Search

Background: A multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) to Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) reported benefits of remplissage in reducing recurrent instability at 2 years postoperative. The ongoing benefits beyond this time point are yet to be explored., Purpose: To (1) compare medium-term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of these previously randomized patients undergoing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) to manage recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability; (2) examine the failure rate, overall recurrent instability, and reoperation rate., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1., Methods: Recruitment and randomization for the original randomized trial occurred between 2011 and 2017. Patients ≥14 years diagnosed with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with an engaging Hill-Sachs defect of any size were included. Those with a glenoid defect >15% were excluded. In 2020, participants were contacted by telephone and asked standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation, or reoperation on their study shoulder. "Failure" was defined as a redislocation, and "overall recurrent instability" was described as a redislocation or ≥2 subluxations. Descriptive statistics, relative risk, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were performed., Results: A total of 108 participants were randomized, of whom 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to the final follow-up was 49.3 and 53.8 months for the NO REMP and REMP groups, respectively. Failure rates were 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP group versus 8% (4/52) in the REMP group. Rates of overall recurrent instability were 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group versus 10% (5/52) in the REMP group. Survival curves were significantly different, favoring REMP in both scenarios., Conclusion: For the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and subcritical glenoid bone loss (<15%), a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative recurrent instability was observed with arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage than with isolated Bankart repair at a medium-term follow-up (mean of 4 years). Patients who did not receive a remplissage experienced a failure (redislocated) earlier and had a higher rate of revision/reoperation than those who received a concomitant remplissage., Registration: NCT01324531 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: The Pan Am Clinic Foundation is supported by Conmed, Arthrex, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, and Zimmer Biomet. J.M.W. has received consulting fees from Smither & Nephew and Stryker. P.B.M. has received consulting fees from Conmed and Arthrex. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Background: The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid have independently been reported to decrease bleeding, thereby improving surgeons' visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of intravenous tranexamic acid, epinephrine in the irrigation fluid, or the combination of both tranexamic acid and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. We hypothesized that intravenous tranexamic acid is more effective than epinephrine mixed in the irrigation fluid in improving visualization during shoulder arthroscopy, with no additive effect when both are used., Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were randomized into one of 4 study arms: (1) saline irrigation fluid (placebo); (2) epinephrine (0.33 mL of 1:1000 per liter) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI); (3) 1 g intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA); and (4) epinephrine and tranexamic acid combined (TXA + EPI). Visualization was rated intraoperatively on a scale from 0, indicating poor clarity, to 3, indicating excellent clarity, every 15 minutes and overall. The primary outcome measure was the overall rating of visualization. A stepwise linear regression was performed using visualization as the dependent variable and independent variables including presence or absence of epinephrine and tranexamic acid, surgery duration, complexity, mean arterial pressure, increase in pump pressure, and volume of irrigation fluid., Results: One hundred twenty-eight patients (mean age 56 years) were randomized. Mean visual clarity for the placebo, TXA, EPI, and TXA + EPI groups were 2.0 (±0.6), 2.0 (±0.6), 2.6 (±0.5), and 2.7 (±0.5), respectively (P < .001). The presence or absence of epinephrine was the most significant predictor of visual clarity (P < .001). Tranexamic acid presence or absence had no effect. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups., Conclusion: Intravenous tranexamic acid is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries, and there is no additive effect when both are used., (Copyright © 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the retear rate remains high. New methods to optimize healing rates must be sought. Bone channeling may create a quicker and more vigorous healing response by attracting autologous mesenchymal stem cells, cytokines, and growth factors to the repair site., Hypothesis: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bone channeling would result in a higher healing rate compared with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without adjuvant channeling., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1., Methods: Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Secondary objectives included comparisons of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, Constant strength subscore, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score between groups. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited at 3 sites and were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing was determined via ultrasound at 24 months postoperatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively., Results: A total of 168 patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2018. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the 2 interventions at 24 months postoperatively. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from preoperatively to all time points for the WORC, the ASES score, the Constant score or Constant strength subscore, and the VAS for pain ( P < .0001). No differences were observed between the bone channeling and control groups in WORC, ASES, Constant, and VAS pain scores at any time point., Conclusion: This trial did not demonstrate the superiority of intraoperative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair over standard rotator cuff repair at 24 months postoperatively. Healing rates, patient-reported function, and quality-of-life outcomes were similar between groups., Registration: NCT01877772 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of Popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy vs. tenodesis and evaluate risk factors and subjective and objective outcomes., Methods: Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial in which patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery for a long head of the biceps tendon lesion were allocated to undergo tenotomy or tenodesis. The primary outcome measure for this secondary analysis was rate of Popeye deformity at 24 months postoperation as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Those with a deformity indicated their satisfaction with the appearance of their arm on a 10-cm visual analog scale, rated their pain and cramping, and completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Cohen kappa was calculated to measure inter-rater reliability between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of presence or absence of a Popeye deformity., Results: One hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, of which 42 to the tenodesis group and 45 to the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. Based on clinical observation, the odds of a Popeye in the tenotomy group were 4.3 times greater than in the tenodesis group (P = .018) with incidence of 33% (15/45) and 9.5% (4/42), respectively. Surgical technique was the only significant predictor of perceived deformity, with male gender trending toward significance (odds ratio 7.33, 95% confidence interval 0.867-61.906, P = .067). Mean (standard deviation) satisfaction score of those with a deformity regarding appearance of their arm was 7.3 (2.6). Increasing satisfaction was correlated with increasing age (r = 0.640, P = .025), but there was no association with gender (r = -0.155, P = .527) or body mass index (r = -0.221, P = .057). Differences in subjective outcomes were dependent on whether the Popeye was clinician- or self-assessed., Conclusion: The odds of developing a perceived Popeye deformity was 4.3 higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis based on clinician observation. Male gender was trending toward being predictive of having a deformity. Pain and cramping were increased in those with a self-reported Popeye. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger male patients to minimize the risk of Popeye and the risk of dissatisfaction in the appearance of their arm following surgery., (Copyright © 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported and clinic outcomes between arthroscopic Bankart repair with (REMP) and without (NO REMP) arthroscopic infraspinatus remplissage in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss., Methods: Patients 14 years or older with a recurrent anterior shoulder instability with the presence of an engaging Hill-Sachs defect (of any size) confirmed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were eligible to participate. Consented patients were randomized intraoperatively to NO REMP or REMP. Study visits were conducted preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postoperative recurrent shoulder instability, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, range of motion, complications, and revision surgery. To compare groups, a mixed-effects linear model was used for continuous variables and a χ 2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical data. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed survival distribution between groups., Results: One hundred and eight patients were randomized to Bankart repair with (n = 54) or without (n = 54) remplissage. The mean follow-up was 26.5 months (21-53 months) and 24.3 months (23-64 months) for the REMP and NO REMP groups, respectively. Rates of postoperative recurrent instability were higher (P = .027) in the NO REMP group with 9 of 50 (18%) vs. 2 of 52 (4%) postoperative dislocations in the REMP group. There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes between groups at any time point. Survival curve distributions were also significantly different favoring REMP (χ 2 = 5.255, P = .022). There was a significant difference in rate of revision surgery between groups with 6 in the NO REMP and none in the REMP groups (P = .029). Post hoc, patients were noted to have a higher risk for re-dislocation if their Hill-Sachs lesion was ≥20 mm in width or ≥15% of humeral head diameter. One intraoperative complication was reported in the REMP group., Conclusions: There is significantly greater risk of postoperative recurrent instability in patients who did not have a remplissage performed in conjunction with an arthroscopic Bankart repair for the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with Hill-Sachs lesions of any size and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%) at 2 years postoperatively. Otherwise, there are no differences in patient-reported outcomes, complications, or shoulder function at 2 years postoperatively. In addition, the remplissage procedure has significantly lower rates of re-dislocation in high-risk patients with Hill-Sachs lesions ≥20 mm and/or ≥15% in size., (Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Both intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine prolong the analgesic duration of interscalene blocks (ISB) after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. This study compared their relative effectiveness and the benefit of their use in combination., Methods: This single-centre, double-blinded, parallel three-group superiority trial randomized 198 adult patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Patients received preoperative ISB with 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 50 µg dexmedetomidine or 4 mg dexamethasone or both of these agents as intravenous adjuncts. The primary outcome was analgesic block duration. Secondary outcomes included the quality of recovery 15 score (range: 0-150) on day 1 and postoperative neurologic symptoms in the surgical arm., Results: Block durations (n = 195) with dexamethasone (median [range], 24.5 [2.0-339.5] hr) and both adjuncts (24.0 [1.5-157.0] hr) were prolonged compared with dexmedetomidine (16.0 [1.5-154.0] hr). When analyzed by linear regression after an unplanned log transformation because of right-skewed data, the corresponding prolongations of block duration were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28 to 97) and 46% (95% CI, 18 to 80), respectively (both P < 0.001). The combined adjuncts were not superior to dexamethasone alone (-8%; 95% CI, -26 to 14; P = 0.42). Median [IQR] quality of recovery 15 scores (n = 197) were significantly different only between dexamethasone (126 [79-149]) and dexmedetomidine (118.5 [41-150], P = 0.004), but by an amount less than the 8-point minimum clinically important difference., Conclusion: Dexamethasone is superior to dexmedetomidine as an intravenous adjunct for prolongation of bupivacaine-based ISB analgesic duration. There was no additional benefit to using both adjuncts in combination., Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03270033); registered 1 September 2017.

Objective: Previous systematic reviews looking at timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) examined the functional outcomes and range of motion; however, few have quantified the effect of timing of surgery on secondary pathology. The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of early ACLRs versus delayed ACLR on the incidence of meniscal and chondral lesions., Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL on March 20, 2018, for randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared early and delayed ACLR in a skeletally mature population. Two reviewers independently identified trials, extracted trial-level data, performed risk-of-bias assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and evaluated the study methodology using the Detsky scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with the primary outcome being the total number of meniscal and chondral lesions per group., Results: Of 1887 citations identified from electronic and hand searches, we included 4 unique RCTs (303 patients). We considered early reconstruction as <3 weeks and delayed reconstruction as >4 weeks after injury. There was no evidence of a difference between early and late ACLR regarding the incidence of meniscal [relative risk (RR), 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-1.29] or chondral lesions (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.59-1.29), postoperative infection, graft rupture, functional outcomes, or range of motion., Conclusions: We found no evidence of benefit of early ACLR. Further studies may consider delaying surgery even further (eg, >3 months) to determine whether there are any real benefits to earlier reconstruction., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments targeting shoulder pathologies use subjective outcome measures such as self-administered questionnaires. To date, there are no validated tools that objectively measure shoulder-specific functional activity. The purpose of this study was to validate wearable accelerometers as an objective proxy for shoulder activity. Ten healthy volunteers wore accelerometers placed at both wrists, the dominant upper arm and the chest while performing standardised shoulder and non-shoulder activities. Recorded tridimensional acceleration was computed into activity counts for epochs of 10 s. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were built to determine the optimal configuration to classify shoulder-type activities. For single accelerometer placement, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was optimal for the 10-s epoch (AUC = 0.779) using the wrist placement, with a sensitivity of 94.1% and specificity of 67.5%. The combined upper arm and chest placement had an AUC of 0.985 (94.8% sensitivity, 94.8% specificity). Dual-accelerometer placement (upper arm and chest) is the optimal configuration to classify shoulder activity. However, a sole wrist-based accelerometer can be used as an objective proxy for shoulder activity in long-term unsupervised monitoring with excellent sensitivity and acceptable specificity.

Background: The biceps tendon is a known source of shoulder pain. Few high-level studies have attempted to determine whether biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is the optimal approach in the treatment of biceps pathology. Most available literature is of lesser scientific quality and shows varying results in the comparison of tenotomy and tenodesis., Purpose: To compare patient-reported and objective clinical results between tenotomy and tenodesis for the treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1., Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic surgery with intraoperative confirmation of a lesion of the long head of the biceps tendon were randomized. The primary outcome measure was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, while secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score, elbow and shoulder strength, operative time, complications, and the incidence of revision surgery with each procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at postoperative 1 year to evaluate the integrity of the procedure in the tenodesis group., Results: A total of 114 participants with a mean age of 57.7 years (range, 34 years to 86 years) were randomized to undergo either biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. ASES and WORC scores improved significantly from pre- to postoperative time points, with a mean difference of 32.3% ( P < .001) and 37.3% ( P < .001), respectively, with no difference between groups in either outcome from presurgery to postoperative 24 months. The relative risk of cosmetic deformity in the tenotomy group relative to the tenodesis group at 24 months was 3.5 (95% CI, 1.26-9.70; P = .016), with 4 (10%) occurrences in the tenodesis group and 15 (33%) in the tenotomy group. Pain improved from 3 to 24 months postoperatively ( P < .001) with no difference between groups. Cramping was not different between groups, nor was any improvement in cramping seen over time. There were no differences between groups in elbow flexion strength or supination strength. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging at postoperative 12 months showed that the tenodesis was intact for all patients., Conclusion: Tenotomy and tenodesis as treatment for lesions of the long head of biceps tendon both result in good subjective outcomes but there is a higher rate of Popeye deformity in the tenotomy group., Registration: NCT01747902 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures. However, the outcome of repair with cortical button fixation has not been extensively evaluated. The hypothesis of the present study was that elbow strength and range of motion would be less than normal after repair but that ongoing disability would be minimal as measured with use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with complete distal biceps tendon rupture that was repaired with cortical button fixation via a 1-incision anterior approach. Outcome was assessed on the basis of elbow range-of-motion and strength measurements, DASH scores, and radiographs of the operatively treated elbow. Descriptive statistics were generated for patient demographics and outcome variables. Strength was assessed with limb-symmetry index, and range of motion was evaluated with paired t tests., Results: Sixty male patients consented to this study. The average age at the time of follow-up was 49.6 ± 7.8 years, and the average time from injury to follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.7 years. The mechanism of injury included lifting heavy objects (62%) and sporting activities (25%). Elbow flexion and supination range of motion were not different between the operatively treated and contralateral arms. The operatively treated elbow demonstrated decreased flexion strength (96% of that on the contralateral side) and supination strength (91% of that on the contralateral side). The findings did not change when controlling for hand dominance. The mean DASH score was 7.9 ± 11.4, which is not significantly different from the normative value for the general population. Postoperative complications included heterotopic ossification (Brooker class I [29 patients] or II [5 patients]), neurapraxia (7 patients), and rerupture (3 patients)., Conclusions: The repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures with cortical button fixation was associated with decreased strength in elbow flexion and forearm supination compared with the contralateral arm, although the differences were small and likely were not clinically important. The complication rate was relatively high; however, most complications were minor and were associated with minimal disability, as reflected by the DASH scores., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy; however, complication rates are relatively high (19%-50%), with implant instability and infection being particularly devastating to overall outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze the highest level of data comparing dislocation rates and outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with and without the subscapularis tendon repaired., Methods: The databases MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched using a sensitive search strategy for this meta-analysis/systematic review. Eligibility included any studies in which patients were treated with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in which the status of the subscapularis tendon could be determined. A data extraction form was developed to collect select data from the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed on pooled data of 5 studies comparing dislocation rates and 3 studies comparing postoperative forward elevation, rate of infection, overall complication rates, and fractures., Results: Two independent researchers reviewed 1008 studies. Seven studies met inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed on all level III studies, resulting in 1306 patients being analyzed. Results demonstrated lower dislocation rates in the subscapularis repair group (odds ratio, 0.19; P < .001). However, in patients without a subscapularis repair, lateralized center of rotation (COR) resulted in a significantly lower dislocation rate compared with medialized COR (odds ratio, 0.24; P < .001)., Conclusion: The results of our meta-analysis of the available data demonstrated a decrease in dislocation risk when the subscapularis tendon was repaired in medialized and lateralized designs. When subscapularis repair is not performed, lateralized COR, regardless of humeral socket design, may reduce the dislocation rates., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Surgical management of a young patient with a stable but painful acromioclavicular (AC) joint but normal imagining is a challenging problem. A standard arthroscopic excision of distal clavicle seems too aggressive. An alternative procedure is arthroscopic debridement of the joint, particularly the often torn meniscus, and chondroplasty. This study demonstrates in younger patients the medium-term result of arthroscopic debridement of a painful AC joint., Methods: Fifty-three young adult patients with a stable but painful AC joint, and virtually normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, had arthroscopic debridement of the AC joint. Follow-up was with questionnaire and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES)., Results: Mean age was 29 years (18-39), 41 male, 31 dominant arm. Twenty-two patients demonstrated additional shoulder pathology. Two patients had a later distal clavicle excision. Five patients had later surgery to other areas of the shoulder but had an asymptomatic AC joint. Thirty-eight patients completed the ASES questionnaire at mean 44 months (24-86) post-operation. The mean ASES score was 82.8 (52-100). There was no association between ASES score and AC joint disease severity found at operation ( p = 0.25). Seven patients had ongoing shoulder symptoms, although none were severe enough to warrant any treatment., Conclusion: In this young group of patients with arthroscopic AC joint debridement, most had good relief of the AC joint related symptoms. This is a worthwhile procedure in the young patient, with quick recovery, and does not preclude further AC joint surgery later.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of deep shoulder infections after RCR on patient outcomes., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted involving all patients with deep shoulder infections after arthroscopic RCR (study group). Another group of patients who were matched with the study group by age, gender and rotator cuff tear size, and did not develop deep shoulder infections after arthroscopic RCR were randomly identified (control group). The two groups were compared in terms of time to start physiotherapy, shoulder function, and delay in return to work., Results: There were 10 patients in each group. The mean time to start physiotherapy after surgery was 145.3 (SD=158.8) days for the study group and 40.0 (SD=13.7) days for the control group (p=.051). The average forward elevation of the operated shoulder was 133 (SD=33.4) degrees for the study group, and 172 (SD=12.0) degrees for the control group (p=0.003). The average time to return to work at preoperative level was 5.6 months for the study group and 3 months for the control group., Conclusion: Deep shoulder infections after RCR significantly impedes time to start physiotherapy, shoulder function, and patients' ability to return to work., Level of Evidence: III b [retrospective comparative (case-control) study]., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Purpose: Dexamethasone prolongs the duration of interscalene block, but the benefits of higher doses and perineural vs intravenous administration remain unclear., Methods: This factorial design, double-blinded trial randomized 280 adult patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery at a single centre in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Patients received ultrasound-guided interscalene block with 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 4 mg or 8 mg dexamethasone by either the perineural or intravenous route. The primary outcome (block duration measured as the time of first pain at the surgical site) and secondary outcomes (adverse effects, postoperative neurologic symptoms) were assessed by telephone. In this superiority trial, the predetermined minimum clinically important difference for comparisons between doses and routes was 3.0 hr., Results: The perineural route significantly prolonged the mean block duration by 2.0 hr (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 3.5 hr; P = 0.01), but 8 mg of dexamethasone did not significantly prolong the mean block duration compared with 4 mg (1.3 hr; 95% CI, -0.3 to 2.9 hr, P = 0.10), and there was no significant statistical interaction (P = 0.51). The mean (95% CI) block durations, in hours, were 24.0 (22.9 to 25.1), 24.8 (23.2 to 26.3), 25.4 (23.8 to 27.0), and 27.2 (25.2 to 29.3) for intravenous doses of 4 and 8 mg and perineural doses of 4 and 8 mg, respectively. There were no marked differences in side effects between groups. At 14 postoperative days, 57 (20.4%) patients reported neurologic symptoms, including dyspnea and hoarseness. At six months postoperatively, only six (2.1%) patients had residual symptoms, with four (1.4%) patients' symptoms unlikely related to interscalene block., Conclusion: Compared with the intravenous route, perineural dexamethasone prolongs the mean interscalene block duration by a small amount that may or may not be clinically significant, regardless of dose. However, the difference in mean block durations between 8 mg and 4 mg of dexamethasone is highly unlikely to be clinically important, regardless of the administration route., Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02426736). Registered 14 April 2015.

Purpose: To evaluate the risk of neurological injury from the placement of a bicortical guidewire during subpectoral biceps tenodesis., Methods: Ten forequarter cadaver specimens were evaluated. A bicortical guidewire was placed, and measurements to important local neurological structures were made with digital calipers at open dissection., Results: The mean (range, SD) distances from the guidewire to the respective nerves was as follows: axillary nerve posteriorly, 15.7 mm (10-22 mm, 3.4); axillary nerve laterally, 18.7 mm (12-27 mm, 4.3); radial nerve posteriorly, 26.2 mm (16-35 mm, 7.0); radial nerve medially, 25 mm (16-33 mm, 4.4); and musculocutaneous nerve, 20.1 mm (12-26 mm, 5.2)., Conclusions: There has been some disagreement in the literature regarding the proximity of a bicortical guidewire to the axillary nerve posteriorly. The results of this study concur with reports from several other authors and demonstrate that this nerve is at risk of iatrogenic injury when using this technique. The clinical relevance of this work is to allow surgeons to better understand the proximity of the nerve to a bicortical guidewire and to highlight that this risk is avoided with a unicortical technique.

Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery. The reported incidence of deep soft-tissue infections after RCR ranges between 0.3% and 1.9%. Deep shoulder infection after RCR appears uncommon, but the actual incidence may be higher as many cases may go unreported. Clinical presentation may include increasing shoulder pain and stiffness, high temperature, local erythema, swelling, warmth, and fibrinous exudate. Generalized fatigue and signs of sepsis may be present in severe cases. Varying clinical presentation coupled with a low index of suspicion may result in delayed diagnosis. Laboratory findings include high erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level, and, rarely, abnormal peripheral blood leucocyte count. Aspiration of glenohumeral joint synovial fluid with analysis of cell count, gram staining and culture should be performed in all patients suspected with deep shoulder infection after RCR. The most commonly isolated pathogens are Propionibacterium acnes , Staphylococcus epidermidis , and Staphylococcus aureus . Management of a deep soft-tissue infection of the shoulder after RCR involves surgical debridement with lavage and long-term intravenous antibiotic treatment based on the pathogen identified. Although deep shoulder infection after RCR is usually successfully treated, complications of this condition can be devastating. Prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic treatment, extensive soft-tissue destruction and adhesions may result in substantially diminished functional outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

The recent literature shows that imaging modalities, physical examination tests, and glenohumeral arthroscopy all have low sensitivities and specificities with respect to the diagnosis of the long head of biceps tendon pathology. Biceps tenoscopy is a strategy that aims to reduce the rate of missed diagnoses by improving visualization of the extra-articular part of the tendon. This is an area of predilection of pathology that is not adequately visualized with conventional arthroscopic techniques. This technical note presents the surgical technique for biceps tenoscopy.

Background: Pulling the long head of the biceps tendon into the joint at arthroscopy is a common method for evaluation of tendinopathic lesions. However, the rate of missed diagnoses when using this technique is reported to be as high as 30% to 50%., Hypothesis: Tendon excursion achieved using a standard arthroscopic probe does not allow adequate visualization of extra-articular sites of predilection of tendinopathy., Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study., Methods: Seven forequarter amputation cadaveric specimens were evaluated. The biceps tendon was tagged to mark the intra-articular length and the maximum excursions achieved using a probe and a grasper in both beach-chair and lateral positions. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance to compare means., Results: The mean intra-articular and extra-articular lengths of the tendons were 23.9 and 82.3 mm, respectively. The length of tendon that could be visualized by pulling it into the joint with a probe through the anterior midglenoid portal was not significantly different when using either lateral decubitus (mean ± SD, 29.9 ± 3.89 mm; 95% CI, 25.7-34 mm) or beach-chair positions (32.7 ± 4.23 mm; 95% CI, 28.6-36.8 mm). The maximum length of the overall tendon visualized in any specimen using a standard technique was 37 mm. Although there was a trend to greater excursion using a grasper through the same portal, this was not statistically significant. However, using a grasper through the anterosuperior portal gave a significantly greater mean excursion than any other technique (46.7 ± 4.31 mm; 95% CI, 42.6-50.8 mm), but this still failed to allow evaluation of Denard zone C., Conclusion: Pulling the tendon into the joint with a probe via an anterior portal does not allow visualization of distal sites of predilection of pathology. Surgeons should be aware that this technique is inadequate and can result in missed diagnoses., Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrates that glenohumeral arthroscopy does not allow visualization of common areas of pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon.

Background: External rotation (ER) bracing has been shown to improve labral reduction in cadaveric studies, but this has not translated to universal improvement in re-dislocation rates in clinical series., Purpose: To systematically review and critically appraise the literature that investigates how well the labrum is actually reduced by ER in patients who have had an anterior shoulder dislocation., Study Design: Systematic review., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using the online databases Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register. Studies were included if they reported on the difference in labral reduction after ER and internal rotation bracing in patients who had a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation., Results: Of the 6 studies included, 5 assessed labral reduction on magnetic resonance imaging and 1 arthroscopically. Each study reported an overall improvement in labral reduction with ER, but anatomic reduction was not commonly achieved. This was despite the use of extreme positions that are unlikely to be well tolerated., Conclusion: External rotation results in anatomic reduction of the labrum in only 35% of cases. We postulate that failure to reduce the labrum may be a contraindication to ER bracing and propose further study to determine whether acute MRI could be used to help identify patients in whom ER achieves labral reduction in a comfortable position. This approach also has the advantage of avoiding the significant inconvenience of ER bracing in those in whom the labrum does not reduce and are therefore theoretically less likely to benefit. However, it is a novel strategy with significant resource implications and therefore warrants further study., (© 2014 The Author(s).)

Background: The aim of this retrospective case series study was to assess the outcomes of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability with antero-inferior glenoid bone loss treated with a specific open stabilization technique using intra-substance coracoid bone-grafting and Bankart repair., Methods: Over a 4-year period, 34 shoulders in all male patients of mean age 21 years were stabilized with this technique. Pre- and postoperative function, motion and stability were assessed as part of Rowe stability scoring, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Oxford Instability were recorded, with at least 2 years of follow-up in all patients. Union of the graft was determined by post-operative computed tomography (CT) of the affected shoulder., Results: For all cases, two redislocations (5.9%) and two subluxations occurred when continuing high-risk sport after 2 years. Post-operative scores [median, mean (SD): Rowe 77.5, 77.2 (19.5); ASES 94.2, 92 (7.7); Oxford 43, 41.2 (6)]. CT scans on 28 shoulders at a mean of 4.5 months after surgery showed non-union in three cases (10%)., Conclusions: These results demonstrate a high rate of success in cases of glenoid bone loss in the young contact athlete with recurrent instability treated with open stabilization and bone grafting.

Introduction: Arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage describes the fixation of the posterior aspect of the capsule and the infraspinatus tendon into a posterosuperior humeral head impaction fracture in cases of recurrent anteroinferior glenohumeral instability., Step 1 Anterior Capsulolabral Mobilization and Glenoid Preparation: Perform diagnostic arthroscopy through a standard posterior portal to rule out additional pathology and document the "engaging" nature of the Hill-Sachs defect., Step 2 Preparation of the Hill-Sachs Defect: With the camera remaining in the posterior portal, the assistant provides visualization of the Hill-Sachs defect by translating the humeral head anteriorly over the glenoid rim with direct pressure on the proximal part of the humerus., Step 3 Remplissage With the Posterior Aspect of the Capsule and Infraspinatus Tendon: Transfer the camera to the anterior portal and leave a switching stick in the posterior portal; under direct visualization, withdraw the posterolateral cannula from the posterior aspect of the capsule and the infraspinatus tendon until it rests in the subdeltoid space (∼1 cm)., Step 4 Anterior Bankart Repair: Transition the camera back to the standard posterior portal over a switching stick in order to perform the Bankart repair., Step 5 Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocol: Patients wear a brace and perform pendulum exercises for four weeks, and then initiate range-of-motion exercises; they avoid strengthening for eight weeks and sports for three to six months., Results: In our recently published series of forty-seven patients (forty-two male and five female; average age, twenty-nine years), the use of Bankart repair combined with Hill-Sachs remplissage performed according to the above algorithm resulted in 98% of the patients being satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical result and a recurrent instability rate of only 2% at a mean of twenty-four months postoperatively.IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Background: Benefits of graft harvest from the side contralateral to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient leg have been identified when using bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in ACL reconstruction (ACLR). As hamstring tendon autografts are becoming more commonly used, a study examining the effect of contralateral graft harvest of semitendinosus gracilis (STG) tendons on patient quality of life was conducted., Purpose: To evaluate if ACLR using a hamstring tendon autograft results in better patient quality of life if the graft is harvested from the leg contralateral to the ACL rupture compared with the ipsilateral leg., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1., Methods: A total of 100 participants between 16 and 50 years of age with a complete ACL tear were randomly assigned to undergo ACLR using either the ipsilateral or contralateral leg as the STG graft donor. Primary outcome measures were the ACL Quality of Life questionnaire (ACL-QOL), concentric knee flexion and extension strength at 60 and 240 deg/s, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee assessment form, early postoperative pain and diary of analgesic use, and rate of reruptures. Outcome measures were evaluated before surgery and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery., Results: The ACL-QOL score improved over time for both groups (P < .001), and there were no significant differences between groups at any time point (P = .528). Significant differences in knee flexion and extension strength were found at 3 months after surgery. There were no differences between groups in IKDC knee assessment scores or rerupture rates., Conclusion: There does not appear to be any measurable benefit or drawback in quality of life to the use of an STG graft from the unaffected limb. In light of this finding, further research to examine other possible effects on agility and balance as well as time and ability to return to sport should be conducted. Longer term follow-up beyond 2 years would allow for a more thorough evaluation of the risk of reruptures or contralateral reruptures using this novel approach.

Background: Large osseous defects of the posterosuperior aspect of the humeral head can engage the glenoid rim and cause recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair for glenohumeral dislocation. Filling of the humeral head defect with the posterior aspect of the capsule and the infraspinatus tendon (i.e., Hill-Sachs remplissage) has recently been proposed as an additional arthroscopic procedure. Our hypothesis is that the capsulotenodesis heals in the humeral bone defect without a severe adverse effect on shoulder mobility, allowing return to preinjury sports activity., Methods: Of 459 patients operated on for recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability, forty-seven (10.2%) underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with Hill-Sachs remplissage with use of suture anchors. All had a large Hill-Sachs lesion (Calandra grade III), engaging over the glenoid rim, without substantial glenoid bone loss. Nine patients had had prior unsuccessful surgery to address glenohumeral instability (three Bankart and six Bristow-Latarjet procedures). The average age at the time of surgery (and standard deviation) was 29 ± 5.4 years. Postoperatively, comparative shoulder motion was precisely measured with use of digital photographic images. Capsulotenodesis healing was assessed on a computed tomography (CT) arthrogram (n = 38) or magnetic resonance image (MRI) (n = 4). The mean duration of follow-up was twenty-four months., Results: Healing of the posterior aspect of the capsule and the infraspinatus tendon into the humeral defect was observed in all forty-two patients who underwent postoperative imaging, and thirty-one (74%) had a remplissage of ≥75%. Compared with the normal (contralateral) side, the mean deficit in external rotation was 8° ± 7° with the arm at the side of the trunk and 9° ± 7° in abduction at the time of the last follow-up. Of forty-one patients involved in sports, thirty-seven (90%) were able to return postoperatively and twenty-eight (68%) returned to the same level of sports, including those involving overhead activities. Ninety-eight percent (forty-six) of the forty-seven patients had a stable shoulder at the time of the last follow-up., Conclusions: Arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage, performed in combination with a Bankart repair, is a potential solution for patients with a large engaging humeral head bone defect but no substantial glenoid bone loss. The posterior capsulotenodesis heals predictably in the humeral defect. The slight restriction in external rotation (approximately 10°) does not significantly affect return to sports, including those involving overhead activities. The procedure, which may also be useful for revision of previous failed glenohumeral instability surgery, is not indicated for patients with glenoid bone deficiency.

Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility and safety of a novel arthroscopic technique combining a Bristow-Latarjet procedure with a Bankart repair and to report the early clinical and radiologic results., Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients with glenoid bone loss and capsular deficiency were treated with this all-arthroscopic technique; six patients had a failed arthroscopic capsulolabral repair. The coracoid fragment was osteotomized, passed with the conjoined tendon through the subscapularis muscle, and fixed in the standing position with a cannulated screw on the abraded glenoid neck. The capsule and labrum were then reattached on the glenoid rim, leaving the coracoid bone block in an extra-articular position. Potential intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. All patients were reviewed and had postoperative radiographs; 35 had computed tomography scans., Results: The procedure was performed entirely arthroscopically in 41 of 47 patients (88%); a conversion to open surgery was needed in 6 patients (12%). The axillary nerve was identified in all cases, and no neurologic injuries were observed. No patient had any recurrence of instability at the most recent follow-up (mean, 16 months). The mean Rowe score was 88 ± 16.7, and the mean Walch-Duplay score was 87.6 ± 12.9. The Subjective Shoulder Value was 87.5% ± 12.7%. The bone block was subequatorial in 98% of the cases (46 of 47) and flush to the glenoid surface in 92% (43 of 47); it was too lateral in 1 (2%) and too medial (>5 mm) in 3 (6%). There was 1 bone block fracture and 7 migrations., Conclusions: The arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet-Bankart procedure is reproducible and safe. This procedure allows restoration of shoulder stability in patients with glenoid bone loss and capsular deficiency, as well as in the case of failed capsulolabral repair. Arthroscopy offers the advantage of providing adequate visualization of both the glenohumeral joint and the anterior neck of the scapula, allowing accurate placement of the bone block and screw. Surgeons should be aware that the procedure is technically difficult and potentially dangerous because of the proximity of the brachial plexus and axillary vessels. Training on cadaveric specimens and transition from open to mini-open and, finally, to all arthroscopic is recommended., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series., (Copyright © 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The all-arthroscopic technique that the authors propose combines a Bristow-Latarjet procedure with a Bankart repair. This combined procedure provides a triple blocking of the shoulder (the so-called 2B3 procedure): (1) the labral repair recreates the anterior bumper and protects the humeral head from direct contact with the coracoid bone graft (Bumper effect); (2) the transferred coracoid bone block compensates for anterior glenoid bone loss (Bony effect); and (3) the transferred conjoined tendon creates a dynamic sling that reinforces the weak anteroinferior capsule by lowering the inferior part of the subscapularis when the arm is abducted and externally rotated (Belt or sling effect). The procedure combines the theoretic advantages of the Bristow-Latarjet procedure and the arthroscopic Bankart repair, eliminating the potential disadvantages of each. The extra-articular positioning of the bone block together with the labral repair and capsule retensioning allows the surgeon to perform a nearly anatomic shoulder repair. This novel procedure allows the surgeon to extend the indications of arthroscopic shoulder reconstruction to the subset of patients with recurrent anteroinferior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss and capsular deficiency. It is an attractive surgical option to treat patients with a previous failed capsulolabral repair for which the surgical solutions are limited., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We described a novel all-arthroscopic technique of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction and reported the early clinical and radiologic results of this procedure., Methods: We performed all-arthroscopic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in 10 consecutive patients (8 men and 2 women; mean age, 41 years) with a symptomatic chronic and complete acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation (Rockwood type III or IV). Four patients had undergone surgery previously: two had initial pinning of the acute AC joint separation, and two had a subsequent Mumford procedure. The surgical technique, performed entirely by arthroscopy, consisted of (1) rerouting the coracoacromial ligament with a bone block harvested from the tip of the acromion in a socket created in the distal clavicle (Chuinard's modification of the Weaver-Dunn procedure) and (2) augmenting the reconstruction with 2 titanium buttons connected by a heavy suture in a 4-strand configuration (Double-Button fixation; Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA). Patients were prospectively followed up for a mean of 12.8 months (range, 6 to 20 months)., Results: One patient had a superficial infection of the superior (clavicular) portal, which resolved with oral antibiotics. At the most recent review, all patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the cosmesis, and 9 of 10 returned to previous sports, including contact and overhead sports. All symptoms resolved (pain, shoulder weakness, paresthesia). The mean postoperative University of California, Los Angeles modified AC rating score was 16.5 points (range, 13 to 18 points) out of 20 points. The mean Subjective Shoulder Value improved from 36% (range, 0% to 70%) preoperatively to 82.5% (range, 70% to 100%) postoperatively (P = .005). The bone block was totally healed in the medullary canal in 8 cases and partially healed in 2. No loss of reduction was observed in any of the patients., Conclusions: Our study shows that severe chronic symptomatic AC joint separations, defined as Rockwood types III through V, can be repaired entirely by arthroscopy safely and effectively by transferring the coracoacromial ligament with a bone block in the distal clavicle. The bone block transfer (Weaver-Dunn-Chuinard procedure) has the advantage of making the repair easier and stronger, and it provides bone-to-bone healing by use of free, autologous vascularized tissue. Double-Button fixation has the advantage of maintaining the reduction during the biological healing process. Although the durability of the reconstruction remains unproven, in our short-term follow-up we observed no loss of reduction and the functional and cosmetic results were uniformly good., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series., ((c) 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)