Graf C, D'Ambrosio R, Degasperi E, Paolucci S, Llaneras J, Vermehren J, Dultz G, Peiffer KH, Finkelmeier F, Herrmann E, Zeuzem S, Buti M, Lampertico P, Dietz J, and Sarrazin C
Background & Aims: Voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) is highly effective for re-treatment of direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-experienced patients with chronic HCV infection. In the present study, predictors of virologic treatment response were analyzed in an integrative analysis of three large real-world cohorts., Methods: Consecutive patients re-treated with VOX/VEL/SOF after DAA failure were enrolled between 2016 and 2021 in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain and Switzerland., Results: A total of 746 patients were included: median age was 56 (16-88) years and 77% were male. Most patients were infected with HCV genotype 1 (56%) and 3 (32%). 86% of patients carried resistance-associated substitutions in the NS3, NS5A or NS5B regions. Overall, 95.4% (683/716) of patients achieved a sustained virologic response. Treatment effectiveness was significantly affected by advanced liver disease ( p < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma ( p < 0.001), higher baseline ALT levels ( p = 0.02), HCV genotype 3 ( p < 0.001), and prior VEL/SOF treatment ( p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, only HCV genotype 3, hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis turned out to be independent predictors of treatment failure. Resistance-associated substitutions, as well as the presence of rare genotypes, did not impact treatment outcome. The effectiveness of rescue therapy with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and SOF, with or without ribavirin, for 12 to 24 weeks was found to be high (100%)., Conclusions: Infection with HCV genotype 3, the presence of liver cancer and cirrhosis are independently associated with failure of VOX/VEL/SOF re-treatment. It is unclear whether the addition of ribavirin and/or extension of treatment duration may be effective to avoid virologic relapse on VOX/VEL/SOF. However, rescue treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF seems to be effective., Impact and Implications: Representative data on the effectiveness of voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) in clinical practice are still scarce and the collection of a larger number of patients with difficult-to-treat cofactors including the assessment of resistance-associated substitution profiles is required before more specific recommendations for optimal re-treatment in these patients can be given. Thus, we aimed to analyze treatment effectiveness and predictors of virologic response to VOX/VEL/SOF in an integrative analysis of three large real-word cohorts. The study results, derived from a multicenter cohort consisting of 746 patients, demonstrated that re-treatment with VOX/VEL/SOF is an effective salvage therapy associated with an overall per protocol sustained virologic response rate of 95%. Hepatocellular carcinoma onset, cirrhosis and HCV genotype 3 were identified as independent negative predictors of treatment response, whereas resistance-associated substitutions, as well as rare genotypes and chimera, did not impact sustained virologic response rates following re-treatment with VOX/VEL/SOF., Competing Interests: Christiana Graf reports speaking and/or consulting fees from AbbVie and travel support from AbbVie and Gilead outside the submitted work. Roberta D’Ambrosio reports speaking and/consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead and Takeda and research grant from AbbVie and Gilead outside the submitted work. Elisabetta Degasperi reports speaking and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead, MSD; research grants from Gilead and travel support from AbbVie outside the submitted work. Stefania Paolucci: no conflicts to disclose.Jordi Llaneras: no conflicts to disclose. Johannes Vermehren reports speaking and/or consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers, Squibb, Gilead, Medtronic, Merck/MSD and Roche outside the submitted work. Georg Dultz reports speaking and/or consulting fees from AbbVie and Gilead outside the submitted work. Kai-Henrik Peiffer: no conflicts to disclose. Fabian Finkelmeier: no conflicts to disclose. Eva Herrmann: no conflicts to disclose. Stefan Zeuzem reports speaking and/or consulting fees from Abbvie, BioMarin, Gilead, GSK, Ipsen, Janssen, Madrigal, Merck/MSD, NovoNordisk, SoBi, and Theratechnologies outside the submitted work. Maria Buti reports speaking and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, MSD and Gilead outside the submitted work. Pietro Lampertico reports speaking and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, MSD and Roche outside the submitted work. Julia Dietz reports research grants from Gilead outside the submitted work. Christoph Sarrazin reports speaking and consulting fees from Abbvie, MSD, Gilead, Merck/MSD and research support from AbbVie and Gilead outside the submitted work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).)