Search

SPR720 is a phosphate ester prodrug that is converted rapidly in vivo to SPR719, the active moiety, which exhibits potent in vitro activity against clinically relevant mycobacterial species including Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus . SPR720 is in clinical development for the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) due to MAC. This study evaluated the safety and the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of SPR719 in healthy volunteers. A total of 30 subjects received oral SPR720 1,000 mg once daily for 7 days followed by bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage, with blood samples collected for plasma pharmacokinetic assessments. Mean SPR719 area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC 0-24 ) and maximum concentration ( C max ) for plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophages (AM) were 52,418 ng·h/mL and 4,315 ng/mL, 59,880 ng·h/mL and 5,429 ng/mL, and 128,105 ng·h/mL and 13,033 ng/mL, respectively. The ratios of ELF to total plasma concentrations of SPR719 based on AUC 0-24 and C max were 1.14 and 1.26, and the ratios of AM to total plasma concentrations of SPR719 based on AUC 0-24 and C max were 2.44 and 3.02, respectively. When corrected for protein binding, the ratios of ELF to unbound plasma concentrations of SPR719 for AUC 0-24 were 42.50 and 52.53, respectively. No unexpected safety findings were observed. Results from this study of the intrapulmonary disposition of SPR719 support further investigation of SPR720 as a potential oral agent for the treatment of patients with NTM-PD.This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05955586.C max were 19.87 and 21.88, and the ratios of AM to unbound plasma concentrations of SPR719 for AUC 0-24 and C max were 42.50 and 52.53, respectively. No unexpected safety findings were observed. Results from this study of the intrapulmonary disposition of SPR719 support further investigation of SPR720 as a potential oral agent for the treatment of patients with NTM-PD.This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05955586., Competing Interests: K.A.R. and M.H.G. were consultants to Spero Therapeutics, Inc. X.T.U., S.L.W., and K.A.H. are employees of Spero Therapeutics, Inc.

Addressing the treatment and prevention of antibacterial-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections is a priority area of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG). The ARLG has conducted a series of observational studies to define the clinical and molecular global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant and ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, with the goal of optimizing the design and execution of interventional studies. One ongoing ARLG study aims to better understand the impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative gut bacteria in neutropenic patients, which threatens to undermine the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in these vulnerable patients. The ARLG has conducted pharmacokinetic studies to inform the optimal dosing of antibiotics that are important in the treatment of drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, including oral fosfomycin, intravenous minocycline, and a combination of intravenous ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. In addition, randomized clinical trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of step-down oral fosfomycin for complicated urinary tract infections and single-dose intravenous phage therapy for adult patients with cystic fibrosis who are chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa in their respiratory tract. Thus, the focus of investigation in the ARLG has evolved from improving understanding of drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections to positively affecting clinical care for affected patients through a combination of interventional pharmacokinetic and clinical studies, a focus that will be maintained moving forward., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors report funding support from the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID; grant UM1AI104681). M. J. S. reports grants or contracts from Merck, bioMérieux, SNIPRBiome, and Selux Diagnostics; consulting fees from Shionogi; and participation on a data safety monitoring board (DSMB) for AbbVie. D. v. D. reports grants or contracts from Merck; consulting fees from Utility, Shionogi, Merck, Union, Roche, and Qpex; payment or honoraria from Pfizer, Entasis, and Clinical Care Options; participation on an advisory board for Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; and leadership in the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. K. A. R. reports royalties from Springer Nature Group (textbook royalties); consulting fees, outside the submitted work, as an advisory board member for Shionogi, Qpex Biopharma/Medicines, and Utility Therapeutics and a consultant for Pulmatrix, BugsResearch, Clinartis, Spero Therapeutics, Qpex Biopharma/Medicines, Genetech, Utility Therapeutics, Venatorx, Chimerix, and Debiopharm; payment or honoraria from Shionogi (speaker bureau) and Biri Bioscience (presentation/speaker); participation on a DSMB, outside the submitted work, for Janssen Pharmaceutical; voting membership on the National Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Committee for the United States; and membership in the Antimicrobial Stewardship Curriculum Workgroup of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. N. R. reports grants or contracts from Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, Quidel, and Lilly; consulting fees from Krog; payment or honoraria from Virology Education; travel support from Sanofi; participation on a DSMB or advisory board for Moderna, Sanofi, EMMES, ICON, and Seqirus; advisory roles with the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group, Tropical Medicine Research Center (TMRC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Pertussis Challenge; an associate editor role with Clinical Infectious Diseases; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from the Georgia Research Alliance. S. R. E. reports grants from the NIAID, the NIH and De Gruyter (as editor-in-chief for Statistical Communications in Infectious Diseases), the National Cancer Institute/NIH, and the CDC; royalties from Taylor & Francis; consulting fees from Genentech, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Microbiotix, Johnson & Johnson, Endologix, ChemoCentryx, Becton Dickinson, Atricure, Roviant, Neovasc, Nobel Pharma, Horizon, International Drug Development Institute, SVB Leerink, Medtronic, Regeneron, Wake Forest University, Recor, Janssen, and IDDI; payments from Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION); meeting support from the US Food and Drug Administration, Deming Conference on Applied Statistics, Clinical Trial Transformation Initiative, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, the International Chinese Statistical Association Applied Statistics Symposium, and the Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship Conference; and board member participation for the NIH, the Breast International Group, the University of Pennsylvania, Washington University, Duke University, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, Akouos, Apellis, Teva, Vir, DayOneBio, Alexion, Tracon, Rakuten, AbbVie, GSK, Eli Lilly, Nuvelution, Clover, FHI Clinical, Lung Biotech, SAB Biopharm, Advantagene, Candel, Novartis, the American Statistical Association, the Society for Clinical Trials, and the Frontier Science Foundation. V. G. F. reports personal consulting fees from Novartis, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, The Medicines Company, MedImmune, Bayer, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, ContraFect, Regeneron, Destiny, Amphliphi Biosciences, Integrated Biotherapeutics, C3J, Armata, Valanbio, Akagera, Aridis, Roche, and Pfizer (all paid to author); grants from the NIH, MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck, Medical Biosurfaces, Locus, Affinergy, ContraFect, Karius, Genentech, Regeneron, Deep Blue, Basilea, and Janssen; royalties from UpToDate; stock options from Valanbio and ArcBio; honoraria from the Infectious Diseases Society of America for service as associate editor of Clinical Infectious Diseases; travel support from ContraFect to 2019 ECCMID; and a sepsis diagnostics patent pending. T. H. reports consulting fees from Tanabe-Mitsubishi Pharma and honoraria from Duke University and Cancer and Chemo Therapy. R. P. reports grants or contracts from ContraFect, TenNor Therapeutics Limited, BIOFIRE, and Adaptive Phage Therapeutics; a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics through the Mayo Clinic; consulting fees from PhAST, Torus Biosystems, Day Zero Diagnostics, Mammoth Biosciences, HealthTrackRx, Netflix, Abbott Laboratories, Trellis Bioscience, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, and CARB-X; honoraria from the NBME, Up-to-Date, and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course; a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis polymerase chain reaction issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication (with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic), and a patent on an antibiofilm substance issued; and a financial relationship with Pathogenomix through the Mayo Clinic. N. S. reports grant funding from Duke University, the NIH, and the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group. R. A. B. reports grants and contracts from VenatoRx, Wockhardt, and Merck; payments from Pfizer to moderate meeting sessions; a provisional patent with Case Western Reserve University on the development of boronic acid transition state inhibitors for β-lactamases; and participation on a DSMB as a logistics associate for DMID-CROMS, Safety Oversight Committee Support, and Technical Resources International. Y. D. reports grants from Entasis and Shionogi; consulting fees from GSK, Moderna, Meiji Seika Pharma, Shionogi, Gilead, FujiFilm, and bioMérieux; and speaker payments from MSD, Shionogi, and Gilead. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

SPR206 is a next-generation polymyxin being developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections. This Phase 1 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) study was conducted to evaluate SPR206's safety and pharmacokinetics in plasma, pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophages (AM) in healthy volunteers. Subjects received a 100 mg intravenous (IV) dose of SPR206 infused over 1 h every 8 h for 3 consecutive doses. Each subject underwent 1 bronchoscopy with BAL at 2, 3, 4, 6, or 8 h after the start of the third IV infusion. SPR206 concentrations in plasma, BAL, and cell pellet were measured with a validated LC-MS/MS assay. Thirty-four subjects completed the study and 30 completed bronchoscopies. Mean SPR206 peak concentrations ( Cmax ) in plasma, ELF, and AM were 4395.0, 735.5, and 860.6 ng/mL, respectively. Mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC 0-8 ) for SPR206 in plasma, ELF, and AM was 20120.7, 4859.8, and 6026.4 ng*h/mL, respectively. The mean ELF to unbound plasma concentration ratio was 0.264, and mean AM to unbound plasma concentration ratio was 0.328. Mean SPR206 concentrations in ELF achieved lung exposures above the MIC for target Gram-negative pathogens for the entire 8-h dosing interval. Overall, SPR206 was well tolerated; 22 subjects (64.7%) reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Of the 40 reported TEAEs, 34 (85.0%) were reported as mild in severity. The most frequent TEAEs were oral paresthesia (10 subjects [29.4%]) and nausea (2 subjects [5.9%]). This study demonstrates pulmonary penetration of SPR206 and supports further development of SPR206 for the treatment of patients with serious infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is an oral carbapenem prodrug being developed for the treatment of serious bacterial infections. The active moiety, tebipenem, has broad-spectrum activity against common Enterobacterales pathogens, including extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing multidrug-resistant strains. This study evaluated the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of tebipenem relative to plasma levels in nonsmoking, healthy adult subjects. Thirty subjects received oral TBP-PI-HBr at 600 mg every 8 h for five doses. Serial blood samples were collected following the last dose. Each subject underwent one standardized bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 h after the fifth dose of TBP-PI-HBr. The tebipenem area under the concentration-time curve for the 8-h dosing interval (AUC 0-8 ) values in plasma, ELF, and AMs were calculated using the mean concentration at each BAL sampling time. Ratios of AUC 0-8 values for total ELF and AMs to those for unbound plasma were determined, using a plasma protein binding value of 42%. Mean values ± standard deviations (SD) of tebipenem maximum ( C max ) and minimum ( C min ) total plasma concentrations were 11.37 ± 3.87 mg/L and 0.043 ± 0.039 mg/L, respectively. Peak tebipenem concentrations in plasma, ELF, and AMs occurred at 1 h and then decreased over 8 h. Ratios of tebipenem AUC 0-8 values for ELF and AMs to those for unbound plasma were 0.191 and 0.047, respectively. Four (13.3%) subjects experienced adverse events (diarrhea, fatigue, papule, and coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]); all resolved, and none were severe or serious. Tebipenem is distributed into the lungs of healthy adults, which supports the further evaluation of TBP-PI-HBr for the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04710407.).

Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is an oral carbapenem prodrug antimicrobial agent with broad-spectrum activity that includes multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales . This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TBP-PI-HBr in healthy subjects with normal renal function (cohort 1) and subjects with various degrees of renal impairment (RI [cohorts 2 to 4]) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis (HD) (cohort 5). Subjects in cohorts 1 to 4 received a single oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr (600 mg). Subjects in cohort 5 received single-dose administration (600 mg) in 2 separate periods: pre-HD (period 2) and post-HD (period 1). Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for TBP, the active moiety, were determined using noncompartmental analysis. Compared with cohort 1, the TBP plasma area under the curve (AUC) increased 1.4- to 4.5-fold among cohorts 2 to 4, the maximum concentration of drug in plasma ( C max ) increased up to 1.3-fold and renal clearance (CL R ) decreased from 13.4 L/h to 2.4 L/h as the severity of RI increased. Plasma TBP concentrations decreased over 8 to 12 h in cohorts 1 to 4, and apparent total body clearance (CL/F) correlated ( R 2 ) versus cohort 1. After 4 h of HD, mean TBP plasma exposure decreased by approximately 40%. Overall, TBP plasma exposure increased with increasing RI, highlighting the renal route importance in TBP elimination. A dose reduction of TBP-PI-HBr may be needed in patients with RI (CL CR ). TBP urinary excretion ranged from 38% to 64% of the administered dose for cohorts 1 to 4. Subjects in cohort 5 had an approximately 7-fold increase in TBP AUC and elimination half-life ( t 1/2 ) versus cohort 1. After 4 h of HD, mean TBP plasma exposure decreased by approximately 40%. Overall, TBP plasma exposure increased with increasing RI, highlighting the renal route importance in TBP elimination. A dose reduction of TBP-PI-HBr may be needed in patients with RI (CL CR of ≤50 mL/min) and those with ESRD on HD. TBP-PI-HBr was well tolerated across all cohorts. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04178577.).

A comprehensive review of drug penetration into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was previously published in 2011. Since then, an extensive number of studies comparing plasma and ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents have been published and are summarized in this review. The majority of the studies included in this review determined ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents using bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage, and this review focuses on intrapulmonary penetration ratios determined with area under the concentration-time curve from healthy human adult studies or pharmacokinetic modeling of various antibacterial agents. If available, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters determined from preclinical murine infection models that evaluated ELF concentrations are also provided. There are also a limited number of recently published investigations of intrapulmonary penetration in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections, where greater variability in ELF concentrations may exist. The significance of these changes may impact the intrapulmonary penetration in the setting of infection, and further studies relating ELF concentrations to clinical response are needed. Phase I drug development programs now include assessment of initial pharmacodynamic target values for pertinent organisms in animal models, followed by evaluation of antibacterial penetration into the human lung to assist in dosage selection for clinical trials in infected patients. The recent focus has been on β-lactam agents, including those in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors, particularly due to the rise of multidrug-resistant infections. This manifests as a large portion of the review focusing on cephalosporins and carbapenems, with or without β-lactamase inhibitors, in both healthy adult subjects and critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Further studies are warranted in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the relationship between intrapulmonary penetration and clinical and microbiological outcomes. Our clinical research experience with these studies, along with this literature review, has allowed us to outline key steps in developing and evaluating dosage regimens to treat extracellular bacteria in lower respiratory tract infections., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objectives: Lung penetration of cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin approved for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, has previously been evaluated in healthy subjects. This study assessed the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of cefiderocol at steady state in hospitalized, mechanically ventilated pneumonia patients., Methods: Patients received cefiderocol 2 g (or ≤1.5 g if renally impaired), administered IV q8h as a 3 h infusion, or 2 g q6h if patients had augmented renal function (estimated CLCR > 120 mL/min). After multiple doses, each patient underwent a single bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedure either at the end of the infusion or at 2 h after the end of infusion. Plasma samples were collected at 1, 3, 5 and 7 h after the start of infusion. After correcting for BAL dilution, cefiderocol concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for each patient and the ELF/unbound plasma concentration ratio (RC, E/P) were calculated. Safety was assessed up to 7 days after the last cefiderocol dose., Results: Seven patients received cefiderocol. Geometric mean ELF concentration of cefiderocol was 7.63 mg/L at the end of infusion and 10.40 mg/L at 2 h after the end of infusion. RC, E/P was 0.212 at the end of infusion and 0.547 at 2 h after the end of infusion, suggesting delayed lung distribution. There were no adverse drug reactions., Conclusions: The results suggest that cefiderocol penetrates the ELF in critically ill pneumonia patients with concentrations that are sufficient to treat Gram-negative bacteria with an MIC of ≤4 mg/L., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Recent clinical data on vancomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics suggest a reevaluation of current dosing and monitoring recommendations. The previous 2009 vancomycin consensus guidelines recommend trough monitoring as a surrogate marker for the target area under the curve over 24 hours to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC). However, recent data suggest that trough monitoring is associated with higher nephrotoxicity. This document is an executive summary of the new vancomycin consensus guidelines for vancomycin dosing and monitoring. It was developed by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists vancomycin consensus guidelines committee. These consensus guidelines recommend an AUC/MIC ratio of 400-600 mg*hour/L (assuming a broth microdilution MIC of 1 mg/L) to achieve clinical efficacy and ensure safety for patients being treated for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic (antibacterial). Omadacycline has had chemical structure modifications at the C9 and C7 positions of the core tetracycline rings that allow stability in the efflux pump and ribosomal protection protein mechanisms of tetracycline resistance. The systemic exposure (i.e., maximum plasma concentrations [C max ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) after intravenous (IV) administration were linear and predictable over the dose range of 25 and 600 mg in healthy subjects. The oral bioavailability of omadacycline was 34.5% under fasted conditions (no food intake 6 h before and 4 h after dosing). Both AUC and C max values significantly decreased (41-61%) when a high-fat meal, with and without dairy, were administered 2 h before oral dosing of omadacycline. Similar to other tetracyclines, it is advisable to avoid concurrent administration of divalent- or trivalent cation-containing products (e.g., antacids and iron-containing preparations) for at least 4 h after oral administration of omadacycline. Omadacycline has a large volume of distribution (190 L) and low plasma protein binding (21.3%) that was concentration independent. Systemic exposure of omadacycline in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages was greater than in plasma in healthy adult subjects. Omadacycline is excreted unchanged in the feces (81.1%) and urine (14.4%), and has a low potential for drug-drug interactions since it was not a substrate, inhibitor, or inducer of major cytochrome-metabolizing enzymes or organic anion transporters (OATs). No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of omadacycline have been observed for age, sex, and renal or hepatic impairment. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies have confirmed that the AUC from time zero to 24 h (AUC 24 )/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio was the best index for correlating unbound plasma and total-drug ELF concentrations with the efficacy of omadacycline. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with data from healthy subjects and infected patients and used to establish interpretive criteria for in vitro susceptibility testing and dosing regimens of omadacycline for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Background: Recent vancomycin PK/PD and toxicodynamic studies enable a reassessment of the current dosing and monitoring guideline in an attempt to further optimize the efficacy and safety of vancomycin therapy. The area-under-the-curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) has been identified as the most appropriate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target for vancomycin. The 2009 vancomycin consenus guidelines recommended specific trough concentrations as a surrogate marker for AUC/MIC. However, more recent toxicodynamic studies have reported an increase in nephrotoxicity associated with trough monitoring., Methods and Results: This is the executive summary of the new vancomycin consensus guidelines for dosing and monitoring vancomycin therapy and was developed by the American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacists, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists vancomycin consensus guidelines committee., Conclusions: The recommendations provided in this document are intended to assist the clinician in optimizing vancomycin for the treatment of invasive MRSA infections in adult and pediatric patients. An AUC/MIC by broth microdilution (BMD) ratio of 400 to 600 (assuming MICBMD of 1 mg/L) should be advocated as the target to achieve clinical efficacy while improving patient safety for patients with serious MRSA infections. In such cases, AUC-guided dosing and monitoring is the most accurate and optimal way to manage vancomycin therapy., (© 2020 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

The polymyxins are important agents for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint recommendations for colistin and polymyxin B are that isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Acinetobacter baumannii , and Enterobacteriaceae are considered susceptible at MIC values of ≤2 mg/liter. These recommendations are contingent upon dosing and testing strategies that are described in this commentary. Importantly, these recommendations are not applicable to lower respiratory tract infections, for which we recommend no breakpoints. Furthermore, there is no breakpoint recommendation for polymyxin B for lower urinary tract infections., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.)

Oral and intravenous (IV) omadacycline formulations are approved in the United States for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults. Oral omadacycline bioavailability is 34.5%; similar exposures are obtained following 300 mg oral and 100 mg IV doses. Oral administration should be in a fasted state, with dairy products, antacids, or multivitamins avoided for ≥4 hours after dosing. Low protein binding (21%), large volume of distribution (190 L), low systemic clearance (10 L/hour), and long elimination half-life (16-17 hours) support once-daily dosing. Omadacycline is excreted unchanged in feces (81.1%) and urine (14.4%), with low potential for drug-drug interactions. Dose adjustments are unnecessary for age, sex, and renal or hepatic impairment. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies identify fAUC0-24/MIC ratio as the parameter that correlates with in vivo efficacy. Systemic exposure of omadacycline in epithelial lining fluid is greater than/equal to plasma concentrations in healthy adults., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Tetracyclines have come a long way since they became available almost seven decades ago, with numerous enhancements allowing new agents to overcome bacterial mechanisms of resistance. However, these enhancements come with toxicities and pharmacokinetic disadvantages such as the gastrointestinal side-effects and poor oral bioavailability seen with the glycylcylcines. Omadacycline, a new and improved tetracycline, has demonstrated a broad spectrum of in vitro activity, has oral and intravenous formulations, improved safety compared to glycylcyclines, as well as clinical efficacy and safety for two types of infections: acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. This review will summarize salient points about its pharmacologic properties, available clinical efficacy, and safety data and omadacycline's place in therapy., Competing Interests: Dr Rodvold is a consultant for Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and reports personal fees from Paratek Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: The need for antimicrobial therapies effective against multidrug resistant organisms for children remains unmet. Tigecycline shows antibacterial activity across a broad spectrum of bacteria and is approved for treating complicated skin and skin-structure infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections and, in the United States, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia for adult patients. No blinded, randomized phase 3 tigecycline clinical trials on neonates or children have been completed or planned. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of all the existing data sources, both on-label and off-label, for tigecycline use in children., Methods: Data on tigecycline use in children were identified from published and unpublished sources including clinical trials, expanded access and compassionate use programs, databases of healthcare records and patient safety monitoring., Results: Pharmacokinetic simulations predicted that tigecycline 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose 50 mg) every 12 hours (q12h) in children 8-11 years and 50 mg q12h in children 12 to <18 years would achieve exposure similar to adults receiving 50 mg q12h. Available phase 2 pediatric clinical trial data and data from other sources demonstrated similar clinical efficacy between adult and pediatric patients treated with tigecycline. These data showed no new or unexpected safety concerns with tigecycline in children., Conclusions: Information presented here may help guide the appropriate use of tigecycline in children with multidrug resistant infections. Continued pharmacovigilance from real-world observational studies may also further refine appropriate use of tigecycline.

Background: Infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, have increased in frequency, resulting in significant patient morbidity and mortality. The Infectious Diseases Society of America continues to propose legislative, regulatory, and funding solutions to address this escalating crisis. This report updates the status of development and approval of systemic antibiotics in the United States as of late 2018., Methods: We performed a review of the published literature and on-line clinical trials registry at www.clinicaltrials.gov to identify new systemically acting orally and/or intravenously administered antibiotic drug candidates in the development pipeline, as well as agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 2012., Results: Since our 2013 pipeline status report, the number of new antibiotics annually approved for marketing in the United States has reversed its previous decline, likely influenced by new financial incentives and increased regulatory flexibility. Although our survey demonstrates progress in development of new antibacterial drugs that target infections caused by resistant bacterial pathogens, the majority of recently approved agents have been modifications of existing chemical classes of antibiotics, rather than new chemical classes. Furthermore, larger pharmaceutical companies continue to abandon the field, and smaller companies face financial difficulties as a consequence., Conclusions: Unfortunately, if 20 × '20 is achieved due to efforts embarked upon in decades past, it could mark the apex of antibiotic drug development for years to come. Without increased regulatory, governmental, industry, and scientific support and collaboration, durable solutions to the clinical, regulatory, and economic problems posed by bacterial multidrug resistance will not be found., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Antibiotic renal dose adjustments are determined in patients with stable chronic kidney disease and may not translate to patients in late-phase trials and practice. Ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and telavancin all carry precautionary statements for reduced clinical response in patients with baseline creatinine clearance of 30-50 mL/min, potentially due to unnecessary dose reduction in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI). In this review, we discuss the regulatory landscape for antibiotics eliminated by the kidney and highlight the importance of the first 48 hours of therapy. Using a clinical database, we identified AKI on admission in a substantial proportion of patients with pneumonia (27.1%), intraabdominal (19.5%), urinary tract (20.0%), or skin and skin structure infections (9.7%) that resolved by 48 hours in 57.2% of cases. We suggest that deferred renal dose reduction of wide therapeutic index antibiotics could improve outcomes in patients with infectious diseases., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Fosfomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic available since the 1970s whose intravenous formulation has been available in many countries outside the USA. Given the rise in drug-resistant bacteria, its introduction into the US market has become a necessity for addressing these organisms. This review provides an overview of the microbiology, clinical pharmacology and initial clinical experiences of the intravenous fosfomycin product (ZTI-01) that is undergoing clinical development in the USA for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis.

Lefamulin is the first semisynthetic pleuromutilin being developed for oral and intravenous administration. The drug selectively inhibits prokaryotic ribosomal protein synthesis by binding to the peptidyl transferase centre via four H-bonds and other interactions, resulting in an 'induced fit' that tightens the binding pocket around lefamulin. This unique mechanism of action has been associated with a low probability of cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes commonly used to treat community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). This Supplement, entitled 'Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses and dose rationale for lefamulin, a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic, for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia', is intended to be a valuable resource for both clinicians and researchers. It provides the essential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on lefamulin that were used to support the optimal dose selection of lefamulin for the safe and effective treatment of CABP in adults., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

ETX2514 is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor that broadly inhibits Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. ETX2514 combined with sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores sulbactam activity against Acinetobacter baumannii ETX2514-sulbactam (ETX2514SUL) is under development for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. The objective of this study was to determine and compare plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations following intravenous (i.v.) ETX2514 and sulbactam. Plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of ETX2514 and sulbactam were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in 30 healthy adult subjects following repeated dosing (ETX2514 [1 g] and sulbactam [1 g] every 6 h [q6h], as a 3-h i.v. infusion, for a total of 3 doses). A bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed once in each subject at either 1, 2.5, 3.25, 4, or 6 h after the start of the last infusion. Penetration ratios were calculated from area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 h (AUC 0-6 ) values for total plasma and ELF using mean and median concentrations at the BAL fluid sampling times. Respective ELF AUC 0-6 values, based on mean and median concentrations, were 40.1 and 39.4 mg · h/liter for ETX2514 and 34.7 and 34.5 mg · h/liter for sulbactam. Respective penetration ratios of ELF to total/unbound plasma concentrations, based on mean and median AUC 0-6 values, of ETX2514 were 0.37/0.41 and 0.36/0.40, whereas these same ratio values were 0.50/0.81 and 0.50/0.80 for sulbactam. ETX2514 and sulbactam concentrations in AM were measurable and fairly constant throughout the dosing interval (median values of 1.31 and 1.01 mg/liter, respectively). These data support further study of ETX2514SUL for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03303924.)., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

Introduction: Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) represents the first carbapenem and β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. Vaborbactam is a novel boronic acid, β-lactamase inhibitor with a high affinity for serine β-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). This combination, Vabomere™, was approved in August 2017 by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cUTIs in patients 18 years or older, including pyelonephritis, caused by the following susceptible microorganisms: Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae species complex. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability will be discussed. Expert opinion: Current treatment options for KPC-producing infections such as aminoglycosides, polymyxins, fosfomycin, and tigecycline are associated with concerns regarding efficacy, toxicities, optimal dosing, and/or development of resistance. Additionally, resistance to the new combination product of ceftazidime/avibactam has also emerged. Current clinical evidence supporting the use of M/V for KPC-producing infections is limited to an open-label, randomized, phase III study in a small number of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Although M/V is not approved for KPC-producing infections, we believe that M/V will become a preferred agent for KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of two repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated in 18 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received 3 g every other day (QOD) for 3 doses and then every day (QD) for 7 doses, or vice versa, in a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period-crossover study. Serial blood ( n = 11) and urine ( n = 4 collection intervals) samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 5, along with predose concentrations on days 3 and 7. PK parameters were similar between days 1 and 5 within and between dosing regimens. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) PK parameters for fosfomycin in plasma on day 5 during the respective QOD and QD dosing regimens were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum ( C max ) = 24.4 ± 6.2 versus 23.8 ± 5.6 μg/ml, time to C max ( T max ) = 2.2 ± 0.7 versus 2.0 ± 0.4 h, apparent volume of distribution ( V / F ) = 141 ± 67.9 versus 147 ± 67.6 liters, apparent clearance (CL/ F ) = 21.4 ± 8.0 versus 20.4 ± 5.3 liters/h, renal clearance (CL R ) = 7.5 ± 4.1 versus 7.3 ± 3.5 liters/h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC 0-24 ) = 151.6 ± 35.6 versus 156.6 ± 42.5 μg · h/ml, and elimination half-life ( t 1/2 ) = 4.5 ± 1.1 versus 5.0 ± 1.7 h. Urine concentrations peaked at approximately 600 μg/ml through the 0- to 8-h urine collection intervals but displayed significant interindividual variability. Roughly 35 to 40% of the 3-g dose was excreted in the urine by 24 h postdose. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The proportion of diarrhea-free days during the study was significantly lower with the QD regimen than with the QOD regimen (61% versus 77%; P < 0.0001). Further studies to establish the clinical benefit/risk ratio for repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine are warranted. (This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02570074.)., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

WCK 5222 is a combination of cefepime and the novel β-lactam enhancer zidebactam being developed for the treatment of serious Gram-negative bacterial infections. The objective of this study was to compare plasma (total), epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of cefepime and zidebactam in healthy adult subjects. The WCK 5222 dosing regimen was 2 g cefepime/1 g zidebactam administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 8 h for a total of 7 doses. Subjects were assigned to one bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling time at 0.5, 1.25, 3, 6, 8, or 10 h after the seventh dose. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from serial plasma concentrations collected over 8-hour and 10-hour intervals following the first and seventh doses, respectively. Penetration ratios were calculated from the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC 0-8 ) for plasma, ELF, and AM using mean and median concentrations at each BAL sampling time. The plasma maximum concentration of drug ( C max ) and AUC values of cefepime and zidebactam increased by 8% to 9% after the seventh versus the first dose of WCK 5222. The respective AUC 0-8 values based on mean concentrations of cefepime and zidebactam in ELF were 127.9 and 52.0 mg · h/liter, and 87.9 and 13.2 mg · h/liter in AM. The ELF to total plasma penetration ratios of cefepime and zidebactam based on mean AUC 0-8 values were 0.39 and 0.38, respectively. The AM to total plasma ratios were 0.27 and 0.10, respectively. The observed plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of cefepime and zidebactam support studies of WCK 5222 for treatment of pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

A recommended total-body-weight (TBW) dosing strategy for telavancin may not be optimal in obese patients. The primary objective of this study was to characterize and compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of telavancin across four body size groups: normal to overweight and obese classes I, II, and III. Healthy adult subjects ( n = 32) received a single, weight-stratified, fixed dose of 500 mg ( n = 4), 750 mg ( n = 8), or 1,000 mg ( n = 20) of telavancin. Noncompartmental PK analyses revealed that subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥40 kg/m 2 had a higher volume of distribution (16.24 ± 2.7 liters) than subjects with a BMI of <30 kg/m 2 (11.71 ± 2.6 liters). The observed area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ) ranged from 338.1 to 867.3 mg · h/liter, with the lowest exposures being in subjects who received 500 mg. AUC 0-∞ values were similar among obese subjects who received 1,000 mg. A two-compartment population PK model best described the plasma concentration-time profile of telavancin when adjusted body weight (ABW) was included as a predictive covariate. Fixed doses of 750 mg and 1,000 mg had similar target attainment probabilities for efficacy as doses of 10 mg/kg of body weight based on ABW and TBW, respectively. However, the probability of achieving a target area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h of ≥763 mg · h/liter in association with acute kidney injury was highest (19.7%) with TBW-simulated dosing and lowest (0.4%) at the 750-mg dose. These results suggest that a fixed dose of 750 mg is a safe and effective alternative to telavancin doses based on TBW or ABW for the treatment of obese patients with normal renal function and Staphylococcus aureus infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02753855.)., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

Alalevonadifloxacin (WCK 2349) is a novel l-alanine ester prodrug of levonadifloxacin that is being developed as an oral fluoroquinolone antibiotic. The primary objective of this study was to determine and compare plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of levonadifloxacin following oral administration of alalevonadifloxacin to healthy adult subjects. Levonadifloxacin concentrations in plasma, ELF, and AM samples from 30 healthy subjects were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) following oral dosing of alalevonadifloxacin (1,000 mg twice daily for 5 days). Six subjects were assigned to each bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid sampling time, i.e., 2, 4, 6, 8, or 12 h after the ninth oral dose. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined from serial total plasma concentrations collected over a 12-h interval following the first and ninth oral doses. Penetration ratios were calculated from the areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 12 h (AUC 0-12 ) for plasma, ELF, and AM by using mean (and median) concentrations at each BAL sampling time. Unbound plasma concentrations (∼85% plasma protein binding) were used to determine site-to-plasma penetration ratios. Plasma PK parameter values for levonadifloxacin were similar after the first and ninth doses. The respective AUC 0-12 values based on mean ELF and AM concentrations were 172.6 and 35.3 mg · h/liter, respectively. The penetration ratios for ELF and AM levonadifloxacin concentrations to unbound plasma levonadifloxacin concentrations were 7.66 and 1.58, respectively. Similar penetration ratios were observed with median concentrations. The observed plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of levonadifloxacin support further studies of alalevonadifloxacin for treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02253342.)., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and microdialysis have become the most reliable and relevant methods for measuring lung concentrations of antibiotics, with the majority of BAL studies involving either healthy adult subjects or patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy. Emphasis on the amount of drug that reaches the site of infection is increasingly recognized as necessary to determine whether a dose selection will translate to good clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients with pneumonia. Observed concentrations and/or parameters of exposure (e.g. area-under-the-curve) need to be incorporated with pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic indices so that rational dose selection can be identified for specific pathogens and types of pneumonic infection (community-acquired vs hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia). Although having measured plasma or lung concentration-time data from critically ill patients to incorporate into pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models is very unlikely during drug development, it is essential that altered distribution, augmented renal clearance, and renal or hepatic dysfunction should be considered. Notably, the number of published studies involving microdialysis and intrapulmonary penetration of antibiotics has been limited and mainly involve beta-lactam agents, levofloxacin, and fosfomycin. Opportunities to measure in high-resolution effect site spatial pharmacokinetics (e.g. with MALDI-MSI or PET imaging) and in vivo continuous drug concentrations (e.g. with aptamer-based probes) now exist. Going forward these studies could be incorporated into antibiotic development programs for pneumonia in order to further increase the probability of candidate success., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The steady-state concentrations of omadacycline and tigecycline in the plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar cells (AC) of 58 healthy adult subjects were obtained. Subjects were administered either omadacycline at 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h for two doses followed by 100 mg i.v. every 24 h for three doses or tigecycline at an initial dose of 100 mg i.v. followed by 50 mg i.v. every 12 h for six doses. A bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed once in each subject following the start of the fifth dose of omadacycline at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h and after the start of the seventh dose of tigecycline at 2, 4, 6, or 12 h. The value of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 h postdosing (AUC 0-24 ) (based on mean concentrations) in ELF and the ratio of the ELF to total plasma omadacycline concentration based on AUC 0-24 values were 17.23 mg · h/liter and 1.47, respectively. The AUC 0-24 value in AC was 302.46 mg · h/liter, and the ratio of the AC to total plasma omadacycline concentration was 25.8. In comparison, the values of the AUC from time zero to 12 h postdosing (AUC 0-12 ) based on the mean concentrations of tigecycline in ELF and AC were 3.16 and 38.50 mg · h/liter, respectively. The ratio of the ELF and AC to total plasma concentrations of tigecycline based on AUC 0-12 values were 1.71 and 20.8, respectively. The pharmacokinetic advantages of higher and sustained concentrations of omadacycline compared to those of tigecycline in plasma, ELF, and AC suggest that omadacycline is a promising antibacterial agent for the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens., (Copyright © 2017 Gotfried et al.)

The nafithromycin concentrations in the plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophages (AM) of 37 healthy adult subjects were measured following repeated dosing of oral nafithromycin at 800 mg once daily for 3 days. The values of noncompartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined from serial plasma samples collected over a 24-h interval following the first and third oral doses. Each subject underwent one standardized bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, or 48 h after the third dose of nafithromycin. The mean ± standard deviation values of the plasma PK parameters after the first and third doses included maximum plasma concentrations ( C max ) of 1.02 ± 0.31 μg/ml and 1.39 ± 0.36 μg/ml, respectively; times to C max of 3.97 ± 1.30 h and 3.69 ± 1.28 h, respectively; clearances of 67.3 ± 21.3 liters/h and 52.4 ± 18.5 liters/h, respectively, and elimination half-lives of 7.7 ± 1.1 h and 9.1 ± 1.7 h, respectively. The values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 h postdosing (AUC 0-24 ) for nafithromycin based on the mean or median total plasma concentrations at BAL fluid sampling times were 16.2 μg · h/ml. For ELF, the respective AUC 0-24 values based on the mean and median concentrations were 13.8 and 10.9, respectively, whereas the ratios of the AM to total plasma concentrations based on the mean and median concentrations were 527 and 364, respectively. The sustained ELF and AM concentrations for 48 h after the third dose suggest that nafithromycin has the potential to be a useful agent for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02453529.).0-24 values were 8,538 and 5,894 μg · h/ml. Penetration ratios based on ELF and total plasma AUC 0-24 values based on the mean and median concentrations were 13.8 and 10.9, respectively, whereas the ratios of the AM to total plasma concentrations based on the mean and median concentrations were 527 and 364, respectively. The sustained ELF and AM concentrations for 48 h after the third dose suggest that nafithromycin has the potential to be a useful agent for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02453529.)., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.)

Ceftazidime-avibactam administered at 1.25 g every 8 h was used to treat multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in a critically ill patient on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Prefiltration plasma drug concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam were measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h along with postfiltration and ultrafiltrate concentrations at h 2 and h 6. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftazidime and avibactam, respectively, were as follows: maximum plasma concentration ( C max ), 61.10 and 14.54 mg/liter; minimum plasma concentration ( C min ), 31.96 and 8.45 mg/liter; half-life ( t 1/2 ), 6.07 and 6.78 h; apparent volume of distribution at the steady state ( V ss ), 27.23 and 30.81 liters; total clearance at the steady state (CL ss ), 2.87 and 2.95 liters/h; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC 0-8 ), 347.87 and 85.69 mg · h/liter. Concentrations of ceftazidime in plasma exceeded the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC (6 mg/liter) throughout the 8-h dosing interval. Mean CVVH extraction ratios for ceftazidime and avibactam were 14.44% and 11.53%, respectively, and mean sieving coefficients were 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. The calculated mean clearance of ceftazidime by CVVH was 1.64 liters/h and for avibactam was 1.59 liters/h, representing 57.1% of the total clearance of ceftazidime and 54.3% of the total clearance of avibactam. Further data that include multiple patients and dialysis modes are needed to verify the optimal ceftazidime-avibactam dosing strategy during critical illness and CVVH., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.)

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while decreasing in overall incidence, is still a prominent concern world-wide. New agents coming to market in the last 10 years allow practitioners to optimize treatment for MRSA infections. Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin agent with MRSA activity, currently approved in selected countries for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials will be discussed. Expert opinion: Ceftobiprole is an addition to a growing number of antimicrobials with activity against MRSA. Concern for appropriate dosing in critically ill patients remains due to its ineffectiveness for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). While ceftobiprole has activity against gram-negative organisms, the allowance for use of an additional agent for gram-negative infections in clinical trials limits recommendations for monotherapy for empirical treatment of HAP. Ceftobiprole's place in therapy will lie in its activity against gram positive organisms, such as Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.

The steady-state concentrations of meropenem and the β-lactamase inhibitor RPX7009 in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations were obtained in 25 healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects. Subjects received a fixed combination of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) administered every 8 h, as a 3-h intravenous infusion, for a total of three doses. A bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed once in each subject at 1.5, 3.25, 4, 6, or 8 h after the start of the last infusion. Meropenem and RPX7009 achieved a similar time course and magnitude of concentrations in plasma and ELF. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters ± the standard deviations of meropenem and RPX7009 determined from serial plasma concentrations were as follows: Cmax = 58.2 ± 10.8 and 59.0 ± 8.4 μg/ml, Vss = 16.3 ± 2.6 and 17.6 ± 2.6 liters; CL = 11.1 ± 2.1 and 10.1 ± 1.9 liters/h, and t1/2 = 1.03 ± 0.15 and 1.27 ± 0.21 h, respectively. The intrapulmonary penetrations of meropenem and RPX7009 were ca. 63 and 53%, respectively, based on the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) values of ELF and total plasma concentrations. When unbound plasma concentrations were considered, ELF penetrations were 65 and 79% for meropenem and RPX7009, respectively. Meropenem concentrations in AMs were below the quantitative limit of detection, whereas median concentrations of RPX7009 in AMs ranged from 2.35 to 6.94 μg/ml. The results from the present study lend support to exploring a fixed combination of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by meropenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens susceptible to the combination of meropenem-RPX7009., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of USL261, a midazolam formulation optimized for intranasal delivery, versus midazolam intravenous (IV) solution administered intranasally (MDZ-inj IN) or intravenously (MDZ-inj IV) in healthy adults., Methods: In this phase 1, five-way crossover, open-label study, 25 healthy adults (aged 18-42 years) were randomly assigned to receive 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 mg USL261; 2.5 mg MDZ-inj IV; and 5.0 mg MDZ-inj IN. Blood samples were collected for 12 h post dose to determine pharmacokinetic profiles. Pharmacodynamic assessments of sedation and psychomotor impairment also were conducted. Adverse events, oxygen saturation, and vital signs were recorded., Results: Increasing USL261 dose corresponded with increases in midazolam area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ), with all doses demonstrating rapid median time to Cmax (Tmax ; 10-12 min). USL261 also demonstrated increased absorption, with a 134% relative bioavailability, compared with the same MDZ-inj IN dose. USL261 was associated with dose-dependent increases in sedation and psychomotor impairment (p < 0.05); however, these effects lasted <4 h and generally did not differ from MDZ-inj IN or MDZ-inj IV at comparable doses. No serious adverse events (SAEs) or deaths were reported, and no treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to study discontinuation., Significance: Compared with intranasal delivery of a midazolam formulation intended for IV delivery, USL261, optimized for intranasal administration demonstrated improved bioavailability with similar pharmacodynamic effects. Therefore, USL261 may be a preferable alternative to the currently approved rectal diazepam treatment for intermittent bouts of increased seizure activity., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Telavancin (TD-6424) was discovered in 2000 and became the first marketed semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide in 2009. This parenteral antibacterial agent has a dual mechanism of action and potent in vitro activity against gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses support the concentration-dependent activity and once-daily dosing regimen of telavancin. A changing regulatory approval process, manufacturing obstacles, and the termination of a commercialization partnership have challenged the development and marketing of telavancin. The commercial operations for telavancin have been restored, a new manufacturer has been secured, and reliable product supplies are available for clinical use. In addition, telavancin continues to be supported by ongoing clinical research with the recent launch of the Telavancin Observational Use Registry (TOUR; NCT02288234) in the United States and an international phase 3, randomized trial comparing telavancin with standard therapy for the treatment of patients with complicated S. aureus bacteremia, including endocarditis (NCT02208063)., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The pharmacokinetic profile of ceftaroline has not been well characterized in obese adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in 32 healthy adult volunteers aged 18 to 50 years in the normal, overweight, and obese body size ranges. Subjects were evenly assigned to 1 of 4 groups based on their body mass index (BMI) and total body weight (TBW) (ranges, 22.1 to 63.5 kg/m(2) and 50.1 to 179.5 kg, respectively). Subjects in the lower-TBW groups were matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and serum creatinine to the upper-BMI groups. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected over 12 h after the start of the infusion, and the concentrations of ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug), ceftaroline, and ceftaroline M-1 (inactive metabolite) were assayed. Noncompartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses were used to evaluate the data. The mean plasma ceftaroline maximum concentration and area under the curve were ca. 30% lower in subjects with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m(2) compared to those <30 kg/m(2). A five-compartment pharmacokinetic model with zero-order infusion and first-order elimination optimally described the plasma concentration-time profiles of the prodrug and ceftaroline. Estimated creatinine clearance (eCLCR) and TBW best explained ceftaroline clearance and volume of distribution, respectively. Although lower ceftaroline plasma concentrations were observed in obese subjects, Monte Carlo simulations suggest the probability of target attainment is ≥90% when the MIC is ≤1 μg/ml irrespective of TBW or eCLCR. No dosage adjustment for ceftaroline appears to be necessary based on TBW alone in adults with comparable eCLCR. Confirmation of these findings in infected obese patients is necessary to validate these findings in healthy volunteers. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01648127.)., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Introduction: Ceftaroline fosamil is a 5th generation cephalosporin with an in vitro spectrum of activity including Streptococcus agalactiae, penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella oxytoca, K. pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis. It is currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults., Areas Covered: This review covers the mechanism of action; bacterial resistance; pharmacokinetic characteristics in various patient populations; pharmacodynamic data in animal and in vitro models as well as human studies; efficacy observed in clinical trials for ABSSSI and CABP; and adverse effects., Expert Opinion: Ceftaroline provides in vitro bactericidal activity against methicillin-, vancomycin-, daptomycin-, and linezolid-resistant Gram-positive organisms and select Gram-negative pathogens. The pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline is similar to other β-lactam agents. Ceftaroline exhibits a favorable adverse effect profile and is generally well tolerated. There is little data on clinical success of ceftaroline in patients with bacteremia or endocarditis other than what has been published in a small series of case reports. Randomized-control studies are needed to establish clinical outcomes and safety in these patient populations.

Telavancin is a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide with a dual mechanism of action against Gram-positive pathogens. Two brief reports have suggested potential cross-reactivity of telavancin with the vancomycin particle-enhanced turbidometric immunoassay (PETIA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate several commercially available vancomycin immunoassays (fluorescence polarization [FPIA], enzyme-multiplied immunoassays [EMIT], PETIA, and chemiluminescent immunoassay [CMIA]) for cross-reactivity with telavancin. Seven sites were selected to analyze serum samples for vancomycin. Each site received a set of samples (n = 18) which combined drug-free serum with telavancin, 7-OH telavancin metabolite, or vancomycin. Immunoassays demonstrating potential cross-reactivity were further evaluated by sending a duplicate sample set to multiple laboratories. Cross-reactivity was defined as the percent theoretical concentration (reported concentration/theoretical concentration × 100). No cross-reactivity was seen with FPIA or EMIT. Within the theoretical concentration range of 5 to 120 μg/ml of telavancin, the Synchron PETIA system reported vancomycin concentrations ranging from 4.7 to 54.2 μg/ml compared to vancomycin concentrations from 1.1 to 5.6 μg/ml for the Vista PETIA system. The Architect CMIA system reported vancomycin concentrations in the range of 0.27 to 0.97 μg/ml, whereas Advia Centaur XP CMIA reported vancomycin concentrations between 1.6 and 31.6 μg/ml. The Architect CMIA immunoassay had the lowest percent cross-reactivity (0.8 to 5.4%), while the Synchron PETIA immunoassay demonstrated the highest percent cross-reactivity (45.2 to 53.8%). Telavancin samples measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy were within 93.9 to 122% of theoretical concentrations. Vancomycin concentrations were not measured in any 7-OH telavancin-spiked sample. Vancomycin concentrations measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy were within 57.2 to 113% of theoretical concentrations. PETIA and CMIA measured vancomycin concentrations in telavancin-spiked samples. Significant variability in percent cross-reactivity was observed for each platform regardless of immunoassay method., (Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

The delivery of personalized antimicrobial therapy is a critical component in the treatment of patients with invasive infections. Vancomycin, the drug of choice for infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, requires the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for delivery of optimal therapy. Current guidance on vancomycin TDM includes the measurement of a trough concentration as a surrogate for achieving an AUC to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by broth microdilution (AUC/MICBMD) ratio≥400. Although trough-only monitoring has been widely integrated into clinical practice, there is a high degree of inter-individual variability between a measured trough concentration and the actual AUC value. The therapeutic discordance between AUC and trough may lead to suboptimal outcomes among patients with infections due to less susceptible pathogens or unnecessarily increase the probability of acute kidney injury (AKI) in others. Given the potentially narrow vancomycin AUC range for optimal effect and minimal AKI, clinicians need a "real-time" system to predict accurately the AUC with limited pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling. This article reviews two innovative approaches for calculating the vancomycin AUC in clinical practice based on one or two drug concentrations. One such approach involves the use of Bayesian computer software programs to estimate the "true" vancomycin AUC value with minimal PK sampling and provide AUC-guided dosing recommendations at the bedside. An alternative involves use of two concentrations (peak and trough) and simple analytic equations to estimate AUC values. Both approaches provide considerable improvements over the current trough-only concentration monitoring method., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) is tasked with developing a clinical research agenda and conducting clinical studies to address the growing public health threat of antibacterial resistance. The ARLG has identified 4 high-priority areas of research: infections caused by gram-negative bacteria, infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention, and diagnostics. The ARLG will be accepting proposals from the scientific community for clinical research that addresses 1 or more of these high-priority areas. These studies should have the potential to transform medical practice and be unlikely to occur without ARLG support. The purpose of this article is to make interested parties aware of clinical research opportunities made available by ARLG and to encourage submission of clinical research proposals that address the problem of antibacterial resistance.

Background and Objectives: Labetalol is frequently prescribed for the treatment of hypertension during pregnancy; however, the influence of pregnancy on labetalol pharmacokinetics is uncertain, with inconsistent findings reported by previous studies. This study examined the population pharmacokinetics of oral labetalol during and after pregnancy in women receiving labetalol for hypertension., Methods: Data were collected from 57 women receiving the drug for hypertension from the 12th week of pregnancy through 12 weeks postpartum using a prospective, longitudinal design. A sparse sampling strategy guided collection of plasma samples. Samples were assayed for labetalol by high-performance liquid chromatography. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters and covariate effects was performed by nonlinear mixed effects modeling using NONMEM. The final population model was validated by bootstrap analysis and visual predictive check. Simulations were performed with the final model to evaluate the appropriate body weight to guide labetalol dosing., Results: Lean body weight (LBW) and gestational age, i.e. weeks of pregnancy, were identified as significantly influencing oral clearance (CL/F) of labetalol, with CL/F ranging from 1.4-fold greater than postpartum values at 12 weeks' gestational age to 1.6-fold greater at 40 weeks. Doses adjusted for LBW provide more consistent drug exposure than doses adjusted for total body weight. The apparent volumes of distribution for the central compartment and at steady-state were 1.9-fold higher during pregnancy., Conclusions: Gestational age and LBW impact the pharmacokinetics of labetalol during pregnancy and have clinical implications for adjusting labetalol doses in these women.

Initial dose selection of antimicrobials typically involves the clinical integration of covariates of drug disposition such as age, sex, weight, and kidney function. However, dynamic clinical states and unaccountable confounders necessitate our measurement of systemic concentrations in an individual patient to better inform dose modification. Over the past 50 years, several research groups have formulated weight- and kidney function-based dosing algorithms to measure, assess, and optimize the dosing of aminoglycosides. The lessons learned from older aminoglycosides may be useful and have applications to newer antimicrobials that are dosed on weight and kidney function. This is especially true among obese patients, for whom optimal dosing algorithms have not been well defined. The purpose of this review is to provide healthcare providers a historical perspective of aminoglycoside therapeutic drug monitoring followed by an updated approach to improve dosing of these agents in obese adult patients., (© 2013.)

The current vancomycin therapeutic guidelines recommend the use of only trough concentrations to manage the dosing of adults with Staphylococcus aureus infections. Both vancomycin efficacy and toxicity are likely to be related to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). We assembled richly sampled vancomycin pharmacokinetic data from three studies comprising 47 adults with various levels of renal function. With Pmetrics, the nonparametric population modeling package for R, we compared AUCs estimated from models derived from trough-only and peak-trough depleted versions of the full data set and characterized the relationship between the vancomycin trough concentration and AUC. The trough-only and peak-trough depleted data sets underestimated the true AUCs compared to the full model by a mean (95% confidence interval) of 23% (11 to 33%; P = 0.0001) and 14% (7 to 19%; P < 0.0001), respectively. In contrast, using the full model as a Bayesian prior with trough-only data allowed 97% (93 to 102%; P = 0.23) accurate AUC estimation. On the basis of 5,000 profiles simulated from the full model, among adults with normal renal function and a therapeutic AUC of ≥400 mg · h/liter for an organism for which the vancomycin MIC is 1 mg/liter, approximately 60% are expected to have a trough concentration below the suggested minimum target of 15 mg/liter for serious infections, which could result in needlessly increased doses and a risk of toxicity. Our data indicate that adjustment of vancomycin doses on the basis of trough concentrations without a Bayesian tool results in poor achievement of maximally safe and effective drug exposures in plasma and that many adults can have an adequate vancomycin AUC with a trough concentration of <15 mg/liter.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Vancomycin was the "gold standard" of treatment for serious MRSA infections; however, the emergence of less-susceptible strains, poor clinical outcomes, and increased nephrotoxicity with high-dose therapy are challenging its current role as first-line therapy. Linezolid is recommended for PO or IV treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) and pneumonia caused by MRSA. Daptomycin (IV) should be considered in patients with MRSA bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis as well as in complicated SSSIs, but should not be used to treat MRSA pneumonia. Tigecycline and telavancin are alternative (IV) treatments for SSSIs caused by MRSA; however, safety concerns have limited use of these agents. Ceftaroline is the newest of the approved parenteral agents for SSSIs caused by MRSA. Several investigational agents with activity against drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens are being developed primarily for treatment of MRSA infections, including tedizolid, dalbavancin, and oritavancin.