Search

Introduction: The knowledge of clinicians regarding blood transfusion services may impact patient care and transfusion outcome. The wide variation in transfusion practices among clinicians leads to inappropriate blood product usage and jeopardizes patient safety. Hence, this survey study aimed to assess knowledge, attitude and practice among the residents and interns of safe blood transfusion., Methods: The online survey was based on self-administered questionnaires of three sections: 1. Demography; 2. Knowledge, and; 3. Attitude and Practice. One point was assigned for the correct response of each question in every section. The knowledge score was further categorized into three categories, depending on the points obtained. The participants were also divided into four groups, depending on their experience. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to determine the difference of knowledge and practice scores in three designated groups of residents and interns. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant., Result: A total of 247 residents and interns participated in this study. Thirteen participants had an incomplete response. Out of 234 participants, Senior Residents (SR), Junior Residents (JR), and interns were 70, 96 and 68 participants, respectively. The knowledge scores of interns were significantly low, as compared to SRs and JRs. Practice scores of interns were also significantly low, compared to the JRs. However, most of the residents and interns (85%) were aware of the pre-transfusion testing., Conclusion: Therefore, the mandatory incorporation of the transfusion medicine subject in the undergraduate curriculum can help the young budding doctors to better implement the patient blood management., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Troubleshooting for any fault of apheresis equipment or kit is hardly addressed. Here, we report a unique problem of air trapping in a kit at two different positions leading to failure of the plateletpheresis procedure. Two plateletpheresis procedures were aborted due to "Access pressure low", though the needle position was absolutely perfect. In the third event, platelet yield was not increasing even after 30 minutes from the time of initiation. It was completed after stopping the centrifuge pump which could have displaced the air bubble from the collection port. The root cause for these events was analyzed in consultation with the apheresis technical expert and "air block" was found to be the cause. Air block can also result in a "low access pressure" alarm despite improper phlebotomy being the common cause. Perfect kit loading, checking of tubing defects prior to loading, and comparative analysis of troubleshooting to have adequate knowledge are essential tools for the smooth functioning of apheresis., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Routray et al.)

In developing nations, limitations in diagnostic facilities act as a barrier for differentiation of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) based on the etiology. A sick-looking 18-month-old boy presented to our hospital in Bhubaneswar, India, with clinical signs and symptoms of left lobar pneumonia, abnormal hematological and renal parameters, no growth in blood culture, a negative direct antiglobulin test (DAT) result, and low complement levels. A rapid deterioration in his clinical condition necessitated intensive care support, blood transfusion, and renal replacement therapy (peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis). Because his health care team suspected atypical HUS, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was initiated as soon as possible. In the absence of a lectin panel, minor cross-matching confirmed T-antigen exposure. With a diagnosis of HUS induced by Streptococcus pneumoniae (sp-HUS), TPE was stopped immediately, and washed blood components were administered. Despite the aforementioned measures, the boy died of HUS on day 20 after presentation. This case emphasized the role of minor cross-matching in the detecting of polyagglutination in resolving the diagnostic dilemma of sp-HUS., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objectives: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been used in severe COVID-19 disease to eliminate the cytokine storm. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of TPE in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 disease compared to standard treatment., Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane database and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP). The random-effect model was used to calculate the risk ratio and standardized mean difference (SMD) as pooled effect size for the difference in mortality and length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The risk of bias and publication bias were assessed in R version 4.1.0. The certainty of the evidence was calculated using the GradePro tool., Results: The database identified 382 participants from six studies, including one randomized control trial. Egger's test did not detect any publication bias (p = 0.178). The random model analysis for mortality evaluated a risk ratio of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.28-0.52) with a significant reduction in the TPE group. The certainty of the evidence was moderate, with a risk ratio of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.24-0.49). Length of ICU stays between TPE versus standard care showed an SMD of 0.08 (95% CI: -0.38, 0.55) and was not significant., Conclusion: The length of ICU stay in the TPE group was not different from standard care. However, this meta-analysis revealed a significant benefit of TPE in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 disease compared to standard treatment., (© 2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion.)

Background and Aims: Paravertebral block (PVB) is an established method, indicated for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Although many additives to bupivacaine in PVB have been tried to prolong the analgesia in postoperative period, no additive has been found without any adverse effects. We have compared the duration of analgesia in PVB using adjuvants like dexmedetomidine and fentanyl with bupivacaine after MRM., Methods: A total of 60 female patients enroled for MRM were divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group BF received PVB with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 1 mg/kg and group BD received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% with dexmedetomidine 1 mg/kg for PVB. After confirming successful PVB, surgery was done under general anaesthesia. Time for first rescue analgesic request was the primary outcome of the study. The secondary outcome was comparison of visual analogue scale scores for pain and total analgesic consumption. Side effects like sedation, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia and hypotension in the postoperative period till 24 h were also assessed., Results: The time for first rescue analgesic request was 6.32 ± 1.75 h in the BD group contrary to 3.94 ± 2.12 h in group BF (P < 0.05). Total paracetamol consumed as rescue analgesia in the first 24 h of postoperative period was remarkably reduced in group BD (1.7 ± 0.94 gm) in contrary to group BF (2.6 ± 0.98 gm) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the groups., Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provides prolonged postoperative analgesia compared with fentanyl when used as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in PVB after MRM., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.)

Background and Objectives: Blood donor deferral is an essential tool for blood safety. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected blood transfusion services all over the world. But its impact on donor deferral rate and the pattern is unclear in light of the new donor deferral policy due to the COVID-19 pandemic., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was divided into pre-COVID and COVID (15 March 2019-14 March 2021). All the deferred donors were divided into six different categories: (1) medical causes, (2) surgical causes, (3) drugs and vaccination, (4) risk of transfusion-transmitted diseases, (5) miscellaneous causes and (6) flu-like symptoms. In addition, COVID-related deferrals were also incorporated. All these above categories along with the donor demography were analysed by SPSS software version 25., Results: The donor deferral rate was 17.03% and 12.74% during the pre-COVID and COVID periods, respectively. During the pre-COVID period, Category 3 deferrals and during COVID period, Category 6 deferrals were significantly higher. A reversal in pattern with increased blood pressure (40.2% vs. 24.04%) over-riding low haemoglobin (34.77% vs. 55.5%) was noted in the Category 1 deferral during the COVID period. Category 1 deferral was more in middle-aged adults as compared to young and old adults (p < 0.05). Among middle-aged adults, deferral due to flu-like symptoms was also significantly more during the COVID period (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: COVID-19 significantly affected the donor pool and changed the pattern of donor deferral. Understanding donor deferral patterns may help in identifying targeted donor populations and planning donor recruitment strategies in future pandemic crises., (© 2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion.)

Objective  ABO typing constitutes cell grouping and serum grouping. The discrepancy may arise in ABO typing due to a mismatch in cell grouping and serum grouping. It may be due to technical errors, missing or weak ABO antibodies (type I), weak ABO subgroups (type II), Rouleaux formation (type III), or other miscellaneous reasons (type IV). This study was carried out to determine the prevalence and cause of ABO blood group discrepancy in donor samples at our center. Methods  A retrospective study of ABO blood group typing of blood donors was conducted at our center. The blood group typing was routinely performed using gel cards and a microcentrifuge system (Tulip Diagnostics(P) Ltd, Goa, India). If any discrepancy in ABO typing was noted, the test was repeated using the conventional tube technique. After sorting clerical/technical error, the causes of discrepancy were analyzed and resolved using anti-A 1 , anti-H, anti-AB, and other immunohematological tests like antibody screening and identification, saliva inhibition test, adsorption-elution studies. Results  A total of 12,715 (98.6% males and 1.4% females) donor samples were tested. The number of ABO discrepancies detected were 15 (0.12%). The discrepancies were characterized as type I (6 cases; 40%), type II (1 case; 6.7%), type III (0 cases; 0%), and type IV (8 cases; 53.3%). Three cases, each of anti-M and anti-Le b , were detected in the study population. A single case of A 3 , a subgroup of A blood group, was found during the study. Conclusion  The prevalence of ABO group discrepancy was 0.12% at our center. Discrepancy arising during ABO typing of blood donor must be resolved before reporting ABO blood group to minimize the recipient's chances of transfusion reaction. The serum grouping is equally crucial as cell grouping for reporting the ABO group of an individual., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).)

Background and objective The exact burden of hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) attributed to neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia (NUH) in developing nations is still unclear. Still, anti-D is reported to be the most common cause of HDN in India. ABO incompatibility has emerged as a leading cause of exchange transfusion (ET) in many countries. But many centers in our country rely on direct antiglobulin test (DAT) as a screening tool to evaluate immunological causes, whereas advanced immunohematological workup like antibody screening, identification, and elution tests are also required. Early identification of implicated antibodies resulting in HDN can aid in the proper selection of blood units when ET is indicated, and hence also in managing the subsequent pregnancy. This study focused on determining the causes of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NH), especially with respect to immunohematological evaluation. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 240 neonates requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) support for NUH at a tertiary care hospital. Materials and methods Demographic data, along with detailed history pertaining to the cause of hyperbilirubinemia, was collected. Clinical and laboratory evaluation and complete immunohematological work including DAT, heat elution, antibody screening, antibody identification, and Rh Kell phenotyping were performed from neonate blood samples. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Pathological jaundice was more common (62.1%) than physiological jaundice (37.9%). The various pathological causes identified were HDN (42.6%), sepsis (12%), cephalohematoma (5.4%), and idiopathic (1.7%). Among HDN cases, ABO incompatibility (39.2%) was the most prevalent cause, followed by Rh HDN and G6PD deficiency (1.7% each). DAT was positive in only 14 cases out of 94 ABO-incompatible cases. Elution revealed antibodies in four DAT-negative neonates with ABO incompatibility and more specificity to the OA setting. DAT was positive with 100% sensitivity in Rh HDN cases (n=4). Elution demonstrated the presence of anti-D (n=2), anti-D + anti-C (n=1) and anti-E (n=1), confirming Rh HDN. DAT strength was found to be significantly associated with hemoglobin (Hb) level (p=0.048). The majority of cases were treated with phototherapy only (94.1%), and 10 cases received both ET and phototherapy. Four neonates' condition improved without any intervention. Conclusion This study highlighted the shift in the trend from Rh HDN to ABO incompatibility as the cause of hemolytic jaundice in NICU neonates. Elution tests can aid in the diagnosis of DAT-negative ABO-incompatible hemolytic anemia. Early diagnosis, along with timely intervention and appropriate measures, can prevent neonatal morbidity and mortality. Negative DAT does not rule out HDN. Sensitive techniques like elution must be used in the presence of clinical suspicion., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Routray et al.)

Introduction: Polyagglutination is a rare entity in immunohematology and unusually presents in a healthy blood donor. The general presentation was described in the literature in association with bacterial infections, which result in the exposure of crypt antigens. Nowadays, polyagglutination is rarely detected due to the use of monoclonal antisera. Our case report describes the presence of Tn polyagglutination in a healthy adult blood donor with no prior history of any infection in the recent past., Methods: Immunohematology work-up for incompatible cross-match was done in the serology lab using commercially procured antisera and column agglutination gel card (Tulip Diagnostics India Pvt. Ltd, Goa, India). The three cell-screening panel was procured commercially (ID Dia cell I, II, III; Bio-Rad, Switzerland), and in-house lectin was prepared as per the standard method., Result: We have come across a case of incompatible cross-match with negative antibody screen, auto-control, and Negative direct coombs test. Cross-match with multiple adult serum and cord serum gives us a clue towards polyagglutination. Further, Polyagglutination was confirmed serologically using anti-A1 lectin and later concludes of Tn type by lectin prepared in-house from Salvia Sclarea., Conclusion: Resolution of incompatible cross-match in a case of polyagglutination needs a skilled workforce and rare reagents. Identification of reason for incompatibility helps in an early issue of blood units., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Shoulder arthroscopic surgeries can produce intense post-operative pain. Inter-scalene block (ISB) provides good analgesia after shoulder surgery, but concerns over its associated risks have prompted the search for alternatives. Shoulder block (SHB), which includes suprascapular block along with axillary nerve (AN) block, was recently proposed as an alternative to ISB, but evidence of its efficacy is conflicting. The aim of our study was to compare SHB with ISB in shoulder surgery for post-operative analgesia., Methods: A total of 76 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopic surgery were equally divided into 2 groups of 38 patients each: ISB group and SHB group. Both the nerve blocks were achieved by using ultrasound and a nerve stimulator. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were evaluated at 1, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h post-operatively. The time to first analgesia request, total analgesic requirement for 24 h post-operatively, patient satisfaction and any complications were recorded., Results: SHB provided equivalent analgesia to ISB in terms of post-operative VAS scores. Time to first analgesic request was 6.2 ± 1.3 h in ISB group and 5.9 ± 1.2 h in SHB group, which was not statistically significant. Complications like subjective dyspnoea and weakness of arm were significantly higher in ISB group compared to SHB group. Patient satisfaction scores were also significantly higher in SHB group compared to ISB group., Conclusion: SHB is as effective as ISB for post-operative pain relief and with fewer complications due to selective blockade of suprascapular and axillary nerves., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Background and Aims: Analgesic effect of gabapentin and pregabalin is well-defined in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Postoperative pain after lumbar spine surgery limits the function of patients in the postoperative period, for which the search for ideal analgesic goes on. The aim of the present study was to compare pregabalin and gabapentin as a pre-emptive analgesic in elective lumbar spine surgeries., Material and Methods: In this randomized prospective study, 75 patients were allocated into three groups of 25 each. Group G, group PG, and group P received two capsules of gabapentin 300 mg each, two capsules of pregabalin 150 mg each, and two multivitamin capsules, respectively, with sip of water 1 hour before the expected time of induction of anesthesia. Time for requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia, reduction in postoperative pain score and total dose of rescue analgesic used in first 24 hours postoperatively, and side effects were compared., Result: Time for requirement of first dose of rescue analgesic in PG group was 180.12 min and in G group was 104.16 min, which was statistically significant. Both G and PG group had lower visual analogue scale (VAS) score in comparison to P group, which was statistically significant. Consumption of rescue analgesic was less in G and PG group in comparison to P group. Amount of rescue analgesic requirement were low in PG group in comparison to G group ( P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Though both study drugs had produced prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to placebo, pregabalin had better analgesic profile in postoperative period than gabapentin., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Background: Many adjuvants have been used with local anesthetics to reduce the time of onset and prolong the duration of analgesia in brachial plexus blocks. However, few studies are there using verapamil as an adjuvant with levobupivacaine., Aims: This study aims to study the effects of verapamil as adjuvant to levobupivacaine in supraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery., Methods: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologist Class I and II patients posted to undergo upper extremity surgery were divided into 2 different groups randomly. In Group A, the patients received 30 ml levobupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml normal saline and Group B patients received 30 ml levobupivacaine 0.5% plus 5 mg verapamil diluted to 2 ml normal saline for supraclavicular block. Time of request for rescue analgesia, onset and duration of sensory motor blocks and changes in hemodynamic parameters were studied and analyzed. P < 0.001 was considered statistically significant., Results: Time for a request for rescue analgesia was 425.80 ± 90.46 min in Group B and 366.13 ± 70.42 min in Group A which was clinically significant. The mean of sensory and motor block onset time in Group B was less than in Group A, the difference between the two groups being statistically significant ( P < 0.001). In Group A, mean duration of sensory block was 316.13 ± 91.08 min and in Group B was 375.83 ± 114.48 min, which was statistically significant ( P < 0.001)., Conclusion: The addition of verapamil as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in brachial plexus blockade delayed the requirement of rescue analgesia with decreased onset time and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block characteristics., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Background: Many studies are there using adjuvants such as clonidine and fentanyl with bupivacaine in the subarachnoid block for prolonging postoperative analgesia. However, literature is divided regarding the dosage and efficacy of both intrathecal adjuvants. Furthermore, these adjuvants have their own side effects. Hence, search for ideal intrathecal adjuvant between clonidine and fentanyl to bupivacaine goes on., Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl as adjuvant to bupivacaine in the subarachnoid block for lower limb orthopedic surgery., Materials and Methods: It was a prospective randomized study in which eighty patients posted for lower limb orthopedic surgery were divided into two groups of forty each. Group C - Received intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5 ml) +50 μg clonidine (diluted to 0.5 ml). Group F - Received intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5 ml) + fentanyl 25 μg (diluted to 0.5 ml). Duration of postoperative analgesia, sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were recorded and analyzed., Results: Time for first dose of rescue analgesic was delayed in Group C (510.84 ± 24.10 min) in comparison to Group F (434.95 ± 19.16 min) which was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Duration of sensory and motor block was significantly prolonged in Group C compared to Group F ( P < 0.001). Sedation was more in Group C than Group F ( P < 0.001). Other block characteristics, hemodynamic, and side effects were comparable in both groups., Conclusion: Intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine provided prolonged postoperative analgesia with more sedation in comparison to intrathecal fentanyl., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Background and Aims: Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus (SCBP) block prolongs motor and sensory blockade. However, the effect of dexamethasone (8 mg) when added to levobupivacaine has not been well studied. This study was conducted to find out analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone as adjuvant to levobupivacaine in SCBP block., Methods: Ultrasound- guided SCBP block was given to sixty patients, randomly assigned into two groups. Group S (thirty patients) received 2 mL normal saline with 25 mL levobupivacaine (0.5%) and Group D (thirty patients) received 2 mL of dexamethasone (8 mg) with 25 mL of levobupivacaine (0.5%), respectively. Time for the first rescue analgesia, number of rescue analgesics required in 24 h and different block characteristics was assessed. Chi-square test and Student's t -test were used for statistical analysis., Results: Time for request of the first rescue analgesia was 396.13 ± 109.42 min in Group S and 705.80 ± 121.46 min in Group D ( P < 0.001). The requirement for rescue analgesics was more in Group S when compared to Group D. The onset of sensory and motor block was faster in Group D when compared to Group S. The mean duration of sensory and motor block was significantly longer in Group D than Group S., Conclusion: The addition of dexamethasone to levobupivacaine in SCBP blockade prolonged time for first rescue analgesia and reduced the requirement of rescue analgesics with faster onset and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.