Search

Objective: To compare the effects of unilateral thoracic paravertebal block with lidocaine on hemodynamic and the level of consciousness during double lumen endotracheal intubation., Methods: From June to october 2021, a total of 40 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ-Ⅱ, aged 19-65 years, scheduled for elective thoracic sugeries in Peking University International Hospital block with under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were recruited and divided into two groups: The double-lumen endobronchial intubation (group C) and double-lumen endobronchial intubation after thoracic paravertebal block with lidocaine (group P). After an intravenous anesthetic induction, the orotracheal double-lumen intubation was performed using a Macintosh direct laryngoscopy, respectively. Invasive blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before and after anesthetic induction, immediately after intubation and 5 min after intubation with 1-minute interval and the intubation time was also noted. Rate-pressure product (RPP) were calculated., Results: After anesthetic induction, BP and RPP in the two groups decreased significantly compared with their preinduction values. As comparison with their postinduction values, the orotracheal intubation in the two groups caused significant increases in BP, HR and RPP. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased significantly and lasted for 1-minute in group C compared with the baseline values. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was not significant change and DBP increased significantly immediately after intubation in group P.HR of both groups after intubation were significantly higher than their baseline values and lasted for 4 min in group C, HR increased significantly immediately after intubation in group P. SBP, DBP, MAP, HR and RPP after intubation in group P were significantly lower than those of group C during the observation period. The value of BIS was similar between the two groups. Compared with group C, the incidence of SBP greater than 30% and RPP greater than 22 000 was significantly lower in group P in the observation period, and no patient in group P developed RPP greater than 22 000. At the end of the incidence of SBP less than 30% of the basal value and HR less than 30% of the baseline, no severe bradycardia occurred in both groups., Conclusion: During double-lumen endobronchial intubation, unilateral thoracic paravertebal block with lidocaine can provide less hemodynamic response and level of conscionsness.

Background: The inappropriate management of pain after thoracotomy results in serious complications. Several adjuvants have been added to the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) to enhance its effects. This work aimed to evaluate the effect of adding ketamine to TPVB on thoracotomy-related acute and chronic pain., Methods: This randomized controlled double-blinded trial included 60 patients scheduled for open thoracotomy. Patients were equally randomized into 2 groups: group K: received TPVB + 1 mL ketamine (50 mg). Group C (n = 30): received TPVB (19 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine + 1 mL normal saline) as a control arm., Results: Group K exhibited a significant delay in requesting analgesia, required less morphine in the first 24 and 48 hours, and reported lower numerical rating scale at rest and at deep breathing at various time points compared with the control group. However, both groups were comparable in post-thoracotomy pain syndrome and the incidence of complications at 2 months and 3 months., Conclusions: Adding ketamine to TPVB resulted in better analgesia as demonstrated by significantly delayed time to first rescue analgesia, lower total amount of consumed opioid, and pain score without considerable effect on chronic pain and complications in patients undergoing thoracotomy., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.)

Background: In daily surgical practice, inguinal hernioplasty is a frequent procedure that is frequently accompanied by severe postoperative pain. Multiple regional blocks have been described for analgesia after such operations. Retrolaminar block (RLB) is a paravertebral block (PVB) variant that provides excellent analgesia and reduces the risk of complications. This prospective trial compared the analgesic efficacy of PVB and RLB in the inguinal hernioplasty., Methods: The 56 patients included were randomly assigned into two equal groups according to the block performed under ultrasound guidance at the T12 level: PVB group (28 patients) and RLB (28 patients). Time until the first rescue analgesia was our primary outcome. Other outcomes included the time to perform the block, changes in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, postoperative VAS, 24-h morphine consumption, the level of patient satisfaction, and the incidence of block-related complications., Results: Demographic data were comparable in the two groups. However, the time needed for the block was significantly shortened with the RLB (p < 0.001). Patients in the PVB groups expressed better pain scores and lower opioid consumption. Additionally, the time to the first call for opioid analgesia showed a significant prolongation in association with the PVB. There was no discernible difference in the frequency of adverse events and recorded MAP and HR., Conclusion: The PVB has a superior perioperative analgesic profile compared to the RLB, which manifested in the prolonged duration to the first rescue analgesics, better pain scores, and less opioid consumption, with no significant increase in block-related complications., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Proximal femur fracture surgeries have become increasingly prevalent, presenting unique challenges for postoperative pain management due to patient demographics and comorbidities. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a relatively safe alternative to paravertebral block (PVB). Our aim was to compare ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB with continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia., Methods: A prospective randomized interventional study was conducted on 60 patients between 18 and 60 years of age undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II between January 2019 and April 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB (Group E, n = 30) or ultrasound-guided continuous PVB (Group P, n = 30) using a computer-generated randomization table. The mean maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score, VAS score in the first 24 h, the time of rescue analgesia, and total requirement of rescue analgesia were assessed., Results: The maximum VAS score within the first 24 h was numerically higher in Group P but statistically insignificant ( p -value 0.279). VAS scores at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 18 h postoperatively were comparable in both groups. However, at the 24-h mark, the VAS score between Group E and Group P was statistically significant ( p -value 0.018) but not clinically relevant. The mean paracetamol and tramadol requirements were comparable between the two groups., Conclusion: Continuous ESPB is as effective as continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in proximal femur surgeries. The enhanced safety profile of erector spinae block underscores its significance in postoperative pain management., (© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter.)

Background/Objectives: The paravertebral block (PVB) is a well-studied, effective method of analgesia for breast surgery. Alternative techniques involving the blockage of intercostal nerve branches are the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). However, no studies comparing both fascial blocks to PVB in breast surgery have been published to date. We evaluated the effectiveness of ESPB and SAPB vs. PVB, expressed as the requirement for intraoperative fentanyl, pain intensity at rest and during coughing, and morphine consumption on the first postoperative day. Additional aims were to perform an evaluation of the safety of the block types used. Materials and Methods : A total of 77 women and 1 man with stage I and II clinical breast cancer, aged 18-85 years, were randomized into one of three study groups: SAPB, PVB, and ESPB. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in fentanyl consumption during surgery with respect to the type of block used ( p = 0.4246). Morphine consumption in the postoperative period was highest in the ESPB group, averaging 9.4 mg. There was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity from 4 pm on the day of surgery to 8 am the following morning. No complications related to the blocks were observed on the first postoperative day. Conclusions: Both the serratus anterior plane block and the erector spinae plane block were as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving intraoperative analgesia. The serratus anterior plane block was equally as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving postoperative analgesia. The erector spinae plane block was significantly less effective in achieving postoperative analgesia than both the paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block.

Background and Aims: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional anesthesia technique compared to the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in providing postoperative pain relief in breast surgeries. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is a commonly performed surgery for breast cancer. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of ESPB and TPVB in providing postoperative pain relief after MRM., Material and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sixty ASA I-III adult patients (age >18 years) scheduled to undergo elective unilateral MRM for breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Ultrasound-guided ESPB or TPVB with 0.25% bupivacaine was performed preoperatively on the patients randomized into two groups, namely, the ESPB and TPVB groups. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Morphine consumption and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively., Results: Primarily, the mean postoperative VAS scores between the two groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h showed no statistical significance and were comparable when matched at different time points. However, 24-h morphine consumption was significantly more in the ESPB group ( P = 0.035). Duration of block performance also showed a significant difference, with ESPB taking less time to perform ( P < 0.001). The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of patients and length of hospital stay in both the groups were similar., Conclusions: Both ESPB and TPVB provided adequate analgesia in patients undergoing MRM; however, TPVB had better efficacy and opioid-sparing effect when compared to ESPB., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background and Aims: The treatment for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) continues to be challenging in clinical pain management. Paravertebral block (PVB) and erector-spinae block (ESPB) are two novel techniques for treating this distressing condition. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of PVB and ESPB in preventing the progression to PHN in patients with acute herpes zoster (AHZ)., Material and Methods: Sixty patients in pain due to AHZ were selected for a prospective randomized control study after approval from Institutional Ethical Committee. Written informed consent was taken. Patients were randomized and allotted into Control-group: standard treatment (oral antivirals, analgesics, neuropathic medicines); PVB-Group: standard treatment with PVB and ESPB- Group: standard treatment with ESPB. Under ultrasound guidance, both blocks were administered with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine + dexamethasone 8 mg. Efficacy was evaluated on the 15 th , 30 th , and 60 th day post treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with adequate relief from pain and allodynia post study., Results: The incidence of PHN post study was 45% in the ESPB group and 40% in the PVB group and 80% in the control group ( p = 0.022). The proportion of patients with pain relief was higher among the PVB group compared to the ESPB group but not statistically significant ( p 0.749). On day 60, the mean pain score was 2.45 (±3.05) and 2.15 (±2.7) in ESPB and PVB groups, respectively, and 4.3 (±2.27) in the control group ( p 0.003)., Conclusion: PVB and ESPB are effective approaches in treating patients suffering from pain due to acute zoster and help in preventing its progression to PHN., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.)

Purpose: To compare the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) on the quality of postoperative recovery (QoR) of patients following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)., Methods: A total of 110 patients who underwent elective LSG under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB or PVB at T8 levels. Before anesthesia induction, 40 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine was administered. The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score at 24 hours postoperatively., Results: At 24 hours postoperatively, the QoR-15 score was comparable between the ESPB and PVB groups (131 (112-140) vs. 124 (111-142.5), P  = 0.525). Consistently, there was no significant difference in QoR-15 scores at 48 hours postoperatively, numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at any postoperative time points, time to first ambulation, time to first anal exhaust, postoperative cumulative oxycodone consumption, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between the two groups (all P  > 0.05). No nerve block-related complications were observed in either group., Conclusion: In patients undergoing LSG, preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB yields comparable postoperative recovery to preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided PVB., Competing Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests., (©2024 Yang et al.)

Objectives: Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) are well known to reduce pain levels after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, the relative efficacies of each block and a combination of the 2 have not been fully characterized. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of PVB alone, SAPB alone and the combination of PVB and SAPB with regard to the occurrence and intensity of pain after VATS., Methods: We conducted the THORACOSOPIC single-centre, double-blind, randomized trial in adult patients due to undergo elective VATS lung resection. The participants were randomized to PVB only, SAPB only and PVB + SAPB groups. The primary end-point was pain on coughing on admission to the postanaesthesia care unit. The secondary end-points were postoperative pain at rest and on coughing at other time points and the cumulative opioid consumption. Pain was scored on a visual analogue scale., Results: One-hundred and fifty-six patients (52 in each group) were included. On admission to the postanaesthesia care unit, the 3 groups did not differ significantly with regard to the pain on coughing: the visual analogue scale score was 3 (0-6), 4 (0-8) and 2 (0-6) in the PVB, SAPB and PVB + SAPB groups, respectively (P = 0.204). During postoperative care, the overall pain score was significantly lower in the SABP + PVP group at rest and on cough., Conclusions: The combination of SABP + PVB could be beneficial for pain management in VATS in comparison to SABP or PVB alone., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Introduction: Zoster-associated pain (ZAP) treatment and management is still inadequate. Repeated intervention protocol is often applied to manage ZAP. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the effect of repeated applications of pulsed radiofrequency therapy on controlling acute/subacute ZAP., Methods: From March 2019 to December 2021, 150 patients with acute/subacute ZAP who underwent repeated application of pulsed radiofrequency treatment (R-PRF) and pulsed radiofrequency combined paravertebral block interventions (PRF + PVB) in the Pain Department of the affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University were enrolled. Patients were grouped by intervention protocol and received at least 12 months of follow-up assessments using the Numerical Rating Scale score (NRSs), Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Simple McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 score (SF-MPQ-2s), and follow-up interventions., Results: Both groups experienced a reduction in the incidence of clinically meaningful ZAP after the intervention therapy. In the R-PRF group, there were 36 cases of clinically meaningful ZAP within the first month post-treatment, while the PRF + PVB group had 38 cases. The incidence of clinically meaningful ZAP, as determined by multivariable generalized estimating equations, was 42.86% in the R-PRF group and 57.58% in the PRF + PVB group during the first month of follow-up. There was a significant difference in the incidence of clinically meaningful ZAP between the two groups after 1 month of treatment (adjusted odds ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.91; p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Both R-PRF and PRF + PVB treatments effectively relieve pain in patients with acute/subacute ZAP. However, R-PRF may have superior efficacy compared to PRF + PVB in reducing the incidence of clinically meaningful ZAP 1 month after treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) is an effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced gastric cancer and liver metastasis. However, it may cause severe postoperative pain and inflammatory responses. The paravertebral block (PVB) is a regional anesthetic technique that provides analgesia to the thoracic and abdominal regions., Aim: To evaluate the effect of PVB on postoperative analgesia and inflammatory response in patients undergoing TACE combined with MWA for advanced gastric cancer and liver metastasis., Methods: Sixty patients were randomly divided into PVB and control groups. The PVB group received ultrasound-guided PVB with 0.375% ropivacaine preoperatively, whereas the control group received intravenous analgesia with sufentanil. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the dose of sufentanil used, incidence of adverse events, and levels of inflammatory markers (white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin) before and after the procedure., Results: The PVB group had significantly lower VAS scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after the procedure compared with the control group ( P < 0.05). The PVB group also had a significantly lower consumption of sufentanil and a lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression than did the control group ( P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the PVB group had significantly lower levels of inflammatory markers 24 h and 48 h after the procedure ( P < 0.05)., Conclusion: PVB can effectively reduce postoperative pain and inflammatory responses and improve postoperative comfort and recovery in patients with advanced gastric cancer and liver metastasis treated with TACE combined with MWA., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare that there is no disclosure of interest relationship., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pain management plays an essential role in postoperative recovery after lung surgeries. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a widely used regional anaesthesia technique; however, few clinical trials have compared this block to active control in thoracic surgeries. This study evaluated the non-inferiority of the analgesia provided by ESPB when compared to paravertebral block (PVB) in lung surgeries., Methods: Randomised, active-controlled, blinded for patients and assessors, non-inferiority trial. Patients who underwent unilateral lung surgeries were divided into two groups according to the regional anaesthesia technique-continuous ESPB or PVB at the T5 level. The primary outcome was to assess pain using a numerical rating scale (NRS) with a test of the interaction of three measures over 24 h postoperatively. An NRS score ≥ 7 was considered analgesia failure, and the prespecified non-inferiority margin was 10%., Results: In the interim analysis that terminated this study, 120 participants were enrolled. ESPB patients reported higher mean NRS general values over 24 h, 4.6 ± 3.2 in the ESPB group versus 3.9 ± 2.9 in the PVB group, with a difference of -0.67 (-15.2%) and 95%CI: -1.29 to -0.05 (p = .02), demonstrating not non-inferiority. In addition, the ESPB group presented higher NRS failure of analgesia over 24 h (p < .01) and required more postoperative opioids (p = .01 over 24 h). There was no difference in patient satisfaction between groups., Conclusion: This trial demonstrated that a continuous erector spinae plane block was not non-inferior to a continuous paravertebral block for analgesia after lung surgery but resulted in higher levels of postoperative pain and opioid consumption., (© 2023 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Background and Aims: Paravertebral block (PVB) is the regional anaesthesia of choice for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is also effective for the same. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and ease of performing PVB or ESPB for PCNL surgery., Methods: This study was conducted in 60 patients undergoing PCNL, who were randomised to Group P ( n = 30; received ultrasound-guided [USG] PVB) and Group E ( n = 30; received USG ESPB) after general anaesthesia. Blocks were administered at T10 level on the side of the surgery using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The trachea was extubated at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was analgesia duration, and secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, ease of block performance, time taken to perform the block and complications between the two groups. Continuous variables were compared using an independent sample t -test, and categorical variables were analysed using Pearson's Chi-square test., Results: Demographic variables were comparable in both groups. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time of first rescue analgesia in Group P and Group E were 16.6 (20.4)(95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.02-20.32) h and 16.3 (21.8) (95% CI: 8.17-24.51) h, respectively ( P = 0.95). The postoperative pain scores and number of doses of analgesics used were comparable between the groups ( P > 0.05). The time taken to perform PVB was much longer compared to the time taken to perform ESPB ( P = 0.01)., Conclusion: USG PVB and ESPB were equally effective for postoperative analgesia for PCNL surgery., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.)

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has become an increasingly common management strategy for traumatic rib fractures. Although historically managed with supportive care, patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest increasingly undergo SSRF, and so the anesthesiologist must be well-versed in the perioperative management and pain control for these patients, as controlling pain in this population is associated with decreased length of stay and improved outcomes. There are multiple modalities that can be used for both pain control and as part of the anesthetic plan in patients undergoing SSRF. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of anesthetic considerations for surgical rib fracture patients, covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. We describe an approach to the assessment of high-risk patients, analgesic and anesthetic techniques including emerging techniques within locoregional anesthesia, ventilation strategies, and potential complications. This review also identifies areas where additional research is needed to ensure optimal anesthetic management for patients undergoing SSRF., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None. There are no competing interests to declare., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Thoracotomy is considered one of the most painful surgical procedures and can cause debilitating chronic post-surgical pain lasting months or years postoperatively. Aggressive management of acute pain resulting from thoracotomy may reduce the likelihood of developing chronic pain. This trial compares the two most commonly used modes of acute analgesia provision at the time of thoracotomy (thoracic epidural blockade (TEB) and paravertebral blockade (PVB)) in terms of their clinical and cost-effectiveness in preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain., Methods: TOPIC 2 is a multi-centre, open-label, parallel group, superiority, randomised controlled trial, with an internal pilot investigating the use of TEB and PVB in 1026 adult (≥ 18 years old) patients undergoing thoracotomy in up to 20 thoracic centres throughout the UK. Patients (N = 1026) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TEB or PVB. During the first year, the trial will include an integrated QuinteT (Qualitative Research Integrated into Trials) Recruitment Intervention (QRI) with the aim of optimising recruitment and informed consent. The primary outcome is the incidence of chronic post-surgical pain at 6 months post-randomisation defined as 'worst chest pain over the last week' equating to a visual analogue score greater than or equal to 40 mm indicating at least a moderate level of pain. Secondary outcomes include acute pain, complications of regional analgesia and surgery, health-related quality of life, mortality and a health economic analysis., Discussion: Both TEB and PVB have been demonstrated to be effective in the prevention of acute pain following thoracotomy and nationally practice is divided. Identification of which mode of analgesia is both clinically and cost-effective in preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain could ameliorate the debilitating effects of chronic pain, improving health-related quality of life, facilitating return to work and caring responsibilities and resulting in a cost saving to the NHS., Trial Registration: NCT03677856 [ClinicalTrials.gov] registered September 19, 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03677856 . First patient recruited 8 January 2019., (© 2023. Crown.)

Purpose of Review: Rib fractures are a common traumatic injury that has been traditionally treated with systemic opioids and non-opioid analgesics. Due to the adverse effects of opioid analgesics, regional anesthesia techniques have become an increasingly promising alternative. This review article aims to explore the efficacy, safety, and constraints of medical management and regional anesthesia techniques in alleviating pain related to rib fractures., Recent Findings: Recently, opioid analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and paravertebral block (PVB) have been favored options in the pain management of rib fractures. TEA has positive analgesic effects, and many studies vouch for its efficacy; however, it is contraindicated for many patients. PVB is a viable alternative to those with contraindications to TEA and exhibits promising outcomes compared to other regional anesthesia techniques; however, a failure rate of up to 10% and adverse complications challenge its administration in trauma settings. Serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB) and erector spinae blocks (ESPB) serve as practical alternatives to TEA or PVB with lower incidences of adverse effects while exhibiting similar levels of analgesia. ESPB can be performed by trained emergency physicians, making it a feasible procedure to perform that is low-risk and efficient in pain management. Compared to the other techniques, intercostal nerve block (ICNB) had less analgesic impact and required concurrent intravenous medication to achieve comparable outcomes to the other blocks. The regional anesthesia techniques showed great success in improving pain scores and expediting recovery in many patients. However, choosing the optimal technique may not be so clear and will depend on the patient's case and the team's preferences. The peripheral nerve blocks have impressive potential in the future and may very well surpass neuraxial techniques; however, further research is needed to prove their efficacy and weaknesses., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block on thoracoscopic surgery., Methods: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through March 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block on thoracoscopic surgery. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model., Results: Seven RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with erector spinae plane block for thoracoscopic surgery, paravertebral block results in significantly reduced pain scores at 12 h (SMD = 1.12; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.81; P = 0.002) and postoperative anesthesia consumption (SMD = 1.27; 95% CI 0.30 to 2.23; P = 0.01), but these two groups have similar pain scores at 1-2 h (SMD = 1.01; 95% CI - 0.13 to 2.15; P 0.08) and 4-6 h (SMD = 0.33; 95% CI - 0.16 to 0.81; P = 0.19), as well as incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.38 to 2.29; P = 0.88)., Conclusions: Paravertebral block may be better for the pain relief after thoracoscopic surgery than erector spinae plane block., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a common method of inducing perioperative analgesia in thoracic and abdominal surgery. Identifying anatomical structures in ultrasound images is very important especially for inexperienced anesthesiologists who are unfamiliar with the anatomy. Therefore, our aim was to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) to automatically identify (in real-time) anatomical structures in ultrasound images of TPVB. This study is a retrospective study using ultrasound scans (both video and standard still images) that we acquired. We marked the contours of the paravertebral space (PVS), lung, and bone in the TPVB ultrasound image. Based on the labeled ultrasound images, we used the U-net framework to train and create an ANN that enabled real-time identification of important anatomical structures in ultrasound images. A total of 742 ultrasound images were acquired and labeled in this study. In this ANN, the Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC or Dice coefficient) of the paravertebral space (PVS) were 0.75 and 0.86, respectively, the IoU and DSC of the lung were 0.85 and 0.92, respectively, and the IoU and DSC of the bone were 0.69 and 0.83, respectively. The accuracies of the PVS, lung, and bone were 91.7%, 95.4%, and 74.3%, respectively. For tenfold cross validation, the median interquartile range for PVS IoU and DSC was 0.773 and 0.87, respectively. There was no significant difference in the scores for the PVS, lung, and bone between the two anesthesiologists. We developed an ANN for the real-time automatic identification of thoracic paravertebral anatomy. The performance of the ANN was highly satisfactory. We conclude that AI has good prospects for use in TPVB. Clinical registration number: ChiCTR2200058470 (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=152839 ; registration date: 2022-04-09)., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.)

Scapular surgery has mainly been studied in the setting of fractures; regional anesthesia can be utilized as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen for postoperative pain relief. Previous studies are limited to scapular fracture pain. The available literature supports the use of various types of nerve blocks and even combinations of different blocks, of which the paravertebral nerve block is one such block that has been effective. We present a case of a patient undergoing excision of a scapular osteochondroma who received a single-shot paravertebral nerve block after surgery with an effective analgesia.

Background: To investigate the effects of body mass index (BMI) on intensity postoperative pain in patients who underwent thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for postoperative analgesia after video-assissted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)., Methods: Patients aged 18-80 years, ASA I-III, and BMI 18-40 kg/m 2 who underwent elective VATS were included in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to their BMI levels. TPVB was performed under ultrasound-guidance at the fifth thoracic vertebrae, and 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. The patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was performed by using morphine and multimodal analgesia was performed. As a rescue analgesic agent, 0.5 mg/kg tramadol was given to patients intravenously when a score of visual analog scale (VAS) at rest was ≥ 4. The primary outcome was determined as VAS scores at rest and cough. Secondary outcomes were determined as postoperative morphine consumption, additional analgesic requirement, and side effects., Results: The post-hoc test revealed that the VAS resting scores at the 4 th hour (p: 0.007), 12 th hour (p: 0.014), and 48 th hour (p: 0.002) were statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II. Additionally, VAS resting scores were also statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group III at all time points (p < 0.05). Similarly, the post-hoc test indicated that the VAS coughing scores at the 4 th hour (p: 0.023), 12 th hour (p: 0.011), and 48 th hour (p: 0.019) were statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II. Moreover, VAS coughing scores were statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group III at all time points (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in terms of additional analgesic use between the groups (p: 0.001). Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference in terms of morphine consumption via PCA and morphine milligram equivalent consumption between the groups (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Higher postoperative VAS scores with TPVB applied in obese patients and the consequent increase in additional analgesics and complications require more specific postoperative management in this patient group., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Surgery to repair pectus excavatum (PE) is often associated with severe postoperative pain, which can impact the length of hospital stay (LOS). While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has traditionally been used for pain management in PE, its placement can sometimes result in severe neurological complications. Recently, paravertebral block (PVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been recommended for many other chest and abdominal surgeries. However, due to the more severe and prolonged pain associated with PE repair, it is still unclear whether continuous administration of these blocks is as effective as TEA. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate the equivalence of continuous PVB and ESPB to TEA., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background General anesthesia (GA) is a standard for breast malignant surgery. The issue of postoperative pain as well as the high occurrence of nausea and vomiting have prompted the quest for a superior methodology for tormenting the executives with fewer complications. Over the most recent couple of years, paravertebral block (PVB) has acquired huge fame either in combination with GA or alone for anesthetic management. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of morphine and clonidine as an adjunct to ropivacaine in PVB in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Methods In this study, a total of 90 patients were divided into the following three groups (30 each) based on a computer-generated random table. Group C (control): PVB with 0.25% ropivacaine (19 ml) 1 ml saline; Group M: PVB with 0.25% ropivacaine (19 ml) + 20 microgram/kg body weight morphine; Group N: PVB with 0.25% ropivacaine (19 ml) + 1.0 microgram/kg body weight clonidine. The postoperative pain intensity was recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS), and sedation was observed by the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score. Results The VAS was similar at zero hours, two hours, and four hours in the postoperative period among all the groups. There was a significant (p = 0.003) difference in VAS from six hours to 20 hours in the postoperative period among the groups. A significant (p < 0.05) difference was observed among the groups at eight hours to 20 hours. The first requirement of analgesia was significantly (p = 0.001) higher in Group N (7.70 ± 1.74) than in Group C (4.43 ± 1.43) and Group M (7.33 ± 2.21). Conclusion Morphine in the PVB provides better postoperative analgesia. The consumption of rescue analgesia was significantly reduced in the morphine group as compared to the clonidine group. The procedure also proved to be safe as no complication was encountered in the PVB in our study., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Kumar et al.)

Background: The intercostobrachial nerve blockade is required, in addition to brachial plexus block, to anesthetize the entire upper arm. No studies have described the use of erector spinae plane (ESP) block for an intercostobrachial nerve block., Case Presentation: A 72-year-old man was scheduled to undergo left brachial vein transposition-arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis access. An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using a mixture of 0.5% levobupivacaine (12.5 ml) and 2% lidocaine (12.5 ml). An ESP block was implemented using 10 ml of the same local anesthetic at the T2 level. A pinprick test showed that the entire upper arm and lateral aspect of the left upper chest wall were anesthetized 20 min after the blocks. Surgery was successfully performed without the need for general anesthesia., Conclusions: In the present case, an ESP block performed at the T2 level provided sensory loss of the area innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve., (© 2023. The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.)

Background: Bariatric surgical patients are vulnerable to cardiopulmonary depressant effects of opioids. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to improve postoperative morbidity recommends regional anesthesia for postoperative pain management. However, there is limited evidence that peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have added benefit., Objective: Study the effect of PNB on postoperative pain and opioid use following bariatric surgery., Setting: Academic medical center, United States., Methods: We conducted a cohort study of patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. A total of 44 patients received the control ERAS protocol with preoperative oral extended-release morphine sulfate (MS), while 45 patients underwent a PNB with either intrathecal morphine (IM) or oral MS per local ERAS protocol. The PNB group either underwent preoperative bilateral T7 paravertebral (PVT) PNBs (27 patients) with IM or postoperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) PNBs (18 patients) with oral MS. The primary outcome compared total opioid consumption between the ERAS control group and the PNB group up to 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included comparison by block type and postoperative pain scores., Results: PVT or TAP PNB patients had a reduction in mean postoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) requirements compared with the ERAS protocol cohort at 24 hours (93.9 versus 42.8 mg), P < .0001; at 48 hours (72.6 versus 40.5 mg); and in pain scores at 24 hours (5.64/10 versus 4.46/10), P = .02. OME and pain scores were higher in the SG cohort., Conclusion: Addition of truncal PNB to standard ERAS protocol for bariatric surgical patients reduces postoperative total opioid consumption., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The primary objectives of the study were to analyse the robotic approach and ultrasound-guided paravertebral block compared to thoracoscopic intercostal nerve block after robotic pulmonary lobectomy on postoperative pain and opioids use. The secondary objectives were to analyse and compare patients' necessity of additional antalgic drugs and patients' performance during respiratory therapy, following robotic surgery and in the two groups. Consecutively, 52 patients undergoing robotic pulmonary lobectomies were treated either with ropivacaine-based intercostal nerve block or paravertebral block from February 2022 to October 2022. When necessary, morphine was administered at day 1. Acetaminophen was administered as an additional antalgic drug on demand up to 3 g per day. Pain was measured 1 h after the end of the surgical procedure and daily through the pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Morphine administration rate and per day and total additional administrations of acetaminophen were recorded. Pain and opioids administration was measured 1 month after the procedure. Data were analysed in the overall population and in the intercostal nerve block group VS paravertebral block group. Overall, 34.6% of the patients required morphine administration and 51.7% of the patients required at least daily acetaminophen administration up to discharge. At 1 month postoperatively, four patients presented with chronic pain and one still was under opioid medication. At intergroup analysis, the paravertebral block group demonstrated lower NRS at fixed time points (p < 0.0001) and lower morphine consumption (45.7%VS11.8%; p = 0.02). Acetaminophen rescue administration at fixed time points was lower in the paravertebral block group (p < 0.0001) and mobility and dynamic pain resulted in better results (p = 0.03; p = 0.04). At 1 month, no differences were found between study groups. Similarly to other minimally invasive techniques, postoperative pain may arise after robotic pulmonary lobectomy. Paravertebral bloc can help to reduce postoperative pain as well as morphine and antalgic drugs administration and improve early mobilization., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Adequate pain management after thoracoscopic surgery is a major issue in the prevention of respiratory complications. The combination of the paravertebral block (PVB) with the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) may decrease postoperative pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the combination of PVB and SAPB on the consumption of morphine and pain after video- or robot-assisted thoracic surgery., Methods: The main objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the cumulative postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h between a group having PVB (PVB group) and a group having PVB and SAPB (PV-SAPB group). Postoperative pain at 6 and 24 h and morphine-related complications were also assessed., Results: A total of 112 patients were included with 56 in each group. There was no difference in median cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h between the 2 groups (P = 0.1640). At 6 h, the median postoperative pain was higher in the PVB group compared to the PV-SAPB group (3 [0; 4] vs 2 [0; 3], P = 0.0231). There were no differences between the 2 groups for pain at 24 h and morphine-related complications., Conclusions: We did not find any difference in morphine consumption between the 2 groups. Our results suggest that the combination of PVB and SAPB for video-assisted thoracic surgery or robot-assisted thoracic surgery is safe effective and reliable and could be an alternative to PVB alone in certain indications., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study examined the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-injection pectoral fascial plane (PECS) II blocks compared to paravertebral blocks for elective robotic mitral valve surgery., Design: A single-center retrospective study that reported patient and procedural characteristics, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative opioid use for patients undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery., Setting: This investigation was performed at a large quaternary referral center., Participants: Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted to the authors' hospital from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective robotic mitral valve repair who received either a paravertebral or PECS II block for postoperative analgesia., Interventions: Patients received an ultrasound-guided, unilateral paravertebral or PECS II nerve block., Measurements and Main Results: One hundred twenty-three patients received a PECS II block, and 190 patients received a paravertebral block during the study period. The primary outcome measures were average postoperative pain scores and cumulative opioid use. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, need for reoperation, need for antiemetics, surgical wound infection, and atrial fibrillation incidence. Patients receiving the PECS II block required significantly fewer opioids in the immediate postoperative period than the paravertebral block group, and had comparable postoperative pain scores. No increase in adverse outcomes was noted for either group., Conclusions: The PECS II block is a safe and highly effective option for regional analgesia for robotic mitral valve surgery, with demonstrated efficacy comparable to the paravertebral block., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The prevention of respiratory complications is a major issue after thoracic surgery for lung cancer, and requires adequate post-operative pain management. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) may decrease post-operative pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of ESPB on pain after video or robot-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS or RATS)., Methods: The main outcome of this retrospective study with a propensity score analysis (PSA) was to compare the post-operative pain at 24 h at rest and at cough between a group that received ESPB and a group that received paravertebral block (PVB). Post-operative morphine consumption at 24 h and complications were also assessed., Results: One hundred and seven patients were included: 54 in the ESPB group and 53 in the PVB group. The post-operative median pain score at rest and cough was lower in the ESPB group compared to the PVB group at 24 h (respectively, at rest 2 [1; 3.5] vs. 2 [0; 4], p = 0.0181, with PSA; ESPB -0.80 [-1.50; -0.10], p = 0.0255, and at cough (4 [3; 6] vs. 5 [4; 6], p = 0.0261, with PSA; ESPB -1.48 [-2.65; -0.31], p = 0.0135). There were no differences between groups concerning post-operative morphine consumption at 24 h and respiratory complications., Conclusions: Our results suggest that ESPB is associated with less post-operative pain at 24 h than PVB after VATS or RATS for lung cancer. Furthermore, ESPB is an acceptable and safe alternative compared to PVB.

Erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block can provide analgesia for abdominal surgery. It is unclear whether erector spinae block is inferior to paravertebral block. We aimed to determine whether sufentanil dose and pain intensity (11-point scale) to 24 h after erector spinae block exceeded those after paravertebral block by no more than 5 μg and 1 point, respectively. We randomly allocated 166 adults to 0.4 ml.kg -1 ropivacaine 0.375% before scheduled laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, 83 each to erector spinae or paravertebral injection. We measured incision pain and intra-abdominal pain at rest and on movement 0.5 h, 2 h, 6 h, 18 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery. Median (IQR [range]) cumulative sufentanil dose after erector spinae block was 15 (5-30 [0-105]) μg vs. 20 (10-50 [0-145]) μg after paravertebral block, median (95%CI) difference 5 μg (0-10), erector spinae non-inferiority p < 0.001. Median (IQR [range]) pain were 1.5 (1.0-2.0 [0.0-5.3]) after erector spinae block vs. 2.0 (1.0-2.5 [0.0-6.0]) after paravertebral block, median (95% CI) difference 0.3 (0.0-0.5), erector spinae non-inferiority p < 0.001. Adverse events did not differ between groups. Erector spinae block analgesia was not inferior to paravertebral block analgesia after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy., (© 2022 Association of Anaesthetists.)

Introduction: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has emerged as an effective and safe regional technique for providing postoperative analgesia. We aimed to compare the ease and efficacy of conventional landmark and ultrasound-guided (USG) paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy., Methods: This was a randomized controlled study. Seventy-six patients of either sex, age 18-40 years, body mass index (BMI) 18-29 kg/m 2 , American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classifications I and II posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups of 38 each. Patients in group A were administered a paravertebral block using the anatomical landmark technique (ALT), and group B using an ultrasound-guided paravertebral block in the sitting position. In both groups, 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine injection was administered at the T7 vertebral level on the right side. The primary outcome was the first-pass success rate. Secondary outcomes were the number of passes and attempts, duration of analgesia, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain during 24 h postoperatively and complications if any, were recorded., Results: No patients were excluded in the study. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. The number of passes was less in group B (1.45±0.5) compared to group A (2.42±0.95) and was reported to be statistically significant (p = 0.001). The number of attempts was less in group B (1.00±0) as compared to group A (1.29±0.46) and was statistically significant (p = 0.001). The duration of analgesia was longer in group B (530.00±326.33 minutes) compared to group A (345.60±252.95 minutes) and was observed to be statistically significant (p<0.05). The VAS score was significantly lower in group B (1.87±0.78, 2.24 ±0.82) compared to group A (2.42±0.72, 3.13±1.07) at the second   and fourth hours, respectively (p = 0.001).  Conclusion: We concluded that paravertebral block using an ultrasound-guided technique is more efficacious than the conventional landmark technique for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Kumar et al.)

Background: Despite advancements in minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), Nuss procedure, postoperative pain control remains challenging. This report covers a multimodal regimen using bilateral single-shot paravertebral block (PVB) and bilateral thoracoscopic intercostal nerve (T3-T7) cryoablation, leading to significant reduction in length of stay (LOS) and high rate of same-day discharge., Methods: This is a comparative study of pain management protocols for patients undergoing the Nuss procedure at a single center from 2016 through 2020. All patients underwent the the same surgical technique for the treatment of pectus excavatum at a single center. Patients received bilateral PVB with continuous infusion (Group 1, n = 12), bilateral PVB with infusion and right-side cryoablation (Group 2, n = 9), or bilateral single-shot PVB and bilateral cryoablation (Group 3, n = 17). The primary outcome was LOS with focus on same-day discharge, and the secondary outcome was decreased opioid usage., Results: Eleven of 17 patients in Group 3 (65%) (bilateral single-shot PVB and bilateral cryoablation) were discharged the same day as surgery. The remaining Group 3 patients were discharged the following day with no complications or interventions. Compared to Group 1 (no cryoablation), Group 3 had shorter LOS (median 4.4 days vs. 0.7 days, respectively, p < 0.001) and significantly decreased median opioid use on the day of surgery (0.92 mg/kg vs. 0.47 mg/kg, p = 0.006)., Conclusion: Findings demonstrate the feasibility of multimodal pain management for same-day discharge after the Nuss procedure. Future multisite studies are needed to investigate the superiority of this approach to established methods., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and safety of non-intubated general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing combined with paravertebral nerve blocks (PVNB) in young children undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and to determine its significance for rapid recovery after pediatric thoracic surgery., Methods: The data of 46 children aged 6-36 months with an American Society of Anesthesiologists status of I-II who underwent elective VATS under general anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 25 underwent non-intubated general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing combined with PVNB (non-intubation group), and 21 received conventional intubated general anesthesia combined with local infiltration anesthesia (intubation group). The following perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups: heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ), partial pressure end-tidal carbon dioxide, time from the completion of the operation to extubation or removing laryngeal masks, time to first feeding after the operation, length of postoperative in-hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and hospitalization expenses., Results: The operations were completed successfully in both groups. When the non-intubation group was compared with the intubation group, the minimal SpO 2 level during the surgery was higher (93% vs. 88%, P  < 0.001), which might indicate better oxygenation. There was no significant difference of the duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss between two groups. Compared to the intubation group, the duration of anesthesia ( P  = 0.027), time from the completion of the operation to extubation ( P  < 0.001), time to the first feeding after surgery ( P  < 0.001), and length of postoperative in-hospital stay ( P  < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the non-intubation group. The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different., Conclusions: Non-intubated general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing combined with PVNB is safe and feasible in young children undergoing VATS and can promote rapid recovery in young children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Huang, Huang, Zhang, Tan and Wang.)

Objective: This study aimed to identify the benefits of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) by focusing on its role in reducing chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after thoracic surgery., Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Setting: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched to identify studies., Participants: Patients undergoing thoracic surgeries., Intervention: Paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia., Measurement and Main Results: A total of 1,028 adult patients from 10 RCTs were included in the final analysis. The incidence of CPSP at 3 months after surgery was not reduced in the PVB group compared with the no-block (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-1.04; p = 0.07; I 2  = 6.96%) and other-block (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.30-6.42; p = 0.67; I 2  = 77.75%) groups. The PVB did not significantly reduce the incidence of CPSP after 6 months from surgery when compared with no block (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.08-2.53; p = 0.36; I 2  = 87.53%) and other blocks (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.71-1.95; p = 0.93; I 2  = 45.75%). The PVB significantly decreased postoperative pain at 24 and 48 hours at rest compared with the no- block group. The pain score was higher in the PVB group than in the other block groups 48 hours after surgery at rest., Conclusions: Thoracic PVB does not prevent CPSP after thoracic surgery. Further large RCTs are required to confirm and validate the authors' results., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several peripheral regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques are commonly used in thoracic surgery even in the absence of precise indications regarding their effectiveness on postoperative pain management., Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to describe and evaluate the relative effectiveness of different peripheral regional blocks and systemic analgesia in the context of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy., Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses., Data Sources: We searched PubMed and Embase for all RCTs comparing the 24 hour morphine equivalents (MMEs) consumption following peripheral regional blocks and systemic analgesia (SA)., Eligibility Criteria: We selected only RCTs including adult participants undergoing thoracic surgery, including esophagectomy and reporting on postoperative pain outcomes including 24 hour MMEs consumption., Results: Among the 28 randomized studies including adult participants undergoing thoracic surgery and reporting on 24 hour opioid consumption, 11 reporting a comparison of individual blocks with systemic analgesia were meta-analyzed. RA was effective for almost all peripheral blocks. Regarding intercostal block, its antalgic effect was not well evaluated SMD -1.57 (CI -3.88, 0.73). RA in VATS was more effective in reducing MMEs than thoracotomy SMD -1.10 (CI -1.78, -0.41)., Conclusions: RA is a useful choice in thoracic surgery. However, it is still not possible to determine the most appropriate block in the individual surgical settings to be performed due to RCTs paucity.

Purpose: Research has shown that a higher dose of bupivacaine administered in continuous paravertebral block (CPVB) provides a greater analgesic effect after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). In this randomized, controlled, double-blind study, we hypothesized that 0.25% 8 ml/h of levobupivacaine administered in CPVB after VATS provides a greater analgesic effect than 0.125% 8 ml/h., Methods: Fifty patients who underwent unilateral VATS were randomized to receive a postoperative continuous infusion of 0.125% (low group, n = 25) or 0.25% (high group, n = 25) levobupivacaine at 8 mL/h for CPVB. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score during coughing on the morning of postoperative day (POD) 1. The secondary outcomes were the VAS scores at rest and during coughing on POD 2, the number of anesthetized dermatomes, the frequency of rescue analgesics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, and adverse events and complications., Results: There was no significant difference in the VAS score during coughing on the morning of POD 1 between the low and high groups [median, 37.5 (interquartile range 21-50) vs. 40.0 (interquartile range 21-50), respectively; p = 0.79]. Similarly, there were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes between the two groups., Conclusions: Levobupivacaine at 0.25% 8 ml/h in CPVB did not provide better analgesia after VATS over 0.125% 8 ml/h., Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000037930., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.)

This article represents the response to the inquiries adopted by Dr. Raghuraman M Sethuraman, M.D., regarding our recently published study which compared the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus paravertebral block (PVB) regarding postoperative analgesic consumption following breast surgeries (Elewa et al, BMC Anesthesiol 22: 1-9, 2022). We would like to introduce our appreciation and gratitude to the author for his interest in our work, despite being inaccurate in some of his comments., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: PROcedure SPECific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT (PROSPECT) guidelines recommend erector spinae plane (ESP) block or paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, there are few trials comparing the effectiveness of these techniques on patient-centric outcomes, and none evaluating chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Furthermore, there are no available trials comparing ultrasound-guided ESP with surgically placed PVB in this patient cohort., Methods: We conducted a two-centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial, comparing anaesthesiologist-administered, ultrasound-guided ESP catheter with surgeon-administered, video-assisted PVB catheter analgesia among 80 adult patients undergoing VATS. Participants received a 20 ml bolus of levobupivacaine 0.375% followed by infusion of levobupivacaine 0.15% (10-15 ml h -1 ) for 48 h. Primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 score (QoR-15) at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 48 h, peak inspiratory flow (ml s -1 ) at 24 h and 48 h, area under the pain verbal response score vs time curve (AUC), opioid consumption, Comprehensive Complication Index, length of stay, and CPSP at 3 months after surgery., Results: Median (25-75%) QoR-15 at 24 h was higher in ESP (n=37) compared with PVB (n=37): 118 (106-134) vs 110 (89-121) (P=0.03) and at 48 h: 131 (121-139) vs 120 (111-133) (P=0.03). There were no differences in peak inspiratory flow, AUC, Comprehensive Complication Index, length of hospital stay, and opioid consumption. Incidence of CPSP at 3 months was 12 (34%) for ESP and 11 (31%) for PVB (P=0.7)., Conclusions: Compared with video-assisted, surgeon-placed paravertebral catheter, erector spinae catheter improved overall QoR-15 scores at 24 h and 48 h but without differences in pain or opioid consumption after minimally invasive thoracic surgery., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04729712., (Copyright © 2022 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This article (Correspondence) is in response to the recently published study by Elewa et al. in BMC Anesthesiology that compared the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus paravertebral block (PVB) regarding postoperative analgesic consumption following breast surgeries. I greatly appreciate the authors for publishing this study which is one among a very few studies available on this topic. I wish to present my reflections on this article as well as add a few more points on this topic., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Severe acute pain is a significant risk factor for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). The importance of early management in alleviating zoster pain cannot be overstated., Objectives: This study aimed to determine the efficiency and safety of one bolus injection thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESB) in individuals with acute thoracic herpes zoster (HZ) in preventing PHN., Study Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial., Setting: Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Egypt., Methods: Ninety participants over the age of 50 years with chest wall herpetic eruption, lasting shorter than a week along with moderate to severe pain, who got adequate antiviral medication. Patients were chosen at random and classified into 3 equal groups. Group C (control group) did not receive any intervention. Group ESB received US-guided ESB with 25 mg bupivacaine 0.5%, plus 8 mg dexamethasone (10 mL volume). Group PVB received US-guided PVB with 25 mg bupivacaine 0.5%, plus 8 mg dexamethasone (10 mL volume)., Results: Numerical rating scale (NRS) showed insignificant differences at baseline. NRS for pain at 1, 3, 4, 12, and 24 weeks was significantly reduced in group ESB compared to group C and in group PVB than group C and insignificantly different between group ESB and group PVB. Doses of pregabalin and acetaminophen were comparable at 1 week among the studied groups. Doses of pregabalin and acetaminophen at 3, 4, 12, and 24 weeks were significantly lesser in group ESB compared to group C and in group PVB than group C and insignificantly different between group ESB and group PVB. After 3 months, the incidence of persistent herpetic pain was not significantly different between the study groups. After 6 months, the incidence of persistent herpetic pain was statistically significantly lower in groups ESB and PVB than in group C (P = 0.037 and 0.015, respectively) without significant difference between group ESB and group PVB., Limitations: Small sample size, single center study., Conclusions: Both ESB and PVB were effective in controlling acute pain and persistent herpetic pain after 6 months (which was evident by lower NRS for pain and doses of pregabalin and acetaminophen), but ESB is safer (no reported pneumothorax and hypotension).