Search

Objectives: First-line pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy + osimertinib(Pem-Plat-Osi) improves progression-free survival as compared to osimertinib alone in advanced epidermal growth factor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, many patients are hesitant to commence chemotherapy upfront. We describe outcomes to Pem-Plat-Osi after first-line osimertinib failure., Materials and Methods: Patients with advanced EGFR-mutated (ex19del/L858R) NSCLC who had Pem-Plat-Osi between 1/7/2018-30/9/2023 after progression on first-line osimertinib at National Cancer Centre Singapore, Prince of Wales Hospital and Chinese University of Hong Kong were identified. Key endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 60 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis was 62, 53.3 % (32/60) were male and 76.7 % (46/60) were never smokers. Ex19del comprised 56.7 % (34/60) and L858R 43.3 % (26/60). Baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases were present in 66.7 % (40/60). Median TTF on osimertinib (TTF1) was 14.4 months(m) and median time to initiation of Pem-Plat-Osi was 41 days(d) (range 0-652) after progression on osimertinib. Partial response (PR) or stable disease to Pem-Plat-Osi was achieved in 81.7 %(49/60). Intracranial disease control was achieved in 90.6 % (29/32) of patients with measurable CNS metastases, including those who did not undergo brain radiotherapy. At median follow up of 31.2 m, median TTF on Pem-Plat-Osi (TTF2) was 6.6 m. Median TTF1 + TTF2 was 23.4 m and median OS was 34.2 m. Survival outcomes were similar comparing ex19del and L858R (median TTF1 + TTF2 21.8 m vs 23.5 m, p = 0.90; median OS 34.2 m vs 36.8 m, p = 0.37) and in patients without/with baseline CNS metastases (median TTF1 + TTF2 21.8 m vs 23.4 m, p = 0.44; median OS 36.2 m vs 31.9 m, p = 0.65). TTF1 duration was not significantly associated with TTF2 (p = 0.76). Patients who started Pem-Plat-Osi within 20d of progression on osimertinib had significantly longer TTF2 as compared to patients who started after 20d (median 8.4 m versus 6.0 months, p = 0.03), which remained statistically significant on multivariable analysis., Conclusions: Our real-world data supports the efficacy of Pem-Plat-Osi after progression on first-line osimertinib, including L858R and baseline CNS metastases. Chemotherapy initiation within 20d of Osi progression was predictive of superior TTF2., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Dr Saw reports grants from Astra Zeneca, consulting fees from Pfizer, Bayer, Astra Zeneca and Daiichi Sankyo, honoraria from Astra Zeneca, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche and Takeda, meeting support from MSD and Astra Zeneca from Pfizer, advisory board participation from Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Dr Lai reports grants from Astra Zeneca, Roche and Amgen and meeting support from Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr Chan reports meeting support from Roche, Astra Zeneca and Ipsen, outside the submitted work. Dr W.C. Tan reports grants from Singhealth, honoraria from Merck & Co, MSD and Astra Zeneca, meeting support from Ipsen Pharmaceuticals and Merck & Co, outside the submitted work. Dr A. Tan reports consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer and Pfizer, honoraria from Amgen, Guardant Health, Takeda, Juniper Biologics and Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr W.L. Tan reports grants from Astra Zeneca, honoraria from Novartis and Merck, meeting support from Astra Zeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim and Ipsen, outside the submitted work. Dr Kanesvaran reports honoraria from Astellas, MSD and Ipsen, leadership roles in ESMO and SIOG, outside the submitted work. Dr Lim reports grants from Taiho Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Janssen and Alentis Therapeutics, honoraria from MSD and Takeda, meeting support from Astra Zeneca and Alentis Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. Dr. Tan reports grants from ACM Biolabs, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer and Pfizer, consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, DKSH, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda, honoraria from Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda, Beigene, Regeneron, Zymeworks, meeting support from Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron and Zymeworks, outside the submitted work. Dr Mok reportsgrantsfrom AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, G1 Therapeutics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SFJ, Takeda, XCovery, consulting fees from Abbvie Inc, ACEA Pharma, Adagene, Alentis Therapeutics AG, Alpha Biopharma Co., Ltd, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics Co,AnHeart Therapeutics Inc,AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc,Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Ltd,BeiGene,BerGenBio ASA,Berry Oncology,Boehringer Ingelheim,Blueprint Medicines Corporation,Bristol Myers Squibb,Bowtie Life Insurance Company Limited,Bridge Biotherapeutics Inc,Covidien LP,C4 Therapeutics Inc,Cirina Ltd,CStone Pharmaceuticals,Curio Science,D3 Bio Ltd,Da Volterra,Daiichi Sankyo,Eisai,Elevation Oncology,F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./ Genentech,Fishawack Facilitate Ltd,G1 Therapeutics Inc,geneDecode Co., Ltd,Gilead Sciences, Inc,GLG’s Healthcare,Gritstone Oncology, Inc,Guardant Health,Hengrui Therapeutics Inc,HiberCell, Inc.,HutchMed,Ignyta Inc.,Illumina Inc.,IncyteCorporation,Inivata,IQVIA,Janssen,Lakeshore Biotech Ltd,Lilly,Lunit USA, Inc,Loxo-Oncology,Lucence Health Inc,Medscape LLC/ WebMD,Medtronic,Merck Serono,MSD,Mirati Therapeutics Inc,MiRXES,MoreHealth,Novartis,Novocure GmbH,Omega Therapeutics Inc,OrigiMed,OSE Immunotherapeutics,PeerVoice,Pfizer,PrIME Oncology,Prenetics Global Limited,Puma Biotechnology Inc,Qiming Development (HK) Ltd,Regen Medtech Holdings Limited,Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.,Roche Pharmaceuticals/ Diagnostics/ Foundation One,Sanofi-Aventis,SFJ Pharmaceutical Ltd,Simcere of America Inc,Synergy Research,Summit Therapeutics Sub, Inc,Takeda Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd,Tigermed,Vertex Pharmaceuticals,Virtus Medical Group,XENCOR, Inc,Yuhan Corporation,honorariafromACEA Pharma,Alpha Biopharma Co.Ltd,Amgen,Amoy Diagnostics Co. Ltd,AstraZeneca (before 1/1/19),BeiGene,BI,BMS,Daiichi Sankyo,Daz Group,Fishawack Facilitate Ltd.,InMed Medical Communication,Janssen Pharmaceutica NV,Jiahui Holdings Co. Limited,LiangYiHui Healthcare,Lilly,Lucence Health Inc.,MD Health Brazil,Medscape LLC,Merck Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd.,Merck Sharp & Dohme,MiRXES,Novartis,OrigiMed Co. Ltd.,P. Permanyer SL,PeerVoice, Physicians’ Education Resource,Pfizer,PrIME Oncology,Research to Practice,Roche Pharmaceuticals/ Diagnostics/ Foundation One,Sanofi-Aventis,Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting Co. Ltd,Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd,Takeda Oncology,Touch Independent Medical Education Ltd,meeting support fromNovartis,Roche,Pfizer, AstraZeneca,Daiichi Sankyo,BI,MiRXES,BMS,MSD,Abbvie,Zai Lab,Liangyihui,advisory boardforAbbVie Inc.,ACEA Pharma,Amgen,AstraZeneca,Alentis Therapeutics AG,BerGenBio ASA,Berry Oncology,Blueprint Medicines Corporation,Boehringer Ingelheim,Bowtie Life Insurance Co Ltd,Bristol Myers Squibb,C4 Therapeutics Inc,Covidien LP,CStone Pharmaceuticals,Curio Science,D3 Bio Ltd.,Daiichi Sankyo Inc.,Eisai,Fishawack Facilitate Ltd.,G1 Therapeutics Inc.,Gilead Sciences Inc.,Gritstone Oncology Inc,Guardant Health,geneDecode Co. Ltd. (uncompensated),Hengrui Therapeutics Inc.,HutchMed,Ignyta Inc.,Incyte Corporation,Imagene AI Ltd.,Inivata,IQVIA,Janssen,Lakeshore Biotech,Lily,Loxo-Oncology Inc.,Lunit Inc,Merck Serono,Merck Sharp & Dohme,Mirati Therapeutics Inc.,MiRXES Group,Novartis,OrigiMed,Pfizer,Prenetics Global Limited,Puma Biotechnology Inc.,Roche/Genentech,Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc,Sanofi-Aventis R&D,SFJ Pharmaceutical,Simcere of America Inc.,Simcere Zaiming, Inc.,Takeda,Vertex Pharmaceuticals,Virtus Medical Group,XENCOR, Inc,Yuhan Corporation,being member in the Board of DirectorsforAstraZeneca PLC,HutchMed,Aurora,Insighta,holding stock / stock optionofAstraZeneca,Aurora Tele-Oncology Ltd.,Biolidics Ltd.,HutchMed,Prenetics Global Limited,D3 Bio,Lunit,Bowtie Life Insurance, Lakeshore Biotech Ltd,Loxo-oncology,Virtus Medical Group,Yinson Capital Pte. Ltd.,Phanes Therapeutics, Inc.,Insighta,Alentis Therapeutics AG, outside the submitted work. Dr Li reports grants from Gilead, MSD and Astra Zeneca, honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer. Takeda, ACE Oncology, Merck, Guardant Health, Gilead, Janssen and MSD, meeting support from Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Amgen, advisory board for Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, AnHeart Therapeutics, Amgen, Takeda, Yuhan and Blossomhill therapeutics, outside the submitted work. No other conflicts of interest were declared.]., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) in nonsmokers are mostly driven by mutations in the oncogenes EGFR, ERBB2, and MET and fusions involving ALK and RET. In addition to occurring in nonsmokers, alterations in these "nonsmoking-related oncogenes" (NSRO) also occur in smokers. To better understand the clonal architecture and genomic landscape of NSRO-driven tumors in smokers compared with typical-smoking NSCLCs, we investigated genomic and transcriptomic alterations in 173 tumor sectors from 48 NSCLC patients. NSRO-driven NSCLCs in smokers and nonsmokers had similar genomic landscapes. Surprisingly, even in patients with prominent smoking histories, the mutational signature caused by tobacco smoking was essentially absent in NSRO-driven NSCLCs, which was confirmed in two large NSCLC data sets from other geographic regions. However, NSRO-driven NSCLCs in smokers had higher transcriptomic activities related to the regulation of the cell cycle. These findings suggest that, whereas the genomic landscape is similar between NSRO-driven NSCLC in smokers and nonsmokers, smoking still affects the tumor phenotype independently of genomic alterations., Significance: Non-small cell lung cancers driven by nonsmoking-related oncogenes do not harbor genomic scars caused by smoking regardless of smoking history, indicating that the impact of smoking on these tumors is mainly nongenomic., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Androgen receptor splice variant 7 (ARV-7) is a resistance mechanism to hormonal therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). It has been associated with poor outcomes. On progression to castrate resistance, ARV-7 positivity has been identified in global populations at an incidence of 17.8%-28.8%. Here, we characterize the incidence of ARV-7 positivity in Asian patients with mCRPC in a prospective fashion and evaluate its implications on treatment outcomes., Methods: Patients with mCRPC from multiple centers in Southeast and East Asia were enrolled in a prospective manner before initiation of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors or docetaxel. ARV-7 status was evaluated at baseline with three commercially available assays: AdnaTest Prostate Cancer platform, Clearbridge method, and IBN method. Clinical outcomes at progression were assessed. The primary end point of this study was prevalence of ARV-7 positivity; secondary end points were incidence of ARV-7 positivity, prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rate, PSA progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 102 patients with a median age of 72 years at enrollment participated. Overall, an incidence of ARV-7 positivity of between 14.3% and 33.7% in Asian patients with mCRPC was demonstrated depending on the assay used. Patients found to have ARV-7 positivity at enrollment had a numerically worse PSA PFS compared with ARV-7 negative patients., Conclusion: In this study, the incidence of ARV-7 positivity in Asian patients with mCRPC was shown to be similar to the global population. Patients with ARV-7 positivity appear to have more aggressive disease with numerically worse PSA PFS and OS. Further prospective studies are needed to fully characterize the relationship that ARV-7 positivity has on prognosis of Asian patients with mCRPC.

Background: In early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), recurrence is frequently observed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive tool to risk stratify patients for recurrence after curative intent therapy. This study aimed to risk stratify patients with early-stage NSCLC via a personalized, tumor-informed multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) next-generation sequencing assay., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with stage I-III NSCLC. Recruited patients received standard-of-care management (surgical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surveillance). Whole-exome sequencing of NSCLC resected tissue and matched germline DNA was used to design patient-specific mPCR assays (Signatera, Natera, Inc) to track up to 16 single-nucleotide variants in plasma samples., Results: The overall cohort with analyzed plasma samples consisted of 57 patients. Stage distribution was 68% for stage I and 16% each for stages II and III. Presurgery (i.e., at baseline), ctDNA was detected in 15 of 57 patients (26%). ctDNA detection presurgery was significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR], 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-12.62; p = .009). In the postsurgery setting, ctDNA was detected in seven patients, of whom 100% experienced radiological recurrence. ctDNA positivity preceded radiological findings by a median lead time of 2.8 months (range, 0-12.9 months). Longitudinally, ctDNA detection at any time point was associated with shorter RFS (HR, 16.1; 95% CI, 1.63-158.9; p < .0001)., Conclusions: ctDNA detection before surgical resection was strongly associated with a high risk of relapse in early-stage NSCLC in a large unique Asian cohort. Prospective studies are needed to assess the clinical utility of ctDNA status in this setting., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Single-agent checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) activity in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is limited. Dual CPI shows increased activity in solid cancers. In this single-arm phase II trial (NCT03097939), 40 patients with recurrent/metastatic EBV-positive NPC who failed prior chemotherapy receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. Primary outcome of best overall response rate (BOR) and secondary outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], clinical benefit rate, adverse events, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival [OS]) are reported. The BOR is 38% with median PFS and OS of 5.3 and 19.5 months, respectively. This regimen is well-tolerated and treatment-related adverse events requiring discontinuation are low. Biomarker analysis shows no correlation of outcomes to PD-L1 expression or tumor mutation burden. While the BOR does not meet pre-planned estimates, patients with low plasma EBV-DNA titre (<7800 IU/ml) trend to better response and PFS. Deep immunophenotyping of pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies demonstrate early activation of the adaptive immune response, with T-cell cytotoxicity seen in responders prior to any clinically evident response. Immune-subpopulation profiling also identifies specific PD-1 and CTLA-4 expressing CD8 subpopulations that predict for response to combined immune checkpoint blockade in NPC., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved for use in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. We examined its performance in the second/subsequent line after resistance to first- and second-generation (1/2G) EGFR-TKI., Methods: We reviewed electronic records of 202 patients who received osimertinib from July 2015 to January 2019 in the second/subsequent line after progression on prior EGFR-TKI. Of these, complete data from 193 patients were available. Clinical data including patient characteristics, primary EGFR mutation, T790M mutation status, presence of baseline brain metastases (BM), first-line EGFR-TKI use, and survival outcomes were extracted, and results retrospectively analyzed., Results: Of 193 evaluable patients, 151 (78.2%) were T790M+ (T790M positive) with 96 (49.2%) tissue confirmed; 52% of patients received osimertinib in the second line setting. After median follow up of 37 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort was 10.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.64-11.50] months and median overall survival (OS) was 20 (95% CI: 15.61-23.13) months. Overall response rate (ORR) to osimertinib was 43% (95% CI: 35.9-50.3%); 48.3% in T790M+ vs . 20% in T790M- (T790M negative) patients. OS in T790M+ patients was 22.6 vs . 7.9 months in T790M- patients (HR 0.43, P=0.001), and PFS was 11.2 vs . 3.1 months respectively (HR 0.52, P=0.01). Tumour T790M+ was significantly associated with longer PFS (P=0.007) and OS (P=0.01) compared to tumour T790M- patients, however this association was not seen with plasma T790M+. Of the 22 patients with paired tumor/plasma T790M testing, response rate (RR) to osimertinib was 30% for those plasma T790M+/tumour T790M-, compared to 63% and 67% for those who were plasma T790M+/tumour T790M+ and plasma T790M-/tumour T790M+, respectively. By multivariable analysis (MVA), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2 was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.53, P<0.001) and PFS (HR 2.10, P<0.001), whereas presence of T790M+ was associated with longer OS (HR 0.50, P=0.008) and PFS (HR 0.57, P=0.027)., Conclusions: This cohort demonstrated the efficacy of osimertinib in second line/beyond for EGFR+ (EGFR mutation-positive) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tissue T790M result appeared more predictive of osimertinib efficacy compared to plasma, highlighting potential T790M heterogeneity and the advantage with paired tumor-plasma T790M testing at TKI resistance. T790M- disease at resistance remains an unmet treatment need., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-22-661/coif). JM reports travel support for meetings from AstraZeneca. GGYL reports honoraria from Amgen and consulting/advisory role for Merck, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche. MKA reports support for meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ipsen; honoraria from Boston Scientific and consulting/advisory role for Merck. RK reports research funding support from Sanofi (Inst), Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Inst); honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, MSD Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, consulting/advisory role for Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Mundipharma. TR reports honoraria and Speakers’ Bureau from Novartis, consulting/advisory role for Ipsen and Eisai. TKHL reports honoraria for AstraZeneca and consulting/advisory role for MSD. DSWT reports research funding from Novartis (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst); honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Roche and Pfizer; consulting/advisory role for Novartis, Merck, Loxo, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer. DWTL reports research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting/advisory role for Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim and stock ownership from Clearbridge Biomedics. QSN reports research funding from Novartis, MSD Oncology and Bayer; honoraria from MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca and Pierre Fabre and consulting/advisory role for Boehringer Ingelheim. WLT reports educational grant support from AstraZeneca; honoraria from Novartis, Merck, and Amgen; support for meetings from AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), and DKSH. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To determine the prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) score in early-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), contrasted against EGFR-wildtype NSCLC., Methods: Consecutive patients with Stage IA-IIIA NSCLC diagnosed 1st January 2010-31st December 2019 at National Cancer Centre Singapore with evaluable EGFR and PD-L1 status were included. Co-primary end-points were 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier method., Results: 455 patients were included (267 EGFR-mutated, EGFR-M+; 188 EGFR-wildtype, wt). Median age at diagnosis was 65 years, 52.3% (238/455) of patients were males, 62.9% (286/455) of patients were never-smokers and 92.5% (421/455) of patients had R0 resection. Stage IA comprised 42.4% (193/455) of patients, Stage IB comprised 23.1% (105/455) of patients, Stage IIA comprised 10.8% of patients (49/455), Stage IIB comprised 5.1% of patients (23/455) and Stage IIIA comprised 18.7% (85/455) of patients. Among EGFR-M+, 45.3% (121/267) were Ex19del and 41.9% (112/267) were L858R. PD-L1 ≥1% among EGFR-M+ and EGFR-wt was 45.3% (121/267) and 54.8% (103/188) respectively (p = 0.047). At median follow-up of 47 months, 178 patients had relapsed. Among EGFR-M+, 2-year DFS comparing PD-L1 <1% and PD-L1 ≥1% was 78.1% and 67.6% (p = 0.007) while 5-year OS was 59.5% and 42.8% (p = 0.001), respectively. Controlling for age, gender, lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant therapy and resection margin status, PD-L1 ≥1% (hazard ratio, HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.04-4.54, p = 0.038), stage IIB (HR 7.78, 95% CI 1.72-35.27, p = 0.008) and stage IIIA (HR 4.45, 95% CI 1.44-13.80, p = 0.01) emerged as independent predictors of inferior OS on multivariable analysis. In exploratory analysis, genomic analysis of 81 EGFR-M+ tumours was performed. PD-L1 ≥1% tumours had significantly higher rates of TP53 mutations (36.1% versus 15.6%, p = 0.04), with predominantly missense mutations., Conclusion: PD-L1 ≥1% is an independent predictor of worse OS among early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC and is associated with inferior DFS regardless of EGFR status. PD-L1 score as a risk stratification factor should be evaluated in prospective adjuvant studies among EGFR-mutated NSCLC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Saw reported receiving personal fees from Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca and MSD outside the submitted work. Dr A. Tan reported receiving personal fees from Amgen and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Lai reported receiving personal fees from Amgen and grants from Merck, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr D.W.T. Lim reported receiving grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Boehringer-Ingelheim and personal fees from Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Taiho, and Astra-Zeneca outside the submitted work. Dr Kanesvaran reported receiving personal fees from Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Eisai, Ipsen and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Ng reported serving on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck outside the submitted work. Dr W.L. Tan reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Merck and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr. Ong reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD and Medtronic, non-financial support from Johnson & Johnson, personal fees and non-financial support from Stryker outside the submitted work. Dr D.S.W. Tan reported grants from AstraZeneca and Amgen and personal fees from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Amgen, and C4 Therapeutics outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pembrolizumab previously demonstrated robust antitumor activity and manageable safety in a phase Ib study of patients with heavily pretreated, PD-L1-positive, recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The phase III KEYNOTE-122 study was conducted to further evaluate pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-pretreated, recurrent and/or metastatic NPC. Final analysis results are presented., Patients and Methods: KEYNOTE-122 was an open-label, randomized study conducted at 29 sites, globally. Participants with platinum-pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic NPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab or chemotherapy with capecitabine, gemcitabine, or docetaxel. Randomization was stratified by liver metastasis (present versus absent). The primary end point was overall survival (OS), analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using the stratified log-rank test (superiority threshold, one-sided P = 0.0187). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population., Results: Between May 5, 2016, and May 28, 2018, 233 participants were randomly assigned to treatment (pembrolizumab, n = 117; chemotherapy, n = 116); Most participants (86.7%) received study treatment in the second-line or later setting. Median time from randomization to data cutoff (November 30, 2020) was 45.1 months (interquartile range, 39.0-48.8). Median OS was 17.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7-22.9) with pembrolizumab and 15.3 months (95% CI, 10.9-18.1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.67-1.19; P = 0.2262]). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12 of 116 participants (10.3%) with pembrolizumab and 49 of 112 participants (43.8%) with chemotherapy. Three treatment-related deaths occurred: 1 participant (0.9%) with pembrolizumab (pneumonitis) and 2 (1.8%) with chemotherapy (pneumonia, intracranial hemorrhage)., Conclusion: Pembrolizumab did not significantly improve OS compared with chemotherapy in participants with platinum-pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic NPC but did have manageable safety and a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events., Clinical Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02611960., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: HER2 -altered non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a diverse subgroup, including mutations, amplifications, and overexpression. However, HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations are emerging as a distinct molecular subtype with expanding therapeutic options. We describe the molecular epidemiology and genomic features of HER2 -altered NSCLC in an Asian tertiary cancer center., Methods: We identified patients with HER2 -mutated NSCLC in our institutional database, collating clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes. The genomic landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2 )-mutated NSCLC was further evaluated using whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from combined local and publicly available data sets. HER2 amplification and overexpression as selection biomarkers in NSCLC were further interrogated using HER2 immunohistochemistry and correlations with WES and RNA sequencing data., Results: Among 1,252 patients with consecutive lung adenocarcinoma undergoing routine next-generation sequencing, the prevalence of HER2 mutations was 3.1%-exon 20 insertion mutations comprised 2.7%. We examined the clinicopathological features in 55 patients with HER2 -mutated NSCLC comprising 40 exon 20 insertion and 15 nonexon 20 insertion mutations. The most common exon 20 insertion mutation was HER2 Y772&#95;A775dup in 30 (75%), followed by HER2 G776delinsVC in five patients (13%). There were limited responses to HER2-directed therapies apart from trastuzumab-deruxtecan, and no responses were seen with immunotherapy monotherapy. Evaluating the genomics features of HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations using WES data revealed low tumor mutational burden (TMB), low incidence of cancer driver comutations, and a predominance of aging mutational signature-similar to EGFR -mutated tumors. In contrast, uncommon (or nonexon 20 insertion) HER2 -mutated tumors resembled EGFR wild-type tumors with higher TMB, higher frequency of cancer driver comutations, and greater presence of smoking and APOBEC mutational signature. Finally, in evaluating HER2 immunohistochemistry in all lung adenocarcinoma, there was significant discordance comparing different scoring systems and poor correlation with HER2 RNA expression and HER2 amplification., Conclusion: The incidence of HER2 mutations is 3.1% in East Asian nonsquamous NSCLC. HER2 exon 20 insertion-mutated tumors appear genomically distinct from uncommon (nonexon 20 insertion) HER2 mutations, the latter demonstrating higher TMB, co-occurring drivers, and predominant nonaging mutational signature. The therapeutic implications of the genomic and clinical features of HER2 -mutated NSCLC warrant further investigation.

Introduction: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically improved outcomes for nononcogene-addicted NSCLC, monotherapy with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1) inhibition has been associated with low efficacy in the EGFR-mutant setting. Given the potential for synergism with combination checkpoint blockade, we designed a trial to test the activity of combination nivolumab (N)-ipilimumab (NI) in EGFR-mutant NSCLC., Methods: This is a randomized phase 2 study (NCT03091491) of N versus NI combination in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant NSCLC, with crossover permitted on disease progression. The primary end point was the objective response rate, and the secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety of ICI after EGFR TKI., Results: Recruitment ceased owing to futility after 31 of 184 planned patients were treated. A total of 15 patients received N and 16 received NI combination. There were 16 patients (51.6%) who had programmed death-ligand (PDL1) 1 greater than or equal to 1%, and 15 (45.2%) harbored EGFR T790M. Five patients derived clinical benefits from ICI with one objective response (objective response rate 3.2%), and median progression-free survival was 1.22 months (95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.35) for the overall cohort. None of the four patients who crossed over achieved salvage response by NI. PDL1 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were not able to predict ICI response. Rates of all grade immune-related adverse events were similar (80% versus 75%), with only two grade 3 events., Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibition is ineffective in EGFR TKI-resistant NSCLC. Whereas a small subgroup of EGFR-mutant NSCLC may be immunogenic and responsive to ICI, better biomarkers are needed to select appropriate patients., (© 2022 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.)

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of renal cell carcinoma was published in 2019 with an update planned for 2021. It was therefore decided by both the ESMO and the Singapore Society of Oncology (SSO) to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in May 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2019 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of renal cell carcinomas in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate., Competing Interests: Disclosure RK declares institutional payments from Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Eisai, Amgen, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson (J&J), Novartis and Merck, support for meeting attendance or travel from Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Eisai, Amgen, Astellas, J&J, Novartis and Merck. CP declares consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer, payment or honoraria from Angelini Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, General Electric, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche. AW declares personal fees from MS, MSD, Pfizer, EISAI and IPSEN, participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for BMS, MSD, Pfizer, EISAI, IPSEN. TP declares research funding from Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Novartis, J&J, Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Exelixis and Eisai, honoraria from Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Novartis, J&J, Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Exelixis and Eisai. QSN declares support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD and Astellas, participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for MSD and Boehringer Ingelheim. MSc declares honoraria from BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, EUSA, EISAI, EXELIXIS and Ipsen, consulting fees from BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, EUSA, EISAI, EXELIXIS and Ipsen, support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, Roche, Pfizer and Ipsen, participation on a data or safety monitoring board for BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, EUSA, EISAI, EXELIXIS and Ipsen. YM declares payments or honoraria from BMS, MSD and Takeda, participation on an advisory board for Chugai Pharmaceutical and Takeda, local PI, institutional, financial interest from MSD. JL declares grants or contracts from Pfizer, Ipsen, BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board from Pfizer Korea, Astella Korea, BMS, Merck, MSD, AstraZeneca, stocks or stock options from Myovant Sciences, Amgen, J&J and Merck. FC declares payment for educational events from Eisai and Pfizer, receipt of equipment for a patient sampling programme from Pfizer. Y-SP declares honoraria and consulting fees from MSD, Roche, Merck, Ipsen, BMS/ONO, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), support for attending meetings and/or travel from Ipsen, BMS/ONO, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas and Janssen. MSa declares research grants from Roche and MSD, payments or honoraria from MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Amgen and Ipsen, receipt of equipment/materials for a compassionate programme for drugs/drug samples from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Ipsen, Eisai and MSD. HL declares payment or honoraria from MSD, Amgen, Astellas and IPSEN, participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for MSD and Astellas. HK declares payment or honoraria from BMS, MSD, Merck Biopharma, Takeda and Pfizer. GSB (deceased). GC declares institutional grants from Merck, consulting fees from BMS, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Lilly, Novartis and Seattle Genetics, payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche and Daichii Sankyo. SC declares consulting fees from BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche and Servier, payment or honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, Ipsen, MSD Eisai and Bayer, consulting fees from BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche and Servier and stock or stock options in BMS and Agenus Oncology. SP declares fees for consultancy/advisory roles from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Imedex, Incyte, Janssen, Medscape, MSD, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, Pharma Mar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PER, Pfizer, PRIME, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, speaker roles for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Illumina, Imedex, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, PER, Pfizer, Prime, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Takeda and the receipt of grants/research support: (Sub) investigator in trials (institutional financial support for trials) sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Clovis, GSK, Illumina, Lilly, MSD, Merck Serono, Mirati, Novartis, and Pfizer, Phosplatin Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech. TY declares institutional grants or contracts from Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Sumitomo Dainippon, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Parexel International, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. See also ICMJE forms., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx was published in 2020. It was therefore decided by both the ESMO and the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in July 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to consider the potential ethnic differences associated with the treatment of SCCs of the head and neck (SCCHN) in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with SCCHN (excluding nasopharyngeal carcinomas) representing the oncological societies of Korea (KSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter was discussed when appropriate. This manuscript provides a series of expert recommendations (Clinical Practice Guidelines) which can be used to provide guidance to health care providers and clinicians for the optimisation of the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with SCC of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx across Asia., Competing Interests: Disclosure BK declares grants or contracts from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) Oncology, Ono Pharmaceutical and AstraZeneca, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, ABL Bio, Genexine, Cellid, Handok, Celid, Trial Informatics and CBS Bio, payment or honoraria from MSD Oncology and Merck. J-PM declares consulting fees/honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Innate, Merck Serono, Boehringer, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Novartis, Janssen, Incyte, Cue Biopharma, ALX Oncology, iTEOS, TheRNA and NEKTAR, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, Pfizer and MSD and participation at a Safety or Advisory Board for PsiOxus. LL declares institutional grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene International, Eisai, Exelixis Inc, Debiopharm International SA, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., IRX Therapeutics Inc., Medpace Inc., Merck-Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Spa and Buran and receipt of honoraria or fees (for public speaking/teaching in medical meetings and/or for providing expert opinion in Advisory Boards) for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, MSD, Merck-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffman La Roche Ltd., Novartis, Roche, Debiopharm International SA, Sobi, Incyte Biosciences Italy SRL, Doxa Pharma, Amgen, Nanobiotics and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). CB declares payment or honoraria from Merck KGaA, BMS and Roche. MT declares consulting fees from Ono Pharmaceuticals, MSD, BMS and Merck Biopharma, and honoraria from Eisai, Ono Pharmaceuticals, BMS and Merck Biopharma. MA declares consulting fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, DKSH, Eisai, Roche, Novartis and Merck, payment or honoraria from MSD, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, DKSH, Eisai, Roche, Novartis and Merck, support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Roche, Elekta/Abex and AstraZeneca, and is the president of the Malaysian Oncological Society. MKA declares honoraria for presentations from Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim, sponsorship for meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and DKSH. QSNg declares support for attending meetings and or travel from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD and Astellas, and participation in Safety or Advisory Boards for MSD and Boehringer Ingelheim. WIWZ declares honoraria for lectures from Amgen Malaysia, DKSH Malaysia, Eisai Malaysia, Eli Lilly Malaysia, Ipsen Malaysia, MSD Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, Merck Serono Malaysia, Pfizer Malaysia and Roche Malaysia, travel grants from Amgen Malaysia, Celgene Malaysia, Eisai Malaysia, Eli Lilly Malaysia, MSD Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and Roche Malaysia, participation on an Advisory Board for Celgene Malaysia, Roche Malaysia, Eli Lilly Malaysia, Eisai Malaysia and MSD Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and is a member of ASCO AP Regional Council and Greater Petaling Cancer City Challenge UICC. NK declares institutional grants or contracts from Ono Pharmaceutical, BMS, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Rakuten Medical, Bayer and Adlai Nortye, payment or honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical, BMS, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Eisai and Bayer, participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Bayer and Adlai Nortye. GC declares institutional grants from Merck, consulting fees from BMS, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Lilly, Novartis and Seattle Genetics, payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche and Daichii Sankyo. SP declares fees for consultancy/advisory roles from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Imedex, Incyte, Janssen, Medscape, MSD, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, PharmaMar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PER, Pfizer, PRIME, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, speaker roles for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Illumina, Imedex, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, PER, Pfizer, Prime, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Takeda and the receipt of grants/research support: (Sub) investigator in trials (institutional financial support for trials) sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Clovis, GSK, Illumina, Lilly, MSD, Merck Serono, Mirati, Novartis, and Pfizer, Phosplatin Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech. TWK declares institutional grants or contracts from Roche, and sanofi-aventis. TY declares institutional grants or contracts from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Dainippon, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Parexel International, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo and Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

This study aims to examine the information seeking behaviours and experiences of cancer survivors at various stages of the cancer survivorship trajectory in Singapore. Data was collected via a self-administered questionnaire from survivors diagnosed with the top 6 cancers in Singapore seen at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS). Cancer survivorship stages were categorized as newly diagnosed and on treatment (NT), completed treatment or cancer-free ≥ 5 years (CT) and had recurrence or second cancer (RS). Out of the 998 cancer survivors, 676 (68%) had searched for cancer information since their diagnosis. About 57% of the searchers did their most recent search in the past 6 months prior to the survey, with most of these survivors from the NT and RS groups. Around half of the searchers (55%) obtained cancer information from the internet. The most preferred source for cancer information was the internet (38%), followed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) (23%). About half (49%) obtained cancer information from their preferred source. Some information searchers (24%) did not do so, out of which about half used the internet to obtain information that they would have preferred to obtain from HCPs. The top 3 most commonly sought information was related to treatment, cancer and diet/nutrition. Half of the searchers were concerned with the quality of the information that they found. These information seeking behaviours and experiences were similar across cancer survivorship stages. Our study reveals that information seeking is prevalent across all survivorship stages. Patterns of information-seeking revealed a discrepancy between preferred and actual source., (© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.)

Aim: Radium-223, a targeted alpha therapy, is approved widely for the treatment of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, based on a pivotal phase 3 study in predominantly white patients. We investigated the efficacy and safety of radium-223 in Asian patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer and metastatic bone disease., Methods: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm, open-label phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the standard radium-223 regimen (55 kBq/kg every 4 weeks for six cycles) in patients from Asian countries. The primary endpoints were the safety and overall survival., Results: A total of 226 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of radium-223. Median overall survival was 14.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2-17.4). Median time to total alkaline phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen progression were 7.5 (95% CI, 6.8-7.7) and 3.6 (95% CI, 3.1-3.7) months, respectively. Median skeletal-related event-free survival was 26.0 months (95% CI, 12.6-not reached). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 103 (46%) of 226 patients, with anemia being the most common event (34 [15%] patients). Grade ≥3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 39 (17%) of 226 patients. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 65 (29%) of 226 patients. Seven (3%) patients had an adverse event leading to death; none were considered to be related to radium-223., Conclusion: The results of this study support the use of the standard radium-223 regimen for the treatment of Asian patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bone metastases., (© 2020 The Authors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: Despite the established role of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR -mutated NSCLC, drug resistance inevitably ensues, with a paucity of treatment options especially in EGFR T790M -negative resistance., Experimental Design: We performed whole-exome and transcriptome analysis of 59 patients with first- and second-generation EGFR TKI-resistant metastatic EGFR -mutated NSCLC to characterize and compare molecular alterations mediating resistance in T790M-positive (T790M + ) and -negative (T790M - ) disease., Results: Transcriptomic analysis revealed ubiquitous loss of adenocarcinoma lineage gene expression in T790M - tumors, orthogonally validated using multiplex IHC. There was enrichment of genomic features such as TP53 alterations, 3q chromosomal amplifications, whole-genome doubling and nonaging mutational signatures in T790M - tumors. Almost half of resistant tumors were further classified as immune hot , with clinical outcomes conditional on immune cell-infiltration state and T790M status. Finally, using a Bayesian statistical approach, we explored how T790M - and T790M + disease might be predicted using comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic profiles of treatment-naïve patients., Conclusions: Our results illustrate the interplay between genetic alterations, cell lineage plasticity, and immune microenvironment in shaping divergent TKI resistance and outcome trajectories in EGFR -mutated NSCLC. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling may facilitate the design of bespoke therapeutic approaches tailored to a tumor's adaptive potential., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: The recently published ADAURA study has posed a significant dilemma for clinicians in selecting patients for adjuvant osimertinib. Risk factors for recurrence in early-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) also remain undefined., Objective: To determine clinicopathologic characteristics and recurrence patterns of resected early-stage EGFR-positive NSCLC, using wildtype EGFR as a comparator cohort, and identify features associated with recurrence., Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a cohort study including patients diagnosed with AJCC7 Stage IA to IIIA NSCLC between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2018, who underwent curative surgical procedures at a specialist cancer center in Singapore. The cutoff for data analysis was October 15, 2020. Patient demographic characteristics, treatment history, and survival data were collated. In exploratory analysis, whole-exome sequencing was performed in a subset of 86 patients. Data were analyzed from September 3, 2020, to June 6, 2021., Exposures: Adjuvant treatment was administered per investigator's discretion., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS)., Results: A total of 723 patients were included (389 patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC; 334 patients with wildtype EGFR NSCLC). There were 366 women (50.6%) and 357 men (49.4%), and the median (range) age was 64 (22-88) years. A total of 299 patients (41.4%) had stage IA NSCLC, 155 patients (21.4%) had stage IB NSCLC, 141 patients (19.5%) had stage II NSCLC, and 125 patients (17.3%) had stage IIIA NSCLC. Compared with patients with wildtype EGFR NSCLC, patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC were more likely to be women (106 women [31.7%] vs 251 women [64.5%]) and never smokers (121 never smokers [36.2%] vs 317 never smokers [81.5%]). At median (range) follow up of 46 (0-123) months, 299 patients (41.4%) had cancer recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference in 2-year DFS for EGFR-positive and wildtype EGFR NSCLC (70.2% [95% CI, 65.3%-74.5%] vs 67.6% [95% CI, 62.2%-72.4%]; P = .70), although patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC had significantly better 5-year overall survival (77.7% [95% CI, 72.4%-82.1%] vs 66.6% [95% CI, 60.5%-72.0%]; P = .004). Among patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC, 2-year DFS was 81.0% (95% CI, 74.0%-86.3%) for stage IA, 78.4% (95% CI, 68.2%-85.6%) for stage IB, 57.1% (95% CI, 43.7%-68.4%) for stage II, and 46.6% (95% CI, 34.7%-57.7%) for stage IIIA. Overall, 5-year DFS among patients with stage IB through IIIA was 37.2% (95% CI, 30.1%-44.3%). Sites of disease at recurrence were similar between EGFR-positive and wildtype EGFR NSCLC, with locoregional (64 patients [16.5%] vs 56 patients [16.8%]), lung (41 patients [10.5%] vs 40 patients [12.0%]), and intracranial (37 patients [9.5%] vs 22 patients [6.6%]) metastases being the most common. A risk estimation model incorporating genomic data and an individual patient nomogram using clinicopathologic features for stage I EGFR-positive NSCLC was developed to improve risk stratification., Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that recurrence rates were high in early-stage EGFR-positive NSCLC including stage IA, yet 37.2% of patients with stage IB through IIIA were cured without adjuvant osimertinib. Further studies are needed to elucidate individualized surveillance and adjuvant treatment strategies for early-stage EGFR-positive NSCLC.

Introduction: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) are tumor components present in circulation. Due to the limited access to both CTC enrichment platforms and ctDNA sequencing in most laboratories, they are rarely analyzed together., Methods: Concurrent isolation of ctDNA and single CTCs were isolated from lung cancer and breast cancer patients using the combination of size-based and CD45-negative selection method via DropCell platform. We performed targeted amplicon sequencing to evaluate the genomic heterogeneity of CTCs and ctDNA in lung cancer and breast cancer patients., Results: Higher degrees of genomic heterogeneity were observed in CTCs as compared to ctDNA. Several shared alterations present in CTCs and ctDNA were undetected in the primary tumor, highlighting the intra-tumoral heterogeneity of tumor components that were shed into systemic circulation. Accordingly, CTCs and ctDNA displayed higher degree of concordance with the metastatic tumor than the primary tumor. The alterations detected in circulation correlated with worse survival outcome for both lung and breast cancer patients emphasizing the impact of the metastatic phenotype. Notably, evolving genetic signatures were detected in the CTCs and ctDNA samples during the course of treatment and disease progression., Conclusions: A standardized sample processing and data analysis workflow for concurrent analysis of CTCs and ctDNA successfully dissected the heterogeneity of metastatic tumor in circulation as well as the progressive genomic changes that may potentially guide the selection of appropriate therapy against evolving tumor clonality., Competing Interests: ST is the current employee of Sysmex and ex-employee of Clearbridge mFluidics Pte Ltd. YL is ex-employee of Biolidics Ltd. CL is a cofounder and shareholder of Biolidics Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Kong, Liu, Tan, Tai, Phua, Poh, Yeo, Chua, Haw, Ling, Ng, Tan, Loh, Tan, Ng, Ang, Toh, Lee, Lim, Lim, Hillmer, Yap and Lim.)

Background: The efficacy of a combination of nimotuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor, with chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was evaluated in a phase II study., Methods: Patients with stage III/IV HNSCC received 3-weekly cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 for three cycles and weekly nimotuzumab 200 mg for 8 weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. Primary endpoint was best overall response (BOR) and secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Thirty-seven patients were included; the majority were Chinese (76%), male (89%), and had stage IVA/IVB HNSCC (92%). BOR of complete and partial response was seen in 22/37 (59%) and 10/37 (27%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 17.5 months (95% CI: 11.1-54.5) and 3-year PFS was 40.4% (95% CI: 24.3-55.9). The frequency and type of adverse events observed were similar to standard chemoradiation., Conclusion: The combination of nimotuzumab with cisplatin and radiotherapy was safe and achieved high response rates in HNSCC., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: RET rearrangements are an emerging targetable oncogenic fusion driver in NSCLC. However, the natural history of disease and activity of different classes of systemic therapy remain to be defined. Furthermore, molecular testing for RET is not yet routine, and the optimal method of testing is unclear. We present a comparative analysis of molecular profiling with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) and treatment outcomes., Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Baseline demographics and treatment outcomes were collected., Results: A total of 64 patients were included, with a median age of 62 years (range: 25-85), 56% were women, 77% were of Chinese ethnicity, 95% had adenocarcinoma, and 69% were never smokers. RET rearrangement was detected by FISH in 30 of 34 patients (88%), NGS in 40 of 43 patients (93%), and with discordant results in seven of 13 patients (54%) tested with both methods. Of 61 patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent disease, prevalence of central nervous system metastases was 31% and 92% received palliative systemic therapy. Overall survival was prolonged in patients treated with a selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus untreated patients (median 49.3 versus 15.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.40, p < 0.001). However, it was not different in patients treated with immunotherapy versus untreated patients (median 37.7 versus 49.3 mo; HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.53-3.19, p = 0.53). Overall survival was also prolonged in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion versus those with KIF5B-RET fusion (median 113.5 versus 37.7 mo; HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.38, p = 0.009)., Conclusions: In RET-rearranged NSCLC, selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is associated with improved survival outcomes, especially in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion. However, immunotherapy has poor efficacy. NGS and FISH testing methods may also result in substantial discordance., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: No practical method or assessment tool for identifying patients' and their families' health information resource needs in a resource center exists. We sought to assess the health information and resource preferences of patients and their families to guide the planning of a health information resource center (HIRC)., Methods: A needs assessment was conducted using convenience sample of patients and families drawn from the National Cancer Centre in Singapore. A survey was conducted to gather data from April 23, 2018, to May 11, 2018, at the Specialist Oncology Clinics (SOCs) and the Ambulatory Treatment Unit., Results: A total of 778 surveys were analyzed, and the majority of the respondents were Chinese (79.8%). There were 449 (57.7%) patients and 317 (40.7%) family members. Among the 778 respondents, the overall top item chosen for facilities, resources, and equipment were a quiet and comfortable area for reading and reflection (77.2%), information about education and support services offered by the center (71.6%), and computers with internet access (63.6%), respectively. The overall top three services needed in the resource center were advice on useful resources (70.6%); announcements on newly received materials, programs, and support services (64.8%); and resource personnel to assist with identifying materials/navigating through resources (53.2%). Written education pamphlets/brochures were rated as the most useful material (74.6%), followed by consumer health books (74.2%) and newsletter (59.6%). The top overall three supportive programs required were nutrition talks and cooking demonstrations (76.7%), counseling (individual, couples, family, and bereavement) (74.3%), and exercise (e.g., Tai Chi, yoga) (68.5%)., Conclusions: The findings obtained from this assessment provide guidance to the development of a user-friendly, patient- and family-centric HIRC., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd.)

Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women across all ethnicities, accounting for almost one in three incident cancers in female, and the leading cause of mortality in Singapore. Literature reveals that survivors of breast cancer have many concerns, and these concerns can linger on for decades. The primary aim of this secondary analysis was to establish the concerns of breast cancer survivors and use the data to inform practice., Methods: The present report was part of a bigger data designed to evaluate the concerns of cancer survivors (top six cancers) across the survivorship trajectory. Data of 438 breast cancer survivors were derived from a cross-sectional survey of the self-reported concerns of 1107 cancer survivors, using the questionnaire adopted from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Centre's Cancer Survivors Survey of Needs. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the odds ratios to assess the association of various variables with the presence of ≥1 concerned or very concerned issue among patients. Linear regression models were fitted to identify the variables associated with quality of life (QOL)., Results: A total of 438 breast cancer survivors responded to this survey. The top five concerns were cancer treatment and recurrence risk (55.5%), followed by fear of recurrence (FOR) (54.6%), long-term effects of treatment (53.4%), osteoporosis/bone health (39.0%), and keeping primary care physicians informed (37.4%). Cancer treatment and recurrence risk, FOR, and long-term treatment effects were among the top concerns across the survivorship trajectory. The mean QOL was 7.5 on a scale of 0-10., Conclusions: Irrespective of the cancer trajectory, survivors of breast cancer have serious concerns that warrant attention. Designing patient care delivery that addresses these concerns identified is critical in assisting them in their coping process and enhancing their QOL., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd.)

Cancer impacts not only the patient but also the family members who share the distressing trajectory of the patient. The literature indicates that caregivers have many unmet information needs while providing care and support to the cancer patients, and caregivers have to resort to seeking information to supplement their information needs. This study aims to establish the prevalence of health-information-seeking behaviours among caregivers of cancer patients as a means of ascertaining if their information needs have been met and their information source and resource preference. Data were obtained via a self-reported questionnaire from caregivers of cancer patients at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between 10 September and 7 December 2018. A total of 986 caregivers responded of which 180 (18%) caregivers did not undertake information search and the common reasons were 'trust healthcare professionals' (HCPs) more than other sources (64%), and 'HCPs provide enough information' (59%). Among the 795 caregivers who have searched for cancer information, about half of these caregivers (54%) have searched information on the Internet and another 15% have obtained their information from HCPs in their most recent search. A total of 371 (47%) caregivers have used their preferred source of information to conduct their most recent information search. The top three most commonly sought information was treatment (35.6%), disease (35.6%) and side effects (26.5%). Almost half (46%) of these caregivers was concerned about the quality of information they have found on the Internet. Our study supports that information-seeking is prevalent amongst caregivers of cancer patients and reveals the prevalence of Internet use and the concerns associated with its use. Patterns of information-seeking revealed a discrepancy between preferred and actual source. The results also suggest that HCPs play a significant role in the information-seeking behaviours of caregivers of cancer patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.)

Introduction: Several small studies have reviewed the efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP) in clinical practice outside a trial setting. We report the largest cohort study of clinical outcomes in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with AAP in a multicenter multiracial clinical setting., Methods: A retrospective analysis on mCRPC patients treated at four tertiary hospitals in Singapore from 2012 to 2017 was conducted. Disease characteristics, treatment outcomes, and adverse events were retrieved from electronic medical records. Primary clinical end-point was overall survival (OS). A subset analysis of patients with various variables and OS curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test., Results: Out of 200 patients with mCRPC treated with AAP, 163 (81.5%) patients were chemo-naïve (CN) and 37 (18.5%) patients were postchemotherapy (PC), with the median age of 68 (34-87) and 65 (52-80) years, respectively. Median OS was 20.0 (95% CI, 18.3-22.9) and 10.5 months (95% CI, 1.1-40.5) for CN and PC cohorts, respectively. A subset analysis of 108 patients showed a significantly longer OS in patients who had prior ADT for more than 12 months in CN patients (P < 0.001). Incidences of G3/G4 events were around 6.6%; most common side effect being hypertension with an incidence of 2.4%., Conclusions: Treatment of CN and PC patients with AAP was associated with a comparable OS and progression-free survival to the reported series. Patients who were responsive to prior ADT of 12 months or more were associated with an improved OS., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objectives: There is an expanding list of therapeutically relevant biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and molecular profiling at diagnosis is paramount. Tissue attrition in scaling traditional single biomarker assays from small biopsies is an increasingly encountered problem. We sought to compare the performance of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels with traditional assays and correlate the mutational landscape with PD-L1 status in Singaporean patients., Materials and Methods: We identified consecutive patients diagnosed between Jan 2016 to Sep 2017 with residual tissue after standard molecular testing. Tissue samples were tested using a targeted NGS panel for DNA alterations (29 selected genes including BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2 and TP53) and an RNA fusion panel (ALK, ROS1 and RET). PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was also performed. A cost-effectiveness analysis of NGS compared to standard molecular testing was conducted., Results: A total of 174 samples were evaluated: PD-L1 (n = 169), NGS DNA panel (n = 173) and RNA fusion (n = 119) testing. Median age was 68 years, 53 % were male, 58 % were never smokers, 85 % were Chinese, 66 % had stage IV disease and 95 % had adenocarcinoma histology. In patients profiled with NGS on DNA, EGFR (56 %), KRAS (14 %), BRAF (2 %) and ERBB2 (1 %) mutations were found. RNA fusion testing revealed fusions in ALK (6 %), RET (3 %) and ROS1 (1 %). Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that compared to sequential testing in EGFR negative patients, upfront NGS testing would result in an additional 1 % of patients with actionable alterations for targeted therapy being identified without significant increases in testing cost or turnaround time., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that even in an EGFR mutant predominant population, upfront NGS represents a feasible, cost-effective method of diagnostic molecular profiling compared with sequential testing strategies. Our results support the implementation of diagnostic NGS in non-squamous NSCLC in Asia to allow patients access to the most appropriate personalized therapy., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aim: Treatment strategies in laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) straddle the need for long term survival and tumor control as well as preservation of laryngeal function as far as possible. We sought to identify prognostic factors affecting LSCC outcomes in our population., Methods: Clinical characteristics, treatments and survival outcomes of patients with LSCC were analysed. Baseline comorbidity data was collected and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI) was calculated. Outcomes of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) were evaluated., Results: Two hundred and fifteen patients were included, 170 (79%) underwent primary radiation/ chemoradiation and the remainder upfront surgery with adjuvant therapy where indicated. The majority of patients were male, Chinese and current/ex-smokers. Presence of comorbidity was common with median aCCI of 3. Median OS was 5.8 years. On multivariable analyses, high aCCI and advanced nodal status were associated with inferior OS (HR 1.24 per one point increase in aCCI, P<0.001 and HR 3.52; p<0.001 respectively), inferior PFS (HR 1.14; p = 0.007 and HR 3.23; p<0.001 respectively) and poorer LFS (HR 1.19; p = 0.001 and HR 2.95; p<0.001 respectively). Higher tumor (T) stage was associated with inferior OS and LFS (HR 1.61; p = 0.02 and HR 1.91; p = 0.01 respectively)., Conclusion: In our Asian population, the presence of comorbidities and high nodal status were associated with inferior OS, PFS and LFS whilst high T stage was associated with inferior LFS and OS., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor ( MET) activation has been implicated as an oncogenic driver in epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can mediate primary and secondary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). High copy number thresholds have been suggested to enrich for response to MET inhibitors. We examined the clinical relevance of MET copy number gain (CNG) in the setting of treatment-naive metastatic EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC., Patients and Methods: MET fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in 200 consecutive patients identified as metastatic treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant-positive. We defined MET-high as CNG greater than or equal to 5, with an additional criterion of MET/centromeric portion of chromosome 7 ratiο greater than or equal to 2 for amplification. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) to EGFR TKI in patients identified as MET-high and -low was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Multiregion single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis was performed on 13 early-stage resected EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC across 59 sectors to investigate intratumoral heterogeneity of MET CNG., Results: Fifty-two (26%) of 200 patients in the metastatic cohort were MET-high at diagnosis; 46 (23%) had polysomy and six (3%) had amplification. Median TTF was 12.2 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 22.6 months) versus 13.1 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 15.0 months) for MET-high and -low, respectively ( P = .566), with no significant difference in response rate regardless of copy number thresholds. Loss of MET was observed in three of six patients identified as MET-high who underwent postprogression biopsies, which is consistent with marked intratumoral heterogeneity in MET CNG observed in early-stage tumors. Suboptimal response (TTF, 1.0 to 6.4 months) to EGFR TKI was observed in patients with coexisting MET amplification (five [3.2%] of 154)., Conclusion: Although up to 26% of TKI-naïve EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC harbor high MET CNG by fluorescence in situ hybridization, this did not significantly affect response to TKI, except in patients identified as MET-amplified. Our data underscore the limitations of adopting arbitrary copy number thresholds and the need for cross-assay validation to define therapeutically tractable MET pathway dysregulation in EGFR-mutant-positive NSCLC.

Background: Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone improves progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Radium-223 improves overall survival and delays the onset of symptomatic skeletal events in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases. We assessed concurrent treatment with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone and radium-223 in such patients., Methods: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 165 oncology and urology centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, and had histologically confirmed, progressive, chemotherapy-naive, asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, life expectancy of at least 6 months, and adequate haematological, renal, and liver function. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) according to a permuted block design (block size 4) via interactive response technology to receive up to six intravenous injections of radium-223 (55 kBq/kg) or matching placebo once every 4 weeks. All patients were also scheduled to receive oral abiraterone acetate 1000 mg once daily plus oral prednisone or prednisolone 5 mg twice daily during and after radium-223 or placebo treatment. The primary endpoint was symptomatic skeletal event-free survival, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02043678. Enrolment has been completed, and follow-up is ongoing., Findings: Between March 30, 2014, and Aug 12, 2016, 806 patients were randomly assigned to receive radium-223 (n=401) or placebo (n=405) in addition to abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone. The study was unblinded prematurely, on Nov 17, 2017, after more fractures and deaths were noted in the radium-223 group than in the placebo group (in an unplanned ad-hoc analysis), but all patients had completed radium-223 or placebo before this date. At the primary analysis (data cutoff Feb 15, 2018), 196 (49%) of 401 patients in radium-223 group had had at least one symptomatic skeletal event or died, compared with 190 (47%) of 405 patients in the placebo group (median follow-up 21·2 months [IQR 17·0-25·8]). Median symptomatic skeletal event-free survival was 22·3 months (95% CI 20·4-24·8) in the radium-223 group and 26·0 months (21·8-28·3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·122 [95% CI 0·917-1·374]; p=0·2636). Fractures (any grade) occurred in 112 (29%) of 392 patients in the radium-223 group and 45 (11%) of 394 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension (43 [11%] patients in the radium-223 group vs 52 [13%] patients in the placebo group), fractures (36 [9%] vs 12 [3%]) and increased alanine aminotransferase concentrations (34 [9%] vs 28 [7%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 160 (41%) patients in the radium-223 group and 155 (39%) in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two (1%) patients in the radium-223 group (acute myocardial infarction and interstitial lung disease) and one (<1%) in the placebo group (arrhythmia)., Interpretation: The addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone did not improve symptomatic skeletal event-free survival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases, and was associated with an increased frequency of bone fractures compared with placebo. Thus, we do not recommend use of this combination., Funding: Bayer., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

ᅟ.

Background: Afatinib is an oral irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Dose dependent side effects can limit drug exposure, which may impact on extracranial and central nervous system (CNS) disease control., Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 125 patients diagnosed with advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC treated with first-line afatinib at a tertiary Asian cancer center, exploring clinicopathological factors that may influence survival outcomes. Median progression free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of PFS between subgroups of patients was done using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Out of 125 patients, 62 (49.6%) started on 40 mg once daily (OD) afatinib, 61 (48.8%) on 30 mg OD and 1 (0.8%) on 20 mg OD. After median follow-up of 13.8 months from afatinib initiation, the observed response rate was 70.4% and median PFS 11.9 months (95% CI 10.3-19.3). 42 (33.6%) patients had baseline brain metastases (BM) and PFS of those who started on 40 mg OD (n = 17) vs. 30 mg OD (n = 25) was 13.3 months vs. 5.3 months (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.15-0.99). BM+ patients who started on 40 mg had similar PFS to patients with no BM (13.3 months vs. 15.0 months; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34-1.80)., Conclusion: In patients with advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC with BM+, initiating patients on afatinib 40 mg OD was associated with improved PFS compared to 30 mg OD, underscoring the potential importance of dose intensity in control of CNS disease.

Background: It is not known whether clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and survival of never-smokers among lung cancer incident cases have changed over time. We assessed the trend and overall survival (OS) of these patients within our institution during a 10-year period., Patients and Methods: We reviewed 2 cohorts of non-small-cell lung cancer patients with a diagnosis from 1999 to 2002 and from 2008 to 2011. The patient characteristics and OS were compared by smoking status within each cohort and between the 2 cohorts over time., Results: Of the 992 patients in the 1999-2002 cohort and the 1318 patients in the 2008-2011 cohort, 902 and 1272 had a known smoking status, respectively. The proportion of never-smokers increased from 31% in 1999-2002 to 48% in 2008-2011 (P < .001). Within both cohorts, the differences in characteristics among never-, former-, and current-smokers have remained largely constant over time. A greater proportion of never-smokers had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 and adenocarcinoma. The median OS increased from 15.5 months in 1999-2002 to 24.9 months in 2008-2011 (P = .001) for never-smokers, 12.3 to 15.9 months (P = .150) for former-smokers, and 10.5 to 13.9 months (P = .011) for current-smokers. The larger survival improvement among never-smokers was likely accounted for by the larger increase in never-smokers who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and pemetrexed over time., Conclusion: We found an increasing trend of never-smokers among incident lung cancer cases and improved survival for these patients during a 10-year period. The documentation of smoking status in any national cancer registry is vital to estimate the true incidence of lung cancer among never-smokers over time., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Since few studies have investigated whether the Distress Thermometer (DT) in Asian adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients (between 15 and 39 years), we investigated the appropriateness of the DT as a screening tool for psychological symptom burden in these AYA patients and to evaluate AYA patients' distress across a trajectory of three time points longitudinally over a 6-month period., Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal study. Recruited Asian AYA patients were diagnosed with lymphomas, sarcomas, primary brain malignancies, or germ cell tumors. Patients completed the DT, PedsQL Generic Core Scales, and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Data were analyzed using STATA version 15., Results: Approximately half of the patients experienced clinically significant DT distress (distress score ≥ 4) early in their cancer journey with 43.1% patients presenting with distress at time of diagnosis and 47.7% patients 1 month after diagnosis. Among AYA patients > 24 years old, worry (68.3%), insurance/financial issues (61%), treatment decisions (43.9%), work/school issues (41.5%), nervousness (41.5%), and sadness (41.5%) were the top five identified problems. On the other hand, the top five identified problems among AYA ≤ 24 years were worry (54.2%), nervousness (41.7%), bathing/dressing problems (37.5%), work/school issues (33.3%), and fatigue (33.3%). DT scores were significantly associated with certain psychological symptom burden items such as worry (p < 0.001), depressed mood (p = 0.020), and nervousness (p = 0.015)., Conclusion: The DT is a useful screening tool for psychological distress in AYA cancer patients with clinically significant distress being identified in the early phases of the cancer journey.

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met pathway dysregulation is a mechanism for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Ficlatuzumab (AV-299; SCH 900105), a humanized IgG 1 κ HGF inhibitory monoclonal antibody, prevents HGF/c-Met pathway ligand-mediated activation. This phase 1b study assessed the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib in Asian patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received intravenous ficlatuzumab either 10 mg/kg (cohort 1; n = 3) or 20 mg/kg (cohort 2; n = 12) every 2 weeks plus oral gefitinib 250 mg daily. Patients tolerated the drug combination well. Four treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 3 patients (cohort 2). Pharmacokinetic profiles for ficlatuzumab and gefitinib were consistent with prior single-agent trials. Partial responses were achieved in 5 patients (4 confirmed), all in cohort 2; objective response rate (ORR) was 33% (duration, 1.9-6.4 months). Responding patients had no prior EGFR TKI treatment, 2 without an EGFR mutation. Four additional patients had disease stabilization (cohort 2; duration, 2.7-9.1 months; 42% ORR). The recommended phase 2 dose for ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib 250 mg/day was 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. This drug combination has shown preliminary dose-related antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC., (© 2018, The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

L-N G -nitroarginine (LNNA), an analog of L-arginine, is a competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase which causes the selective reduction of blood flow to tumor cells. Despite the potential of LNNA to function as an adjuvant in cancer therapies, its poor solubility and stability have hindered the development of an injectable formulation of LNNA that is suitable for human administration. This work, for the first time, details a systematic study on the determination of equilibrium K a constants and the rate law of LNNA degradation. The four K a values of LNNA were determined to be 1.03, 1.10 × 10 -2 , 2.51 × 10 -10 , and 1.33 × 10 -13  M. From the kinetic and equilibrium studies, we have shown that the deprotonated form of LNNA is the main form of LNNA that undergoes degradation in aqueous media at room temperature. The rate law of LNNA degradation was found to be first order with respect to OH - concentration and first order with respect to LNNA - concentration. The rate constant at 25 °C and 1 atm was determined to be 0.04453 M -1 min -1 . A base catalyzed mechanism of LNNA degradation was proposed based on the kinetic study. The mechanism was found to be very useful in explaining the discrepancies and changes of the rate law at different pH values. It is thus recommended that LNNA should be formulated as a concentrated solution in acidic conditions for maximum chemical stability during storage and be diluted with a basic solution to near physiological pH just before administration.

Introduction: We reviewed changes in clinical characteristics, treatment and survival of lung cancer patients in Singapore over the past decade., Materials and Methods: We reviewed all primary lung cancer cases from January 2004 to December 2013. Basic demographic, clinical and treatment data were extracted from the database. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method; survival curves were compared using log-rank test. Linear regression trend lines were estimated using least squares approach, and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors., Results: Among 6006 lung cancer patients, the median age was 68 years old, 65% were males, 88% were Chinese, 92% had non-small-cell lung cancer and 76% had advanced stage IIIB/IV. There were proportionally more adenocarcinomas diagnosed over the years, while that of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and small-cell-lung cancer (SCLC) have remained stable. The median OS of all patients increased from 9.2 months in 2004 to 11.5 months in 2013. This survival improvement was statistically significant among patients with stage IIIB/IV (6.7 to 8.7 months; P = 0.005) and adenocarcinoma (12.7 to 15.4 months; P = 0.041). There was no improvement in median OS for SCC or SCLC. The use of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKI) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.73) and pemetrexed (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.76) were significantly associated with improved OS., Conclusion: Survival of patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma has improved over the past decade, and is potentially associated with the use of EGFR TKI and pemetrexed.

The transfer constant K trans is commonly employed in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies, but the utility and interpretation of K trans as a potential biomarker of tumor vasculature remains unclear. In this study, computer simulations based on a comprehensive tracer kinetic model with multiple pathways was used to provide clarification on the interpretation and application of K trans . Tissue concentration-time curves pertaining to a wide range of transport conditions were simulated using the multiple-pathway (MP) model and fitted using the generalized kinetic (GK) and extended GK models. Relationships between K trans and plasma flow F p , vessel permeability PS and extraction rate EF p under various transport conditions were assessed by correlation and regression analysis. Results show that the MP model provides an alternative two-tier interpretation of K trans based on the vascular transit time. K trans is primarily associated with F p and EF p respectively, in the slow and rapid vascular transit states, independent of the magnitude of PS. The relative magnitudes of PS and F p only serve as secondary constraints for which K trans can be further associated with EF p and PS in the slow and rapid transit states, respectively.

Introduction: High levels of toxicities have been observed when docetaxel is administered at the standard dose of 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks (Q3W) in the real-world treatment of Asian patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 2 attenuated regimens more widely used in an Asian setting to minimise toxicity - 60 mg/m 2 Q3W and weekly docetaxel (20 mg/m 2 to 35 mg/m 2 )., Materials and Methods: Medical records of 89 CRPC patients between December 2003 and April 2013 were reviewed. Pairwise statistical analysis was performed, comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of 75 mg/m 2 Q3W and weekly docetaxel with 60 mg/m 2 Q3W. Treatment endpoints used were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (decrease of ≥50% from baseline), pain improvement after cycle 2, overall survival, time to disease progression and radiological response., Results: Patients who received docetaxel at 75 mg/m 2 Q3W were younger than those who received 60 mg/m 2 Q3W (62 years and 66 years, respectively; P = 0.0489). Both groups had similar response rates. Compared with patients on 60 mg/m 2 Q3W, more patients on weekly regimens were symptomatic at baseline (63.2% and 87.5%, respectively; P = 0.0173). Longer overall survival was observed in the 60 mg/m 2 Q3W arm than the weekly docetaxel arm (16.9 months and 10.6 months, respectively; P = 0.0131), though other measures of response did not differ significantly., Conclusion: Our data supports the use of 60 mg/m 2 Q3W docetaxel which has similar efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile compared to the standard 75 mg/m 2 Q3W regimen. Weekly docetaxel has significant palliative benefits among symptomatic patients despite lower overall survival.

Introduction: This study analysed the tumour attenuation characteristics of different subtypes of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), including clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC (pRCC), mixed RCC, chromophobe RCC (chRCC) and oncocytoma., Methods: We randomly selected 100 RCC cases that underwent nephrectomy between 2004 and 2012 from a collaborative database. Of these cases, 36 were excluded due to the absence of available imaging. The remaining 64 cases comprised 35 ccRCCs, 11 pRCCs, eight chRCCs, seven mixed RCCs and three oncocytomas. The cases were classified as computed tomography (CT) kidney, CT urogram (with plain, nephrographic and pyelographic phases) or CT abdomen (with portovenous and delayed phases). A circular region of interest (ROI) ≥ 1 cm 2 was drawn and the same standard ROI size was used for each phase at the same site; three different circular ROIs were drawn per lesion per phase. Analysis of variance and t-test were used to examine differences in the radiological characteristics., Results: There was no statistical difference in the attenuation and degree of enhancement between mixed RCCs and ccRCCs. The attenuation and degree of enhancement of the oncocytomas were significantly higher than those of the other RCC subtypes., Conclusion: While mixed RCCs did not have attenuation characteristics that differed significantly from those of ccRCCs, oncocytomas can be distinguished from ccRCCs, pRCCs, chRCCs and mixed RCCs by their high radiological density and enhancement. The ability to differentiate oncocytomas from these tumours potentially allows the preoperative selection of patients with small renal masses for conservative management., (Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association)

Introduction: Activating mutations in the EGFR gene have been shown to confer sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, wide interpatient variability in treatment outcomes in response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in these patients remains unaccounted for. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EGFR mutation types and subtypes on survival outcomes in advanced Asian patients with NSCLC receiving first-line gefitinib therapy., Methods: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who were harboring EGFR mutations, receiving first-line gefitinib treatment, and of Asian descent (N = 383) were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were implemented to evaluate the differences in PFS and OS., Results: Significant differences in PFS were observed between patients carrying EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21, with patients carrying EGFR exon 19 mutations having the longest median PFS (overall p = 8.88 × 10 -15 ). Comparison of PFS among the five different exon 19 mutation subtypes and among the two exon 19 deletion start codons did not reveal any significant differences. No significant difference was observed in OS among patients carrying EGFR mutations on different exons (overall p = 0.054); however, OS was found to be significantly different among the various subtypes of exon 19 mutations, with the 15-nucleotide deletion "non-ELREA" group having the shortest OS of 11.3 months (overall p = 0.025)., Conclusions: EGFR mutation types and subtypes significantly influence survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC who are receiving first-line gefitinib treatment., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The critical role of lysine demethylase 4A (KDM4A), in regulating chromatin structure and consequently in driving cellular proliferation and oncogenesis has been the focus of recent studies. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with adenocarcinoma histology who were homozygous for KDM4A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-A482 (rs586339) were recently shown to have significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared with patients with the wild-type or the heterozygous genotype at this locus (hazard ratio=1.68, P=0.042). In the current study, we investigated the association between the same polymorphism with OS in our Asian NSCLC-adenocarcinoma patients comprising Chinese (N=572), Malays (N=50), and Indians (N=22). KDM4A SNP-A482 genotype status was determined by Sanger sequencing. OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis to date of death or censored at the date of last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression methods were utilized to evaluate OS outcomes. KDM4A SNP-A482 had a minor allele (C) frequency of 18.8% and a major allele (A) frequency of 81.2% in our Asian NSCLC (adenocarcinoma) patients. However, the OS in our Asian NSCLC patients homozygous for KDM4A SNP-A482 was not significantly different from those who were wild type or heterozygous at this locus [CC vs. AA/AC: median OS (95% confidence interval): 40.2 (18.7-61.6) vs. 29.6 (26.9-32.3) months; P=0.858]. The results remained statistically nonsignificant even after adjustment for epidermal growth factor receptor mutational status, suggesting that KDM4A SNP-A482 does not significantly influence OS in Asian NSCLC patients.

Metronomic administration of chemotherapy has long been recognized as having a different biological effect from maximal tolerated dose (MTD) administration. Preclinical studies have demonstrated these differences quite elegantly and many clinical trials have also demonstrated reproducible activity albeit small, in varied solid malignancies even in patients who were heavily pretreated. However, the concept of metronomic chemotherapy has been plagued by lack of a clear definition resulting in the published literature that is rather varied and confusing. There is a need for a definition that is mechanism(s)-based allowing metronomics to be distinguished from standard MTD concept. With significant advances made in understanding cancer biology and biotechnology, it is now possible to attain that goal. What is needed is both a concerted effort and adequate funding to work towards it. This is the only way for the oncology community to determine how metronomic chemotherapy fits in the overall cancer management schema., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment with sorafenib, although associated with inhibition of tumour growth and angiogenesis in in vivo studies, leads to up-regulation of pERK. The addition of MEK inhibition could potentially abrogate this effect and potentiate anti-tumour activity. This phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and biomarker correlates of selumetinib combined with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: Patients with Child-Pugh (CP) score ≤7 were treated with 400 mg twice daily of sorafenib with escalating doses of selumetinib in a 3 + 3 study design. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period was 28 days. PK of selumetinib was determined. Angiogenic effect was evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)., Results: Twenty-seven patients of Asian ethnicity were enrolled. The MTD was selumetinib 75 mg daily with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. DLT included grade 3 transaminitis, diarrhoea and fatigue. Most common treatment-related adverse events at MTD (all grades) were diarrhoea (85%), rash (59%), hypertension (44%), fatigue (30%), anorexia (22%) and hand-foot syndrome (22%). Four patients (15%) had PR and 13 (48%) had SD. PR or SD was observed for ≥6 months in seven patients. The median overall survival was 14.4 months. Selumetinib exposures in combination with sorafenib were comparable to other monotherapy studies. A reduction in permeability-surface area product noted in DCE-MRI with treatment correlated with worse survival outcomes., Conclusion: The MTD of selumetinib was 75 mg daily when combined with sorafenib 400 mg twice a day in CP ≤7 HCC. Acceptable adverse events and encouraging anti-tumour activity warrant further evaluation. DCE-MRI findings deserve prospective evaluation., Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT01029418., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the combination of oral vinorelbine with erlotinib using the conventional (CSV) and metronomic (MSV) dosing schedules in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This was an open-label, multiple dose-escalation phase I study. An alternating 3+3 phase I design was employed to allow each schedule to enroll three patients sequentially at each dose level. Thirty patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with escalating doses of oral vinorelbine starting at 40 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 in the CSV group (N = 16) and at 100 mg/week in the MSV group (N = 14). Erlotinib was administered orally daily., Results: The maximum tolerated dose was vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 with erlotinib 100 mg in the CSV group and vinorelbine 120 mg/week with erlotinib 100 mg in the MSV group. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (N = 2; 13%) and hyponatremia (N = 1; 6%) in the CSV group, and neutropenia (N = 5; 36%) in the MSV group. Objective response was achieved in 38% and 29% in the CSV and MSV groups respectively. Vinorelbine co-administration did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and OSI-420 after initial dose. However, at steady-state, significantly higher Cmax, higher Cmin and lower CL/F of erlotinib were observed with increasing dose levels of vinorelbine in the CSV group. Significantly higher steady-state Cmin, Cavg and AUCss of erlotinib were observed with increasing dose levels of vinorelbine in the MSV group., Conclusions: Combination of oral vinorelbine with erlotinib is feasible and tolerable in both the CSV and MSV groups., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702182.

Purpose: To examine the effect of metformin use on survival outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1528 RCC patients from 2 centers between 1992 and 2012 was conducted. A total of 390 diabetics with confirmed metformin use were included in the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 43.1 months. Primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression models were performed to evaluate the effects of potential predictors on DFS and CSS, following stratification of patients into local and metastatic disease., Results: We identified 290 diabetics with localized and 100 with metastatic RCC. There were no clinicopathologic differences in the profiles of metformin users and non-metformin users. For patients with localized RCC, metformin users had significantly better DFS (hazard ratio, 0.47; P < .01) and CSS (hazard ratio, 0.21; P < .01) than non-users. There was no difference in CSS between metformin users and non-metformin users in diabetics with metastatic RCC (hazard ratio, 0.78; P = .286). Limitations include retrospective design and lack of data on metformin dosage and duration of use., Conclusions: Metformin use is correlated with improved survival in patients with localized RCC, but not in metastatic RCC. Future studies should focus on its potential mechanisms and clinical utility., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a unique disease endemic in Asia. It is etiologically linked to the Epstein-Barr virus and is both radio- and chemo-sensitive. While radiotherapy (RT) remains the primary treatment modality with high cure rates for early stage disease, systemic treatment forms an important integral component in the treatment of NPC, both in the non-metastatic as well as palliative setting. Presently, standard therapy in locally advanced NPC comprises conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy administered concurrently during RT. The role of induction chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy remain to be well-defined. Further research strategies in non-metastatic disease will require better identification of patients with high risk disease, and determining the optimal sequence and combination of chemotherapeutic regimens. In metastatic disease, whilst chemotherapy remains the mainstay of care, resistance inevitably develops. Development of molecularly targeted therapies has not yielded much success to date, and further research has been focused on development of EBV-targeted strategies such as vaccination or administration of cytotoxic T-cells directed towards EBV, as well as evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibition approaches.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung represents about 20-30% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and is associated with a poorer prognosis with limited treatment options. Erlotinib is an approved, standard second-line therapy in this setting, besides docetaxel. The LUX-Lung 8 study has shown superior overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), as well as disease control rates for treatment with afatinib compared to erlotinib in this head-to-head trial in patients with previously treated advanced SCC of the lung, with manageable side effect profile. This is the first and largest prospective phase III trial comparing two different tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced SCC of the lung. Whether the results would be practice-changing remains to be seen, especially with the advent of novel immunotherapeutic agents such as nivolumab, which is recently approved for advanced lung SCC.