Search

Aim: To evaluate R0/R1 resection rate in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) treated with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI after failure of a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen in daily clinical practice., Methods: This French, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort (NCT05178745) included patients with CLM (alone or predominant; up to 5 lung nodules <2 cm allowed) initiating aflibercept plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks per physician choice. Primary endpoint was R0/R1 resection rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), radiological and pathological responses, and safety., Results: A total of 137 patients (median age 65 years, RAS/BRAF mutant 57 %/9 %) were enrolled at 22 French sites. CLM (median 4) were synchronous in 82 %, bilobar in 71 % and located in liver only in 54 %. Overall, 17 % of patients had R0/R1 resection (21 % for patients with liver-only disease). A major pathological response per Blazer score was observed in 55 % of resected patients, along with significantly longer OS (median 34.8 vs 9.1 months, p < 0.0001) and PFS (median 11.4 vs 4.9 months, p < 0.0001) compared to non-resected patients. Post-operative complications occurred in 17 % of patients (all Dindo-Clavien grade I-II) and there was no post-operative deaths. Overall, 34 % had grade ≥ 3 adverse events, mainly general health deterioration and diarrhea., Conclusions: Results suggest that aflibercept plus FOLFIRI, after failure of a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen, allows R0/R1 resection of CLM in almost 20 % of patients with a major pathological response in most cases and a median OS prolonged by more than 3-fold versus non-resected patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: DT reports consultancy, advisory fees, honoraria from Servier, Pierre Fabre, Merck Serono, MSD, BMS, AZ, Roche, Sanofi; research funding from Sandoz, AstraZenenca, Servier, MSD; travel grants from Pierre Fabre, MSD, Servier, Roche. BC reports Honoraria from Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Merck, BMS, SeqOne Genomics, Pierre Fabre and consulting or advisory fees from Bayer, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi. JMP reports consultancy, advisory fees, honoraria from Servier, Pierre Fabre, Merck Serono, MSD, BMS, Astra-Zeneca, Takeda, Roche, Sanofi, Amgen. TL received honoraria for speaking or consulting role from Servier, Pierre Fabre, Merck Serono, BMS, Astra Zeneca, AAA, Sanofi, IPSEN, Novartis, CHUGAI research funding from Pierre Fabre and Leo Pharma. JPM reports from Pierre Fabre Oncologie, MSD, and Bayer. FD reports compensations for scientific expertise from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Incyte, Merck, MSD, BMS, Servier, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Viatris. JD reports from Sanofi. PH received fee from SANOFI for the study. MF was invited to ASCO GI the year 2016 by Sanofi (which paid plane, hôtel and the congress). VH reports conflicts from AdAcAp, Merck, Amgen, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Ipsen, Sanofi, Esteve, Advanz, Deciphera. CGR is an employee of Sanofi. RA received honoria from Merk and Sanofi. FB, SK, TN, DM, MB, YR, HP, DS, HC, FX CB, MD, AA, SE, ML, SE and RM have no conflicts to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background and Aims: The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) has radically changed the treatment strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but raises questions. Our objectives were to determine survival outcomes and safety in a real-life multicenter French cohort, to investigate the on-treatment prognostic value of the bioinflammatory RECA score, and to perform a matched comparison with patients who previously received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)., Methodology: A retrospective analysis of 109 consecutive patients enrolled from September 2020 to January 2023 and a post matched comparison with a TKI cohort ( n  = 79) by the propensity score matching method., Results: The Atz/Bev population was mainly nonviral disease patients (69%) with Child-Pugh grade A (90%), performance status 0/1 (90%), and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (38%) or stage C (62%) classification. After a median follow-up of 6.5 months (3.6-11.7), overall survival (OS) was 13.0 (5.1-28.7) months. OS was independently associated with metastasis, increased alkaline phosphatase, and serum bilirubin levels. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 78% of patients, mostly grade 1 or 2. The RECA score clearly revealed two different prognosis groups after three cycles. No difference in OS was observed after matching between sequential treatment with TKIs and Atz/Bev., Conclusion: This real-life study highlights the importance of liver function when using Atz/Bev combination and the necessity of identifying predictive markers of response to HCC therapies. Our findings suggest a change in practices, with a marked proportion of intermediate stages, and support the on-treatment prognostic value of an inflammatory score., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved in third-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (aGA/GEJA). The association of oxaliplatin with FTD/TPI is promising and the combination of FTD/TPI + oxaliplatin + nivolumab has shown a predictable and manageable safety profile., Aims: The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab in patients, with HER2 negative aGA/GEJA, unfit for triplet chemotherapy (TFOX/mFLOT regimen), in the first-line metastatic setting in comparison with the standard of care FOLFOX with or without nivolumab., Methods: This study is a prospective randomised, open label, comparative, multicentre, phase II trial designed to include 118 patients. The primary objective is to evaluate the superiority of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab over FOLFOX regimen with or without nivolumab in terms of PFS in a population of patients non candidate for triplet chemotherapy. Nivolumab will be used for patients whose tumour express PD-L1 with a CPS score ≥5., Discussion: PRODIGE73-UCGI40-LOGICAN study will provide efficacy and safety data on the association of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab versus FOLFOX regimen with or without nivolumab in first-line palliative setting, in patients with aGA/GEJA (NCT05476796)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest D.B. reports personal fees as a speaker and/or in an advisory role from Accord Healthcare, Amgen, Sanofi, Servier, and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. O.B. reports personal fees as a speaker and/or in an advisory role from Merck, Bayer, Apmonia Therapeutics, Deciphera, Takeda, MSD, Amgen, Servier, and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. C.C. reports personal fees as speaker and/or in an advisory role from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Pierre Fabre, Daiichy Sankyo, BMS, MSD, Merck Serono, Servier, outside the submitted work. O.D. reports personal fees as speaker and/or in an advisory role from Astra-Zeneca, BMS, MSD, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Servier outside the submitted work. DT: Honoraria: Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Takeda, BeiGene, Astra Zeneca. Consulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, MSD, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Takeda. Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Servier (Inst), Roche (Inst), MSD (Inst), BTG (Inst). Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pierre Fabre. CDLF: Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca,Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Servier, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda. Consulting or Advisory Role: MSD, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Takeda. Research Funding: Servier (Inst), Roche (Inst), MSD (Inst). Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Amgen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Servier., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: GEMPAX was an open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who previously received 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan., Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed mPDAC were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive GEMPAX (paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 + gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 ; IV; once at day (D) 1, D8, and D15/arm A) or gemcitabine (arm B) alone once at D1, D8, and D15 every 28 days until progression, toxicity, or patient's decision. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life, and safety., Results: Overall, 211 patients (median age, 64 [30-86] years; 62% male) were included. After a median study follow-up for alive patients of 13.4 versus 13.8 months in arm A versus arm B, the median OS (95% CI) was 6.4 (5.2 to 7.4) versus 5.9 months (4.6 to 6.9; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [0.63 to 1.20]; P = 0.4095), the median PFS was 3.1 (2.2 to 4.3) versus 2.0 months (1.9 to 2.3; HR, 0.64 [0.47 to 0.89]; P = 0.0067), and the ORR was 17.1% (11.3 to 24.4) versus 4.2% (0.9 to 11.9; P = 0.008) in arm A versus arm B, respectively. Overall, 16.7% of patients in arm A and 2.9% in arm B discontinued their treatment because of adverse events (AEs). One grade 5 AE associated with both gemcitabine and paclitaxel was reported in arm A (acute respiratory distress), and 58.0% versus 27.1% of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs in arm A versus arm B, among which 15.2% versus 4.3% had anemia, 15.9% versus 15.7% had neutropenia, 19.6% versus 4.3% had thrombocytopenia, 10.1% versus 2.9% had asthenia and 12.3% versus 0.0% had neuropathy., Conclusion: While GEMPAX did not meet the primary end point of OS versus gemcitabine alone in patients with mPDAC in the second-line setting, both PFS and ORR were significantly improved.

Background and Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) have common features and differences. This real-life study investigated their characteristics, treatment modalities, and prognoses., Methods: This retrospective comparative study was performed in 1,075 patients seen at one tertiary center between January 2008 and December 2020. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Subclassification of iCCAs after histological and radiological review, and molecular profiling was performed., Results: HCCs patients were more likely to have early-stage disease than iCCA patients. iCCA patients were more likely to be female, especially those patients without cirrhosis (43% vs. 17%). Cirrhosis was prominent among HCC patients (89% vs. 34%), but no difference in underlying liver disease among cirrhotic patients was found. OS of HCC patients was 18.4 (95% CI: 6.4, 48.3) months, that of iCCA patients was 7.0 (95% CI: 3.4, 20.1) months. OS of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C HCC patients was 7.8 (95% CI: 4.3, 14.2) months, that of advanced/metastatic iCCA patients was 8.5 (95% CI: 5.7, 12.3) months. In patients treated with sorafenib, OS was longer in HCC patients who received subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. No significant OS difference was found between iCCA patients with and without cirrhosis or according to histological subtype. A targetable molecular alteration was detected in 50% of the iCCA patients., Conclusions: In this French series, cirrhosis was common in iCCA, which showed etiological factors comparable to those of HCC, implying a distinct oncogenic pathway. Both entities had a dismal prognosis at advanced stages. However, systemic therapies sequencing in HCC and molecular profiling in iCCA offer new insights., Competing Interests: XA: Board member, Consultancy (Bayer, Ipsen, Eisai, Servier); PC: Consultancy (Gilead, Abbvie); MB: Board member, Consultancy (Merck-Schering Plow, Gilead, Janssen, Vertex, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Roche, Abbvie, GSK); HP: Consultancy (Sanofi); RA: Board member, Consultancy (Gilead, Bayer, Eisai, Intercept, Abbvie, MSD, Ipsen); OP: Abbvie, Gilead; AL: Boston Scientific. GP, JB, TW, PB, OM, FN, OL, JPB and XH have no conflict of interests related to this publication., (© 2023 Authors.)

Importance: Only 1 randomized clinical trial has shown the superiority of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with deficient mismatch repair and/or microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the first-line setting., Objectives: To determine whether avelumab (an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody) improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard second-line chemotherapy in patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC., Design, Setting, and Participants: The SAMCO-PRODIGE 54 trial is a national open-label phase 2 randomized clinical trial that was conducted from April 24, 2018, to April 29, 2021, at 49 French sites. Patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC who experienced progression while receiving standard first-line therapy were included in the analysis., Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive standard second-line therapy or avelumab every 2 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or patient refusal., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was PFS according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours), version 1.1, evaluated by investigators in patients with mCRC and confirmed dMMR and MSI status who received at least 1 dose of treatment (modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population)., Results: A total of 122 patients were enrolled in the mITT population. Median age was 66 (IQR, 56-76) years, 65 patients (53.3%) were women, 100 (82.0%) had a right-sided tumor, and 52 (42.6%) had BRAF V600E-mutated tumors. There was no difference in patients and tumor characteristics between treatment groups. No new safety concerns in either group were detected, with fewer treatment-related adverse events of at least grade 3 in the avelumab group than in the chemotherapy group (20 [31.7%] vs 34 [53.1%]; P = .02). After a median follow-up of 33.3 (95% CI, 28.3-34.8) months, avelumab was superior to chemotherapy with or without targeted agents with respect to PFS (15 [24.6%] vs 5 [8.2%] among patients without progression; P = .03). Rates of PFS rates at 12 months were 31.2% (95% CI, 20.1%-42.9%) and 19.4% (95% CI, 10.6%-30.2%) in the avelumab and control groups, respectively, and 27.4% (95% CI, 16.8%-39.0%) and 9.1% (95% CI, 3.2%-18.8%) at 18 months. Objective response rates were similar in both groups (18 [29.5%] vs 16 [26.2%]; P = .45). Among patients with disease control, 18 (75.7%) in the avelumab group compared with 9 (19.1%) in the control group had ongoing disease control at 18 months., Conclusions: The SAMCO-PRODIGE 54 phase 2 randomized clinical trial showed, in patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC, better PFS and disease control duration with avelumab over standard second-line treatment, with a favorable safety profile., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03186326.

Purpose: While perioperative chemotherapy provides a survival benefit over surgery alone in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinomas, the results need to be improved. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative cetuximab combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin., Patients and Methods: Patients received six cycles of cetuximab, cisplatin, and simplified LV5FU2 before and after surgery. The primary objective was a combined evaluation of the tumor objective response (TOR), assessed by computed tomography, and the absence of major toxicities resulting in discontinuation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (45% and 90%, respectively)., Results: From 2011 to 2013, 65 patients were enrolled. From 64 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, 19 (29.7%) had a morphological TOR and 61 (95.3%) did not stop NCT prematurely due to major toxicity. Sixty patients (92.3%) underwent resection. Sixteen patients (/56 available, 28.5%) had histological responses (Mandard tumor regression grade ≤3). After a median follow-up of 44.5 months, median disease-free and overall survival were 24.4 [95% CI: 16.4-39.4] and 40.3 months [95% CI: 27.5-NA], respectively., Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to the NCT regimen in operable G/GEJ adenocarcinomas is safe, but did not show enough efficacy in the present study to meet the primary endpoint (NCT01360086).

Background: Starting a second-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common situation. The only therapeutic options in France are two broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), regorafenib (REG) and cabozantinib (CBZ), but no comparative real-life studies are available., Aim: To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with REG or CBZ, we investigated the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety of both drugs. To identify the variables associated with disease progression over time., Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was performed on the clinical data of patients attending one of three referral centers (Avignon, Marseille, and Nice) between January 2017 and March 2021 using propensity score matching. PFS and OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis (MA) of progression risk factors over time was performed in matched-pair groups., Results: Fifty-eight patients 68 (62-74) years old with HCC, Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) B/C (86%), Child-Pugh (CP)-A/B (24%) received REG for 3.4 (1.4-10.5) mo as second-line therapy. Twenty-eight patients 68 (60-73) years, BCLC B/C (75%), CP-A/B (25%) received CBZ for 3.7 (1.8-4.9) mo after first-line treatment with sorafenib [3 (2-4) (CBZ) vs 4 (2.9-11.8) mo (REG), P = 0.0226]. Twenty percent of patients received third-line therapy. After matching, PFS and DCR were not significantly different after a median follow-up of 6.2 (2.7-11.7) mo (REG) vs 5.2 (4-7.2) mo (CBZ), P = 0.6925. There was no difference in grade 3/4 toxicities, dose reductions, or interruptions. The OS of CP-A patients was 8.3 (5.2-24.8) vs 4.9 (1.6-11.7) mo (CP-B), P = 0.0468. The MA of risk factors for progression over time identified C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/L, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 45 IU as predictive factors., Conclusion: This multicenter indirect comparative study found no significant difference in PFS between REG and CBZ as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. Elevated levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and NLR) and AST were associated with non-control of TKIs over time. A 2-mo online progression risk calculation is proposed., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Xavier Adhoute: Board member, Consultancy (Bayer, Ipsen, Eisai, Servier); Laurent Mineur: Board member, Consultancy (Ipsen, Amgen, Travel, Mundipharma, Eisai); Clemence Toullec: Board member, Consultancy (Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Merck-Serono, MSD, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi, Servier); Albert Tran: Board member, Consultancy (Gilead, Bayer, Eisai, Intercept, Abbvie, MSD, Ipsen); Valérie Oules: Consultancy (Gilead, Abbvie); Paul Castellani: Consultancy (Gilead, Abbvie); Marc Bourlière: Board member, Consultancy (Merck-Schering Plow, Gilead, Janssen, Vertex, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Roche, Abbvie, GSK); Si Nafa Si Ahmed: Consultancy (Gilead); Hervé Perrier: Consultancy (Sanofi); Rodolphe Anty: Board member, Consultancy (Gilead, Bayer, Eisai, Intercept, Abbvie, MSD, Ipsen); Guillaume Pénaranda, Armelle Rollet, Dann Ouizeman and Marie De Matharel have no conflicts of interest., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Whether triplet chemotherapy is superior to doublet chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is unknown., Methods: In this open-label, randomized phase II-III study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional fluorouracil (mFOLFIRINOX), or cisplatin and gemcitabine (CISGEM) for a maximum of 6 months. We report the results of the phase II part, where the primary end point was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate among the patients who received at least one dose of treatment (modified intention-to-treat population) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (statistical assumptions: 6-month PFS rate ≥ 59%, 73% expected)., Results: A total of 191 patients (modified intention-to-treat population, 185: mFOLFIRINOX, 92; CISGEM, 93) were randomly assigned in 43 French centers. After a median follow-up of 21 months, the 6-month PFS rate was 44.6% (90% CI, 35.7 to 53.7) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 47.3% (90% CI, 38.4 to 56.3) in the CISGEM arm. Median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.7) in the CISGEM arm. Median overall survival was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 14.2) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.9 to 16.1) in the CISGEM arm. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 72.8% of patients in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 72.0% of patients in the CISGEM arm (toxic deaths: mFOLFIRINOX arm, two; CISGEM arm, one)., Conclusion: mFOLFIRINOX triplet chemotherapy did not meet the primary study end point. CISGEM doublet chemotherapy remains the first-line standard in advanced BTC., Competing Interests: Jean marc PhelipHonoraria: Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, Amgen, Lilly, Servier, BayerConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, Servier, Bayer, SanofiResearch Funding: Roche, Merck SeronoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Merck Serono, Bayer, Servier, Sanofi Jérôme DesrameExpert Testimony: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Hospira Julien EdelineConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, MSD, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Roche, Basilea, AstraZeneca, Merck SeronoResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, BeigeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche Eric TerrebonneConsulting or Advisory Role: Ipsen, Servier Pierre MichelHonoraria: Bayer, Servier Laetitia DahanHonoraria: Amgen, BMS, Servier, Oseus, Mylan Vincent BourgeoisConsulting or Advisory Role: ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Servier, Sanofi Faiza Khemissa AkouzLeadership: Bayer, SanofiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanofi, Ipsen, Servier, Roche Emilie SoularueConsulting or Advisory Role: ServierSpeakers' Bureau: BMSTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Servier Yann MolinConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen Oncology Thierry LecomteConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Merck Serono, Servier, Amgen, Sanofi, Amgen, Ipsen, Pierre FabreTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ipsen, Servier/Pfizer François GhiringhelliHonoraria: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Roche/Genentech Romain CoriatConsulting or Advisory Role: BayerSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis/Ipsen, Bayer, AmgenResearch Funding: IpsenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pierre Fabre, Amgen Cindy NeuzilletHonoraria: Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Merck¸ MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Incyte, Mylan, Baxter, Fresenius Kabi, NutriciaResearch Funding: Roche, AstraZeneca, OSE ImmunotherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Oncology, Merck, Amgen, Mylan David MalkaHonoraria: Roche, Bayer, Servier, Sanofi, HalioDx, Pierre Fabre, Viatris, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, LEO PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Sanofi, Merck Serono, MSD, Servier, Bayer, Incyte, Amgen, HalioDx, Agios, Bristol Myers SquibTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, Merck Serono, Servier, AmgenNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The fast spread of COVID-19 is related to the highly infectious nature of SARS-CoV-2. The disease is suggested to be transmitted through saliva droplets and nasal discharge. The saliva quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in real-time PCR from asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 adults has not been fully documented. This study analyzed the relationship between salivary viral load on demographics and clinical characteristics including symptoms, co-morbidities in 160 adults diagnosed as COVID-19 positive patients recruited between September and December 2020 in four French centers. Median initial viral load was 4.12 log 10 copies/mL (IQR 2.95-5.16; range 0-10.19 log 10 copies/mL). 68.6% of adults had no viral load detected. A median load reduction of 23% was observed between 0-2 days and 3-5 days, and of 11% between 3-5 days and 6-9 days for the delay from onset of symptoms to saliva sampling. No significant median difference between no-symptoms vs. symptoms patients was observed. Charge was consistently similar for the majority of the clinical symptoms excepted for headache with a median load value of 3.78 log 10 copies/mL [1.95-4.58] ( P < 0.003). SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral load was associated with headache and gastro-intestinal symptoms. The study found no statistically significant difference in viral loads between age groups, sex, or presence de co-morbidity. Our data suggest that oral cavity is an important site for SARS-CoV-2 infection and implicate saliva as a potential route of SARS-CoV-2 transmission., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Carrouel, Gadea, Esparcieux, Dimet, Langlois, Perrier, Dussart and Bourgeois.)

Objectives: To determine if commercially available mouthwash with β-cyclodextrin and citrox (bioflavonoids) (CDCM) could decrease the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) salivary viral load., Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR-positive patients aged 18-85 years with asymptomatic to mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms for <8 days were recruited. A total of 176 eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to CDCM or placebo. Three rinses daily were performed for 7 days. Saliva sampling was performed on day 1 at 09.00 (T1), 13.00 (T2) and 18.00 (T3). On the following 6 days, one sample was taken at 15.00. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect SARS-CoV-2., Results: The intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that, over the course of 1 day, CDCM was significantly more effective than placebo 4 hours after the first dose (p 0.036), with a median percentage (log 10 copies/mL) decrease T1-T2 of -12.58% (IQR -29.55% to -0.16%). The second dose maintained the low median value for the CDCM (3.08 log 10 copies/mL; IQR 0-4.19), compared with placebo (3.31 log 10  copies/mL; IQR 1.18-4.75). At day 7, there was still a greater median percentage (log 10 copies/mL) decrease in salivary viral load over time in the CDCM group (-58.62%; IQR -100% to -34.36%) compared with the placebo group (-50.62%; IQR -100% to -27.66%). These results were confirmed by the per-protocol analysis., Conclusions: This trial supports the relevance of using CDCM on day 1 (4 hours after the initial dose) to reduce the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva. For long-term effect (7 days), CDMC appears to provide a modest benefit compared with placebo in reducing viral load in saliva., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Careful selection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients prior to chemoembolization treatment is a daily reality, and is even more necessary with new available therapeutic options in HCC., Aim: To propose two new models to better stratify patients and maximize clinical benefit: "6 and 12" and "pre/post-TACE-predict" (TACE, transarterial chemoembolization)., Methods: We evaluated and compared their performance in predicting overall survival with other systems {Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) and NIACE [Number of tumor(s), Infiltrative HCC, alpha-fetoprotein, Child-Pugh (CP), and performance status]} in two HCC French cohorts of different stages enrolled between 2010 and 2018., Results: The cohorts included 324 patients classified as BCLC stages A/B (cohort 1) and 137 patients classified as BCLC stages B/C (cohort 2). The majority of the patients had cirrhosis with preserved liver function. "Pre-TACE-predict" and "6 and 12" models identified three distinct categories of patients exhibiting different prognosis in cohort 1. However, their prognostic value was no better than the BCLC system or NIACE score. Liver function based on CP and ALBI grades significantly impacted patient survival. Conversely, the "post-TACE-predict" model had a higher predictive value than other models. The stratification ability as well as predictive performance of these new models in an intermediate/advanced stage population was less efficient (cohort 2)., Conclusion: The newly proposed "Pre-TACE-predict" and "6 and 12" models offer an interesting stratification into three categories in a recommended TACE population, as they identify poor candidates, those with partial control and durable response. The models' contribution was reduced in a population with advanced stage HCCs., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no potential conflict of interest relative to this article. Adhoute X: Board member (Bayer, Ipsen, Eisai); Grant from Ipsen, Eisai. Anty R: Board member (Gilead, Bayer, Eisai, Intercept, Abbvie, MSD, Ipsen). Chevallier P: Board member (Bayer). Tran A: Board member (Gilead, Bayer, Eisai, Intercept, Abbvie, MSD, Ipsen). Bronowicki JP: Board member (Merck-Schering Plough, Janssen, Roche, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead, Novartis, GSK, Bayer). Raoul JL: Board member (Bayer, BMS, Daichi). Castellani P: Board member (Gilead). Bourlière M: Board member (Merck-Schering Plough, Gilead, Janssen, Vertex, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Roche, Abbvie, GSK). Pénaranda G, Perrier H, Monnet O, Bayle O and Pol B have no conflict of interest., (©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to determine whether self-collected pure saliva (SCPS) is comparable to nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in the quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in asymptomatic, mild patients with confirmed COVID-19. Thirty-one patients aged from 18 to 85 years were included between 9 June and 11 December 2020. A SCPS sample and a NP sample were taken for each patient. Quantitative PCR was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Results of SCPS vs. NP samples testing were compared. Statistical analyses were performed. Viral load was significantly correlated ( r = 0.72). The concordance probability was estimated at 73.3%. In symptomatic adults, SCPS performance was similar to that of NP swabs (Percent Agreement = 74.1%; p = 0.11). Thus, the salivary test based on pure oral saliva samples easily obtained by noninvasive techniques has a fair agreement with the nasopharyngeal one in asymptomatic, mild patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.

Background: Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one first-line option therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not suitable for surgical resection., Aims: We evaluated the effects of sunitinib plus doxorubicin-TACE on bleeding or liver failure., Methods: Seventy-eight patients with HCC were included in this randomized, double-blind study. They received one to three TACE plus either sunitinib or placebo four weeks out of six for one year. The occurrence of severe bleeding or liver failure was assessed during the week after the TACE. The safety and survival outcomes were evaluated., Results: No bleeding complication was reported. One and two liver failures were respectively observed in sunitinib and placebo patients. Compliance to sunitinib treatment was acceptable. Sunitinib dose reduction occurred in 37% of patients due to acute toxicity. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were: thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, increased bilirubin, increased ALT and asthenia. In the sunitinib group, the median PFS and OS were 9.05 [5.81;11.63] and 25.0 [13.5;36.8] months, respectively. In the placebo group, the median PFS and OS were 5.51 [4.14;7.79] and 20.5 [15.1;30.6] months, respectively., Conclusions: TACE plus sunitinib in the first-line therapy for patients with HCC not suitable for surgical resection was feasible. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT01164202., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have failed in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients except those with dMMR/MSI tumors. However, until very recently we had only non-comparative promising data in this population with anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1) antibodies alone or combined with anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) antibodies. This comparative phase II trial (NCT03186326), conducted in more than 100 centers in France, will include dMMR/MSI mCRC patients with progression after a first-line treatment with chemotherapy ± targeted therapies, to evaluate efficacy and safety of the anti-PDL1 Avelumab versus a standard second-line treatment. Main inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 to 75 years, ECOG performance status ≤2, dMMR/MSI mCRC and failure of a standard first-line regimen. Patient will be randomised to receive Avelumab 10 mg/kg versus standard second-line doublet chemotherapy plus a targeted agent according to tumor RAS status. Patients will be followed for 4 years. A gain of 5 months in median PFS is expected in favour of the Avelumab arm (12 vs 7 months; HR=0.58). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. In addition, circulating tumour DNA and microbiota will be explored to test their potential prognostic and predictive values. The study was opened in March 2018., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JT has received honoraria for speaker or advisory role from Sanofi, Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Astra Zeneca and MSD. LE has received honoraria for speaker or advisory role Servier, Merck Serono, Amgen. PLP is a consultant/advisory board member for Merck Serono, Astrazeneca Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biocartis, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Servierand MSD. CL has served in a consulting/advisory role and or received honoraria for, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, AAA. FE has received honoraria for speaker and/or advisory role from Ipsen, Merck, Bayer, Sanofi and Servier. OB has received honoraria for speaker and/or advisory role from Merck KGaA, Roche Genentech, Bayer, Astra-Zeneca, Grunenthal, MSD, Amgen, Servier, and Pierre Fabre, TA has served in a consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Clovis, Halliodx, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Ventana, Sanofi, Servier and has received travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche/Ventana, MSD Oncology, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. DT has served in a consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Roche/Ventana, Sanofi, Servier, Novartis, Merck Serono and Astra Zeneca. HP has served in a consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi, Servier, Merck Serono and Roche. SK has received honoraria for speaker and/or advisory role from Amgen, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Servier. EB, JFE, JB, MC and FD have nothing to disclose. CT has received honoraria for speaker or advisory role from Merck, Sanofi, MSD, Ipsen, Amgen, Servier, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. This research was financially supported by Merck Santé S.A.S., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, as part of an alliance between Merck KGaA and Pfizer., (Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In some situations, there is a need for rapid mutation tests for guiding clinical decisions and starting targeted therapies with minimal delays. In this study we evaluated the turnaround time before and after the implementation of a fully automated multiplex assay for KRAS and NRAS/BRAF mutation tests (Idylla™ platform, Biocartis) in metastatic colorectal cancer. The objective of this project was to compare the turnaround times in 2017-2018 with the fully automated multiplex assay to the 2016 results with previous methods. Centers with a number of tests for metastatic colorectal cancer > 100 yearly and a usual turnaround time ≥ 3 weeks for mutation detection were selected. Results of 505 KRAS tests and 369 NRAS/BRAF tests were transmitted by 10 centers. The mean turnaround time from test prescription to reception of results was reduced from 25.8 days in 2016 to 4.5 days in 2017-2018. In conclusion, this pilot project shows that the Idylla™ platform for testing KRAS and NRAS/BRAF mutations allows an optimized turnaround time from test prescription to reception of results.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumour. We conducted a prospective cohort to describe the prevalence, survival and prognostic factors in unselected SBA patients. The study enrolled patients with all stages of newly diagnosed or recurrent SBA at 74 French centres between January 2009 and December 2012. In total, 347 patients were analysed; the median age was 63 years (range 23-90). The primary tumour was in the duodenum (60.6%), jejunum (20.7%) and ileum (18.7%). The prevalence of predisposing disease was 8.7%, 6.9%, 1.7%, 1.7% and 0.6% for Crohn disease, Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, celiac disease and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, respectively. At diagnosis, 58.9%, 5.5% and 35.6% of patients had localised and resectable, locally advanced unresectable and metastatic disease, respectively. Crohn disease was significantly associated with younger age, poor differentiation and ileum location, whereas Lynch syndrome with younger age, poor differentiation, early stage and duodenum location. Adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin-based in 89.9%) was performed in 61.5% of patients with locally resected tumours. With a 54-months median follow-up, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 87.9%, 78.2% and 55.5% in Stages I, II and III, respectively. The median OS of patients with Stage IV was 12.7 months. In patients with resected tumours, poor differentiation (p = 0.047) and T4 stage (p = 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of death. In conclusion, our study showed that the prognosis of advanced SBA remains poor. Tumour characteristics differed according to predisposing disease. In SBA-resected tumours, the prognostic factors for OS were grade and T stage., (© 2020 UICC.)

Objective: Diagnostic tests, such as Immunoscore, predict prognosis in patients with colon cancer. However, additional prognostic markers could be detected on pathological slides using artificial intelligence tools., Design: We have developed a software to detect colon tumour, healthy mucosa, stroma and immune cells on CD3 and CD8 stained slides. The lymphocyte density and surface area were quantified automatically in the tumour core (TC) and invasive margin (IM). Using a LASSO algorithm, DGMate (DiGital tuMor pArameTErs), we detected digital parameters within the tumour cells related to patient outcomes., Results: Within the dataset of 1018 patients, we observed that a poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) was associated with high IM stromal area (HR 5.65; 95% CI 2.34 to 13.67; p<0.0001) and high DGMate (HR 2.72; 95% CI 1.92 to 3.85; p<0.001). Higher CD3+ TC, CD3+ IM and CD8+ TC densities were significantly associated with a longer RFS. Analysis of variance showed that CD3+ TC yielded a similar prognostic value to the classical CD3/CD8 Immunoscore (p=0.44). A combination of the IM stromal area, DGMate and CD3, designated 'DGMuneS', outperformed Immunoscore when used in estimating patients' prognosis (C-index=0.601 vs 0.578, p=0.04) and was independently associated with patient outcomes following Cox multivariate analysis. A predictive nomogram based on DGMuneS and clinical variables identified a group of patients with less than 10% relapse risk and another group with a 50% relapse risk., Conclusion: These findings suggest that artificial intelligence can potentially improve patient care by assisting pathologists in better defining stage III colon cancer patients' prognosis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JPL served on external advisory board or Sanofi Avantis France; received fee for travel from Ipsen, Novartis, Amgen, Roche; received fee for communication from Novartis and funding for research was provided by Merck Serono, Roche and MSD. DL received fee for travel from Merck Serono and Amgen. CL receives speakers bureau honoraria from Amgen, Novartis and Bayer and is a consultant/advisory board member for Novartis and Halio-DX. P-LP is a consultant/advisory board member for Merck Serono, Amgen, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Biocartis, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb and MSD. JT has received honoraria for speaker or advisory role from Sanofi, Roche, Merck, Amgen, Sirtex, Servier, Lilly, Celgene and MSD. FG served on external advisory boards for Roche. Research funding received from Roche, Genentech, Amgen, Enterome and Servier. Received funding for clinical trial from Astra Zeneca; received fee for communication from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Sanofi, Merck-Serono and Servier and received fee for travel from Roche and Servier., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with lipiodol is widely performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) unsuitable for curative treatment. Additional tumor parameters such as HCC macroscopic appearance based on imaging might be helpful for transarterial chemoembolization prognostication and management., Patients and Methods: A total of 405 patients with HCC who underwent cTACE between 2008 and 2016 from a real-life multicenter French cohort were retrospectively reviewed. Tumors were classified into two macroscopic types according to HCC gross appearance on imaging: nodular versus non-nodular. The study population was stratified into two groups: derivation and validation cohorts. Independent prognostic factors of survival based on multivariate cox regression models were determined and then assessed in the validation set. Thereafter, time to progression (TTP) and radiological response rate were investigated for each prognostic factors of survival., Results: Median overall survival (OS) was 35 months for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A, 22 months for BCLC stage B and 12 months for BCLC stage C patients (P < 0.0001). The corresponding TTP for these patients was 12 (7-17) months, 5 (3-6) months and 1.2 (1.2-3) months (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumors size and number, non-nodular type, alpha-fetoprotein, aspartate aminotransferase serum levels and impairment of performance status-1 were independent predictors of survival among the study groups. Non-nodular type was the most powerful factor that influences OS, TTP and radiological response rate for the recommended transarterial chemoembolization candidates. TTP was consistent with OS within each stage., Conclusion: HCC macroscopic appearance on imaging is a determinant predictor of outcome after cTACE in a real-life multicenter cohort.

Background: Sorafenib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The management of its side effects is improving. This study aimed to assess, in real life, if this translates into a better prognosis., Methods: This was a retrospective study of advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib between 2007 and 2017., Results: 188 advanced HCC patients received > 4 weeks of sorafenib. Median treatment duration was 5.4 months and median overall survival (mOS) 10 months (95% confidence interval 15-27). Sorafenib was initiated in 65 patients in 2007-2012 and 123 in 2013-2017. Both groups were comparable except for Barcelona Clinic liver cancer class. Tumor progression, disease control (DC) rate, and incidence of toxicity were similar in the 2 periods, but the duration of treatment (4.3 vs. 5.9 months; p < 0.01) and mOS (8 vs. 12 months; p < 0.002) differed. Among progressive disease patients, mOS was similar (7 months) but for those who had DC at 8 weeks, mOS was longer in the recent period (13 vs. 27 months; p < 0.0001). In the univariate analysis of OS, the period of treatment had a prognostic value., Conclusion: When comparing 2 periods of treatment in advanced HCC patients under sorafenib, duration of treatment and mOS were higher in the recent period. While mOS did not differ for patients who progressed, it was 2-fold higher in the recent period for those who had tumor control. Improvements in the use of sorafenib seem to be associated with better outcomes limited to patients with DC., Competing Interests: JLR is a Board member of Bayer, BMS, BTG, Terumo, and Astra-Zeneca. XA is a Board member of Bayer. GP grant from Bayer; MB is a Board member of Merck-Schering Plough, Janssen, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, and Bayer., (Copyright © 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) pathways, which promote tumour growth and proliferation, are often deregulated in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. We assessed whether adding panitumumab (an EGFR inhibitor) or rilotumumab (a HGF inhibitor) to first-line fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy (modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil [mFOLFOX6]) benefits to patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma., Patients and Methods: This phase II, open-label, randomised, three-arm study enrolled patients ≥18 years, with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 and no known HER2 overexpression. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 , 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m 2 bolus then 2400 mg/m 2 over 46 h) alone or combined with panitumumab (6 mg/kg) or rilotumumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks until limiting toxicity, patient's refusal or disease progression. The primary end-point was the 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS) and tolerance., Results: The study enrolled 162 patients in 29 French centres. The median follow-up was 23.6 months (interquartile range = 16.4-29.0). The 4-month PFS rate was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 57-82) with chemotherapy alone, 57% (95% CI = 42-71) combined with panitumumab and 61% (95% CI = 47-74) combined with rilotumumab. Median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI = 8.7-16.9) with chemotherapy alone, 8.3 months (95% CI = 6.2-13.2) combined with panitumumab and 11.5 months (95% CI = 7.9-17.1) combined with rilotumumab. Adverse events grade ≥III occurred less frequently with chemotherapy alone (62%) than with panitumumab (83%) and rilotumumab (89%)., Conclusions: We found no benefit in adding panitumumab or rilotumumab to mFOLFOX6 first-line chemotherapy to treat advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients., Trial Registration: European Clinical Trials Database, number 2009-012797-12., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognostic scores could be useful in addition to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system to clarify patient prognosis and guide treatment decision. The NIACE (tumor Nodularity, Infiltrative nature of the tumor, serum Alpha-fetoprotein level, Child-Pugh stage, ECOG performance status) score distinguishes different prognosis groups among BCLC A, B, and C HCC patients. Our aims are to evaluate the NIACE score and its additive value in two HCC cohorts treated either by surgery or by chemoembolization, and then according to the BCLC recommendations., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study with two BCLC A, B, and C HCC cohorts treated either by surgery (n=207) or by chemoembolization (n=168) carried out between 2008 and 2013. We studied survival time according to the baseline NIACE score and compared it with the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score and the BCLC system., Results: The NIACE score differentiates between subgroups of patients with different prognosis within each BCLC class. Among BCLC A patients treated by surgery and BCLC B patients treated by chemoembolization, the NIACE score differentiates between two subgroups with a significant difference in survival time: 68 (55-81) months versus 35 (21-56) months (P=0.0004) and 20 (17-24) months versus 13 (7-17) months (P=0.0008), respectively. Among those subgroups, the NIACE score has a significantly better prognostic value than the BCLC system or the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score., Conclusion: In this study, among HCC patients treated according to the BCLC recommendations, the NIACE score predicts more accurately than any other system the survival time.

Aim: To compare the performances of the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) nomogram and others systems (BCLC, HKLC, CLIP, NIACE) for survival prediction in a large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) French cohort., Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 01/2007 to 12/2013 in five French centers. Newly diagnosed HCC patients were analyzed. The discriminatory ability, homogeneity ability, prognostic stratification ability Akaike information criterion (AIC) and C-index were compared among scoring systems., Results: The cohort included 1102 patients, mostly men, median age 68 [60-74] years with cirrhosis (81%), child-Pugh A (73%), alcohol-related (41%), HCV-related (27%). HCC were multinodular (59%) and vascular invasion was present in 41% of cases. At time of HCC diagnosis BCLC stages were A (17%), B (16%), C (60%) and D (7%). First line HCC treatment was curative in 23.5%, palliative in 59.5%, BSC in 17% of our population. Median OS was 10.8 mo [4.9-28.0]. Each system distinguished different survival prognosis groups ( P < 0.0001). The nomogram had the highest discriminatory ability, the highest C-index value. NIACE score had the lowest AIC value. The nomogram distinguished sixteen different prognosis groups. By classifying unifocal large HCC into tumor burden 1, the nomogram was less powerful., Conclusion: In this French cohort, the BCLC nomogram and the NIACE score provided the best prognostic information, but the NIACE could even help treatment strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is quite complex owing to the underlying cirrhosis and portal vein hypertension. Different scores or classification systems based on liver function and tumoral stages have been published in the recent years. If none of them is currently "universally" recognized, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system has become the reference classification system in Western countries. Based on a robust treatment algorithm associated with stage stratification, it relies on a high level of evidence. However, BCLC stage B and C HCC include a broad spectrum of tumors but are only matched with a single therapeutic option. Some experts have thus suggested to extend the indications for surgery or for transarterial chemoembolization. In clinical practice, many patients are already treated beyond the scope of recommendations. Additional alternative prognostic scores that could be applied to any therapeutic modality have been recently proposed. They could represent complementary tools to the BCLC staging system and improve the stratification of HCC patients enrolled in clinical trials, as illustrated by the NIACE score. Prospective studies are needed to compare these scores and refine their role in the decision making process.

Background: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes a wide spectrum of tumors and patients' prognosis after treatment is highly variable. Moreover, therapeutic options based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system algorithm are restricted to one systemic therapy., Aim of the Study: To refine the stratification among BCLC C HCC patients by establishing a new simple prognostic score., Patients and Methods: A regression model based on a BCLC stage C population and validated with an external cohort of BCLC C HCC patients defined the score. It was therefore validated among three external cohorts of BCLC C HCC patients treated with sorafenib., Results: Five variables had independent prognostic values: the number of nodules, the infiltrating nature of the HCC, α-fetoprotein serum level, Child-Pugh score, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status grade. They were integrated into a new score named NIACE ranging from 0 to 7, well correlated with survival. With the use of one threshold value, this score enables defining of two populations with different survivals among BCLC C patients and specifically among those treated with sorafenib., Conclusion: The NIACE score defines different prognostic subgroups after palliative treatment of HCC. It could be an additional tool for BCLC C HCC before inclusion in clinical trials or for the management of patients. These results must be validated in a prospective study.

We investigated the efficacy and safety of oral Uracil/tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin and mitomycin C (MMC) as third-line treatment for patients with extensively pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This was a multicenter, prospective phase II study. Patients received MMC 7 mg/m² on day 1 and UFT 300 mg/m² with leucovorin 90 mg, both divided into three daily doses, on days 1-28 every 5 weeks. All patients had failed prior treatment with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, bevacizumab, and cetuximab. The primary endpoint was tumor control rate evaluated after 2 cycles. Twenty-one patients were included: median age was 66 years (41.1-87.8 years). Tumor control rate was observed in 26.7% of the 15 patients evaluable for response. Median overall survival was 6.4 months. Grade 3 adverse events were asthenia, anorexia, and vomiting. In patients with mCRC who have progressed after as many as two prior therapies, the combination of UFT/leucovorin and MMC is safe and may produce a short stabilization of disease in approximately 25% of patients.

Lenalidomide (LEN) has been shown to yield red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence in about 25% of lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) without del(5q), but its efficacy in patients clearly refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) is not known. We report on 31 consecutive lower-risk non-del(5q) MDS patients with anaemia refractory to ESA and treated with LEN in a compassionate programme, 20 of whom also received an ESA. An erythroid response was obtained in 15 patients (48%), including 10 of the 27 (37%) previously transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) patients, who became transfusion-independent (RBC-TI). Nine of the responders relapsed, whereas 6 (40%) were still responding and transfusion-free after 11(+)-31(+) months. Median response duration was 24 months. The erythroid response rate was lower in refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (27% vs. 60%) and tended to be higher in patients treated with LEN + ESA (55% vs. 36%). Response duration was significantly longer in responders who obtained RBC-TI and in patients treated with LEN after primary resistance to ESA. The main toxicity of LEN was cytopenias. We confirm that, in a patient population of lower risk MDS without del 5q clearly resistant to ESA, LEN is an interesting second line therapeutic option. Its combination with ESAs in this context warrants prospective studies., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

One side effect of the immunomodulatory effect of interferon is the possible triggering or exacerbation of systemic or cutaneous sarcoidosis. We report two new cases and offer an exhaustive review of the literature. A 39-year-old man with type C chronic active hepatitis developed new respiratory symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates with hilar and mediastinal adenopathy after 7 months of treatment with pegylated interferon. The evolution was favourable after stopping treatment. The second patient developed cutaneous lesions after 6 months of treatment. Resolution occurred after the discontinuation of the treatment. In these two cases ribavirin was stopped before the first signs of sarcoidosis.