Search

Rationale: Zolpidem, a non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic, is considered safer for the treatment of insomnia compared to benzodiazepines. However, in recent years, there have been growing reports of Zolpidem dependence, addiction, and withdrawal symptoms. We reported a case of Zolpidem addiction and successful detoxification, reviewed similar cases in the literature, and proposed a potential mechanism underlying Zolpidem addiction., Patient Concerns: The patient was a 46-year-old Tibetan woman who had been using Zolpidem intermittently to treat insomnia for at least 8 years. She was overweight, with a BMI of 28.04 kg/m², and had hypertension, diabetes, a 20-year smoking history, and several years of alcohol abuse, often seeking instant gratification. She voluntarily increased both the dosage and frequency of Zolpidem, experiencing euphoria, anxiolysis, and increased appetite at higher doses, which led her to gradually escalate her dosage to 280 mg per day in divided doses. However, upon stopping Zolpidem, she experienced withdrawal symptoms, including insomnia, tension, and palpitations., Diagnoses: She was diagnosed with a combination of hypnotic use disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and diabetes., Interventions: She underwent diazepam replacement therapy, along with antianxiety medications and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, to address Zolpidem addiction., Outcomes: After 13 days of inpatient treatment, the patient successfully quit Zolpidem. During a 3-month follow-up, she returned to work and remained free from Zolpidem use., Lessons: We speculate that Zolpidem addiction is likely linked to the drug's euphoric effects and certain patient characteristics, such as sensation-seeking behavior. A comprehensive approach, involving both pharmacological and psychological interventions, is essential for an effective detoxification strategy for Zolpidem addiction., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background/aim: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor used in later lines for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) treatment, but its efficacy and tolerability are low. To improve the response rates and ameliorate adverse effects, different strategies have been implemented. In our study, we examined the effect of statin usage in patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib., Patients and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients with mCRC who were treated with regorafenib between January 2015 and December 2023. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were adverse effects and the tolerability of regorafenib., Results: The data of 105 patients were collected retrospectively. The median age of the patients was 66 years, and 60 patients were male. Seventeen patients (16.1%) were receiving statins. Statin-using patients were significantly older than non-users (72 years vs. 66.5 years, p=0.05). Comorbid diseases were more common in patients using statins. The median PFS was 1.9 months for statin users and 4.2 months for statin non-users (p<0.001), and the median OS was 4.7 vs. 6.7 months (p=0.01). Cox regression revealed that statin usage was significantly associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) for PFS (2.53) and OS (2.06) (both p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively)., Conclusion: Statins are associated with decreased survival and response rates in patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The prospective, single-arm, observational, phase 4 ETNA-AF Europe study collected real-world data about safety, effectiveness and therapeutic adherence in European patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly prescribed with edoxaban and followed up for 4 years., Methods: Overall, 13 164 patients were included in the full-analysis set, which means that they had at least one documentation after baseline at 4 years. The current paper reports about the 3329 Italian patients out of the whole European population., Results: In the Italian cohort, median age was 76.0 (69.0-82.0) years, with 57.4% of the patients being ≥75 years old. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was >4 in 586 (18.1%) patients. At baseline, 670 (20.8%) patients were classified as frail by the investigators. Edoxaban 30 mg/day was prescribed to 1013 (31.8%) patients: these were older, with more comorbidities and a lower estimated creatinine clearance compared with those receiving 60 mg/day. All-cause mortality was 4.1%/year and there were very low yearly rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events: major bleeding, 0.9%; intracranial hemorrhage, 0.2%; ischemic stroke, 0.3%; systemic embolism, <0.1%. These events were more frequent in patients ≥75 years or in patients with renal impairment or treated with edoxaban 30 mg/day. Advancing age was not associated with an increased incidence of intracranial bleeding., Conclusions: These findings confirm the favorable long-term safety and effectiveness profile of edoxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated in routine clinical care in Italy.

Background: With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), there remains an unmet need for options to address disease progression after prior ICIs. This single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs., Methods: This study enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or distant metastatic ESCC who received prior ICIs. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR)., Results: Between September 1, 2021 and March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment. Among the 49 patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.2 % (95 % CI 3.4-22.2), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.4 % (54.6-81.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95 % CI 3.8-6.5) and overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (5.5-13.6). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 patients (34.7 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred., Conclusions: This study showed that the confirmed ORR was modest and did not reach clinically meaningful improvement for patients with ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs, with a manageable safety profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Feng Zhao, Rongrong Zheng, Wenqing Zhu, and Zhiguo Hou are employees of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals. Yun Jia is an employee of Alpha X Biotech. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Sotorasib is a small molecule drug that specifically and irreversibly inhibits the KRAS p.G12C mutant protein. This analysis investigated the impact of a high-calorie high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of sotorasib in both healthy volunteers and patients with KRAS G12C advanced solid tumors. Each subject received a single oral dose of 360 or 960 mg of sotorasib under fasted conditions or with a high-fat meal (fed conditions). The geometric least squares means (GLSM) ratios (fed/fasted) for 360 mg of sotorasib C max and AUC inf were 1.03 and 1.38, respectively, in healthy volunteers (N = 14). The GLSM ratios (fed/fasted) for C max and AUC 0-24h were 1.38 and 1.75, respectively, with 360 mg of sotorasib in cancer patients (N = 2). The GLSM ratios (fed/fasted) for C max and AUC 0-24h were 0.660 and 1.25, respectively, with 960 mg of sotorasib in cancer patients (N = 8). Sotorasib was well tolerated in fast and fed conditions. The impact of a high-fat meal on sotorasib exposure is less than a 2-fold increase or decrease in C max and AUCs., (© 2024, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe reported adverse events (AEs) associated with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in a pediatric sample with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged 6-18 years, with at least one F508del variant, followed at multiple Italian CF centers., Study Design: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. All children receiving ETI therapy from October 2019 to December 2023 were included. We assessed the prevalence and type of any reported potential drug-related AEs, regardless of discontinuation necessity. Persistent AEs were defined as those continuing at the end of the observation period., Results: Among 608 patients on ETI, 109 (17.9%) reported at least 1 AE. The majority (n = 85, 77.9%) were temporary, with a median duration of 11 days (range 1-441 days). Only 7 (1.1%) patients permanently discontinued treatment, suggesting good overall safety of ETI. The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were transaminase elevations (temporary 14.1%, persistent 25.9%) and urticaria (temporary 41.2%, persistent 7.4%). Creatinine phosphokinase elevation was uncommon. No significant differences in AEs were observed based on sex, age groups (6-11 vs 12-18 years), or genotype. Pre-existing CF-related liver disease was associated with an increased risk of transaminase elevations. We identified significant variability in the percentage of reported AEs (ANOVA P value .026)., Conclusions: This real-world study highlights significant variability in reported AEs. Our findings suggest that ETI is a safe and well-tolerated therapy in children and adolescents with CF. However, further long-term safety and effectiveness investigations are warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Real-world data on clinical characteristics and outcomes related to the use of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is lacking., Methods:  The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE from 31 centers in Japan from January 2015 to August 2020. Our study population comprised 1,197 patients with active cancer who were divided into the edoxaban ( N  = 643, 54%), rivaroxaban ( N  = 297, 25%), and apixaban ( N  = 257, 22%) groups., Results:  The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE (9.3, 10.2, and 8.5%, respectively, p  = 0.82) and all-cause death (67.5, 66.8, and 63.8%, respectively, p  = 0.22) did not differ among the groups. Despite adjusting for confounders, the risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the groups. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group than those in the other groups (22.6, 14.0, and 22.8%, p  = 0.04; and 37.6, 26.8, and 38.3%, p  = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, in the rivaroxaban group, the risk for major bleeding was numerically lower (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.01) and that of clinically relevant all bleeding was significantly lower (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.92) than those in the edoxaban group., Conclusion:  The risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the different DOACs ; however, the risk of bleeding events could differ, with a potentially lower risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban., Competing Interests: Y.Y. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo, and grant support from Bayer Healthcare and Daiichi-Sankyo. T.M. reports lecturer's fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Kyocera, Novartis, and Toray; manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kowa; advisory board for Sanofi. Y.N. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo. K.K. received lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo. N.I. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi-Sankyo. S.I. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Y.O. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo, and research funds from Bayer Healthcare and Daiichi-Sankyo. K.T. received significant research grant from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Bristol-Myers K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and scholarship fund from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and honoraria from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and belongs to the endowed departments donated by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one, Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd., ITI Co., Ltd., Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd., NIPRO CORPORATION, TERUMO Co, Ltd., Abbott Medical Co., Ltd., Cardinal Health Japan, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd., Medical Appliance Co., Ltd., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this article to disclose., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Isavuconazole (ISA) and voriconazole (VORI) are recommended as the first-line treatment for invasive aspergillosis (IA). Despite theoretical advantages of ISA, both triazole agents have not been compared in solid organ transplant recipients., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of 2 retrospective multicenter cohorts of solid organ transplant recipients with invasive fungal disease (the SOTIS [Solid Organ Transplantation and ISavuconazole] and DiasperSOT [DIagnosis of ASPERgillosis in Solid Organ Transplantation] studies). We selected adult patients with proven/probable IA that were treated for ≥48 h with ISA (n = 57) or VORI (n = 77) as first-line therapy, either in monotherapy or combination regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical response at 12 wk from the initiation of therapy. Secondary outcomes comprised 12-wk all-cause and IA-attributable mortality and the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events and premature treatment discontinuation., Results: Both groups were comparable in their demographics and major clinical and treatment-related variables. There were no differences in the rate of 12-wk clinical response between the ISA and VORI groups (59.6% versus 59.7%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-2.00). This result was confirmed after propensity score adjustment (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.32-2.05) and matching (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.31-2.04). All-cause and IA-attributable mortality were also similar. Patients in the ISA group were less likely to experience treatment-emergent adverse events (17.5% versus 37.7%; P = 0.011) and premature treatment discontinuation (8.8% versus 23.4%; P = 0.027)., Conclusions: Front-line treatment with ISA for posttransplant IA led to similar clinical outcomes than VORI, with better tolerability and higher treatment completion., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) is a highly effective cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulating therapy for people with CF and at least one F508del variant. However, there is limited data about the safety and efficacy of this therapy in pediatric populations and in real-world settings. This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of ETI in children with CF., Methods: This was a prospective observational study including all children aged 6-11 years who initiated ETI therapy between October 2022 and March 2023 at the Pediatric CF Center of Milan (Italy). Study outcomes included changes in sweat chloride concentration, FEV 1 , LCI 2.5 , body mass index (BMI), tolerance, and safety. Mean changes in study outcomes from baseline through 24 weeks were estimated using mixed-effects regression models., Results: The study included 34 children with CF (median age: 8.3 years). At Week 12, we observed an average decrease in LCI 2.5 of 2.3 units (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.1; -1.5). At Week 24, sweat chloride concentration decreased by 63 mEq/L (95% CI: -69; -58), FEV 1 increased by 8.8 percentage point (95% CI: 3.7; 13.9) and BMI increased by 0.15 standard deviation scores (95% CI: 0.04; 0.25). Skin rashes appeared in 6 patients which spontaneously resolved within a few days. One month after treatment initiation, one patient experienced an elevation in liver function test results, which subsequently decreased during follow-up visits without necessitating discontinuation of therapy., Conclusions: Our data indicate that ETI therapy is well tolerated by children with CF and is effective in improving signs of lung function abnormalities from early childhood., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Pulmonology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a medical condition characterized by forming a blood clot, or thrombus, in one of the deep veins, typically in the legs. It is a type of venous thromboembolism, which refers to the formation of blood clots in the veins. It is caused by Virchow's triad (stasis, hypercoagulation, and endothelial injury)., Objective: Our main objective is to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and edoxaban in treating lower extremity DVT., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 406 patients subjected to DVT treatment using direct oral anticoagulants (edoxaban and rivaroxaban) at our hospital. We recruited adult patients (aged 18 years and more) diagnosed with lower extremity DVT and received treatment with either rivaroxaban or edoxaban as the primary anticoagulant therapy for DVT. We excluded patients who received treatment with other anticoagulant medications (warfarin and heparin) as the primary therapy for DVT., Results: The groups showed statistically significant differences in red blood cell count and hemoglobin levels, with the edoxaban group having high values. However, the 2 groups observed no statistically significant differences in creatinine clearance, white blood cell count, platelet count, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels. The difference in the incidence of pulmonary embolism between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). The edoxaban group had fewer pulmonary embolism patients than the rivaroxaban group. The reduction in recurrent thrombosis was significantly higher in the rivaroxaban group compared to the edoxaban group. There were no significant differences in the major bleeding at various sites across the 2 treatment groups (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetic profile includes rapid absorption and a relatively short half-life. It means that once administered, rivaroxaban quickly reaches its peak concentration in the blood and is subsequently eliminated from the body within a relatively short period. Edoxaban's pharmacokinetic profile may include slower absorption and a longer half-life than rivaroxaban. It can result in a slower rate of achieving peak concentration and a more prolonged presence in the bloodstream. These results emphasize the need for careful consideration of anticoagulant therapy in patients with underlying cancer and underscore the importance of managing risks while providing adequate anticoagulation to prevent thrombotic events., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To review the efficacy and safety of oral vismodegib (Erivedge; Genentech) in the management of locally advanced orbital and periorbital basal cell carcinoma (BCC)., Methods: A literature search was conducted last in September 2023 in the PubMed database for English language original research that evaluated the effect of oral vismodegib on orbital and periorbital BCC. Sixty articles were identified and 16 met the inclusion criteria., Results: Most studies demonstrated high response rates, with up to 100% of patients responding to the medication in individual studies and initial complete regression occurring in up to 88% of patients. Vismodegib treatment resulted in significant reductions in tumor volume, resulting in globe preservation for most patients. However, in 12% of patients, the response was partial. Recurrences also occurred with substantial frequency, even after an initial complete response. As such, up to 79.4% of patients required surgical intervention, and up to 23% of patients still required exenteration. Use of these agents resulted in reductions in tumor volume that may delay or prevent the need for exenteration in some, but not all, patients. Importantly, molecular analysis of tissue excised after vismodegib therapy revealed persistent tumor in all patients, with frequent accumulation of mutations that may confer resistance to further hedgehog inhibitor therapy. Although most adverse events were rated as level I or II, side effects were common, with up to 100% of patients in studies experiencing at least 1 event. Muscle cramps, alopecia, weight loss, fatigue, and dysgeusia were the most common adverse events, and several patients discontinued therapy because of them. Furthermore, 1 patient died of sepsis that may have resulted from the therapy., Conclusions: Although level I and II evidence are lacking, most studies indicate a benefit from the use of oral vismodegib to treat orbital and periorbital BCC tumor volume. However, patients should be cautioned about the adverse side effects of treatment and the persistence of tumor cells with mutations that may cause long-term resistance. Use of vismodegib as short-term neoadjuvant therapy may be effective in shrinking tumor volume to reduce surgical morbidity while reducing the frequency and severity of side effects., Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Multimodal analgesia is defined as using several drugs or techniques simultaneously to target different pain pathways or receptors to avoid pain propagation. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile and comparative bioavailability of etoricoxib 90 mg and tramadol 50 mg dosing alone (reference drugs) or in a novel fixed-dose combination (test drug) under fasting conditions in Mexican healthy volunteers. This was a randomized, open-label, 3-way, crossover, single-dose, prospective, and longitudinal study with a 14-day washout period. Eligible subjects were healthy Mexican adult volunteers. The drugs were dosing orally, according to the randomization sequence, after 10 hours of fasting and 4 hours before breakfast with 250 mL of water at room temperature. Serial blood samples were collected before and after dosing, both drugs were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Forty-two subjects were enrolled and 38 completed the study (28 men and 14 women, mean age 25.2 years, mean weight 66.6 kg). Test products were considered to have comparative bioavailability if confidence intervals of natural log-transformed for (maximum plasma drug concentration (C max ), (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve form 0 up to last sampling time (AUC 0-t ), and (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from 0 up to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ) data were within the range of 80%-125%. Non-serious adverse events were observed. The results demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic profile and bioavailability of the etoricoxib/tramadol fixed-dose combination are comparable to those of the reference products., (© 2024 Laboratorios Silanes. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Inavolisib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of the alpha isoform of the p110 catalytic subunit of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex (encoded by PIK3CA ) that also promotes the degradation of mutated p110α. Inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant has shown synergistic activity in preclinical models and promising antitumor activity in early-phase trials., Methods: In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared first-line inavolisib (at an oral dose of 9 mg once daily) plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (inavolisib group) with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (placebo group) in patients with PIK3CA -mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had had relapse during or within 12 months after the completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator., Results: A total of 161 patients were assigned to the inavolisib group and 164 to the placebo group; the median follow-up was 21.3 months and 21.5 months, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.3 to 20.5) in the inavolisib group and 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.59; P<0.001). An objective response occurred in 58.4% of the patients in the inavolisib group and in 25.0% of those in the placebo group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 80.2% in the inavolisib group and 78.4% in the placebo group; grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia, 5.6% and 0%, respectively; grade 3 or 4 stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, 5.6% and 0%; and grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, 3.7% and 0%. No grade 3 or 4 rash was observed. Discontinuation of any trial agent because of adverse events occurred in 6.8% of the patients in the inavolisib group and in 0.6% of those in the placebo group., Conclusions: In patients with PIK3CA -mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to significantly longer progression-free survival than placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant, with a greater incidence of toxic effects. The percentage of patients who discontinued any trial agent because of adverse events was low. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; INAVO120 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04191499.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Several studies have been published describing development of cutaneous malignancy after vismodegib therapy; no systematic review has been conducted to interpret these data. Our objective was to systemically review reported cases of same-site or different-site cutaneous malignancy after smoothened inhibitor (SMOi) therapy for primary basal cell carcinoma (BCC). PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were systematically searched January 1, 2012 - March 28, 2024. Inclusion criteria: primary BCC, SMOi therapy, and biopsy-proven secondary malignancy. Exclusion criteria: non-human subjects. Bias was assessed using Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Twenty-three cases describing same-site secondary malignancy were included. Average patient age was 67.2 years, mean treatment time 8.4 months, and average latency period to secondary malignancy development of 10.2 months. Five cases describing different-site secondary cutaneous malignancies were included. Mean patient age was 80.4 years, mean treatment time 2.9 months, and mean latency period 4.5 months. Twenty-seven cases were associated with vismodegib, while one case described vismodegib then sonidegib therapy. Pathologies included squamous cell carcinoma, BCC, basosquamous carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. The mechanism(s) by which same-site and different-site secondary malignancy occur are not known; mechanisms may differ depending on location type and secondary tumor type. We discuss multiple mechanistic hypotheses including pharmacologic selective pressure leading to hedgehog pathway mutant cells and activation of pro-growth signaling, and potential protective effect of hedgehog inhibition from melanoma given reports of rapid growth after SMOi discontinuation. This study is limited by the small number of reported cases. Additional research is needed to investigate these hypotheses., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Cerebral aspergillosis (CA) is associated with high mortality. According to the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines, the recommended first-line treatment for all forms of aspergillosis is voriconazole or isavuconazole. However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in CA., Methods: We conducted a European multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with isavuconazole for proven or probable CA between 2014 and 2022 and compared the outcomes with those of weighted control groups from the previously published French national cohort of CA, the Cerebral Aspergillosis Lesional Study (CEREALS)., Results: Forty patients from 10 countries were included. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (53%) and solid-organ transplantation (20%). Isavuconazole was administered as a first-line treatment to 10 patients, primarily in combination therapy, resulting in control of CA in 70% of these cases. Thirty patients received isavuconazole after a median of 65 days on another therapy, mostly because of side effects (50%) or therapeutic failure (23%) of the previous treatment. Predominantly given as monotherapy, it achieved control of CA in 73% of the patients. Seventeen patients (43%) underwent neurosurgery. When measured, isavuconazole levels were low in cerebrospinal fluid but adequate in serum and brain tissue. Isavuconazole toxicity led to treatment interruption in 7.5% of the patients. Twelve-week mortality was 18%. Comparison with the CEREALS cohort showed comparable survival in patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole as a first-line treatment., Conclusions: Isavuconazole appears to be a well-tolerated treatment. Mortality of CA treated with isavuconazole is similar to that reported with voriconazole., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. A. C.: honoraria from Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Gilead, Celgene, Incyte, AbbVie, Astellas. A. A.-I.: honoraria for educational talks on behalf of Gilead, Pfizer, Mundipharma, and MSD, outside the submitted work. H. H.: honoraria from Gilead, Sandoz, and Sanofi. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objective: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have revolutionised cancer therapy, particularly breast cancer therapy. However, concerns about their potential to cause neurological and psychiatric adverse events (AEs) have emerged, and these concerns remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the signals related to neurological and psychiatric AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitor use., Methods: A retrospective study was performed to analyse reports of AEs associated with the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors (abemaciclib, ribociclib and palbociclib) from the first quarter of 2015 to the fourth quarter of 2023 on the basis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Both the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were used for signal detection. The timing of events was assessed with the Weibull shape parameter (WSP). The management, analysis and presentation of the data were performed via Python (version 3.8) and R software (version 4.3.2)., Results: A total of 19,001 AE reports in which CDK4/6 inhibitors were identified as the 'primary suspect drug' were included in this study. These events were predominantly observed in patients aged 65 to 85 years. Through an ROR analysis, 85 positive signals for neurological and psychiatric AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors were identified. The MGPS method revealed 61 positive AE signals for neurological and psychiatric AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. A total of 34 positive AE signals were identified by both the ROR and MGPS analyses. The WSP indicated that the onset times for AEs associated with all three CDK4/6 inhibitors tended to be early in drug therapy, suggesting a propensity for early failure type., Conclusion: The present study revealed neurological and psychiatric AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors that often occur early in treatment. Significant signals include spinal cord herniation and cerebral microangiopathy. Close monitoring of these AEs is crucial. Further studies are necessary to verify the connection between CDK4/6 inhibitors and neurological and psychiatric AEs., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objectives: KRAS (G12C) inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have approved treatment in patients with KRAS (G12C)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The post-marketing data concerning KRAS (G12C) inhibitors remain limited, and the outcomes of relevant studies are yet to yield conclusive evidence supporting the long-term safety of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors., Materials and Methods: This investigation comprehensively assessed adverse events (AEs) attributed to KRAS (G12C) inhibitors by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The dataset encompasses the period from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the correlation between KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and AEs. The metrics employed for the evaluation of disproportionality comprise the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM)., Results: A total of 2,253 and 486 reports were identified as related to sotorasib and adagrasib, with the identification of 51 and 26 preferred terms, respectively. The most frequent AEs of sotorasib comprised diarrhoea (ROR 5.27), hepatotoxicity (ROR 38.09), alanine aminotransferase increased (ROR 17.41), aspartate aminotransferase increased (ROR 20.88), and hepatic function abnormal (ROR 19.88). The most common AEs of adagrasib included diarrhoea (ROR 4.21), nausea (ROR 3.84), vomiting (ROR 5.36), decreased appetite (ROR 4.79), and dehydration (ROR 7.00). A relatively reduced risk of hepatotoxicity but a increased risk of serious AEs in adagrasib compared to sotorasib (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Our findings would provide valued evidence for healthcare professionals to recognize AEs associated with KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and differences between sotorasib and adagrasib, and guide their clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Targeted immunotherapy became the most advanced approach for cancer treatment. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) expressed on activated T cells can reverse immune suppression and cause T-cell activation. Nivolumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody that is a fully human immunoglobulin G4, blocks PD-1 and promotes antitumor immunity. Cabozantinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. As a result of enhancing immune response in normal tissues, immune-related adverse events can occur. Thyroid dysfunction is a common form of immune-related adverse event and seen on 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans post therapy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: There is limited information on combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of HAIC plus camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) and apatinib (an VEGFR-2 inhibitor) versus camrelizumab and apatinib for Ad-HCC., Methods: From April 2019 to October 2022, 416 patients with Ad-HCC who received either HAIC plus camrelizumab and apatinib (TRIPLET protocol, n = 207) or camrelizumab and apatinib (C-A protocol, n = 209) were reviewed retrospectively. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selective bias. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Cox regression analyses of independent prognostic factors were evaluated., Results: After PSM 1:1, 109 patients were assigned to two groups. The median OS of not reached in the TRIPLET group was significantly longer than that of 19.9 months in the C-A group (p < 0.001), while in the TRIPLET group, the median PFS of 11.5 months was significantly longer than that of 9.6 months in the C-A group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that the factors significantly affected the OS were CTP grade, tumor number > 3, and TRIPLET treatment (p < 0.001). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred at a rate of 82.1% vs. 71.3% in TRIPLET and C-A groups, respectively., Conclusion: The TRIPLET protocol has promising survival benefits in the management of patients with Ad-HCC, with acceptable safety., Trail Registration: The study has been retrospectively registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , ChiCTR2300075828)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Efficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies., Design, Setting and Participants: Patients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany., Interventions: Cabozantinib was administered as a standard of care., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized., Results and Limitations: About 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study., Conclusions: Cabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure VG: Compensated lectures: AstraZeneca, Astellas, BMS, EISAI, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, ONO Pharmaceutical, Novartis/AAA. Advisory Board: Apogepha, BMS; EISAI, EUSA Pharm, Cureteq, Debiopharm, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Oncorena, PCI Biotech. Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer. Travel support: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Janssen, Pfizer MB: RR: Advisory Board: Apogepha,Ipsen, Merck .Pfizer Travel support: Janssen, Pfizer GN: compensated lectures: Roche Pharma, MEDAC, Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Merck, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas; Advisory Boards: Roche Pharma, Sanofi, BMS, Merck Serono, Pfizer, MEDAC, Ipsen, Janssen, Travel support:Roche Pharma, Pfizer, Merck, Janssen, maunscript writing: Pfizer, BMS, Merck MJS: Compensated lectures: Astellas, Apogepha, Bayer, BMS, EISAI, Hexal, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, Medac, MSD, Janssen-Cilag. Advisory board: BMS, Gilead, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen-Cilag. Congress: Apogepha, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Pfizer. Research Grants: Gilead, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, QED, MSD. FA: none, MM: none, MC: none, MOZ: none AW: Compensated lectures: AIO, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, iOMEDICO Advisory Board: BMS;Gilead, Lilly Merck, MSD, Pfizer,Janssen Research Grant: AIO, iOMEDICO AH: none JC: none CD: Compensated lectures from Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. Advisory Board: Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. Travel support: Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen and Bayer HT: none, MS: none, DS: none PI: Compensated lectures: AstraZeneca, BMS, EISAI, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis/AAA. Advisory Board: Apogepha, BMS; EISAI, EUSA Pharm, Gilead, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Oncorena, PCI Biotech. Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer. Travel support: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genetic variants of UGT1A1, involved in glucuronidation and clearance of bilirubin, are associated with reduced bilirubin metabolization and drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia. We studied the impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with pazopanib, cabozantinib, and axitinib., Methods: We genotyped the UGT1A1*28 TA6/TA6-TA6/TA7-TA7/TA7 polymorphism and correlated with median baseline, on-treatment and peak bilirubin levels during therapy, incidence of grade-1- or -2 (G1/2)-hyperbilirubinemia and time-to-G1-hyperbilirubinemia., Results: Of the 66 patients treated with pazopanib, 29 received axitinib and 28 cabozantinib upon progression. Median baseline bilirubin was higher in TA7/TA7-carriers versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers at start of pazopanib (P < .0001), cabozantinib (P < .0001), and axitinib (P = .007). During pazopanib therapy, median bilirubin increased 1.4-fold in TA7/TA7+TA6/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6-carriers. On cabozantinib, bilirubin increased 1.5-fold in TA7/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers. Axitinib did not increase bilirubin in any genotype. Peak bilirubin in TA7/TA7- versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers was higher on pazopanib (P < .0001) or cabozantinib (P < .0001). With pazopanib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 57% of TA7/TA7- and 12% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P = .0009) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 36% and 6% of the patients, respectively (P = .004). On cabozantinib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 100% of TA7/TA7- and 5% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P < .0001) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 33% and 0% of the patients, respectively (P = .04). On axitinib, no correlation between the genotypes and G1/2-hyperbilirubinemia was observed., Conclusion: We validate the previously described impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on isolated bilirubin increase on pazopanib. We report for the first time that cabozantinib also interferes with UGT1A1 and causes isolated bilirubin increase., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) refractory to multiple therapies may require a combination of drugs targeting different mechanisms and targets. In this retrospective, multicentre, international study, we report the safety and effectiveness of avatrombopag and fostamatininb in combination administered to 18 patients with multirefractory ITP. Overall, the combination response was achieved in 15 patients (83.3%), with a median time from combination start to best response of 15 days (IQR: 8-35 days). After a median follow-up of 256 days (IQR: 142.8-319), 5 patients relapsed (26.7%), all during tapering or stopping one drug. Adverse events were described in 6 of 18 patients (33%)., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: The administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: Total 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as "no concomitant PPIs (PPI-)" if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as "concomitant PPIs (PPI+)" if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given., Results: Eighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI- and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI- (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI- (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI- (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found., Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use., Competing Interests: Disclosure CP acted as a consultant and/or a speaker for Angelini Pharma, Biorek, BMS, Eisai, General Electric, Ipsen, Medendi, and MSD, and as a protocol steering committee member for BMS, Eisai, and MSD. MR received honoraria as a speaker/consultant by Astra Zeneca, MSD, BMS, Janssen, Merck and Gilead. MDR received fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Bio-Rad, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, and Ipsen; RD reports receiving speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Gilead, and EUSA Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To report an incident of a breakthrough deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and potential example of a drug-drug interaction in a patient treated with edoxaban and rifabutin who was being treated for respiratory tuberculosis. Case: A 76-year-old male presented with anemia requiring transfusion and subsequent shortness of breath that was later diagnosed to be respiratory tuberculosis. He experienced a prolonged hospital stay due to persistently positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis respiratory samples and a complicated social situation that required continuous hospitalization for approximately five months. During his treatment the patient was transitioned from apixaban to edoxaban due to a drug-drug interaction with rifabutin. He subsequently had a DVT while on edoxaban after two months of therapy that would require him to transition to warfarin. Conclusion: This case represents an example of a potentially significant drug-drug interaction between edoxaban and rifabutin. Other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exhibit a potential drug-drug interaction that limit their effectiveness when used with rifamycins. This report describes the first known case of a patient experiencing a DVT after prolonged edoxaban use in combination with rifabutin. Treatment with DOACs for patients taking concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers such as rifabutin may be more complicated than previously believed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

It remains unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are more effective and safer than warfarin in low-weight patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we retrospectively compared the effectiveness and safety of NOACs with those of warfarin in low-weight patients with AF. We extracted the July 2011-September 2022 data of patients with AF treated with a NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) or warfarin at a tertiary hospital. The patients were divided into low-weight (body weight ≤ 60 kg) and non-low-weight (body weight = 60-100 kg) groups. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke (IS) or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding, whereas the secondary outcomes were any ischemic and bleeding events. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups. In total, 5,044 patients (mean age = 73.7 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score = 3.0, mean HAS-BLED score = 2.3) were enrolled and divided into low-weight and non-low-weight groups-containing 1,666 (1,406 NOAC users, 260 warfarin users) and 3,378 (2,978 NOAC users, 400 warfarin users) patients, respectively. NOACs were associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event in the low-weight group (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.73). The between-group differences in the risks of IS/SE, any ischemic event, major bleeding, and any bleeding event were nonsignificant. Thus, the use of NOACs (specifically dabigatran or edoxaban) is associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event than warfarin use in low-weight patients with AF., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: To review the literature to outline findings from clinical trials assessing interventions for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who have progressed on androgen receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) therapies., Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of interventions used in patients that progressed on prior ARAT therapies. A literature search was conducted using the OVID platform that searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL bibliographic databases., Results: Of the 10,114 citations identified, a total of 36 studies representing 33 unique trials were included in the review. Of the 33 trials, 21 were randomized controlled trials and 12 were single-arm trials. A total of 11 were phase III trials, 13 were phase II trials, and 2 were phase I trials. The majority of included trials were open-label ( n  = 29) and the remaining were double-blind ( n  = 4). A total of 16 trials evaluated ARAT based therapies, 7 trials evaluated taxane-based treatments, 10 trials evaluated PARP inhibitors, 8 trials evaluated immunotherapies, and 8 trials evaluated other therapies (i.e. cabozantinib, mitoxantrone, radium-223, 177 [Lu-177]-PNT2002, 177 Lu-PSMA-617, samotolisib)., Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrated there are limited effective treatment options in this patient population. Unlike other cancer types, immunotherapy agents appear to provide little to no benefit. Conversely, agents such as taxane-based chemotherapy (e.g. cabazitaxel) and radionuclide therapy provide the most value in this patient population. Further research is needed to explore new therapies in this disease area and to optimize existing treatment strategies with more effective combination therapies.

Background: Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) is considered high risk as it related to prior exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy agents for solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. Compared with de novo AML, t-AML is associated with lower remission rates, inferior overall survival (OS) and higher relapse rates. Many efforts have been devoted to improving the overall but with limited success, and novel strategy is thus highly needed., Case Description: We reported one patient with refractory/relapsed t-AML was successfully treated with Palbociclib combined with Venetoclax and Azacytidine (AZA). In this case, a 47-year-old patient with t-AML recurred during Venetoclax in combination with AZA therapy. However, the patient achieved morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular complete remission again after Palbociclib combined with Venetoclax and AZA., Conclusions: Although only one successful case is presented here, three-drug combination regimens should be considered as another treatment option for t-AML in the future., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Although smoothened inhibitors (SMOi) have demonstrated efficacy in the management of basal cell carcinoma, no guidelines are available on how to utilize SMOi in the treatment of Gorlin syndrome (GS). This review's objective is to assess the clinical response to SMOi in GS, provide practical guidance for clinicians, and identify areas for future research. Through comprehensive searches of previous publications and expert opinion, this review demonstrates that intermittent dosing of SMOi and daily dosing have similar efficacy. While the adverse events of SMOi may result in their discontinuation during treatment of GS, intermittent dosing may improve compliance., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hypertensive crisis is an acute increase in blood pressure >180/120 mm Hg. A titratable antihypertensive agent is preferred to lower blood pressure acutely in a controlled way and prevent an abrupt overcorrection. Nicardipine and clevidipine are both dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers that provide unique benefits for blood pressure control., Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nicardipine or clevidipine for blood pressure control in the setting of hypertensive crisis., Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients received either nicardipine or clevidipine for the treatment of hypertensive crisis. The primary outcome was achievement of 25% reduction in mean arterial pressure at 1 h. The secondary outcome was achievement of a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <160 mm Hg at 2-6 h from the start of the infusion., Results: This study included a total of 156 patients, 74 in the nicardipine group and 82 in the clevidipine group. The SBP on admission and at the start of the infusion were similar between groups. There was no difference between groups in achieving a 25% reduction in mean arterial pressure at 1 h. Nicardipine achieved an SBP goal of <160 mm Hg at 2-6 h significantly more often than the clevidipine group (89.2% vs. 73.2%; p = 0.011)., Conclusions: There is no difference between agents for initial blood pressure control in the treatment of hypertensive crisis. Nicardipine showed more sustained SBP control, with a lower risk of rebound hypertension and a significant cost savings compared with clevidipine., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rimegepant, a small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is indicated for acute and preventive migraine treatment in the United States and other countries. However, there is a lack of prospective real-world evidence for the use of rimegepant in Chinese migraine patients., Methods: This was a single-arm, prospective, real-world study. While taking rimegepant to treat migraine attacks as needed, eligible participants were asked to record their pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms for a single attack at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose via a digital platform. Adverse events (AEs) during the rimegepant treatment period were recorded and analysed. The percentages of participants who experienced moderate to severe pain at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were assessed. Additionally, the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were analysed. In addition, the total cohort (full population, FP) was stratified into a prior nonresponder (PNR) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of rimegepant for relatively refractory migraine and a rimegepant and eptinezumab (RE) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of the combination of these drugs., Results: By November 24th, 2023, 133 participants (FP, n = 133; PNR group, n = 40; RE group, n = 28) were enrolled, and 99 participants (FP, n = 99; PNR group, n = 30; RE group, n = 23) were included in the analysis. Rimegepant was effective in treating migraine in the FP and both subgroups, with a significant decreasing trend in the percentages of participants experiencing moderate to severe pain postdose (p < 0.05) and a marked increase in the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose compared with predose. AEs were reported by 6% of participants in the FP, and all AEs were mild., Conclusions: In the real world, rimegepant is effective in the acute treatment of migraine patients in China. The low incidence rate of AEs highlighted the favourable tolerability profile of rimegepant., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05709106. Retrospectively registered on 2023-02-01., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. LIBRETTO-001 is a registrational phase I/II, single-arm, open-label study of selpercatinib in patients with RET (REarranged during Transfection)-activated cancers (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03157128). We present long-term safety and efficacy from LIBRETTO-001 in patients with RET -mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC; n = 324) and RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer encompassing different histological subtypes (TC; n = 66). At the data cutoff of January 2023, the objective response rate was 82.5% among patients with cabozantinib/vandetanib-naïve MTC and 95.8% among patients with treatment-naïve TC. At a median follow-up time of 42.4 and 44.0 months in patients with cabozantinib/vandetanib-naïve and pretreated MTC, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached and 41.4 months, respectively. At a median follow-up time of 24.9 and 30.4 months in patients with treatment-naïve and pretreated TC, the median PFS was not reached and 27.4 months, respectively. Three-year PFS rates were 75.2% and 87.3% among patients with cabozantinib/vandetanib-naïve MTC and treatment-naïve TC, respectively. Median PFS was similar to median duration of response for each patient group. The safety profile of selpercatinib was consistent with previous reports. With an additional follow-up of 37 months and 228 more patients from the last disclosure, selpercatinib continued to provide durable and robust responses in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with RET -mutant MTC and RET fusion-positive TC.

Highly selective RET inhibitor selpercatinib has demonstrated notable efficacy in advanced/progressive RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients. However, despite a more tolerable toxicity profile than multikinase inhibitors, peculiar adverse events (AEs) have been described. Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) is a respiratory disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis in small conducting airways. We evaluated a 70-year-old man with advanced RET-mutant MTC who developed OB during treatment with selpercatinib. Radiological features of OB occurred early and persisted during selpercatinib treatment, with a waxing and waning pattern. Notably, a partial response of MTC was achieved during the treatment, and selpercatinib was never reduced or interrupted. The almost complete absence of symptoms and the fluctuating trend, without specific treatment for OB, suggested that it is necessary to carefully evaluate the risks mediated by this AE with the risks of modifying or discontinuing the anti-cancer therapy.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, long-term prognosis and safety of combining chemotherapy with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC)., Methods: In this single arm phase II trial, twenty-nine patients with advanced BTC were included, all of whom received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as the first-line treatment. And the study analyzed anti-tumor efficacy, long-term prognosis, and adverse reactions., Results: Among the patients, 0 patient achieved complete response, 18 patients (62.1%) achieved partial response, 8 patients (27.6%) had stable disease, and 3 patients (10.3%) experienced progressive disease. The corresponding objective response rate (ORR) was 18/29 (62.1%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 26/29 (89.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0 -21.8) and the median progress free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.8- 12.6). The 1-year OS and PFS were 65% (95% CI: 0.479-0.864) and 41% (95% CI: 0.234-0.656), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 27/29 (93.1%), and the incidence of grade III/IV adverse reactions was 5/29 (17.2%)., Conclusion: The combination of chemotherapy, regorafenib, and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC may has good anti-tumor efficacy without causing serious adverse reactions, and can significantly improve the long-term prognosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Liu, Bai, Sun, Hu, Ge and Xue.)

Context: Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) improve the treatment of refractory thyroid cancer, including radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) and advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (aMTC)., Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy of MKIs in improving survival outcomes and safety., Data Sources: Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were performed from inception to December 2023., Study Selection: Three independent authors selected these studies. Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of a MKI to other MKIs or placebo were included., Data Extraction and Synthesis: This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of MKI., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and adverse events., Results: Cabozantinib 60 mg/day (CAB60) was associated with the highest prolonged PFS in RAIR-DTC patients, followed by lentivatinib 18 or 24 mg/day (LEN18 or LEN24), and apatinib. PFS was also improved in aMTC patients who received CAB 140 mg/day (CAB140), CAB60, or anlotinib. A significantly greater improvement on the performance of OS was seen in CAB60, LEN24, anlotinib, and sorafenib in RAIR-DTC patients, but in aMTC patients there were lack of statistical differences. Compared with the low-dose MKIs, high-dose MKIs such as CAB, LEN, and vandetanib increased the incidence of adverse events., Conclusion: CAB60, LEN, and apatinib are promising topical MKIs with statistically significant primary outcomes in RAIR-DTC patients, while CAB and anlotinib are effective in prolonging PFS in aMTC patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. See the journal About page for additional terms.)

Background/aims: Early studies on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reported a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with warfarin; however, recent studies have reported a reduced risk. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the risk of GIB in users of DOAC and warfarin., Methods: Using a common data model, we investigated the comparative risk of GIB in subjects from eight hospitals who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin. We excluded subjects who had a prior history of GIB or had been prescribed both medications. After propensity score matching, we analyzed 3,347 matched pairs of new DOAC and new warfarin users., Results: The risk of GIB in new DOAC users was comparable to that in new warfarin users (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.40; p=0.808). New DOAC users had a similar risk of GIB to new warfarin users among older patients >65 years (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.52; p=0.997) and in older patients >75 years (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.10; p=0.509). In addition, the risk of GIB was not significantly different between two groups according to sex. We also found that the risk of GIB in DOAC users was 26% lower in edoxaban or apixaban subgroups compared to rivaroxaban or dabigatran subgroups (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00; p=0.049)., Conclusions: In real-world practice, the risk of GIB in new DOAC users is comparable to that in new warfarin users. In DOAC users, the risk of GIB was lower in edoxaban or apixaban subgroups than rivaroxaban or dabigatran subgroups.

Objective: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy have secured a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and have transformed the therapeutic landscape. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy in which another CDK4/6i is continued after progression on a prior CDK4/6i may still offer advantageous therapeutic effects. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is an area of active investigation in the ongoing pursuit to improve outcomes for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- ABC., Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated with cross-line CDK4/6is (abemaciclib, palbociclib, ribociclib, and dalpiciclib) after progression with another CDK4/6i. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, objective response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, as promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., Results: Eighty-two HR+/HER2- ABC patients who received cross-line CDK4/6i therapy from January 2022 to February 2024 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years. The median PFS of all patients was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.2). Cox regression analysis identified lung metastasis and a switch to endocrine therapy following prior CDK4/6i therapy as independent predictive factors for PFS. Notably, patients who previously received abemaciclib and switched to palbociclib upon disease progression had a median PFS of 10.7 months. The strategy of transitioning to chemotherapy after progression on a prior CDK4/6i, then to a subsequent CDK4/6i merits further investigation. Hematologic toxicity was the most common grade ≥ 3 AEs. No instances of fatal safety events were observed., Conclusions: Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is associated with significant clinical benefits and manageable safety profiles in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, which underscores cross-line CDK4/6i therapy potential as an effective treatment strategy., Competing Interests: No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors.)

Concomitant direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (anti-VEGF TKI) have been associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Nevertheless, concomitant administration seems frequent in clinical practice in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and appears to be safe according to the retrospective study by Boileve A. et al. But the risk of an additional pharmacokinetic interaction between anti-VEGF TKI and DOACs must be considered, in case of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition by the TKI. We describe a case report with a major bleeding event in a renal metastatic cancer patient treated with cabozantinib and rivaroxaban. This case highlights the difficult therapeutic decision in a complex patient with cancer-associated thrombosis, who refused the anticoagulant subcutaneous route. Accumulation of bleeding risk factors (genito-urinary tumor localization) was additive to several pharmacodynamic interactions (acetylsalicylic acid, venlafaxine) and a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between cabozantinib and rivaroxaban. Indeed, cabozantinib-related P-glycoprotein inhibition could have led to a supratherapeutic level of rivaroxaban, contributing partly to the bleeding event. Before combining an anti-VEGF TKI and DOACs, a multidisciplinary pretherapeutic assessment seems crucial to evaluate the patient's bleeding risk factors, pharmacodynamic interactions, and the risk of pharmacokinetic interactions mediated by P-gp., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism., Observations: For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure., Conclusions and Relevance: When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

Global epidemiological data show that the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) has increased in recent decades, with the rising frequency of infections caused by Aspergillus and Mucorales order species. The number and variety of patients at risk of IFD has also expanded, owing in part to advances in the treatment of hematologic malignancies and other serious diseases, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and other therapies causing immune suppression. Isavuconazonium sulfate (active moiety: isavuconazole) is an advanced-generation triazole antifungal approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis that has demonstrated activity against a variety of yeasts, moulds, and dimorphic fungi. While real-world clinical experience with isavuconazole is sparse in some geographic regions, it has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in diverse patient populations, including those with multiple comorbidities who may have failed to respond to prior triazole antifungal therapy. Isavuconazole may be suitable for patients with IFD receiving concurrent QTc-prolonging therapy, as well as those on venetoclax or ruxolitinib. Data from clinical trials are not available to support the use of isavuconazole prophylactically for the prevention of IFD or for the treatment of endemic IFD, such as those caused by Histoplasma spp., but real-world evidence from case studies suggests that it has clinical utility in these settings. Isavuconazole is an option for patients at risk of IFD, particularly when the use of alternative antifungal therapies is not possible because of toxicities, pharmacokinetics, or drug interactions., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology.)

Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms with an increasing annual incidence and prevalence. Many are metastatic at presentation or recur following surgical resection and require systemic therapy, for which somatostatin analogs such as octreotide or lanreotide comprise typical first-line therapies. Nonetheless, treatment options remain limited. Epigenetic processes such as histone modifications have been implicated in malignant transformation and progression. In this study, we evaluated the anti-proliferative effects of a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, entinostat, which was computationally predicted to show anti-cancer activity, as confirmed in in vitro and in vivo models of GEP-NETs., Methods: This was a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate to entinostat. Additionally, with each patient as his/her own control we estimated the rates of tumor growth prior to enrollment on study and while receiving entinostat. Patients received 5 mg entinostat weekly until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The dose could be changed to 10 mg biweekly for patients who did not experience grade ≥ 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in cycle 1, but was primarily administered at the starting 5 mg weekly dose., Results: The study enrolled only 5 patients due to early termination by the drug sponsor. The first patient that enrolled had advanced disease and died within days of enrollment before follow-up imaging due to a grade 5 AE unrelated to study treatment and was considered non-evaluable. Best RECIST response for the remaining 4 patients was stable disease (SD) with time on study of 154+, 243, 574, and 741 days. With each patient as his/her own control, rates of tumor growth on entinostat were markedly reduced with rates 17%, 20%, 33%, and 68% of the rates prior to enrollment on study. Toxicities possibly or definitely related to entinostat included grade 2/3 neutrophil count decrease [2/4 (50%)/ 2/4 (50%)], grade 3 hypophosphatemia [1/4, (25%)], grade 1/2 fatigue [1/4 (25%)/ 2/4 (50%)], and other self-limiting grade 1/2 AEs., Conclusion: In the treatment of relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs, entinostat 5 mg weekly led to prolonged SD and reduced the rate of tumor growth by 32% to 83% with an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03211988)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes for patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Nevertheless, they differ from each other in terms of chemical, biological, and pharmacological features, as well as toxicity profiles. We aim to determine whether QTc prolongation is caused by CDK4/6i in general or if it is associated with ribociclib only., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the prevalence of QTc prolongation as an adverse event in HR+ breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6i vs those without CDK4/6i. We pooled relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the binary endpoint of QT prolongation., Results: We included 14 RCTs comprising 16 196 patients, of whom 8576 underwent therapy with CDK4/6i. An increased risk of QTc prolongation was associated with the use of CDK4/6i (RR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.67 to 3.29, P < .001; I2 = 44%). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant increase in the QTc interval for the ribociclib and palbociclib cohorts. The ribociclib subgroup showed a relative risk of 3.12 (95% CI = 2.09 to 4.65, P < .001; I2 = 12%), whereas the palbociclib subgroup had a relative risk of 1.51 (95% CI = 1.05 to 2.15, P = .025; I2 = 0%)., Conclusion: Palbociclib was associated with QTc prolongation; however, the relative risk for any grade QTc was quantitively twice with ribociclib. Furthermore, grade 3 QTc prolongations were observed exclusively with ribociclib. These results are important for guiding clinical decision-making and provide reassurance regarding the overall safety profile of this drug class., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 85% of liver cancer cases and is the third leading cause of cancer death. Regorafenib is a multi-target inhibitor that dramatically prolongs progression-free survival in HCC patients who have failed sorafenib therapy. However, one of the primary factors limiting regorafenib's clinical utilization is toxicity. Using Clinical Trials.gov and PubMed, we gathered clinical data on regorafenib and conducted a extensive analysis of the medication's adverse reactions and mechanisms. Next, we suggested suitable management techniques to improve regorafenib's effectiveness., Areas Covered: We have reviewed the mechanisms by which regorafenib-induced toxicity occurs and general management strategies through clinical trials of regorafenib. Furthermore, by examining the literature on regorafenib and other tyrosine kinase inhibition, we summarized the mechanics of the onset of regorafenib toxicity and mechanism-based intervention strategies by reviewing the literature related to regorafenib and other tyrosine kinase inhibition., Expert Opinion: One of the primary factors restricting regorafenib's clinical utilization and combination therapy is its toxicity reactions. To optimize regorafenib treatment regimens, it is especially important to further understand the specific toxicity mechanisms of regorafenib as a multi-kinase inhibitor.

Objective: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (E/T/I) has provided life-changing pharmacotherapy for many people with cystic fibrosis (CF), but conflicting literature exists regarding the effect on mental health. While some reports suggest E/T/I may induce adverse psychiatric symptoms, others report improvements in mental health symptoms. To add to this growing body of knowledge, we retrospectively analyzed depression and anxiety symptoms before and after E/T/I initiation in adults with CF at a single large US CF center., Method: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores recorded in a database were studied. Patients with scores collected before and after E/T/I initiation were included. Regression analyses described associations between score changes and age, race, ethnicity, sex, CFTR variant, and prior depression and/or anxiety diagnoses. Secondary analyses examined possible confounding effects of the COVID-19 pandemic., Results: There was no change in mean GAD-7 (0.5 ± 5.3, p = 0.41) or PHQ-9 (-0.02 ± 6.0, p = 0.97) scores following initiation of E/T/I (N = 86). A trend between a prior diagnosis of depression and worsening in PHQ-9 post-E/T/I was observed (OR 3.58; p = 0.054)., Conclusions: Treatment with E/T/I does not lead to changes in depression or anxiety symptoms at the population level in this single center cohort study. A prior diagnosis of depression trended towards an increased odds of worsening PHQ-9 scores after E/T/I initiation., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Clinical Respiratory Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

This was an open-label, single-dose, phase I study to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and safety of edoxaban in pediatric subjects from birth to 18 years at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Children requiring anticoagulant therapy were enrolled into 5 age cohorts (0 to < 6 months (N = 12), 0.5 to < 2 years (N = 13), 2 to < 6 years (N = 13), 6 to < 12 years (N = 13), and 12 to < 18 years (N = 15)) receiving tablet or oral suspension of edoxaban at doses expected to be equivalent to 30 or 60 mg once daily (q.d.) in adult subjects with VTE. Sixty-six pediatric subjects were enrolled and completed the study. Edoxaban plasma concentration peaked between 1 and 3 hours and declined rapidly until 4-8 hours. The range of mean total apparent clearance across 5 age cohorts at low and high doses was 0.47 to 1.11 L/h/kg. The ranges of mean volume of central compartment and apparent peripheral volume were 2.31 to 3.59 L/kg and 1.92 to 4.14 L/kg, respectively. Across all age groups, the estimated median exposures were within the 0.5- to 1.5-fold of the median area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) in adult subjects receiving corresponding doses (30 mg q.d. for low dose and 60 mg q.d. for high dose). In all age groups, PD parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-Factor Xa activity) showed a linear PK-PD relationship and were in line with previous adult data. The results support further evaluation of the pediatric doses in larger pivotal trials., (© 2024 Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Purpose: The combination of bevacizumab and FOLFIRINOX is used in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (RASm-mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has antiangiogenic properties, cytostatic effects and also true cytotoxic effects, unlike bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the regorafenib-FOLFIRINOX combination in patients with RASm-mCRC., Methods: The FOLFIRINOX-R trial was a phase 1/2 study where the dose-escalation part (3 + 3 design with three dose levels, DLs) was completed before its early termination. FOLFIRINOX (14-day cycle) included oxaliplatin (standard dose), folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (150 or 180 mg/m²). Regorafenib (120 or 160 mg daily) was given from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was studied in the first three cycles. Eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status ≤ 1 and not previously treated RASm-mCRC., Results: Thirteen patients (median age: 65 years; min-max: 40-76) were enrolled. DLT could not be evaluated in one patient (DL3) due to poor observance. The median treatment duration and median follow-up were 6.2 (min-max: 2.3-10) and 13.4 (min-max: 3.8-18.0) months, respectively. Dose was modified in 12/13 (92%) patients. One grade 3 hypokalemia occurred at DL2. MTD was not reached at DL3. Grade 3 diarrhea was recorded in 7/13 patients (13 events) equally distributed in all DLs., Conclusion: The RP2D for this regorafenib-FFX combination could not be determined due to a high prevalence of grade 3 diarrhea related to treatment as advised by our Independent Data Monitoring Committee., Trial Registration Numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03828799., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Cabozantinib and nivolumab (CaboNivo) alone or with ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) have shown promising efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and rare genitourinary (GU) tumors in a dose-escalation phase I study. We report the final data analysis of the safety, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the phase I patients and seven expansion cohorts., Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase I trial. CaboNivo doublet expansion cohorts included (1) mUC, (2) mRCC, and (3) adenocarcinoma of the bladder/urachal; CaboNivoIpi triplet expansion cohorts included (1) mUC, (2) mRCC, (3) penile cancer, and (4) squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder and other rare GU tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02496208)., Results: The study enrolled 120 patients treated with CaboNivo (n = 64) or CaboNivoIpi (n = 56), with a median follow-up of 49.2 months. In 108 evaluable patients (CaboNivo n = 59; CaboNivoIpi n = 49), the ORR was 38% (complete response rate 11%) and the median duration of response was 20 months. The ORR was 42.4% for mUC, 62.5% for mRCC (n = 16), 85.7% for squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder (n = 7), 44.4% for penile cancer (n = 9), and 50.0% for renal medullary carcinoma (n = 2). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 84% of CaboNivo patients and 80% of CaboNivoIpi patients., Conclusion: CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi demonstrated clinical activity and safety in patients with multiple GU malignancies, especially clear cell RCC, urothelial carcinoma, and rare GU tumors such as squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder, small cell carcinoma of the bladder, adenocarcinoma of the bladder, renal medullary carcinoma, and penile cancer.

Background: Sotorasib 960 mg once daily is approved to treat KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sotorasib exhibits non-dose proportional pharmacokinetics and clinical responses at lower doses; therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sotorasib 960 mg and 240 mg., Methods: In this phase 2, randomized, open-label study, adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC received sotorasib 960 mg or 240 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pharmacokinetics. The study was not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing., Results: In the 960 mg group (n = 104), ORR was 32.7 % and DCR was 86.5 %. In the 240 mg group (n = 105), ORR was 24.8 % and DCR was 81.9 %. Median PFS was 5.4 months (960 mg) and 5.6 months (240 mg). At a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median OS was 13.0 months (960 mg) and 11.7 months (240 mg). AUC 0-24 h and C max were 1.3-fold numerically higher with the 960 mg dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥10 %) for 960 mg and 240 mg doses, respectively, were diarrhea (39.4 %; 31.7 %), nausea (23.1 %; 19.2 %), increased alanine aminotransaminase (14.4 %; 17.3 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (13.5 %; 13.5 %)., Conclusions: Patients treated with sotorasib 960 mg once daily had numerically higher ORR and DCR, and longer DOR and OS, than patients treated with 240 mg in this descriptive analysis. TEAEs were manageable with label-directed dose modifications., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03600883., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: M. J. Hochmair: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory role: Takeda, Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche, Amgen. K. Vermaelen: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Support for Attending Meetings: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Patents Planned/Issued/Pending: Ghent University; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck. G. Mountzios: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca/Greece, BMS GmbH & Co. KG, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, BMS GmbH & Co. KG, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Roche. E. Carcereny: No conflicts to disclose. C. Dooms: No conflicts to disclose. S.-H. Lee: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Lilly, Merck, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, BMS/Ono, IMBdx, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Lunit, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis. E. Morocz: No conflicts to disclose. T. Kato: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Speaker, Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Speaker: Pfizer, Amgen, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy: Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy, Speaker: Chugai; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono, Novartis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BeiGene, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Steering Committee: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or Part-Time Employment, Family Member: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Chugai, MSD, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Regeneron, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Biopharma, Haihe Biopharma, Blueprint Medicines, Turning Point, BeiGene, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Bayer, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Local PI: AstraZeneca. T.-E. Ciuleanu: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, Janssen, BMS, Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Sanofi, Novartis, Servier, A&D Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: Pfizer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Servier, Ipsen, Amgen, A&D Pharma, AstraZeneca, Genentech, BMS, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Astellas Pharma. G. K. Dy: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Mirati Therapeutics, Lilly, Amgen, Regeneron, Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Mirati Therapeutics, Lilly, Sanofi, BioAtla, Regeneron, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Revolution Medicines. B. Parente: No conflicts to disclose. K. J. O’Byrne: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Carpe Vitae Pharmaceuticals, DGC Diagnostics, Replica Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Group, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Takeda, TriStar, Yuhan; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or advisory Role: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seagen, Yuhan; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: three active patents. Q. S. Chu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, Amgen, AnHeart Therapeutics, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, Jazz Pharmaceutical, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. G. De Castro Jr.: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Novartis, Roche, Amgen, Janssen, Merck Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bayer, Roche, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Yuhan, Merck Serono, Janssen, Libbs, Sanofi, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Merck Serono, BMS, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Janssen, Amgen, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS, Merck Serono, Daiichi Sankyo. N. Girard: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sivan, Trizell; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: BMS, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sivan; Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Participation in Data Safety Monitoring Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Leadership Role: International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or Part-Time Employment, Employment of a Family Member: AstraZeneca. W. Snyder, Q. Tran, W. Kormany, B. Houk, B. Mehta: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or Part-Time Employment: Amgen Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Amgen Inc. A. Curioni-Fontecedro: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Roche, Takeda, Janssen; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Swiss Academy for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK); Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator of Clinical Trials: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, Clinical Trials: Takeda, MSD, BMS., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Selpercatinib is the first targeted therapy for rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main adverse effects of selpercatinib include hypertension, liver dysfunction, diarrhea, and QT prolongation on electrocardiograms. However, instances of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) are infrequently reported. We describe the first case of a patient with RET fusion-positive NSCLC treated with selpercatinib who developed DI-ILD, confirmed pathologically. The patient, a 72-year-old woman, initiated selpercatinib treatment following the postoperative recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma. After 15 months of treatment, computed tomography scans revealed multiple infiltrates and ground-glass opacities in both lungs. A thoracoscopic lung biopsy identified organizing pneumonia, attributed to DI-ILD caused by selpercatinib. Although she was asymptomatic, the patient's selpercatinib treatment was discontinued, leading to a gradual improvement in the lung infiltrates. Despite the lack of detailed reports, DI-ILD with selpercatinib represents a potentially serious adverse event and should be approached with caution., (© 2024 The Author(s). Thoracic Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) have broadened the treatment options available for patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) for whom traditional therapeutic approaches are not feasible or effective. Sonidegib and vismodegib are oral HHIs that were approved for treatment of patients with advanced BCC after demonstrating promising efficacy in the pivotal Phase II BOLT (NCT01327053) and ERIVANCE (NCT00833417) trials, respectively. However, the incidence and types of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) observed with these agents may limit continuous use of HHIs and ultimately impact clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the safety and tolerability profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib and discuss potential management strategies for HHI class-effect AEs, including muscle spasms, creatine phosphokinase increase, alopecia, and dysgeusia. These AEs primarily occur early in treatment and can lead to treatment discontinuation. Differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib may contribute to the variability noted in times to onset and resolution of these and other AEs. Evidence suggests that protocol modifications, such as treatment interruptions and dose reductions, are effective ways to manage AEs while maintaining disease control. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions may also be considered as part of an AE management strategy. Overall, healthcare providers and patients with advanced BCC should be aware of the HHI class-effect AEs and plan effective management strategies to avoid treatment discontinuation and optimize therapeutic response., (© 2024. The Author(s).)