Search

Background: Patient selection is extremely important in obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) and rectal prolapse (RP) surgery. This study assessed factors that guided the indications for ODS and RP surgery and their specific role in our decision-making process using a machine learning approach., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a long-term prospective observational study on female patients reporting symptoms of ODS who underwent a complete diagnostic workup from January 2010 to December 2021 at an academic tertiary referral center. Clinical, defecographic, and other functional tests data were assessed. A supervised machine learning algorithm using a classification tree model was performed and tested., Results: A total of 400 patients were included. The factors associated with a significantly higher probability of undergoing surgery were follows: as symptoms, perineal splinting, anal or vaginal self-digitations, sensation of external RP, episodes of fecal incontinence and soiling; as physical examination features, evidence of internal and external RP, rectocele, enterocele, or anterior/middle pelvic organs prolapse; as defecographic findings, intra-anal and external RP, rectocele, incomplete rectocele emptying, enterocele, cystocele, and colpo-hysterocele. Surgery was less indicated in patients with dyssynergia, severe anxiety and depression. All these factors were included in a supervised machine learning algorithm. The model showed high accuracy on the test dataset (79%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Symptoms assessment and physical examination proved to be fundamental, but other functional tests should also be considered. By adopting a machine learning model in further ODS and RP centers, indications for surgery could be more easily and reliably identified and shared., (© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Constipation encompasses symptoms of decreased colonic motility or difficulty with the defecation process. As a broad definition, this can be inclusive of functional constipation (FC) or colonic inertia, obstructed defecation (OD), and irritable bowel syndrome-constipation type (IBS-CS). After excluding IBS-C, FC and OD diagnosis and management require a multidisciplinary approach often involving nutritionists, pelvic floor therapists, urogynecologists, and colon and rectal surgeons. Differentiating the presence or absence of each can direct therapy and prognosticate chances for improvement in this often complex combination of disorders., Competing Interests: Disclosure The author has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The remit of this review is confined to the experimental scientific works and surgeries based on the Integral Theory paradigm. The video abstract summarizes the anorectal function, how ligaments cause dysfunction and cure of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation by ligament repair. Anorectal function is reflex and binary, with cortical and peripheral components. The same three oppositely acting reflex muscle forces which open and close the bladder, contract against the pubourethral (PUL) and uterosacral (USL) ligaments: (I) to close the anorectum for continence when the puborectalis muscle (PRM) contracts forwards; (II) to open the anorectum prior to evacuation when the PRM relaxes; (III) to stretch the rectum in opposite directions to support the anorectal stretch receptors "N" to prevent premature activation of the defecation reflex, (fecal urgency). Weak or loose PULs or USLs may cause dysfunction of closure, of evacuation, and inability to control the defecation reflex (fecal urgency). Repair of the PUL and USL can improve or cure these dysfunctions. The perineal body (PB) acts as an anatomical support for the distal vagina, anorectum and external anal sphincter (EAS). It serves as an anchoring point for the forward action of the pubococcygeus muscle (PCM), which tensions the anterior rectal wall during closure and defecation. Bladder and bowel dysfunction have a similar pathogenesis, ligament laxity, mainly pubourethral and uterosacral, with added PB damage for anorectal dysfunction. PB damage can cause obstructive defecation and descending perineal syndrome (DPS). Repair of damaged PUL and USL can restore the closure and evacuation functions of both bladder an anorectum. DPS can be cured by repair of the PB's suspensory ligaments, deep transversus perinei., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-23-1883/coif). The series “Integral Theory Paradigm” was commissioned by the International Society for Pelviperineology without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Fecobionics is a novel integrated technology for assessment of anorectal function. It is a defecatory test with simultaneous measurements of pressures, orientation, and device angle (a proxy of the anorectal angle). Furthermore, the latest Fecobionics prototypes measure diameters (shape) using impedance planimetry during evacuation of the device. The simultaneous measurement of multiple variables in the integrated test allows new metrics to be developed including more advanced novel defecation indices, enabling mechanistic insight in the defecation process at an unprecedented level in patients with anorectal disorders including patients suffering from obstructed defecation, fecal incontinence, and low anterior resection syndrome. The device has the consistency and shape of a normal stool (type 3-4 on the Bristol Stool Form Scale). Fecobionics has been validated on the bench and in animal studies and used in clinical trials to study defecation phenotypes in normal human subjects and patients with obstructed defecation, fecal incontinence, and low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery. Subtypes have been defined, especially of patients with obstructed defecation. Furthermore, Fecobionics has been used to monitor biofeedback therapy in patients with fecal incontinence to predict the outcome of the therapy (responder versus non-responder). Most Fecobionics studies showed a closer correlation to symptoms as compared to current technologies for anorectal assessment. The present article outlines previous and ongoing work, and perspectives for future studies in proctology, including in physiological assessment of function, diagnostics, monitoring of therapy, and as a tool for biofeedback therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Kassab, Gregersen, Sun, Combs and Field have claimed IP rights to the Fecobionics technology. No other conflicts of interest are noted.

Introduction: Obstetric anal sphincter injury is an important risk factor for postpartum fecal incontinence but few studies have reported fecal incontinence occurring, even during pregnancy. The first objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of fecal incontinence, obstructed defecation and vaginal bulging early and late in pregnancy and postpartum. The second objective was to assess the association between symptoms in pregnancy, delivery characteristics, and bowel and vaginal bulging symptoms at 1 year postpartum., Material and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2014 and October 2017, including 898 nulliparous women enrolled with the maternity healthcare service in Örebro County, Sweden. The women responded to questionnaires regarding pelvic floor dysfunction in early and late pregnancy and at 8 weeks and 1 year postpartum. The data were analyzed using random effect logistic models estimating odds ratios (ORs) and generalized linear models estimating relative risks, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: At 1 year postpartum, the prevalence of fecal incontinence, obstructed defecation and vaginal bulging was 6% (40/694), 28% (197/699) and 8% (56/695), respectively. Among women with vaginal delivery, the risk of fecal incontinence and vaginal bulging increased significantly both in late pregnancy, with ORs of 3.4 (95% CI 1.5-7.7) and 3.6 (95% CI 1.6-8.1), respectively, and at 1 year postpartum, with ORs of 5.0 (95% CI 2.1-11.5) and 8.3 (95% CI 3.8-18.1), respectively, compared with early pregnancy. Among all women, factors associated with increased prevalence of fecal incontinence 1 year postpartum were fecal incontinence during pregnancy (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 7.4; 95% CI 4.1-13.3), obstructed defecation during pregnancy (aRR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.9) and concurrent obstructed defecation (aRR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.5)., Conclusions: This prospective study shows an increased risk of fecal incontinence by late pregnancy, suggesting that the pregnancy itself may be involved in the development of postpartum fecal incontinence. Obstructed defecation during pregnancy and postpartum was found to be associated with increased risk of fecal incontinence postpartum, indicating that postpartum fecal incontinence may be a result of incomplete bowel emptying., (© 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).)

Anismus or non-relaxing puborectalis muscle (PRM) on straining may affect over 40% of patients with obstructed defecation (OD). Management is usually with biofeedback, or botulin toxin injection or partial puborectalis muscle myotomy. Such a procedure can be difficult technically. Bleeding and rectal injury may occur when detaching the PRM from the rectum. A partial modification of surgical technique may avoid these complications. The diagnosis should be confirmed with exclusion of sphincter compromise. Through two cutaneous incisions, an Ellis forceps is advanced through the ischio-rectal space, whilst finger pressure per rectum allows the puborectalis to be visualized and grasped by the forceps. Removal of some ischiorectal fat may be necessary to allow division of half the PRM under direct view. From October 2020 to October 2021, 5 patients underwent the modified technique in our department (4 males, median age 43 years [range 34-58 years], median follow-up 6 months [range 2-12 months]). No patients suffered from injury of the rectum or bleeding during or after surgery. Operative time was 30 min less than conventional PRM division, as the time-consuming "blind dissection" of PRM was avoided. Four patients regained appropriate relaxation of the PRM on straining. One male patient had temporary minor anal incontinence for 2 weeks. One male patient with severe mental distress continued to have with anismus and OD after surgery and refused psychiatric support. This modified procedure is feasible and safe and quicker than our conventional technique. More cases with longer follow-up are needed to confirm its efficacy., (© 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Introduction and Hypothesis: Obstructed defecation (OD) is often associated with trauma to pelvic connective tissue and nerves sustained during pregnancy and childbirth. Although there are multiple potential etiologies of defecatory dysfunction, the pathophysiology of this symptom complex is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of parity in the development of obstructed defecatory symptoms in women with normal anorectal anatomy in a search for evidence of a presumptive neuropathic effect of pregnancy and childbirth., Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated the records of 754 women presenting at a tertiary urogynecology unit for pelvic floor dysfunction with no anatomical abnormalities of the anorectum on imaging. They were stratified according to parity. The authors determined the prevalence of obstructed defecation symptoms in these groups. Chi-squared test was performed for statistical analysis., Results: Median age was 51 (range 16-88) years, and median vaginal parity was 2 (0-8); 399 (53%) women reported symptoms of OD. When anatomical abnormalities of the anorectum were excluded, parity did not seem to have a major effect on the prevalence of symptoms of OD., Conclusions: In this cohort, parity is unlikely to be a cause of OD in women with normal anorectal anatomy., (© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between postoperative anxiety/depression and functional outcomes of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) for obstructed defecation (OD). Methods: Patients who received LVR for OD between March 2014 and July 2020 were enrolled. Patient demographics were recorded before surgery. The validated Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) were evaluated to assess functional outcomes and QoL, respectively. The self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale were used to measure anxiety and depression, respectively. Results: Twenty-five patients were recruited. Significant improvement was found at last available follow-up (LAFU) in CCCS ( P  = .001), and three PAC-QoL subsets, physical discomfort ( P  = .003), satisfaction ( P  = .014), and worries/concerns ( P  = .033) during follow-up of 60 (11-84) months. In the patients with anxiety/depression ( n  = 11), significant improvement was found at LAFU in CCCS ( P  = .024) and the PAC-QoL subset, psychosocial discomfort ( P  = .038). In the patients without anxiety/depression ( n  = 14), improvement was found in CCCS ( P  = .009) and the PAC-QoL subset, physical discomfort ( P  = .018). Conclusion: The long-term functional outcomes of LVR for OD in patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities are not undermined by postoperative anxiety/depression.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare patients' mid-term functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes following robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR)., Methods: The data of consecutive female patients who underwent minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for external or symptomatic internal rectal prolapse at 3 hospitals in Finland between January 2011 and December 2016 were retrospectively collected. Patients were matched by age and diagnosis at a 1:1 ratio. A disease-related symptom questionnaire was sent to all living patients at follow-up in July 2018., Results: After a total of 401 patients (RVMR, n = 187; LVMR, n = 214) were matched, 152 patients in each group were included in the final analyses. The median follow-up times were 3.3 (range 1.6-7.4) years and 3.0 (range 1.6-7.6) years for the RVMR and LVMR groups, respectively. The postoperative QoL measures did not differ between the groups. Compared with the LVMR group, the RVMR group had lower postoperative Wexner Incontinence Score (median 5 vs. median 8; p < 0.001), experienced significant ongoing incontinence symptoms less often (30.6% vs. 49.0%; p < 0.001) and reported less postoperative faecal incontinence discomfort evaluated with the visual analogue scale (median 11 vs. median 39; p = 0.005). RVMR patients had a shorter hospital stay (2.2 days vs. 3.8 days; p < 0.001) but experienced more frequent de novo pelvic pain (31.8% vs. 11.8%; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: RVMR and LVMR patients had equal functional and QoL outcomes. Those who underwent RVMR had lower mid-term anal incontinence symptom scores but suffered more frequent de novo pelvic pain., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction and Hypothesis: The primary aim of this study was to assess for an association between maximal intra-abdominal pressure reached on Valsalva (MAP) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on subjective, clinical and sonographic evaluation. Another objective was to test for association between MAP and body mass index (BMI)., Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 504 archived datasets of women seen for pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms between January 2017 to September 2019 at a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. Patients underwent a standardized interview including use of visual analogue scores (VAS) to evaluate bother of pelvic floor symptoms, examination using the International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (ICS POP-Q), dual-channel filling and voiding cystometry, test for MAP as well as four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound. Analysis of ultrasound volumes for pelvic organ descent was performed blinded against all other data., Results: There was a weak but significant association between MAP and sonographic rectal ampulla descent (p = 0.0275). There was also a significant association between MAP and bother of obstructed defecation symptoms (p = 0.0065). Symptomatic, clinical and sonographic POP in the anterior or the apical compartments was not significantly associated with MAP. On multivariate analysis, the association between MAP and rectal descent remained significant (p = 0.01). There was no significant association between BMI and MAP., Conclusions: This cross-sectional study showed an association between MAP and posterior compartment prolapse on imaging as well as between MAP and the bother score of obstructed defecation symptoms. There was no association between BMI and MAP., (© 2021. Crown.)

Normal defecation is a complex and coordinated physiologic process that involves the rectum, anus, anal sphincter complex, and pelvic floor muscles. Any alteration of this process can be considered defecatory dysfunction, a term that covers a broad range of disorders, including slow-transit constipation, functional constipation, and functional or anatomic outlet obstruction. Evaluation should include history, physical, and consideration of additional testing such as colonoscopy, colonic transit studies, defecography, and/or anorectal manometry. Depending on the etiology, management options can include conservative measures such as dietary or lifestyle modifications, medications, pelvic floor physical therapy, or surgical repair., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Hypothesis: Symptoms of obstructed defecation (OD) and anatomical abnormalities of the posterior compartment are prevalent in urogynecological patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether perineal hypermobility is an independent predictor of OD, as is the case for rectocele, enterocele and rectal intussusception., Methods: This is a retrospective study of 2447 women attending a tertiary urodynamic center between September 2011 and December 2016. The assessment included a structured interview, urodynamic testing, a clinical examination and 4D transperineal ultrasound. After exclusion of previous pelvic floor surgery and defined anatomical abnormalities of the anorectum, 796 patients were left for analysis. Perineal hypermobility was defined as rectal descent ≥ 15 mm below the symphysis pubis, determined in stored ultrasound volume datasets offline, using proprietary software, blinded to all other data. Any association between perineal hypermobility and symptoms of obstructed defecation was tested for by chi-square (X 2 ) test., Results: For the 796 patients analyzed, median age was 52 (range, 16-88) years with a mean BMI of 27 (range, 15-64) kg/m 2 . Average vaginal parity was two (range, 0-8). Reported OD symptoms in this group included sensation of incomplete emptying in 335 (42%), straining at stool in 300 (37%) and digitation in 83 (10%). At least one of those symptoms was reported by 424 (53%) women; 153 showed perineal hypermobility. There was no significant association between perineal hypermobility and OD symptoms on univariate testing., Conclusions: We found no evidence of an independent association between perineal hypermobility and obstructed defecation., (© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Background: Biofeedback is the most widespread rehabilitative therapy for the treatment of anismus after failed conservative treatment. Osteopathy represents an alternative therapy for constipation. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of osteopathic treatment as compared to biofeedback in patients with dyssynergic defecation., Methods: This was a prospective cohort pilot study on 30 patients with dyssynergic defecation enrolled at the Colorectal Clinic of the University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy, from May 2015 to May 2016 and followed until May 2020. Dyssynergic defecation was defined as the inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor or less than 20% relaxation of basal resting sphincter pressure (on anal manometry) with adequate propulsive forces during attempted defecation. Dyssynergic patients were divide into 2 treatment groups: 15 patients had osteopathy and 15 patients had biofeedback. Before and 3 months after rehabilitation treatment, all patients had anorectal manometry, defecography, and ultrasound, and were evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) constipation score, obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score, Colo-rectal-anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8), Colo-rectal-anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7), and the Brusciano Score (BS). To evaluate the efficacy of osteopathy and biofeedback in the long-term, all patients completed the above-mentioned questionnaires 5 years later via a telephone interview., Results: The two treatments were similarly effective in the short term with reduction in questionnaires scores, and increase in the percentage of anal sphincter release at straining at anorectal manometry in both groups. The ODS score was significantly reduced in biofeedback group (p = 0.021). The 3-month post-treatment BS was lower in the osteopathy group, but this just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.050). Periodic rehabilitation reinforcements were provided. The CCF constipation score decreased significantly in the osteopathy group (p = 0.023) after 5 years., Conclusions: Osteopathy is a promising treatment for dyssynergic defecation, and it can be associated with biofeedback.

Background: The sampling reflex is necessary to begin defecation or flatulence. It consists of a simultaneous rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) mediated by relaxation of the internal anal sphincter and rectoanal excitatory reflex (RAER) mediated by contraction of the external anal sphincter. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sampling reflex in patients with functional defecation disorder (FDD)., Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 58 obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) patients with FDD. All 58 patients and 20 controls were evaluated with anorectal manometry to study the sampling reflex. Quantitative RAIR (total duration of reflex; maximal amplitude of relaxation; residual pressure at the lowest point of the RAIR) and RAER data (maximal amplitude of contraction; duration) were obtained. The straining test on manometry was considered positive for FDD if there was a muscle contraction/lack of relaxation or an insufficient pressure gradient for the passage of feces. Defecography was performed on all the patients with assessment of the anorectal angle and persistence or increase of puborectalis indentation., Results: Fifty (86.2%) FDD patients had an altered sampling reflex, showing incomplete/short duration of RAIR and excessive contraction/duration of RAER. More specifically, there was a correlation between a positive straining test and a short total duration of RAIR (ρ 0.92) as well as with excessive duration of RAER (ρ 0.89). There was also a correlation between lack of muscle relaxation on defecography and short total duration of RAIR ((ρ 0.79) and between lack of muscle relaxation on defecography and excessive duration of RAER (ρ 0.83). Altered maximal amplitude relaxation had the highest sensitivity in detecting impairment of RAIR (87.9) while maximal amplitude contraction had the highest sensitivity in detecting impairment of RAER (89.6). High residual pressure at the lowest point of RAIR had the highest specificity in detecting impairment of RAIR (80.0) while RAER duration had the highest specificity in detecting impairment of RAER (77.7)., Conclusion: The sampling reflex is impaired in patients with FDD. This finding provides an important insight into the pathogenesis of obstructed functional defecation.

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between rectal-vaginal pressure and symptomatic rectocele in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)., Method: Patients with posterior vaginal prolapse staged III or IV in accordance with the POP Quantitation classification method who were scheduled for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery in the years 2016-2019 were included in the study. Rectocele was diagnosed using translabial ultrasound, and obstructed defecation (OD) was diagnosed in accordance with the Roma IV diagnostic criteria. Both rectal and vaginal pressure were measured using peritron manometers at maximum Vasalva. To ensure stability, the test was performed three times with each patient., Results: A total of 217 patients were enrolled in this study. True rectocele was diagnosed in 68 patients at a main rectal ampulla depth of 19 mm. Furthermore, 36 patients were diagnosed with OD. Symptomatic rectocele was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.01), a higher OD symptom score (p < 0.001), and a lower grade of apical prolapse (p < 0.001). The rectal-vaginal pressure gradient was higher in patients with symptomatic rectocele (37.4 ± 11.7 cm H 2 O) compared with patients with asymptomatic rectocele (16.9 ± 8.4 cm H 2 O, p < 0.001), and patients without rectocele (17.1 ± 9.2 cm H 2 O, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The rectal-vaginal pressure gradient was found to be a risk factor for symptomatic rectocele in patients with POP. A rectal-vaginal pressure gradient of > 27.5 cm H 2 O was suggested as the cut-off point of the elevated pressure gradient.

Whether used as the primary diagnostic test or reserved as a problem-solving examination, fluoroscopic defecography (FD) remains an important tool in the workup and treatment of defecatory disorders. FD is a well-established, simple, and rapid examination that most closely resembles the actual process and position that a patient uses to enable defecation and provides both qualitative and quantitative information on the defecatory process. FD is indicated when re-creating the act of defecation is necessary, especially in patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation and where symptoms do not correlate with prior examinations such as MRI. Also, FD may help the patient understand the severity of their condition, better informing them of the structural and functional pathology, and aid in discussions with the surgeon regarding plans for treating their complex pelvic floor and defecatory problems. This review provides an up-to-date, comprehensive summary of FD and describes the indications for, techniques of, and common pathology encountered.

Background: Functional constipation (FC) is a common pediatric healthcare problem worldwide. Obstructed defection syndrome (ODS) is frequently presented with an inability to coordinate the bowel movement with pelvic floor muscles. Botulinum toxin (BT) intraanal sphincteric injection can improve the obstructed defecation by relaxing the anal sphincter and reducing the required force to propel the stools., Purpose: This study aimed to compare the changes in Rintala scores (as a mean of assessing defecatory function), in children with FC and ODS, managed by BT injection, bowel management program (BMP), and senna based laxatives (SBL), versus a control group managed by BMP and SBL only., Methods: Prospective randomized controlled study, started at December 2017 on 40 pediatric patients, divided into 2 equal groups (group A: managed by BMP and SBL, group B: like group A with once intraanal sphincteric BT injection) suffering from FC, ODS, with contrast enema showing persistence of ≤90 rectoanal angle (RAA) even with trials of defecation. Patients were excluded if they have neuromuscular abnormalities, hypothyroidism, previous colorectal or anal surgery. Rintala score was assessed before treatment, at 2 months, and 6 months after management., Results: The study included 18 females (45%) and 22 males (55%). Group A had equal gender distribution and mean age of 6.9 years, while group B had 12 males with mean age of 7.35 years. The mean follow up period was 11.35 months in group A and 11.6 months in group B. Mean Rintala scores of both groups at initial presentation, 2 months and 6 months follow up were: group A: 9.10, 9.40, 10.90; group B: 9.30, 10.70, 11.05 respectively, and showed no statistically significant difference (p value: 0.884, 0.294, 0.923 respectively). No complications were detected from BT injection like allergic reactions, neuromuscular urinary or lower limbs disturbances., Conclusion: Intraanal sphincteric injection of botulinum toxin by the mentioned technique and dose, did not result in additional defecatory functional improvement (when assessed by Rintala score) over the routine protocol (using bowel management program and laxatives) of managing functional constipation with obstructed defecation. ANNOUNCEMENT: a preliminary report of this work was presented in the 34th Egyptian pediatric surgery association (EPSA) meeting in Cairo in November 2019., Type of Study: Treatment/prospective study., Level of Evidence: Level I., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Little is known about the pathophysiological mechanisms of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS)., Aims: We aim to identify the different phenotypes, taking into account complaints, anatomy and anorectal physiology., Methods: Complaints, endoscopy results, and physiology data of patients with histologically proven SRUS were collected and analysed. The associated anorectal diseases were faecal incontinence and obstructed defecation. The clinical aspects of SRUS were compared, and factors associated with anorectal diseases were identified., Results: Overall, 102 consecutive patients were included. The predominant lesion was a rectal ulcer (66%), and inflammation of the rectal wall was present in 42% of patients. Abnormal rectal capacities and/or rectal perception was observed in more than half. Nearly half (52%) of the patients met the criteria for obstructed defecation and they tended to more frequently have psychiatric disease (66.7% vs 33.3%; p=0.07). Patients with faecal incontinence (17%) reported more self-perception of anal procidentia (p=0.01) and were more likely to have inflammation of the rectal wall (p=0.02), high-grade internal rectal procidentia (p=0.06) and anal hypotonia (p=0.004); their maximum tolerable volume was lower (p=0.004)., Conclusion: The characteristics of patients with SRUS suggest different phenotypes. This may be a way to develop a comprehensive treatment strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Hypothesis: The objective was to determine whether levator contraction during Valsalva (i.e. levator co-activation), as visualised on four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (4D-TLUS), is associated with obstructed defecation (OD)., Methods: This was a retrospective study including patients attending a tertiary urogynecological unit. All underwent an interview, clinical examination and 4D-TLUS. Frequent straining at stool, digitation or sensation of incomplete emptying during defecation were considered symptoms of OD. Archived 4D-TLUS volumes were evaluated, blinded to all other data. Hiatal anteroposterior (AP) diameter (cm) and hiatal area (cm 2 ) were measured at rest and on maximal Valsalva. Patients with anatomical explanations for OD (rectocele, enterocele and/or rectal intussusception) were excluded. Reduction of hiatal AP diameter and hiatal area on Valsalva were tested for association with symptoms of OD., Results: Overall, 1,383 women attended the unit from May 2013 to July 2016. Seven hundred and eight were excluded because of rectocele (n = 645), enterocele (n = 116) or rectal intussusception (n = 41) and 10 owing to missing data, leaving 665. Mean age was 53 years (16-89), mean body mass index (BMI) 27.3 kg/m 2 (15.7-64.4). OD symptoms were reported by 368 (55.3%) patients. On imaging, a reduction in hiatal AP diameter on Valsalva was seen in 11.7% cases (78 out of 665) with a mean reduction of 3.5 mm (0.2-17). A mean reduction in hiatal area of 1.9cm 2 (0.03-14.8) on Valsalva was seen in 9.8% cases (65 out of 665). These sonographic measures of levator co-activation were not associated with OD symptoms or bother caused by them (p > 0.05)., Conclusions: Levator co-activation seen on TLUS is not associated with obstructed defecation.

Purpose: To assess the subjective and objective outcomes of combined stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) and urogynecological surgery to treat pelvic organ prolapse, with a 10-year follow-up., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing prospectively collected data from 53 consecutive patients who underwent combined stapled transanal rectal resection and urogynecological surgery, from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007 at a tertiary referral Pelvic Floor Unit of an Italian hospital., Results: Fifty-three patients with a median age of 60 years (interquartile range (IQR) 67-52t), underwent STARR and concomitant urogynecological surgery. No serious postoperative complications were recorded, and 37/53 women (70%) were evaluated at the 10-year follow-up visit. The cure rate was optimal in 34 women (64.1%). Regarding persistent and/or recurrent symptoms, five sexually-active patients (9%) reported dyspareunia only; obstructed defecation symptoms recurred in ten women (19%); urinary incontinence occurred in eight patients (15%); four patients (11%) reported persistent perineal pain; and two patients (5%) experienced both the urge to defecate and voiding dysfunction. At the 10-year follow-up, 14/27 patients (52%) stated that they would undergo the same operation again, if necessary. Furthermore, the survey found that patients would recommend the combined surgery., Conclusion: The 10-year results of this study proved that combined rectal and urogynecological surgery is well tolerated, associated with low morbidity, and more effectively treats a distressing and debilitating condition vs separate surgeries for rectal and pelvic organ prolapse. We recommend complementing the relatively small scale of this study with randomized trials involving a sufficient number of patients, to provide more conclusive evidence on the cumulative long-term effects of combined surgery vs 2- or 3-stage surgery.

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a dynamic disorder that affects the entire pelvic diaphragm. POP may often involve multiple organs. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the gold standard to treat female anterior and apical prolapse. Abdominal ventral mesh rectopexy has gained increasing acceptance as an effective treatment for rectal prolapse. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety, feasibility and 1-year outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as a combined treatment of multicompartment POP., Methods: All female patients at our institution with anterior and apical prolapse with symptoms of obstructed defecation were examined by an urogynecologist and a colorectal surgeon, and were judged suitable for the study. Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system stage III and IV and concomitant rectal prolapse were treated by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy. After surgery, 1- and 12-month follow-up was performed and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' symptoms were evaluated using the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Wexner-Agachan constipation score., Results: A total of 98 patients underwent surgery. No intraoperative or postoperative morbidity occurred. At the time of follow-up, all women expressed great satisfaction with the surgical treatment: all the patients had at most POP-Q Stage 1 and 78.8% had a Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score < 3. Significant improvement of symptoms related to POP and to obstructed defecation syndrome, as shown by the FSDS, PISQ-12, and Wexner-Agachan constipation score, was observed in all patients at follow-up CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with ventral rectopexy is a feasible and safe procedure for the combined surgical management of anterior, apical, and posterior prolapse, and provides excellent objective and subjective outcomes.

Introduction and Hypothesis: Obstructed defecation symptoms (ODS) are common in women; however, the key underlying anatomic factors remain poorly understood. We investigated rectal mobility and support defects in women with and without ODS using pelvic floor ultrasound and MR defecography., Methods: This prospective case-control study categorized subjects based on questions 7, 8 and 14 on the PFDI-20, which asks about obstructed defecation symptoms. All subjects underwent an interview, examination and pelvic floor ultrasound, and a subset of 16 subjects underwent MR defecography. The cul de sac-to-anorectal junction distance at rest and during maximum strain was measured on ultrasound and MRI images. The 'compression ratio' was calculated by dividing the change in rectovaginal septum length by its rest length to quantify rectal folding and hypermobility during dynamic imaging and to correlate with ODS., Results: Sixty-two women were recruited, 32 cases and 30 controls. There were no statistically significant differences in age, parity, BMI or stage of rectocele between groups. A threshold analysis indicated the risk of ODS was 32 times greater (OR 32.5, 95% CI 4.8-217.1, p = 0.0003) among women with a high compression ratio (≥ 14) compared with those with a low compression ratio (< 14) after controlling for age, BMI, parity, stool type and BM frequency., Conclusions: Female ODS are associated with distinct alterations in rectal mobility and support that can be clearly observed on dynamic ultrasound. The defects in rectal support were quantifiable using a compression ratio metric, and these defects strongly predicted the likelihood of symptoms; interestingly, the presence or degree of rectocele defects played no role. These findings may provide new insight into the anatomic factors underlying female ODS.

Background: Defecation symptoms are common among women with pelvic organ prolapse. However, the relationship between posterior vaginal wall prolapse and defecation symptoms remains debatable. Even though there is a plausible biomechanical rationale for posterior wall prolapse to cause obstructed defecation, previous studies have drawn contradictory conclusions regarding the association., Objective: We aimed to examine the association between posterior vaginal wall prolapse and defecation symptoms by assessing the following: (1) does prevalence of defecation symptoms increase along with posterior wall prolapse severity, (2) is postoperative symptom improvement greater in women who underwent posterior compartment procedures in comparison with those who did not, and (3) is symptom improvement related to the symptom's correlation with the degree of prolapse?, Study Design: We used data from a nationwide longitudinal cohort study with 3515 women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. We measured the prevalence of 9 defecation symptoms at baseline and at 6 and 24 months after surgery using the short form of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. Baseline degree of prolapse was categorized in stages as defined by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System. The relationship between the degree of posterior wall prolapse and prevalence of bothersome defecation symptoms was studied with logistic regression and adjusted for patient characteristics and severity of anterior wall and apical prolapse. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the longitudinal change in symptom prevalence in groups of participants with and without repair for posterior vaginal compartment. Correlations between symptom improvement and symptom dependency on the degree of prolapse was assessed by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient., Results: The stage of posterior wall prolapse (stage 2 vs stage 0) correlated with splinting, straining, incomplete evacuation, fecal incontinence of liquid stool, pain during defecation, fecal urgency, and anorectal prolapse (adjusted odds ratios, 2.7, 2.1, 2.0, 1.5, 2.1, 1.4, and 2.2, respectively; P ≤ .007 for all). Flatal incontinence and fecal incontinence of solid stool were not associated with the severity of posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstructed defecation symptoms (splinting, straining, and incomplete evacuation) improved more in women undergoing posterior compartment surgery compared with women undergoing repair for other compartments. The greatest improvement at follow-up was observed for those symptoms that showed strongest association with the degree of prolapse at baseline., Conclusion: Obstructed defecation symptoms are dependent on the posterior wall anatomy. Women presenting with posterior wall prolapse, and these symptoms can expect to improve after surgery. Other defecation symptoms also improve after pelvic organ prolapse surgery, but they are not as specific to posterior wall anatomy as obstructed defecation symptoms., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Hypothesis: Our primary objective was to describe long-term outcomes after posterior colporrhaphy with and without mesh augmentation., Methods: This was a retrospective study including 93 patients after posterior colporrhaphy (native tissue in 39 and synthetic mesh augmented in 54). The indication was symptoms of prolapse with clinical posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Mesh augmentation and concomitant prolapse operations were performed at the surgeon's discretion. Patients underwent interview, clinical examination and 4D pelvic floor ultrasound. Imaging analysis was done with the reviewer blinded against all other data. Generalized linear modeling was used to compare groups with logistic regression for binary and linear regression for continuous outcomes., Results: Patients were seen on average 5.3 years after surgery and described persistent symptoms of prolapse in 32% and of obstructed defecation in 33%. Clinical recurrence (Bp ≥ -1) was seen in 20%, while sonographic recurrence (rectal ampulla descent to ≥ 15 mm below the symphysis pubis) was noted in 12%. A true rectocele was diagnosed in 33% of patients. No major differences in outcomes were found between those who underwent native tissue and those who had a mesh-augmented repair., Conclusions: Mesh augmentation was not superior to native tissue posterior colporrhaphy, and both were only moderately effective in eliminating a true rectocele and symptoms of obstructed defecation 5 years after reconstructive surgery.

Introduction and Hypothesis: Several posterior compartment surgical approaches are used to address posterior vaginal wall prolapse and obstructed defecation. We aimed to compare outcomes for both conditions among different surgical approaches., Methods: A systematic review was performed comparing the impact of surgical interventions in the posterior compartment on prolapse and defecatory symptoms. MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 4 April 2018. Randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective comparative and single-group studies of women undergoing posterior vaginal compartment surgery for vaginal bulge or bowel symptoms were included. Studies had to include both anatomical and symptom outcomes both pre- and post-surgery., Results: Forty-six eligible studies reported on six surgery types. Prolapse and defecatory symptoms improved with native-tissue transvaginal rectocele repair, transanal rectocele repair, and stapled transanal rectocele repair (STARR) surgeries. Although prolapse was improved with sacrocolpoperineopexy, defecatory symptoms worsened. STARR caused high rates of fecal urgency postoperatively, but this symptom typically resolved with time. Site-specific posterior repairs improved prolapse stage and symptoms of obstructed defecation. Compared with the transanal route, native-tissue transvaginal repair resulted in greater improvement in anatomical outcomes, improved obstructed defecation symptoms, and lower chances of rectal injury, but higher rates of dyspareunia., Conclusions: Surgery in the posterior vaginal compartment typically has a high rate of success for anatomical outcomes, obstructed defecation, and bulge symptoms, although these may not persist over time. Based on this evidence, to improve anatomical and symptomatic outcomes, a native-tissue transvaginal rectocele repair should be preferentially performed.

Aim: To evaluate the reason for failure of STARR (stapled transanal rectal resection) operation for obstructed defecation., Methods: A retrospective study (June 2012-December 2017) was performed using a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent STARR operation for ODS (obstructed defecation syndrome), complaining of persisting or de novo occurrence of pelvic floor dysfunctions. Postoperative St Mark's and ODS scores were evaluated. A VAS was used to score pelvic pain. Patients' satisfaction was estimated administering the CPGAS (clinical patient grading assessment scale) questionnaire. Objective evaluation was performed by dynamic proctography and anorectal manometry., Results: Ninety patients (83.3% females) operated for ODS using STARR technique were evaluated. Median ODS score was 19 while 20 patients (22%) reported de novo fecal urgency and 4 patients a worsening of their preoperative fecal incontinence. Dynamic proctography performed in 54/90 patients showed a significant (> 3.0 cm) rectocele in 19 patients, recto-rectal intussusception in 10 patients incomplete emptying in 24 patients. When compared with internal normal standards, anorectal manometry showed decreased rectal compliance and maximum tolerable volume in patients with urgency. Nine patients reported a persistent postoperative pelvic pain (median VAS score 6)., Conclusion: Failure of STARR to treat ODS, documented by persisting ODS symptoms, fecal urgency, or chronic pelvic pain, is often justified by the persistence or de novo onset of alteration of the anorectal anatomy at defecation. This occurs in about half of the patients, but in 40% of the cases who complained of incomplete emptying or incontinence, anatomical abnormalities were not recognized.

Purpose: Although various strategies exist for chronic constipation therapy, the pathogenesis of chronic constipation is still not completely understood. The aim of this exploratory experimental study is to elucidate alterations of the autonomous enteric nervous system at the molecular level in patients with obstructed defecation, who represent one of the most predominant groups of constipated patients., Methods: Full-thickness rectal wall samples of patients with obstructed defecation were analyzed and compared with controls. Differential gene expression analyses by RNA-Seq transcriptome profiling were performed and gene expression profiles were assigned to gene ontology pathways by application of different biological libraries., Results: Analysis of the transcriptome showed that genes associated with the enteric nervous system functions were significantly downregulated in patients with obstructed defecation. These affected functions included developmental processes and synaptic transmission., Conclusions: Our results therefore indicate that obstructed defecation may represent an enteric neuropathy, comparable to Hirschsprung disease and slow-transit constipation.

Objectives: To assess the extents of pelvic floor descent both during the maximal straining phase and the defecation phase in healthy volunteers and in patients with pelvic floor disorders, studied with MR defecography (MRD), and to define specific threshold values for pelvic floor descent during the defecation phase., Material and Methods: Twenty-two patients (mean age 51 ± 19.4) with obstructed defecation and 20 healthy volunteers (mean age 33.4 ± 11.5) underwent 3.0T MRD in supine position using midsagittal T2-weighted images. Two radiologists performed measurements in reference to PCL-lines in straining and during defecation. In order to identify cutoff values of pelvic floor measurements for diagnosis of pathologic pelvic floor descent [anterior, middle, and posterior compartments (AC, MC, PC)], receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted., Results: Pelvic floor descent of all three compartments was significantly larger during defecation than at straining in patients and healthy volunteers (p < 0.002). When grading pelvic floor descent in the straining phase, only two healthy volunteers showed moderate PC descent (10%), which is considered pathologic. However, when applying the grading system during defecation, PC descent was overestimated with 50% of the healthy volunteers (10 of 20) showing moderate PC descent. The AUC for PC measurements during defecation was 0.77 (p = 0.003) and suggests a cutoff value of 45 mm below the PCL to identify patients with pathologic PC descent. With the adapted cutoff, only 15% of healthy volunteers show pathologic PC descent during defecation., Conclusion: MRD measurements during straining and defecation can be used to differentiate patients with pelvic floor dysfunction from healthy volunteers. However, different cutoff values should be used during straining and during defecation to define normal or pathologic PC descent.

Background/objective: In the late's 90' a new surgical treatment, the stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) was born to treat obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). In this study we retrospectively analyze a series of 450 cases that underwent STARR in 10 years., Methods: Between January 2001 to December 2011, 450 patients, diagnosed with ODS syndrome caused by rectocele or intussusception, underwent to STARR procedure. The presence of rectocele and/or intussusception was verified by dynamic defecography. The preoperative evaluation was completed with anorectal manometry and colonoscopy. Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 1 years, 3 years and 5 years after surgery., Results: Mean operative time was 30,2 min. In 408 cases (90.7%) hospital discharge occurred 24 hours after surgery. Among postoperative complications urinary retention was observed in 35 patients (7.8%). Five (1.1%) patients presented an early rectal bleeding and 8 (1.8%) patients presented a late bleeding. In 5 (1.1%) patients a stable pelvic hematoma was found. Six (1.3%) patients presented pelvic sepsis due to subperitoneal perforation. An asymptomatic partial dehiscence of stapler row occurred in 19 patients (4.2%).125 patients (27.8%) reported defecation urgency that completely vanished at 3 months follow-up in 83 patients (66,4%) and in further 42 patients (33,6%) at 6-months. The average preoperative ODS score was 14.1; 3.1 at one year; 4.3 at 3 years and 6.4 after five years., Conclusions: In expert hands, with right indications, STARR procedure is safe with good results in terms of improvement of the ODS score., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)

A randomized study was carried out to compare the mid-term outcome of transanal rectal resection with the CCS-30 TRANSTAR and two TST36 staplers in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. After selection, patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups:104 underwent a TRANSTAR operation and 104 a transanal rectal resection with two TST36 staplers. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, and defecography. Cumulative complication rate was significantly higher in TRANSTAR operation (P = 0.019). All symptoms and defecographic parameters significantly improved (P < 0.001), without differences. Costs were significantly lower with double TST (P = 0.035). Recurrence rates were 6.2% in TRANSTAR group and 11.4% with double TST (P = 0.206). Two circular TST 36 staplers consent to obtain the same clinical and functional results than the CCS-30, with significantly lower complication rate and costs., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Electrogastrography (EGG) is a noninvasive technique for recording gastric myoelectric activity. The aim of this study was to measure and record gastric myoelectric activity in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) and to compare their results with those of normal individuals., Methods: Forty-two patients (22 male) with ODS and a mean age of 41.02 y were enrolled in this prospective study after thorough clinical and physiologic assessment. Eleven normal subjects (six female) with a mean age of 39.2 ± 8.4 y were assigned to the control group. Both patients and controls were subjected to surface EGG in fasting and postprandial states. Data were recorded and analyzed via a computer system to reveal the EGG pattern in both groups., Results: Abnormalities in the EGG were found in 24 (57.1%) of the 42 patients with ODS. EGG in ODS patients showed alterations in the fasting state in the form of a significant decrease of the normal gastric slow wave (P = 0.03) and a nonsignificant increase in gastric dysrhythmias. The EGG alterations of ODS patients were significantly improved in the postprandial state as the normal gastric slow waves significantly (P = 0.006) increased and the gastric bradycardia declined significantly (P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed in the power distribution between the ODS patients and the healthy controls., Conclusions: Patients with ODS showed an altered EGG pattern compared with that of healthy control subjects. The alterations in ODS patients were more clearly observed during the fasting state and improved significantly after eating., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Rectoanal intussusception (RAI) is a common finding on defecography in patients with defecation disorders. This study aimed to compare the proctographic findings and symptoms between patients with anterior RAI and those with circular RAI., Methods: We included 208 patients who were diagnosed as having RAI on defecography. Anorectal function was evaluated using Constipation Scoring System (CSS) and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)., Results: Twenty-four patients had anterior RAI and 184 had circular RAI. While the anterior intussusception descent or pelvic floor descent was significantly smaller in patients with anterior RAI than those with circular RAI [14.3 vs. 18.5 mm, p =0.004; 12.4 vs. 21.6 mm, p =0.005], there were no significant differences in incidences of obstructed defecation (OD) and fecal incontinence (FI) between the groups. Sixteen patients with anterior RAI and 137 patients with circular RAI had OD. There was no significant difference in the CSS scores between the groups. Twelve patients with anterior RAI and 108 patients with circular RAI had FI. No significant difference in the FISI scores between the groups., Conclusions: Approximately one tenth of the whole RAI was anterior in location, and symptoms in patients with anterior RAI were similar to those with circular RAI., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2017 by The Japan Society of Coloproctology.)

Background: In recent years, stapled transanal resection (STARR) has been adopted worldwide with convincing short-term results. However, due to the high recurrence rate and some major complications after STARR, there is still controversy about when the procedure is indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of STARR performed with a new dedicated device for tailored transanal stapled surgery., Methods: All the consecutive patients affected by obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) due to rectocele or/and rectal intussusception, who underwent STARR with the TST STARR-Plus stapler, were included in a prospective study. Pain, Cleveland Clinic Score for Constipation (CCCS) and incontinence, patient satisfaction, number of hemostatic stitches, operative time, hospital stay and perioperative complications were recorded. Postoperative complications and recurrence were also reported., Results: Forty-five consecutive patients (median age 50; range 24-79) were included in the study. Median resected volume was 15 cm 3 (range 12-19 cm 3 ) with a median height of surgical specimen of 5.6 cm (range 4.5-10 cm). The mean CCCS decreased from 17.26 (± 3.77) to 5.42 (± 2.78) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction grade was excellent in 14 patients (31.1%), good in 25 (55.5%), sufficient in three (6.7%) and poor in three patients (6.7%). No major complications occurred. Five patients (11%) reported urgency after 30 days and two patients (4%) after 12 months. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence score did not significantly change. At a median follow-up of 23 months (range 12-30 months), only three patients (6.7%) reported recurrent symptoms of obstructed defecation comparable to those reported at baseline., Conclusions: TST STARR-Plus seems to be safe and effective for the treatment of ODS due to rectocele and rectal intussusception, and technical improvement could reduce the risk of some complications. However, careful patient selection is still the best means of preventing complications.

Aim: As laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) gained increasing popularity in the past decade, studies from non-western area remain rare. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LVR for obstructed defecation (OD) in Chinese patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities., Methods: A series of 19 consecutive patients is presented undergoing LVR for OD. All patients showed various forms of pelvic structural abnormalities which were verified by dynamic defecography exam. Data was prospectively recorded and the functional outcomes were evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL)., Results: Pelvic structural abnormalities of the 19 patients included external rectal prolapse (ER) in 10.5% (2/19), high grade internal rectal prolapse (IR) in 57.8% (11/19), rectocele in 52.6% (10/19), enterocele in 15.7% (3/19), cystocele/vaginal prolapse in 15.7 (3/19), descending perineum (DP) in 63.5% (12/19). 89.4% patients (17/19) showed at least two co-existed abnormalities and 15.7% (3/19) showed multicompartmental abnormalities. The mean follow-up was 9 months (range 1-18). No mesh-related complication was observed. At last available follow-up (LAFU), improvement of OD symptom was observed in 15 (78.9%) patients, the mean scores of CCCS decreased from 17 to 10 (p < 0.05), all four subsets of PAC-QoL scores improved, and three of them (physical discomfort, worries and concerns, satisfaction) showed statistical significance (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy appears to be a safe and effective procedure for obstructed defecation in Chinese patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities in short-term follow-up.

Introduction and Hypothesis: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of digital rectal examination in the identification of a true rectocele., Methods: This is a retrospective observational study utilising 187 archived data sets of women presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms and/or pelvic organ prolapse between August 2012 and November 2013. Evaluation included a standardised interview, ICS-POPQ, rectal examination and 4D translabial ultrasound. The main outcome measure was the diagnosis of rectocele by digital rectal palpation on Valsalva manoeuvre. This diagnosis correlated with the sonographic diagnosis of rectocele to determine agreement between digital examination and ultrasound findings., Results: Complete data sets were available for 180 participants. On imaging, the mean position of the rectal ampulla was 11.07 (-36.3 to 44.3) mm below the symphysis pubis; 42.8% (77) had a rectocele of a depth of ≥10 mm. On palpation, a rectocele was detected in 60 women (33%). Agreement between palpation and imaging was observed in 77%; the kappa was 0.52 (CI 0.39-0.65). On receiver operator characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.854 for the relationship between rectocele pocket depth and the detection of rectocele on palpation., Conclusion: Moderate agreement was found between digital rectal examination for rectocele and translabial ultrasound findings of a "true rectocele". Digital rectal examination may be used to identify these defects in clinical practice. Extending the clinical examination of prolapse to include rectal examination to palpate defects in the rectovaginal septum may reduce the need for defecatory proctograms for the assessment of obstructive defecation and may help triage patients in the management of posterior compartment prolapse.

Introduction: To investigate whether MR-defecography can be employed in sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury (SCI) subjects as a potential diagnostic tool to detect defecational disorders associated with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) using standard parameters for obstructed defecation., Material and Methods: In a prospective single centre clinical trial, we developed MR-defecography in traumatic sensorimotor complete paraplegic SCI patients with upper motoneuron type injury (neurological level of injury T1 to T10) using a conventional 3T scanner. Defecation was successfully induced by eliciting the defecational reflex after rectal filling with ultrasonic gel, application of two lecicarbon suppositories and digital rectal stimulation. Examination was performed with patients in left lateral decubitus position using T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence in the sagittal plane at rest (TE 89ms, TR 3220ms, FOV 300mm, matrix 512×512, ST 4mm) and ultrafast-T2-weighted-sequence in the sagittal plane with repeating measurements (TE 1.54ms, TR 3.51ms, FOV 400mm, matrix 256×256, ST 6mm). Changes of anorectal angle (ARA), anorectal descent (ARJ) and pelvic floor weakness were documented and measured data was compared to reference values of asymptomatic non-SCI subjects in the literature to assess feasibility., Results: MR-defecography provides evaluable imaging sequences of the induced evacuation phase in SCI patients. Measurement results for ARA, ARJ, hiatal width (H-line) and hiatal descent (M-line) deviate significantly from reference values in the literature in asymptomatic subjects without SCI. The overall mean values in our study for SCI patients were: ARA (rest) 127.3°, ARA (evacuation) 137.6°, ARJ (rest) 2.4cm, ARJ (evacuation) 4.0cm, H-line (rest) 7.6cm, H-line (evacuation) 8.1cm, M-line (rest) 2.6cm, M-line (evacuation) 4.2cm., Conclusions: MR-defecography is feasible in sensorimotor complete SCI patients. Individual MR-defecography findings may help to determine specific therapeutical options for respective patients suffering from severe NBD., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To investigate compliance with transanal irrigation (TAI) one year after a training session and to identify predictive factors for compliance., Methods: The compliance of one hundred eight patients [87 women and 21 men; median age 55 years (range 18-83)] suffering from constipation or fecal incontinence (FI) was retrospectively assessed. The patients were trained in TAI over a four-year period at a single institution. They were classified as adopters if they continued using TAI for at least one year after beginning the treatment or as non-adopters if they stopped. Predictive factors of compliance with TAI were based on pretreatment assessments and training progress. The outcomes of the entire cohort of patients who had been recruited for the TAI treatment were expressed in terms of intention-to-treat., Results: Forty-six of the 108 (43%) trained patients continued to use TAI one year after their training session. The patients with FI had the best results, with 54.5% remaining compliant with TAI. Only one-third of the patients who complained of slow transit constipation or obstructed defecation syndrome continued TAI. There was an overall discontinuation rate of 57%. The most common reason for discontinuing TAI was the lack of efficacy (41%). However, 36% of the patients who discontinued TAI gave reasons independent of the efficacy of the treatment such as technical problems (catheter expulsion, rectal balloon bursting, instilled water leakage or retention, pain during irrigation, anal bleeding, anal fissure) while 23% said that there were too many constraints. Of the patients who reported discontinuing TAI, the only predictive factor was the progress of the training (OR = 4.9, 1.3-18.9, P = 0.02)., Conclusion: The progress of the training session was the only factor that predicted patient compliance with TAI., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: None of the authors has a conflict of interest regarding this study.

Objective: To examine the relationship of visual analog scale (VAS) 'bother' scores for obstructed defecation (OD) with demographic data, physical examination and sonographic findings of the posterior compartment., Methods: All patients seen at a urogynecology clinic between January and October 2013 were included. Patients were diagnosed with OD if they had any of the following: incomplete bowel emptying, straining with bowel movement or need for digitation. Patients used a VAS to rate OD bother on a scale of 0-10 (0, no bother; 10, worst imaginable bother). For each patient, a comprehensive history was obtained, the International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification was performed and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound volumes were recorded on maximal Valsalva maneuver. Linear and multiple regression models were used to correlate bother VAS scores with demographic, clinical and sonographic findings., Results: Among 265 patients included in the analysis, 61% had OD symptoms with a mean VAS bother score of 5.6. OD bother scores were associated with a history of previous prolapse surgery (P = 0.0001), previous hysterectomy (P = 0.0006), descent of the posterior compartment (Bp; P = 0.004) and hiatal dimensions (Pb and Gh + Pb; P = 0.006 and P = 0.004). OD bother was associated with the following sonographic findings: true rectocele (P = 0.01), depth of rectocele (P = 0.04), descent of rectal ampulla (P = 0.02), enterocele (P = 0.03) and rectal intussusception (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: VAS bother scores are associated with both clinical and sonographic measures of posterior compartment descent. Rectal intussusception was most likely to result in highly bothersome symptoms of OD. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Obstructed defecation is a complex disorder that results in impaired propagation of stool from the rectum. It is one of the major subtypes of functional constipation and can be secondary to either functional or anatomic etiologies. Patients with obstructed defecation typically present with symptoms of abdominal discomfort, a sensation of incomplete evacuation and rectal obstruction, passage of hard stools, the need for rectal or vaginal digitation, excessive straining, and reduced stool frequency. Evaluation of obstructed defecation is multimodal, starting with a thorough history and physical examination with focus on the abdominal, perineal, and rectal examination. Additional modalities to elicit the diagnosis of obstructed defecation include proctoscopy, colonic transit time studies, anorectal manometry, a rectal balloon expulsion test, defecography, electromyography, and ultrasound. The results from these studies should be taken in the context of each patient's clinical situation, as there is no single criterion standard for the diagnosis of obstructed defecation. Surgery is typically a last resort for these patients and the majority of patients will have good symptomatic management with diet and lifestyle changes. Patients who are found to have functional mechanisms behind their obstructed defecation also benefit from pelvic floor exercises and biofeedback therapy.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of stapled transanal procedures performed by a 36 mm stapling device, the so-called TST36 stapler. Methods: From September 2013 to June 2014 a prospective observational study was carried out by 8 proctology centers in Germany. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) for incontinence and the Altomare ODS score were determined preoperatively. Follow-up examinations were performed after 14 days, one month and 6 months, at this time both scores were reevaluated. Results: 110 consecutive patients (71 women, 39 men) with a mean age of 59.7 years (±13.8 years) were included in the study. The eight participating institutes entered 3 to 31 patients each into the study. The indication for surgery was an advanced hemorrhoidal disease in 55 patients and ODS with rectal intussusception or rectocele in 55 patients. Mechanical problems with stapler introduction occurred in 22 cases (20%) and a partial stapleline dehiscence in 4 cases (3.6%). Additional stitches for bleeding from stapleline were necessary in 86 patients (78.2%). Reintervention was necessary for bleeding 7 times (6.3%). Severe complications during follow-up were stapleline dehiscence in one case and recurrent hemorrhoidal prolapse in 5 cases (4.5%). Altomare ODS score and CCIS improved significantly after surgery. Conclusions: Despite a notable complication rate during surgery and the postoperative period, the TST36 can be considered as an effective tool for low rectal stapling for anorectal prolapse causing hemorrhoids or obstructed defecation.

Introduction and Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in changes in obstructed defecation symptoms and posterior compartment prolapse between women who underwent posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair (PR) and those who did not., Methods: This was a two-site prospective cohort study of women undergoing prolapse or incontinence surgery in which a PR was, or was not, performed at the discretion of the surgeon. Women were assessed using validated obstructed defecation questionnaires and standardized examination measures (including POP-Q, measurement of transverse gh, and assessment for a rectovaginal pocket and laxity) prior to pelvic surgery and 12 weeks after surgery., Results: Of 68 women who underwent surgery, 43 had PR. The PR group had higher obstructed defecation symptoms and greater posterior compartment prolapse at baseline. At 12 weeks, obstructed defecation symptoms had improved significantly more in the PR group than in the no PR group (all p < 0.03). Anatomic outcomes showed greater improvement in point Bp in the PR group (-3.4 vs. -0.7 no PR, p < 0.001) and resolution of the rectovaginal pocket (86 % vs. 42 %, p = 0.002). There were no significant changes in obstructed defecation symptoms or anatomic outcomes from baseline in the no PR group, while the PR group showed significantly improved obstructed defecation symptoms and anatomic outcomes after repair (p < 0.001 for both)., Conclusions: Significant improvements in obstructed defecation symptoms and posterior compartment prolapse were seen after PR, but not in women who did not receive PR. Obstructed defecation symptoms, Bp and rectovaginal pocket were the measures best able to demonstrate improvement after PR. We recommend the use of these measures to assess the impact of surgery in the posterior compartment.

Purpose: Internal rectal prolapse is common and correlates with age. It causes a plug-like physical obstruction and is a major cause of defecation disorder. The progressive distortion of the prolapsing rectum likely causes secondary defects in the rectal wall, which may exacerbate rectal dysfunction. We undertook a prospective observational study to detect and quantify the neurologic and histopathologic changes in the rectal wall., Methods: We examined dorsal and ventral rectal wall specimens from consecutive patients with internal rectal prolapse undergoing stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). We subjected specimens to histopathologic and neuropathologic assessment, including immunohistochemistry. We also recorded patients' clinical and demographic characteristics and sought correlations between these and the pathologic findings., Results: We examined 100 specimens. The severity of rectal prolapse and the extent of descent of the perineum correlated significantly with age. Concomitant hemorrhoidal prolapse was noted in all male patients and in 79 % of female patients. Muscular and neuronal defects were detected in 94 and 90 % of the specimens, respectively. Only four specimens (4 %) were free of significant structural defects., Conclusion: Rectal prolapse traumatizes the rectum causing neuromuscular defects. The tissue trauma is due to shearing forces and ischemia caused by the intussusception. This initiates a self-reinforcing vicious circle of physical and functional obstruction, further impairing rectal evacuation and causing constipation and incontinence. The correlation between extent of prolapse and age suggests that internal rectal prolapse can be considered a degenerative disorder. Neural and motor defects in the wall of the rectum caused by rectal prolapse are likely irreversible., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Constipation, obstructed defecation, and fecal incontinence are frequent complaints in multiple sclerosis. The literature on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these disorders is scant. Using anorectal manometry, we compared the anorectal function in patients with and without multiple sclerosis. 136 patients referred from our Center for Multiple Sclerosis to the Coloproctology Outpatient Clinic, between January 2005 and December 2011, were enrolled. The patients were divided into four groups: multiple sclerosis patients with constipation (group A); multiple sclerosis patients with fecal incontinence (group B); non-multiple sclerosis patients with constipation (group C); non-multiple sclerosis patients with fecal incontinence (group D). Anorectal manometry was performed to measure: resting anal pressure; maximum squeeze pressure; rectoanal inhibitory reflex; filling pressure and urge pressure. The difference between resting anal pressure before and after maximum squeeze maneuvers was defined as the change in resting anal pressure calculated for each patient., Results: Group A patients were noted to have greater sphincter hypotonia at rest and during contraction compared with those in group C (p=0.02); the rectal sensitivity threshold was lower in group B than in group D patients (p=0.02). No voluntary postcontraction sphincter relaxation was observed in either group A or group B patients (p=0.891 and p=0.939, respectively)., Conclusions: The decrease in the difference in resting anal pressure before and after maximum squeeze maneuvers suggests post-contraction sphincter spasticity, indicating impaired pelvic floor coordination in multiple sclerosis patients. A knowledge of manometric alterations in such patients may be clinically relevant in the selection of patients for appropriate treatments and for planning targeted rehabilitation therapy.

Anterior rectocele is a common morphological condition in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome. Typical symptoms include incomplete evacuation, transanal or transvaginal digitation and soiling, which is frequently interpreted as fecal incontinence. Diagnosis of rectocele is made clinically and functional assessment of rectocele can be performed by dynamic imaging, e.g. by magnetic resonance (MR) defecography. Primary treatment should be conservative. Concerning surgical treatment, transanal, transperineal, transvaginal and transabdominal procedures are available. Evidence-based guidelines for surgical treatment are still lacking. The question whether rectocele is a cause or a consequence of obstructive defecation syndrome remains controversial. Accordingly, indications for surgical correction of rectocele should be considered with caution.

Objective: To evaluate the role of dynamic MR defecography before rectal filling in detecting occult anterior compartment prolapse in patients with obstructed defecation., Methods: This prospective study was approved by the ethics committee. Seventy six females with obstructed defecation underwent dynamic MR defecography before and after rectal filling. Pre-rectal and post-rectal filling sequences were interpreted separately by two radiologists on two different settings with a time interval of one week. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon's-matched-pairs signed rank test and t-test for matched pairs; differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05., Results: Fifty eight females of 76 showed additional anterior compartment derangement, with 27 diagnosed only in pre-rectal filling sequence (27/58=46.55%). Following rectal filling detected cystocele in 27 patients was not identified in 14 cases and downgraded in 13. Similarly, detected uterine prolapse in 17 patients was not visualized in 14 patients and downgraded in 3. Furthermore, rectocele was identified in 7 cases before gel enema, additional 32 detected after rectal filling. Significant statistical difference in the detection of both cystocele (p=0.0001) and uterine prolapse (p=0.0013) was identified in the non-filled sequence., Conclusion: Pelvic floor imaging before rectal filling is significantly better for detection of anterior compartment prolapse., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Chronic constipation is a prevalent disorder with considerable impact on healthcare costs and quality of life. Most patients would respond to conservative measures in primary care. Patients with refractory constipation are commonly referred to dedicated centers for appropriate investigations and management. After testing, three main subtypes of constipation are commonly identified: normal colon transit, slow transit, and functional defecation disorders. The etiology of functional defecation disorders is consistent with maladaptive behavior, and biofeedback therapy has been considered a valuable treatment option. Being safe and only marginally invasive, retraining has been historically employed to manage all types of refractory constipation. There are a number of strongly held beliefs about biofeedback therapy that are not evidence-based. The aim of this review was to address these beliefs concerning protocols, efficacy, indications, and safety, with a special focus on the relevance of identifying patients with a functional defecation disorder who are ideal candidates for retraining. Randomized controlled trials support the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy for severe, refractory constipation due to functional defecation disorders. Limitations of the treatment are discussed, but biofeedback remains the safest option to successfully manage this hard-to-treat subtype of constipation.

Introduction and Hypothesis: Defecatory dysfunction is a relatively common and challenging problem among women and one that practicing pelvic reconstructive surgeons and gynecologists deal with frequently. A subset of defecatory dysfunction includes obstructed defecation, which can have multiple causes, one of which is descending perineum syndrome (DPS)., Methods: A literature search was performed to identify the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of DPS., Results: Although DPS has been described in the literature for many decades, it is still uncommonly diagnosed and difficult to manage. A high index of suspicion combined with physical examination consistent with excess perineal descent, patient symptom assessment, and imaging in the form of defecography are required for the diagnosis to be accurately made. Primary management options of DPS include conservative measures consisting of bowel regimens and biofeedback. Although various surgical approaches have been described in limited case series, no compelling evidence can be demonstrated at this point to support surgical intervention., Conclusions: Knowledge of DPS is essential for the practicing pelvic reconstructive surgeon to make a timely diagnosis, avoid harmful treatments, and initiate therapy early on.

External and internal rectal prolapse with their affiliated rectocele and enterocele, are associated with debilitating symptoms such as obstructed defecation, pelvic pain and faecal incontinence. Since perineal procedures are associated with a higher recurrence rate, an abdominal approach is commonly preferred. Despite the description of greater than three hundred different procedures, thus far no clear superiority of one surgical technique has been demonstrated. Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a relatively new and promising technique to correct rectal prolapse. In contrast to the abdominal procedures of past decades, VMR avoids posterolateral rectal mobilisation and thereby minimizes the risk of postoperative constipation. Because of a perceived acceptable recurrence rate, good functional results and low mesh-related morbidity in the short to medium term, VMR has been popularized in the past decade. Laparoscopic or robotic-assisted VMR is now being progressively performed internationally and several articles and guidelines propose the procedure as the treatment of choice for rectal prolapse. In this article, an outline of the current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for the treatment of internal and external rectal prolapse is presented.