1. Fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances at a 40-year dedicated municipal biosolids land disposal site.
- Author
-
Alvarez-Ruiz R, Lee LS, and Choi Y
- Subjects
- Groundwater chemistry, Fluorocarbons analysis, Environmental Monitoring, Water Pollutants, Chemical analysis, Soil Pollutants analysis
- Abstract
The fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) was evaluated at a site where municipal biosolids have been applied annually for 38 years as a waste management strategy. Soil cores (1.8 m in 30-cm sections), groundwater from four wells, and biosolids applied in 2022 were analyzed for PFAS (54 targeted, 17 semi-quantified) using liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry including suspect screening. Total PFAS concentrations decreased with soil depth from 1700 ng/g to 2.06 ng/g. PFAS distribution in 2022 biosolids were 60 mol% perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) precursors and intermediates. The surface soil was dominated by long-chain PFAAs (67-76 mol%) reflecting precursor degradation after biosolids application. Presence of semi-quantified intermediates further reflects precursor degradation in surface soil. Long-chain PFAAs diminished with depth while short-chain PFAAs increased with up to 98 and 96 mol% short-chain PFAAs in the bottom depth and groundwater, respectively. PFAS distribution with depth is consistent with chain-length dependent sorption-impacted transport and the high organic carbon content of the surface soil (15.2 % OC) which subsequently decreased with depth (~2-3 % OC at >60 cm). High organic carbon content in the upper horizon is likely from decades of high biosolids application rates, which contributed to minimizing leaching of long-chain PFAS. While the well within the dedicated land disposal is not drinking water, for comparison only, PFAS concentrations in this well only marginally exceeded the EU drinking water directive for total PFAS and a few individual short-chain PFAS, but did exceed tenfold, the USEPA drinking water standard for PFOA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Linda S Lee reports financial support was provided by U.S. EPA National Priorities program, EPA-G2021-ORD-F1, Grant No. 84024051. Rodrigo Alvarez-Ruiz reports financial support was provided by U.S. EPA National Priorities program, EPA-G2021-ORD-F1, Grant No. 84024051. Youn J. Choi reports financial support was provided by U.S. EPA National Priorities program, EPA-G2021-ORD-F1, Grant No. 84024051. Linda S Lee reports was provided by USDA NIFA Hatch Project 1,006,516. Youn J. Choi reports financial support was provided by USDA NIFA Hatch Project 1,006,516. Linda S Lee reports financial support was provided by Water Research Foundation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF