Search

Introduction: Lebrikizumab is a novel monoclonal antibody with established efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in multiple Phase 3 trials. One of the ultimate treatment goals for patients with moderate-to-severe AD is to achieve stable disease control without concern for planning future life events., Methods: In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, lebrikizumab-treated patients meeting the protocol-defined response criteria at Week 16 were re-randomized 2:2:1 to receive lebrikizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W), lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W), or placebo Q2W (lebrikizumab withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the proportions of patients with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy during the 36-week maintenance period and plotted individual patient trajectories. We defined no or minimal fluctuations as achieving and maintaining the defined endpoint (≥ 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 75], ≥ 90% improvement in EASI, Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥ 4-point improvement, or Pruritus NRS ≥ 3-point improvement) for ≥ 80% of the study visits. If patients used rescue medication, discontinued treatment, or transferred to the escape arm, data collected at or after the event were imputed as non-response., Results: The proportions of lebrikizumab responders who maintained EASI 75 with no or minimal fluctuations were 70.8% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 71.2% (lebrikizumab Q4W), and 60.0% (lebrikizumab withdrawal). Of the patients with baseline Pruritus NRS ≥ 4 and who achieved ≥ 4-point improvement at Week 16, 66.1% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 62.7% (lebrikizumab Q4W), and 55.2% (lebrikizumab withdrawal) maintained ≥ 4-point Pruritus NRS improvement with no or minimal fluctuations., Conclusions: Patients who met the response criteria at Week 16 and continued treatment with lebrikizumab Q2W or Q4W demonstrated a stable response with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy in measures of skin and itch up to Week 52., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04146363 (ADvocate1) and NCT04178967 (ADvocate2)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity IgG4 monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin-13 with high binding affinity and slow dissociation rate, prevents the formation of the interleukin-4Rα/interleukin-13Rα1 heterodimer receptor signaling complex. Here we report the impact of lebrikizumab on responses to two non-live vaccines in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD)., Methods: ADopt-VA (NCT04626297) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 16-week, phase 3 randomized study to assess the impact of lebrikizumab treatment on non-live vaccine immune responses, and efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab compared with placebo. Eligible patients included adults from 18 to 55 years of age with moderate-to-severe chronic AD who were randomly assigned 1:1 to lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks or placebo and stratified according to disease severity. The primary endpoints were the development of a booster response to tetanus toxoid and a positive antibody response to meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV), 4 weeks after administration of the corresponding vaccine., Results: At week 16, 73.6% of patients in the lebrikizumab group (n = 78/106) achieved Tdap booster response compared with 73.4% of patients in the placebo group (n = 58/79). MCV vaccine response was observed in 86.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab group (n = 86/99) and 75.0% of patients in the placebo group (n = 60/80). At week 16, IGA 0,1 with ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline was achieved by 40.6% (n = 51/125) of patients treated with lebrikizumab and 18.9% (n = 23/122) of patients who received placebo (p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of patients achieving EASI 75 at week 16 in the lebrikizumab-treated patients (58.0%, n = 72/125) compared with placebo (32.7%, n = 40/122, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Treatment with lebrikizumab did not impact response to non-live vaccines Tdap and MCV in this study. Lebrikizumab treatment had a significant degree of efficacy compared to placebo across multiple endpoints., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04626297., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Lebrikizumab demonstrated significant improvement versus placebo for measures of skin clearance and patient-reported outcomes at weeks 16 and 52 in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). We report the sustained impact of lebrikizumab monotherapy, over 52 weeks and between visits, on the frequency of itch and sleep loss symptoms, as assessed by Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), in patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, Week-16 lebrikizumab responders (EASI75 or IGA 0/1 with ≥ 2-point improvement and without rescue medication) were randomized to lebrikizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W), every 4 weeks (Q4W), or placebo for 36 weeks. This pooled analysis reports improvement from Week 16 to 52 in patients achieving POEM response 0 (no days) or 1 (1-2 days) for Items 1 (itch) and 2 (sleep disturbance) for the lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W treatment arms. Observed (excluding data collected after treatment discontinuation, rescue medication use, or patient transfer to escape arm) results were reported., Results: At Week 16, for lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W, 35.9% (n = 37/103) and 39.3% (n = 42/107) of patients responded 0 or 1 to Item 1 of POEM (Itch) and 12.6% (n = 13/103) and 12.1% (n = 13/107) responded 0. A total of 66.0% (n = 68/103) and 72.6% (n = 77/106) of patients responded 0 or 1 to Item 2 of POEM (Sleep) and 37.9% (n = 39/103) and 44.3% (n = 47/106) responded 0, respectively. By Week 52, for lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W, 44.6% (n = 29/65) and 48.0% (n = 36/75) responded 0 or 1 to Item 1 of POEM (Itch), and 21.5% (n = 14/65) and 18.7% (n = 14/75) of patients responded 0. A total of 83.1% (n = 54/65) and 78.4% (n = 58/74) responded 0 or 1 to Item 2 of POEM (Sleep), and 67.7% (n = 44/65) and 59.5% (n = 44/74) responded 0, respectively., Conclusion: Weekly POEM responses for itch and sleep disturbance remained stable between doses and visits, and continued to improve from Week 16 through 52, in lebrikizumab-treated patients, demonstrating consistent improvement over time for key AD symptoms., Trial Registration Numbers: ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Sleep loss is a key factor contributing to disease burden in people with atopic dermatitis (AD). Mitigating itch to improve sleep is an important outcome of AD treatment. This study explored the content validity and measurement properties of the Sleep-Loss Scale, a single-item rating scale for assessing itch interference with sleep in clinical trials of AD treatments., Methods: Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 21 adults and adolescents (12-17 years of age) with moderate-to-severe AD to develop a conceptual model of patient experience in AD and explore the content validity of the scale. Data collected from adults with moderate-to-severe AD enrolled in a phase 2b study (NCT03443024) were used to assess Sleep-Loss Scale's psychometric performance, including reliability, construct validity, and ability to detect change. Meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were also determined using anchor-based methods., Results: Qualitative findings from concept elicitation highlighted the importance of sleep-loss related to itch in AD. Debriefing analysis of the Sleep-Loss Scale indicated that the scale was relevant, appropriate, and interpreted as intended. Trial data supported good reliability, construct validity and ability to detect improvement. MWPC was defined as a 1-point improvement using trial data, a finding supported by qualitative data., Conclusions: The Sleep-Loss Scale provides a valid and reliable patient-reported measure of the impact of itch on sleep in patients with AD, and can detect change, indicating it is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the efficacy of AD treatments in moderate-to-severe patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease associated with high rates of emotional and psychosocial distress. The analysis reported here describes the evolution of measures assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms of anxiety and depression up to week 104 in patients who achieved sustained scalp hair regrowth during treatment with baricitinib in the BRAVE-AA phase III trials., Methods: This post-hoc analysis included data from the double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trials BRAVE-AA1 (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03570749) and BRAVE-AA2 (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03899259). Adults with severe AA (defined as a Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score ≥ 50) randomized to baricitinib 4 mg or baricitinib 2 mg at baseline who achieved SALT score ≤ 20 by week 36 and maintained SALT score ≤ 20 through week 104 on the same dose of baricitinib were included in this analysis of integrated data. Scalp hair regrowth (SALT score) and improvements in Skindex-16 AA Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) domain scores were analyzed over the 104-week period using descriptive statistics., Results: In total, 131 patients (88 on baricitinib 4 mg and 43 on baricitinib 2 mg) were included in this analysis. Across the two groups, the mean age (standard deviation) was 37.2 years (12.7), and 84 (64.1%) patients were female. The interquartile range) for time to achieve a SALT score ≤ 20 for patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg and baricitinib 2 mg was 13.1 and 19.6 weeks, respectively. By week 104, 91% (baricitinib 2 mg) and 96% (baricitinib 4 mg) of patients had achieved a SALT score ≤ 10 on baricitinib treatment. In both groups, progressive improvements in the Skindex-16 AA and HADS domain scores were observed up to week 104., Conclusion: This analysis of adults with severe AA treated with baricitinib revealed that achievement of sustained clinically meaningful scalp hair regrowth (SALT score ≤ 20) was associated with improvements in both measures of HRQoL and symptoms of anxiety and depression up to week 104., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease for which signs and symptoms have a negative impact on a patient's quality of life (QoL) and mental health. Here, we assess the impact of lebrikizumab on QoL and mental health after 16 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: Data were analyzed over 16 weeks from two separate phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, monotherapy trials (ADvocate1 and ADvocate2). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the following measures: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS), EQ-5D-5L index scores (UK and US), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety, and PROMIS Depression., Results: Treatment with lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks in two studies led to statistically significant improvements (based on nominal p values) versus placebo in DLQI since week 4 (the first timepoint assessed) for the following measures: change from baseline in DLQI total score (ADvocate1 - 7.8 vs - 2.8; ADvocate2 - 7.3 vs - 3.9), proportion of patients with DLQI ≥ 4-point improvement (ADvocate1 69.5% vs 36.2%; ADvocate2 60.5% vs 42.6%), DLQI total score ≤ 5 (ADvocate1 36.7% vs 8.8%; ADvocate2 29.6% vs 10.8%), and DLQI (0, 1) (ADvocate1 12.3% vs 1.7%; ADvocate2 9.2% vs 1.7%). Improvements in DLQI measures, EQ-5D-5L index scores (UK and US), and EQ-5D-5L VAS were sustained through week 16. Additionally, lebrikizumab improved PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scores, and improvements were higher in patients with at least a mild score (≥ 55) versus placebo for PROMIS Anxiety (ADvocate1 - 7.43 vs - 1.51; ADvocate2 - 4.95 vs - 0.82) and PROMIS Depression (ADvocate1 - 7.42 vs - 2.46; ADvocate2 - 4.28 vs - 2.00)., Conclusions: Treatment with monotherapy 250 mg lebrikizumab for 16 weeks provided clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes related to QoL and mental health for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Lebrikizumab-treated patients reported improvements in DLQI as early as week 4, the first measure since baseline., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NCT04146363 (ADvocate1) and NCT04178967 (ADvocate2)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13, previously demonstrated clinical efficacy in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials that included adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD): ADvocate1, ADvocate2, and ADhere., Aim: This subset analysis evaluated 16-week physician- and patient-reported outcomes of lebrikizumab in the adolescent patients enrolled in these three trials., Methods: Eligible adolescents (≥12 to <18 years weighing ≥40kg) were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous lebrikizumab (500 mg loading doses at baseline and Week 2 followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo as monotherapy in ADvocate1&2, and in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in the ADhere study. Week 16 analyses included clinical efficacy outcomes (IGA (0,1) with ≥2-point improvement, EASI 75, EASI 90), patient-reported Pruritus NRS ≥4-point improvement and Sleep-Loss Scale ≥2-point improvement., Results: Pooled ADvocate1&2 16-week results in lebrikizumab ( N  = 67) vs placebo ( N  = 35) were: IGA (0,1) 46.6% vs 14.3% ( p  < 0.01), EASI 75 62.0% vs 17.3% ( p  < 0.001), EASI 90 40.7% vs 11.5% ( p  < 0.01), Pruritus NRS 48.9% vs 13.1% ( p  < 0.01), and Sleep-Loss Scale 26.9% vs 6.9% ( p  = 0.137). Corresponding results for ADhere, (lebrikizumab + TCS, N  = 32; placebo + TCS, N  = 14), were consistent., Conclusions: Lebrikizumab treatment demonstrated efficacy in improving the signs and symptoms of AD in adolescent patients, consistent with the ADvocate and ADhere overall population results.

Background: Lebrikizumab improved itch, interference of itch on sleep, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), in two Phase 3 trials at 16 weeks compared to placebo., Objectives: We assess improvements in itch and sleep interference due to itch and their impact on QoL measurements after treatment., Methods: Data were analyzed from ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. QoL was evaluated using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16 in patients (>16 years of age) who were itch responders/non-responders (defined as ≥4-point improvement in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale) or Sleep-Loss Scale responders/non-responders (defined as ≥2-point improvement in itch interference on sleep)., Results: In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, significantly greater proportions of itch responders had a clinically meaningful improvement in measures related to QoL (DLQI scores (0/1), ≤5 DLQI total score and ≥4-point DLQI improvement) compared to itch non-responders. In both studies, a significantly greater proportion of Sleep-Loss Scale responders, reported a DLQI score of (0/1), DLQI total score of ≤5 and DLQI improvement of ≥4 points compared to Sleep-Loss Scale non-responders., Conclusions: Improvement in itch and sleep interference due to itch is associated with improvement in the QoL of patients after treatment with lebrikizumab for moderate-to-severe AD., ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04146363 (ADvocate1) and NCT04178967 (ADvocate2).

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis is associated with intense itch, which has been shown to cause sleep disruption that significantly impacts the lives of patients with atopic dermatitis. Despite this, little is known about its burden to the healthcare system and society. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden of itch-related sleep loss in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in the UK., Methods: A literature-based decision-analytic model was developed from a healthcare payer and societal perspective. The model quantifies the economic burden by linking the severity of itch to the number of days of sleep disruption. The model captures the direct costs of healthcare resource utilization and treatment alongside the indirect costs of productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism at work over a 5-year time horizon. The patient population considered was patients aged ≥ 15 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and itch-related sleep disruption., Results: The model estimated that itch-related sleep disruption as a result of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis would affect an average of 821,142 people over the time horizon (2022 to 2026). This translates into an average net economic burden of £3.8 billion (£4687 per patient), with an average of 172 million days being affected by sleep disruption per year in the UK. The greatest contributor to the annual average net economic burden was productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism, each accounting for 34%. The direct costs (treatment costs and healthcare resource use) accounted for 32% of the net economic burden. The results showed a high and gradually increasing economic burden over the 5-year time horizon., Conclusions: Sleep disruption has a high economic burden and reducing itch may provide substantial direct and indirect savings. Quantifying the economic burden of itch-related sleep loss may provide support for analyses to inform public health policies for treatment of atopic dermatitis, particularly within the moderate-to-severe level., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Pruritus, or itch, is a key symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD); as such, mitigating itch is an important outcome of AD treatment. This study explored the content validity and measurement properties of the Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (Pruritus NRS), a novel single-item scale for assessing itch severity in clinical trials of AD treatments., Methods: In this mixed-methods study, qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 people with moderate-to-severe AD (n = 15 adult, n = 6 adolescent) to develop a conceptual model of the patient experience in AD and explore the content validity of the Pruritus NRS. Data collected daily from adults with moderate-to-severe AD enrolled in a phase 2b study (NCT03443024) were used to assess the Pruritus NRS' psychometric performance, including reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. Meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were also determined using anchor-based methods., Results: Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of itch in AD, including severity, persistence, frequency, and daily life interference. Patient debriefing of the Pruritus NRS indicated that the scale was relevant, appropriate, and interpreted as intended. Trial data supported overall good psychometric properties. MWPC was defined as a 3-point improvement in Pruritus NRS score, a finding supported by qualitative data., Conclusions: The Pruritus NRS provides a valid and reliable patient-reported measure of itching severity in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, and can detect change, indicating it is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the efficacy of AD treatments in this population., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03443024., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest see Appendix S1 for the full Conflicts of Interest statement.

Introduction: This post hoc analysis assessed association between scalp hair regrowth and improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological burden in patients with severe alopecia areata (AA)., Methods: Data were pooled from two phase-3 trials ( N  = 1200). Patients randomized to once-daily placebo, baricitinib 2-mg, or 4-mg were analyzed independently of treatment allocation, and categorized according to scalp hair regrowth (at Week 36): meaningful regrowth (Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20); intermediate regrowth (≥30% SALT improvement [SALT 30 ] at any post-baseline visit to Week 36, but SALT score > 20 at Week 36); no/minimal regrowth (never achieved SALT 30 ). Skindex-16 for AA score change-from-baseline and proportion of patients with baseline Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores ≥8 that shifted to <8 (normal) were assessed., Results: Patients with meaningful regrowth achieved greater improvements in all Skindex-16 AA domains versus no/minimal regrowth. More patients with meaningful versus no/minimal regrowth shifted from HADS ≥8 to <8 (anxiety:46.8% versus 26.4%; depression:52.3% versus 24.0%). Improvements occurred with intermediate regrowth but to a lesser extent versus meaningful regrowth., Conclusions: Patients with severe AA and scalp hair regrowth at Week 36 experienced greater improvements in HRQoL and anxiety and depression versus patients with no/minimal regrowth. The highest benefit was observed in patients with meaningful regrowth (SALT score ≤20). ClinicalTrials.gov listing: NCT03570749 and NCT03899259.

Objective: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have low treatment satisfaction. In this study, we evaluated the humanistic burden, treatment satisfaction, and treatment expectations in patients with AD in the United States., Methods: Adults with AD recruited through the National Eczema Association and clinical sites completed a web-based survey comprising the Patient-Oriented SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD), Dermatology Life Quality Index; Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Atopic Dermatitis; Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); and answered questions on healthcare provider (HCP) visits, treatment history, and treatment goals. Descriptive analyses were performed to compare participants by severity., Results: Among 186 participants (mean [standard deviation] age 39.7 [15.3] years, 79.6% female), 26.9%, 44.6%, and 26.3% of the participants had mild, moderate, or severe AD, respectively, based on PO-SCORAD. Greater disease severity was associated with a greater impact on work and daily life, decreased TSQM scores, and increased HCP visits. Corticosteroid topical cream or ointment (53.8%) and oral antihistamines (31.2%) were most commonly used for the treatment of AD. Participants reported declining/stopping/changing AD treatment due to the potential for side effects or lack of efficacy. 'Leading normal lives' (28.0%) and 'being itch-free' (33.9%) were important treatment goals., Conclusions: Individuals with AD, especially severe disease, face a considerable humanistic burden even while using treatment.

Background: Patients who completed the originating studies, BREEZE-AD1 (NCT03334396), BREEZE-AD2(NCT03334422), and BREEZE-AD7 (NCT03733301), were eligible for enrollment in the multicenter,phase-3, long-term extension study BREEZE-AD3 (NCT03334435)., Methods: At week 52, responders and partial responders to baricitinib 4 mg were re-randomized (1:1) into the sub-study to dose continuation (4 mg, N = 84), or dose down-titration (2 mg, N = 84). Maintenance of response was assessed from week 52 to 104 of BREEZE-AD3. Physician-rated outcomes included vIGA-AD (0,1), EASI75, and mean change from baseline in EASI. Patient-reported outcomes included DLQI, P OEM total score, HADS, and from baseline: WPAI (presenteeism, absenteeism, overall work impairment, daily activity impairment) and change from baseline in SCORAD itch and sleep loss., Results: With continuous treatment with baricitinib 4 mg, efficacy was maintained up to week 104 in vIGA-AD (0,1), EASI75, EASI mean change from baseline, SCORAD itch, SCORAD sleep loss, DLQI, P OEM, HADS, and WPAI (all scores). Patients down-titrated to 2 mg maintained most of their improvements in each of these measures., Conclusion: The sub-study of BREEZE AD3 supports flexibility in baricitinib dosing regimens. Patients who continued treatment with baricitinib 4 mg and down-titrated to 2 mg maintained improvements in skin, itch, sleep, and quality of life for up to 104 weeks.

Background: Real-world data on the effectiveness of systemic therapy in atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited., Methods: Adult patients with AD in the CorEvitas AD registry (2020-2021) who received systemic therapies for 4-12 months prior to enrollment were included based on disease severity: body surface area (BSA) 0%-9% and BSA ≥10%. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Pairwise effect sizes (ES) were used to compare BSA groups., Results: The study included 308 patients (BSA 0%-9%: 246 [80%]; BSA ≥10%: 62 [20%]). Despite systemic therapy, both BSA groups reported the use of additional topical therapy and the presence of lesions at difficult locations. Moderate-to-severe AD (vIGA-AD ® ) was reported by 11% (BSA 0%-9%) and 66% (BSA ≥10%; ES = 0.56) of patients. Mean disease severity scores: total BSA (2% and 22%; ES = 3.59), EASI (1.1 and 11.1; ES = 2.60), and SCORAD (12.1 and 38.0; ES = 1.99). Mean scores for PROs: DLQI (3.7 and 7.5; ES = 0.75), and peak pruritus (2.2 and 4.5; ES = 0.81). Inadequate control of AD was seen in 27% and 53% of patients (ES = 0.23)., Conclusions: Patients with AD experience a high disease burden despite systemic treatment for 4-12 months. This study provides potential evidence of suboptimal treatment and the need for additional effective treatment options for AD.

Introduction: This real-world, cross-sectional study compared sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among racial/ethnic groups in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy., Methods: This study included adults with dermatologist- or dermatology practitioner-diagnosed AD enrolled in the CorEvitas AD Registry (July 2020-July 2021). All patients initiated systemic therapy within 12 months prior to or at enrollment or had moderate-to-severe AD (vIGA-AD ®  ≥ 3 and Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] ≥ 12) at enrollment. Patients were categorized into five mutually exclusive racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White, Black, Asian, Other/Multiracial, and Hispanic (any race). Patient, clinical, and treatment characteristics were captured at enrollment. Differences in means or proportions of characteristics among racial/ethnic groups were descriptively summarized using effect sizes. Adjusted prevalence ratios and mean differences were estimated (White race/ethnicity group as the reference category) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Among 1288 patients, 64% (n = 822) were White, 13% (n = 167) Black, 10% (n = 129) Asian, 8% (n = 97) Hispanic, and 6% (n = 73) Other/Multiracial. In adjusted analyses, statistically more severe EASI lichenification was noted among Black compared with White patients at the head and neck (mean difference, 0.21, [95% CI 0.06, 0.36]; p = 0.01), trunk (0.32, [0.17, 0.47]; p < 0.001), upper extremities (0.27, [0.09, 0.44]; p = 0.008), and lower extremities (0.39, [0.21, 0.57]; p < 0.001). Statistically more severe EASI lichenification was observed among Asian vs White patients in certain areas (mean difference, head and neck, 0.22 [0.04, 0.39], p = 0.01; trunk, 0.25 [0.07, 0.43], p < 0.001; lower extremities, 0.22 [0.01, 0.43], p < 0.001) and SCORing for AD lichenification (mean difference: 0.34 [0.15, 0.52]; p < 0.001). Significantly higher mean pruritus over the past 7 days for Black (mean difference: 0.63 [0.01, 1.26] and Hispanic patients (0.60 [0.11, 1.09]; p = 0.03) vs White patients was observed. Among AD clinical features, the prevalence of facial erythema was significantly lower among Black compared with White patients (prevalence ratio = 0.38, [0.22, 0.67]; p = 0.007)., Conclusion: Racial/ethnic differences exist in sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics, disease severity, and PROs among real-world AD patients who are candidates for systemic therapy. Recognizing these variations may be of critical importance for dermatologists for the design and delivery of targeted/personalized medicine approaches., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The physical impact of alopecia areata (AA) is visible, but the psychological and social consequences and emotional burden are often underrecognized., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 547 participants recruited via the National Alopecia Areata Foundation completed a survey encompassing demographics; AA illness characteristics; and five patient-reported outcome measures on anxiety and depression, perceived stress, psychological illness impact, stigma, and quality of life (QoL). Differences in disease severity subgroups were assessed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t tests., Results: Mean age was 44.6 years, and 76.6% were female. Participants with more severe hair loss tended to report longer duration of experiencing AA symptoms (P < 0.001). Overall, participants reported negative psychological impact, emotional burden, and poor QoL due to AA. Participants with 21-49% or 50-94% scalp hair loss reported greater psychological impact and poorer QoL than those with 95-100% scalp hair loss (most parameters P < 0.05). Similar results were observed for eyebrow/eyelash involvement subgroups., Conclusions: These results suggest that participants with AA experience emotional burden, negative self-perception, and stigma, but the impact of AA is not dependent solely on the amount of hair loss. Lower impact among participants with 95-100% scalp hair loss may indicate that they have adapted to living with AA., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with limited treatment options for adolescents with moderate-to-severe disease. Lebrikizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-13, demonstrated clinical benefit in previous Phase 3 trials: ADvocate1 (NCT04146363), ADvocate2 (NCT04178967), and ADhere (NCT04250337). We report 52-week safety and efficacy outcomes from ADore (NCT04250350), a Phase 3, open-label study of lebrikizumab in adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The primary endpoint was to describe the proportion of patients who discontinued from study treatment because of adverse events (AEs) through the last treatment visit., Methods: Adolescent patients (N = 206) (≥ 12 to < 18 years old, weighing ≥ 40 kg) with moderate-to-severe AD received subcutaneous lebrikizumab 500 mg loading doses at baseline and Week 2, followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) thereafter. Safety was monitored using reported AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, vital signs, growth assessments, and laboratory testing. Efficacy analyses included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Body Surface Area (BSA), (Children's) Dermatology Life Quality Index ((C)DLQI), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety, and PROMIS Depression., Results: 172 patients completed the treatment period. Low frequencies of SAEs (n = 5, 2.4%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (n = 5, 2.4%) were reported. Overall, 134 patients (65%) reported at least one treatment-emergent AE (TEAE), most being mild or moderate in severity. In total, 62.6% achieved IGA (0,1) with ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline and 81.9% achieved EASI-75 by Week 52. The EASI mean percentage improvement from baseline to Week 52 was 86.0%. Mean BSA at baseline was 45.4%, decreasing to 8.4% by Week 52. Improvements in mean change from baseline (CFB) to Week 52 were observed in DLQI (baseline 12.3; CFB - 8.9), CDLQI (baseline 10.1; CFB - 6.5), PROMIS Anxiety (baseline 51.5; CFB - 6.3), and PROMIS Depression (baseline 49.3; CFB - 3.4) scores., Conclusions: Lebrikizumab 250 mg Q2W had a safety profile consistent with previous trials and significantly improved AD symptoms and quality of life, with meaningful responses at Week 16 increasing by Week 52., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04250350., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Lebrikizumab is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab monotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) over 52 weeks of treatment in ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967)., Methods: Patients who responded to lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) at the end of the 16-week induction period were re-randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab 250 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or placebo Q2W (lebrikizumab withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. Response at week 16 was defined as achieving a 75% reduction in Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI 75) or an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1, with a ≥ 2-point improvement and no rescue medication use. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Intermittent use of topical therapy was permitted during the maintenance period., Results: After 52 weeks, an IGA of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2 point improvement was maintained by 71.2% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 76.9% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 47.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm. EASI 75 was maintained by 78.4% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 81.7% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 66.4% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm at week 52. Across treatment arms, proportions of patients using any rescue therapy were 14.0% (ADvocate1) and 16.4% (ADvocate2). During the combined induction and maintenance periods of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, 63.0% of lebrikizumab-treated patients reported any treatment emergent adverse event, with most events (93.1%) being mild or moderate in severity., Conclusions: After a 16-week induction period with lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W maintained similar improvement of the signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD, with a safety profile consistent with previously published data., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest A.B. has served as a speaker (received honoraria) for AbbVie, Arcutis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi and UCB; served as a scientific adviser (received honoraria) for AbbVie, Abcentra, Affibody, Aligos, Almirall, Alumis, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Arena, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Athenex, Bluefin Biomedicine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant, EcoR1, Eli Lilly and Company, Escient, Evelo, Evommune, Forte, Galderma, HighlightII Pharma, Incyte, InnoventBio, Janssen, Landos, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Spherix Global Insights, Sun Pharma, TLL Pharmaceutical, TrialSpark, UCB Pharma, Vibliome and Xencor; and has acted as a clinical study investigator (institution has received clinical study funds) for AbbVie, ACELYRIN, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Concert, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Evelo, Evommune, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma. J.P.T. is an advisor for AbbVie, Almirall, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Coloplast, OM Pharma, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Union Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi Genzyme; a speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Eli Lilly and Company, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi Genzyme; and has received research grants from Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi Genzyme. E.G.-Y. is a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Asana Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Celgene, Concert, DBV, Dermira, DS Biopharma, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Escalier, Galderma, Glenmark, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Pfizer, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sienna Biopharma and Union Therapeutics; and reports institute grants for research from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Asana Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dermavant, DS Biopharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Glenmark, Galderma, Innovaderm, Janssen, Kiniska, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Novan, Pfizer, Ralexar, Regeneron, Sienna Biopharma, UCB and Union Therapeutics. T.B. has been a speaker and/or consultant and/or investigator for AbbVie, Affibody, Almirall, AnaptysBio, Arena, Asana Biosciences, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Health, BioVerSys, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Connect Pharma, Dermavant, Domain Therapeutics, EQRx, Galderma, Glenmark, GSK, Incyte, Innovaderm, IQVIA, Janssen, Kirin, Kymab, LEO Pharma, LG Chem, Lilly, L’Oréal, MSD, Novartis, Numab, OM Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Q32bio, RAPT, Sanofi/Regeneron and UCB; he is the founder and chairman of the board of the nonprofit biotechnology company Davos Biosciences. E.S.-B. has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AbbVie, Novartis, Almirall, LEO Pharma, Sanofi, Pfizer and Eli Lilly and Company. E.S. reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Boston Consulting Group, Collective Acumen (CA, USA), Dermira, Eli Lilly and Company, Evidera, Excerpta Medica, Forte Bio RX, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, LEO Pharma, Medscape, Merck, Pfizer, Physicians World, Regeneron, Roivant, Sanofi Genzyme, Trevi Therapeutics, Valeant and WebMD. These potential conflicts of interest have been reviewed and managed by Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). E.S. reports grants from (or served as principal investigator for) AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, CorEvitas, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Kymab, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi and TARGET-DERM. These potential conflicts of interest have been reviewed and managed by OHSU. D.R. has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Abcuro, AltruBio, Arena, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Concert, CSL Behring, Dermavant, Dermira, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB and VielaBio; has received research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Dermira, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and has served as a paid speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Incyte, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi. H.E., E.M., C.R.N., Z.L., C.X., E.P. and M.M.-C. are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. E.G.G. is an employee of Almirall S.A. J.I.S. has received grants and/or personal fees from AbbVie, AFYX Therapeutics, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Asana BioSciences, Bluefin, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly and Company, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Kiniksa, LEO Pharma, Luna Pharma, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron and Sanofi., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Baricitinib demonstrated efficacy in treating adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in Phase 3 clinical trials., Objective: To examine long-term efficacy of baricitinib combined with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in adult patients from a Phase 3 study, BREEZE-AD7 (NCT03733301), enrolled in ongoing extension study, BREEZE-AD3 (NCT03334435)., Methods: Upon BREEZE-AD7 completion, responders or partial responders (RPR [vIGA-AD™ ≤2]) receiving baricitinib 2-mg or 4-mg + TCS maintained their original treatment doses in BREEZE-AD3. Nonresponders (NR; vIGA-AD 3,4) receiving baricitinib 2-mg were rerandomized 1:1 to baricitinib 2-mg or 4-mg; NR receiving baricitinib 4-mg remained on same dose. Integrated data from all patients (RPR + NR = baricitinib 4-mg intent-to-treat [ITT] cohort) receiving continuous baricitinib 4-mg in BREEZE-AD7 through BREEZE-AD3 were analysed, along with baricitinib 4-mg or 2-mg RPR cohorts. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with vIGA-AD (0,1) at Weeks 16, 36 and 52 (Weeks 32, 52 and 68 of continuous therapy). Additional outcomes included improvement in EASI75 and Itch NRS (up to Week 32). Missing data were imputed by last observation carried forward., Results: In baricitinib 4-mg ITT cohort (N = 102), proportions of patients achieving vIGA-AD (0,1) at Week 32, Week 52, and Week 68 were 21.6%, 26.5% and 23.5%; EASI75 were 46.1%, 40.2% and 43.1%, respectively. Itch NRS ≥4-point improvement (Itch ≥4) were 47.3% at Week 16 and 40.6% at Week 32. In baricitinib 4-mg RPR cohort (N = 63), proportions of patients achieving vIGA-AD (0,1) at Week 32, Week 52 and Week 68 were 31.7%, 33.3% 34.9%, respectively; EASI75 were 57.1%, 49.2% and 49.2%, respectively. Itch ≥4 were 53.6% at Week 16 and 46.4% at Week 32. Corresponding proportions for baricitinib 2-mg RPR cohort (N = 53) for vIGA-AD (0,1) were 39.6%, 45.3% and 30.2%; EASI75 were 77.4%, 69.8% and 58.5%, respectively. Itch ≥4 were 56.3% at Week 16 and 47.9% at Week 32., Conclusion: Baricitinib 4-mg and 2-mg combined with TCS maintained clinically meaningful sustained efficacy over 68 weeks of continuous treatment., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Importance: Lebrikizumab (LEB), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-13, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) during 16 weeks of monotherapy in a phase 2b trial, and two 52-week phase 3 trials., Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of LEB combined with low- to mid-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Design, Setting, and Participants: The ADhere trial was a 16-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo (PBO)-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from February 3, 2020, to September 16, 2021. The study was conducted at 54 outpatient sites across Germany, Poland, Canada, and the US and included adolescent (aged ≥12 to <18 years weighing ≥40 kg) and adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The treatment allocation ratio was 2:1 (LEB:PBO)., Interventions: Overall, 211 patients were randomized to subcutaneous LEB (loading dose of 500 mg at baseline and week 2, followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W] thereafter) or PBO Q2W in combination with TCS for 16 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy analyses at week 16 included proportions of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA [0,1]) with 2 or more points improvement from baseline, and 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Key secondary end points included evaluation of itch, itch interference on sleep, and quality of life. Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events (AEs)., Results: The mean (SD) age of patients was 37.2 (19.3) years, 103 (48.8%) patients were women, 31 (14.7%) patients were Asian, and 28 (13.3%) patients were Black/African American. At week 16, IGA (0,1) was achieved by 145 (41.2%) patients in the LEB+TCS group vs 66 (22.1%) receiving PBO+TCS (P = .01); corresponding proportions of patients achieving EASI-75 were 69.5% vs 42.2% (P < .001). The LEB+TCS group showed statistically significant improvements in all key secondary end points. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nonserious, mild or moderate in severity, and did not lead to study discontinuation. The TEAEs frequently reported in the LEB+TCS group included conjunctivitis (7 [4.8%]), headache (7 [4.8%]), hypertension (4 [2.8%]), injection site reactions (4 [2.8%]), and herpes infection (5 [3.4%]) vs 1.5% or less patient-reported frequencies in the PBO+TCS group. Similar frequencies of patient-reported serious AEs following LEB+TCS (n = 2, 1.4%) and PBO+TCS (n = 1, 1.5%)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial, LEB+TCS was associated with improved outcomes in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD compared with TCS alone, and safety was consistent with previously reported AD trials., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04250337.

To address the need for long-term efficacy and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with baricitinib 2 mg, a study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib 2 mg in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Data presented here provided efficacy and outcomes data for patients treated for 52 weeks. Patients who participated in the originating study, BREEZE-AD5 (NCT03435081), and met additional eligibility criteria could enroll in the multicenter, open-label, Phase 3, long-term extension study BREEZE-AD6 (NCT03559270). Patients received baricitinib 2 mg for the duration of BREEZE-AD6. In BREEZE-AD6, the proportion of patients who achieved a 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) and validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD™) of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) were assessed through 52 weeks, in addition to several PROs. At week 52, the proportion of patients treated with baricitinib 2 mg daily achieving EASI75 was 48.6% (70/144), and 31.3% (45/144) of patients achieved a vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear). Improvements in PROs such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD, itch and sleep) scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) total score, and DLQI ≤5 response were observed, and these responses were sustained through 52 weeks. Long-term efficacy of baricitinib in patients with AD was demonstrated by both clinician and patient-reported outcome measures., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Itch and sleep disturbance due to itch are burdensome symptoms associated with atopic dermatitis (AD). Rapid onset of action is important for AD treatments to improve quality of life and relieve suffering., Objectives: This subanalysis evaluated how quickly baricitinib 1-mg and 2-mg reduced itch and associated sleep disturbance during the first 7 days after treatment initiation in a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial., Methods: Adult patients with AD were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo ( N = 147), baricitinib 1 mg ( N = 147) or baricitinib 2 mg ( N = 146). Patients kept daily diaries, completing the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (itch severity from 0 = no itch to 10 = worst itch imaginable) and the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS) to measure sleep disturbance (number of nighttime awakenings because of itch). Mixed model repeated measures analysis was used to analyze change from day 1 to day 7 values., Results: Patients receiving either dose of baricitinib had a 9.9% decrease in itch NRS scores from baseline to Day 2 vs 1.5% decrease for placebo (significant between-group least squares mean [LSM] difference: 8.3; 95% CI -12.66 to -3.89; P = .0002). Baricitinib 2 mg reduced nighttime awakenings due to itch (ADSS item 2) at day 2 by 25.2% vs 3.9% in the placebo group (between-group LSM difference: -21.4, P = .0025). Baricitinib 2 mg continued to demonstrate a statistically significant difference from placebo in sleep symptoms at day 7 (LSM difference -23.9; P = .001)., Conclusions: Baricitinib 2-mg provided relief from itching and sleep disturbance in patients with AD, beginning the day after taking first dose.Clinical trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov: BREEZE-AD5 (NCT03435081).

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease causing a variety of dermatologic signs and symptoms, affecting patient&rsquo;s quality of life. While treatment options are available, they are of variable effectiveness. This study sought to characterize patient-reported AD signs and symptoms, flare, and associated bother, by disease severity and control., Methods: Adults diagnosed with AD were recruited through the National Eczema Association (NEA) and clinical sites and completed a web-based survey including the Patient-Oriented SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD), Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP), and Skin Pain numeric rating scale (NRS), as well as questions on previous/current clinical presentation, flare frequency and severity, past/ present AD treatment, and sociodemographic characteristics., Results: A total of 186 participants completed the survey (mean age 39.7 years, 80% female). The most frequently reported current AD signs and symptoms included dryness, itch, redness, roughness, and flaking skin, and the most bothersome were itch, dryness, and redness (63%). The majority of participants (84%) were either currently experiencing a flare or had experienced one within the past month. The most common signs and symptoms that grew worse during the most recent flare were itch and redness across all disease severity groups. Participants most often experienced one to three flares in the last three months. Flare frequency, duration, and average severity increased with greater disease severity and lack of disease control., Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the diverse and considerable symptomatic burden experienced by people with AD, even while being treated for AD. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(11):1222-1230. doi:10.36849/JDD.6329.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is considered a childhood illness, and the direct and indirect health care burden of atopic dermatitis in adults is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To measure the direct and indirect costs of atopic dermatitis among adults in 2018. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared commercial and Medicare-insured adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 with directly matched (1:3) adults without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis prevalence was reported. Health care utilization, direct health care costs, and work loss data were compared between cohorts. This analysis was repeated for adults with atopic dermatitis in 2016 and 2017. RESULTS: 31,164 adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 were identified and directly matched (1:3) to controls. Adults with atopic dermatitis had greater utilization of outpatient services, outpatient pharmacy services, and short-term disability benefits than controls. Unadjusted annual health care costs in 2018 were $4,979 higher for adults with atopic dermatitis ($14,603) than for the matched controls ($9,624), driven by outpatient services and pharmacy. Findings were supported by analyses of adults from 2016 and 2017 and multivariable analyses. One limitation of this study was that patients with mild cases of atopic dermatitis may not seek medical treatment and may be underrepresented in the study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The direct health care and indirect (short-term disability) health care costs of atopic dermatitis present a significant health care burden among the adult population. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Employees of Eli Lilly were involved in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the study. Pierce is employed by Eli Lilly and Company. Boytsov and Goldblum were employed by Eli Lilly and Company Health at the time this research was conducted. Manjelievskaia and Brouillette are employed by IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study. Bonafede and Onyekwere were employed at IBM Watson Health at the time this research was conducted.

Introduction: Real-world disease management of atopic dermatitis (AD) is hampered by a lack of consistency between providers that treat AD regarding assessment of severity, disease activity, and quality of life. Variability and inconsistency in documentation makes it difficult to understand the impact of AD. This study summarizes AD-related symptoms and concerns captured in unstructured qualitative provider notes by healthcare providers during visits with patients with AD., Methods: Provider notes were obtained for patients with AD (n = 133,025) from a USA-based ambulatory electronic health records system. The sample included both children (n = 69,551) and adults at least 18 years of age (n = 63,474) receiving treatment from a variety of specialties including primary care, dermatology, and allergy/immunology. Key skin-related words were identified from a review of a sample of notes and natural language processing (NLP) was applied to determine the frequency of the keywords and bigram patterns., Results: Provider notes largely focused on symptoms (primarily itch) and symptom relief rather than the impact of AD on work or lifestyle. Despite the known relationship between itch and skin pain, neuralgia was not widely documented. Compared to primary care providers, dermatologists' and allergist/immunologists' notes had more documentation of symptom-related issues. Personal and work/life burden issues were not widely documented regardless of specialty., Conclusion: The topics documented in case notes by healthcare providers about their patients with AD focus largely on symptoms and, to a lesser extent, treatment, but do not reflect the burden of AD on patients' lives. This finding highlights a potential care gap that warrants further investigation., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Burdensome symptoms of atopic dermatitis include itch and sleep disturbance. This post hoc analysis reports the effect of baricitinib on itch and sleep disturbance during the first week of treatment in 3 phase 3 studies., Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1:1:1 to once-daily placebo or baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg in the BREEZE-AD1 and -AD2 studies and 1:1:1 to once-daily placebo or baricitinib 2 mg or 4 mg in the BREEZE-AD7 study. Topical corticosteroids were only allowed in BREEZE-AD7. Patients completed the itch numerical rating scale and atopic dermatitis sleep scale (ADSS) items 1-3 using an electronic daily diary. Data were analyzed by study as least squares mean percent change from baseline in daily scores for the randomized patients. Mixed model repeated measures analysis was used to analyze change from baseline values., Results: A total of 624, 615, and 329 patients were randomized in BREEZE-AD1, -AD2, and -AD7, respectively. Itch severity significantly improved with baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg versus placebo starting at day 2 (1 day after first dose) in BREEZE-AD1 and -AD7 and at day 1 in BREEZE-AD2. Patients' ability to fall asleep (ADSS item 1) significantly improved with baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg versus placebo starting at day 2 in all three studies. There were significant improvements in patients waking due to itch (ADSS item 2) with baricitinib 4 mg versus placebo starting at day 2 in all three studies. Patients' ability to return to sleep after being woken by itch (ADSS item 3) was significantly improved with baricitinib 4 mg versus placebo starting at day 2 in BREEZE-AD1 and -AD2 and at day 4 in BREEZE-AD7., Conclusion: Rapid onset of action, typically 1 day after taking the first dose of baricitinib, was observed consistently for the burdensome symptoms of itch and sleep disturbance. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifiers: BREEZE-AD1, NCT03334396; BREEZE-AD2, NCT03334422; BREEZE-AD7, NCT03733301.

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the risk of VTE among this population is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of VTE among adults with AD and compare the risk vs. matched non-AD controls., Methods: This retrospective study used claims data from the IBM Watson MarketScan ® Commercial Claims and Encounters, Medicare Supplemental, and Medicaid databases to identify adults aged 18 years or older with AD. Incidence rates (IR) per 100 person-years (PY) of VTE were reported for three cohorts: overall AD, moderate-to-severe AD, and non-AD controls matched by age, sex, and calendar time to the overall cohort. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for VTE risk., Results: Overall, 198,685 patients with AD were identified. Crude VTE IRs were 0.24 for AD overall, 0.31 for moderate-to-severe AD, and 0.25 for non-AD controls. VTE risk was similar in patients with AD vs. non-AD controls (partially adjusted HR 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.09). VTE risk was greater in patients with moderate-to-severe AD vs. non-AD controls in partially adjusted models (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.13, 1.36), but not after adjustment for healthcare use and VTE risk factors (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85, 1.07)., Conclusions: AD was not an independent risk factor for VTE, and the risk of VTE among patients with AD was low. These findings provide valuable context for understanding VTE risk among patients with AD, which is particularly relevant as advanced therapies for the treatment of moderate to severe AD, such as janus kinase inhibitors, become available.

Introduction: A number of treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) are available; however, long-term treatment patterns and healthcare consumption in patients with AD are poorly described., Methods: We conducted a registry-based longitudinal drug utilization study among Danish patients with AD that were referred to their first-ever visit at hospital-based dermatology clinics. Their first visit was in the period between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2012, and patients were followed up to 5 years after their first visit., Results: In total, 8213 people with a first-time hospital dermatologist contact for AD were included in the study (3514 aged 0-9 years, 1501 aged 10-19 years, 3198 aged 20 years or older). At first visit, a baseline history of moderately potent topical corticosteroid (TCS) use was seen among 46.6% of children (0-9 years), whereas potent or very potent TCS use was more frequently among older individuals (e.g., 51.1% and 25.6% of people aged 50 years or older had used potent and very potent TCS, respectively). The median (interquartile range) annual number of visits to general practitioners was 4 (2-7) for children and 5 (2-8) for adults, in the 12 months prior to referral. Three years after referral, these numbers had decreased to 2 (1-4) and 3 (1-6), respectively. In the first year after referral, 6% of patients were prescribed systemic corticosteroids, whereas other systemic therapies were used in 5% or less., Conclusions: After referral, low proportions of patients received systemic treatment, or potent TCS. These findings highlight considerable differences in treatment patterns between general practitioners and private practice dermatologists, compared with hospital-based dermatologists, and emphasize the need for better adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Little is currently known about possible associations between disease specific characteristics of atopic dermatitis (AD) and use of medical treatments. We explored the use of AD treatments within the past 12 months in Danish adults according to distinct patient characteristics. Patients who had received a diagnosis of AD in a hospital in- or outpatient setting as adults were surveyed and data cross-linked to a national prescription registry. AD severity was measured by the Patient-Oriented SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD). A total of 3834 patients participated. Use of topical medication in the past 12 months increased with increasing AD severity, whereas no difference was observed for systemic medication use. Positive associations between AD in the face and neck, and use of mild and moderately potent topical corticosteroids were observed, while involvement of palms and chest was associated with use of more potent topical corticosteroids. The mean DLQI, skin pain, and itch severity scores were lower in patients managed only with topical corticosteroids (5.5, 3.2, and 4.3, respectively) compared to patients treated with both oral and topical medication (7.1, 3.8, and 5.0, respectively). Patients with frequent topical corticosteroid use tended to be older (50.7 vs 48.6 years), males (50.0% vs 33.6%), current daily smokers (17.3% vs 13.7%), and having asthma (59.1% vs 43.8%) compared with infrequent users of topical corticosteroids. We found a disconnect between the severity of AD signs and symptoms, and use of AD therapies. In particular, a very modest use of systemic immunosuppressants was seen even among patients with severe AD symptoms. However, the underlying clinical decisions and reasons behind this disconnect is not clear based on the current data., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) has a negative impact on patients&rsquo; quality of life (QoL)., Objective: To report the impact of specific AD lesion locations on QoL in adult patients with AD using real-world data., Methods: The Adelphi US Disease Specific Programme was conducted between January&ndash;April 2018. Physicians documented patient demographics/characteristics, AD lesion locations, and body surface area; patients completed questionnaires reporting the impact of lesion locations on QoL., Results: AD severity was moderate in 51.6% of patients and severe in 6.0%. Lesions were commonly identified in more than one location. All AD lesion locations impacted QoL. Visible areas were most bothersome, including head/neck (68%), hands/fingers (58%), front (30%), upper extremities (22%), and lower extremities (16%), with statistically significant associations for a number of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) items. Itch, soreness, pain, and stinging are also associated with a number of body areas but in particular with those that are most visible/accessible. Lesions on the head/neck and hands/fingers (58%) demonstrated an increased impact on the anxiety and depression dimension of the EuroQol 5-Dimension tool., Conclusions: In patients with AD, quality of life was most affected in patients with lesions in visible areas, including head/neck, hands/fingers, and upper extremities, with statistically significant associations for a number of DLQI domains. Physicians should be aware of the burden of AD lesions on QoL and consider having conversations with patients to better understand the impact of these lesions. Prior presentation: 28th Annual European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Congress; 9&ndash;13 October 2019, Madrid, Spain. Poster number P0233.J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(10): 943-948. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5422.

Background: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon but severe extra-intestinal manifestation (EIM) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The incidence and risk factors for PG are disputed., Aims: To assess the incidence of PG and identify factors associated with PG in IBD patients., Methods: A search of electronic databases (Ovid and PubMed) was conducted between 1966 and 2019. Studies that calculated the incidence of PG in IBD patient cohorts were included. Patient demographics, IBD subtype, and EIM presence were recorded. A review of our institutional database of 1057 IBD patients was conducted. A multivariate regression model and meta-analysis were conducted to identify risk factors for PG. A random effects model was used to combine the data of included studies., Results: Fourteen studies were included in addition to 1057 IBD patients and 26 PG cases from the Louisville cohort. In total, there were 379 cases of PG in the cumulative cohort of 61,695 IBD patients. The PG incidence in individual studies ranged from 0.4 to 2.6%. In the institutional cohort, ocular EIMs and a permanent stoma were significant risk factors for PG. In the meta-analysis, PG was associated with female gender (RR = 1.328, 95% CI 1.161-1.520), Crohn's disease (RR = 1.193, 95% CI 1.001-1.422), erythema nodosum (RR = 9.281, 95% CI 6.081-14.164), and ocular EIM (RR = 4.55, 95% CI 3.04-6.81). There was study heterogeneity when assessing IBD subtype, ocular, and joint EIMs., Conclusions: There are conflicting data on the incidence and risk factors for PG. This meta-analysis confirms an association between PG and female gender, Crohn's disease, erythema nodosum, and ocular EIM that have been described in smaller studies.