Search

Background: Prior studies have reported lower effectiveness of XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines against hospitalization related to the Omicron JN.1 variant than the XBB variant. This study evaluated the effectiveness and durability of the BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine against JN.1-related hospitalization during the 2023-2024 season in Europe., Methods: A test-negative case-control study was carried out in adults (≥18 y) hospitalized between 2 October 2023 and 2 April 2024 with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) within the id.DRIVE partnership. This study included nine sites across Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Cases had a laboratory-confirmed JN.1 infection or a positive SARS-CoV-2 test with symptom onset during JN.1 predominance; controls had a negative SARS-CoV-2 test and symptom onset during JN.1 predominance. The primary objective was to estimate BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 hospitalization. One case was matched with up to four controls, according to symptom onset date and site. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for symptom onset date, age, sex, and number of chronic conditions., Findings: Among 308 test-positive cases and 1117 test-negative controls, BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted VE against hospitalization compared to no vaccination this season was 53.8% (95% CI 38.4-65.4) after a median of 63 days following vaccination. Protection was sustained through five months; VE was 52.2% (95% CI 41.3-61.1) 2 to <4 weeks after vaccination, 48.9% (95% CI 17.9-68.2) at 4 to <8 weeks, and ranged from 54.6% to 59.5% at 4-week intervals from 8 to <22 weeks., Interpretation: BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine provided protection against JN.1-related hospitalization, regardless of prior vaccination history, with no evidence of waning through five months. These data support yearly vaccination against COVID-19 to prevent severe illness during the respiratory virus season., Funding: Pfizer., Competing Interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE disclosure form and declare: Pfizer Inc. funded this study. C Marques, HRV, JLN, JMML, JY, MMu, LJ, and SV are employees of Pfizer Inc. HRV, JLN, JMML, JY, MMu, LJ, and SV hold stocks or stock options in Pfizer Inc. EC-S, KB, LD, LdM, MMi, and TMPT are employees of P95 Epidemiology & Pharmacovigilance, a company providing scientific services in the field of vaccines. KB and TMPT declare stock or stock options in P95. KB has received consulting fees from Pfizer Inc. for conducting this study, royalties for the book ‘Vaccination Programmes: epidemiology, monitoring, evaluation’ by Hahné, Bollaerts, Farrington, and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, CureVac, Janssen, GSK, Pfizer, Novavax, Valneva, and the World Health Organization. AOS reports that Pfizer partially funded the hospital network for the collection of data via id.DRIVE. IC reports support from Pfizer for congress attendance. AM-I reports being a co-principal investigator from VAHNSI (Fisabio). Fisabio received funding from P95 via id.DRIVE to conduct the study. BG and GI declare payment from the id.DRIVE Consortium to their institutions for conducting the study. BG further declares that data collaboration between P95 and Pfizer is reported. GI has received grants or contracts, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events, support for attending meetings and/or travel, and declares participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) or Advisory Board from GSK, MSD, Sanofi, Pfizer, Seqirus, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Viatris, and Novavax. GR declares payments to his institution by the CAPNETZ foundation, of whose executive board he is the chairman. Furthermore, GR reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Atriva, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Insmed, MSD, Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer for consultancy during advisory board meetings and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Essex Pharma, Grifols, GSK, Insmed, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Solvay, Takeda, Novartis, Pfizer, and Vertex for lectures. SO-R declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from GSK and Sanofi. AÁ, C Martin, EC-S, GLtK, LdM, LD and MMI declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Organizing pneumonia (OP), an interstitial lung disease, has been observed in patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IDDs) treated with anti-CD20, particularly after COVID-19, but data are limited., Aim: To provide a detailed characterization of COVID-19-associated OP in IDD patients treated with anti-CD20., Methods: Bi-centric retrospective cohort study including patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), aquaporin-4-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4 + NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) who received anti-CD20 and were diagnosed with COVID-19-associated OP between March 2020 and October 2023., Results: Nineteen patients were included (mean age 46.8 years; 52.6% female; 63% rituximab, 37% ocrelizumab). Sixteen had MS, two MOGAD, and one AQP4 + NMOSD. Intermittent fever was the predominant symptom. Hospitalization occurred in all but one patient, without fatalities. Chest CT consistently showed OP patterns. Thirteen patients had positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage. Treatments included corticosteroids, antivirals, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma. Fourteen patients postponed infusions; nine resumed post-recovery (median 11.9 months), two switched due to hypogammaglobulinemia, and three stopped. After a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, lung abnormalities and clinical manifestations resolved in 18 patients; however, 13 experienced long-COVID., Conclusions: In anti-CD20-treated patients with recurrent fever and distinctive CT features, COVID-19-associated OP should be considered., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: R Carvajal is currently being funded by a Research grand from the European Charcot Foundation. In 2023, he received a grant by “Vall d′Hebron Institut de Recerca.” In 2021, he received an ECTRIMS Fellowship training performed during 2021–2022. He has also received speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Merck, and Sanofi.B Rodríguez-Acevedo has received speaking honoraria from Merck and honoraria for consulting services from Novartis.L García-Vasco has received honoraria as a speaker from Merck and Novartis; and received support for attending meetings and congresses from BMS, Horizon, Janssen, Novartis and Sanofi.A Zabalza has a predoctoral grant Rio Hortega, from the Instituto de Salud CarlosIII, Spain (CM22/00237), received travel expenses for scientific meetings from Biogen-Idec, Merck Serono and Novartis; speaking honoraria from Eisai; and a study grant from Novartis.H Ariño has received grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; JR22/00072.L Bollo is supported by a 1-year stipend endowed by the NMSS/AAN John Dystel Prize for Multiple Sclerosis Research awarded to Prof. Xavier Montalban in 2022.N Cabello-Clotet has received support for attending meetings and congresses and honoraria as a speaker from Gilead, GSK Janssen, and MSD.A Cobo-Calvo has received grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; JR19/00007.M Comabella has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Biogen-Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Genzyme, and Novartis.A García-Sarreón is currently an ECTRIMS clinical fellowship awardee for 2023–2024 and receives support from ECTRIMS.S Otero-Romero has received speaking and consulting honoraria from Genzyme, Biogen-Idec, Novartis, Roche, Excemed and MSD; as well as research support from Novartis.A Pappolla has received funding travel from Roche and speaking honoraria from Novartis. He performed an ECTRIMS Clinical Training Fellowship program during 2021, and is currently performing an MSIF-ARSEP Fellowship program.J Rio has received speaking honoraria and personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards from Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck- Serono, Novartis, Teva, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis.P Tagliani has received support during one year as an ECTRIMS clinical fellowship awardee in 2019–2020.C Tur is currently being funded by a Miguel Servet contract, awarded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España (CP23/00117). She has also received a 2020 Junior Leader La Caixa Fellowship (fellowship code: LCF/BQ/PI20/11760008), awarded by “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434), a 2021 Merck’s Award for the Investigation in MS awarded by Fundación Merck Salud (Spain), a 2021 Research Grant (PI21/01860) awarded by the ISCIII, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España, and a FORTALECE research grant (FORT23/00034) also by the ISCIII, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España. In 2015, she received an ECTRIMS Post-doctoral Research Fellowship and has received funding from the UK MS Society. She is a member of the Editorial Board of Neurology Journal and Multiple Sclerosis Journal. She has also received honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Merck, Immunic Therapeutics, and Bristol Myers Squibb. She is a steering committee member of the O’HAND trial and of the Consensus group on Follow-on DMTs.A Vidal-Jordana has received support has received support for contracts Juan Rodes (JR16/00024) and from Fondo de Investigación en Salud (PI17/02162 and PI22/01589) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain, and has engaged in consulting and/or participated as speaker in events organized by Roche, Novartis, and Merck.A Vilaseca has received a Rio Hortega grant (CM22/00247) by Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII).A Villar has engaged in consulting and/or participated as a speaker in events organized by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janssen, and Glaxo, with travel expenses covered by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Glaxo, Chiesi, and Novartis for participation in scientific meetings. In addition, research support has been received from Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline.J Sastre-Garriga serves as co-Editor for Europe on the editorial board of Multiple Sclerosis Journal and as Editor-in-Chief in Revista de Neurología, receives research support from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (19/950) and has served as a consultant/speaker for Biogen, Celgene/Bristol Meyers Squibb, Sanofi, Novartis and Merck.C Oreja-Guevara has received honoraria for speaking and serving on advisory boards from Biogen Idec., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Janssen, BMS, Novartis and Teva.M Tintoré has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria and research support from Almirall, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Viela Bioand Teva Pharmaceuticals. Data Safety Monitoring Board for Parexel and UCB Biopharma, Relapse Adjudication Committee for IMCYSE SA.X Montalban has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for participation in scientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past years with Abbvie, Actelion, Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Hoffmann-La Roche, Immunic, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medday, Merck, Mylan, Nervgen, Novartis, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceutical, TG Therapeutics, Excemed, MSIF and NMSS.G Arrambide has received speaking honoraria and consulting services or participation in advisory boards from Sanofi, Roche and Horizon Therapeutics/Amgen; and travel expenses for scientific meetings from Novartis, Roche, ECTRIMS and EAN.J Castillo, A Falcó-Roget, I Galan, I Gómez-Estévez, G Granados, G Mato-Chain, D La Puma, L Midaglia, A Nieto-García, M Rodríguez, and I Sansano report no disclosures.

Importance: Vaccination in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS) requiring prompt treatment initiation may result in impaired vaccine responses and/or treatment delay., Objective: To assess the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated vaccines administered during natalizumab treatment., Design, Setting, and Participants: This self-controlled, prospective cohort study followed adult patients with MS from 1 study center in Spain from September 2016 to February 2022. Eligible participants included adults with MS who completed immunization for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), and COVID-19 during natalizumab therapy. Data analysis was conducted from November 2022 to February 2023., Exposures: Patients were categorized according to their time receiving natalizumab treatment at the time of vaccine administration as short-term (≤1 year) or long-term (>1 year)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics were collected during the year before vaccination (prevaccination period) and the year after vaccination (postvaccination period). Seroprotection rates and postvaccination immunoglobulin G titers were determined for each vaccine within both periods. Additionally, differences in annualized relapse rate (ARR), new T2 lesions (NT2L), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and John Cunningham virus (JCV) serostatus between the 2 periods were assessed., Results: Sixty patients with MS (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [9.4] years; 44 female [73.3%]; 16 male [26.7%]; mean [SD] disease duration, 17.0 [8.7] years) completed HBV, HAV, and mRNA COVID-19 immunization during natalizumab treatment, with 12 patients in the short-term group and 48 patients in the long-term group. The global seroprotection rate was 93% (95% CI, 86%-98%), with individual vaccine rates of 92% for HAV (95% CI, 73%-99%), 93% for HBV (95% CI, 76%-99%), and 100% for the COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccine (95% CI, 84%-100%). Between the prevaccination and postvaccination periods there was a significant reduction in the mean (SD) ARR (0.28 [0.66] vs 0.01 [0.12]; P = .004) and median (IQR) NT2L (5.00 [2.00-10.00] vs 0.81 [0.00-0.50]; P = .01). No changes in disability accumulation were detected (median [IQR] EDSS score 3.5 [2.0-6.0] vs 3.5 [2.0-6.0]; P = .62). No differences in safety and immunogenicity were observed for all vaccines concerning the duration of natalizumab treatment., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that immunization with inactivated vaccines during natalizumab therapy was both safe and immunogenic, regardless of the treatment duration. Natalizumab may be a valuable option for proper immunization, averting treatment delays in patients with highly active MS; however, this strategy needs to be formally evaluated.

Introduction: Prospective data on the risk of hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) among patients with resolved HBV infection undergoing anti-CD20 antibodies monotherapy is scarce. We aimed to assess the risk of HBVr in patients with resolved HBV infection treated with rituximab or ocrelizumab in monotherapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) without antiviral prophylaxis., Methods: HEBEM is a prospective study that included all consecutive adults HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive who initiated anti-CD20 antibodies for MS or NMOSD at Cemcat. Inclusion criteria encompassed undetectable HBV-DNA, absence of other immunosuppressants or antiviral therapy. Every 6 months HBsAg, ALT and HBV-DNA were performed to rule out HBVr (defined by 2-log increase in HBV-DNA or seroconversion to HBsAg+)., Results: From August/2019 to August/2022, 540 subjects initiated anti-CD20 antibodies, 28 (5.2%) were anti-HBc-positive and were included. Twenty-two received rituximab and 6 ocrelizumab. The majority (89.3%) had previously received ≥ 1 immunomodulatory drug, with corticosteroids (82.1%) and interferon (42.9%) as the most common. At inclusion, all presented normal transaminases and undetectable HBV-DNA. Median anti-HBs levels were 105.5 mIU/mL (IQR 0-609). Median follow-up was 3.1 years (2.1-4.0). Median number of cycles of anti-CD20 antibodies was 6 (3-7), with a cumulative dose of 8.5 g (5.8-11.2) of rituximab and 3 g (1.8-3.8) of ocrelizumab. Neither cases of HBVr nor changes in anti-HBs titers were observed per 83.6 patient-years treated with monotherapy with anti-CD20 antibodies., Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with MS or NMOSD and resolved HBV infection, anti-CD20 monotherapy was not associated with detectable risk of HBV reactivation despite the lack of antiviral prophylaxis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Mumps-Measles-Rubella (MMR) and Varicella zoster vaccines (VAR) are live attenuated vaccines, usually administered in a two-dose scheme at least 4 weeks apart. However, single-dose immunization schemes may also be effective and can reduce delays in immunosuppressive treatment initiation in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) who need to be immunized., Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity of a single-dose attempt (SDA) versus the standard immunization scheme (SIS) with VAR and/or MMR in pwMS., Methods: Retrospective observational study in pwMS vaccinated against VAR and/or MMR. We compared seroprotection rates and antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) between the two strategies., Results: Ninety-six patients were included. Thirty-one patients received VAR and 67 MMR. In the SDA group, the seroprotection rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 53.3-78.3) versus 97.2% (95% CI: 85.5-99.9) in the SIS ( p  < 0.001). For the seroprotected patients, GMTs were similar for both schemes., Conclusion: An SDA of VAR and/or MMR vaccines could be sufficient to protect almost two-thirds of patients. Testing immunogenicity after a single dose of VZ and/or MMR could be included in routine clinical practice to achieve rapid immunization., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: R. Carvajal is currently being funded by ‘Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca’ grand, this project was supported by ECTRIMS Fellowship training performed during 2021–2022, he has also received speaking honoraria and personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards and from Roche, Novartis, BIIB-Colombia, Merck, and Sanofi. C. Tur is currently being funded by a Junior Leader La Caixa Fellowship (fellowship code is LCF/BQ/PI20/11760008), awarded by ‘la Caixa’ Foundation (ID 100010434), she has also received the 2021 Merck’s Award for the Investigation in MS, awarded by Fundación Merck Salud (Spain) and a grant awarded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España (PI21/01860); in 2015, she received an ECTRIMS Post-doctoral Research Fellowship and has received funding from the UK MS Society, she is a member of the Editorial Board of Neurology and Multiple Sclerosis Journal, she has also received honoraria from Roche and Novartis and is a steering committee member of the O’HAND trial and of the Consensus group. X. Martínez-Gómez has received research support fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Statens Serum Institut & Janssen Vaccine, as well as travel expenses fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi Pasteur MS. L. Bollo is supported by a 1-year stipend endowed by the NMSS/AAN John Dystel Prize for Multiple Sclerosis Research awarded to Prof. Xavier Montalban in 2022. J. Esperalba reports no disclosures. M. Rodríguez reports no disclosures. A. Pappolla has received funding travel from Roche and speaking honoraria from Novartis. He developed this project during a 2021 ECTRIMS Clinical Training Fellowship programme, and is currently performing an MSIF-ARSEP Fellowship programme. A. Cobo-Calvo has received a grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; JR19/00007. P. Carbonell yearly salary is supported by a grant from Biogen to Fundació privada Cemcat for statistical analysis. B. Borras-Bermejo has received travel expenses for scientific meetings from GlaxoSmithKline J. Rio has received speaking honoraria and personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards from Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis. J. Castilló reports no disclosures. N. Braga has received travel expenses for scientific meetings and speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Merck and was funded by ECTRIMS Fellowship in 2022–2023. N. Mongay-Ochoa has a predoctoral grant Rio Hortega, from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CM21/00018), she also has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses from Merck and Roche. J.A. Rodigo-Pendás has received research support fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Statens Serum Institut, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. and Spanish Clinical Research Network—SCReN and travel expenses fees from Sanofi Pasteur MSD. A. Vidal-Jordana has engaged in consulting and/or participated as speaker in events organized by Roche, Novartis, Merck, and Sanofi. G. Arrambide has received speaking honoraria and consulting services or participation in advisory boards from Sanofi, Merck, Roche, and Horizon Therapeutics; travel expenses for scientific meetings from Novartis, Roche, and ECTRIMS. I. Galán reports no disclosures. B. Rodríguez-Acevedo has received speaking honoraria from Merck and honoraria for consulting services from Novartis. A. Zabalza has a predoctoral grant Rio Hortega, from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (CM22/00237), received travel expenses for scientific meetings from Biogen-Idec, Merck Serono and Novartis, speaking honoraria from Eisai and a study grant from Novartis. L. Midaglia reports no disclosures. M. Comabella has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Biogen-Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Genzyme, and Novartis. J. Sastre-Garriga serves as co-Editor for Europe on the editorial board of Multiple Sclerosis Journal and as Editor-in-Chief in Revista de Neurología, receives research support from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (19/950) and has served as a consultant/speaker for Biogen, Celgene/Bristol Meyers Squibb, Sanofi, Novartis and Merck. X. Montalbán has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for participation in scientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past years with Abbvie, Actelion, Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Hoffmann-La Roche, Immunic, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medday, Merck, Mylan, Nervgen, Novartis, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceutical, TG Therapeutics, Excemed, MSIF, and NMSS. M. Tintore has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria and research support from Almirall, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Viela Bio and Teva Pharmaceuticals. Data Safety Monitoring Board for Parexel and UCB Biopharma. S. Otero-Romero has received speaking and consulting honoraria from Genzyme, Biogen-Idec, Novartis, Roche, Excemed, and MSD; as well as research support from Novartis.

Background and Objectives: Early treatment is associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with a first demyelinating event and early multiple sclerosis (MS). However, magnetic resonance (MR) findings are not usually integrated to construct propensity scores (PSs) when evaluating outcomes. We assessed the association of receiving very early treatment with the risk of long-term disability including an MR score (MRS) in patients with a first demyelinating event., Methods: We included 580 patients with a first demyelinating event prospectively collected between 1994 and 2021, who received at least 1 disease-modifying drug (DMD). Patients were classified into tertiles according to the cohort's distribution of the time from the first demyelinating event to the first DMD: first tertile (FT) or very early treatment (6 months; n = 194), second tertile (6.1-16 months, n = 192), and third tertile (TT) (16.1 months, n = 194). A 5-point MRS was built according to the sum of the following indicators: ≥9 brain lesions (1 point); ≥1 infratentorial lesion (1 point); ≥1 spinal cord (SC) lesion (1 point); ≥1 contrast-enhancing (CE) brain lesion (1 point); and ≥1 CE SC lesion (1 point). PS based on covariates and the MRS was computed for each of the outcomes. Inverse PS-weighted Cox and linear regression models assessed the risk of different outcomes between tertile groups. Finally, to confirm the role of MR in treatment decision, we studied the time elapsed from the first demyelinating event to treatment initiation according to the MRS in all patients with radiologic available information, renamed as raw-MRS., Results: Very early treatment decreased the risk of reaching Expanded Disability Status Scale 3.0 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.97), secondary progressive MS (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.85), and sustained disease progression at 12 months after treatment initiation (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.84), when compared with patients from the TT group. Patients from the FT group had a lower disability progression rate (β estimate -0.009, 95% CI -0.016 to -0.002) and a lower severe disability measured by the Patient-Determined Disease Step (β estimate -0.52, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.13) than the TT group. Finally, there was a 62.4% reduction in the median time between the first demyelinating event and the first-ever treatment initiation from patients displaying a raw-MRS 1 to patients with a raw-MRS 5., Discussion: Using PS models with and without MRS, we showed that treatment initiation at very early stages is associated with a reduction in the risk of long-term disability accrual in patients with a first demyelinating event., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that earlier treatment of patients with MS presenting with a first demyelinating event is associated with improved clinical outcomes., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Vaccination is considered the most effective measure for preventing influenza and its complications. The influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) varies annually due to the evolution of influenza viruses and the update of vaccine composition. Assessing the IVE is crucial to facilitate decision making in public health policies., Aim: to estimate the IVE against hospitalization and its determinants in the 2021/22 season in a Spanish tertiary hospital., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational test-negative design study within the Development of Robust and Innovative Vaccine Effectiveness (DRIVE) project. Hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) and an available influenza reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were selected and classified as cases (positive influenza RT-PCR) or controls (negative influenza RT-PCR). Vaccine information was obtained from electronic clinical records shared by public healthcare providers. Information about potential confounders was obtained from hospital clinical registries. The IVE was calculated by subtracting the ratio of the odds of vaccination in cases and controls from one, as a percentage (IVE = (1 - odds ratio (OR)) × 100). Multivariate IVE estimates were calculated using logistic regression., Results: In total, 260 severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) were identified, of which 34 were positive for influenza, and all were subtype A(H3N2). Fifty-three percent were vaccinated. Adjusted IVE against hospitalization was 26.4% (95% CI -69% to 112%). IVE determinants could not be explored due to sample size limitations., Conclusion: Our data revealed non-significant moderate vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization for the 2021/2022 season.

Background and Purpose: With the new highly active drugs available for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), vaccination becomes an essential part of the risk management strategy. We aimed to develop a European evidence-based consensus for the vaccination strategy of pwMS who are candidates for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs)., Methods: This work was conducted by a multidisciplinary working group using formal consensus methodology. Clinical questions (defined as population, interventions and outcomes) considered all authorized DMTs and vaccines. A systematic literature search was conducted and quality of evidence was defined according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The recommendations were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance., Results: Seven questions, encompassing vaccine safety, vaccine effectiveness, global vaccination strategy and vaccination in subpopulations (pediatric, pregnant women, elderly and international travelers) were considered. A narrative description of the evidence considering published studies, guidelines and position statements is presented. A total of 53 recommendations were agreed by the working group after three rounds of consensus., Conclusion: This first European consensus on vaccination in pwMS proposes the best vaccination strategy according to current evidence and expert knowledge, with the goal of homogenizing the immunization practices in pwMS., (© 2023 The Authors. Co-published by European Academy of Neurology and European Committee of Treatment of Research in Multiple Sclerosis.)

Background: With the new highly active drugs available for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), vaccination becomes an essential part of the risk management strategy., Objective: To develop a European evidence-based consensus for the vaccination strategy of pwMS who are candidates for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs)., Methods: This work was conducted by a multidisciplinary working group using formal consensus methodology. Clinical questions (defined as population, interventions, and outcomes) considered all authorized DMTs and vaccines. A systematic literature search was conducted and quality of evidence was defined according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The recommendations were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance., Results: Seven questions, encompassing vaccine safety, vaccine effectiveness, global vaccination strategy and vaccination in sub-populations (pediatric, pregnant women, elderly and international travelers) were considered. A narrative description of the evidence considering published studies, guidelines, and position statements is presented. A total of 53 recommendations were agreed by the working group after three rounds of consensus., Conclusion: This first European consensus on vaccination in pwMS proposes the best vaccination strategy according to current evidence and expert knowledge, with the goal of homogenizing the immunization practices in pwMS.

Background: Vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies with long-term follow-up are needed to understand durability of protection against severe COVID-19 outcomes conferred by primary-series vaccination in individuals not receiving boosters. COVIDRIVE is a European public-private partnership evaluating brand-specific vaccine effectiveness (VE). We report a prespecified interim analysis of primary-series AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) VE., Methods: Seven Study Contributors in Europe collected data on individuals aged ≥18 years who were hospitalised with severe acute respiratory infection (June 1st, 2021-September 5th, 2022) and eligible for COVID-19 vaccination prior to hospitalisation. In this test-negative case-control study, individuals were defined as test-positive cases or test-negative controls (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) and were either fully vaccinated (two AZD1222 doses, 4-12 weeks apart, completed ≥14 days prior to symptom onset; no booster doses) or unvaccinated (no COVID-19 vaccine prior to hospitalisation). The primary objective was to estimate AZD1222 VE against COVID-19 hospitalisation. A literature review and meta-regression were conducted to contextualise findings on durability of protection., Findings: 761 individuals were included during the 15-month analysis period. Overall AZD1222 VE estimate was 72.8% (95% CI, 53.4-84.1). VE was 93.8% (48.6-99.3) in participants who received second AZD1222 doses ≤8 weeks prior to hospitalisation, with spline-based VE estimates demonstrating protection (VE ≥ 50%) 30 weeks post-second dose. Meta-regression analysis (data from seven publications) showed consistent results, with ≥80% protection against COVID-19 hospitalisation through ∼43 weeks post-second dose, with some degree of waning., Interpretation: Primary-series AZD1222 vaccination confers protection against COVID-19 hospitalisation with enduring levels of VE through ≥6 months., Funding: AstraZeneca., Competing Interests: WM, CMG, MO, and ST declare employment by AstraZeneca and ownership of AstraZeneca stocks/shares. LdM, AD, CW-T, WH-M, LD, GR, ALS, TYCN, and KB declare employment by P95. ALS and TYCN were contracted to AstraZeneca at the time of this work. P95 received consulting fees from several COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, including AstraZeneca, for the COVIDRIVE study. AC declares funding from COVIDRIVE industry partners (AstraZeneca, Janssen, Moderna, Novavax, CureVac, Sanofi, Valneva, GlaxoSmithKline, Bavarian Nordic) for the COVIDRIVE consortium, of which FISABIO is the coordinator, and honoraria for lectures and educational events from GlaxoSmithKline and for presentations from MSD and HIPRA. GM declares no conflicts of interest related to this analysis, and honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline associated with herpes virus vaccine. AM-I declares funding from COVIDRIVE industry partners (AstraZeneca, Janssen, Moderna, Novavax, CureVac, Sanofi, Valneva, GlaxoSmithKline, Bavarian Nordic) for the COVIDRIVE consortium, of which FISABIO is the coordinator, and honoraria for educational events from MSD and for presentations from Sanofi Pasteur. GI declares no conflicts of interest. SO-R declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from EXCEMED and Sanofi. SB declares speaker honorarium from GlaxoSmithKline. CM declares advisory board participation for AstraZeneca in 2021., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Importance: Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is the main event responsible for irreversible disability accumulation in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To investigate clinical and neuroimaging predictors of PIRA at the time of the first demyelinating attack and factors associated with long-term clinical outcomes of people who present with PIRA., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study, conducted from January 1, 1994, to July 31, 2021, included patients with a first demyelinating attack from multiple sclerosis; patients were recruited from 1 study center in Spain. Patients were excluded if they refused to participate, had alternative diagnoses, did not meet protocol requirements, had inconsistent demographic information, or had less than 3 clinical assessments., Exposures: Exposures included (1) clinical and neuroimaging features at the first demyelinating attack and (2) presenting PIRA, ie, confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) in a free-relapse period at any time after symptom onset, within (vs after) the first 5 years of the disease (ie, early/late PIRA), and in the presence (vs absence) of new T2 lesions in the previous 2 years (ie, active/nonactive PIRA)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) yearly increase rates since the first attack and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for predictors of time to PIRA and time to EDSS 6.0., Results: Of the 1128 patients (mean [SD] age, 32.1 [8.3] years; 781 female individuals [69.2%]) included in the study, 277 (25%) developed 1 or more PIRA events at a median (IQR) follow-up time of 7.2 (4.6-12.4) years (for first PIRA). Of all patients with PIRA, 86 of 277 (31%) developed early PIRA, and 73 of 144 (51%) developed active PIRA. Patients with PIRA were slightly older, had more brain lesions, and were more likely to have oligoclonal bands than those without PIRA. Older age at the first attack was the only predictor of PIRA (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.23-1.65; P < .001 for each older decade). Patients with PIRA had steeper EDSS yearly increase rates (0.18; 95% CI, 0.16-0.20 vs 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02-0.05; P < .001) and an 8-fold greater risk of reaching EDSS 6.0 (HR, 7.93; 95% CI, 2.25-27.96; P = .001) than those without PIRA. Early PIRA had steeper EDSS yearly increase rates than late PIRA (0.31; 95% CI, 0.26-0.35 vs 0.13; 95% CI, 0.10-0.16; P < .001) and a 26-fold greater risk of reaching EDSS 6.0 from the first attack (HR, 26.21; 95% CI, 2.26-303.95; P = .009)., Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that for patients with multiple sclerosis, presenting with PIRA after a first demyelinating event was not uncommon and suggests an unfavorable long-term prognosis, especially if it occurs early in the disease course.

Intrathecal production of kappa free light chains occurs in multiple sclerosis and can be measured using the kappa free light chain index. Kappa free light chain index values can be determined more easily than oligoclonal bands detection and seem more sensitive than the immunoglobulin (Ig)G index to diagnose multiple sclerosis. We assessed the value of oligoclonal bands, kappa free light chain index cut-offs 5.9, 6.6 and 10.61, and IgG index to diagnose multiple sclerosis with prospectively acquired data from a clinically isolated syndrome inception cohort. We selected patients with sufficient data to determine oligoclonal bands positivity, MRI dissemination in space and time, IgG index and sufficient quantities of paired CSF and blood samples to determine kappa free light chain indexes (n = 214). We used Kendall's Tau coefficient to estimate concordance, calculated the number of additional diagnoses when adding each positive index to dissemination in space and positive oligoclonal bands, performed survival analyses for oligoclonal bands and each index with the outcomes second attack and 2017 MRI dissemination in space and time and estimated the diagnostic properties of oligoclonal bands and the different indexes for the previously mentioned outcomes at 5 years. Oligoclonal bands were positive in 138 patients (64.5%), kappa free light chain-5.9 in 136 (63.6%), kappa free light chain-6.6 in 135 (63.1%), kappa free light chain-10.61 in 126 (58.9%) and IgG index in 101 (47.2%). The highest concordance was between oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chain-6.6 (τ = 0.727) followed by oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chain-5.9 (τ = 0.716). Combining dissemination in space plus oligoclonal bands or kappa free light chain-5.9 increased the number of diagnosed patients by 11 (5.1%), with kappa free light chain-6.6 by 10 (4.7%), with kappa free light chain-10.61 by 9 (4.2%) and with IgG index by 3 (1.4%). Patients with positive oligoclonal bands or indexes reached second attack and MRI dissemination in space and time faster than patients with negative results (P < 0.0001 except IgG index in second attack: P = 0.016). In multivariable Cox models [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)], the risk for second attack was very similar between kappa free light chain-5.9 [2.0 (0.9-4.3), P = 0.068] and kappa free light chain-6.6 [2.1 (1.1-4.2), P = 0.035]. The highest risk for MRI dissemination in space and time was demonstrated with kappa free light chain-5.9 [4.9 (2.5-9.6), P < 0.0001], followed by kappa free light chain-6.6 [3.4 (1.9-6.3), P < 0.0001]. Kappa free light chains-5.9 and -6.6 had a slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than oligoclonal bands for second attack (70.5, 71.1 and 67.8) and MRI dissemination in space and time (85.7, 85.1 and 81.0). Kappa free light chain indexes 5.9 and 6.6 performed slightly better than oligoclonal bands to assess multiple sclerosis risk and in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Given the concordance between oligoclonal bands and these indexes, we suggest using dissemination in space plus positive oligoclonal bands or positive kappa free light chain index as a modified criterion to diagnose multiple sclerosis., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: The recommendation for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy was established in Catalonia in February 2014. The objective of this study was to compare the hospitalisation rate for pertussis in children under one year of age before and after the implementation of the vaccination programme., Methods: Observational and retrospective study of patients under one year of age admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of pertussis. The hospitalisation rate of patients under one year of age of the period prior to the vaccination programme (2008-2013) was compared with the period with vaccination programme (2014-2019) in the total of children under one year of age and in 2 subgroups: children under 3 months and between 3-11 months., Results: Hospitalization rate was significantly lower in the period with vaccination programme in children under one year of age and specifically in children under 3 months (2.43 vs. 4.72 per 1000 person-years and 6.47 vs. 13.11 per 1000 person-years, respectively). The rate ratios were: 0.51 (95% CI 0.36-0.73) for children under one year of age; 0.49 (95% CI 0.32-0.75) for those younger than 3 months and 0.56 (95% CI 0.30-1.03) for those with 3-11 months. No statistically significant differences were observed in the clinical severity between both periods., Conclusion: The introduction of the pertussis vaccination programme in pregnancy was associated with a global lower hospitalisation rate for pertussis in children under one year of age and specifically in those under 3 months of age., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Introduction: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective drug approved by the European Medicines Agency as a disease-modifying drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis., Objective: A consensus document was drafted on the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice in Spain., Development: A group of multiple sclerosis specialists reviewed articles addressing treatment with alemtuzumab in patients with multiple sclerosis and published before December 2017. The included studies assessed the drug's efficacy, effectiveness, and safety; screening for infections and vaccination; and administration and monitoring aspects. The initial proposed recommendations were developed by a coordinating group and based on the available evidence and their clinical experience. The consensus process was carried out in 2 stages, with the initial threshold percentage for group agreement established at 80%. The final document with all the recommendations agreed by the working group was submitted for external review and the comments received were considered by the coordinating group., Conclusion: The present document is intended to be used as a tool for optimising the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Over the recent years, the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has evolved very rapidly and a large number of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are now available. However, most DMTs are associated with adverse events, the most frequent of which being infections. Consideration of all DMT-associated risks facilitates development of risk mitigation strategies. An international focused workshop with expert-led discussions was sponsored by the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and was held in April 2021 to review our current knowledge about the risk of infections associated with the use of DMTs for people with MS and NMOSD and corresponding risk mitigation strategies. The workshop addressed DMT-associated infections in specific populations, such as children and pregnant women with MS, or people with MS who have other comorbidities or live in regions with an exceptionally high infection burden. Finally, we reviewed the topic of DMT-associated infectious risks in the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Herein, we summarize available evidence and identify gaps in knowledge which justify further research.

Background: The effect of disease-modifying therapies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine response is unclear., Objectives: We aim to determine the immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 in multiple sclerosis (MS) and anti-CD20-treated patients with other autoimmune diseases (AID)., Methods: Humoral and cellular responses we determined before and 30-90 days after vaccination in patients with MS and anti-CD20-treated patients with other AID in two Catalan centers., Results: 457 patients were enrolled. Findings showed that humoral response decreased under anti-CD20s or sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRM) and with longer treatment duration and increased after 4.5 months from the last anti-CD20 infusion. Cellular response decreased in S1PRM-treated. Patients on anti-CD20 can present cellular responses even in the absence of antibodies., Conclusion: Anti-CD20s and S1PRM modify the immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Objective: To evaluate whether oral contraceptive (OC) use is associated with the risk of a second attack and disability accrual in women with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and early multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: Reproductive information from women included in the Barcelona CIS prospective cohort was collected through a self-reported cross-sectional survey. We examined the relationship of OC exposure with the risk of a second attack and confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale of 3.0 using multivariate Cox regression models, adjusted by age, topography of CIS, oligoclonal bands, baseline brain T2 lesions, body size at menarche, smoking, and disease-modifying treatment (DMT). OC and DMT exposures were considered as time-varying variables. Findings were confirmed with sensitivity analyses using propensity score models., Results: A total of 495 women were included, 389 (78.6%) referred to ever use OC and 341 (68.9%) started OC before the CIS. Exposure to OC was not associated with a second attack (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.33-1.61) or disability accrual (aHR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.17-3.76). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results., Conclusion: OC use does not modify the risk of second attack or disability accrual in patients with CIS and early MS, once considered as a time-dependent exposure and adjusted by other potential confounders.

Background: Global pandemic SARS-CoV-2 causes a prothrombotic state without fully elucidated effects. This study aims to analyse and quantify the possible retinal microvascular abnormalities., Materials and Methods: Case-control study. Patients between 18 and 55 years old with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within the last 3 months were included., Risk Stratification: group 1-mild disease (asymptomatic/paucisymptomatic); group 2-moderate disease (required hospital admission with no acute respiratory distress) and group 3-severe disease (subjects who developed an acute respiratory distress were admitted in the intensive care unit and presented interleukin 6 values above 40 pg/mL). Age-matched volunteers with negative serology tests were enrolled to control group. A colour photograph, an optical coherence tomography (OCT) and an angiography using OCT centred on the fovea were performed., Results: Control group included 27 subjects: group 1 included 24 patients, group 2 consisted of 24 patients and 21 participants were recruited for group 3. There were no funduscopic lesions, neither in the colour images nor in the structural OCT. Fovea-centred vascular density (VD) was reduced in group 2 and group 3 compared with group 1 and control group (control group vs group 2; 16.92 vs 13.37; p=0.009) (control group vs group 3; 16.92 vs .13.63; p=0.026) (group 1 vs group 2; 17.16 vs 13.37; p=0.006) (group 1 vs group 3; 17.16 vs 13.63 p=0.017)., Conclusion: Patients with moderate and severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia had decreased central retinal VD as compared with that of asymptomatic/paucisymptomatic cases or control subjects., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the effect of menopause on disability accumulation in women followed from their clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)., Methods: We examined the longitudinal changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores from CIS until the last follow-up in women belonging to the Barcelona CIS prospective cohort, followed through their menopausal transition. The analysis is based on 13,718 EDSS measurements, with an average of 28 EDSS measurements per patient. Differences in EDSS trajectories between menopausal and nonmenopausal women, controlling for age and disease duration, were evaluated. We performed two sensitivity analyses in women with confirmed MS and in those experiencing early menopause., Results: From 764 eligible women, 496 (65%) responded to the questionnaire, and 74 (14.9%) reached menopause over the follow-up. We did not find a significant inflection point in EDSS trajectories around menopause (slope change -0.009; 95% CI -0.066; 0.046). The annual increase in EDSS over the complete course of the disease was significantly higher in menopausal women (0.049; 95% CI, 0.026-0.074) versus nonmenopausal (0.019; 95% CI, 0.008-0.031; interaction p value 0.025). This difference was lost when controlling for age and disease duration (EDSS annual increase of 0.059; 95% CI, 0.025-0.094 vs. 0.038; 95% CI, 0.021-0.057, respectively; interaction p value 0.321). No inflection point was detected when the analysis was restricted to women with confirmed MS or with earlier menopause., Conclusions: Menopause is not associated with an increased risk of disability in a CIS population, considering EDSS trajectories throughout the course of the disease together with age and disease duration., (© 2021 European Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on (1) number of clinical visits, (2) magnetic resonance (MR) scans, and (3) treatment prescriptions in a multiple sclerosis (MS) referral centre., Methods: Retrospective study covering January 2018 to May 2021., Results: The monthly mean (standard deviation [SD]) of visits performed in 2020 (814[137.6]) was similar to 2018 (741[99.7]; p = 0.153), and 2019 (797[116.3]; p = 0.747). During the COVID-19 period (2020 year), 36.3% of the activity was performed through telemedicine. The number of MR scans performed dropped by 76.6% during the "first wave" (March 14 to June 21, 2020) compared to the mean monthly activity in 2020 (183.5[68.9]), with a recovery during the subsequent two months. The monthly mean of treatment prescriptions approved in 2020 (24.1[7.0]) was lower than in 2019 (30[7.0]; p = 0.049), but similar to 2018 (23.8[8.0]; p = 0.727). Natalizumab prescriptions increased in the "first wave" and onwards, whereas anti-CD20 prescriptions decreased during the COVID-19 period., Conclusion: Maintenance of the number of clinical visits was likely due to telemedicine adoption. Although the number of MR dramatically dropped during the "first wave", an early recovery was observed. Treatment prescriptions suffered a slight quantitative decrease during 2020, whereas substantial qualitative changes were found in specific treatments., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background and Objectives: Information about humoral and cellular responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and antibody persistence in convalescent (COVID-19) patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is scarce. The objectives of this study were to investigate factors influencing humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 and its persistence in convalescent COVID-19 PwMS., Methods: This is a retrospective study of confirmed COVID-19 convalescent PwMS identified between February 2020 and May 2021 by SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. We examined relationships between demographics, MS characteristics, disease-modifying therapy (DMT), and humoral (immunoglobulin G against spike and nucleocapsid proteins) and cellular (interferon-gamma [IFN-γ]) responses to SARS-CoV-2., Results: A total of 121 (83.45%) of 145 PwMS were seropositive, and 25/42 (59.5%) presented a cellular response up to 13.1 months after COVID-19. Anti-CD20-treated patients had lower antibody titers than those under other DMTs ( p < 0.001), but severe COVID-19 and a longer time from last infusion increased the likelihood of producing a humoral response. IFN-γ levels did not differ among DMT. Five of 7 (71.4%) anti--CD20-treated seronegative patients had a cellular response. The humoral response persisted for more than 6 months in 41/56(81.13%) PwMS. In multivariate analysis, seropositivity decreased due to anti-CD20 therapy (OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01-0.55]) and increased in males (OR 3.59 [1.02-12.68]), whereas the cellular response decreased in those with progressive disease (OR 0.04 [0.001-0.88]). No factors were associated with antibody persistence., Discussion: Humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 are present in COVID-19 convalescent PwMS up to 13.10 months after COVID-19. The humoral response decreases under anti-CD20 treatment, although the cellular response can be detected in anti-CD20-treated patients, even in the absence of antibodies., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: This study aims to analyse the possible recovery or worsening in retinal microvasculature after 8 months in a previously studied COVID-19 cohort., Methods and Analysis: A cross-sectional case-control study and a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Participants were the subjects of our previous study who re-enrolled for a new examination including a fundus photograph (retinography), an optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan and an OCT angiography. COVID-19 diagnosed patients were divided into three groups: group 1: mild disease, asymptomatic/paucisymptomatic subjects who received outpatient care; group 2: moderate disease and group 3: severe disease, both of which required hospital admission because of pneumonia. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (V.23.0). Cross-sectional intergroup differences were analysed by means of analysis of variance for normally distributed variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed ones. In reference to the prospective part of the study (intragroup differences, baseline with 8-month comparison), a paired t-test was used for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon signed ranks sum for non-normally distributed data., Results: The fovea-centered superficial and deep vascular densities were significantly diminished in severe cases compared with mild cases (p=0.004; p=0.003, respectively, for superficial and deep) and to controls (p=0.014; p=0.010), also in moderate cases to mild group (p=0.004; p=0.003) and to controls (p=0.012; p=0.024). In the longitudinal study, no significant statistical differences were found between baseline and 8-month follow-up vessel density values., Conclusion: We demonstrated persistent reduction in the central vascular area over time in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: Different treatment response scoring systems in treated MS patients exist. The objective was to assess the long-term predictive value of these systems in RRMS patients treated with self-injectable DMTs., Methods: RRMS-treated patients underwent brain MRI before the onset of therapy and 12 months thereafter, and neurological assessments every 6 months. Clinical and demographic characteristics were collected at baseline. After the first year of treatment, several scoring systems [Rio score (RS), modified Rio score (MRS), MAGNIMS score (MS), and ROAD score (RoS)] were calculated. Cox-Regression and survival analyses were performed to identify scores predicting long-term disability., Results: We included 319 RRMS patients. Survival analyses showed that patients with RS > 1 and RoS > 3 had a significant risk of reaching an EDSS of 4.0 and 6.0 The score with the best sensitivity (61%) was the RoS, while the MRS showed the best specificity (88%). The RS showed the best positive predictive value (42%) and the best accuracy (81%)., Conclusions: The combined measures integrated into different scores have an acceptable prognostic value for identifying patients with long-term disability. Thus, these data reinforce the concept of early treatment optimization to minimize the risk of long-term disability., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The aim of this study was to assess adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines, comparing the BNT162b2 or the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines and the presence and seriousness of a previous COVID-19 infection. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of vaccinated healthcare workers at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona (Spain). Thirty-eight percent of vaccine recipients responded to the questionnaire. We compared the prevalence of adverse reactions by vaccine type and history of COVID-19 infections. A total of 2373 respondents had received the BNT162b2 vaccine, and 506 the mRNA-1273 vaccine. The prevalence of at least one adverse reaction with doses 1 and 2 was 41% and 70%, respectively, in the BNT162b2 group, and 60% and 92% in the mRNA-1273 group ( p < 0.001). The BNT162b2 group reported less prevalence of all adverse reactions. Need for medical leave was significantly more frequent among the mRNA-1273 group (12% versus 4.6% p < 0.001). Interestingly, respondents with a history of allergies or chronic illnesses did not report more adverse reactions. The frequency of adverse reactions with dose 2 was 96% (95% CI 88-100%) for those with a history of COVID-19 related hospitalization, and 86% (95% CI 83-89%) for those with mild or moderate symptomatic COVID-19, significantly higher than for participants with no history of COVID-19 infections (67%, 95% CI 65-69%). Our results could help inform vaccine recipients of the probability of their having adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.

Background and Purpose: Comorbidities are common in multiple sclerosis (MS), and have been associated with worse outcomes and increased health care resource usage. We studied the frequency of comorbidities and adverse health behaviors (AHBs) in MS patients in the Mediterranean region of Catalonia., Methods: This population-based, case-control study used primary health care information covering 80% of Catalonia's population. Cases were matched by age/sex with randomly chosen controls (ratio = 1:5). Demographic information, comorbidities, AHBs, annual visits, sick leave days, and medication dispensing were studied. The association of comorbidities with MS and the profile of comorbidities according to sex within MS cases were assessed with multivariate logistic regression models, after adjusting for confounding variables. Health care resource usage was analyzed in MS cases compared to controls, and within MS cases in those with compared to those without comorbidities., Results: Five thousand five hundred forty-eight MS cases and 27,710 controls (70% female, mean age = 48.3 years) were included. Stroke (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-1.99), epilepsy (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.94-3.10), bipolar disorder (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.17-2.36), and depression (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.70-1.98) were more frequent in MS. Cases were more prone to smoking but less to alcohol intake. Among cases, psychiatric comorbidities were more frequent in women, whereas cardiovascular diseases and AHBs were more frequent in men. MS patients, particularly with comorbidities, had higher health care resource usage than controls., Conclusions: Psychiatric comorbidities, stroke, epilepsy, and AHBs are more common in MS patients than in the general population in the western Mediterranean region of Catalonia. The presence of comorbidities increases the health care resource usage in MS patients., (© 2021 European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objectives: To explore whether time to diagnosis, time to treatment initiation, and age to reach disability milestones have changed in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) according to different multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria periods., Methods: This retrospective study was based on data collected prospectively from the Barcelona-CIS cohort between 1994 and 2020. Patients were classified into 5 periods according to different MS criteria, and the times to MS diagnosis and treatment initiation were evaluated. The age at which patients with MS reached an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥3.0 was assessed by Cox regression analysis according to diagnostic criteria periods. Last, to remove the classic Will Rogers phenomenon by which the use of different MS criteria over time might result in a changes of prognosis, the 2017 McDonald criteria were applied, and age at EDSS score ≥3.0 was assessed by Cox regression., Results: In total, 1,174 patients were included. The median time from CIS to MS diagnosis and from CIS to treatment initiation showed a 77% and 82% reduction from the Poser to the McDonald 2017 diagnostic criteria periods, respectively. Patients of a given age diagnosed in more recent diagnostic criteria periods had a lower risk of reaching an EDSS score ≥3.0 than patients of the same age diagnosed in earlier diagnostic periods (reference category Poser period): adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0.90) for McDonald 2001, aHR 0.25 (0.12-0.54) for McDonald 2005, aHR 0.30 (0.12-0.75) for McDonald 2010, and aHR 0.07 (0.01-0.45) for McDonald 2017. Patients in the early-treatment group displayed an aHR of 0.53 (0.33-0.85) of reaching age at EDSS score ≥3.0 compared to those in the late-treatment group. Changes in prognosis together with early-treatment effect were maintained after the exclusion of possible bias derived from the use of different diagnostic criteria over time (Will Rogers phenomenon)., Discussion: A continuous decrease in the time to MS diagnosis and treatment initiation was observed across diagnostic criteria periods. Overall, patients diagnosed in more recent diagnostic criteria periods displayed a lower risk of reaching disability. The prognostic improvement is maintained after the Will Rogers phenomenon is discarded, and early treatment appears to be the most likely contributing factor., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Information regarding multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is scarce. The study objective was to describe the incidence and characteristics of MS patients with COVID-19, to identify susceptibility and severity risk factors and to assess the proportion of positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologies according to disease-modifying treatments., Methods: This was a retrospective study of an MS cohort analysing data collected between February and May 2020. Cases were identified through an email survey and clinical visits. The relationship of demographic and MS characteristics with COVID-19 and of the disease-modifying treatments with SARS-CoV-2 serostatus were examined., Results: Data from 48 suspected cases out of 758 valid respondents and from 45 COVID-19 cases identified through clinical visits were collected. Incidence was 6.3%. Nineteen (20.3%) patients were hospitalized and two (2.2%) died. Multivariable models determined that age (odds ratio [OR] per 10 years 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.85), contact with a confirmed case (OR 197.02, 95% CI 56.36-688.79), residence in Barcelona (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.03-4.80), MS duration (OR per 5 years 1.41, 95% CI 1.09-1.83) and time on anti-CD20 treatment (OR per 2 years 3.48, 95% CI 1.44-8.45) were independent factors for presenting COVID-19 and age (OR per 10 years 2.71, 95% CI 1.13-6.53) for a severe COVID-19. Out of the 79 (84.9%) with serological test, 45.6% generated antibodies, but only 17.6% of those on anti-CD20 therapies. Lymphopaenia or immunoglobulin levels did not relate to COVID-19., Conclusions: Multiple sclerosis patients present similar incidence, risk factors and outcomes for COVID-19 as the general population. Patients treated with an anti-CD20 therapy for a longer period of time might be at a higher risk of COVID-19 and less than 20% generate an antibody response. Only age was related to severity., (© 2020 European Academy of Neurology.)

Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of AMD among optometric telemedicine users in Spain and to identify risk factors., Methods: Retrospective analysis of a nationwide database conducted on subjects attending to optometry centers, between January 2013 and December 2019. Fundus photographs were performed by optometrists, using non-mydriatic cameras, and evaluated by a group of 12 retina specialists., Results: Among the 119,877 subjects included, the overall prevalence of AMD was 7.6%. The prevalence of early, intermediate, and advanced AMD was 2.9%, 2.7%, and 2.0%, respectively. Of the 9129 AMD subjects, 1161 (12.7%) had geographic atrophy, and 1089 (11.9%) had neovascular AMD, either scar (4.5%) or exudative (7.4%). There was a significant association between AMD and age (per year older, adjusted odds ratio, OR 1.116; 95% CI 1.114 to 1.119, p<0.0001). Women had higher prevalence (adjusted OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.23, p<0.0001). Every diopter (spherical equivalent) of progress toward hyperopia was associated with a significant increase in early AMD prevalence (adjusted OR 1.02, 95 CI 1.01 to 1.04, p=0.0074). Presence of diabetes was associated with a lower AMD prevalence (p<0.0001)., Conclusions: The prevalence of AMD (any eye and any severity) was 7.6%, with a prevalence of advanced AMD of 2.0%. Older age and women were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of AMD, whereas myopia and presence of diabetes were associated with significantly lower odds of any AMD., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose of Review: This review focuses on new evidence supporting the global immunization strategy for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receiving disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), including the recently available vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection., Recent Findings: New data strengthen the evidence against a causal link between MS and vaccination. Recent consensus statements agree on the need to start vaccination early. Timings for vaccine administration should be adjusted to ensure safety and optimize vaccine responses, given the potential interference of DMDs. Patients treated with Ocrelizumab (and potentially other B-cell depleting therapies) are at risk of diminished immunogenicity to vaccines. This has relevant implications for the upcoming vaccination against SARS-CoV-2., Summary: An early assessment and immunization of MS patients allows optimizing vaccine responses and avoiding potential interference with treatment plans. Vaccinations are safe and effective but some specific considerations should be followed when vaccinating before, during, and after receiving immunotherapy. A time-window for vaccination taking into account the kinetics of B cell repopulation could potentially improve vaccine responses. Further understanding of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response dynamics in MS patients under specific therapies will be key for defining the best vaccination strategy., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The recommendation for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy was established in Catalonia in February 2014. The objective of this study was to compare the hospitalization rate for pertussis in children under one year of age before and after the implementation of the vaccination program., Methods: Observational and retrospective study of patients under one year of age admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of pertussis. The hospitalization rate of patients under one year of age of the period prior to the vaccination program (2008-2013) was compared with the period with vaccination program (2014-2019) in the total of children under one year of age and in 2subgroups: children under 3 months and between 3-11 months., Results: Hospitalization rate was significantly lower in the period with vaccination program in children under one year of age and specifically in children under 3 months (2.43 vs. 4.72 per 1,000 person-years and 6.47 vs. 13.11 per 1,000 person-years, respectively). The rate ratios were: 0.51 (95% CI 0.36-0.73) for children under one year of age; 0.49 (95% CI 0.32-0.75) for those younger than 3 months and 0.56 (95% CI 0.30-1.03) for those with 3-11 months. No statistically significant differences were observed in the clinical severity between both periods., Conclusion: The introduction of the pertussis vaccination program in pregnancy was associated with a global lower hospitalization rate for pertussis in children under one year of age and specifically in those under 3 months of age., (Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : The important development that the multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment field has experienced in the last years comes along with the need of dealing with new adverse events such as the increase risk of infections. In the shared therapeutic decision-making process, the MS expert neurologist should also balance the risks of specific infections under each particular treatment and be familiar with new mitigation strategies. Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an up-to-date review of the infection risk associated with MS treatments with a specific focus on risk mitigating strategies. The search was conducted using Pubmed® database (2000 - present) to identify publications that reported infection rates and infection complications for each treatment (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, cladribine, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, rituximab, and ocrelizumab). Expert opinion : Since the emergence of the first natalizumab-related PML case, the arrival of new MS therapies has come hand in hand with new infectious complications. MS-specialist neurologist has to face new challenges regarding the management of immunosuppression-related infectious complications. The implementation of patient-centered management focus on preventive and mitigating strategies with a multidisciplinary approach should be seen in the future as a marker of excellence of MS management.

Objective: To assess the added value of the optic nerve region (by using visual evoked potentials [VEPs]) to the current diagnostic criteria., Methods: From the Barcelona clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) cohort, patients with complete information to assess dissemination in space (DIS), the optic nerve region, and dissemination in time at baseline (n = 388) were selected. Modified DIS (modDIS) criteria were constructed by adding the optic nerve to the current DIS regions. The DIS and modDIS criteria were evaluated with univariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses with the time to the second attack as the outcome. A subset of these patients who had at least 10 years of follow-up or a second attack occurring within 10 years (n = 151) were selected to assess the diagnostic performance. The analyses were also performed according to CIS topography (optic neuritis vs non-optic neuritis)., Results: The addition of the optic nerve as a fifth region improved the diagnostic performance by slightly increasing the accuracy (2017 DIS 75.5%, modDIS 78.1%) and the sensitivity (2017 DIS 79.2%, modDIS 82.3%) without lowering the specificity (2017 DIS 52.4%, modDIS 52.4%). When the analysis was conducted according to CIS topography, the modDIS criteria performed similarly in both optic neuritis and non-optic neuritis CIS., Conclusion: The addition of the optic nerve, assessed by VEP, as a fifth region in the current DIS criteria slightly improves the diagnostic performance because it increases sensitivity without losing specificity., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: The recent development of highly effective treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) and the potential risk of infectious complications require the development of prevention and risk minimisation strategies. Vaccination is an essential element of the management of these patients. This consensus statement includes a series of recommendations and practical scenarios for the vaccination of adult patients with MS who are eligible for highly effective immunosuppressive treatments., Methodology: A formal consensus procedure was followed. Having defined the scope of the statement, we conducted a literature search on recommendations for the vaccination of patients with MS and specific vaccination guidelines for immunosuppressed patients receiving biological therapy for other conditions. The modified nominal group technique methodology was used to formulate the recommendations., Development: Vaccination in patients who are candidates for immunosuppressive therapy should be considered before starting immunosuppressive treatment providing the patient's clinical situation allows. Vaccines included in the routine adult vaccination schedule, as well as some specific ones, are recommended depending on the pre-existing immunity status. If immunosuppressive treatment is already established, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. For vaccines with a correlate of protection, it is recommended to monitor the serological response in an optimal interval of 1-2 months from the last dose., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To explore the long-term outcomes of patients with clinically isolated syndromes from the Barcelona cohort., Methods: We selected patients with a follow-up longer than 10 years to (1) estimate the risks of multiple sclerosis (MS) and disability accumulation according to the baseline number of T2 lesions and to compare treated versus untreated patients and early versus delayed treatment, and (2) to study baseline features of patients with aggressive MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ⩾6.0 at 10 years)., Results: In all, 401 patients were included (mean follow-up of 14.4 (standard deviation of 2.9) years). A higher number of T2 lesions was associated with an earlier MS diagnosis and an earlier risk of irreversible disability. Early treatment was associated with a decreased risk of EDSS of 3.0: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.4, 95% confidence interval = (0.2, 0.7). Patients with aggressive MS differed in their baseline brain magnetic resonance images: The median (interquartile range) number of T2 lesions and contrast-enhancing lesions (CEL) was 71 (28-95) versus 7 (1-19) and 3 (1-24) versus 0 (0-1), respectively. The cut-offs that better classified patients with aggressive MS were 20 for T2 lesions and 2 for CEL., Conclusion: Although MS natural history is changing, a high lesion load at onset is helpful to identify patients at risk of presenting an aggressive MS.

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, inflammatory and degenerative disease of the central nervous system. In most cases it is characterised by the recurring focal neurological deficit, which may become progressive over time. Given the chronic nature of the disease, patients may present with additional diseases (comorbidities), which affect the natural history of the disease and its treatment in different ways., Aim: To summarise the available evidence regarding the influence of comorbidities on the natural history of multiple sclerosis., Development: Patients with multiple sclerosis are at greater risk than the general population of developing both acute and chronic comorbidities. It has been shown that comorbidities can delay the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis after clinical onset, increase the rates of relapses and of accumulation of disability. Comorbidities also influence aspects of the choice of treatment and therapy adherence. Finally, comorbidities also increase the mortality rate and reduce the quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis., Conclusions: Screening, diagnosis and treatment of comorbidities are a key aspect of caring for patients with multiple sclerosis to improve their long-term prognosis in terms of disability, quality of life and mortality.

Background: Spasticity is a frequent multifactorial manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS), affecting mostly the chronic courses of the disease. Its impact on patient functioning and quality of life is profound. Treatment of spasticity includes oral and intrathecal anti-spastic drugs, muscle injections with relaxant agents, physical therapy, electrical and magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation, alone or in various combinations., Methods: This Italian consensus on the treatment of spasticity in MS was produced by a large group of Italian MS experts in collaboration with neurophysiologists, experts in the production of guidelines and patients' representatives operating under the umbrella of the Italian Neurological Society, the Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla and the European Charcot Foundation. This guideline was developed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 11 questions were formulated following the PICO framework (patients, intervention, comparator, outcome). Controlled studies only were included in the analysis., Results: Despite some consistent limitations due to the poor methodological quality of most studies, there was a consensus on a strong recommendation for the use of intrathecal baclofen, oromucosal spray of nabiximols and intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin. The level of recommendation was weak for oral baclofen, tizanidine, gabapentin, benzodiazepines and transcranial magnetic stimulation., Conclusions: There is a clear need for new larger multicentre well-designed clinical trials with a duration that allows the persistence of the effects and the long-term safety of the interventions to be evaluated., (© 2019 European Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective drug approved by the European Medicines Agency as a disease-modifying drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis., Objective: A consensus document was drafted on the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice in Spain., Development: A group of multiple sclerosis specialists reviewed articles addressing treatment with alemtuzumab in patients with multiple sclerosis and published before December 2017. The included studies assessed the drug's efficacy, effectiveness, and safety; screening for infections and vaccination; and administration and monitoring aspects. The initial proposed recommendations were developed by a coordinating group and based on the available evidence and their clinical experience. The consensus process was carried out in 2 stages, with the initial threshold percentage for group agreement established at 80%. The final document with all the recommendations agreed by the working group was submitted for external review and the comments received were considered by the coordinating group., Conclusion: The present document is intended to be used as a tool for optimising the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the effect of menarche, pregnancies, and breastfeeding on the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and disability accrual using a multivariate approach based on a large prospective cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)., Methods: A cross-sectional survey of the reproductive information of female participants in a CIS cohort was performed. We examined the relationship of age at menarche with the risk of clinically definite MS (CDMS), McDonald 2010 MS, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3.0 and 6.0. The effect of pregnancy (before and after CIS) and breastfeeding in the risk of CDMS, McDonald 2010 MS, and EDSS 3.0 was also examined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed and findings were confirmed using sensitivity analyses and a propensity score model., Results: The data of 501 female participants were collected. Age at menarche did not correlate with age at CIS and was not associated with the risk of CDMS or EDSS 3.0 or 6.0. Pregnancy before CIS was protective for CDMS in the univariate analysis, but the effect was lost in the multivariate model and did not modify the risk of EDSS 3.0. Pregnancy after CIS was protective for both outcomes in univariate and multivariate analyses when pregnancy was considered a baseline variable, but the protective effect disappeared when analyzed as a time-dependent event. Breastfeeding did not modify the risk for the 3 outcomes., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that menarche, pregnancies, and breastfeeding did not substantially modify the risk of CDMS or disability accrual using a multivariable and time-dependent approach., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Population-based studies on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are limited, and it is unclear whether the rates have changed with the implementation of the new 2015 criteria., Objectives: To estimate the incidence and prevalence of NMOSD in Catalonia (Spain), using both the 2006 and the 2015 criteria., Methods: In this clinic-based retrospective study, patients diagnosed with NMOSD between 2006 and 2015 were identified using multiple sources, including direct contact to all Catalan hospitals, identification of cases through the Catalan Health Surveillance System, and registry of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) in a reference laboratory. The incidence rate was calculated for the period 1 January 2006-1 January 2016 and prevalence for the date 1 January 2016., Results: We identified 74 patients (by the 2015 criteria). Most patients were Caucasian (81%), and female (76%) with a median age at disease onset of 42 years (range, 10-76 years). In total, 54 (73%) patients were positive for AQP4-IgG, 11 (15%) double-seronegative, and 9 (12%) MOG-IgG-positive. Rates of incidence and prevalence (0.63/1,000,000 person-years and 0.89/100,000, respectively) were 1.5-fold higher than those reported by the 2006 criteria. Lowest rates were seen in children and elder people and highest in women and middle-aged people (40-59 years). The female predominance was lost in incident AQP4-IgG-seronegative children and AQP4-IgG-positive elder people. MOG-IgG and double-seronegativity contributed similarly but did not influence the long-term outcome., Conclusion: The new criteria increase the estimates, but NMOSD remains as a rare disease. The differences in age- and sex-specific estimates highlight the importance of the serologic classification.

Background: Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is present since the very early stages of the disease and it has been related to long-term disability., Objective: To estimate brain volume (BV) at 15 years after a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and to evaluate its relationship with disease outcomes., Methods: From a prospective cohort including patients presenting with a CIS, 54 patients with a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 15 years after CIS were included. Brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), grey matter fraction (GMF) and white matter fraction (WMF) at 15-year follow-up were obtained. Regression analyses were conducted to predict BV loss and reaching an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 3.0 in that 15-year period., Results: In multivariable analyses, lower values of BPF and WMF were significantly associated with being male, presenting 3-4 Barkhof criteria at baseline, presenting a second relapse, and with a decision to start treatment. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, only lower GMF was associated with a greater risk of reaching EDSS 3.0 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.24, p = 0.028)., Conclusion: Lower BPF and WMF 15 years after CIS are associated with previous markers of inflammatory disease. Lower GMF 15 years after a CIS is associated with an increased risk of reaching an EDSS of 3.0.

Objective: To investigate the association between activity during interferon-beta (IFNβ) therapy and disability outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)., Methods: A longitudinal study based on two previously described cohorts of IFNβ-treated RRMS patients was conducted. Patients were classified according to clinical activity after 2 years (clinical cohort) or to clinical and radiological activity after 1 year (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cohort). Multivariate Cox models were calculated for early disease activity predicting long-term disability., Results: A total of 516 patients from two different cohorts were included in the analyses. Persistent clinical disease activity during the first 2 years of therapy predicted severe long-term disability (clinical cohort). In the MRI cohort, modified Rio score and no or minimal evidence of disease activity (NEDA/MEDA) did not identify patients with risk of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening. However, a Rio score ≥ 2 (hazard ratio (HR): 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-6.4); ≥3 new T2 lesions (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.5-5.6); or ≥2 Gd-enhancing lesions (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-4) were able to identify patients with EDSS worsening., Conclusion: Although early activity during IFNβ therapy is associated with poor long-term outcomes, minimal degree of activity does not seem to be predictive of EDSS worsening over 6.7-year mean follow-up.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease with new drugs becoming available in the past years. There is a need for a reference tool compiling current data to aid professionals in treatment decisions., Objectives: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of people with MS., Methods: This guideline has been developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology and following the updated EAN recommendations. Clinical questions were formulated in Patients-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome (PICO) format and outcomes were prioritized. The quality of evidence was rated into four categories according to the risk of bias. The recommendations with assigned strength (strong and weak) were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance. Consensus between the panelists was reached by use of the modified nominal group technique., Results: A total of 10 questions were agreed, encompassing treatment efficacy, response criteria, strategies to address suboptimal response and safety concerns and treatment strategies in MS and pregnancy. The guideline takes into account all disease-modifying drugs approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) at the time of publication. A total of 21 recommendations were agreed by the guideline working group after three rounds of consensus., Conclusion: The present guideline will enable homogeneity of treatment decisions across Europe.

Background and Purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease of the central nervous system. As new drugs are becoming available, knowledge on diagnosis and treatment must continuously evolve. There is therefore a need for a reference tool compiling current data on benefit and safety, to aid professionals in treatment decisions and use of resources across Europe. The European Committee of Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) have joined forces to meet this need. The objective was to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of people with MS to guide healthcare professionals in the decision-making process., Methods: This guideline has been developed using the GRADE methodology and following the recently updated EAN recommendations for guideline development. Clinical questions were formulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) and outcomes were prioritized according to their relevance to clinical practice. An exhaustive literature search up to December 2016 was performed for each question and the evidence is presented narratively and, when possible, combined in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The quality of evidence for each outcome was rated into four categories - very high, high, low and very low - according to the risk of bias. GRADE evidence profiles were created using GRADEprofiler (GRADEpro) software (Version 3.6). The recommendations with assigned strength (strong, weak) were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance. Consensus between the panellists was reached by use of the modified nominal group technique., Results: A total of 10 questions have been agreed, encompassing treatment efficacy, response criteria, strategies to address suboptimal response and safety concerns and treatment strategies in MS and pregnancy. The guideline takes into account all disease-modifying drugs approved by the European Medicine Agency at the time of publication. A total of 20 recommendations were agreed by the guideline working group members after three rounds of consensus., (© 2018 European Academy of Neurology and European Committee of Treatment of Research in Multiple Sclerosis.)