduction of the pill, one wonders whether women still want to bleed every month., Methods: Cross-national online survey of women aged 15-49 years (N = 4039) who were currently using, had used or would consider using a hormonal contraceptive. The survey was conducted in eight countries across Europe, North America and Latin America to assess attitudes towards monthly bleeding., Results: Almost one-third of women reported that bleeding had a severe negative impact on their daily life, particularly with respect to sexual life and sports activities. Approximately 60% of women would, at least sometimes, like to postpone their bleeding and 50% wished they had the flexibility to determine when their menstrual bleeding starts. Overall, 34% of women would change the frequency of their bleeding to once every two or three months., Conclusions: Past, current or future users of hormonal contraception reported that bleeding has a severe negative impact on daily life. Given the choice, most women surveyed would reduce the frequency of their bleeding.