Search

Background/aim: Nivolumab is an FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for patients with advanced, pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, treatment profiles and patient outcomes often differ in routine clinical practice while the financial impact of approved therapies is largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the efficacy, tolerability, and economic impact of nivolumab in real-world settings (RWS) in Greece., Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with advanced pre-treated NSCLC, receiving nivolumab were recruited from October 2015 until November 2019 across 18 different clinical centers in Greece. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Cost analysis was conducted using a third-party public-payer perspective (National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision; EOPYY)., Results: A total of 346 patients, median age 66.5 years, were included. With 43.4 months median follow-up, median PFS was 7.8 months and median OS 15.8 months. The 1-year OS rate was 56.5%, 2-year OS 38.8%, and 3-year OS 27.3%. The ORR was 29.5% and DCR 58.7%, with a median response duration of 26.8 months. Patients with objective response were more likely to experience long-term survival (HR=0.14, p<0.001). Only 8.4% of patients experienced grade 3-4 adverse events. The presence of immune-related adverse events was associated with improved OS (HR=0.77, p=0.043). Nivolumab-associated economic burden accounted for €2,214.10 per cycle for each patient, mainly attributed to drug-acquisition costs., Conclusion: This is the first report of real-world efficacy, safety, and economic burden of nivolumab in pre-treated patients with NSCLC in Greece. Indirectly compared to clinical trials, nivolumab was associated with improved efficacy in RWS, further supporting its use in clinical practice and providing insights on clinical prognosticators. The main cost component affecting the nivolumab economic burden was drug-acquisition costs, while toxicity-associated cost was negligible., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Recently, the Patras Immunotherapy Score (PIOS) has been developed to estimate the survival benefit of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. The aim of this study was to validate the clinical value of PIOS in an external cohort of aNSCLC patients., Methods: PIOS is a baseline formula produced by the combination of performance status, body mass index, age and line of treatment. In this multicentre study, 626 patients with confirmed NSCLC pathology, who had been treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, as well as 444 patients with aNSCLC, who had been managed with chemotherapy alone, were retrospectively enrolled. Predictive and prognostic values of PIOS were finally evaluated., Results: Patients treated with immunotherapy and higher PIOS score had an improved progression-free survival not only in univariate [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.621, p = 0.001], but also in multivariable analysis (HR = 0.651, p = 0.003). In addition, improved overall survival with increasing PIOS score was also observed (HR = 0.608, p < 0.001) with this association remaining statistically significant after adjusting for programmed-cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (HR = 0.620, p < 0.001). In addition, patients with disease progression (PD) had lower scores compared to those with stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) in a two-tier model ( p < 0.001) as well as in a four-tier model (PD, SD, PR and CR; p < 0.001). Prognostic significance of PIOS score also persisted using a binary logistic regression analysis, adjusted for disease stage and PD-L1 status ( p = 0.002, odds ratio: 0.578). Contrarily, PIOS had no prognostic significance in the chemotherapy group; however, upon combined analysis of the two cohorts, PIOS was found to have a significant interaction with the type of treatment (HR = 0.066 with p < 0.001), confirming its predictive value for immunotherapy., Conclusions: This study provides further validation of PIOS in aNSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Survival is significantly related to the stage of the disease at diagnosis. Of quite importance is primary cytoreductive surgery, having as a goal to remove all visible tumor tissue, and is the standard primary treatment in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been implemented mostly in treating advanced disease, with studies performed having numerous limitations. Data extrapolated from these studies have not shown inferiority survival of NACT, compared to primary debulking surgery. The role of NACT is of particular interest because of the intrinsic mechanisms that are involved in the process, which can be proven as therapeutic approaches with enormous potential. NACT increases immune infiltration and programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) expression, induces local immune activation, and can potentiate the immunogenicity of immune-exclude high grade serous ovarian tumors, while the combination of NACT with bevacizumab, PARP inhibitors or immunotherapy remains to be evaluated. This article summarizes all available data on studies implementing NACT in the treatment of ovarian cancer, focusing on clinical outcomes and study limitations. High mortality rates observed among ovarian cancer patients necessitates the identification of more effective treatments, along with biomarkers that will aid treatment individualization., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Nikolaidi, Fountzilas, Fostira, Psyrri, Gogas and Papadimitriou.)

Background: Data on the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with concurrent autoimmune diseases (AID) are limited., Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter review of medical records of patients with cancer and underlying AID who received ICI. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Among 123 patients with pre-existing AID who received ICI, the majority had been diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 68.3%) and melanoma (14.6%). Most patients had a rheumatologic (43.9%), or an endocrine disorder (21.1%). Overall, 74 (60.2%) patients experienced an immune-related adverse event (irAE) after ICI initiation, AID flare (25.2%), or new irAE (35%). Frequent irAEs included thyroiditis, dermatitis and colitis. ICI was permanently discontinued due to unacceptable (8.1%) or fatal (0.8%) toxicity. In patients with NSCLC, corticosteroid treatment at the initiation of immunotherapy was associated with poor PFS (HR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.40-5.50, p = 0.003). The occurrence of irAE was associated with increased PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.92, p = 0.026). Both parameters maintained their independent prognostic significance., Conclusions: ICI in patients with cancer and pre-existing AID is associated with manageable toxicity that infrequently requires treatment discontinuation. However, since severe AID flare might occur, expected ICI efficacy and toxicity must be balanced., Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04805099., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

New treatment modalities have been recently introduced in the management of ovarian cancer (OC). Herein, we sought to investigate their implementation in routine clinical practice and examine the real-world management of OC in Greece. EpOCa was a non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective study in patients with advanced epithelial OC. The primary outcome was to estimate the proportions of the different treatment regimens used per line of therapy, while progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the key secondary endpoints. A total of 154 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom, 40% were tested for BRCA mutations and 30% were found to be positive. Nearly 90% of patients underwent debulking surgery at diagnosis, with few operations being also recorded upon relapse. Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) was predominantly used in the first line with half of patients also receiving angiogenesis inhibitor (AI), while non-platinum-based CT was preferred in later lines. The median PFS was 18.2 and 8.8 months in the first- and second-line setting, respectively, whereas the median OS was approximately 50 months. Our study adds to the available, but limited, real world data on the management of ovarian cancer providing evidence regarding the applied treatment strategies and outcomes of patients in Greece.

Pancreatic cancer (PaC) induces a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable state. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tinzaparin in combination with chemotherapy. The PaCT (pancreatic cancer and tinzaparin) study was a retrospective observational study that collected data regarding progression free survival (PFS) in advanced or metastatic PaC patients who received thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin during chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel (N) and gemcitabine (G). The primary end point was to compare, from already published data, the PFS of patients receiving thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin with the PFS of patients receiving chemotherapy with N-G but no thromboprophylaxis. Secondary end points were efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. In total, 110 PaC patients, 93% with advanced or metastatic disease, treated with N-G and tinzaparin (10,291 ± 1176 Anti-Xa IU, OD, median duration 8.7, IQR: 5.6-11.9 months) were enrolled. Of these, 52% were males and; the median age was 68 (40-86 years). The tumor was located to in the pancreatic head at in 45% of the patients. The median PFS was 7.9 months (IQR: 5.0-11.8 months). Out of 14 similar studies (involving 2994 patients) identified via systematic search, it was determined that the weighted PFS of patients receiving N-G but no anticoagulation was 5.6 months. Therefore, patients receiving tinzaparin had 39.54% higher PFS than patients without thromboprophylaxis ( p < 0.05). During the follow-up period of 18.3 ± 11.7 months, three (2.7%) thrombotic events were recorded while two clinically relevant non-major bleeding events occurred (1.9%). In conclusion, PFS in advanced PaC patients undergoing chemotherapy is positively impacted by anticoagulation. Thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin in treatment dose is efficient and safe.

Our aim was to determine the prevalence, prognostic and predictive role of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in cancer predisposing genes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Germline testing of 62 cancer susceptibility genes was performed on unselected patients diagnosed from 02/2003 to 01/2020 with PDAC, treated at Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)-affiliated Centers. The main endpoints were prevalence of P/LPVs and overall survival (OS). P/LPVs in PDAC-associated and homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes were identified in 22 (4.0%) and 42 (7.7%) of 549 patients, respectively. P/LPVs were identified in 16 genes, including ATM (11, 2.0%) and BRCA2 (6, 1.1%), while 19 patients (3.5%) were heterozygotes for MUTYH P/LPVs and 9 (1.6%) carried the low-risk allele, CHEK2 p.(Ile157Thr). Patients carrying P/LPVs had improved OS compared to non-carriers (22.6 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, there was a trend for improved OS in P/LPV carriers ( p = 0.063). The interaction term between platinum exposure and mutational status of HRR genes was not significant ( p -value = 0.35). A significant proportion of patients with PDAC carries clinically relevant germline P/LPVs, irrespectively of age, family history or disease stage. The predictive role of these P/LPVs has yet to be defined. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03982446.

Background: We evaluated real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity data and assessed treatment-related costs in patients with advanced breast cancer who received treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi)., Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective-retrospective analysis of patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who received a CDKi, in combination with endocrine therapy, at any line of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer (National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision (EOPYY)) perspective, assessing only costs related to direct medical care, including drug therapy costs and adverse drug reaction (ADR)-related costs., Results: From July 2015 to October 2019, 365 women received endocrine therapy combined with CDKi; median age was 61 years, postmenopausal 290 (80.6%) patients. CDKi were administered as first-line treatment in 149 (40.9%) patients, second-line treatment in 96 (26.4%) and third-line treatment and beyond in 119 (32.7%) patients. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 86 (23.6%) patients, whereas 8 (2.2%) patients permanently discontinued treatment due to toxicity. The median PFS for patients who received CDKi as first-line, second-line and third-line treatment and beyond was 18.7, 12 and 7.4 months, respectively. The median overall survival since the initiation of CDKi treatment was 29.9 months (95% CI: 23.0-not yet reached (NR)). The mean pharmaceutical therapy cost estimated per cycle was 2 724.12 € for each patient, whereas the main driver of the ADR-related costs was haematological adverse events., Conclusions: Treatment with CDKi was well tolerated, with a low drug discontinuation rate. Patients who received CDKi as first-line treatment had improved PFS and OS compared with second-line treatment and beyond. The main component of direct medical costs assessed in the cost analysis comprises CDKi pharmaceutical therapy costs., Trial Registration Number: NCT04133207., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EF: stock ownership: GENPREX INC, ARIAD and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Travel grant: Merck, Pfizer and K.A.M Oncology/Hematology. Advisory: LEO Pharma. Speaker fees: Roche and Pfizer. AV: advisory boards: Angelini and Takeda. Speaker fees: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche and MSD. Training programmes: Astellas, Genesis Pharma, Pfizer, LEO, Abbvie and TEVAAN. Travel fees: Pfizer, Merck, Hospira, Sanofi, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Kyowa Kirin-Anabiosis and Rafarm. AB: advisory role and honorarium: Pfizer and Novartis. SK: consultation/advisory: Astra Zeneca and Roche. Research: Novartis and Roche. Speaker: Astra Zeneca, Novartis and Roche. IB: advisory board: Pfizer and Novartis. Educational grant: Pfizer. Research Fund: Novartis and Lilly. AN: advisory board and speaker fees: Pfizer and Novartis. GA: advisory boards: Novartis, BMS, Roche Hellas, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, Genesis Pharma, Merck and Pfizer. AP: consultation fees: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Honoraria: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Research funds: BMS and Kura. AK: advisory role: Genesis Pharma. Honoraria: Pfizer. Speaker’s bureau: Roche. Research funding: Merck. Travel: MSD. Educational grants: Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Roche, BMS, MSD, Genesis and Ipsen. GM: honoraria/consultancy: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis and Amgen. Travel fees: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis, Astellas and Pierre Fabre. ER: consulting or advisory role: Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Research funding: Novartis, Demo Pharmaceutical, EORTC, Radius Pharmaceuticals, Tesaro, Parexel and Anabiosis Pharmaceuticals. Travel: Sanofi, Ipsen, Genesis Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Merck, Roche and Genekor. GF: advisory board: Pfizer, Sanofi and Roche. Honoraria: Astra Zeneca. Stock ownership: ARIAD and GENPREX. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Objective: We reported the alveolar bone histology prior to dental extractions in cancer patients, who received bone-targeting agents (BTA)., Subjects and Methods: Fifty-four patients were included. Patients underwent extractions, and bone biopsies were taken., Results: Extractions were performed due to pain, swelling, purulence, fistula, and numbness, not responding to treatment, in 40 patients (group A); extractions due to asymptomatic, non-restorable teeth, were performed in 14 patients (group B). Complete alveolar jaw bone histological necrosis was observed in 28 of 40 (70%) patients of group A and none of group B (p < .001). The development of clinical osteonecrosis (MRON) was assessed in 44 patients; 10 patients, who were also treated with Low Level Laser Treatments-LLLT, were excluded from this analysis, as the alternative therapies were a confounding factor. Twelve patients, with alveolar bone histological necrosis prior to extraction, developed medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) compared with two patients with vital or mixed vital/non-vital bone (p < .0007). BTAs >1 year and concurrent targeted therapy were also significantly associated with MRONJ (p = .016 and p = .050)., Conclusion: Pain, swelling, purulence, fistula, and numbness were significantly associated with complete bone histological necrosis prior to extractions and increased MRONJ development. Research is justified to explore whether histological necrosis represents an early stage of osteonecrosis., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Age may pertain to different tumor genotype characteristics which may interfere with treatment efficacy and prognosis. We investigated the distribution and prognostic effect of mutations and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (stromal TIL density) in young (≤35 years) and elderly (>65 years) early breast cancer patients., Materials and Methods: Paraffin tumor genotypes of all clinical subtypes from 345 patients were examined., Results: A total of 638 mutations were detected in 221 patients (64.1%). Compared to young, elderly patients presented with lower TIL density (p<0.001) but more TILs in TP53 mutated tumors (p=0.042). Mutation in one, rather than in 2 or more genes, conferred better outcome (DFS: HR=0.51, p=0.016; OS: HR=0.47, p=0.015) but the effect was age-independent., Conclusion: There are fewer TILs and different mutations patterns in tumors from elderly patients compared to young. Age and TIL-independent gene agnostic co-mutations affect patient outcome., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: FOLFIRI/aflibercept is approved as a second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but there are limited data for its use as a first-line treatment., Objective: To investigate the activity and safety of first-line FOLFIRI/aflibercept in mCRC, as well as to prospectively evaluate biomarkers of early response to treatment., Patients and Methods: MINOAS was a phase II trial that aimed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of first-line FOLFIRI/aflibercept in mCRC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the evaluation of CEACAM-positive circulating tumor cells (CTC) and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI as biomarkers., Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 259 chemotherapy cycles were administered. At the time of the preplanned interim analysis, all patients had discontinued treatment and the ORR was 61.3%, crossing the activity threshold for trial discontinuation. Median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI 7.8-9.0). Median OS had not been reached. There was one toxic death due to sepsis; grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (n = 5), diarrhea (n = 6), hypertension (n = 4), asthenia (n = 3), proteinuria (n = 1), and bowel perforation (n = 1). Retaining CTC-negative status predicted better OS compared to continuous detection of CTCs (p = 0.015). Early decrease of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in DW-MRI was associated with an objective response., Conclusion: The activity and safety of first-line FOLFIRI/aflibercept merit further evaluation in randomized studies. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Registration Number: NCT02624726.

Objective: We report the clinical features and management outcomes in 7 patients with everolimus-related stomatitis., Study Design: Fifteen women with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer receiving everolimus combined with exemestane were prospectively evaluated to assess the development of stomatitis. Oral ulcers were diagnosed based on established criteria., Results: Seven patients developed stomatitis (46.6%). All patients were treated with topical dexamethasone solution, while everolimus was temporarily discontinued in 4 patients. Stomatitis resolved within 1-2 weeks. Two of the 4 patients, who had interrupted everolimus, developed recurrent stomatitis following drug resume and everolimus was again discontinued and restarted after 2 weeks. To date, 5 patients receive everolimus in full dose. The 2 patients, who developed recurrent stomatitis, received a reduced dose., Conclusions: Everolimus-related oral ulcers were frequent and led to dose modifications. Controlled trials, endorsing a consensus in terminology, are needed to evaluate measures on prevention and management of this unique toxicity., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)