Search

Background: Complications after percutaneous breast biopsy are infrequent but may include hematoma, pseudoaneurysm formation, persistent pain, infection, delayed wound healing, vasovagal reaction, hemothorax, pneumothorax, and neoplastic seeding. The risk factors include tumor factors (size, location, vascularity), procedure-related factors (needle diameter, number of biopsies), and interventionist experience. There has been no previous report of a fatal complication resulting from percutaneous breast biopsy., Case Presentation: We report a 54-year-old Asian woman with a 3 cm BI-RADS ® 4B left breast mass in the lower-inner quadrant who was biopsied by a 16 G needle under ultrasound guidance at a province hospital. She experienced dizziness and near-syncope afterward. The initial evaluation showed evidence of cardiac tamponade with hemodynamic instability. She underwent urgent subxiphoid pericardial window and was transferred to our facility. We brought her directly to the operating room to perform an explorative median sternotomy and found a 0.2 cm hole in the right ventricle. The injured site was successfully repaired without cardiopulmonary bypass. Postoperative echocardiography demonstrated mild right ventricular dysfunction without evidence of septal or valvular injury. She survived with no significant complications., Discussion: This case might be the first report of a life-threatening complication related to percutaneous breast core-needle biopsy. The rapid pericardial release is key to the survival of cardiac tamponade. The patient subsequently required cardiac repair and monitoring to avoid long-term complications. In this report, we suggested a safe biopsy method, complications recognition, and appropriate management of penetrating cardiac injury., Conclusion: Penetrating cardiac injury resulting from percutaneous breast biopsy is extremely rare but can occur. A biopsy must be done cautiously, and worst-case management should promptly be considered., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Cardiac injury caused by a sharp object is a medical and surgical therapeutic challenge. Mortality risk factors have been identified but there are major discrepancies in the literature. The aim of this study was to analyse the management of victims of penetrating cardiac injuries before and after admission to hospital and the anatomical characteristics of these injuries in order to facilitate diagnosis of the most critical patients., Methods: To carry out this study, we conducted a retrospective analytical study with epidemiological data on victims of penetrating cardiac injuries. We included two types of patients, with those who underwent autopsy in our institution after death from sharp injury to the heart or great vessels and those who survived with treatment in the emergency department or intensive care unit between January 2015 and February 2022., Results: We included 30 autopsied patients and 12 survivors aged between 18 and 73 years. Higher mortality was associated with prehospital or in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest (OR = 4, CI [1.71-9.35]), preoperative mechanical ventilation (OR = 10, CI [1.53-65.41]), preoperative catecholamines (OR = 7, CI [1.12-6.29]), preoperative and perioperative adrenaline (OR = 13, CI [1.98-85.46] and [1.98-85.46]), penetrating cardiac injury (OR = 14, CI [2.10-93.22]), multiple cardiac injuries (OR = 1.5, CI [1.05-2.22]) and an Organ Injury Scaling of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST-OIS) score of 5 (OR = 2.9, CI [1.04-8.54]; p = 0.0329) with an AUC-ROC curve value of 0.708 (CI [0.543-0.841])., Conclusions: This study identified risk mortality factors in penetrating cardiac injury patients. These findings can help improve the diagnosis and management of these patients. The AAST-OIS score may be a good tool to diagnose critical patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

A century ago, cardiac injuries usually resulted in death. However, despite all the advances in medicine, these injuries still have high mortality and morbidity rates. In the present case, we describe a patient with a bullet injury to the right ventricle who survived at our hospital despite the limitations of our center with regard to modalities and equipment. A 30-year-old man was brought to our emergency department with a bullet wound to his left flank. He was hemodynamically unstable. After only 8 minutes in the hospital and without further investigations he was rushed to the operating room. During laparotomy, a clot was visible in the left diaphragm, which dislodged and caused extensive bleeding. The decision was made to perform a sternotomy in the absence of a sternal saw. An oblique 8-cm injury to the right ventricle was discovered following rapid exploration. It was repaired without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. After a few days in the hospital, the patient was discharged home. In the event of a penetrating cardiac injury, rapid decision-making is crucial for survival. Whenever possible, the patient should be transferred to the operating room, as emergency department thoracotomies are associated with a high mortality rate., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2023 The Korean Society of Traumatology.)

Introduction and Importance: Penetrating cardiac injury is rare (0.1 % of trauma admissions) but fatal. Presentation is with features of cardiac tamponade or hemorrhagic shock. Urgent clinical evaluation, ultrasound, temporizing pericardiocentesis or surgical repair with cardiopulmonary bypass as back up consist of standard management. In this paper, experience of management of penetrating cardiac injury from a resource limited country is presented., Case Presentations: There were seven patients, five had a stab injury and two had gunshot wound. All were men with mean age of 31.1 years. Patients arrived within 30 min (3), 2 h (2), 4 h (1) and 18 h (1) after injury. Mean initial blood pressure and pulse rates were 83/51 mm Hg and 121, respectively. One patient had pericardiocentesis before referral. Exploration was via left anterolateral thoracotomy. Four (57.1 %) had right ventricle perforation, one had both right and left ventricle, and two (28.5 %) had left ventricle perforation. Suture repair (6) and pericardial patch (1) were done without bypass machine as back up. Mean duration of stay in the intensive care unit and in the surgical wards were 4.4 days (range: 2-15) and 10.8 days (range: 1-48), respectively. All were discharged improved., Clinical Discussion: Penetrating cardiac injury presents with low blood pressure and tachycardia after stab or gunshot wounds. Right ventricle is mostly affected. Pericardiocentesis can be done as temporary measure. While having bypass machine as back up is recommended, the absence of it should not preclude intervention. Suture repair can be done with left anterolateral thoracotomy., Conclusion: Penetrating cardiac injury can be managed in resource limited settings without back up of cardiopulmonary bypass. Early identification and surgical intervention results in favorable outcome., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None declared., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Penetrating cardiac trauma is rare but can cause life-threatening complications. Survival is dependent on prompt diagnosis and treatment. Given the low incidence and life-threatening implications, it is difficult to study in large prospective studies. The current literature regarding penetrating cardiac trauma comes primarily from large, experienced trauma centers and military sources. Understanding the history, current literature and even expert opinion can help with effectively treating injury promptly to maximize survival after penetrating cardiac trauma. We aimed to review the etiology and history of penetrating cardiac trauma. We review the prehospital treatment and initial diagnostic modalities. We review the incisional approaches to treatment including anterolateral thoracotomy, median sternotomy and subxiphoid window. The repair of atrial, ventricular and coronary injuries are also addressed in our review. The purpose of this paper is to perform a narrative review to better describe the history, etiology, presentation, and management of penetrating cardiac trauma., Methods: A narrative review was preformed synthesizing literature from MEDLINE and bibliographic review from identified publications. Studies were included based on relevance without exclusion to time of publication or original publication language., Key Content and Findings: Sonographic identification of pericardial fluid can aid in diagnosis of patients too unstable for CT. Anterolateral thoracotomy should be used for emergent repairs and initial stabilization. A median sternotomy can be used for more stable patients with known injuries. Carefully placed mattress sutures can be useful for repair of injuries surrounding coronary vessels to avoid devascularization., Conclusions: Penetrating cardiac trauma is life threatening and requires prompt workup and treatment. Trauma algorithms should continue to refine and be clear on which patients should undergo an emergency department (ED) thoracotomy, median sternotomy and further imaging., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://med.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/med-22-18/coif). The series “Traumatic Injuries of the Mediastinum” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Mediastinum. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Penetrating chest trauma (PCT) represents 10% of worldwide mortality, with developing countries counting as some of the most affected by high mortality rates due to cardiac trauma. Colombia is considered one of the most violent countries due to the high mortality rate associated with war and crime, hence the validation of an own classification for penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) is mandatory., Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study which included adult patients with PCIs at a level 4 trauma center in Colombia, between January 2018 and April 2020. We used our own system (Bogotá Classification) and compared it with traditional systems (e.g., Ivatury's, OIS-AAST), by analyzing the mechanism of injury (MOI), the hemodynamic status of the patient at admission, the inpatient management, the individual outcomes, and some demographic variables. Bivariate statistical analysis, spearman correlation, and logistic regression were performed., Results: Four hundred and ninety-nine patients were included. Bivariate analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between mortality and hemodynamic state, MOI, its location and degree of lesion, cardiac/vessel injury, cardiac tamponade, time between injury and medical care, fluid reanimation, as well as the Ivatury's classification and the new classification ( p  < 0.005). The adequate correlation between Ivatury's and Bogotá classification supports the latter's clinical utility for patients presenting with PCI. Likewise, logistic regression showed a statistically significant association among mortality rates ( p  < 0.005)., Conclusions: The Bogotá classification showed similar performance to the Ivatury's classification, correlating most strongly with mortality. This scale could be replicated in countries with similar social and economic contexts., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Comparative morbidity after either sternotomy or non-resuscitative thoracotomy in penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) is unknown., Methods: Retrospective review of adults with PCI who underwent either sternotomy or non-resuscitative thoracotomy using the National Trauma Data Bank 2007-2015. Since there is no unique International Classification of Diseases Procedure Coding System (ICD-PCS) codes assigned for resuscitative vs. non-resuscitative thoracotomy, and both procedures were coded as "thoracotomy", propensity score (PS) methods were applied to avoid inclusion of resuscitative thoracotomy., Results: Despite well PS matching on injury severity score the non-thoracotomy group compared to the sternotomy group had a significantly increased risk of mortality (30 percent vs 8 percent, p<0.0001). The morbidity differed as well-25 percent vs. 12 percent, p=0.0007., Conclusions: The differences in mortality in PCI patients who underwent non-resuscitative thoracotomy vs. sternotomy may be biased by unintentional inclusion of resuscitative thoracotomy. To accurately capture thoracotomy type, separate unique resuscitative and non-resuscitative thoracotomy procedure codes should be created in future revisions of the ICD PCS., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Health Information Management Association.)

Aorto-cardiac fistula is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. We herein report a rare case of chronic aorto-right ventricular fistula formation secondary to a stab penetrating injury to the heart and aorta occurred 15 years ago. The aorto-right ventricular fistula was not found until 15 years after the incident. The fistula had been repaired successfully to prevent further deterioration of cardiac function. Here, we report the clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment strategies of the aorto-right ventricular fistula, and discuss the possible etiology of the development of the fistula after the penetrating injury., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Stingrays are found in open waters and are also kept in exhibits in many aquariums throughout the world. They are generally nonaggressive creatures by nature, but they can inflict injuries with their spines if provoked. We present a case of a 62-y-old diver who was pierced in the chest by the barb of a stingray while transferring the animal to another tank as part of his work in a public aquarium. He was rescued immediately from the tank but was found to be in cardiac arrest. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation was promptly initiated by his colleagues. He was rapidly evacuated to the nearest emergency department, where he was noted to be in pulseless electrical activity. A single puncture wound was noted over the right second intercostal space, with the spine of the stingray still impaled in the chest. Trauma surgeons were activated promptly, and resuscitation was continued based on advanced cardiac and trauma life support guidelines, which included ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, securing the airway, and emergency blood transfusion. An emergency department thoracotomy was performed, but despite aggressive resuscitation the thoracic injury was fatal. An autopsy revealed transection of the aorta by an impaled barb. We present a review of stingray injuries and suggest a general approach to management., (Copyright © 2019 Wilderness Medical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The management of cardiac trauma requires rapid intervention in the emergency room, facilitated by a surgeon with prior experience to have good outcomes. Many surgeons have little experience in the requisite procedures. We report here 4 patients who suffered cardiac trauma, and all 4 patients survived with good neurologic outcomes., Case Presentations: Patient 1 suffered blunt cardiac trauma from a motor vehicle accident and presented in shock. Cardiac tamponade was diagnosed and a cardiac rupture repaired with staples through a median sternotomy after rapid transport to the operating room. Patient 2 suffered blunt cardiac trauma and presented in shock with cardiac tamponade. Operating room median sternotomy allowed extraction of pericardial clot with recovery of physiologic stability. Patient 3 presented with self-inflicted stab wounds to the chest and was unstable. She was brought to the operating room and thoracotomy allowed identification of a left ventricle wound which was repaired with a suture. Patient 4 presented in cardiac arrest with multiple self-inflicted stab wounds to the chest. Emergency room thoracotomy allowed repair of a right ventricle laceration with recovery of vital signs., Conclusions: The management of all 4 patients was according to the principles taught in the ATOM course. Three of the 4 surgeons had no prior experience with management of cardiac trauma and credited the good outcomes to taking the ATOM course. These are uncommon injuries and formal training in their management is beneficial to patients.

Cardiac injury can occur in the setting of blunt and penetrating trauma resulting in significantly adverse clinical outcomes. Although the clinical presentation is variable and computed tomographic imaging is rarely performed to specifically evaluate for cardiac injury, the ability to recognize the findings of cardiac injury on computed tomographic examinations performed for thoracic trauma is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and direct potentially lifesaving interventions. This article reviews the direct and indirect computed tomographic findings of cardiac injury., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Assessment of suspected cardiac injuries in a trauma setting is a challenging and time-critical matter, with clinical and imaging findings having complementary roles in the formation of an accurate diagnosis. In this article, we review the supporting literature for the pathophysiology, classification and evaluation of cardiac injuries caused by trauma. We also describe 4 cardiac trauma patients seen at a tertiary referral hospital., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Patients with traumatic cardiac injuries can present with wide variability in their severity of illness. The most severe will present in cardiac arrest, whereas the most benign may be altogether asymptomatic; most will fall somewhere in between. Management of cardiac injuries largely depends on mechanism of injury and patient physiology. Understanding the spectrum of injuries and their associated manifestations can help providers react more quickly and initiate potentially life-saving therapies more efficiently when time is critical. This article discusses the workup and management of both blunt and penetrating cardiac injuries., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the lethality of injuries to the heart, optimizing factors that impact mortality for victims that do survive to reach the hospital is critical., Methods: From 2003 to 2012, prehospital data, injury characteristics, and clinical patient factors were analyzed for victims with penetrating cardiac injuries (PCIs) at an urban, level I trauma center., Results: Over the 10-year study, 80 PCI patients survived to reach the hospital. Of the 21 factors analyzed, prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio [OR] = 30), scene time greater than 10 minutes (OR = 58), resuscitative thoracotomy (OR = 19), and massive left hemothorax (OR = 15) had the greatest impact on mortality. Cardiac tamponade physiology demonstrated a "protective" effect for survivors to the hospital (OR = .08)., Conclusions: Trauma surgeons can improve mortality after PCI by minimizing time to the operating room for early control of hemorrhage. In PCI patients, tamponade may provide a physiologic advantage (lower mortality) compared to exsanguination., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subxiphoid pericardial window (SPW) remains a valuable diagnostic tool for patients at risk of occult cardiac injuries. However, how to select patients that could benefit from this procedure remains unclear. We aimed to identify clinical predictors of positive SPW in patients with penetrating precordial injuries., Materials and Methods: Prospective data collection of 183 patients who underwent SPW for the exclusion of penetrating cardiac injuries during 2002 - 2004 at a level I trauma centre in Cali, Colombia. Patient's demographics, clinical characteristics, and injury information were obtained. Independent predictors of positive SPW were assessed using stepwise logistic regressions., Results: There were 41 positive SPW (22.4%). Unadjusted analyses demonstrated that stab/knife wounds (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.17-5.25, p = 0.017), single wound (OR 14.61, 95% CI 1.9-110, p = 0.009), and clinical signs of pericardiac tamponade (OR 8.52, 95% CI 3.92-18.4, p < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of positive SPW. Conversely, systolic blood pressure (0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) and stable physiological index (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.65, p = 0.002) were associated with decreased odds. In multivariable analyses, signs of pericardiac tamponade (OR 6.37, 95% CI 2.78-14.6, p < 0.001), and single injuries (OR 12.99, 95% CI 1.6-102.7, p = 0.015) remained as independent predictors of positive SPW., Conclusion: Emphasis on early recognition of the clinical signs of pericardiac tamponade could be the most important factor for the identification of occult cardiac injuries. Patients with multiple wounds to the precordial region who reached the hospital may not benefit from a SPW. However, high level of awareness is important because the incidence of occult cardiac injuries is not negligible., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared

Introduction: A pneumopericardium presenting after penetrating chest trauma is a rare event. The surgical management of this clinical problem has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to document the mode of presentation and to suggest a protocol for management., Patient and Methods: A review of a prospectively collected cardiac database of patients presenting to Groote Schuur Hospital Trauma Centre between October 2001 and February 2009 with a pneumopericardium on chest X-ray after penetrating trauma., Results: There were 27 patients with a pneumopericardium (mean age 25 years, range 17-36). The mechanism of injury was a stab wound to the chest in 26 patients and a single patient with multiple low velocity gunshot wounds. Six patients (22%) were unstable and required emergency surgery. One of these patients presented with a tension pneumopericardium. Twenty-one patients were initially stable. Two of these (10%) patients later developed a tension pneumopericardium within 24-h and were taken to theatre. The remaining 19 patients were managed with a subxiphoid pericardial window (SPW) at between 24 and 48h post admission. Ten of these 19 patients (52%) were positive for a haemopericardium. Only 4 of the 19 underwent a sternotomy and only two of these had cardiac injuries that had sealed. There were no deaths in this series., Conclusion: Patients with a penetrating chest injury with a pneumopericardium who are unstable require emergency surgery. A delayed tension pneumopericardium developed in 10% of patients who were initially stable. It is our recommendation that all stable patients with a pneumopericardium after penetrating chest trauma should undergo a SPW. A sternotomy is not required in stable patients., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)