Search

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most common types of leukemia in adult patients. The landscape of CLL therapy has changed in the last decades with the introduction of antibody-based therapies and novel targeted agents resulting in improved outcomes., Areas Covered: This article describes the use of monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of relapsed and refractory CLL. The mechanism of action and clinical applications and safety of antibody-based therapies, both as monotherapy and in combination with other drugs, are discussed. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published in English. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles., Expert Opinion: Antibody-based therapeutic strategies have drastically changed the treatment of CLL, as they have introduced the concept of boosting immune responses against tumor cells. While immunotherapy is generally effective, some treatment failure can occur due to antigen loss, mutation, or down-regulation, and this remains the main obstacle to cure. The development of novel antibody therapies, including their combinations with targeted drugs and bispecific antibodies, might help to reduce toxicity and improve efficacy.

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is typically characterized by a poor prognosis, mainly due to the median age at diagnosis. Until recently, treatment options were limited to intensive chemotherapy (IC) for young patients or hypomethylating agents for those ineligible for IC. Since 2017, nine molecules were registered for newly-diagnosed AML: midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, CPX-351, glasdegib, and venetoclax., Areas Covered: The review examines the safety profile of these drugs and their interactions with other agents used in supportive care. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles in English concerning new agents in AML from 2017 until 2023. Further relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the prescribing information and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data., Expert Opinion: The therapeutic spectrum in AML has broadened over several years and can also improve outcomes in older patients. However, in addition to their well-known cytotoxic activity, new molecules cause several unique, off-target toxicities. Also, potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) should be taken into consideration when choosing optimal first-line therapy; this remains a challenge in clinical practice.

Introduction: In the last decade, BTK inhibitors and the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax have replaced immunochemotherapy in the treatment of CLL., Areas Covered: This review describes the use of BTK inhibitors and BCL2 inhibitors in the treatment of naive and relapsed or refractory CLL, with particular attention to the mechanisms of resistance. It also addresses the management of double-refractory patients, and the discovery of novel drugs. The corpus of papers was obtained by a search of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases for articles in English., Expert Opinion: Covalent BTK inhibitors and venetoclax are commonly recommended for previously-untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL. However, resistance to both drug classes can develop over time. As such, double-refractory patients are difficult to manage and novel approaches are urgently needed.

ALPINE (NCT03734016) established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (R/R CLL/SLL); here we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n=327) or ibrutinib (n=325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (HR: 0.68 [95% CI, 0.54-0.84]), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR: 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33-0.78]) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). While median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common non-hematologic adverse events included COVID-19-related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs six cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Evidence indicates that there are significant alterations in gut microbiota diversity and composition in patients with hematological malignancies. The present study investigated the oral and intestinal microbiome in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (n=81) and age-matched healthy volunteers (HVs; n=21) using 16S ribosomal RNA next-generation sequencing. Changes in both oral and gut microbiome structures were identified, with a high abundance of Proteobacteria and depletion of Bacteroidetes in CLL as compared to HVs. Oral and stool samples of patients with CLL revealed a significant change in the abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing genera in comparison with HVs. Furthermore, the relative abundance of oral and intestine Bacteroidetes was significantly decreased in patients with CLL with negative prognostic features, including unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGHV). Notably, an increased abundance of gut Firmicutes was found to be associated with high expression of CD38. Finally, the present study suggested the log Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio as a novel intestinal microbiome signature associated with a shorter time to first treatment in individuals with CLL. The findings indicate that oral and gut microbial diversity in CLL might point to the inflammatory-related modulation of the clinical course of the disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright: © 2024 Paziewska et al.)

Abstract: This phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (TN MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until progressive disease (PD) or undue toxicity, rituximab for 6 cycles with maintenance every other cycle through cycle 24 or until PD, and venetoclax, beginning at cycle 2, for 24 cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 95.2% completed induction (6 AVR cycles) and 47.6% continued acalabrutinib maintenance. Thirteen (61.9%) patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (33.3%). Seven (33.3%) patients had COVID-19 infection (6 [28.6%] serious AEs and 5 [23.8%] deaths, all among unvaccinated patients). There was no grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, major hemorrhages, or tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% (95% CI, 83.9-100.0) with 71.4% complete response. With median follow-up of 27.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0-97.5) and 63.2% (95% CI, 34.7-82.0), respectively; both were 95% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% (95% CI, 70.7-99.3) and 75.2% (95% CI, 50.3-88.9), respectively; both were 100% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. Overall, 87.5% of patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) data achieved MRD negativity (10-6; next-generation sequencing) during treatment. AVR represents a chemotherapy-free regimen for TN MCL and resulted in high ORR and high rates of MRD negativity. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02717624., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

This multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study (ACE-LY-106) assessed the safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab (ABR) in treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until disease progression or treatment discontinuation, bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to 6 cycles, and rituximab on day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles, continuing every other cycle from cycle 8 for 12 additional doses (TN cohort). Eighteen patients enrolled in the TN and 20 in the R/R cohort. Median duration of exposure to acalabrutinib was 34.0 and 14.6 months in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. No new safety risks were identified, and most adverse events (AEs) were grades 1 or 2. Thirteen patients from the TN cohort (72.2%) and 17 patients from the R/R cohort (85.0%) reported grade 3-4 AEs, most commonly neutropenia (TN: 38.9%, R/R: 50.0%). AEs leading to death were pneumonitis (n=1, TN cohort), COVID-19, and cerebrospinal meningitis (n=1 each, R/R cohort). Overall response was 94.4% and 85.0% in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively; complete response rates were 77.8% and 70.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the TN cohort. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, median PFS was 28.6 months and OS was not reached in the R/R cohort. Results indicate that ABR was safe and efficacious, supporting further study in patients with TN MCL. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02717624.

Abstract: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression during Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor treatment is typically characterized by emergent B-cell receptor pathway mutations. Using peripheral blood samples from patients with relapsed/refractory CLL in ELEVATE-RR (NCT02477696; median 2 prior therapies), we report clonal evolution data for patients progressing on acalabrutinib or ibrutinib (median follow-up, 41 months). Paired (baseline and progression) samples were available for 47 (excluding 1 Richter) acalabrutinib-treated and 30 (excluding 6 Richter) ibrutinib-treated patients. At progression, emergent BTK mutations were observed in 31 acalabrutinib-treated (66%) and 11 ibrutinib-treated patients (37%; median variant allele fraction [VAF], 16.1% vs 15.6%, respectively). BTK C481S mutations were most common in both groups; T474I (n = 9; 8 co-occurring with C481) and the novel E41V mutation within the pleckstrin homology domain of BTK (n = 1) occurred with acalabrutinib, whereas neither mutation occurred with ibrutinib. L528W and A428D comutations presented in 1 ibrutinib-treated patient. Preexisting TP53 mutations were present in 25 acalabrutinib-treated (53.2%) and 16 ibrutinib-treated patients (53.3%) at screening. Emergent TP53 mutations occurred with acalabrutinib and ibrutinib (13% vs 7%; median VAF, 6.0% vs 37.3%, respectively). Six acalabrutinib-treated patients and 1 ibrutinib-treated patient had emergent TP53/BTK comutations. Emergent PLCG2 mutations occurred in 3 acalabrutinib-treated (6%) and 6 ibrutinib-treated patients (20%). One acalabrutinib-treated patient and 4 ibrutinib-treated patients had emergent BTK/PLCG2 comutations. Although common BTK C481 mutations were observed with both treatments, patterns of mutation and comutation frequency, mutation VAF, and uncommon BTK variants varied with acalabrutinib (T474I and E41V) and ibrutinib (L528W and A428D) in this patient population. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare indolent B-cell lymphoid malignancy. The majority of patients are asymptomatic and HCL is usually diagnosed incidentally during a routine blood cell count. In symptomatic patients, typical symptoms are related to pancytopenia and splenomegaly. In this review, we present rare clinical symptoms in patients with HCL., Methods: A literature search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar for articles concerning hairy cell leukemia, leukemia cutis, bone lesions, neurological manifestations, pulmonary symptoms, ocular manifestations, cardiac manifestation and rare symptoms. Publications from January 1980 to August 2024 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles., Results: Extramedullary and extranodal manifestations of classic HCL are rare. However, leukemic involvement in the skin, bone, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, heart, kidney, liver, lung, ocular system and other organs have been reported.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is a common leukemia characterized by clonal expansion of mature CD5+/CD23 + B cells in the blood, bone marrow (BM) and lymphoid tissues. CLL can undergo extramedullary and extranodal infiltration, with one study noting an incidence of only 0.3 per 100,000 people, and in 17.6% of CLL patients in another report. The most common extranodal sites of leukemic involvement are the skin and central nervous system; however, other organs, including liver, lungs, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, bone, prostate and heart, are occasionally involved. The prognostic significance of extra-medullary CLL is still under debate, but the prognosis in such patients seems to be better in the era of novel targeted drugs. Following a diagnosis of extranodal CLL, survival appears to depend on the site of infiltration. This review presents an overview of CLL in patients with extramedullary and extranodal leukemic lesions, focusing on its epidemiology, pathogenesis, prognosis, clinical characteristics and treatment results., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Mass spectrometry (MS) can detect multiple myeloma-derived monoclonal proteins in the peripheral blood (PB) with high sensitivity, potentially serving as a PB assay for measurable residual disease (MRD). This study evaluated the significance of PB MS MRD negativity during posttransplant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Serum samples from 138 patients treated in the phase 3 ATLAS trial of posttransplant maintenance with either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, or with lenalidomide alone were analyzed using EXENT MS methodology. We established feasibility of measuring MRD by MS in the PB in the posttransplant setting, despite unavailability of pretreatment calibration samples. There was high agreement between MRD by MS in the PB and paired bone marrow (BM) MRD results at the 10-5 threshold, assessed by either next-generation sequencing (NGS) or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (70% and 67%, respectively). Agreement between PB MS and both BM MRD methods was lowest early after transplant and increased with time. MS negativity was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), which, in landmark analysis, reached statistical significance after 18 cycles after transplant. Combined PB/BM MRD negativity by MFC or NGS was associated with superior PFS compared with MRD negativity by only 1 modality. Sustained MS negativity carried similar prognostic performance to sustained BM MRD negativity at the 10-5 threshold. Overall, posttransplant MS assessment was feasible and provided additional prognostic information to BM MRD negativity. Further studies are needed to confirm the role and optimal timing of MS in disease evaluation algorithms. The ATLAS trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02659293., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving either ibrutinib monotherapy as a first-line (1L) treatment or chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy-based (CT/CIT) regimens in 1L followed by ibrutinib in the second line (1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib) after disease progression by emulating a randomized trial comparing both treatment sequences., Methods: Patient-level data from the RESONATE-2 trial (NCT01722487) and real-world PHEDRA databases were analyzed. Three scenarios were considered using the following data sources: (1) RESONATE-2, (2) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA, (3) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA for 1L ibrutinib and PHEDRA for 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib. Propensity score-based weights and inverse probability of censoring weighting were used to adjust for baseline (Scenarios 2 and 3) and time-dependent confounding (all scenarios), and to address potential biases. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1L ibrutinib versus 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib., Results: Results from Scenario 1 showed a significantly lower risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L chlorambucil followed by 2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [95% CI 0.20-0.62]). Results from Scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrated a reduced risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [0.21-0.61] and 0.64 [0.39-1.04], respectively)., Conclusion: The analyses consistently showed a reduced risk of death when ibrutinib was used as a 1L treatment in CLL compared with delaying its use until 2L after CT/CIT regimens, which suggests that initiating ibrutinib in 1L is advantageous for improving survival outcomes.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of this therapy in patients with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia. It is crucial to develop alternative treatment methods for this patient group in order to achieve better response. This combination therapy combines two different mechanisms of action, which is promising in terms of targeting pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia. We conducted a retrospective study, which included all patients who were diagnosed with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia and received TPO-RA and rituximab at the General Hematology Department, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Poland. We assessed the response, time to response and treatment-free remission (TFR). After 1 month of treatment, the complete response (CR1, PLT >100 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients, and response (R1, PLT >30 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients. The median PLT was 175 × 10 9 /l. Within 1 month of treatment, 87.5% of patients achieved TFR. Adequately, after 6 months, CR6 and R6 was 62.5 and 75%. The median PLT was 182 × 10 9 /l. Treatment-free remission 6 months after completion was in 50% of patients. The study group achieved response to treatment, which suggests that combination of TPO-RA and rituximab is effective and relatively well tolerated. Prospective study on larger group of patients is needed to better evaluate the efficiency and safety of this treatment., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have been used for the management of human diseases since the approval of the first-in class agent, ibrutinib, by the Food and Drug Administration in 2013 for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Ibrutinib is a covalent inhibitor along with second-class BTKis: acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. These well-tolerated agents have transformed the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). A new class of these inhibitors, non-covalent, might become an answer to the emerging resistance by avoiding the sustained contact with the kinase binding domain., Areas Covered: This article examines the chemical composition, mechanism of action, metabolic characteristics, and potential toxicity of inhibitors targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase. A comprehensive search was conducted across English-language articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar., Expert Opinion: Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have greatly enhanced the armamentarium against lymphoid malignancies including CLL/SLL. Their future lies in the choice of appropriate patients who will benefit from the treatment without significant adverse reaction. Combination chemotherapy-free fixed-duration regimens with targeted molecules will allow for MRD-driven approach in patients with CLL/SLL in the near future.

Despite advances in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, drug resistance remains a clinical challenge. We aimed to develop a prognostic model for bortezomib resistance based on miRNA expression profiling. The study included 40 previously untreated MM patients receiving bortezomib-based regimens (20 treatment-sensitive, 20 resistant). Pretreatment venous blood samples were analyzed for miRNA expression. Differential expression analysis revealed upregulated miR-27b-3p (FC 1.45, p  = 0.017) and let-7b-5p (FC 1.44, p  = 0.025) in the resistant group. Univariate analysis identified let-7b-5p (OR 3.17, 95%CI: 1.19-11.4, p  = 0.04) and miR-27b-3p (OR 4.73, 95%CI: 1.4-26.6, p  = 0.036) as risk factors for resistance. The final multivariate model included miR-27b-3p (OR 23.1, 95% CI: 2.8-452, p  = 0.015), let-7b-5p (OR 4.38, 95% CI: 1.28-22.2, p  = 0.038), and miR-103a-3p (OR 15.3, 95% CI: 1.33-351, p  = 0.049). These miRNAs may serve as biomarkers of treatment response in MM. However, external validation is necessary to confirm the clinical utility of our model.

One of the most common subgroups of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas is that of primary cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders. The group includes lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL), as well as some borderline cases. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the genetics and treatment of these disorders. This review article summarises the clinical evidence supporting the current treatment options for these diseases. Recent years have seen the introduction of novel agents into clinical practice; most of these target CD30, such as anti-CD30 monoclonal antibodies and conjugated antibodies (brentuximab vedotin), bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies, particularly anti-CD30 CAR-T cells. This paper briefly reviews the biology of CD30 that makes it a good therapeutic target and describes the anti-CD30 therapies that have emerged to date.

Recent years have seen significant improvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) management. Targeting B-cell lymphoma (BCL-2) and Bruton's kinase (BTK) have become the main strategies to restrain CLL activity. These agents are generally well tolerated, but the discontinuation of these therapies happens due to resistance, adverse effects, and Richter's transformation. A growing population of patients who have previously used both BTK inhibitors and BCL2 suffer from the constriction of the following regimens. This review explores the resistance mechanisms for both ibrutinib and venetoclax. Moreover, we present innovative approaches evaluated for treating double-refractory CLL.

Background: In the GLOW study, fixed-duration ibrutinib-venetoclax showed superior progression-free survival versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who were older or had comorbidities, or both, at a median follow up of 27·7 months. In this Article, we report updated outcomes from GLOW after a 46-month median follow-up., Methods: GLOW was a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 study done at 67 hospital centres across 14 countries. Patients aged 65 years and older or 18-64 years with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and a cumulative illness rating scale score of more than 6 or creatinine clearance less than 70 mL/min, or both, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web system with permuted blocks (block size of four) and stratified by IGHV mutational status and the presence of del11q aberration to the ibrutinib-venetoclax group (three cycles of ibrutinib lead-in [420 mg/day, orally], followed by 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax [400 mg/day, orally, including a 5-week dose ramp-up]) or the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab group (six cycles of chlorambucil [0·5 mg/kg, orally, on days 1 and 15 of each cycle], and obinutuzumab [1000 mg, intravenously, on days 1 (or 100 mg on day 1 and 900 mg on day 2), 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6]). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, assessed by an independent review committee. The safety population included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03462719) and the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2017-004699-77)., Findings: Between May 4, 2018, and April 5, 2019, 211 patients (122 [58%] were male and 89 [42%] were female) were randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib-venetoclax (n=106) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (n=105). At a median of 46 months (IQR 43-47) of follow-up, progression-free survival remained superior for the ibrutinib-venetoclax group (hazard ratio 0·214 [95% CI 0·138-0·334]; p<0·0001); 42-month progression-free survival rates were 74·6% (95% CI 65·0-82·0) for ibrutinib-venetoclax and 24·8% (16·5-34·1) for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. Following the primary analysis, one patient in the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab group had a serious adverse event of myelodysplastic syndrome. Treatment-related deaths were reported in one patient receiving ibrutinib-venetoclax (cardiac failure, pneumonia, and sinus node dysfunction) and in one patient receiving chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (pneumonia). There were 15 deaths in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group (of which three were due to post-treatment infections) and 30 deaths in the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab group (of which 10 were due to post-treatment infections)., Interpretation: After 4 years of follow-up, ibrutinib-venetoclax continues to significantly prolong progression-free survival (vs chemoimmunotherapy) in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, supporting its use as a first-line option., Funding: Janssen Research & Development and Pharmacyclics., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CUN received consultancy fees and research funding from AbbVie, Janssen, Octapharma, and AstraZeneca; received research funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Danish Cancer Society, and Alfred Benzon foundation; and provided consultancy to CSL Behring, Genmab, Takeda, and BeiGene. TM served on the board of directors or advisory committee for Janssen, AstraZeneca, Alexion, AbbVie, Novartis, and Roche; and received honoraria from Janssen, AstraZeneca, Alexion, Sobi, Novartis, Roche, AbbVie, and Gilead. CM provided consultancy and served on the board of directors or advisory committee and speaker's bureau for AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and BeiGene; and received research funding from Janssen and AbbVie. CO provided consultancy and received honoraria from AbbVie and AstraZeneca; and received honoraria from Janssen, Roche, Merck, Gilead, and Servier. GAF provided consultancy and served on the speaker's bureau for Roche, AbbVie, Janssen, and Takeda; and provided consultancy for Janpix. OB provided consultancy to AbbVie, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. AJ is an employee of Genmab. M-DL received reimbursements for travel expenses from AbbVie, Roche, and Janssen. TR received honoraria from AbbVie; provided consultancy, received honoraria, and research funding from Janssen, AstraZeneca, and BeiGene; and received honoraria and research funding from Octapharma, Regeneron, and GSK. MS provided consultancy, received honoraria, served on the board of directors or advisory committee, and received travel grants from Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie. SV received honoraria from Janssen, AbbVie, and Sanofi; and provided non-financial support to clinical trials for Janssen, AbbVie, Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer. LY served on the board of directors or advisory committee and received research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, BeiGene, and BMS/Celgene. APK received research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, and Roche/Genentech; received patent royalties from Janssen and LAVA; and served on the board of directors or advisory committees for AstraZeneca, BMS, Roche/Genentech, Janssen, AbbVie, and LAVA; and received speaker's fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. KQ, QQ, LP, SS, NS, KB, and DBC are employees of Janssen or have stock ownership, or both. PS was an employee of Janssen at the time of the study. AH is an employee and equity holder of Janssen Research and Development. VV and MY declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Leukemia cutis (LC) is defined as the leukemic infiltration of the epidermis, the dermis, and the subcutaneous tissue. Leukemia cutis may follow or occur simultaneously with the diagnosis of systemic leukemia. However, cutaneous lesions are occasionally diagnosed as the primary manifestation of leukemia. Leukemic skin infiltrations demonstrate considerable variation regarding a number of changes, distribution, and morphology. The highest incidence of LC is observed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, monocytic and myelomonocytic acute myeloid leukemia, and T-cell lineage leukemia. Although the pathogenic mechanism of the invasion of leukemic cells into the skin is not well understood, chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules as well as the genetic characteristics of leukemia are thought to play a role. Leukemic skin lesions may be localized or disseminated and may occur alone or in combination on any site of the skin, most frequently in the trunk and extremities. The most common clinical presentations of leukemia cutis are papules, nodules, macules, plaques, and ulcers. In most patients, the complete or partial resolution of cutaneous infiltrations occurs simultaneously with hematologic remission. However, in patients with resistant disease or recurrent skin infiltration, local radiotherapy can be used. This review presents recent data on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of leukemic skin involvement in different types of leukemia.

Objective: Zanubrutinib is a highly selective, next-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In the phase 3 SEQUOIA trial (NCT03336333), treatment with zanubrutinib resulted in significantly improved progression-free survival compared to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in adult patients with treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) without del(17p). The current analysis compared the effects of zanubrutinib versus BR on patients' health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL)., Methods: In the SEQUOIA trial, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed at baseline and every 12 weeks (3 cycles) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L. Descriptive analyses were performed on all the questionnaires' scales and a mixed model for repeated measures was performed using the key QLQ-C30 endpoints of global health status/QoL (GHS/QoL), physical and role functioning, and symptoms of fatigue, pain, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting at weeks 12 and 24., Results: Compared with BR-treated patients, those in the zanubrutinib arm experienced greater improvements in HRQoL outcomes at both weeks 12 and 24. By week 24, mean change differences (95% confidence interval) between the arms were significant for GHS/QoL (4.9 [0.9, 9.0]), physical functioning (3.8 [0.8, 6.7]), diarrhea (-6.2 [-10.0, -2.5]), fatigue (-4.5 [-8.9, -0.1]), and nausea/vomiting (-4.5 [-8.9, -0.1]); role functioning (4.8 [-0.2, 9.7]) was marginally better in the zanubrutinib arm and there were no differences in pain symptoms (-0.4 [-4.3, 5.1]) between the arms., Conclusions: During the first 24 weeks of treatment, zanubrutinib was associated with better HRQoL outcomes in patients with treatment-naive CLL/SLL without del(17p) compared to BR., Trial Registration: The SEQUOIA trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov as SEQUOIA trial (NCT03336333).

This is the primary report of the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 BRIGHT AML 1019 clinical trial of glasdegib in combination with intensive chemotherapy (cytarabine and daunorubicin) or non-intensive chemotherapy (azacitidine) in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Overall survival (primary endpoint) was similar between the glasdegib and placebo arms in the intensive (n = 404; hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.782-1.408; two-sided p = 0.749) and non-intensive (n = 325; HR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.768-1.289; two-sided p = 0.969) studies. The proportion of patients who experienced treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for glasdegib versus placebo (intensive: 99.0% vs. 98.5%; non-intensive: 99.4% vs. 98.8%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, febrile neutropenia, and anemia in the intensive study and anemia, constipation, and nausea in the non-intensive study. The addition of glasdegib to either cytarabine and daunorubicin or azacitidine did not significantly improve overall survival and the primary efficacy endpoint for the BRIGHT AML 1019 phase 3 trial was not met. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03416179., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the new hypomethylating agent guadecitabine (n = 408) vs a preselected treatment choice (TC; n = 407) of azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit to receive intensive induction chemotherapy. Half of the patients (50%) had poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (2-3). The coprimary end points were complete remission (19% and 17% of patients for guadecitabine and TC, respectively [stratified P = .48]) and overall survival (median survival 7.1 and 8.5 months for guadecitabine and TC, respectively [hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.14; stratified log-rank P = .73]). One- and 2-year survival estimates were 37% and 18% for guadecitabine and 36% and 14% for TC, respectively. A large proportion of patients (42%) received <4 cycles of treatment in both the arms. In a post hoc analysis of patients who received ≥4 treatment cycles, guadecitabine was associated with longer median survival vs TC (15.6 vs 13.0 months [hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.96; log-rank P = .02]). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) between guadecitabine (92%) and TC (88%); however, grade ≥3 AEs of febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, and pneumonia were higher with guadecitabine. In conclusion, no significant difference was observed in the efficacy of guadecitabine and TC in the overall population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02348489., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

A diagnosis of typical chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) requires the presence of ≥5000 clonal B-lymphocytes/μL, the coexistence of CD19, CD20, CD5, and CD23, the restriction of light chain immunoglobulin, and the lack of expression of antigens CD22 and CD79b. Atypical CLL (aCLL) can be distinguished from typical CLL morphologically and immunophenotypically. Morphologically atypical CLL cells have been defined mainly as large, atypical forms, prolymphocytes, or cleaved cells. However, current aCLL diagnostics rely more on immunophenotypic characteristics rather than atypical morphology. Immunophenotypically, atypical CLL differs from classic CLL in the lack of expression of one or fewer surface antigens, most commonly CD5 and CD23, and the patient does not meet the criteria for a diagnosis of any other B-cell lymphoid malignancy. Morphologically atypical CLL has more aggressive clinical behavior and worse prognosis than classic CLL. Patients with aCLL are more likely to display markers associated with poor prognosis, including trisomy 12, unmutated IGVH , and CD38 expression, compared with classic CLL. However, no standard or commonly accepted criteria exist for differentiating aCLL from classic CLL and the clinical significance of aCLL is still under debate. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on the morphological, immunophenotypic, and genetic abnormalities of aCLL.

Introduction: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitors are a class of novel agents that are mainly used to treat B-cell malignancies. They function by inhibiting one or more enzymes which are part of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Idelalisib is a first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor effective in patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies., Areas Covered: This article reviews the chemical structure, mechanism of action, and metabolic and toxicological properties of PI3Kδ inhibitors and discusses their clinical applications in monotherapy and in combination with other agents for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles in English., Results/conclusion: PI3Kδ inhibitors hold potential for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, including CLL. However, their use is also associated with severe toxicities, including pneumonia, cytopenias, hepatitis, and rash. Newer drugs are in development to reduce toxicity with novel schedules and/or combinations., Expert Opinion: The development of novel PI3Kδ inhibitors might help to reduce toxicity and improve efficacy in patients with CLL and other B-cell lymphoid malignancies.

Purpose: In GLOW, fixed-duration ibrutinib + venetoclax showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) versus chlorambucil + obinutuzumab in older/comorbid patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The current analysis describes minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics and any potential predictive value for PFS, as it has not yet been evaluated for ibrutinib + venetoclax treatment., Methods: Undetectable MRD (uMRD) was assessed by next-generation sequencing at <1 CLL cell per 10,000 (<10 -4 ) and <1 CLL cell per 100,000 (<10 -5 ) leukocytes. PFS was analyzed by MRD status at 3 months after treatment (EOT+3)., Results: Ibrutinib + venetoclax achieved deeper uMRD (<10 -5 ) rates in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB), respectively, in 40.6% and 43.4% of patients at EOT+3 versus 7.6% and 18.1% of patients receiving chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. Of these patients, uMRD (<10 -5 ) in PB was sustained during the first year post-treatment (EOT+12) in 80.4% of patients receiving ibrutinib + venetoclax and 26.3% receiving chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. Patients with detectable MRD (dMRD; ≥10 -4 ) in PB at EOT+3 were more likely to sustain MRD levels through EOT+12 with ibrutinib + venetoclax versus chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. PFS rates at EOT+12 were high among patients treated with ibrutinib + venetoclax regardless of MRD status at EOT+3: 96.3% and 93.3% in patients with uMRD (<10 -4 ) and dMRD (≥10 -4 ) in BM, respectively, versus 83.3% and 58.7% for patients receiving chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. PFS rates at EOT+12 also remained high in patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) receiving ibrutinib + venetoclax, independent of MRD status in BM., Conclusion: Molecular and clinical relapses were less frequent during the first year post-treatment with ibrutinib + venetoclax versus chlorambucil + obinutuzumab regardless of MRD status at EOT+3 and IGHV status. Even for patients not achieving uMRD (<10 -4 ), PFS rates remained high with ibrutinib + venetoclax; this is a novel finding and requires additional follow-up to confirm its persistence over time.

Introduction: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have recently been approved for clinical use against several B-cell indolent lymphoid malignancies, both as single agents or in combination. One second-generation BTK inhibitor that is being developed for the treatment of B-cell hematological malignancies, as well as for autoimmune disorders, is orelabrutinib., Areas Covered: This paper reviews recent developments in the use of orelabrutinib against B-cell indolent lymphoid malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and central nervous system lymphoma. Google Scholar and PubMed were initially searched for articles, and the corpus of articles was broadened by reviewing the references of the identified papers. All were in English. The corpus comprised papers from 2016 to April 2023. In addition, a manual search was performed of conference proceedings from the last five years of The American Society of Hematology, American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Hematology Association., Expert Opinion: Orelabrutinib is an active drug in indolent and aggressive B-cell lymphoid malignancies. It demonstrates high selectivity, good efficacy and an excellent safety profile. Nevertheless, further clinical trials are required to optimize its use. In addition, several other highly selective BTK inhibitors are being examined in early-phase studies.

Introduction: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare subtype of indolent lymphoid leukemia originating from a mature B lymphocyte. The standard first-line treatment for classic HCL, and HCL variant (HCLv), consists of purine nucleoside analogs (PNA), with or without rituximab. However, almost half of patients relapse and require subsequent therapy., Areas Covered: This article summarizes recent achievements in the treatment of relapsed and refractory HCL. A literature search was conducted of the PubMed and MEDLINE database for articles in English. Publications from 2010 through January 2023 were scrutinized. The search terms used were hairy cell leukemia in conjunction with BRAF inhibitors, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, CD20 monoclonal antibodies, relapsed, refractory and variant.The growing understanding of HCL biology has allowed the design of several new, chemotherapy-free targeted drugs which have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in early clinical trials., Expert Opinion: Novel drugs will soon be available to assist standard therapy for HCL and HCLv among patients with suboptimal results following PNA treatment. In particular, the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib, with or without rituximab, have revolutionized treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111, Brukinsa ® , BeiGene) is a next-generation irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), developed by BeiGene in 2012 for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. It was designed to minimize off-target inhibition of TEC- and EGFR-family kinases. Zanubrutinib is more selective than ibrutinib for BTK versus EGFR, FGR, FRK, HER2, HER4, ITK, JAK3, LCK, BLK and TEC. In addition, compared to ibrutinib, zanubrutinib has improved oral absorption and better target occupancy. Zanubrutinib demonstrated a lower incidence of off-target toxicities and reduced severity than ibrutinib. Moreover, zanubrutinib is similar to acalabrutinib, with less activity against TEC and ITK. The preliminary phase 1 results suggest that zanubrutinib has clinical activity and the drug is well tolerated in patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies. Recent clinical trials have found it to demonstrate excellent efficacy and good tolerability in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In recent phase 3 studies, zanubrutinib was compared with ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MW and RR CLL. In both trials, zanubrutinib was found to demonstrate clinically meaningful advantages in safety and tolerability over ibrutinib; in particular, it was associated with a lower risk of atrial fibrillation/flutter and major bleeding events. In the recent SEQUOIA study, comparing zanubrutinib with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in patients with previously untreated CLL, zanubrutinib significantly improved progression-free survival versus BR, with an acceptable safety profile consistent with previous studies. Zanubrutinib also demonstrated good activity and tolerability in patients with R/R MCL, marginal zone lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. Trials examining the efficacy and safety of the combination of zanubrutinib with obinutuzumab venetoclax and other drugs are ongoing. This review summarizes the clinical efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in lymphoid malignancies., Competing Interests: TR has received honoraria and research funding from Acerta, AstraZeneca, Beigene, AbbVie and Janssen. AW-W has received honoraria and research funding from BeiGene and AstraZeneca. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolska-Washer and Robak.)

Purpose: Zanubrutinib is a potent, irreversible next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor designed to maximize BTK occupancy and minimize off-target kinase inhibition. We hypothesized that complete/sustained BTK occupancy may improve efficacy outcomes and increased BTK specificity may minimize off-target inhibition-related toxicities., Patients and Methods: ALPINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03734016) is a global, randomized, open-label phase III study of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). The preplanned interim analysis was scheduled approximately 12 months after the first 415 patients were enrolled., Results: Between November 1, 2018, and December 14, 2020, 652 patients were enrolled. We present the interim analysis of the first 415 enrolled patients randomly assigned to receive zanubrutinib (n = 207) or ibrutinib (n = 208). At 15 months of median follow-up, ORR (partial or complete response) was significantly higher with zanubrutinib (78.3%; 95% CI, 72.0 to 83.7) versus ibrutinib (62.5%; 95% CI, 55.5 to 69.1; two-sided P < .001). ORR was higher with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in subgroups with del(17p)/ TP53 mutations (80.5% v 50.0%) and del(11q) (83.6% v 69.1%); 12-month progression-free survival in all patients was higher with zanubrutinib (94.9%) versus ibrutinib (84.0%; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.69). Atrial fibrillation rate was significantly lower with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib (2.5% v 10.1%; two-sided P = .001). Rates of cardiac events, major hemorrhages, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation/death were lower with zanubrutinib., Conclusion: Zanubrutinib had a significantly higher ORR, lower atrial fibrillation rate, and improved progression-free survival and overall cardiac safety profile versus ibrutinib. These data support improved efficacy/safety outcomes with selective BTK inhibition.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. Despite the progress made in treatment, some MM patients still die within the first year of diagnosis. Numerous studies investigating microRNA (miRNA) expression patterns suggest they may be good prognostic markers. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the expression of selected miRNAs in the serum of MM patients who were later treated with bortezomib-based regimens, and to determine their potential to predict early mortality. The study was conducted in 70 prospectively recruited patients with newly diagnosed MM admitted to the Department of Hematology of the Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Lodz (Poland) between 2017 and 2021. Among them, 17 patients experienced death within 12 months of diagnosis. The expression of 31 selected miRNAs was determined using a miRCURY LNA miRNA Custom PCR Panel. The obtained clinical data included patient characteristics on diagnosis, treatment regimen, response to treatment, and follow-up. Differential expression analysis found two miRNAs to be significantly downregulated in the early mortality group: hsa-miR-328-3p (fold change-FC: 0.72, p = 0.0342) and hsa-miR-409-3p (FC: 0.49, p = 0.0357). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the early mortality rate. The final model consisted of hsa-miR-409-3p, hsa-miR-328-3p, age, and R-ISS 3. It yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.863 (95%CI: 0.761-0.965) with 88.2% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity. Further external validation of our model is needed to confirm its clinical value.

Background: Lenalidomide is a cornerstone of maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after autologous stem-cell transplantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone in this patient population., Methods: This study is an interim analysis of ATLAS, which is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial in 12 academic and clinical centres in the USA and Poland. Participants were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, completed any type of induction and had stable disease or better, autologous stem-cell transplantation within 100 days, initiated induction 12 months before enrolment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 and a web-based system to receive up to 36 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (28-day cycles of carfilzomib 20 mg/m 2 administered intravenously in cycle one on days 1 and 2 then 36 mg/m 2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 in cycles one to four and 36 mg/m 2 on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 from cycle five up to 36 [per protocol]; lenalidomide 25 mg administered orally on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 20 mg administered orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or lenalidomide alone (10 mg administered orally for the first three cycles and then at the best tolerated dose [≤15 mg for 28 days in 28-day cycles]) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. After 36 cycles, patients in both treatment groups received lenalidomide maintenance. Randomisation was stratified by response to previous treatment, cytogenetic risk factors, and country. Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group with no detectable minimal residual disease after cycle six (as per International Myeloma Working Group criteria) and standard-risk cytogenetics were switched to lenalidomide maintenance as of cycle nine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients). Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This unplanned interim analysis was triggered by the occurrence of 59 (61%) of the expected 96 events for the primary analysis and the results are considered preliminary. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02659293 (active, not recruiting) and EudraCT, 2015-002380-42., Findings: Between June 10, 2016, and Oct 21, 2020, 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (n=93) or lenalidomide alone (n=87; intention-to-treat population). The median age of patients was 59·0 years (IQR 49·0-63·0); 84 (47%) patients were female and 96 (53%) were male. With a median follow-up of 33·8 months (IQR 20·9-42·9), median progression-free survival was 59·1 months (95% CI 54·8-not estimable) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group versus 41·4 months (33·2-65·4) in the lenalidomide group (hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·31-0·86]; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (44 [48%] in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group vs 52 [60%] in the lenalidomide group), thrombocytopenia (12 [13%] vs six [7%]), and lower respiratory tract infections (seven [8%] vs one [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 28 (30%) patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group and 19 (22%) in the lenalidomide group. One treatment-related adverse event led to death (respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group., Interpretation: This interim analysis provides support for considering carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who completed any induction regimen followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation, which requires confirmation after longer follow-up of this ongoing phase 3 trial., Funding: Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DD reports speaker honoraria and participation in advisory boards for Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb) and had conference fees paid by Amgen. TW reports honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, BeiGene, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; conference fees or travel support (or both) from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; and advisory board participation for AbbVie, Amgen, BeiGene, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and Takeda. KJ reports grants paid to his institution and payment for expert testimony from Janssen; honoraria from Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sandoz, and Takeda; financial support for attending meetings or travel support (or both) from Amgen, Celgene, and Janssen; and consulting and advisory board participation for Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Janssen, Sandoz, and Takeda. TK reports honoraria from AbbVie and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb) and financial support for attending meetings or travel support (or both) from Sanofi. AD-S reports honoraria for presentations and lectures from Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb); and financial support for attending meetings or travel support (or both) and advisory board participation from Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb). KrG reports honoraria from Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb). AN reports fees for lectures and presentations from Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), and Janssen; and financial support for attending meetings or travel support (or both) from Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Janssen, and Teva. BP reports grants or contracts from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), and Janssen; consultation fees from AbbVie, Roche, and Sandoz; honoraria for lectures and presentations from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), and Janssen; and financial support for attending meetings or travel support (or both) from AbbVie and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb). JR reports speaker honoraria and advisory board participation from Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), and Janssen. LU-Z reports financial support for attending meetings or travel support (or both) from Janssen. AK reports payment for clinical trial participation from Janssen. JMZ reports grants from Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb); financial support for attending meetings or travel support (or both) from AbbVie and Takeda; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Roche, and Takeda. JW reports personal and institutional grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Roche; and personal consulting, lecture and presentation fees, speaker bureaus, and educational events fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. DM reports lecture and presentation fees from Amgen and Janssen. TR reports research grants from Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb). OBL reports participation on an advisory board for MorphoSys. JAZ reports an institutional grant from Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb); personal consulting fees from Alnylam, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Janssen, Prothena, and Regeneron; and participation on an advisory board for Takeda. KeG reports personal payment for the statistical design of this study and consulting fees related to other studies from the University of Chicago. BAD reports consulting fees from COTA Healthcare, Janssen, and Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from MJH Life Sciences and Plexus Communications. AJJ reports consulting fees and honoraria for lectures and presentations from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb), Gracell, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Sanofi-Aventis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In a multinational, phase 3, head-to-head trial, ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was compared with zanubrutinib, a BTK inhibitor with greater specificity, as treatment for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In prespecified interim analyses, zanubrutinib was superior to ibrutinib with respect to overall response (the primary end point). Data from the final analysis of progression-free survival are now available., Methods: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL who had received at least one previous course of therapy to receive zanubrutinib or ibrutinib until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. In this final analysis, progression-free survival (a key secondary end point) was assessed with the use of a hierarchical testing strategy to determine whether zanubrutinib was noninferior to ibrutinib. If noninferiority was established, the superiority of zanubrutinib was assessed and claimed if the two-sided P value was less than 0.05., Results: At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, zanubrutinib was found to be superior to ibrutinib with respect to progression-free survival among 652 patients (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, [CI], 0.49 to 0.86; P = 0.002), as assessed by the investigators; the results were similar to those as assessed by an independent-review committee. At 24 months, the investigator-assessed rates of progression-free survival were 78.4% in the zanubrutinib group and 65.9% in the ibrutinib group. Among patients with a 17p deletion, a TP53 mutation, or both, those who received zanubrutinib had longer progression-free survival than those who received ibrutinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.88); progression-free survival across other major subgroups consistently favored zanubrutinib. The percentage of patients with an overall response was higher in the zanubrutinib group than in the ibrutinib group. The safety profile of zanubrutinib was better than that of ibrutinib, with fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and fewer cardiac events, including fewer cardiac events leading to treatment discontinuation or death., Conclusions: In patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL, progression-free survival was significantly longer among patients who received zanubrutinib than among those who received ibrutinib, and zanubrutinib was associated with fewer cardiac adverse events. (Funded by BeiGene; ALPINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03734016.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

What Is This Summary About?: This is a plain language summary of a publication describing long-term results from the RESONATE-2 study with up to 8 years of follow-up. The original paper was published in Blood Advances in June 2022., What Were the Results?: Researchers looked at 269 adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who had not received any treatment for their CLL/SLL. Study participants were randomly divided into two groups: 136 participants received treatment with a drug called ibrutinib, and 133 participants received treatment with a drug called chlorambucil. Participants in the study were treated and followed for up to 8 years, with results showing that more participants who took ibrutinib (59%) were alive without worsening of their disease at 7 years after starting treatment than participants who took chlorambucil (9%). Almost half of the participants (42%) were able to stay on ibrutinib treatment for up to 8 years., What Do the Results of the Study Mean?: In people with CLL or SLL, more participants who were taking ibrutinib were alive without worsening of their disease after 7 years compared with participants who took chlorambucil. Clinical Trial Registration : NCT01722487 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Clinical Trial Registration : NCT01724346 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Introduction: The systemic inflammation index (SII) might serve as an indicator of the equilibrium between the inflammatory and immune responses. The aim of the study was to determine the clinical value and prognostic significance of SII in the cohort of multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with a regimen of pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd)., Material and Methods: This retrospective, real-life study included patients who received a Pd regimen in our centre between November 2018 and July 2022. The systemic inflammation index was calculated from peripheral blood counts of platelets, neutrophils, and lymphocytes collected shortly before commencement of Pd treatment using the equation: SII = N × P/L, where N, P, and L are the respective counts per litre of peripheral blood for neutrophils, platelets, and lymphocytes., Results: The study group consisted of 54 patients. Most patients received Pd as the third (38.9%) or fourth (37.0%) line of treatment. The median number of completed treatment cycles was 5 (IQR: 1-12). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months and overall survival (OS) 14.8 months. High SII (> 374) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.4-6.3, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.0-4.6, p = 0.04). In the low SII group, the respective median PFS and OS values were 9.6 and 21.7 months, compared to 2.6 ( p = 0.018) and 5.5 months ( p = 0.035) in the high SII group., Conclusions: The systemic inflammation index has prognostic significance in MM patients treated with Pd. A high SII predicts a poorer outcome in pretreated MM patients undergoing Pd treatment evaluation. As such, it may well be a key factor for guiding subsequent treatment decisions., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Termedia.)

In the last few years, BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax have been approved for clinical use against chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), both as single agents, and in combination. This article summarizes recent achievements in the treatment of patients with CLL, and pays special attention to novel targeted drugs and monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). A literature search was conducted of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Rituximab and obinutuzumab have been combined with chemotherapy, and more recently, with BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax. These agents have demonstrated high activity in treatment naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL. Immunochemotherapy regimens are currently considered in TN younger patients with IGHV -mutated disease and should not be given in patients without IGHV mutation. BTK inhibitors are more commonly used as monotherapy in TN and RR patients. PI3K inhibitors can be combined with CD20 Mabs, but their use in CLL is limited due to safety concerns. Venetoclax is typically combined with anti-CD20 Mabs in CLL. Generally, the optimal sequencing of therapies remains to be established, and the selection of upfront therapy needs to be tailored to the individual patient.

This is the first large-scale cross-country analysis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) aimed to evaluate the incidence, types, and key prognostic factors of secondary malignancies, and to assess the impact on overall survival based on retrospective claims data from three Central European countries. We analyzed 25,814 newly diagnosed CLL patients from Czechia, Hungary, and Poland; 10,312 (39.9%) patients were treated for CLL in study periods between 2004 and 2016. Out of the treated patients, 1986 (19.3%) received the FCR therapy in the first line and 779 (7.6%) received FCR in subsequent lines. We observed that 33.7% of treated patients developed secondary malignancies during the study. Based on country estimates, the probability to develop a secondary malignancy within 4 years since starting the first-line FCR therapy ranged between 28.0% and 36.8%. We found the age at diagnosis, male gender, any malignancy prior to the CLL diagnosis, and the CLL treatment to be the key risk factors for developing secondary malignancies. Specifically, the FCR therapy was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) prognostic factor for risk increase with the hazard ratio between 1.46 and 1.60. Across the three Central European countries, we observed consistent results indicating FCR increased the risk of secondary malignancies in CLL patients. We conclude that secondary malignancies are clearly an undervalued burden for CLL patients, caregivers, and the healthcare system. When evaluating new therapies in regulatory and reimbursement decision making, the factor of secondary malignancies deserves deeper considerations., (© 2022 Janssen Pharmaceutica NV. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by many cytogenetic and molecular alterations. Due to better knowledge of the molecular basis of AML, many targeted therapies have been introduced and registered, e.g. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation inhibitors, and Bcl-2 inhibitor. Despite that, the cure for AML remains an unmet clinical need in most patients., Areas Covered: The review aims to present new, not yet registered drugs for AML. We searched the English literature for articles concerning AML, targeted drugs, menin inhibitors, DOT1L, BET, IDH inhibitors, FLT3, hedgehog inhibitors, Polo-like kinase inhibitors, RNA splicing, and immune therapies via PubMed. Publications from January 2000 to August 2022 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles and Google search. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of The American Society of Hematology, the European Hematology Association, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references., Expert Opinion: For several years, the therapeutic approach in AML has become more individualized. Novel groups of drugs give hope for greater curability. High response rates have agents that restore the activity of the p53 protein. In addition, agents that work independently of a particular mutation seem promising for AML without any known mutation.

A significant body of literature has been generated related to the detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the time of achieving complete remission (CR) in patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL). However, due to the indolent nature of the disease as well as reports suggesting long-term survival in patients treated with a single course of a nucleoside analog albeit without evidence of cure, the merits of detection of MRD and attempts to eradicate it have been debated. Studies utilizing novel strategies in the relapse setting have demonstrated the utility of achieving CR with undetectable MRD (uMRD) in prolonging the duration of remission. Several assays including immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow specimens, multi-parameter flow cytometry and molecular assays to detect the mutant BRAF V600E gene or the consensus primer for the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGH) rearrangement have been utilized with few comparative studies. Here we provide a consensus report on the available data, the potential merits of MRD assessment in the front-line and relapse settings and recommendations on future role of MRD assessment in HCL., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder, comprising only 2% of all leukemias. The Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation (HCLF) has developed a patient data registry to enable investigators to better study the clinical features, treatment outcomes, and complications of patients with HCL. This system utilizes a centralized registry architecture. Patients are enrolled at HCL Centers of Excellence (COE) or via a web-based portal. All data are de-identified, which reduces regulatory burden and increases opportunities for data access and re-use. To date, 579 patients have been enrolled in the registry. Efforts are underway to engage additional COE's to expand access to patients across the globe. This international PDR will enable researchers to study outcomes in HCL in ways not previously possible due to the rarity of the disease and will serve as a platform for future prospective research.

Cardiac involvement of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is recognized extremely rarely. In addition, most CLL/SLL patients with heart infiltration are asymptomatic. In this review, we present the results of a literature search for English language articles concerning CLL/SLL or Richter transformation with symptomatic cardiac involvement. In total, 18 well-described cases with CLL/SLL and heart infiltration were identified. Only three patients were not diagnosed with CLL/SLL before the cardiac manifestation. In other patients, cardiac CLL/SLL was diagnosed between 5 months and 20 years from CLL/SLL diagnosis. All patients in these series had a diagnosis of secondary cardiac CLL/SLL. In addition, we identified four reported cases with Richter transformation in the heart. The treatment of patients with CLL/SLL and cardiac infiltration is variable and depends on the previous history and clinical characteristics of heart infiltration. In addition, no recommendations exist on how to treat patients with CLL/SLL and cardiac involvement.